Difference between revisions of "COECSA RESIDENCY CURRICULUM"

From College of Ophthalmology of Eastern Central and Southern Africa
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(18 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 124: Line 124:
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|'''DOMAINS'''
 
|'''DOMAINS'''
|'''1) Basic  & Clinical Sciences'''  
+
|'''1) [http://curriculum.coecsa.org/index.php/COECSA_RESIDENCY_CURRICULUM#BASIC_CLINICAL_SCIENCES_.28BCS.29.5Bedit_.7C_edit_source.5D Basic  & Clinical Sciences]'''
 
|'''2)  Clinical Assessment'''
 
|'''2)  Clinical Assessment'''
 
|'''3)  Patient Investigation'''
 
|'''3)  Patient Investigation'''
Line 489: Line 489:
 
# [http://curriculum.coecsa.org/index.php/Basic_%26_Clinical_Sciences Basic & Clinical Sciences]          
 
# [http://curriculum.coecsa.org/index.php/Basic_%26_Clinical_Sciences Basic & Clinical Sciences]          
 
# [http://curriculum.coecsa.org/index.php/CLINICAL_ASSESSMENT_(CA) Clinical Assessment]    
 
# [http://curriculum.coecsa.org/index.php/CLINICAL_ASSESSMENT_(CA) Clinical Assessment]    
# Patient Investigation  
+
# [http://curriculum.coecsa.org/index.php/Patient_Investigation Patient Investigation]  
# Patient Management  
+
# [http://curriculum.coecsa.org/index.php/PATIENT_MANAGEMENT_(PM) Patient Management]  
# Practical Skills              
+
# [http://curriculum.coecsa.org/index.php/PRACTICAL_SKILLS_(PS) Practical Skills]              
# Surgical Skills
+
# [http://curriculum.coecsa.org/index.php/SURGICAL_SKILLS_(SS) Surgical Skills]
# Community Eye Health
+
# [http://curriculum.coecsa.org/index.php/COMMUNITY_EYE_HEALTH_(CEH) Community Eye Health]
# Communication            
+
# [http://curriculum.coecsa.org/index.php/COMMUNICATION_(COM) Communication]            
# Best Practice
+
# [http://curriculum.coecsa.org/index.php/BEST_PRACTICE_(BP) Best Practice]
# Management and Leadership
+
# [http://curriculum.coecsa.org/index.php/MANAGEMENT_AND_LEADERSHIP_(ML) Management and Leadership]
 +
 
  
 
The table below summarizes the competences for the learning outcomes in their respective domains.<blockquote>'''PLEASE NOTE''' that in the various domains there are some crosscutting learning outcomes, hence the need to pay attention to the related learning outcomes while addressing a particular learning outcome.  </blockquote>
 
The table below summarizes the competences for the learning outcomes in their respective domains.<blockquote>'''PLEASE NOTE''' that in the various domains there are some crosscutting learning outcomes, hence the need to pay attention to the related learning outcomes while addressing a particular learning outcome.  </blockquote>
  
== '''ASSESSMENTS''' ==
+
==== ''BASIC CLINICAL SCIENCES (BCS)''[edit | edit source] ====
  
==== '''''Assessments Overview''''' ====
+
===== Anatomy and Embryology[edit | edit source] =====
''Broadly speaking'' the learning outcomes for each domain of clinical practice are assessed as follows:
+
                                               
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
|
+
| colspan="2" |'''BASIC CLINICAL SCIENCES (BCS)'''
|Domain of Practice
+
|-
 +
|'''Learning Outcome'''
 +
|'''Anatomy and Embryology'''
 +
|-
 +
|Code
 +
|BCS1
 +
|-
 +
|Description
 +
|Trainees must understand and apply knowledge of the anatomy and embryology of the eye, adnexae, visual pathways and associated aspects of head, neck and neuro anatomy. It extends to applied anatomy relevant to clinical methods of assessment and investigation relevant to ophthalmic practice. They must be able to use this knowledge when interpreting clinical investigations and in the practice of ophthalmic surgery.
 +
|-
 
|Assessment
 
|Assessment
 +
|'''Portfolio/Log Book: And End Of Part 1 – Exams/ COECSA Exams'''
 
|-
 
|-
|'''BCS'''
+
|Target Year of Achievement
|Basic and  clinical sciences
+
|Target Year 1- 2
|Part 1 COECSA, Part 2 COECSA exams
 
 
|-
 
|-
|'''CA'''
+
|Related Learning Outcomes
|Clinical  assessment
+
|BCS1-BC12
|WpBA*rating  scales, Part 2 COECSA exams
 
 
|-
 
|-
|'''PI'''
+
|Other Links
|Patient investigation
+
|Study Guide ''' '''3.1.13, BSC1
|WpBA*rating  scales, Part 2 COECSA exams
+
|}
 +
 
 +
===== Physiology[edit | edit source] =====
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="2" |'''BASIC CLINICAL SCIENCES (BCS)'''
 
|-
 
|-
|'''PM'''
+
|'''Learning Outcome'''
|Patient  management
+
|'''Physiology'''
|WpBA*rating  scales ,Part 2 COECSA exams
 
 
|-
 
|-
|'''PS'''
+
|Code
|Practical  skills
+
|BCS2
|WpBA*rating  scales ,Part 2 COECSA exams
 
 
|-
 
|-
|'''SS'''
+
|Description
|Surgical  skills
+
|Trainees must understand and apply knowledge of the physiology of the eye, adnexae and nervous system, including related general physiology. This includes the applied physiology relevant to clinical methods of assessment in ophthalmic practice. They must be able to use this knowledge when interpreting clinical symptoms, signs and investigations and in the practice of ophthalmic medicine and surgery.
|WpBA*rating  scales, Part 2 COECSA exams
 
 
|-
 
|-
|'''CEH'''
+
|Assessment
|Community eye  health
+
|'''Portfolio/Log Book: And End Of Part 1 – Exams/ COECSA Exams'''
|WpBA*rating  scales ,Part 2 COECSA exams
 
 
|-
 
|-
|'''Com'''
+
|Target Year of Achievement
|Communication
+
|Target Year 1- 2
|WpBA*rating  scales ,Part 2 COECSA exams
 
 
|-
 
|-
|'''BP'''
+
|Related Learning Outcomes
|Best  practice
+
|BCS1-BC12
|WpBA*rating  scales
 
 
|-
 
|-
|'''ML'''
+
|Other Links
|Management  and leadership
+
|Study Guide  '''3.1.13, BSC2'''
|WpBA*rating  scales
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
==== '''''EXAMINATIONS''''' ====
+
===== Biochemistry Molecular and Cell Biology[edit | edit source] =====
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="2" |'''BASIC CLINICAL SCIENCES (BCS)'''
 +
|-
 +
|'''Learning Outcome'''
 +
|'''Biochemistry Molecular and Cell Biology'''
 +
|-
 +
|Code
 +
|BCS3
 +
|-
 +
|Description
 +
|Trainees must understand and apply knowledge of the basic biochemistry and cell biology. This includes in particular those aspects relevant to common eye diseases. They must be able to use this knowledge when interpreting clinical symptoms, signs and laboratory investigations and in the practice of ophthalmic medicine and surgery.
 +
|-
 +
|Assessment
 +
|'''Portfolio/log book: and end of Year /COECSA exams'''
 +
|-
 +
|Target Year of Achievement
 +
|Target Year 1- 2
 +
|-
 +
|Related Learning Outcomes
 +
|BCS1-BC12
 +
|-
 +
|Other Links
 +
|Study Guide '''3.1.13, BSC3'''
 +
|}
  
'''A.     Summative assessment in Ophthalmology residency'''
+
===== Pathology[edit | edit source] =====
 
+
{| class="wikitable"
To qualify as an ophthalmologist under COECSA, a candidate must pass:
+
| colspan="2" |'''BASIC CLINICAL SCIENCES (BCS)'''
 
+
|-
* ¨  Basic sciences exam ( Part1)
+
|'''Learning Outcome'''
* ¨  Refraction and Optics (intermediate)
+
|'''Pathology'''
* ¨  Ophthalmic medicine and Ophthalmic surgery exam( Part 2)
+
|-
* ¨  Clinical final exam
+
|Code
* ¨  (Dissertation/Publication)
+
|BCS4
 +
|-
 +
|Description
 +
|Trainees must understand and apply knowledge of pathology of the eye, adnexae and visual system. This includes histopathology, microbiology and immunology and other branches of pathology. They must be able to use this knowledge when interpreting clinical symptoms, signs and investigations and in the practice of ophthalmic medicine and surgery.
 +
|-
 +
|Assessment
 +
|'''Portfolio/log book: and end of Year /COECSA exams'''
 +
|-
 +
|Target Year of Achievement
 +
|Target Year 1-2
 +
|-
 +
|Related Learning Outcomes
 +
|BCS1-BC12
 +
|-
 +
|Other Links
 +
|Study Guide '''3.1.13, BSC4'''
 +
|}
  
 
+
===== Optics[edit | edit source] =====
'''B.      Exams: Part 1 (Visual/Basic Sciences & Refraction and Optics)'''
 
 
 
* ¨  COECSA Part 1: ideally done during the first year of training. In the interim period, COECSA has opted to use ICO part one for convenience. The standards of ICO exams are universally accepted and a good number of residents are already sitting it in the region.
 
* ¨  ICO Part 1 will be adopted as COECSA part 1 till April 2021.
 
* ¨  The University MMed part 1 will be accepted as equivalent till end of 2019
 
* ¨  In 2020, COECSA senate shall assess the value of ICO exams for COECSA, and decide whether to continue or set own?
 
* ¨   From March 2022, COECSA will have its own part 1 exam if a decision to go that route is taken.
 
* ¨  Further, COECSA Optics and refraction exam will also be the ICO exam from April 2019 until April 2022.
 
* ¨   COECSA will have its own exam intermediate exam (Optics) from March 2023
 
* ¨  MMed Optics and Refraction (if any), will be accepted as equivalent till End of December 2020
 
 
 
 
 
'''C.       Exams: Part 2 (Opth medicine and surgery)'''
 
 
 
* ¨  COECSA Ophthalmic Medicine and surgery part 2 exam will be the ICO exam from April 2021 till March 2024.
 
* ¨  MMed part 2 exam will be accepted as equivalent till end of 2021.
 
* ¨  From April 2025, COECSA will have its own part 2 exam subject to College Senate decision
 
 
 
 
 
'''D.      Clinical Final Exam'''
 
 
 
* ¨  The current COECSA Fellowship Exam will remain as the final exit Clinical Exam
 
 
 
==== '''''Target Year of Achievement (TYA)''''' ====
 
'''These are summarized as follows:'''
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
|'''TYA'''
+
| colspan="2" |'''BASIC CLINICAL SCIENCES (BCS)'''
|'''Explanation'''
+
|-
|'''Example'''
+
|'''Learning Outcome'''
 +
|'''Optics'''
 +
|-
 +
|Code
 +
|BCS5
 
|-
 
|-
|Year 1
+
|Description
|This LO must normally be achieved '''during  the first year''' of training and by the '''end of year 1 at the  latest'''.
+
|Trainees must understand and apply knowledge of optics, ultrasound and electromagnetic wavelengths relevant to ophthalmic practice. They must be able to use this knowledge when interpreting clinical symptoms, signs and investigations and in the practice of ophthalmic medicine and surgery.
|CA1 (Clinical  history)
 
 
|-
 
|-
|Year 2
+
|Assessment
|This LO must normally be achieved '''during  the first or second year''' of training and by the '''end of year  2 at the latest'''. Failure to achieve a significant number of these LO  before the end of year 2 without mitigating circumstances may lead to a  trainee being removed from the training programme.
+
|'''Portfolio/log book: and end of Year /COECSA exams'''
|BCS (Basic &  Clinical Sciences)
 
 
|-
 
|-
|Year 3
+
|Target Year of Achievement
|This LO must normally be achieved '''during  the first three years''' of training and by the '''end of year 3  at the latest'''. Failure to achieve a significant number of these LO before  year 3 may require year 3 to be repeated.
+
|Target Year 1-2
|SS4 (Cataract)
 
 
 
PS1 (Refraction)
 
 
|-
 
|-
|Year 1,2,3/4 annual review
+
|Related Learning Outcomes
|This LO must be achieved before the end of  year 2 '''and''' will be assessed annually thereafter.
+
|BCS1-BC12
|BP10-30
 
 
 
COM1-14
 
 
|-
 
|-
|Year 3/4
+
|Other Links
|This LO must be achieved in order to complete  the core curriculum. It is unlikely to be achieved in the first two years of  training but may be achieved anytime during years 3/4
+
|Study Guide '''3.1.13, BSC5'''
|SS5 (surgery to lower  IOP)
+
|}
|} 
 
 
 
==== '''''WorkPLACE BaseD Assessments''''' ====
 
'''The following WpBA assessment tools are available for Training:'''
 
  
 +
===== Clinical ophthalmology[edit | edit source] =====
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
|'''Tool'''
+
| colspan="2" |'''BASIC CLINICAL SCIENCES (BCS)'''
|'''Code'''
+
|-
|'''Number of tools'''
+
|'''Learning Outcome'''
|'''Main Learning Outcome Domains Assessed'''
+
|'''Clinical ophthalmology'''
 +
|-
 +
|Code
 +
|BCS6
 +
|-
 +
|Description
 +
|Trainees must be able to evaluate a patient’s ocular, medical and surgical problems in order to formulate a differential diagnosis to serve as a basis for making laboratory and clinical investigations.
 
|-
 
|-
|Clinical Rating Scale (modified CEX)
+
|Assessment
|CRS
+
|'''portfolio/log book and end Year 2-3/4 – Exams /COECSA exams'''
|8
 
|Clinical Assessment; Practical Refraction
 
 
|-
 
|-
|Case based Discussion
+
|Target Year of Achievement
|CbD
+
|Year 1,2,3 and 4
|1
 
|Patient Investigation; Communication; Patient Management; Best  Practice; Community Eye Health; Management and Leadership; Basic and Clinical  Sciences
 
 
|-
 
|-
|Direct Observation of Procedural Skills
+
|Related Learning Outcomes
|DOPS
+
|BCS1-BC12
|1
 
|Practical Skills; Communication; Patient Investigation
 
 
|-
 
|-
|Objective Assessment of Surgical and Technical Skills
+
|Other Links
 +
|Study Guide '''3.1.13, BSC6'''
 +
|}
  
 +
===== Clinical Pharmacology[edit | edit source] =====
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="2" |'''BASIC CLINICAL SCIENCES (BCS)'''
 +
|-
 +
|'''Learning Outcome'''
 +
|'''Clinical Pharmacology'''
 +
|-
 +
|Code
 +
|BCS7
 +
|-
 +
|Description
 +
|Trainees must understand and apply knowledge of clinical pharmacology relevant to ophthalmic practice. They must be able to use this knowledge when prescribing for a patient. They must understand the medications used in general medicine and surgery to a basic standard. They must be aware of the possible ocular effects of systemic and topical medications and systemic effects of ocular and systemic medications.
 +
|-
 +
|Assessment
 +
|'''portfolio/log book and end Year 2-3/4 – Exams /COECSA exams'''
 +
|-
 +
|Target Year of Achievement
 +
|Year 1.2, ¾
 +
|-
 +
|Related Learning Outcomes
 +
|BCS1-BC12
 +
|-
 +
|Other Links
 +
|Study Guide '''3.1.13, BSC7'''
 +
|}
  
Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubric
+
===== General Medicine for Ophthalmology[edit | edit source] =====
|OSATS
+
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="2" |'''BASIC CLINICAL SCIENCES (BCS)'''
 +
|-
 +
|'''Learning Outcome'''
 +
|'''General Medicine for Ophthalmology'''
 +
|-
 +
|Code
 +
|BCS8
 +
|-
 +
|Description
 +
|Trainees must understand and apply knowledge of general medicine and surgery relevant to ophthalmic practice. They must be able to recognise when a patient is seriously ill and make appropriate arrangements for the patient's care
 +
|-
 +
|Assessment
 +
|'''portfolio/log book: and end Year /COECSA exams'''
 +
|-
 +
|Target Year of Achievement
 +
|Year 1 ,2,3,4
 +
|-
 +
|Related Learning Outcomes
 +
|BCS1-BC12
 +
|-
 +
|Other Links
 +
|Study Guide  '''3.1.13, BSC8'''
 +
|}
  
 
+
===== Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence Based Medicine[edit | edit source] =====
 
+
{| class="wikitable"
OSCAR
+
| colspan="2" |'''BASIC CLINICAL SCIENCES (BCS)'''
|4
+
|-
|Surgical Skills; Communication
+
|'''Learning Outcome'''
 +
|'''Clinical Epidemiology, Statistics and Evidence Based Medicine'''
 +
|-
 +
|Code
 +
|BCS9
 +
|-
 +
|Description
 +
|Trainees must understand and apply knowledge of clinical epidemiology, statistics and evidence based medicine relevant to ophthalmic practice. They must be able to use this knowledge during clinical assessment, interpreting investigations and planning clinical management for a patient. Their knowledge must include the influence of economic and political considerations (on a local and global scale) on individual and community health and how these may be influenced.
 +
|-
 +
|Assessment
 +
|'''Cbd, journal club and Research Project and end of year/COECSA exams'''
 +
|-
 +
|Target Year of Achievement
 +
|Year 1, 2,3,4
 +
|-
 +
|Related Learning Outcomes
 +
|BCS1-BC12
 
|-
 
|-
|Multi-source feedback (modified PAT)
+
|Other Links
|MSF
+
|Study Guide '''3.1.13, BSC9'''
|1
 
|Communication; Best Practice
 
 
|}
 
|}
The WpBA tools are available through the website to download for completion, validation by the trainer and can be stored in a paper-based portfolio/e-portfolio (when available). Guidance is available at your institution about who should be the assessor as not all assessments need to be performed by a consultant ophthalmologist. The target year of achievement (TYA) guidance indicates when each WpBA should be achieved.
 
  
If a trainee does not complete an assessment successfully, the assessment tool will act as a useful source of feedback and allow preparation for a subsequent assessment. It therefore allows for both formative (developmental) and summative (competence) assessment. Trainees should be encouraged to undergo formative assessment regularly as part of their training and not see 'failure' at an assessment as a problem. Trainees should keep all assessment forms in their portfolio to show that they are obtaining appropriate feedback and making progress. A portfolio that only contains 'passed' assessments should be discouraged - there should be a "culture of deferred success". A variety of assessors should be used, and especially where two satisfactory assessments are required in any year these should be completed by different assessors where possible.
+
===== Instruments TECHNOLOGY[edit | edit source] =====
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="2" |'''BASIC CLINICAL SCIENCES (BCS)'''
 +
|-
 +
|'''Learning Outcome'''
 +
|'''Instruments'''
 +
|-
 +
|Code
 +
|BCS10
 +
|-
 +
|Description
 +
|All trainees must understand and apply knowledge of instrument technology relevant to ophthalmic practice.
 +
They must be aware of the limitations of technology and the risks involved in their use.They must be able to maintain an understanding of new developments in relevant technologies.
 +
|-
 +
|Assessment
 +
|'''Portfolio, logbooks and end of year/ COECSA exams'''
 +
|-
 +
|Target Year of Achievement
 +
|Year 2 and Year ¾
 +
|-
 +
|Related Learning Outcomes
 +
|BCS1-BC12
 +
|-
 +
|Other Links
 +
|Study Guide '''3.1.13, BSC10'''
 +
|}
  
 +
===== BIOStatistics[edit | edit source] =====
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="2" |'''BASIC CLINICAL SCIENCES (BCS)'''
 +
|-
 +
|'''Learning Outcome'''
 +
|'''Biostatistics'''
 +
|-
 +
|Code
 +
|BCS11
 +
|-
 +
|Description
 +
|All trainees must understand and apply knowledge of statistics relevant to ophthalmic practice.
 +
They must be able to use this knowledge in the interpretation and publication of research.
 +
|-
 +
|Assessment
 +
|'''Presentations and Research Project, end of year/COECSA exams'''
 +
|-
 +
|Target Year of Achievement
 +
|Year 1, 2
 +
|-
 +
|Related Learning Outcomes
 +
|BCS1-BC12
 +
|-
 +
|Other Links
 +
|Study Guide '''3.1.13, BSC11'''
 +
|}
  
'''''MILESTONES'''''
+
===== Clinical Genetics[edit | edit source] =====
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="2" |'''BASIC CLINICAL SCIENCES (BCS)'''
 +
|-
 +
|'''Learning Outcome'''
 +
|'''Clinical Genetics'''
 +
|-
 +
|Code
 +
|BCS12
 +
|-
 +
|Description
 +
|Trainees must understand and apply knowledge of clinical genetics relevant to ophthalmic practice. They must be able to use this knowledge when advising patients about patterns of inheritance. They must recognise when it is appropriate to refer a patient for genetic counselling. They must recognise when it is important to offer a consultation with family members.
 +
|-
 +
|Assessment
 +
|'''Cbd, portfolio/log book and end of Year /COECSA Exams'''
 +
|-
 +
|Target Year of Achievement
 +
|Year 1-2
 +
|-
 +
|Related Learning Outcomes
 +
|BCS1-BC12
 +
|-
 +
|Other Links
 +
|Study Guide '''3.1.13, BSC12'''
 +
|}
 +
                           
  
Milestones are knowledge, skills, attitudes, and other attributes organized in a developmental framework from less to more advanced.  They are descriptors and targets for resident performance as the resident moves from entry into residency through graduation.  These milestones were adapted from the ACGME Milestones used for residency training in the USA facilitated by the International Council of Ophthalmology and Orbis International. Each of the COECSA sub-domains of performance have been mapped to the milestones. The original ACGME milestone language has been modified when necessary to reflect practice in the COECSA region and correspond to the COECSA Curriculum. 
+
===== Basic Clinical Sciences Study Guides[edit | edit source] =====
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|'''ABBREV'''
 +
| rowspan="2" |'''OUTCOME'''
 +
| colspan="2" |'''HOW CAN I ACHIEVE THIS OUTCOME'''
 +
| colspan="2" |'''HOW WILL THIS OUTCOME BE ASSESSED'''
 +
|'''HOW CAN I HELP A TRAINEE ACHIEVE THIS OUTCOME'''
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
|Resources
 +
|Methods/ experience
 +
|Indirect
 +
|Direct
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|'''BCS1'''
 +
|Anatomy
 +
|Text books, Web sites part 1
 +
|Reading Tutorials E learning Discussion forum
 +
|Clinical and surgical anatomy knowledge in work based assessments
 +
|COECSA Year  1 Written/clinical exam
 +
|Explain clinical and surgical anatomy in clinical teaching sessions Encourage/facilitate tutorials Facilitate use of local medical school anatomy museum
 +
|-
 +
|'''BCS2'''
 +
|Physiology
 +
|Text books, Web sites part 1
 +
|Reading Tutorials E learning Discussion forum
 +
|Applied physiology knowledge in work based assessments
 +
|Part 1
 +
Written/clinical exam
 +
|Explain applied physiology in clinical teaching sessions Encourage/facilitate tutorials
 +
|-
 +
|'''BCS3'''
 +
|Biochemisty and Cell Biology
 +
|Text books, Web sites part 1
 +
|Reading Tutorials E learning Discussion forum
 +
|Applied science in work based assessments
 +
|Part 1
 +
Written/clinical exam
 +
|Explain applied biochemistry & cell biology in clinical teaching sessions Encourage/facilitate tutorials
 +
|-
 +
|'''BCS4'''
 +
|Pathology
 +
|Text books, Web sites part1
 +
|Reading Tutorials E learning Discussion forum Clinical-pathologic al conferences
 +
|Clinical discussions in work based assessments
 +
|Part 1
 +
Written/clinical exam -
 +
|Arrange clinical-pathology meetings Explain pathology, microbiology, immunology in clinical teaching sessions Encourage/facilitate tutorials Encourage learning with pathologists and microbiologists Facilitate use of local medical school pathology museum
 +
|-
 +
|'''BCS5'''
 +
|Optics
 +
|Text books, Web sites Part1 syllabus
 +
|Reading Tutorials E learning Discussion forum professionals Attend LVA sessions Attend optometric practice
 +
Demonstrate use of Optic equipment
 +
|Clinical discussions in work based assessments
 +
|Part 1
 +
Written/clinical exam
 +
|Explain applied optics and medical physics in clinical teaching sessions Encourage/facilitate tutorials Encourage learning with optometrists
 +
|-
 +
|'''BCS6'''
 +
|Clinical Ophthalmology
 +
|Text books, Web sites Part 1/2 syllabus
 +
Skills/Wet Lab par 1,2,3
 +
|Reading Tutorials E learning Discussion forum Clinical discussions Part 2 preparation courses
 +
|Clinical discussions in work based assessments
 +
|Part 2
 +
Case based discussions Case presentations
 +
|Arrange case discussions Encourage trainees to do case presentations Provide feedback Mock OSCEs Encourage learning with neurologists, rheumatologists etc.
 +
|-
 +
|'''BCS7'''
 +
|Clinical pharmacology
 +
|Text books, Web sites Part 1 syllabus
 +
|Reading Tutorials E learning Discussion forum Clinical-pharmacological conferences
 +
|Applied science in work based assessments
 +
|Part 1
 +
Written/clinical exam
 +
|Explain clinical pharmacology in clinical teaching sessions Encourage/facilitate tutorials
 +
|-
 +
|'''BCS8'''
 +
|General medicine for ophthalmology
 +
|Text books, Web sites Part 1 syllabus Part 2 syllabus
 +
|Reading Tutorials E learning Discussion forum Clinical discussions Hospital grand rounds
 +
|Clinical discussions in work based assessments Multi source feedback
 +
|Part 1/Part 2
 +
Case based discussions Case presentations
 +
|Arrange clinical updates from non-ophthalmic colleagues Encourage trainees to do case presentations Provide feedback Mock OSCEs Encourage learning with physicians/surgeons
 +
|-
 +
|'''BCS9'''
 +
|Clinical epidemiology and EBM
 +
|Text books, Web sites Part 1/2 syllabus
 +
|Reading Tutorials E learning Discussion forum Clinical discussions Journal club research
 +
|Case presentations
 +
Publishing research
 +
|Part 2
 +
Written exam/Dissertation
 +
|Run journal clubs .Teach critical appraisal skills
 +
|-
 +
|'''BCS10'''
 +
|Instrument technology
 +
|Text books, Web sites Part 1 syllabus Part 2 syllabus
 +
|Reading Tutorials E learning Discussion forum Clinical discussions
 +
|Case presentations Clinical discussions in work based assessments Rating scales
 +
|Part 1/Part 2
 +
Case based discussions Case presentations Trust based competence assessments
 +
|Arrange teaching on instruments. Provide feedback
 +
|-
 +
|'''BCS11'''
 +
|Biostatistics
 +
|Text books, Web sites Part 1 syllabus Part 2 syllabus/Journals/Research
 +
|Reading Tutorials E learning Discussion forum Journal club Research Statistics exercises/ Workshops
 +
|Case presentations Publishing research
 +
|Part 1/Part 2
 +
Dissertation/Publications and research output
 +
|Encourage and provide research opportunities Provide feedback
 +
|-
 +
|'''BCS12'''
 +
|Clinical Genetics
 +
|Text books, Web sites Part 1
 +
|Reading Tutorials E learning Discussion forum Clinical discussions Part 2 preparation courses Genetics clinics
 +
|Clinical discussions in work based assessments Multi source feedback
 +
|Part 1/Part 2
 +
Case based discussions Case presentations
 +
|Arrange case discussions Encourage trainees to do case presentations Provide feedback Encourage learning with clinical geneticists
 +
|}
  
Every six months, the level of milestones that best describes each resident’s current performance level should be selected based on appropriate assessment methods. The suggested methods are listed after each milestone.  Thus, a variety of assessment tools must be completed every 6 months. These include oral and/or written tests, multisource feedback (360 degree assessment), observed clinical evaluations (CRS, OCEX) and assessments of procedural and surgical skill (DOPS, OSATS, OSCAR). This reporting form should be reviewed with each resident individually to give feedback regarding their progress. Completion of the milestone document will show if there are specific weaknesses in individual residents and allow early detection and hopefully successful remediation.
+
==== '''''CLINICAL ASSESSMENT­ (CA)''''' ====
  
Milestones are arranged into expectations based on progression through training and not necessary according to the year of residency.  Level 3 corresponds to the halfway point of training which will depend on the number of years of training the program has. Selection of a level implies that the resident substantially demonstrates the milestones in that level as well as those in earlier level.  (See Reporting Form diagram below.)   
+
===== Patient’s history[edit | edit source] =====
  
'''Level 1:''' The resident demonstrates milestones expected of someone at the beginning ophthalmology residency.  
+
====== Learning outcome OVERVIEW[edit | edit source] ======
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="2" |'''CLINICAL ASSESSMENT­'''
 +
|-
 +
|'''Learning Outcome'''
 +
|'''Patient’s history'''
 +
|-
 +
|Code
 +
|CA1
 +
|-
 +
|Description
 +
|Trainees must be able to gather focussed information from patients or patient caretaker in an organised way and document the clinical situation based on the individual patient’s needs.
 +
|-
 +
|Assessment
 +
|'''CRS1,portfolio/logbook and end of year review/ COECSA exams'''
 +
|-
 +
|Target Year of Achievement
 +
|Year 1  and 2
 +
|-
 +
|Related Learning Outcomes
 +
|CA1-CA12
 +
|-
 +
|Other Links
 +
|Study Guide - 3.2.1.2 below
 +
|}
  
'''Level 2:''' The resident is advancing and demonstrating year 1 milestones.  
+
====== Patient’s history Study Guide[edit | edit source] ======
 +
'''Think:'''
  
'''Level 3:''' The resident continues to advance and is demonstrating additional milestones; the resident consistently demonstrates the majority of milestones targeted for mid residency. 
+
·        Many of your communication skills will have been acquired in your foundation training. How do these skills apply to an ophthalmic patient?
 +
 
 +
·        How should I proceed when there is conflict between the history from the patient and that from relatives and careers?
 +
 
 +
·        In what situations may it be helpful to revisit the history with the patient?
 +
 
 +
·        What aids to history-taking can be used? (e.g. Questionnaires etc.?)
 +
 
 +
·        How can I be sure that I have accurately identified the patient's concerns?
 +
 
 +
'''Activity:'''
  
'''Level 4:''' The resident has advanced so that he or she now substantially demonstrates the milestones targeted for residency.  This level is designed as the graduation target. Successfully graduating residents should be achieving this level in all areas.
+
·        Observe senior colleagues and ask them to observe you
  
'''Level 5:''' The resident has advanced beyond performance targets set for residency and is demonstrating “aspirational” goals which might describe the performance of someone who has been in practice for several years.  It is expected that only a few exceptional residents will reach this level.  
+
·        With the patient's consent, video-record your consultation and discuss your performance with your trainer
  
==== '''''PORTFOLIO''''' ====
+
'''Resources:'''
The trainee's portfolio serves 2 important purposes for WBA:
 
  
* It contains all of the documents produced    through the WBA tools described above
+
·        Fred Wilson. Practical Ophthalmology; A Manual for Beginning Residents. 5<sup>th</sup> Edition. San Francisco.  American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2005
* It contains evidence that the trainee    collects to show that they have met the remaining LO in the curriculum
 
  
The trainee should regularly maintain the portfolio and use it for the following:
+
'''Self Assessment:'''
  
* To store and organize WBA documents    as they occur
+
·        Clinical Rating Form. Ask a colleague to observe your technique, complete a clinical rating form and give you feedback
* To record clinical experience (log book)
 
* To reflect upon clinical experience and plan    learning (reflective diary)
 
* To record meetings with educational    supervisor (appraisal documents)
 
* To prepare for the annual assessment    (revalidation)
 
* To record formal and informal learning    episodes (CPD document)
 
* To store audit/research/teaching activities
 
* To record any critical incidents,    complaints, guidelines (clinical governance)
 
* Any other information that supports the    trainee's ''Good Medical Practice'' e.g. letters from    patients, feedback
 
  
Specific Learning Outcomes that are assessed at the annual assessment by reviewing the portfolio are:
+
===== Vision assessment[edit | edit source] =====
  
 +
====== Learning outcome OVERVIEW[edit | edit source] ======
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="2" |'''Learning Outcome (LO)'''
+
| colspan="2" |'''CLINICAL ASSESSMENT­'''
|'''Target Year (TYA)*'''
 
|'''Example of possible evidence'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
|  PS1
+
|'''Learning Outcome'''
|Refraction
+
|'''Vision assessment'''
|2
 
|DOPS
 
 
|-
 
|-
|PS13
+
|Code
|Biometry
+
|CA2
|2
 
|DOPS
 
 
|-
 
|-
|PS14
+
|Description
|Hand Hygiene
+
|Trainees must be able: To assess visual acuity for both distance and near; to assess and interpret colour vision; to know the principles of contrast sensitivity assessment; to assess visual acuity in children and adults with barriers to communication; to assess vision outside the OPD environment and to perform and interpret confrontation visual fields.
|1
 
|MSF
 
 
|-
 
|-
|BP17
+
|Assessment
|Appraisal and 360 degree feedback
+
|'''CRS2, portfolio/logbook and end of year review/ COECSA exams'''
|2
 
|Record of discussion, MSF,
 
|-
 
|BP19
 
|Probity
 
|1
 
|Statement
 
 
|-
 
|-
|BP20
+
|Target Year of Achievement
|Practice according to National Legal  requirements
+
|Year 1 – 2
|2
 
|Record of discussion,  MSF
 
 
|-
 
|-
|BP21
+
|Related Learning Outcomes
|Data Protection
+
|CA1-CA12
|1
 
|Record of discussion
 
 
|-
 
|-
|BP22
+
|Other Links
|Human Tissue
+
|Study Guide  3.2.2.2 below
|2
+
|}
|Record of discussion
+
 
 +
====== Vision assessment STUDY GUIDE[edit | edit source] ======
 +
'''Think:'''
 +
 
 +
·        What is meant by 'visual acuity'?
 +
 
 +
·        What are the various related tests done in assessment of vision?
 +
 
 +
·        How do you assess vision in children or people with learning or communication difficulties?
 +
 
 +
·        How do you assess vision away from the eye clinic?
 +
 
 +
·        How can colour vision be assessed?
 +
 
 +
·        When is it appropriate to test colour vision?
 +
 
 +
·        Which test is best used for the different causes of impaired colour vision?
 +
 
 +
'''Knowledge:'''
 +
 
 +
·        Understanding the underlying principles, benefits and pitfalls of visual acuity assessment methods including Snellen, logMAR Sheridan-Gardner etc.
 +
 
 +
'''Activity:'''
 +
 
 +
•        Ask your orthoptist if you can participate in an orthoptist clinic assessing children’s vision
 +
 
 +
'''Resources:'''
 +
 
 +
•        Fred Wilson. Practical Ophthalmology; A Manual for Beginning Residents. 5<sup>th</sup> Edition. San Francisco.  American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2005
 +
 
 +
===== External eye examination[edit | edit source] =====
 +
 
 +
====== Learning outcome OVERVIEW[edit | edit source] ======
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="2" |'''CLINICAL ASSESSMENT­'''
 +
|-
 +
|'''Learning Outcome'''
 +
|'''External eye examination'''
 
|-
 
|-
|BP23
+
|Code
|Child Protection and safeguarding
+
|CA3
|2
 
|Record of discussion
 
 
|-
 
|-
|BP30
+
|Description
|Personal Health
+
|Trainees must be able to perform an examination of the external eye – (sclera & cornea), ocular adnexae, eyelids, and orbits and face using appropriate equipment/instruments. They must be able to carry out further examination utilizing other techniques as indicated.
|1
 
|Statement
 
 
|-
 
|-
|  PS8
+
|Assessment
|Ocular surface foreign body
+
|'''CRS3, portfolio/logbook and end of year review/ COECSA exams'''
|1
 
|DOPS forms
 
 
|-
 
|-
|  PS7
+
|Target Year of Achievement
|corneal  scrape
+
|Year 1 – 2
|1
 
|DOPS forms
 
 
|-
 
|-
|  SS2
+
|Related Learning Outcomes
|Operating Microscope
+
|CA1-CA12
|1
 
|OSATS forms
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
==== '''''QUALITY ASSURANCE''''' ====
+
====== External eye examination STUDY GUIDE[edit | edit source] ======
In order to ensure that trainees have undergone the same training, quality assurance (QA) tools will be demanded at the end of the training programme as part of the assessment.
+
'''Resources:'''
  
 +
·Fred Wilson. Practical Ophthalmology; A Manual for Beginning Residents. 5<sup>th</sup> Edition. San Francisco. American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2005
  
== '''APPENDIX''' ==
+
'''Self Assessment:'''
  
==== '''''ThE COECSA MILESTONES''''' ====
+
·Clinical Rating Form. Ask a colleague to observe your technique, complete a clinical rating form and give you feedback.
  
'''Milestone Reporting'''
+
===== PUPIL EXAMINATION[edit | edit source] =====
 
 
This section presents milestones designed for programs to use in semi-annual review of resident performance. Milestones are knowledge, skills, attitudes, and other attributes organized in a developmental framework from less to more advanced.  They are descriptors and targets for resident performance as the resident moves from entry into residency through graduation.  These milestones were adapted from the ACGME Milestones used for residency training in the USA facilitated by the International Council of Ophthalmology and Orbis International. Each of the COECSA sub-domains of performance have been mapped to the milestones. The original ACGME milestone language has been modified when necessary to reflect practice in the COECSA region and correspond to the COECSA Curriculum.  
 
  
 +
====== ­ LEARNING outcome OVERVIEW[edit | edit source] ======
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="2" |'''CLINICAL ASSESSMENT­'''
 +
|-
 +
|'''Learning Outcome'''
 +
|'''Examine the pupil and perform appropriate diagnostic pharmacological tests'''
 +
|-
 +
|Code
 +
|CA4
 +
|-
 +
|Description
 +
|Trainees must be able to assess the pupil for abnormalities of shape, size and reactions and interpret their findings. They must know how to perform and interpret appropriate pharmacological tests for specific pupil abnormalities.
 +
|-
 +
|Assessment
 +
|'''CRS4, portfolio/logbook and end of year review/ COECSA exams'''
 +
|-
 +
|Target Year of Achievement
 +
|Year 1 – 2
 +
|-
 +
|Related Learning Outcomes
 +
|CA1-CA12
 +
|-
 +
|Other Links
 +
|Study Guide -3.2.4.2 below
 +
|}
  
Every six months, the level of milestones that best describes each resident’s current performance level should be selected based on appropriate assessment methods. The suggested methods are listed after each milestone.  Thus, a variety of assessment tools must be completed every 6 months. These include oral and/or written tests, multisource feedback (360 degree assessment), observed clinical evaluations (CRS, OCEX) and assessments of procedural and surgical skill (DOPS, OSATS, OSCAR). This reporting form should be reviewed with each resident individually to give feedback regarding their progress. Completion of the milestone document will show if there are specific weaknesses in individual residents and allow early detection and hopefully successful remediation.
+
====== Examination of the pupils and perform diagnostic pharmacological tests STUDY GUIDE[edit | edit source] ======
 +
'''Think:'''
  
 +
* ·What are the pupillary pathways?
 +
* ·What does a normal pupil look like?
 +
* ·What are the causes of an abnormal pupil?
  
Milestones are arranged into expectations based on progression through training and not necessary according to the year of residency.  Level 3 corresponds to the halfway point of training which will depend on the number of years of training the program has. Selection of a level implies that the resident substantially demonstrates the milestones in that level as well as those in earlier level.  (See Reporting Form diagram below.)
+
'''Resources:'''
  
   
+
* ·Kline LB, Bajandas FJ. The Pupil. ''Neuro-ophthalmology Review Manual. 5th ed. 2004''
 +
* ·American Academy of Ophthalmology. Pupil. ''Neuro-ophthalmology. 1997.''
 +
* ·Fred Wilson. Practical Ophthalmology; A Manual for Beginning Residents. 5<sup>th</sup> Edition. San Francisco. American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2005.
  
'''Level 1:''' The resident demonstrates milestones expected of someone at the beginning ophthalmology residency.  
+
'''Self Assessment:'''
  
'''Level 2:''' The resident is advancing and demonstrating year 1 milestones.  
+
·Clinical Rating Form. Ask a colleague to observe your technique, complete a clinical rating form and give you feedback
  
'''Level 3:''' The resident continues to advance and is demonstrating additional milestones; the resident consistently demonstrates the majority of milestones targeted for mid residency. 
+
===== Ocular Motility[edit | edit source] =====
  
'''Level 4:''' The resident has advanced so that he or she now substantially demonstrates the milestones targeted for residency.  This level is designed as the graduation target. Successfully graduating residents should be achieving this level in all areas.
+
====== Learning outcome OVERVIEW[edit | edit source] ======
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="2" |'''CLINICAL ASSESSMENT­'''
 +
|-
 +
|'''Learning Outcome'''
 +
|'''Ocular Motility'''
 +
|-
 +
|Code
 +
|CA5
 +
|-
 +
|Description
 +
|Trainees must be able: to perform and interpret cover tests; to assess and interpret ocular movements; to perform prism cover tests and to describe nystagmus if present.
 +
|-
 +
|Assessment
 +
|'''CRS5, portfolio/logbook and end of year review/ COECSA exams'''
 +
|-
 +
|Target Year of Achievement
 +
|Year 1 – 2
 +
|-
 +
|Related Learning Outcomes
 +
|CA1-CA12
 +
|-
 +
|Other Links
 +
|Study Guide -3.2.5.2 below
 +
|}
  
'''Level 5:''' The resident has advanced beyond performance targets set for residency and is demonstrating “aspirational” goals which might describe the performance of someone who has been in practice for several years.  It is expected that only a few exceptional residents will reach this level.  
+
====== Perform a cover test and assess ocular motility STUDY GUIDE[edit | edit source] ======
 +
'''Think:'''
 +
 
 +
·What are the actions of the extraocular muscles?
 +
 
 +
·This is an examination technique that requires a lot of practice
 +
 
 +
·What are the implications of the different types of nystagmus?
 +
 
 +
'''Activity:'''
 +
 
 +
·Spend time with your orthoptist and ask to participate in their clinics or the strabismus clinics.
 +
 
 +
'''Resources:'''
  
===== '''COECSA Milestones Template Description''' =====
+
·Rowe F. ''Clinical Orthoptics. Blackwell; 2004.''
  
 +
·MacEwen CJ, Gregson RMC. ''Manual of Strabismus Surgery. 1st ed. Butterworth Heinemann; 2001.''
  
The diagram below presents an example set of milestones for one sub-competency in the same format as the milestone report worksheet.  For each reporting period, a resident’s performance on the milestones for each sub-competency will be indicated by:
+
·''<nowiki>http://www.mrcophth.com/videosonclinicalexamination</nowiki>''
  
 +
·Fred Wilson. Practical Ophthalmology; A Manual for Beginning Residents. 5<sup>th</sup> Edition. San Francisco. American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2005
  
·        selecting the level of milestones that best describes the resident’s performance in relation to the milestones
+
'''Self Assessment:'''
  
Or
+
·Clinical Rating Form. Ask a colleague to observe your technique, complete a clinical rating form and give you feedback.
  
·        selecting the “Has not Achieved pre-residency level” option
+
===== IOP measurement using various tonometers[edit | edit source] =====
  
 +
====== Learning outcome OVERVIEW[edit | edit source] ======
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
|Each COECSA    curriculum Sub-domain is mapped to the appropriate milestone here    
+
| colspan="2" |'''CLINICAL ASSESSMENT­'''
 +
|-
 +
|'''Learning Outcome'''
 +
|'''IOP measurement using various Tonometers'''
 +
|-
 +
|Code
 +
|CA6
 +
|-
 +
|Description
 +
|Trainees must be able to measure IOP accurately using a variety of tonometers and understand the limitations of each. They must be able to check the calibration of the tonometer.
 +
|-
 +
|Assessment
 +
|'''CRS6, portfolio/logbook and end of year review/ COECSA exams'''
 +
|-
 +
|Target Year of Achievement
 +
|Year 1 – 2
 +
|-
 +
|Related Learning Outcomes
 +
|CA1-CA12
 
|}
 
|}
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="14" |'''PC-1 Patient Interview'''
 
  
'''COECSA CA1, CA10'''
+
====== Measure intraocular pressure using applanation tonometry STUDY GUIDE[edit | edit source] ======
|-
+
'''Think:'''
|'''Has  not achieved Level 1'''
+
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level  1'''
+
·How would I feel if I were the patient having applanation done for the first time, and how can I help them to relax appropriately?
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level  3'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level  5'''
 
|-
 
|NA for PC-1
 
  
 +
·What can make the measurement of IOP less accurate? - How can I ensure the most accurate result possible?
  
{| class="wikitable"
+
·What factors should influence my interpretation of the result?
|Filling      this box at the first assessment means the trainee has made no progress      since enrolment
 
|}
 
<span lang="EN-ZA">COECSA Milestones Template
 
Description</span>
 
| colspan="2" |1.  Obtains and documents  basic history for ophthalmic complaint
 
| colspan="3" |1.  Acquires accurate and relevant problem-focused history  for common ocular complaints
 
  
 +
·In what situations should I be wary of performing applanation?
  
2.  Obtains and integrates outside medical records
+
·What damage could applanation cause to the patient?
  
 +
'''Activity:'''
  
| colspan="3" |1. Obtains relevant historical subtleties including paediatric  milestones in children that inform and prioritize both differential diagnoses  and diagnostic plans, including sensitive, complicated, and detailed  information that may not often be volunteered by the patient
+
·Watch senior colleagues and discuss the nuances of their technique
| colspan="3" |1.  Demonstrates role  model interview techniques to obtain subtle and reliable information from the  patient for junior members of the healthcare team, particularly for sensitive  aspects of ocular conditions
 
| colspan="2" |1.  Incorporates new information from literature to tailor interview  questions
 
  
 +
'''Resources:'''
  
 +
·''<nowiki>http://www.opt.indiana.edu/riley/HomePage/new_Goldmann_tonometry/2Goldmann_Tonometry.html</nowiki>''
  
 +
·Fred Wilson. Practical Ophthalmology; A Manual for Beginning Residents. 5<sup>th</sup> Edition. San Francisco. American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2005
  
 +
===== Slit lamp examination[edit | edit source] =====
  
 +
====== Learning outcome OVERVIEW[edit | edit source] ======
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="2" |'''CLINICAL ASSESSMENT­'''
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|'''Learning Outcome'''
|
+
|'''Slit Lamp Examination'''
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|Code
| colspan="13" |
+
|CA7
{| class="wikitable"
+
|-
|Selecting      a response box on the line in between levels indicates that milestones in      lower levels have been substantially demonstrated as well as '''some'''     milestones in the higher levels.
+
|Description
|}
+
|Trainees must be able to examine the eye and adnexae using the slit lamp and interpret their findings. They must know the indications for and uses of different kinds of illumination and filters. They must know the proper care and economical use of the instrument.
Comments:            
+
|-
 +
|Assessment
 +
|'''CRS7, portfolio/logbook and end of year review/ COECSA exams'''
 +
|-
 +
|Target Year of Achievement
 +
|Year 1 – 2
 +
|-
 +
|Related Learning Outcomes
 +
|CA1-CA12
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|Other Links
|
+
|Study Guide -3.2.7.2 below
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
 
|}
 
|}
{| class="wikitable"
 
|Selecting a    response box in the middle of a level implies that milestones in that year    and in lower levels have been substantially demonstrated.    
 
|}
 
Assessment method indicated here
 
  
===== '''COMPLETE LIST OF COECSA MILESTONES''' =====
+
====== Slit lamp biomicroscopy EXAMINATION STUDY GUIDE[edit | edit source] ======
'''PATIENT CARE AND PROCEDURAL SKILLS'''
+
'''Think:'''
 +
 
 +
·It is important to know exactly how the slit lamp and its accessories work
  
Residents must be able to provide patient care that is compassionate, appropriate, and effective for the treatment of health problems and the promotion of health. Residents must demonstrate competency in:
+
'''Activity:'''
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="14" |'''PC-1 Patient Interview'''  
 
  
'''COECSA CA1, CA10'''
+
·Make sure that you can use the  hand held and the table-mounted slit lamp microscope
|-
 
|'''Has not'''
 
  
'''Achieved'''
+
·Ask a senior to observe and confirm your gonioscopic technique and findings
  
'''Level 1'''
+
·Get a senior colleague to show you and the instruction manuals are a useful resource!
| colspan="2" |'''Level  1'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level  3'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level  5'''
 
|-
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |1.  Obtains and documents  basic history for ophthalmic complaint
 
| colspan="3" |1.  Acquires accurate and relevant problem-focused history  for common ocular complaints
 
  
 +
'''Resources:'''
  
2.   Obtains and integrates outside medical records
+
·Fred Wilson. Practical Ophthalmology; A Manual for Beginning Residents. 5<sup>th</sup> Edition. San Francisco. American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2005
  
 +
===== Fundoscopy[edit | edit source] =====
  
| colspan="3" |1. Obtains relevant historical subtleties including paediatric  milestones in children that inform and prioritize both differential diagnoses  and diagnostic plans, including sensitive, complicated, and detailed  information that may not often be volunteered by the patient
+
====== Learning outcome[edit | edit source] ======
| colspan="3" |1Demonstrates role  model interview techniques to obtain subtle and reliable information from the patient for junior members of the healthcare team, particularly for sensitive  aspects of ocular conditions
+
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="2" |1.   Incorporates new information from literature to tailor interview  questions
+
| colspan="2" |'''CLINICAL ASSESSMENT­'''
 +
|-
 +
|'''Learning Outcome'''
 +
|'''Fundoscopy'''
 +
|-
 +
|Code
 +
|CA8
 +
|-
 +
|Description
 +
|Trainees must be able to examine the fundus using a direct and indirect ophthalmoscope, and slit lamp biomicroscopy (with contact and non-contact lenses)They must understand the optics of the techniques and the resulting images.  They must be able to examine the peripheral retina with indentation
 +
|-
 +
|Assessment
 +
|CRS8a CRS8b CRS8c CRS8d   end of year exams, COECSA Exams
 +
|-
 +
|Target Year of Achievement
 +
|Year 1 – 2 yr program/ Year 3/4 yr program
 +
|-
 +
|Related Learning Outcomes
 +
|CA1-CA12
 +
|-
 +
|Other Links
 +
|Study Guide -3.2.8.2 below
 +
|}
  
 +
====== FUNDOSCOPY STUDY GUIDE[edit | edit source] ======
 +
'''Think:'''
  
 +
·Is pupil dilation necessary to achieve adequate examination?
  
 +
·Scleral indentation is a skill that takes a lot of practice
  
 +
·When is it appropriate to use the different types of lenses that are available for fundus examination? How do all the techniques differ in magnification, orientation of the retinal image and field of view?
  
 +
'''Activity:'''
 +
 +
·Take as many opportunities as you can to practice
 +
 +
·Watch senior colleagues and discuss the nuances of their technique, then practice again
 +
 +
'''Resources:'''
 +
 +
·Rosenthal ML. The Technique of Binocular Indirect Ophthalmoscopy. In: Hilton GF, McLean EB, Chuang EL, editors. ''Retinal Detachment. 5th ed. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 1989: 160-203.''
 +
 +
·Fred Wilson. Practical Ophthalmology; A Manual for Beginning Residents. 5<sup>th</sup> Edition. San Francisco. American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2005
 +
 +
'''Self Assessment:'''
 +
 +
·Clinical Rating Form. Ask a colleague to observe your technique, complete a clinical rating form and give you feedback.
 +
 +
===== General Medical examination[edit | edit source] =====
 +
 +
====== Learning outcome OVERVIEW[edit | edit source] ======
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="2" |'''CLINICAL ASSESSMENT­'''
 +
|-
 +
|'''Learning Outcome'''
 +
|'''General Medical examination'''
 +
|-
 +
|Code
 +
|CA9
 +
|-
 +
|Description
 +
|Trainees must be able to perform a basic medical examination relevant to ophthalmic disease and understand the importance of their findings so as to be able to know when a patient requires appropriate referral.
 +
|-
 +
|Assessment
 +
|'''Portfolio/logbook and end of year review/exams'''
 +
|-
 +
|Target Year of Achievement
 +
|Year 1 – 2 yr program/ Year 3/4 yr program
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|Related Learning Outcomes
|
+
|CA1-CA12
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|-
 
| colspan="14" |Comments:           
 
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|Other Links
|
+
|Study Guide -3.2.9.2 below
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
 
|}
 
|}
         '''Assessment Tools''': Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="15" |'''PC-2 Patient  Examination'''
 
  
'''COECSA CA2-11'''
+
====== General medical examination STUDY GUIDE[edit | edit source] ======
|-
+
'''Think:'''
|'''Has not'''
 
  
'''Achieved'''
+
·Many of your general medical examination skills will have been developed during your foundation years. Which ophthalmological problems would prompt you to use these skills as an ophthalmologist?
  
'''Level 1'''
+
·When should I request a chaperone?
| colspan="2" |'''Level  1'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level  3'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level  5'''
 
|-
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |1.  Describes components of complete ophthalmic  examination
 
  
 +
'''Activity:'''
  
2.  Performs the basic parts of a screening or bedside eye examination without special equipment
+
·Offer to help a medical trainee with eye examination skills for postgraduate examinations if they will help you with your general medical examination skills (record this in your portfolio)
| colspan="3" |1.  Performs and documents a complete ophthalmic examination targeted to a  patient’s ocular complaints and medical condition
 
  
 +
'''Resources:'''
  
2.   Distinguishes between normal and abnormal findings
+
·MacLeod's Clinical Examination 11th Edition. <nowiki>ISBN 0443074046</nowiki>. April 2005. Editors: Douglas,G. Nicol,F. Robertson,C.
| colspan="3" |1.  Performs problem-focused exam and  document pertinent positive and negative findings
 
  
 +
===== Paediatric developmental examination[edit | edit source] =====
  
2.  Consistently identifies common abnormalities; may identify subtle  findings
+
====== Learning outcome Overview[edit | edit source] ======
| colspan="3" |1.  Identifies subtle or uncommon  findings of common entities and typical or common findings of rarer entities
+
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="3" |1.   Incorporates into clinical practice new literature about exam  techniques
+
| colspan="2" |'''CLINICAL ASSESSMENT­'''
 +
|-
 +
|'''Learning Outcome'''
 +
|'''Paediatric developmental exam'''
 +
|-
 +
|Code
 +
|CA10
 +
|-
 +
|Description
 +
|The trainee should be able to perform an appropriate assessment of a child’s developmental milestones, understand the associations between systemic and ophthalmic diseases and recognise when it is appropriate to seek a paediatric opinion.
 +
|-
 +
|Assessment
 +
|'''Portfolio/logbook and end of year review/exams'''
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|Target Year of Achievement
|
+
|Year 1 – 2 / Year 3-4
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="15" |Comments:           
+
|Related Learning Outcomes
 +
|CA1-CA12
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|Other Links
|
+
|Study Guide -3.2.10.2 below
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
 
|}
 
|}
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
 
  
{| class="wikitable"
+
====== Paediatric and developmental examination STUDY GUIDE[edit | edit source] ======
| colspan="5" |'''PC-2A Vision Testing & Low Vision'''
+
'''Think:'''
 +
 
 +
* ·What developmental milestones would you expect a two year old have?
 +
* ·What key areas should be examined in a child concerning their development?
 +
* ·when should a paediatric specialist’s opinion be sought
 +
 
 +
'''Activity:'''
  
'''COECSA CA2, PM7,  PM10, PM11, PS1'''
+
·Offer to help a paediatric trainee with eye examination skills for postgraduate examinations if they will help you with your paediatric examination skills (record this in your portfolio)
|-
 
|'''Level  1'''
 
|'''Level 2'''
 
|'''Level  3'''
 
|'''Level 4'''
 
|'''Level  5'''
 
|-
 
|1. Check visual  acuity (VA) in each eye with  a near card and perform  confrontation visual field testing
 
|1. Accurately measure  and document VA, routine  refractive errors,  and color and field deficits, including Amsler grid
 
  
2. Recognize when low  vision services are needed
+
'''Resources:'''
|1. Perform  more difficult refractions; use retinoscopy to refine  technique and diagnose
 
  
2. Ability to  prescribe glasses and contact lenses appropriately
+
·MacLeod's Clinical Examination 11th Edition. <nowiki>ISBN 0443074046</nowiki>. April 2005. Editors: Douglas,G. Nicol,F. Robertson,C.
  
2.  Describe types of low vision devices.
+
===== Neurological examination[edit | edit source] =====
|1. Perform  complicated refractions, including post-operative; apply  specialized visual  tests (e.g., vertical prism  test for non-organic visual  loss)
 
|1. Develop  advanced techniques for measuring vision in unusual circumstances
 
|-
 
| colspan="5" |                                                                                                              
 
|-
 
| colspan="5" |Comments:           
 
|}
 
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
 
  
 +
====== Learning outcome Overview[edit | edit source] ======
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="7" |'''PC-2B External'''
+
| colspan="2" |'''CLINICAL ASSESSMENT­'''
 
+
|-
'''COECSA CA3'''
+
|'''Learning Outcome'''
 +
|'''Perform a focused neurological examination taking into account the associations between systemic and ophthalmic diseases'''
 
|-
 
|-
|'''Level  1'''
+
|Code
|'''Level 2'''
+
|CA11
|'''Level  3'''
+
|-
|'''Level 4'''
+
|Description
| colspan="2" |'''Level  4'''
+
|Trainees must be able to perform a basic neurological assessment with particular emphasis on the cranial nerves and conditions relevant to ophthalmic disease. They must be able to recognise when serious neurological problems are present that require the opinion of a neurologist. They must be able to recognise neurological emergencies.
|'''Level  5'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
|1.  Describe components of external exam
+
|Assessment
|1.  Detect obvious abnormalities (e.g.,  ptosis, exophthalmos); assess 5<sup>th</sup> and 7th cranial  nerve function
+
|'''Portfolio/logbook and end of year review/exams'''
|1.  Identify less obvious  abnormalities (e.g., mild ptosis,  lid retraction, globe dystopia)
 
| colspan="2" |1.  Detect or verify  most subtle abnormalities;  confirm presence or absence  of pertinent disease-specific findings  (e.g., floppy lid, subtle retropulsion resistance)
 
| colspan="2" |1.  Develop advanced techniques  for assessing external exam findings  in unusual circumstances
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="7" |                                                                                                                  
+
|Target Year of Achievement
 +
|Year 1 – 2 yr program/ Year 3/4 yr program
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="7" |Comments:           
+
|Related Learning Outcomes
 +
|CA1-CA12
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|Other Links
|
+
|Study Guide -3.2.11.2 below
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
 
|}
 
|}
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
+
 
 +
====== Perform a focused neurological examination STUDY GUIDE  [edit | edit source] ======
 +
'''Think:'''
 +
 
 +
·Many neurological problems present to the ophthalmologist and a competent neurological assessment of patients is required
 +
 
 +
'''Activity:'''
 +
 
 +
* ·Arrange sessions with your local neurology/neurosurgical department in their clinics or ward rounds to develop your examination skills
 +
* ·Offer to help a medical trainee with eye examination skills for postgraduate examinations if they will help you with your neurological examination skills (record this in your portfolio)
 +
 
 +
'''Resources:'''
 +
 
 +
·MacLeod's Clinical Examination 11th Edition. <nowiki>ISBN 0443074046</nowiki>. April 2005. Editors: Douglas,G. Nicol,F. Robertson,C.
 +
 
 +
===== Differential diagnosis[edit | edit source] =====
 +
 
 +
====== Learning outcome Overview[edit | edit source] ======
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="5" |'''PC-2C Ocular Motility/Orthoptic Evaluation'''
+
| colspan="2" |'''CLINICAL ASSESSMENT­'''
 
+
|-
'''COECSA CA5, PI1, PS12'''
+
|'''Learning Outcome'''
 +
|'''Formulate a differential diagnosis'''
 +
|-
 +
|Code
 +
|CA12
 +
|-
 +
|Description
 +
|Trainees must be able to formulate and justify an appropriate differential diagnosis for a patient as part of the management plan.  They must be able to identify the most likely diagnosis and initiate management.  They must consider the common conditions as well as the rare but important ones in the differential diagnosis.
 
|-
 
|-
|'''Level  1'''
+
|Assessment
|'''Level 2'''
+
|'''CbD, Portfolio/logbook and end of year review/exams'''
|'''Level  3'''
 
|'''Level 4'''
 
|'''Level  5'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
|1.  Describe components of ocular motility  exam; test versions  and ductions
+
|Target Year of Achievement
|1.  Accurately test and record ductions, versions, saccadic  and pursuit movements; detect obvious ocular  misalignment; identify  nystagmus
+
|Year 1 – 2 yr program/ Year 3/4 yr program
|1.  Accurately measure alignment with prisms; detect less obvious  misalignment; distinguish phoria  and tropia, perform forced ductions
 
|1.  Detect or verify  subtle motility  abnormalities; classify common nystagmus patterns
 
|1.  Recognize and classify complex eye movement abnormalities at  subspecialty level
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="5" |                                                                                                            
+
|Related Learning Outcomes
 +
|CA1-CA12
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="5" |Comments:           
+
|Other Links
 +
|Study Guide -3.2.12.2 below
 
|}
 
|}
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
 
  
 +
====== DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS STUDY GUIDE[edit | edit source] ======
 +
'''Activity:'''
 +
 +
* ·Make it routine at the end of a consultation to document a differential diagnosis.
 +
* ·Make sure that you discuss your differential diagnosis during CbD
 +
 +
'''Resources:'''
 +
 +
* The Wills Eye Manual: Office and Emergency Room Diagnosis and treatment of Eye Disease. Kunimoto et al. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins (2004)
 +
* Oxford Textbook of Ophthalmology. Easty and Sparrow. Oxford Medical Publications (1999)
 +
 +
'''Assessments:'''
 +
 +
* ·Case based discussions
 +
* ·Part 1 COECSA
 +
* ·Part 2 COECSA. OSCE
 +
 +
===== Gonioscopy[edit | edit source] =====
 +
 +
====== Learning outcome OVERVIEW[edit | edit source] ======
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="5" |'''PC-2D Pupils'''
+
| colspan="2" |'''CLINICAL ASSESSMENT'''
 
+
|-
'''COECSA CA4'''
+
|'''Learning Outcome'''
 +
|'''Gonioscopy'''
 +
|-
 +
|Code
 +
|CA13
 
|-
 
|-
|'''Level  1'''
+
|Description
|'''Level 2'''
+
|Trainees must be able to perform gonioscopy with an indirect gonioscopy lens, identify anterior chamber angle anatomy and interpret the clinical significance of their findings.  They should be able to use the major angle grading systems clinically.
|'''Level  3'''
+
|-
|'''Level 4'''
+
|Assessment
|'''Level  5'''
+
|'''CRS13, portfolio/logbook and end of year review/ COECSA exams'''
 
|-
 
|-
|1. Describe components of pupil testing, including test for relative  afferent pupillary defect  (RAPD)
+
|Target Year of Achievement
|1. Accurately  grade pupil size and  reactivity; detect  obvious asymmetry and RAPD
+
|Year 1 – 2
|1. Detect less obvious abnormalities (e.g., mild RAPD,  efferent defect, sympathetic denervation); perform and  interpret pharmacologic testing
 
|1. Detect or verify subtle abnormalities (e.g.,  light-near dissociation); search  for associated neurologic findings;  (e.g., lid or motility abnormalities)
 
|1. Recognize  and classify pupillary  abnormalities at subspecialty level
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="5" |                                                                                                                                                          
+
|Related Learning Outcomes
 +
|CA1 - CA12
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="5" |Comments:           
+
|Other Links
 +
|Study Guide -3.2.13.2 below
 
|}
 
|}
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
 
  
{| class="wikitable"
+
====== Gonioscopy Study Guide  [edit | edit source] ======
| colspan="5" |'''PC-2E Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy'''
+
'''Think:'''
 +
 
 +
* ·Why is gonioscopy physically required to see the angle and why is it needed clinically?
 +
* ·How would I feel if I were the patient having gonioscopy done for the first time, and how can I help them to relax appropriately?
 +
* ·What are the major classes of gonioscopy lenses and how do their uses differ?
 +
* ·What are the anatomic landmarks of the angle?
 +
* ·What landmark can be identified using the corneal light wedge technique?
 +
* ·How can one distinguish an open angle from a closed angle?
 +
* ·What is dynamic gonioscopy and when does it help you assess the angle?
 +
* ·What are the major grading systems used in evaluating/reporting the angle?
 +
* ·In what situations should I be wary of performing gonioscopy?
 +
* ·What damage could gonioscopy cause to the patient?
 +
 
 +
'''Activity:'''
 +
 
 +
* ·Watch senior colleagues and discuss the nuances of their technique.
 +
* ·Perform gonioscopy on all glaucoma patients.
 +
* ·Perform the corneal light wedge technique to identify Schwalbe’s line.
 +
* ·Perform dynamic gonioscopy with an indirect Posner, Sussman or Zeiss style lens.
  
'''COECSA CA7'''
+
'''Resources:'''
|-
 
|'''Level  1'''
 
|'''Level 2'''
 
|'''Level  3'''
 
|'''Level 4'''
 
|'''Level  5'''
 
|-
 
|1.  Describe components of slit lamp exam; identify corneal abrasion
 
|1.  Identify anterior segment  structures; recognize common  corneal and conjunctival  abnormalities, iritis
 
|1.  Recognize less obvious  abnormalities (e.g.,  corneal edema, endothelial loss, dysplasia)
 
|1.  Detect or verify subtle abnormalities (e.g.,  corneal thinning); search  for associated findings  (e.g., orbital signs)
 
|1.  Recognize and classify anterior segment abnormalities at  subspecialty level
 
|-
 
| colspan="5" |                                                                                                                    
 
|-
 
| colspan="5" |Comments:           
 
|}
 
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
 
  
{| class="wikitable"
+
* ·''Alward, W. L. M. (2007) Atlas of Gonioscopy. gonioscopy.org''
| colspan="5" |'''PC-2F Gonioscopy'''
+
* ·''eyewiki.aao.org/Gonioscopy''
|-
+
* ·''American Academy of Ophthalmology, Glaucoma, Section 10. Basic and Clinical Science Course. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2014:38-42.''
|'''Level  1'''
 
|'''Level 2'''
 
|'''Level  3'''
 
|'''Level 4'''
 
|'''Level  5'''
 
|-
 
|1.  Describe purpose of gonioscopy
 
|1.  Describe principles and indications, and properly perform basic  techniques of gonioscopy
 
  
 +
== '''ASSESSMENTS''' ==
  
2.  Recognize normal angle  structure; identify angle closure
+
==== '''''Assessments Overview''''' ====
|1.  Grade more questionable angles  using compression and lens tilting; identify more subtle features  (e.g., neovascularization, recession,  synechiae)
+
''Broadly speaking'' the learning outcomes for each domain of clinical practice are assessed as follows:
|1. Perform in technically difficult examinations; detect or verify  subtle abnormalities (e.g.,  pigmentation, plateau iris)
+
{| class="wikitable"
|1.  Recognize and classify gonioscopic abnormalities at subspecialty level
+
|
 +
|Domain of Practice
 +
|Assessment
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="5" |                                                                                                              
+
|'''BCS'''
 +
|Basic and  clinical sciences
 +
|Part 1  COECSA, Part 2 COECSA exams
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="5" |Comments:           
+
|'''CA'''
|}
+
|Clinical assessment
'''Assessment Tools'''Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
+
|WpBA*rating  scales, Part 2 COECSA exams
 
+
|-
{| class="wikitable"
+
|'''PI'''
| colspan="5" |'''PC-2G Tonometry'''
+
|Patient investigation
 
+
|WpBA*rating  scales, Part 2 COECSA exams
'''COECSA CA6'''
+
|-
 +
|'''PM'''
 +
|Patient  management
 +
|WpBA*rating  scales ,Part 2 COECSA exams
 
|-
 
|-
|'''Level 1'''
+
|'''PS'''
|'''Level 2'''
+
|Practical  skills
|'''Level 3'''
+
|WpBA*rating  scales ,Part 2 COECSA exams
|'''Level 4'''
 
|'''Level 5'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
|1. Describe applanation technique of measuring intraocular pressure
+
|'''SS'''
|1. Accurately measure intraocular pressure in routine patients using applanation
+
|Surgical skills
|
+
|WpBA*rating scales, Part 2 COECSA exams
|1. Combine or modify techniques in patients with abnormal corneas or limited cooperation  (e.g., Tono-Pen, average Goldmann  readings 90 degrees  apart)
 
|1. Develop  advanced techniques for measuring intraocular pressure in unusual circumstances
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="5" |                                                                                                              
+
|'''CEH'''
 +
|Community eye  health
 +
|WpBA*rating  scales ,Part 2 COECSA exams
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="5" |Comments:           
+
|'''Com'''
|}
+
|Communication
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
+
|WpBA*rating scales ,Part 2 COECSA exams
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="5" |'''PC-2H Ophthalmoscopy (Direct and Indirect)'''
 
 
 
'''COECSA CA8'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
|'''Level 1'''
+
|'''BP'''
|'''Level 2'''
+
|Best  practice
|'''Level 3'''
+
|WpBA*rating  scales
|'''Level 4'''
 
|'''Level 5'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
|1.  Identify optic nerve using direct ophthalmoscopy
+
|'''ML'''
 +
|Management and leadership
 +
|WpBA*rating  scales
 +
|}
  
 +
==== '''''EXAMINATIONS''''' ====
  
2Estimate  optic nerve cup-disc ratio
+
'''A.     Summative assessment in Ophthalmology residency'''
|1.  Perform slit  lamp indirect ophthalmoscopy
 
  
 +
To qualify as an ophthalmologist under COECSA, a candidate must pass:
  
2.  Recognize  normal optic nerve and retinal appearance; detect obvious abnormalities  (e.g., optic atrophy, papilledema, retinal detachment)
+
* ¨  Basic sciences exam ( Part1)
|1.  Perform slit  lamp ophthalmoscopy with the Hruby, +78, +90 lenses, 3- mirror contact lens,  and trans-equator (pan- funduscopic) contact lens
+
* ¨  Refraction and Optics (intermediate)
 +
* ¨  Ophthalmic medicine and Ophthalmic surgery exam( Part 2)
 +
* ¨  Clinical final exam
 +
* ¨  (Dissertation/Publication)
  
2.  Detect less  obvious abnormalities (e.g., early glaucomatous excavation, macular  degeneration, large retinal tear)
 
  
3Perform  indirect ophthalmoscopy and peripheral retinal examination
+
'''B.      Exams: Part 1 (Visual/Basic Sciences & Refraction and Optics)'''
|1. Detect or verify  subtle abnormalities and unusual presentations (e.g., mild maculopathy,  shallow detachment, subtle tear); perform scleral depression
 
|1. Recognize and  classify complex optic disc and retino-vitreous abnormalities at subspecialty  level
 
|-
 
| colspan="5" |                                                                                                                  
 
|-
 
| colspan="5" |Comments:            
 
|}
 
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
 
  
{| class="wikitable"
+
* ¨  COECSA Part 1: ideally done during the first year of training. In the interim period, COECSA has opted to use ICO part one for convenience. The standards of ICO exams are universally accepted and a good number of residents are already sitting it in the region.
| colspan="14" |'''PC-3 Diagnostic Procedures &  Instruments'''
+
* ¨  ICO Part 1 will be adopted as COECSA part 1 till April 2021.
 +
* ¨  The University MMed part 1 will be accepted as equivalent till end of 2019
 +
* ¨  In 2020, COECSA senate shall assess the value of ICO exams for COECSA, and decide whether to continue or set own?
 +
* ¨   From March 2022, COECSA will have its own part 1 exam if a decision to go that route is taken.
 +
* ¨  Further, COECSA Optics and refraction exam will also be the ICO exam from April 2019 until April 2022.
 +
* ¨   COECSA will have its own exam intermediate exam (Optics) from March 2023
 +
* ¨  MMed Optics and Refraction (if any), will be accepted as equivalent till End of December 2020
  
COECSA BCS10, PI7
 
|-
 
|'''Has not'''
 
  
'''Achieved'''
+
'''C.       Exams: Part 2 (Opth medicine and surgery)'''
  
'''Level 1'''
+
* ¨  COECSA Ophthalmic Medicine and surgery part 2 exam will be the ICO exam from April 2021 till March 2024.
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
+
* ¨  MMed part 2 exam will be accepted as equivalent till end of 2021.
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
+
* ¨  From April 2025, COECSA will have its own part 2 exam subject to College Senate decision
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
|-
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |1.  Describes role of office   diagnostic procedures in diagnosis of  ophthalmic disease
 
  
 +
'''D.      Clinical Final Exam'''
  
 +
* ¨  The current COECSA Fellowship Exam will remain as the final exit Clinical Exam
  
| colspan="3" |1.  Selects and/or performs appropriate  routine diagnostic tests and imaging procedures based on patient’s ocular complaints  and medical condition
+
==== '''''Target Year of Achievement (TYA)''''' ====
| colspan="3" |1.  Interprets routine findings.  Recognize indications for advanced  diagnostic tests and imaging procedures
+
'''These are summarized as follows:'''
| colspan="3" |1.  Interprets  unusual findings, identify artifacts. Employ routine and advanced diagnostic  tests and imaging procedures according to evidence based medicine
+
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="2" |1.  Selects diagnostic  procedures in a cost-effective manner
+
|'''TYA'''
 
+
|'''Explanation'''
 
+
|'''Example'''
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|Year 1
|
+
|This LO must normally be achieved '''during  the first year''' of training and by the '''end of year 1 at the  latest'''.
| colspan="2" |
+
|CA1 (Clinical  history)
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="14" |Comments:           
+
|Year 2
 +
|This LO must normally be achieved '''during  the first or second year''' of training and by the '''end of year  2 at the latest'''. Failure to achieve a significant number of these LO  before the end of year 2 without mitigating circumstances may lead to a  trainee being removed from the training programme.
 +
|BCS (Basic &  Clinical Sciences)
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|Year 3
|
+
|This LO must normally be achieved '''during  the first three years''' of training and by the '''end of year 3  at the latest'''. Failure to achieve a significant number of these LO before  year 3 may require year 3 to be repeated.
|
+
|SS4 (Cataract)
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
 
  
{| class="wikitable"
+
PS1 (Refraction)
| colspan="13" |'''PC-3A Perimetry'''
+
|-
 +
|Year 1,2,3/4 annual review
 +
|This LO must be achieved before the end of  year 2 '''and''' will be assessed annually thereafter.
 +
|BP10-30
  
'''COECSA PI10'''
+
COM1-14
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |'''Level  1'''
+
|Year 3/4
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
+
|This LO must be achieved in order to complete  the core curriculum. It is unlikely to be achieved in the first two years of  training but may be achieved anytime during years 3/4
| colspan="3" |'''Level  3'''
+
|SS5 (surgery to lower  IOP)
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
+
|} 
| colspan="2" |'''Level  5'''
+
 
 +
==== '''''WorkPLACE BaseD Assessments''''' ====
 +
'''The following WpBA assessment tools are available for Training:'''  
 +
 
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|'''Tool'''
 +
|'''Code'''
 +
|'''Number of tools'''
 +
|'''Main Learning Outcome Domains Assessed'''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |1.  Describe role of perimetric tests to quantify and categorize visual  loss in damage  of the visual pathway
+
|Clinical Rating Scale (modified CEX)
| colspan="3" |1.  Describe fundamentals of perimetry, including  kinetic and static techniques; interpret  perimetry in routine optic  nerve and central  nervous system (CNS) disorders
+
|CRS
| colspan="3" |1.  Interpret perimetry in more  complex optic nerve  disorders, including glaucoma, and CNS disorders,  including homonymous and bitemporal  defects
+
|8
| colspan="3" |1.  Interpret complex perimetric results, including change over time,  using statistical algorithms; identify artifacts
+
|Clinical Assessment; Practical Refraction
| colspan="2" |1. Recognize and classify complex perimetric abnormalities at subspecialty level
+
|-
 +
|Case based Discussion
 +
|CbD
 +
|1
 +
|Patient Investigation; Communication; Patient Management; Best Practice; Community Eye Health; Management and Leadership; Basic and Clinical Sciences
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|Direct Observation of Procedural Skills
| colspan="2" |    
+
|DOPS
|
+
|1
| colspan="2" |
+
|Practical Skills; Communication; Patient Investigation
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |         
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="13" |Comments:           
+
|Objective Assessment of Surgical and Technical Skills
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubric
 +
|OSATS
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
OSCAR
 +
|4
 +
|Surgical Skills; Communication
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|Multi-source feedback (modified PAT)
|
+
|MSF
|
+
|1
|
+
|Communication; Best Practice
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
 
|}
 
|}
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
+
The WpBA tools are available through the website to download for completion, validation by the trainer and can be stored in a paper-based portfolio/e-portfolio (when available). Guidance is available at your institution about who should be the assessor as not all assessments need to be performed by a consultant ophthalmologist. The target year of achievement (TYA) guidance indicates when each WpBA should be achieved.
 +
 
 +
If a trainee does not complete an assessment successfully, the assessment tool will act as a useful source of feedback and allow preparation for a subsequent assessment. It therefore allows for both formative (developmental) and summative (competence) assessment. Trainees should be encouraged to undergo formative assessment regularly as part of their training and not see 'failure' at an assessment as a problem. Trainees should keep all assessment forms in their portfolio to show that they are obtaining appropriate feedback and making progress. A portfolio that only contains 'passed' assessments should be discouraged - there should be a "culture of deferred success". A variety of assessors should be used, and especially where two satisfactory assessments are required in any year these should be completed by different assessors where possible.
  
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="14" |'''PC-3B Corneal Pachymetry and Topography'''
 
  
'''COECSA PI2'''
+
'''''MILESTONES'''''
|-
+
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
+
Milestones are knowledge, skills, attitudes, and other attributes organized in a developmental framework from less to more advanced.  They are descriptors and targets for resident performance as the resident moves from entry into residency through graduation.  These milestones were adapted from the ACGME Milestones used for residency training in the USA facilitated by the International Council of Ophthalmology and Orbis International. Each of the COECSA sub-domains of performance have been mapped to the milestones. The original ACGME milestone language has been modified when necessary to reflect practice in the COECSA region and correspond to the COECSA Curriculum. 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
+
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
+
Every six months, the level of milestones that best describes each resident’s current performance level should be selected based on appropriate assessment methods. The suggested methods are listed after each milestone.  Thus, a variety of assessment tools must be completed every 6 months. These include oral and/or written tests, multisource feedback (360 degree assessment), observed clinical evaluations (CRS, OCEX) and assessments of procedural and surgical skill (DOPS, OSATS, OSCAR). This reporting form should be reviewed with each resident individually to give feedback regarding their progress. Completion of the milestone document will show if there are specific weaknesses in individual residents and allow early detection and hopefully successful remediation.
| colspan="4" |'''Level 4'''
+
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
+
Milestones are arranged into expectations based on progression through training and not necessary according to the year of residency.  Level 3 corresponds to the halfway point of training which will depend on the number of years of training the program has. Selection of a level implies that the resident substantially demonstrates the milestones in that level as well as those in earlier level.  (See Reporting Form diagram below.)   
|-
+
 
| colspan="2" |1. Describe purpose of corneal  pachymetry and topography
+
'''Level 1:''' The resident demonstrates milestones expected of someone at the beginning ophthalmology residency.  
| colspan="3" |1. Describe indications for pachymetry and tomography;  interpret basic abnormalities (e.g., irregular astigmatism, corneal thinning)
+
 
| colspan="3" |1. Perform and interpret corneal topographic and pachymetric measurements, and  apply these to  refraction, contact  lens fitting, glaucoma management
+
'''Level 2:''' The resident is advancing and demonstrating year 1 milestones.  
| colspan="4" |1. Perform and interpret advanced  corneal topographic and  pachymetric measurements, and apply these  to refractive surgery
+
 
| colspan="2" |1. Recognize and classify complex pachymetry and topography abnormalities at subspecialty level
+
'''Level 3:''' The resident continues to advance and is demonstrating additional milestones; the resident consistently demonstrates the majority of milestones targeted for mid residency. 
 +
 
 +
'''Level 4:''' The resident has advanced so that he or she now substantially demonstrates the milestones targeted for residency.  This level is designed as the graduation target. Successfully graduating residents should be achieving this level in all areas.
 +
 
 +
'''Level 5:''' The resident has advanced beyond performance targets set for residency and is demonstrating “aspirational” goals which might describe the performance of someone who has been in practice for several years.  It is expected that only a few exceptional residents will reach this level.  
 +
 
 +
==== '''''PORTFOLIO''''' ====
 +
The trainee's portfolio serves 2 important purposes for WBA:
 +
 
 +
* It contains all of the documents produced    through the WBA tools described above
 +
* It contains evidence that the trainee    collects to show that they have met the remaining LO in the curriculum
 +
 
 +
The trainee should regularly maintain the portfolio and use it for the following:
 +
 
 +
* To store and organize WBA documents    as they occur
 +
* To record clinical experience (log book)
 +
* To reflect upon clinical experience and plan    learning (reflective diary)
 +
* To record meetings with educational    supervisor (appraisal documents)
 +
* To prepare for the annual assessment    (revalidation)
 +
* To record formal and informal learning    episodes (CPD document)
 +
* To store audit/research/teaching activities
 +
* To record any critical incidents,    complaints, guidelines (clinical governance)
 +
* Any other information that supports the    trainee's ''Good Medical Practice'' e.g. letters from    patients, feedback
 +
 
 +
Specific Learning Outcomes that are assessed at the annual assessment by reviewing the portfolio are:
 +
 
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Learning Outcome (LO)'''
 +
|'''Target Year (TYA)*'''
 +
|'''Example of possible evidence'''
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|  PS1
| colspan="2" |
+
|Refraction
|
+
|2
| colspan="2" |
+
|DOPS
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="14" |Comments:           
+
|PS13
 +
|Biometry
 +
|2
 +
|DOPS
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|PS14
|
+
|Hand Hygiene
|
+
|1
|
+
|MSF
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="14" |'''PC-3C Ultrasonography &  Biometry'''
 
 
 
'''COECSA PI3,  PI9, PS13'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
+
|BP17
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
+
|Appraisal and 360 degree feedback
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
+
|2
| colspan="4" |'''Level 4'''
+
|Record of discussion, MSF,
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |1. Describe role of ultrasonography for diagnosis when ocular media  not clear
+
|BP19
| colspan="3" |1. Describe principles  of, indications for,  and techniques of ocular A- and B-scan ultrasonography
+
|Probity
| colspan="3" |1. Perform A- and B-scan and interpret basic findings (e.g.,  retinal and choroidal detachment,  axial length)
+
|1
| colspan="4" |1. Utilize  A-scan data to calculate  intraocular lens (IOL) power;  interpret complex  A- and B-scan ultrasonography  (e.g., choroidal melanoma)
+
|Statement
| colspan="2" |1. Recognize  and classify complex  ultrasonographic abnormalities at  subspecialty level
 
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|BP20
| colspan="2" |
+
|Practice according to National Legal  requirements
|
+
|2
| colspan="2" |
+
|Record of discussion,  MSF
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="14" |Comments:           
+
|BP21
 +
|Data Protection
 +
|1
 +
|Record of discussion
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|BP22
|
+
|Human Tissue
|
+
|2
|
+
|Record of discussion
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="14" |'''PC-3D Optic Coherence Tomography (OCT)/Confocal Laser Tomography  (CLT)'''
 
 
 
'''COECSA PI5'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
+
|BP23
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
+
|Child Protection and safeguarding
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
+
|2
| colspan="4" |'''Level 4'''
+
|Record of discussion
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |1. Describe purpose of OCT and CLT
+
|BP30
| colspan="3" |1. Describe principles  of, indications for,  and techniques of OCT and  CLT in analyzing retina and optic disc
+
|Personal Health
| colspan="3" |1. Interpret  basic OCT and CLT findings (e.g.,  nerve fiber layer thinning, macular edema, optic disc excavation)
+
|1
| colspan="4" |1. Interpret complex findings (e.g.,  epiretinal membranes); identify  artifacts
+
|Statement
| colspan="2" |1. Recognize  and classify complex OCT  and CLT abnormalities at subspecialty level
 
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|  PS8
| colspan="2" |
+
|Ocular surface foreign body
|
+
|1
| colspan="2" |
+
|DOPS forms
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="14" |Comments:           
+
|  PS7
 +
|corneal  scrape
 +
|1
 +
|DOPS forms
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|  SS2
|
+
|Operating Microscope
|
+
|1
|
+
|OSATS forms
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
 
|}
 
|}
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
 
  
 +
==== '''''QUALITY ASSURANCE''''' ====
 +
In order to ensure that trainees have undergone the same training, quality assurance (QA) tools will be demanded at the end of the training programme as part of the assessment.
 +
 +
 +
== '''APPENDIX''' ==
 +
 +
==== '''''ThE COECSA MILESTONES''''' ====
 +
 +
'''Milestone Reporting'''
 +
 +
This section presents milestones designed for programs to use in semi-annual review of resident performance. Milestones are knowledge, skills, attitudes, and other attributes organized in a developmental framework from less to more advanced.  They are descriptors and targets for resident performance as the resident moves from entry into residency through graduation.  These milestones were adapted from the ACGME Milestones used for residency training in the USA facilitated by the International Council of Ophthalmology and Orbis International. Each of the COECSA sub-domains of performance have been mapped to the milestones. The original ACGME milestone language has been modified when necessary to reflect practice in the COECSA region and correspond to the COECSA Curriculum.  
 +
 +
 +
Every six months, the level of milestones that best describes each resident’s current performance level should be selected based on appropriate assessment methods. The suggested methods are listed after each milestone.  Thus, a variety of assessment tools must be completed every 6 months. These include oral and/or written tests, multisource feedback (360 degree assessment), observed clinical evaluations (CRS, OCEX) and assessments of procedural and surgical skill (DOPS, OSATS, OSCAR). This reporting form should be reviewed with each resident individually to give feedback regarding their progress. Completion of the milestone document will show if there are specific weaknesses in individual residents and allow early detection and hopefully successful remediation.
 +
 +
 +
Milestones are arranged into expectations based on progression through training and not necessary according to the year of residency.  Level 3 corresponds to the halfway point of training which will depend on the number of years of training the program has. Selection of a level implies that the resident substantially demonstrates the milestones in that level as well as those in earlier level.  (See Reporting Form diagram below.)
 +
 +
   
 +
 +
'''Level 1:''' The resident demonstrates milestones expected of someone at the beginning ophthalmology residency.  
 +
 +
'''Level 2:''' The resident is advancing and demonstrating year 1 milestones.  
 +
 +
'''Level 3:''' The resident continues to advance and is demonstrating additional milestones; the resident consistently demonstrates the majority of milestones targeted for mid residency. 
 +
 +
'''Level 4:''' The resident has advanced so that he or she now substantially demonstrates the milestones targeted for residency.  This level is designed as the graduation target. Successfully graduating residents should be achieving this level in all areas.
 +
 +
'''Level 5:''' The resident has advanced beyond performance targets set for residency and is demonstrating “aspirational” goals which might describe the performance of someone who has been in practice for several years.  It is expected that only a few exceptional residents will reach this level.  
 +
 +
===== '''COECSA Milestones Template Description''' =====
 +
 +
 +
The diagram below presents an example set of milestones for one sub-competency in the same format as the milestone report worksheet.  For each reporting period, a resident’s performance on the milestones for each sub-competency will be indicated by:
 +
 +
 +
·        selecting the level of milestones that best describes the resident’s performance in relation to the milestones
 +
 +
Or
 +
 +
·        selecting the “Has not Achieved pre-residency level” option
 +
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|Each COECSA    curriculum Sub-domain is mapped to the appropriate milestone here    
 +
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="14" |'''PC-3E Fluorescein  Angiography'''
+
| colspan="14" |'''PC-1 Patient Interview'''  
  
'''COECSA PI4'''
+
'''COECSA CA1, CA10'''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
+
|'''Has  not achieved Level 1'''
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
| colspan="4" |'''Level 4'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
+
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |1. Describe role of fluorescein angiography in diagnosis of retinal and optic nerve disease
+
|NA for PC-1
| colspan="3" |1.  Describe principles of, indications for, and techniques of fluorescein angiography in analyzing the retina and  optic disc (e.g., phases of the angiogram)
+
 
 +
 
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|Filling      this box at the first assessment means the trainee has made no progress      since enrolment
 +
|}
 +
<span lang="EN-ZA">COECSA Milestones Template
 +
Description</span>
 +
| colspan="2" |1.  Obtains and documents basic history for ophthalmic complaint
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Acquires accurate and relevant problem-focused history  for common ocular complaints
 +
 
 +
 
 +
2Obtains and integrates outside medical records
 +
 
 +
 
 +
| colspan="3" |1. Obtains relevant historical subtleties including paediatric  milestones in children that inform and prioritize both differential diagnoses  and diagnostic plans, including sensitive, complicated, and detailed information that may not often be volunteered by the patient
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Demonstrates role  model interview techniques to obtain subtle and reliable information from the patient for junior members of the healthcare team, particularly for sensitive aspects of ocular conditions
 +
| colspan="2" |1.  Incorporates new information from literature to tailor interview  questions
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
  
2.  Interpret basic fluorescein angiography  in common retinal disorders (e.g., diabetic retinopathy, cystoid macular edema)
 
| colspan="3" |1. Interpret  fluorescein angiography in  less common retinal diseases
 
| colspan="4" |1. Interpret  fluorescein angiography in complex  retinal vascular and other diseases (e.g., occult  and recurrent choroidal neovascular membranes)
 
| colspan="2" |1. Recognize  and classify complex  fluorescein angiographic abnormalities at subspecialty level
 
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
Line 1,500: Line 1,927:
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
|
 
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="14" |Comments:             
+
|
 +
| colspan="13" |
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|Selecting      a response box on the line in between levels indicates that milestones in      lower levels have been substantially demonstrated as well as '''some'''      milestones in the higher levels.
 +
|}
 +
Comments:             
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
Line 1,522: Line 1,953:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
+
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|Selecting a    response box in the middle of a level implies that milestones in that year    and in lower levels have been substantially demonstrated.    
 +
|}
 +
Assessment method indicated here
 +
 
 +
===== '''COMPLETE LIST OF COECSA MILESTONES''' =====
 +
'''PATIENT CARE AND PROCEDURAL SKILLS'''
  
 +
Residents must be able to provide patient care that is compassionate, appropriate, and effective for the treatment of health problems and the promotion of health. Residents must demonstrate competency in:
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="14" |'''PC-3F  Neuroimaging (CT and MRI)'''
+
| colspan="14" |'''PC-1 Patient Interview'''  
  
'''COECSA PI6'''
+
'''COECSA CA1, CA10'''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
+
|'''Has not'''
 +
 
 +
'''Achieved'''
 +
 
 +
'''Level 1'''
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
| colspan="4" |'''Level 4'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
+
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |1. Describe basic principles of CT and  magnetic resonance (MR) imaging
+
|
| colspan="3" |1. Describe indications for neuroimaging  in ophthalmology; identify major MR sequences (e.g., T1, T2, FLAIR, fat  suppression)
+
| colspan="2" |1.  Obtains and documents basic history for ophthalmic complaint
| colspan="3" |1. Recognize normal anatomy of orbits and parasellar regions
+
| colspan="3" |1. Acquires accurate and relevant problem-focused history  for common ocular complaints
| colspan="4" |1. Identify major abnormalities (e.g., orbital and parasellar tumor, stroke, multiple sclerosis [MS] lesions)
+
 
| colspan="2" |1. Recognize and classify complex CT & MRI abnormalities at subspecialty level
+
 
 +
2.   Obtains and integrates outside medical records
 +
 
 +
 
 +
| colspan="3" |1. Obtains relevant historical subtleties including paediatric  milestones in children that inform and prioritize both differential diagnoses and diagnostic plans, including sensitive, complicated, and detailed  information that may not often be volunteered by the patient
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Demonstrates role model interview techniques to obtain subtle and reliable information from the  patient for junior members of the healthcare team, particularly for sensitive  aspects of ocular conditions
 +
| colspan="2" |1.   Incorporates new information from literature to tailor interview questions
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
Line 1,547: Line 2,002:
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
|
 
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="14" |Comments:           
+
| colspan="14" |Comments:           
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
Line 1,569: Line 2,023:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD), oral/written exams, DOPS
+
         '''Assessment Tools''': Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
 +
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="14" |'''PC-3G Ocular Lubrication Testing'''
+
| colspan="15" |'''PC-2 Patient Examination'''  
  
'''COECSA PS5'''
+
'''COECSA CA2-11'''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
+
|'''Has not'''
 +
 
 +
'''Achieved'''
 +
 
 +
'''Level 1'''
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
| colspan="4" |'''Level 4'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 5'''
|-
 
| colspan="2" |1. Describe role of office testing  to identify dry eyes
 
| colspan="3" |1. Describe indications for  and perform tests to identify dry eye  syndrome and exposure keratopathy (e.g., assessment of tear film breakup time, corneal  stain with fluorescein and rose bengal  dyes, Schirmer test)
 
| colspan="3" |
 
| colspan="4" |1. Perform diagnostic temporary  punctal occlusion
 
| colspan="2" |1. Develop  advanced techniques for quantifying ocular lubrication in unusual circumstances
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |
+
| colspan="2" |1.  Describes components of complete ophthalmic  examination
|
+
 
| colspan="2" |
+
 
|
+
2.  Performs the basic parts of a screening or bedside eye examination  without special equipment
| colspan="2" |
+
| colspan="3" |1.  Performs and documents a complete ophthalmic examination targeted to a  patient’s ocular complaints and medical condition
|
+
 
 +
 
 +
2.  Distinguishes between normal and abnormal findings
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Performs problem-focused exam and  document pertinent positive and negative findings
 +
 
 +
 
 +
2.  Consistently identifies common abnormalities; may identify subtle  findings
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Identifies subtle or uncommon  findings of common entities and typical or common findings of rarer entities
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Incorporates into clinical practice new literature about exam  techniques
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 +
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 +
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
 +
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="14" |Comments:             
+
| colspan="15" |Comments:             
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 1,615: Line 2,087:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD), oral/written exams, DOPS
+
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
  
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="14" |'''PC-4  Disease Diagnosis'''  
+
| colspan="5" |'''PC-2A Vision Testing & Low Vision'''
  
'''COECSA  BCS6, CA12, PM9, PM10'''
+
'''COECSA CA2, PM7, PM10, PM11, PS1'''
 
|-
 
|-
|'''Has not'''
+
|'''Level 1'''
 
+
|'''Level 2'''
'''Achieved'''
+
|'''Level 3'''
 
+
|'''Level 4'''
'''pre-residency'''
+
|'''Level 5'''
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|1. Check visual acuity (VA) in each eye with a near card and perform confrontation visual field testing
| colspan="2" |1.   Describes basic clinical features of common ophthalmologic disorders, e.g. red eye, glaucoma, cataract, diabetic retinopathy
+
|1. Accurately measure and document VA, routine refractive errors,  and color and field deficits, including Amsler grid
| colspan="3" |1.  Recalls and presents clinical facts of the history and basic eye exam without higher level of synthesis and generates at least one item of the differential  diagnosis for common ophthalmologic disorders
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
| colspan="3" |1.  Abstracts and reorganizes elicited clinical findings 
 
 
 
 
 
2.  Prioritizes potential causes of patient complaint; compares and contrasts diagnoses under consideration, considers manifestations of systemic diseases
 
 
 
 
 
3.  Generates more focused differential diagnosis and organized final  assessment
 
| colspan="3" |1.  Organizes clinical facts in a hierarchical level of importance.   Identify discriminating features between  similar patients
 
 
 
Incorporates most current literature  findings in formulation of differential diagnosis
 
 
 
2.  Generates focused differential and evaluation strategy to finalize  diagnosis
 
 
 
3.  Verifies diagnostic assessments of junior members of healthcare team
 
| colspan="2" |1 Continues to incorporate most current  literature findings in formulation of differential diagnosis
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 +
2. Recognize when low  vision services are needed
 +
|1. Perform  more difficult refractions; use retinoscopy to refine  technique and diagnose
  
 +
2. Ability to  prescribe glasses and contact lenses appropriately
  
 +
2.  Describe types of low vision devices.
 +
|1. Perform  complicated refractions, including post-operative; apply  specialized visual  tests (e.g., vertical prism  test for non-organic visual  loss)
 +
|1. Develop  advanced techniques for measuring vision in unusual circumstances
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="5" |                                                                                                              
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="5" |Comments:           
 +
|}
 +
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
  
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="7" |'''PC-2B External'''
  
 +
'''COECSA CA3'''
 +
|-
 +
|'''Level  1'''
 +
|'''Level 2'''
 +
|'''Level  3'''
 +
|'''Level 4'''
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Level  4'''
 +
|'''Level  5'''
 +
|-
 +
|1.  Describe components of external exam
 +
|1.  Detect obvious abnormalities (e.g.,  ptosis, exophthalmos); assess 5<sup>th</sup> and 7th cranial  nerve function
 +
|1.  Identify less obvious  abnormalities (e.g., mild ptosis,  lid retraction, globe dystopia)
 +
| colspan="2" |1.  Detect or verify  most subtle abnormalities;  confirm presence or absence  of pertinent disease-specific findings  (e.g., floppy lid, subtle retropulsion resistance)
 +
| colspan="2" |1.  Develop advanced techniques  for assessing external exam findings  in unusual circumstances
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
| colspan="7" |                                                                                                                  
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="14" |Comments:             
+
| colspan="7" |Comments:             
 
|-
 
|-
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 1,696: Line 2,148:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD), oral/written examination
+
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="14" |'''PC-5 Nonsurgical Therapy'''  
+
| colspan="5" |'''PC-2C Ocular Motility/Orthoptic Evaluation'''
  
'''COECSA BCS7, PM1, PM2, PM3, PM6, PS10'''
+
'''COECSA CA5, PI1, PS12'''
 
|-
 
|-
|'''Has not'''
+
|'''Level  1'''
 +
|'''Level 2'''
 +
|'''Level  3'''
 +
|'''Level 4'''
 +
|'''Level  5'''
 +
|-
 +
|1.  Describe components of ocular motility  exam; test versions  and ductions
 +
|1.  Accurately test and record ductions, versions, saccadic  and pursuit movements; detect obvious ocular  misalignment; identify  nystagmus
 +
|1.  Accurately measure alignment with prisms; detect less obvious  misalignment; distinguish phoria  and tropia, perform forced ductions
 +
|1.  Detect or verify  subtle motility  abnormalities; classify common nystagmus patterns
 +
|1.  Recognize and classify complex eye movement abnormalities at  subspecialty level
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="5" |                                                                                                            
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="5" |Comments:           
 +
|}
 +
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
  
'''Achieved'''
+
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="5" |'''PC-2D Pupils'''
  
'''pre-residency'''
+
'''COECSA CA4'''
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
+
|-
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
+
|'''Level 1'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
+
|'''Level 2'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
+
|'''Level 3'''
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
+
|'''Level 4'''
 +
|'''Level 5'''
 +
|-
 +
|1. Describe components of pupil testing, including test for relative  afferent pupillary defect  (RAPD)
 +
|1. Accurately  grade pupil size and  reactivity; detect  obvious asymmetry and RAPD
 +
|1. Detect less obvious abnormalities (e.g., mild RAPD,  efferent defect, sympathetic denervation); perform and  interpret pharmacologic testing
 +
|1. Detect or verify subtle abnormalities (e.g.,  light-near dissociation); search  for associated neurologic findings;  (e.g., lid or motility abnormalities)
 +
|1. Recognize  and classify pupillary  abnormalities at subspecialty level
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="5" |                                                                                                                                                          
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
| colspan="5" |Comments:           
| colspan="2" |1.  Describes basic concepts of ophthalmic  pharmacotherapy, e.g. most common topical diagnostic and therapeutic agents
+
|}
 +
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
  
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="5" |'''PC-2E Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy'''
  
2.  Ability to manage medical emergencies (e.g. allergic reactioncardio-respiratory failure, LOC),
+
'''COECSA CA7'''
| colspan="3" |1.  Describes categories of medications (e.g. lubricant, antibioticanti-inflammatory, anesthetic); describes basic pharmacology of drug therapy and broad indications/contraindications for medical therapy of common ophthalmic conditions; describes routes of drug administration (e.g. topicaloral, periocular, and intravenous) and dosing regimens
+
|-
 
+
|'''Level  1'''
 
+
|'''Level 2'''
 
+
|'''Level  3'''
 
+
|'''Level 4'''
 
+
|'''Level  5'''
 
+
|-
 
+
|1.  Describe components of slit lamp exam; identify corneal abrasion
| colspan="3" |1.  Initiates therapy with medication for  common ophthalmic diseases; monitor for adverse drug reactions and  interactions
+
|1.  Identify anterior segment  structures; recognize common  corneal and conjunctival  abnormalities, iritis
 +
|1Recognize less obvious  abnormalities (e.g.,  corneal edema, endothelial loss, dysplasia)
 +
|1. Detect or verify subtle abnormalities (e.g.,  corneal thinning); search for associated findings (e.g., orbital signs)
 +
|1. Recognize and classify anterior segment abnormalities at  subspecialty level
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="5" |                                                                                                                    
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="5" |Comments:           
 +
|}
 +
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
  
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="5" |'''PC-2F Gonioscopy'''
 +
|-
 +
|'''Level  1'''
 +
|'''Level 2'''
 +
|'''Level  3'''
 +
|'''Level 4'''
 +
|'''Level  5'''
 +
|-
 +
|1.  Describe purpose of gonioscopy
 +
|1.  Describe principles and indications, and properly perform basic  techniques of gonioscopy
  
2.  Describes indications for oral and intravenous  therapy; recognize possible racial, gender, and genomic differences in  outcomes of medical therapy
 
  
 +
2.  Recognize normal angle  structure; identify angle closure
 +
|1.  Grade more questionable angles  using compression and lens tilting; identify more subtle features  (e.g., neovascularization, recession,  synechiae)
 +
|1.  Perform in technically difficult examinations; detect or verify  subtle abnormalities (e.g.,  pigmentation, plateau iris)
 +
|1.  Recognize and classify gonioscopic abnormalities at subspecialty level
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="5" |                                                                                                              
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="5" |Comments:           
 +
|}
 +
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
  
3.  Demonstrates ability to use electronic  prescribing (where available); demonstrate competence in periocular  injections
+
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="5" |'''PC-2G Tonometry'''
  
 +
'''COECSA CA6'''
 +
|-
 +
|'''Level 1'''
 +
|'''Level 2'''
 +
|'''Level 3'''
 +
|'''Level 4'''
 +
|'''Level 5'''
 +
|-
 +
|1. Describe applanation technique of measuring intraocular pressure
 +
|1. Accurately measure intraocular  pressure in routine patients using applanation
 +
|
 +
|1. Combine or modify  techniques in patients with abnormal corneas or limited cooperation  (e.g., Tono-Pen, average Goldmann  readings 90 degrees  apart)
 +
|1. Develop  advanced techniques for measuring intraocular pressure in unusual circumstances
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="5" |                                                                                                              
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="5" |Comments:           
 +
|}
 +
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="5" |'''PC-2H  Ophthalmoscopy (Direct and Indirect)'''
  
4.  Ability to use bandage contact lenses appropriately.
+
'''COECSA CA8'''
| colspan="3" |1.  Manages and individualizes medical therapy  for more complex ophthalmic conditions
+
|-
 
+
|'''Level 1'''
 
+
|'''Level 2'''
2.  Recognizes indications for alternative  therapies, including surgical intervention; integrate  environmental/behavioral factors
+
|'''Level 3'''
 
+
|'''Level 4'''
 
+
|'''Level 5'''
3.  Manages complications
+
|-
 
+
|1.  Identify optic nerve using direct ophthalmoscopy
 
 
4.  Considers non-medical factors such as cost,  convenience, ability to receive medication
 
 
 
 
 
5.  Demonstrates competence in intravitreal  injections
 
| colspan="2" |1.   Adopts new therapies based on CME and literature review. Identifies gaps in care and process for improvement
 
 
 
  
  
 +
2.  Estimate  optic nerve cup-disc ratio
 +
|1.  Perform slit  lamp indirect ophthalmoscopy
  
  
 +
2.  Recognize  normal optic nerve and retinal appearance; detect obvious abnormalities  (e.g., optic atrophy, papilledema, retinal detachment)
 +
|1.  Perform slit  lamp ophthalmoscopy with the Hruby, +78, +90 lenses, 3- mirror contact lens,  and trans-equator (pan- funduscopic) contact lens
  
 +
2.  Detect less  obvious abnormalities (e.g., early glaucomatous excavation, macular  degeneration, large retinal tear)
  
 +
3.  Perform  indirect ophthalmoscopy and peripheral retinal examination
 +
|1. Detect or verify  subtle abnormalities and unusual presentations (e.g., mild maculopathy,  shallow detachment, subtle tear); perform scleral depression
 +
|1. Recognize and  classify complex optic disc and retino-vitreous abnormalities at subspecialty  level
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="5" |                                                                                                                  
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="5" |Comments:            
 +
|}
 +
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
  
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="14" |'''PC-3 Diagnostic Procedures &  Instruments'''
  
 +
COECSA BCS10, PI7
 +
|-
 +
|'''Has not'''
  
 +
'''Achieved'''
  
 +
'''Level 1'''
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
| colspan="2" |1.  Describes role of office   diagnostic procedures in diagnosis of  ophthalmic disease
  
  
  
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Selects and/or performs appropriate  routine diagnostic tests and imaging procedures based on patient’s ocular complaints  and medical condition
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Interprets routine findings.  Recognize indications for advanced  diagnostic tests and imaging procedures
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Interprets  unusual findings, identify artifacts. Employ routine and advanced diagnostic  tests and imaging procedures according to evidence based medicine
 +
| colspan="2" |1.  Selects diagnostic  procedures in a cost-effective manner
  
  
Line 1,796: Line 2,353:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
'''           Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD), oral/written examination/DOPS
+
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
 
 
  
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="14" |'''PC-6 Minor Surgery'''  
+
| colspan="13" |'''PC-3A Perimetry'''
  
'''COECSA PM1, PM2, PM4, PM5'''
+
'''COECSA PI10'''
 
|-
 
|-
|'''Has not'''
 
 
'''Achieved'''
 
 
'''pre-residency'''
 
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level  1'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level  1'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
Line 1,815: Line 2,366:
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level  5'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level  5'''
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
| colspan="2" |1.  Describe role of perimetric tests to quantify and categorize visual loss in damage of the visual pathway
| colspan="2" |1.  Describes essential components of care related to non-OR surgery, e.g., informed consent, indications and contraindications for surgery, pertinent anatomy, anaesthetic and operative technique, potential intra- and postoperative complications
+
| colspan="3" |1.  Describe fundamentals of perimetry, including kinetic and static techniques; interpret perimetry in routine optic nerve and central nervous system (CNS) disorders
| colspan="3" |For each procedure:
+
| colspan="3" |1. Interpret perimetry in more  complex optic nerve  disorders, including glaucoma, and CNS disorders, including homonymous and bitemporal defects
 
+
| colspan="3" |1.  Interpret complex perimetric results, including change over time,  using statistical algorithms; identify artifacts
1.  Lists indications and describe relevant anatomy and pathophysiology of disorder
+
| colspan="2" |1.  Recognize and classify complex perimetric abnormalities at  subspecialty level
 
 
2.  Identifies findings that are indicators for the procedure and potential postop complications
 
 
 
3.  Describes anaesthetic  & surgical technique, mechanism of effect, and specific instruments required
 
 
 
4.  Performs directed pre-op assessment; administers  anesthesia and  performs procedure with direct supervision; provides appropriate post-op  care
 
| colspan="3" |1.   Administers anaesthesia and perform procedure with indirect supervision
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2.  Recognizes intra- and  postoperative complications
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
| colspan="3" |1.  Administers anaesthesia and performs procedure with oversight supervision
 
 
 
 
 
2. Manages intra- and  postoperative complications
 
 
 
 
 
3. Ability to interpret and act on results
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
| colspan="2" |1.  Attains individual outcome & process measures within 2 standard deviations of benchmark means
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |    
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
Line 1,880: Line 2,379:
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |
+
| colspan="2" |         
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="14" |Comments:             
+
| colspan="13" |Comments:             
 
|-
 
|-
|
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 1,902: Line 2,398:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
'''Assessment Tools''': DOPS, OSAT
+
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
 
 
  
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="14" |'''PC-6A Laser Procedures'''
+
| colspan="14" |'''PC-3B Corneal Pachymetry and Topography'''
  
'''COECSA SS13, SS14, SS15'''
+
'''COECSA PI2'''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
+
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
| colspan="4" |'''Level 4'''
+
| colspan="4" |'''Level 4'''
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''  
+
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |1. Describe uses of laser in ophthalmology
+
| colspan="2" |1. Describe purpose of corneal  pachymetry and topography
| colspan="3" |1.  Identify mode of tissue interaction, therapeutic effect, side effects, complications, safety issues
+
| colspan="3" |1. Describe indications for pachymetry and tomography; interpret basic abnormalities (e.g., irregular astigmatism, corneal thinning)
 
+
| colspan="3" |1. Perform and interpret corneal topographic and pachymetric measurements, and apply these to refraction, contact lens fitting, glaucoma management
2.  Describe appropriate laser settings
+
| colspan="4" |1. Perform and interpret advanced  corneal topographic and  pachymetric measurements, and apply these to refractive surgery
 
+
| colspan="2" |1. Recognize and classify complex pachymetry and topography abnormalities at subspecialty level
3.  Use equipment  effectively with correct contact lens, including peripheral retina, lens  capsule
 
| colspan="3" |1. Perform  glaucoma (e.g., iridotomy, trabeculoplasty) and retina (e.g., panretinal photocoagulationlaser retinopexy for  isolated retinal breaks) procedures, Yag capsulotomy
 
| colspan="4" |1. Perform more complicated retinal procedures (e.g., diabetic focal/grid macula, repeat panretinal photocoagulation laser retinopexy of large or multiple breaks)
 
| colspan="2" |1. Perform  laser procedures at subspecialty level
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
Line 1,937: Line 2,428:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="14" |Comments:             
+
| colspan="14" |Comments:             
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
Line 1,954: Line 2,445:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
'''Assessment Tools''': DOPS, OSAT
+
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
  
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="14" |'''PC-6B Nasolacrimal Probing and Irrigation'''
+
| colspan="14" |'''PC-3C Ultrasonography & Biometry'''
  
'''COECSA PS6'''
+
'''COECSA PI3,  PI9, PS13'''
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
| colspan="4" |'''Level 4'''
+
| colspan="4" |'''Level 4'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |1. Describe purpose of nasolacrimal probing and irrigation
+
| colspan="2" |1. Describe role of ultrasonography for diagnosis when ocular media  not clear
| colspan="3" |1.  Perform basic lacrimal assessment (e.g., dye testingpunctal dilation, canalicular  probing)
+
| colspan="3" |1. Describe principles of, indications forand techniques of ocular A- and B-scan ultrasonography
| colspan="3" |1. Perform basic lacrimal procedures (e.g.,  lacrimal drainage testing, irrigation, dye disappearance test) and lacrimal intubation
+
| colspan="3" |1. Perform A- and B-scan and interpret basic findings (e.g.,  retinal and choroidal detachmentaxial length)
| colspan="4" |1. Perform advanced lacrimal assessment (e.g., intra-  and post-operative testing, canalicular  probing in trauma)
+
| colspan="4" |1. Utilize  A-scan data to calculate  intraocular lens (IOL) power;  interpret complex  A- and B-scan ultrasonography  (e.g., choroidal melanoma)
| colspan="2" |1.  Perform nasolacrimal probing and irrigation in unusual circumstances at subspecialty level
+
| colspan="2" |1. Recognize and classify complex ultrasonographic abnormalities at subspecialty level
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
Line 1,984: Line 2,475:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="14" |Comments:             
+
| colspan="14" |Comments:             
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
Line 2,001: Line 2,492:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
'''Assessment Tools''': DOPS, OSAT
+
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
 +
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="13" |'''PC-6C'''  
+
| colspan="14" |'''PC-3D Optic Coherence Tomography (OCT)/Confocal Laser Tomography  (CLT)'''
  
'''Chalazion Excision, Excision/Biopsy Lid/Conjunctiva  Lesion Tarsal plate rotation'''
+
'''COECSA PI5'''
 
+
|-
'''Corneal scrape'''
 
 
 
'''COECSA SS10'''
 
|-
 
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
+
| colspan="4" |'''Level 4'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |1. Demonstrates  PC-6 Level 1 milestones for the procedures above with  direct supervision
+
| colspan="2" |1. Describe purpose of OCT and CLT
| colspan="3" |1. Demonstrates PC-6 Level 2 milestones for the procedures above with direct supervision
+
| colspan="3" |1. Describe principles of, indications for, and techniques of OCT and  CLT in analyzing retina and optic disc
| colspan="3" |1. Demonstrates PC-6 Level 3 milestones for the procedures above with indirect supervision
+
| colspan="3" |1. Interpret basic OCT and CLT findings (e.g., nerve fiber layer thinning, macular edema, optic disc excavation)
| colspan="3" |1. Demonstrates PC-6 Level 4 milestones for the procedures above with oversight supervision
+
| colspan="4" |1. Interpret complex findings (e.g., epiretinal membranes); identify artifacts
| colspan="2" |1. Demonstrates PC-6 Level 5 milestones for the procedures above with oversight supervision
+
| colspan="2" |1. Recognize and classify complex OCT and CLT abnormalities at subspecialty level
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
Line 2,028: Line 2,516:
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
|
+
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 2,034: Line 2,522:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="13" |Comments:             
+
| colspan="14" |Comments:             
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 2,050: Line 2,539:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
'''Assessment Tools''': DOPS, OSAT
+
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
  
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="14" |'''PC-7 OT Surgery'''  
+
| colspan="14" |'''PC-3E Fluorescein Angiography'''
  
'''COECSA PM4, PM5, PS3, PS4, SS1, SS2, SS3, COM5, COM6, COM13'''
+
'''COECSA PI4'''
 
|-
 
|-
|'''Has not'''
 
 
'''Achieved'''
 
 
'''pre-residency'''
 
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
+
| colspan="4" |'''Level 4'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
|-
 
|-
 +
| colspan="2" |1. Describe role of fluorescein angiography in diagnosis of retinal and optic nerve  disease
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Describe principles of, indications for, and techniques of fluorescein angiography  in analyzing the retina and  optic disc (e.g., phases  of the angiogram)
 +
 +
2.  Interpret basic fluorescein angiography  in common retinal disorders (e.g., diabetic retinopathy, cystoid macular edema)
 +
| colspan="3" |1. Interpret  fluorescein angiography in  less common retinal diseases
 +
| colspan="4" |1. Interpret  fluorescein angiography in complex  retinal vascular and other diseases (e.g., occult  and recurrent choroidal neovascular membranes)
 +
| colspan="2" |1. Recognize  and classify complex  fluorescein angiographic abnormalities at subspecialty level
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 +
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 +
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 +
|
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |1.  Describes essential components of care related to OR surgery, e.g.,  informed consent, indications and contraindications for surgery, pertinent  anatomy, anesthetic and operative technique, potential intra- and postoperative  complications
+
| colspan="2" |
| colspan="3" |For each  procedure:
 
 
 
1. Lists indications for, procedure selection, describe relevant  anatomy, instrumentation for procedures, including calibration and operation  of the microscope, and necessary postoperative care
 
 
 
 
 
2. Identifies common intra-operative  and post-operative complications and perform postoperative care managing  common complications
 
 
 
 
 
3. Prepares and drapes for  extraocular & intraocular procedures (good aseptic technique)
 
 
 
 
 
4. Describes methods for regional  and general anesthesia
 
 
 
 
 
5. Performs portions of selected  procedures
 
 
 
6. Wet lab participation
 
| colspan="3" |1.  Obtains informed consent and perform selected procedures
 
 
 
 
 
2.  Identifies and manages less common intraoperative and postoperative  complications
 
 
 
 
 
3. completion of surgical wet lab  curriculum, simulation if available, and assisting rotation
 
 
 
 
 
4. Prepares theater list considering  patient needs (oversees all pre-operative planning)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
| colspan="3" |1. Obtains informed consent and  perform selected procedures
 
 
 
 
 
2. Identifies and manages uncommon  intraoperative and postoperative complications
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
| colspan="2" |1. Attains individual outcome &  process measures within 2 standard deviations of benchmark means
 
 
 
 
 
2. Uses results of MOC to develop  individual PI plan
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
|-
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
Line 2,167: Line 2,588:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
'''Assessment Tools''': DOPS, OSATS, OSCARs, video review with rubric,  
+
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
  
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="14" |'''PC-7A''' '''Cataract Surgery'''
+
| colspan="14" |'''PC-3F  Neuroimaging (CT and MRI)'''
  
'''COECSA SS4'''
+
'''COECSA PI6'''
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
Line 2,180: Line 2,601:
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |1. Describe indications and  technique of cataract surgery
+
| colspan="2" |1. Describe basic principles of CT and  magnetic resonance (MR) imaging
| colspan="3" |1. Perform selected portions of cataract surgery, including wound construction and microsurgical suturing
+
| colspan="3" |1. Describe indications for neuroimaging in ophthalmology; identify major MR sequences (e.g., T1, T2, FLAIR, fat suppression)
 
+
| colspan="3" |1. Recognize normal anatomy of orbits and parasellar regions
 
+
| colspan="4" |1. Identify major abnormalities (e.g.orbital and parasellar tumor, stroke, multiple sclerosis [MS] lesions)
| colspan="3" |1.   Perform informed consent for cataract surgery
+
| colspan="2" |1. Recognize and classify complex CT & MRI abnormalities at subspecialty level
 
 
2.  Describe MSICS/ phacoemulsification instruments and  settings and how they facilitate  the procedure
 
 
 
3.  Describe categories of IOLs, advantages, and disadvantages
 
 
 
4.  Perform cataract surgery
 
 
 
5.  Perform post-operative care of cataract surgery patients,  identify post-operative complications
 
| colspan="4" |1.   Perform cataract surgery proficiently, including complex technical aspects
 
 
 
 
 
2.  Describe indications and insertion techniques for premium IOLs to correct  astigmatism and provide  near correction
 
 
 
Manage post-operative complications  
 
| colspan="2" |1. Perform cataract surgery at subspecialty level
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
Line 2,212: Line 2,618:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="14" |Comments:     
+
| colspan="14" |Comments:           
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
Line 2,229: Line 2,635:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
 
+
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD), oral/written exams, DOPS
 
 
'''Assessment Tools''': DOPS, OSATS, OSCARs, video review with rubric,
 
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="14" |'''PC-7B Strabismus Surgery'''
+
| colspan="14" |'''PC-3G Ocular  Lubrication Testing'''
  
'''COECSA SS11'''
+
'''COECSA PS5'''
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
Line 2,244: Line 2,647:
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |1. Describe indications for and technique of strabismus surgery
+
| colspan="2" |1. Describe role of office testing to identify dry eyes
| colspan="3" |1.   Perform selected portions of strabismus surgery, including extraocular muscle suturing
+
| colspan="3" |1. Describe indications for and perform tests to identify dry eye syndrome and exposure keratopathy (e.g., assessment of tear film breakup time, corneal stain with fluorescein and rose bengal  dyes, Schirmer test)
 
+
| colspan="3" |
 
+
| colspan="4" |1. Perform diagnostic temporary punctal occlusion
2.   Perform post-operative care of  strabismus surgery patients
+
| colspan="2" |1. Develop advanced techniques for quantifying ocular lubrication in unusual circumstances
| colspan="3" |1.  Obtains informed consent for strabismus surgery
 
 
 
2.  Perform horizontal strabismus surgery recession and resection
 
 
 
3.  Manage intra-  and post- operative complications of strabismus surgery
 
| colspan="4" |1.   Perform vertical and oblique muscle strabismus surgery
 
 
 
 
 
2.  Describe surgical considerations for re- operations in strabismus surgery
 
| colspan="2" |1. Perform strabismus surgery at subspecialty  level
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
Line 2,288: Line 2,681:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
 +
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD), oral/written exams, DOPS
  
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="14" |'''PC-4  Disease Diagnosis'''
  
'''Assessment Tools''': DOPS, OSATS, OSCARs, video review with rubric,
+
'''COECSA  BCS6, CA12, PM9, PM10'''
 +
|-
 +
|'''Has not'''
  
{| class="wikitable"
+
'''Achieved'''
| colspan="14" |'''PC-7C Cornea'''
 
  
'''COECSA PS7,  PS8, PS9, PS11'''
+
'''pre-residency'''
|-
 
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
| colspan="4" |'''Level 4'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |1. Describe indications for and technique of cornea surgery
+
|
| colspan="3" |1.  Describe concepts of corneal astigmatism/ refractive errorstromal scarring, and endothelial function, and their surgical management
+
| colspan="2" |1.   Describes basic clinical features of common ophthalmologic disorders,  e.g. red eye, glaucoma, cataract, diabetic retinopathy
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Recalls  and presents clinical facts of the history and basic eye exam without higher level of synthesis and generates at least one item of the differential diagnosis for common ophthalmologic disorders
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Abstracts  and reorganizes elicited clinical findings 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
2Prioritizes potential causes of patient complaint; compares and  contrasts diagnoses under consideration, considers manifestations of systemic diseases
 +
 
 +
 
 +
3.  Generates more focused differential diagnosis and organized final  assessment
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Organizes clinical facts in a hierarchical level of importance.   Identify discriminating features between  similar patients
 +
 
 +
Incorporates most current literature findings in formulation of differential diagnosis
 +
 
 +
2.  Generates focused differential and evaluation strategy to finalize  diagnosis
 +
 
 +
3.  Verifies diagnostic assessments of junior members of healthcare team
 +
| colspan="2" |1 Continues to incorporate most current  literature findings in formulation of differential diagnosis
 +
 
  
  
2.  Perform corneal foreign  body removal at slit lamp
 
| colspan="3" |1.  Obtains informed  consent for common corneal surgeries
 
  
2.  Perform suture removal  and corneal scrape at slit lamp
 
  
3.  Describe techniques of corneal  patch grafting, gluing, chelation of band keratopathy, conjunctival flaps,  and amniotic membrane grafting
 
  
4.  Perform suturing of corneal wounds  (traumatic or surgical)
 
  
5.  Perform pterygium surgery
 
| colspan="4" |1.  Perform limbal relaxing incisions or arcuate keratotomy  as part of cataract surgery
 
  
  
2.  Perform post-operative care for  common keratorefractive surgeries
 
  
3.  Recognize and  initiate management of common  post-operative complications  (e.g., graft rejection)
 
| colspan="2" |1. Perform  cornea surgery at subspecialty level
 
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
Line 2,331: Line 2,741:
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
|
 
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
Line 2,353: Line 2,762:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
'''Assessment Tools''': DOPS, OSATS, OSCARs, video review with rubric
+
'''Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD), oral/written examination
 
 
  
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="5" |'''PC-7D Glaucoma'''
+
| colspan="14" |'''PC-5 Nonsurgical Therapy'''  
  
'''COECSA SS5'''
+
'''COECSA BCS7, PM1, PM2, PM3, PM6, PS10'''
 
|-
 
|-
|'''Level 1'''
+
|'''Has not'''
|'''Level 2'''
+
 
|'''Level 3'''
+
'''Achieved'''
|'''Level 4'''
+
 
|'''Level 5'''
+
'''pre-residency'''
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
|-
 
|-
|1. Describe indications for and  technique of glaucoma surgery
+
|
|1.  Describe indications for glaucoma surgery
+
| colspan="2" |1.  Describes basic concepts of ophthalmic  pharmacotherapy, e.g. most common topical diagnostic and therapeutic agents
 +
 
  
 +
2.  Ability to manage medical emergencies (e.g. allergic reaction,  cardio-respiratory failure, LOC),
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Describes categories of medications (e.g. lubricant, antibiotic,  anti-inflammatory, anesthetic); describes basic pharmacology of drug therapy  and broad indications/contraindications for medical therapy of common  ophthalmic conditions; describes routes of drug administration (e.g. topical,  oral, periocular, and intravenous) and dosing regimens
  
2.  Describe basic steps and goals of glaucoma surgery
 
  
  
3.  Identify common post- operative findings
 
|1.  Obtains informed consent for common  glaucoma surgeries  (e.g., trabeculectomy, tube  shunt, ciliary  body ablation)
 
  
  
2.  Assist on and perform selected portions of selected procedures
 
  
  
3.  Perform post-operative evaluation, and identify post-operative complications
+
| colspan="3" |1.  Initiates therapy with medication for  common ophthalmic diseases; monitor for adverse drug reactions and interactions
|1.  Perform common glaucoma surgeries (e.g.,  trabeculectomy, tube shunt, ciliary body ablation)
 
  
  
2.  Perform post-operative care for uncomplicated glaucoma surgery  patients
+
2.  Describes indications for oral and intravenous  therapy; recognize possible racial, gender, and genomic differences in  outcomes of medical therapy
 +
 
 +
 
 +
3.  Demonstrates ability to use electronic  prescribing (where available); demonstrate competence in periocular  injections
 +
 
 +
 
 +
4.  Ability to use bandage contact lenses appropriately.
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Manages and individualizes medical therapy  for more complex ophthalmic conditions
 +
 
 +
 
 +
2.  Recognizes indications for alternative  therapies, including surgical intervention; integrate  environmental/behavioral factors
 +
 
 +
 
 +
3.  Manages complications
 +
 
 +
 
 +
4.  Considers non-medical factors such as cost,  convenience, ability to receive medication
 +
 
 +
 
 +
5.  Demonstrates competence in intravitreal  injections
 +
| colspan="2" |1.  Adopts new therapies based on CME and literature review. Identifies  gaps in care and process for improvement
 +
 
  
  
3.  Manage post-operative complications for common glaucoma surgeries
 
|1. Perform glaucoma surgery at subspecialty level
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
| colspan="10" |Comments:           
 
|}
 
'''Assessment Tools''': DOPS, OSATS, OSCARs, video review with rubric
 
  
  
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="14" |'''PC-7E Oculoplastic/Orbit'''
 
  
'''COECSA SS6, SS7,  SS8, SS9, SS12'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
 
| colspan="4" |'''Level 4'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="2" |1. Describe indications for and  technique of oculoplastic/orbit surgery
 
| colspan="3" |1.  Demonstrate basic lid and  skin suturing techniques
 
  
  
2.  Close simple wounds not involving the eyelid  margin
 
  
  
3.  Provide appropriate post-  operative care  for selected procedures
 
| colspan="3" |1.  Use  functional symptoms  and exam findings to generate a treatment plan for oculoplastic  care
 
  
2.  Assess facial and eyelid  trauma (including imaging studies) to develop a treatment plan
 
  
3.  Obtains informed consent for oculoplastic procedures
 
  
4.  Close complex wounds, including  those involving the eyelid margin and evisceration
 
| colspan="4" |1.  Demonstrate and incorporate knowledge of  facial anatomy  into treatment plan
 
  
2.  Weigh alternative treatment options and describe risks and benefits of each
 
  
3.  Perform basic oculoplastics procedures (e.g., tarsal strip, blepharoplasty, ptosis repair, closure of complex wounds, canthotomy, cantholysis, enucleation)
 
  
4.  Perform simple flaps and grafts
 
| colspan="2" |1. Perform oculoplastic/orbit surgery  at subspecialty level including exenteration
 
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
Line 2,449: Line 2,841:
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
|
 
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
Line 2,471: Line 2,862:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
 +
'''           Assessment Tools''':  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD), oral/written examination/DOPS
  
  
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="14" |'''PC-6 Minor Surgery'''
  
'''Assessment Tools''': DOPS, OSATS, OSCARs, video review with rubric,
+
'''COECSA PM1, PM2, PM4, PM5'''
 +
|-
 +
|'''Has not'''
  
{| class="wikitable"
+
'''Achieved'''
| colspan="15" |'''PC-7F Retino-vitreous'''
 
  
'''COECSA SS16'''
+
'''pre-residency'''
|-
+
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
| colspan="4" |'''Level 4'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 5'''
+
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |1. Describe indications for and technique of retinovitreous surgery
+
|
| colspan="3" |1. Describe indications for and  associated risks of intra-  vitreal injections
+
| colspan="2" |1.  Describes essential  components of care related to non-OR surgery, e.g., informed consent,  indications and contraindications for surgery, pertinent anatomy, anaesthetic  and operative technique, potential intra- and postoperative complications
| colspan="3" |1Perform intra-vitreal injections & taps
+
| colspan="3" |For each procedure:
 +
 
 +
1.  Lists indications and  describe relevant anatomy and pathophysiology of disorder
 +
 
 +
2Identifies findings that are indicators for the procedure and potential postop complications
  
2Describe indications for, and techniques and complications of pars  plana vitrectomy and sclera buckling surgery; assist on retinal surgery
+
3Describes anaesthetic & surgical technique, mechanism of effect, and specific instruments required
  
3Describe indications for, and techniques and complications of radiation therapy for ocular tumors (e.g., radioactive plaque localization, external beam radiation,  radiation retinopathy)
+
4Performs directed  pre-op assessment; administers anesthesia and  performs procedure with direct supervision; provides appropriate post-op care
| colspan="4" |1.  Obtains informed consent for vitreoretinal surgery
+
| colspan="3" |1.   Administers anaesthesia and perform procedure with indirect supervision
  
 +
 
  
2.  Perform parts of a scleral buckling  surgery and/or pars plana vitrectomy for retinal detachments
+
2.  Recognizes intra- and  postoperative complications
| colspan="3" |1. Perform retinovitreous surgery at subspecialty level
+
 
|-
+
 
|
+
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Administers anaesthesia and performs procedure with oversight supervision
 +
 
 +
 
 +
2. Manages intra- and  postoperative complications
 +
 
 +
 
 +
3. Ability to interpret and act on results
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
| colspan="2" |1.  Attains individual outcome & process  measures within 2 standard deviations of benchmark means
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
Line 2,506: Line 2,947:
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
|
 
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
|
 
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="15" |Comments:             
+
| colspan="14" |Comments:             
 
|-
 
|-
|
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 2,530: Line 2,968:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
 
+
'''Assessment Tools''': DOPS, OSAT
 
 
 
 
'''Assessment Tools''': DOPS, OSATS, OSCARs, video review with rubric,
 
  
  
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="14" |'''PC-7G Globe Trauma'''
+
| colspan="14" |'''PC-6A Laser Procedures'''
  
'''COECSA SS6'''
+
'''COECSA SS13, SS14, SS15'''
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
| colspan="4" |'''Level 4'''
+
| colspan="4" |'''Level 4'''
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
+
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''  
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |1. Describe indications for and  technique of globe  trauma surgery
+
| colspan="2" |1. Describe uses of laser in ophthalmology
| colspan="3" |1.  Describe common setting for globe trauma and injury prevention
+
| colspan="3" |1.  Identify mode of tissue interaction,  therapeutic effect, side effects, complications, safety  issues
  
2.  Describe use of protective eye shield  in potential globe rupture
+
2.  Describe appropriate laser settings
  
3.  Perform examination under anesthesia for suspected globe rupture
+
3.  Use equipment effectively with correct contact lens, including peripheral retina, lens capsule
 
+
| colspan="3" |1. Perform  glaucoma (e.g., iridotomy, trabeculoplasty) and retina (e.g., panretinal photocoagulationlaser retinopexy for  isolated retinal breaks) procedures, Yag capsulotomy
4.  Prepare patient with  suspected rupture for surgery
+
| colspan="4" |1. Perform more complicated retinal procedures (e.g., diabetic  focal/grid macula, repeat panretinal photocoagulation laser retinopexy of large or multiple breaks)
 
+
| colspan="2" |1. Perform  laser procedures at subspecialty level
4.  Describe surgical steps  to identify globe rupture
 
 
 
5.  Describe techniques and  sutures for repair of ruptured globe
 
| colspan="3" |1.  Obtains informed consent for ruptured globe repair
 
 
 
 
 
2.  Perform  closure of corneal or scleral wounds
 
 
 
 
 
3.  Manage ruptured globes post-operativelyincluding complications
 
| colspan="4" |1. Perform repair of complicated corneal and scleral wounds
 
| colspan="2" |1. Perform globe trauma surgery at subspecialty level
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
Line 2,580: Line 3,003:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="14" |Comments:             
+
| colspan="14" |Comments:             
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
Line 2,596: Line 3,019:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|}  
+
|}
 
+
'''Assessment Tools''': DOPS, OSAT
'''Assessment Tools''': DOPS, OSATS, OSCARs, video review with rubric,
 
  
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="14" |'''PC-8 Consultation'''  
+
| colspan="14" |'''PC-6B Nasolacrimal Probing  and Irrigation'''
  
'''COECSA BP6, BP7, BP16, BP27, ML3'''
+
'''COECSA PS6'''
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level  2'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
 +
| colspan="4" |'''Level  4'''
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
|-
 
|-
|'''Level  1'''
+
| colspan="2" |1. Describe purpose of nasolacrimal probing and irrigation
| colspan="2" |'''Level 2'''
+
| colspan="3" |1.  Perform basic lacrimal assessment (e.g., dye testing,  punctal dilation, canalicular probing)
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
+
| colspan="3" |1. Perform  basic lacrimal procedures (e.g.,  lacrimal drainage testing, irrigation, dye  disappearance test)  and lacrimal intubation
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
+
| colspan="4" |1. Perform advanced lacrimal assessment (e.g., intra- and post-operative testing, canalicular  probing in trauma)
| colspan="3" |'''Level 5'''
+
| colspan="2" |1.  Perform nasolacrimal probing and irrigation in unusual circumstances at subspecialty  level
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |1.   Describes  the role of ophthalmology consultation in systemic disease
+
| colspan="2" |
| colspan="3" |1.  Provides specific, responsive  ophthalmologic consultation to other medical specialties
+
|
 
+
| colspan="2" |
 
+
|
2.  Recognizes urgent versus non-urgent  ophthalmic consultation and seeks help when needed.
+
| colspan="2" |
 
 
 
 
3.  Examines inpatient at bedside, including visual acuity and field, portable  slit lamp exam (+  fluorescein stain),  IOP measurement, ophthalmoscopy
 
 
 
 
 
4.  Communicates findings (written and oral) to  consulting service
 
| colspan="3" |1.  Recognizes ophthalmic emergencies and immediate, necessary  interventions
 
 
 
 
 
2.  Provides appropriate differential diagnosis  and initiate nonsurgical treatment plan
 
 
 
 
 
3.  Orders ancillary testing; request  ophthalmic subspecialty involvement when indicated
 
 
 
 
 
4.  Maintains continuing communication with  other  involved medical specialists
 
| colspan="3" |1.  Identifies consultations requiring surgical  intervention, including procedural options and timing
 
 
 
 
 
2.  Interprets ancillary tests, formulate and  initiate treatment plan independently
 
 
 
 
 
3.  Coordinates treatment plan with multiple specialties
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
| colspan="2" |1.  Provides ophthalmic subspecialty  consultation when indicated
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
|-
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |
 
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="14" |Comments:             
+
| colspan="14" |Comments:             
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
Line 2,686: Line 3,067:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
'''Assessment Tools''': Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD), oral/written exams
+
'''Assessment Tools''': DOPS, OSAT
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="14" |'''PC-9  Community Eye Health: Screening, Eye Injuries, Immunizations, Health  Promotion'''
+
| colspan="13" |'''PC-6C'''  
  
'''COECSA CEH1, CEH2, CEH5, CEH6'''
+
'''Chalazion Excision, Excision/Biopsy Lid/Conjunctiva  Lesion Tarsal plate rotation'''
|-
 
|'''Has not'''
 
  
'''Achieved'''
+
'''Corneal scrape'''
  
'''pre-residency'''
+
'''COECSA SS10'''
 +
|-
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
| colspan="2" |1. Demonstrates  PC-6 Level 1 milestones for the procedures above with direct supervision
| colspan="2" |1 understand general principles of screening and immunization
+
| colspan="3" |1. Demonstrates PC-6 Level 2 milestones for the procedures above with direct supervision
| colspan="3" |1. understand basic principles of the public health aspect of eye care. 
+
| colspan="3" |1. Demonstrates PC-6 Level 3 milestones for the procedures above with indirect supervision
 
+
| colspan="3" |1. Demonstrates  PC-6 Level 4 milestones for the procedures above with oversight supervision
 
+
| colspan="2" |1. Demonstrates PC-6 Level 5 milestones for the procedures above with oversight supervision
2. describe local eye-care screening and management programs
 
 
 
 
 
3. understand global initiatives  that effect eye care (e.g. Vision 2020).
 
| colspan="3" |1. participate in community screening and refer when appropriate
 
 
 
 
 
2 educate community about relevant diseases including eye injuries, immunizations and vitamin deficiencies
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
| colspan="3" |1. Apply basic principles of the  public health aspect of eye care. 
 
 
 
 
 
2. Understand how to assess burden  of eye disease and define context specific strategies for control
 
| colspan="2" |1. organize/conduct new screening programs and surveys
 
 
 
 
 
2. advocate for occupational eye  safety plans
 
 
 
 
 
3 develop eye-care health promotion action plan
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |
 
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |
+
|
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="14" |Comments:             
+
| colspan="13" |Comments:             
 
|-
 
|-
|
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 2,760: Line 3,116:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
'''Assessment tools:''' written or oral tests, faculty evaluation 
+
'''Assessment Tools''': DOPS, OSAT
 
 
'''MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE'''
 
  
Residents must demonstrate knowledge of established and evolving basic science, clinical, epidemiological and social-behavioral sciences, as well as the application of this knowledge to patient care. Residents must demonstrate level-appropriate knowledge in the following core domains: anatomy, physiology, biochemistry, molecular and cell biology, genetics, General Medicine; Fundamentals & Principles of Ophthalmology; Optics & Refraction; Ophthalmic Pathology & Intraocular Tumors; Neuro-Ophthalmology; Paediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus; Orbit, Eyelids, & Lacrimal System; Cornea, External Disease, & Anterior Segment Trauma; Lens & Cataract; Refractive Management & Intervention; Intraocular Inflammation & Uveitis; Glaucoma; Retina/Vitreous
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="14" |'''MK-1 Demonstrate level-appropriate knowledge'''  
+
| colspan="14" |'''PC-7 OT Surgery'''  
  
'''COECSA BCS 1-5'''
+
'''COECSA PM4, PM5, PS3, PS4, SS1, SS2, SS3, COM5, COM6, COM13'''
 
|-
 
|-
 
|'''Has not'''
 
|'''Has not'''
Line 2,775: Line 3,128:
  
 
'''pre-residency'''
 
'''pre-residency'''
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
+
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
+
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |1.  Has successfully completed internship after basic medical degree graduation
+
| colspan="2" |1.   Describes essential components of care related to OR surgery, e.g.,  informed consent, indications and contraindications for surgery, pertinent  anatomy, anesthetic and operative technique, potential intra- and postoperative complications
| colspan="3" |1.   successfully passes exams of medical knowledge as required to progress through program
+
| colspan="3" |For each  procedure:
| colspan="3" |1. successfully passes exams of  medical knowledge as required to progress through program
+
 
| colspan="3" |1. successfully passes exams of medical knowledge as required to progress through program  
+
1. Lists indications for, procedure selection, describe relevant  anatomy, instrumentation for procedures, including calibration and operation  of the microscope, and necessary postoperative care
| colspan="2" |1.   Achieves COECSA Fellowship certification.  
+
 
 +
 
 +
2. Identifies common intra-operative  and post-operative complications and perform postoperative care managing  common complications
 +
 
 +
 
 +
3. Prepares and drapes for  extraocular & intraocular procedures (good aseptic technique)
 +
 
 +
 
 +
4. Describes methods for regional  and general anesthesia
 +
 
 +
 
 +
5. Performs portions of selected procedures
 +
 
 +
6. Wet lab participation
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Obtains informed consent and perform selected procedures
 +
 
 +
 
 +
2.  Identifies and manages less common intraoperative and postoperative  complications
 +
 
 +
 
 +
3. completion of surgical wet lab curriculum, simulation if available, and assisting rotation
 +
 
 +
 
 +
4. Prepares theater list considering  patient needs (oversees all pre-operative planning)
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
| colspan="3" |1. Obtains informed consent and  perform selected procedures
 +
 
 +
 
 +
2. Identifies and manages uncommon intraoperative and postoperative complications
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
| colspan="2" |1. Attains individual outcome &  process measures within 2 standard deviations of benchmark means
 +
 
 +
 
 +
2. Uses results of MOC to develop  individual PI plan
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
Line 2,816: Line 3,233:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
'''Assessment Tools''':  Viva, written exams (semester/annual), ICO Exams, COECSA Fellowship exam
+
'''Assessment Tools''': DOPS, OSATS, OSCARs, video review with rubric,  
 
 
  
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="14" |'''MK-2 Demonstrate level-appropriate  knowledge applied to patient management'''  
+
| colspan="14" |'''PC-7A''' '''Cataract Surgery'''
  
'''COECSA BCS8, BCS12'''
+
'''COECSA SS4'''
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
 +
| colspan="4" |'''Level 4'''
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
|-
 
|-
|'''Has not'''
+
| colspan="2" |1. Describe indications and  technique of cataract surgery
 +
| colspan="3" |1. Perform  selected portions of cataract surgery, including  wound construction and microsurgical suturing
 +
 
 +
 
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Perform informed consent for cataract surgery
 +
 
 +
2.  Describe MSICS/ phacoemulsification instruments and  settings and how they facilitate  the procedure
 +
 
 +
3.  Describe categories of IOLs,  advantages, and disadvantages
 +
 
 +
4.  Perform cataract surgery
 +
 
 +
5.  Perform post-operative care of cataract surgery patients,  identify post-operative complications
 +
| colspan="4" |1.  Perform cataract surgery proficiently, including complex technical aspects
 +
 
  
'''Achieved'''
+
2.  Describe indications and insertion techniques for premium  IOLs to correct  astigmatism and provide  near correction
  
'''pre-residency'''
+
Manage post-operative complications  
| colspan="2" |'''Level  1'''
+
| colspan="2" |1. Perform cataract surgery at subspecialty level
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level  3'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level  5'''
 
|-
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |1.   Demonstrates level-appropriate knowledge for patient management on ophthalmology rotation
 
| colspan="3" |1.    Demonstrates level-appropriate knowledge for patient management for  level
 
| colspan="3" |1.    Demonstrates level-appropriate knowledge for patient management for  level
 
| colspan="3" |1.  Demonstrates  level-appropriate knowledge for patient management on for level
 
| colspan="2" |1.  Participates in CPD according to country requirements
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
Line 2,848: Line 3,274:
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |
 
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="14" |Comments:             
+
| colspan="14" |Comments:       
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
Line 2,870: Line 3,295:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
'''Assessment Tools:'''  Observed patient encounter (OCEX CCRS), Viva preferred over written, Case-Based Discussion evaluation 
 
  
  
 +
'''Assessment Tools''': DOPS, OSATS, OSCARs, video review with rubric,
  
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="14" |'''MK-3  Equipment Maintenance'''
+
| colspan="14" |'''PC-7B Strabismus Surgery'''
  
'''COECSA CEH4'''  
+
'''COECSA SS11'''
 
|-
 
|-
|'''Has not'''
 
 
'''Achieved'''
 
 
'''pre-residency'''
 
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
+
| colspan="4" |'''Level 4'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
| colspan="2" |1. Describe indications  for and technique of strabismus surgery
| colspan="2" |
+
| colspan="3" |1.  Perform selected portions of strabismus surgery, including  extraocular muscle  suturing
  
  
Appreciate cost and delicate nature of ophthalmic equipment
+
2.  Perform post-operative care of strabismus surgery patients
| colspan="3" |1 Able to describe parts and  function of diagnostic equipment/lenses and their basic maintenance
+
| colspan="3" |1.  Obtains informed consent for strabismus surgery
  
 +
2.  Perform horizontal strabismus surgery recession and resection
  
2.Use appropriately for their level
+
3.   Manage intra-  and post- operative complications of strabismus surgery
| colspan="3" |
+
| colspan="4" |1.  Perform vertical and oblique muscle strabismus surgery
 
 
 
 
Level appropriate use and maintenance of diagnostic equipment/lenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
| colspan="3" |1 Able to describe and teach proper  diagnostic equipment use and maintenance
 
| colspan="2" | 
 
 
 
Works within the system to obtain  most cost-efficient equipment
 
  
  
 +
2.  Describe surgical considerations for re- operations  in strabismus surgery
 +
| colspan="2" |1. Perform  strabismus surgery at subspecialty  level
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
Line 2,919: Line 3,333:
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |
 
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="14" |Comments:             
+
| colspan="14" |Comments:             
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
Line 2,941: Line 3,354:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
'''Assessment tools''': faculty evaluation, written/oral test 
 
  
'''PROFESSIONALISM'''
 
  
Residents must demonstrate a commitment to carrying out professional responsibilities and an adherence to ethical principles.  Residents are expected to demonstrate:
+
'''Assessment Tools''': DOPS, OSATS, OSCARs, video review with rubric,
 +
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="14" |'''PROF-1:  Compassion, integrity, and respect for others; sensitivity and responsiveness  to diverse patient populations'''
+
| colspan="14" |'''PC-7C Cornea'''
  
'''COECSA BP18'''
+
'''COECSA PS7,  PS8, PS9, PS11'''
 
|-
 
|-
|'''Has not'''
 
 
'''Achieved'''
 
 
'''pre-residency'''
 
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
+
| colspan="4" |'''Level 4'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
| colspan="2" |1. Describe indications  for and technique of cornea  surgery
| colspan="2" |1.  Recognizes and never participates in:
+
| colspan="3" |1.   Describe concepts of corneal astigmatism/ refractive error,  stromal scarring, and endothelial function,  and their surgical management
  
verbal or  physical abuse to patients, peers, staff, or supervisors; sexual harassment
 
  
 +
2.  Perform corneal foreign  body removal at slit lamp
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Obtains informed  consent for common corneal surgeries
  
2.  Recognizes and never participates in:
+
2.   Perform suture removal  and corneal scrape at slit lamp
  
discrimination based on gender, age, culture, race, religion, disability, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status
+
3.  Describe techniques of corneal patch grafting, gluing, chelation of band keratopathy, conjunctival flaps,  and amniotic membrane grafting
| colspan="3" |1.  Consistently demonstrates behaviour that  conveys caring, honesty, and genuine interest in patients and families
 
  
2Demonstrates compassion, integrity, respect, sensitivity, and responsiveness
+
4Perform suturing of corneal wounds (traumatic or surgical)
  
3.  Exhibits these attitudes consistently in common and uncomplicated situations
+
5.   Perform pterygium surgery
 +
| colspan="4" |1.  Perform limbal relaxing incisions or arcuate keratotomy as part of cataract surgery
  
4.  Usually recognizes cultural and  socioeconomic issues in patient care 
 
| colspan="3" |1.  Exhibits these attitudes in complex and complicated situations
 
  
 +
2.  Perform post-operative care for  common keratorefractive surgeries
  
2.  Almost always recognizes cultural and  socioeconomic issues in patient care
+
3.   Recognize and  initiate management of common  post-operative complications  (e.g., graft rejection)
 
+
| colspan="2" |1. Perform cornea surgery at subspecialty level
 
 
3. Adheres to ethical principles
 
 
 
 
 
| colspan="3" |1. Exhibits these attitudes consistently in  all relationships and situations
 
 
 
 
 
2.  Consistently recognizes cultural and  socioeconomic issues in patient care
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
| colspan="2" |1. Role models behavior  demonstrating compassion and respect for others, cultural and socioeconomic issues in patient  care
 
 
 
 
 
2. Mentors junior members of health care teams
 
 
 
 
 
3. Develops organizational policies  and education to support the application of these principles
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
Line 3,008: Line 3,398:
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |
 
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="14" |Comments:             
+
| colspan="14" |Comments:             
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
Line 3,030: Line 3,419:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
'''             Assessment Tools''': 360 degree/multisource feedback, OSCE
+
'''Assessment Tools''': DOPS, OSATS, OSCARs, video review with rubric
 
 
  
  
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="15" |'''PROF 2: Responsiveness to patient  needs that supersedes self-interest'''
+
| colspan="5" |'''PC-7D Glaucoma'''
  
'''COECSA BP18, BP24, BP30'''
+
'''COECSA SS5'''
 +
|-
 +
|'''Level 1'''
 +
|'''Level 2'''
 +
|'''Level 3'''
 +
|'''Level 4'''
 +
|'''Level 5'''
 
|-
 
|-
|'''Has not'''
+
|1. Describe indications for and  technique of glaucoma surgery
 +
|1.  Describe indications for glaucoma surgery
  
'''Achieved'''
 
  
'''pre-residency'''
+
2.  Describe basic steps and goals of glaucoma surgery
| colspan="2" |'''Level  1'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level  3'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level  5'''
 
|-
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |1.   Recognizes and never participates in:
 
  
refusal to perform assigned tasks, answer pages or calls;  avoidance of scheduled call duty
 
| colspan="3" |1.  Almost always completes patient care tasks promptly and completely;  punctual; appropriately groomed
 
  
2.  Manages  fatigue, sleep deprivation and personal health issues.
+
3.  Identify common post- operative findings
 
+
|1.  Obtains informed consent for common  glaucoma surgeries  (e.g., trabeculectomy, tube shunt, ciliary body ablation)
3.  Identifies  impact of personal beliefs and values on practice of medicine
 
| colspan="3" |1.  Consistently completes patient care tasks promptly and completely; punctual; appropriately groomed
 
  
  
2.  Manages  personal beliefs and values to avoid negative impact on patient care
+
2.  Assist on and perform selected portions of selected procedures
| colspan="3" |1.  Monitors fatigue, sleep deprivation and personal health in junior  members of health care team
 
  
  
2.   Mentors junior members of the healthcare team to manage barriers to  effective patient care 
+
3.  Perform post-operative evaluation, and identify post-operative complications
| colspan="3" |1.  Role models behavior demonstrating compassion and respect for others
+
|1.  Perform common glaucoma surgeries (e.g.,  trabeculectomy, tube shunt, ciliary body ablation)
 +
 
 +
 
 +
2.  Perform post-operative care for uncomplicated glaucoma surgery  patients
  
  
2Develops  organizational policies and education to support the application of these  principles
+
3Manage post-operative complications for common glaucoma surgeries
|-
+
|1. Perform glaucoma surgery at subspecialty level
|
+
|}
|
+
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
| colspan="15" |Comments:           
 
|-
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 3,101: Line 3,468:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="10" |Comments:           
 
|}
 
|}
'''Assessment Tools''' 360 degree/multisource feedback
+
'''Assessment Tools''': DOPS, OSATS, OSCARs, video review with rubric
 
 
  
  
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="14" |'''PROF-3: Respect for patient privacy  and autonomy'''
+
| colspan="14" |'''PC-7E Oculoplastic/Orbit'''
  
'''COECSA BP14, BP18, BP21'''
+
'''COECSA SS6, SS7, SS8, SS9, SS12'''
 
|-
 
|-
|'''Has not'''
+
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 
 
'''Achieved'''
 
 
 
'''pre-residency'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
+
| colspan="4" |'''Level 4'''
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
+
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
| colspan="2" |1. Describe indications for and  technique of oculoplastic/orbit surgery
| colspan="2" |1.   Conforms to national patient rights regulations
+
| colspan="3" |1.  Demonstrate basic lid and  skin suturing techniques
  
2.  Recognizes and never participates in:
 
  
unauthorized examination of patient records
+
2.  Close simple wounds not involving the eyelid  margin
  
disclosure of protected health information to unauthorized  personnel
 
| colspan="3" |1.  Almost always: recognizes and implements required procedures for  patient involvement in human research; inform patients of rights; involve  patients in medical decision-making
 
| colspan="3" |
 
| colspan="3" |1.  Consistently recognizes and implements required procedures for patient  involvement in human research; informs patients of rights; involves patients  in medical decision-making
 
  
2.   Mentors junior members of the healthcare team regarding protection of  patient privacy
+
3.  Provide appropriate post-  operative care  for selected procedures
| colspan="2" |1.  Role models behavior regarding protection of patient privacy
+
| colspan="3" |1.  Use  functional symptoms  and exam findings to generate a treatment plan for oculoplastic  care
 +
 
 +
2.  Assess facial and eyelid  trauma (including imaging studies) to develop a treatment plan
 +
 
 +
3.  Obtains informed consent for oculoplastic procedures
 +
 
 +
4.  Close complex wounds, including  those involving the eyelid margin and evisceration
 +
| colspan="4" |1.  Demonstrate and incorporate knowledge of  facial anatomy into treatment plan
 +
 
 +
2.  Weigh alternative treatment options and describe risks and benefits of each
  
2Mentors residents  involved in administration of research projects involving humans
+
3Perform basic oculoplastics procedures (e.g., tarsal strip, blepharoplasty, ptosis repair, closure of complex wounds, canthotomy, cantholysis, enucleation)
  
3Develops  organizational policies and education to support the application of these principles
+
4Perform simple flaps and grafts
 +
| colspan="2" |1. Perform oculoplastic/orbit surgery at subspecialty level including exenteration
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
Line 3,147: Line 3,516:
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |
 
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
Line 3,169: Line 3,537:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
'''            Assessment Tools''': 360 degree/multisource
 
  
 
 
  
  
 +
'''Assessment Tools''': DOPS, OSATS, OSCARs, video review with rubric,
  
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="14" |'''PROF-4: Accountability to patients,  society and the profession'''
+
| colspan="15" |'''PC-7F Retino-vitreous'''
  
'''COECSA BP4, BP8, BP9, BP17, BP18,  BP19, BP20, BP22, BP23'''  
+
'''COECSA SS16'''
 
|-
 
|-
|'''Has not'''
+
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 
 
'''Achieved'''
 
 
 
'''pre-residency'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
+
| colspan="4" |'''Level 4'''
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 5'''
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
| colspan="2" |1. Describe indications for and  technique of retinovitreous surgery
| colspan="2" |1.   Recognizes and never participates in:
+
| colspan="3" |1. Describe indications for and associated risks of intra-  vitreal injections
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Perform intra-vitreal injections  & taps
  
deception regarding level of training and  experience, medical errors; demeaning other practitioners
+
2.  Describe indications  for, and techniques and complications of pars  plana vitrectomy and sclera buckling surgery; assist on retinal surgery
  
 +
3.  Describe indications  for, and techniques and complications of radiation therapy  for ocular tumors  (e.g., radioactive plaque localization, external beam radiation,  radiation retinopathy)
 +
| colspan="4" |1.  Obtains informed consent  for vitreoretinal surgery
  
2.  Recognizes and never participates in:
 
  
plagiarism, falsification of records, misrepresentation of training, unexplained absences
+
2.  Perform parts of a scleral buckling surgery and/or pars plana vitrectomy for retinal detachments
 
+
| colspan="3" |1. Perform retinovitreous surgery at subspecialty level
 
+
|-
3. Adheres to national legal requirements for medical practice
+
|
 
+
| colspan="2" |
 
+
|
4. Aware of local guidelines and legislature impacting eye care  (e.g. use of human tissue, child care protection)
+
| colspan="2" |
| colspan="3" |1.   Usually recognizes simple conflict of interest scenarios
+
|
 
 
 
 
2.  Almost always completes medical record-keeping, reporting and critical incident tasks promptly and completely
 
 
 
 
 
3. Maintains up-to-date  portfolio/training log-book
 
 
 
 
 
4.  Always identifies self to patients as resident
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
| colspan="3" |1.  Almost always  recognizes and takes appropriate steps to manage simple conflict of interest  scenarios
 
 
 
 
 
2.  Consistently completes medical record-keeping, reporting and critical  incident tasks promptly and completely
 
 
 
 
 
3. Maintains up-to-date  portfolio/training log-book
 
 
 
 
 
4.  Almost always  recognizes limitations and request help or refer patients when appropriate
 
 
 
 
 
5. Knows specific ophthalmic  conditions requiring use of human tissue
 
| colspan="3" |1.  Consistently recognizes and takes appropriate steps to manage more  complex conflict of interest scenarios
 
 
 
 
 
2.  Consistently acts within limitations and seek help when appropriate
 
 
 
 
 
3. Maintains up-to-date  portfolio/training log-book
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
| colspan="2" |1.  Assumes leadership and  mentoring role in management of more complex conflict of interest scenarios
 
 
 
 
 
2.  Develops  organizational policies and education to support the application of these principles
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
|-
 
|
 
|
 
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |
 
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |
 
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="14" |Comments:             
+
| colspan="15" |Comments:             
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 3,281: Line 3,596:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
'''Assessment Tools''': 360 degree/multisource, oral/written exam, portfolio
 
  
  
===== '''INTERPERSONAL AND COMMUNICATION SKILLS''' =====
 
Residents must demonstrate interpersonal and communication skills that result in the effective exchange of information and collaboration with patients, their families, and health professionals. Residents are expected to:  
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="13" |'''ICS-1: Communicate effectively with  patients and families with diverse socioeconomic and cultural  backgrounds. '''
 
  
'''1.  Rapport development      3.  Counsel and educate'''
+
'''Assessment Tools''': DOPS, OSATS, OSCARs, video review with rubric,
  
'''2.  Interview skills                    4.  Conflict management'''
 
  
'''COECSA COM1,  COM3, COM4, COM7, COM10, COM11, COM12, BP 10, BP11, BP12, BP13'''
+
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="14" |'''PC-7G Globe Trauma'''
 +
 
 +
'''COECSA SS6'''
 
|-
 
|-
|'''Has not'''
+
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 
 
'''Achieved Level 1'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
| colspan="2" |'''Level 3'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
+
| colspan="4" |'''Level 4'''
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
+
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
| colspan="2" |1. Describe indications for and  technique of globe  trauma surgery
| colspan="2" |1.  Develops positive  relationship with patients in uncomplicated situations based on mutual trust;  demonstrate empathy
+
| colspan="3" |1.  Describe common setting for globe trauma and injury prevention
  
2.  Describes factors that  affect communication (e.g. modality, language, use of interpreters, other family in the room, hearing, vision, and cognitive impairments, body  language)
+
2.  Describe use of protective eye shield in potential globe rupture
  
3.  Engages in active listening, teach-back and other strategies to ensure patient understanding.
+
3.  Perform examination under anesthesia for suspected globe rupture
  
4.  Recognizes ethical and  relational communication conflicts
+
4.  Prepare patient with  suspected rupture for surgery
| colspan="3" |1.  Develops positive relationships with  families and team members
 
  
2Identifies special communication needs of vulnerable populations
+
4Describe surgical steps to identify globe rupture
  
3.  Counsels patients  compassionately at appropriate level for comprehension regarding disease:  causes & mechanisms; risk factors; prognosis; management options; risks  & benefits
+
5.  Describe techniques and  sutures for repair of ruptured globe
 +
| colspan="3" |1Obtains informed consent for ruptured globe repair
  
4.  Engages patient in  shared decision-making, based on the patient’s understanding and ability to  carry out the proposed plan
 
 
5.  Negotiates and manages simple  patient/family-related conflicts
 
| colspan="2" |1.  Develops working  relationships in complex situations across specialties and systems of care
 
 
2.  Effectively  communicates with vulnerable populations, both patients at risk and their  families, orally and in writing
 
 
3.  Actively seeks  information from multiple sources, including consultations.
 
 
4.  Organizes  family/patient/team member conferences and facilitate/lead them.
 
 
5.  Counsels patients  regarding emotionally difficult information such as blindness; use  appropriate technique for "breaking bad news"
 
 
6.  Negotiates and manages  conflict in complex 
 
| colspan="3" |1.  Sustains working  relationships during complex and challenging situations including transitions  of care and breaking bad news.
 
 
2.  Coordinates care for  vulnerable populations across health care and social/governmental systems  using both oral and written communication
 
 
3.  Demonstrates effective  integration of all available sources of information when gathering  patient-related data
 
 
4.   Counsels patients  regarding potential short and long term impact of complex, higher risk  disease and intervention; address special needs; direct to resources
 
 
5.  Documents results of  communications, patient preferences, conflict resolution, advance directives
 
| colspan="2" |1.  Sustains relationships  across systems of care and with patients during long-term follow-up
 
 
 
2.  Advocates for vulnerable populations to improve care provided through  healthcare, social/community and governmental systems
 
 
 
3.  Counsels patients regarding unusual or experimental therapies,  including clinical trial participation when indicated
 
 
 
4.  Mentors junior members of the health care team  to improve communication skills
 
  
 +
2.  Perform  closure of corneal or scleral  wounds
  
  
 +
3.  Manage ruptured globes post-operatively,  including complications
 +
| colspan="4" |1. Perform repair of complicated corneal and scleral wounds
 +
| colspan="2" |1. Perform globe trauma surgery  at subspecialty level
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 +
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 +
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="14" |Comments:           
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |
 
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |
 
 
|
 
|
|-
 
| colspan="13" |Comments:           
 
|-
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 3,375: Line 3,662:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|
+
|}  
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
'''Assessment Tools''': 360 degree/msf, OCEX, OSCE, chart review
 
 
 
  
 +
'''Assessment Tools''': DOPS, OSATS, OSCARs, video review with rubric,
  
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="14" |'''ICS-2: Communicate effectively with  physicians, other health professionals, and health related agencies'''
+
| colspan="14" |'''PC-8 Consultation'''  
  
'''1.  Comprehensive, timely, and legible medical records'''
+
'''COECSA BP6, BP7, BP16, BP27, ML3'''
 
 
'''2.  Consultation requests'''
 
 
 
'''3.  Care transition (Patient hand-over)'''
 
 
 
'''4.  Conflict management (workplace)'''
 
 
 
'''COECSA PM8, CEH3'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
|'''Has not'''
+
|'''Level 1'''
 
+
| colspan="2" |'''Level 2'''
'''Achieved'''
 
 
 
'''Level 1'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level  1'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level  3'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level  3'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
| colspan="2" |'''Level  5'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level  5'''
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Level  1'''
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |1. Produces comprehensive, timely, and legible non-ophthalmic medical records
+
| colspan="2" |1.  Describes  the role of ophthalmology consultation in systemic disease
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Provides specific, responsive ophthalmologic consultation to other medical specialties
  
  
2.   Describes effects of computer use on accuracy of information gathering and recording, and potential disruption of the physician patient relationship
+
2.  Recognizes urgent versus non-urgent ophthalmic consultation and seeks help when needed.
  
  
3.  Describes effect of poor communication on the risk of medical error.
+
3.  Examines inpatient at bedside, including visual acuity and field, portable  slit lamp exam (+  fluorescein stain),  IOP measurement, ophthalmoscopy
  
  
4.   Describes importance and procedure for request of consultation.
+
4.  Communicates findings (written and oral) to  consulting service
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Recognizes ophthalmic emergencies and immediate, necessary  interventions
  
  
5Lists steps for appropriate care transition
+
2Provides appropriate differential diagnosis and initiate nonsurgical treatment plan
  
  
6Manages one-on-one conflicts
+
3Orders ancillary testing; request ophthalmic subspecialty involvement when indicated
| colspan="3" |1. Produces comprehensive, timely, and legible ophthalmic medical records
 
  
  
2Ensures that the written record (e.g. EMR, PHR/patient portal, hand-offs, discharge summaries) are accurate and complete, with attention to preventing confusion and error.
+
4Maintains continuing communication with other  involved medical specialists
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Identifies consultations requiring surgical intervention, including procedural options and timing
  
  
3.   Recognizes need for consultation; requests appropriate consultant with assistance
+
2.  Interprets ancillary tests, formulate and initiate treatment plan independently
  
  
4. Performs appropriate basic ophthalmology care transition
+
3Coordinates treatment plan with multiple specialties
  
  
5. Manages conflicts within peer group
 
| colspan="3" |1.  Maintains face-to-face  patient communication while using EMR
 
 
 
2.  Recognizes need,  identifies and requests appropriate consultant
 
 
 
3. Performs more complex subspecialty care transitions; ensures  accurate documentation and face-to-face communication where needed
 
 
 
4.  Manages conflicts  within department
 
 
 
 
| colspan="3" |1.  Effectively and  ethically uses all forms of communication including face-to-face, telephone,  electronic, and social media.
 
 
 
2. Coordinates multiple consultants
 
 
 
3. Manages complex multisystem care transitions
 
 
 
4. Manages conflicts with superiors and payers
 
 
 
 
| colspan="2" |1.  Develops  models/approaches to managing difficult communications
 
  
  
 +
| colspan="2" |1.  Provides ophthalmic subspecialty  consultation when indicated
  
  
Line 3,509: Line 3,752:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
'''Assessment Tools''': 360 degree/msf, OCEX, OSCE, chart review
+
'''Assessment Tools''': Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD), oral/written exams
 
 
  
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="14" |'''ICS-3Work effectively as a member or leader of a healthcare team or other professional  group'''
+
| colspan="14" |'''PC-9  Community Eye Health: Screening, Eye Injuries, Immunizations, Health Promotion'''
  
'''1.  Clinical team (outpatient clinic, inpatient  consult service)'''
+
'''COECSA CEH1, CEH2, CEH5, CEH6'''  
 
 
'''2.  Operating room team'''
 
 
 
'''3.  Professional workgroup, e.g. QI committee'''
 
 
 
'''COECSA  ML7'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|'''Has not'''
 
|'''Has not'''
Line 3,527: Line 3,763:
 
'''Achieved'''
 
'''Achieved'''
  
'''Level 1'''
+
'''pre-residency'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level  2'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level  2'''
Line 3,535: Line 3,771:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |1.  Defines team purpose
+
| colspan="2" |1 understand general principles of  screening and immunization
| colspan="3" |1.  Describes role and responsibility of each team member
+
| colspan="3" |1. understand basic principles of the public health aspect of eye care. 
  
  
2. Prepares for team role and fulfil  assignments
+
2. describe local eye-care screening  and management programs
  
  
3.   Follows institutional policies
+
3. understand global initiatives  that effect eye care (e.g. Vision 2020).
 +
| colspan="3" |1. participate in community  screening and refer when appropriate
  
  
| colspan="3" |1.  Implements team activities as directed by team leader
+
2 educate community about relevant diseases  including eye injuries, immunizations and vitamin deficiencies
  
  
2.   Identifies individual vs. group collaborative roles
+
 
 +
| colspan="3" |1. Apply basic principles of the  public health aspect of eye care. 
  
  
 +
2. Understand how to assess burden  of eye disease and define context specific strategies for control
 +
| colspan="2" |1. organize/conduct new screening  programs and surveys
  
  
| colspan="3" |1.   Selects, evaluates, provides feedback, and remediates team members
+
2. advocate for occupational eye  safety plans
  
  
   2. Identifies team  goals
+
3 develop eye-care health promotion action plan  
 
 
 
 
3. Provides team assignments to achieve team goals
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     4. Designs and implements plan for team improvement
 
| colspan="2" |1.  Develops institutional and organizational  strategies to improve team functions, trains physicians and educators
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
Line 3,594: Line 3,826:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
'''Assessment Tools''': 360 degree/msf, portfolio
+
'''Assessment tools:''' written or oral tests, faculty evaluation 
  
 +
'''MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE'''
  
 +
Residents must demonstrate knowledge of established and evolving basic science, clinical, epidemiological and social-behavioral sciences, as well as the application of this knowledge to patient care. Residents must demonstrate level-appropriate knowledge in the following core domains: anatomy, physiology, biochemistry, molecular and cell biology, genetics, General Medicine; Fundamentals & Principles of Ophthalmology; Optics & Refraction; Ophthalmic Pathology & Intraocular Tumors; Neuro-Ophthalmology; Paediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus; Orbit, Eyelids, & Lacrimal System; Cornea, External Disease, & Anterior Segment Trauma; Lens & Cataract; Refractive Management & Intervention; Intraocular Inflammation & Uveitis; Glaucoma; Retina/Vitreous
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="14" |'''ICS-4: Effectively present didactic  and case-based educational material to physicians and other healthcare professionals'''
+
| colspan="14" |'''MK-1 Demonstrate level-appropriate knowledge'''  
  
'''COECSA ML6'''
+
'''COECSA BCS 1-5'''
 
|-
 
|-
 
|'''Has not'''
 
|'''Has not'''
Line 3,606: Line 3,840:
 
'''Achieved'''
 
'''Achieved'''
  
'''Level 1'''
+
'''pre-residency'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level  1'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level  1'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
Line 3,614: Line 3,848:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |1.  Organizes clear and accurate non-ophthalmic case presentation with level-appropriate diagnostic  and management recommendations
+
| colspan="2" |1.  Has successfully completed internship after basic medical degree graduation
| colspan="3" |1.  Organizes case presentation for basic ophthalmic conditions, with diagnostic and management recommendations
+
| colspan="3" |1.  successfully passes exams of medical knowledge as required to progress through program
 
+
| colspan="3" |1. successfully passes exams of medical knowledge as required to progress through program
 
+
| colspan="3" |1. successfully passes exams of medical knowledge as required to progress through program  
2.  Presents focused literature review
+
| colspan="2" |1.   Achieves COECSA Fellowship certification.
| colspan="3" |1.   Organizes case presentation for more complex ophthalmic conditions, with diagnostic and management recommendations
 
 
 
 
 
2.  Presents comprehensive  literature review
 
| colspan="3" |1.  Schedules, organizes, and implements case-based and didactic conference program
 
 
 
 
 
2.  Mentors presentations
 
 
 
 
 
| colspan="2" |1.  Provides leadership  for conference implementation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
Line 3,663: Line 3,882:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
'''Assessment Tools''': 360 degree/msf, portfolio, faculty evaluation 
+
'''Assessment Tools''':  Viva, written exams (semester/annual), ICO Exams, COECSA Fellowship exam
 +
 
  
===== '''PRACTICE-BASED LEARNING AND IMPROVEMENT''' =====
 
Residents must demonstrate the ability to investigate and evaluate their care of patients, to appraise and assimilate scientific evidence, and to continuously improve patient care based on constant self-evaluation and life-long learning. Residents are expected to develop skills and habits to be able to meet the following goals:
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="14" |'''PBLI-1: Self-Directed Learning'''  
+
| colspan="14" |'''MK-2 Demonstrate level-appropriate knowledge applied to patient management'''  
  
'''1.  Identify  strengths, deficiencies, and limits in one’s knowledge and expertise.'''
+
'''COECSA BCS8, BCS12'''
 
+
|-
'''2.  Set learning and  improvement goals.'''
+
|'''Has not'''
 
 
'''3.  Identify and  perform appropriate learning activities.'''
 
 
 
'''4.  Use information  technology to optimize learning.'''
 
 
 
'''COECSA BP1, BP2, BP3, BP5, BP15, BP15, BP25, BP26, BP28'''
 
|-
 
|'''Has not'''
 
  
 
'''Achieved'''
 
'''Achieved'''
  
'''Level 1'''
+
'''pre-residency'''
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
+
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
+
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |1.  Identifies gaps in personal knowledge and  expertise
+
| colspan="2" |1.   Demonstrates level-appropriate knowledge for patient management on ophthalmology rotation
 
+
| colspan="3" |1.   Demonstrates level-appropriate knowledge for patient management for level
2.  Demonstrates computer literacy and basic computer skills in clinical practice
+
| colspan="3" |1.   Demonstrates level-appropriate knowledge for patient management for  level
| colspan="3" |1.  Assesses performance by self-reflection and review of   feedback and evaluations
+
| colspan="3" |1.  Demonstrates level-appropriate knowledge for patient management on for level
 
+
| colspan="2" |1.   Participates in CPD according to country requirements
2.  Develops a learning plan, based on feedback, with supervision
 
 
 
3.  Utilizes review articles or practice  guidelines to answer specific questions in clinical practice
 
| colspan="3" |1.   Develops learning plan independently with supervision, with accurate assessment of competence and areas for continued improvement
 
 
 
2.  Utilizes appropriate evidence-based information tool to answer specific questions while providing care
 
| colspan="3" |1.  Utilizes self-directed learning with little external guidance
 
 
 
2.  Consistently uses  evidence-based information tools to answer specific questions
 
 
 
3.  Utilizes system or  process for keeping up with relevant changes in medicine
 
| colspan="2" |1.  Maintains knowledge and regular review of  best evidence supporting common practices and acknowledges strengths and  deficiencies
 
 
 
2.  Participates in CPD requirements
 
 
 
48 months
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
Line 3,725: Line 3,919:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="14" |Comments:             
+
| colspan="14" |Comments:             
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
Line 3,742: Line 3,936:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
'''Assessment Tools''': portfolio, faculty evaluation
+
'''Assessment Tools:'''  Observed patient encounter (OCEX CCRS), Viva preferred over written, Case-Based Discussion evaluation 
 
 
  
  
  
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="14" |'''PBLI-2: Locate, appraise, and assimilate evidence from scientific studies related to  their patients’ health problems.'''
+
| colspan="14" |'''MK-3 Equipment Maintenance'''
  
'''COECSA BCS9, BCS11, PM1, PM2, BP1, BP2, BP3, ML5, ML8, ML9,  ML10, ML12'''
+
'''COECSA CEH4'''  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|'''Has not'''
 
|'''Has not'''
Line 3,756: Line 3,949:
 
'''Achieved'''
 
'''Achieved'''
  
'''Level 1'''
+
'''pre-residency'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level  2'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level  2'''
Line 3,764: Line 3,957:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |1.  Describes basic concepts in clinical  epidemiology, biostatistics, and clinical reasoning
+
| colspan="2" |
  
  
2.  Categorizes study design of a research  study
+
Appreciate cost and delicate nature  of ophthalmic equipment
| colspan="3" |1.  Ranks study designs by  validity, generalizability to larger populations, and identifies critical threats to study validity
+
| colspan="3" |1 Able to describe parts and  function of diagnostic equipment/lenses and their basic maintenance
  
2.  Distinguishes relevant  research outcomes from other types of evidence
 
  
3.  Formulates a searchable question from a clinical question and use IT to investigate it
+
2.Use appropriately for their level
 +
| colspan="3" |
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Level appropriate use and maintenance of diagnostic equipment/lenses
 +
 
  
4. Participate in clinical audit
 
| colspan="3" |1.  Applies a set of critical appraisal  criteria to different types of research, including synopses of original  research findings, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and clinical practice  guidelines
 
  
2.  Critically evaluates information from  others: colleagues, experts, pharmaceutical representatives, and  patient-delivered information
+
| colspan="3" |1 Able to describe and teach proper  diagnostic equipment use and maintenance
 +
| colspan="2" |   
  
3. Conduct & interpret clinical audit
+
Works within the system to obtain most cost-efficient equipment
| colspan="3" |1.  Demonstrates a  clinical practice that incorporates principles and basic practices of  evidence-based practice and information mastery
 
  
2. Conduct, interpret and manage junior  residents in clinical audit
 
| colspan="2" |1.  Independently teaches and assesses  evidence-based medicine and information mastery techniques
 
  
2.  Cites evidence supporting several commonly  used techniques in own practice
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
Line 3,815: Line 4,007:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
'''Assessment Tools''': faculty evaluation, portfolio  
+
'''Assessment tools''': faculty evaluation, written/oral test  
 +
 
 +
'''PROFESSIONALISM'''
  
 +
Residents must demonstrate a commitment to carrying out professional responsibilities and an adherence to ethical principles.  Residents are expected to demonstrate:
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="14" |'''PBLI-3 Research Projects/ Dissertation*'''
+
| colspan="14" |'''PROF-1: Compassion, integrity, and respect for others; sensitivity and responsiveness  to diverse patient populations'''
  
·          '''The COECSA Curriculum does not  require a dissertation or research project. This milestone only applies to  programs that require a dissertation or publication of research'''
+
'''COECSA BP18'''
 
|-
 
|-
 
|'''Has not'''
 
|'''Has not'''
Line 3,826: Line 4,021:
 
'''Achieved'''
 
'''Achieved'''
  
'''Level 1'''
+
'''pre-residency'''
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
+
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
+
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |1 Be aware that a dissertation or research project is required
+
| colspan="2" |1.  Recognizes and never participates in:
| colspan="3" |1.  Learn about research methods
+
 
 +
verbal or physical abuse to patients, peers, staff, or supervisors; sexual harassment
 +
 
  
2. Identify dissertation/ research topic
+
2.  Recognizes and never participates in:
| colspan="3" |1.  Dissertation/Research  proposal  completed & approved by deadline set by program
 
  
2. Data collection has started
+
discrimination  based on gender, age, culture, race, religion, disability, sexual  orientation, socioeconomic status
| colspan="3" |1. Completed Data collection
+
| colspan="3" |1.  Consistently demonstrates behaviour that  conveys caring, honesty, and genuine interest in patients and families
  
2. Completed & submitted dissertation/ research paper
+
2.   Demonstrates compassion, integrity, respect, sensitivity, and  responsiveness
  
3. Published at least 1 article
+
3.  Exhibits these attitudes consistently in  common and uncomplicated situations
  
4. Presented research in a conference
+
4.  Usually recognizes cultural and  socioeconomic issues in patient care 
| colspan="2" |1.  Continue publishing
+
| colspan="3" |1.   Exhibits these attitudes in complex and complicated situations
  
4. Presented research in an international  conference
+
 
|-
+
2.  Almost always recognizes cultural and  socioeconomic issues in patient care
|
+
 
|
+
 
 +
3. Adheres to ethical principles
 +
 
 +
 
 +
| colspan="3" |1. Exhibits these attitudes consistently in  all relationships and situations
 +
 
 +
 
 +
2.  Consistently recognizes cultural and  socioeconomic issues in patient care
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
| colspan="2" |1. Role models behavior  demonstrating compassion and respect for others, cultural and socioeconomic issues in patient  care
 +
 
 +
 
 +
2. Mentors junior members of health  care teams
 +
 
 +
 
 +
3. Develops organizational policies  and education to support the application of these principles
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
Line 3,863: Line 4,079:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="14" |Comments:             
+
| colspan="14" |Comments:             
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
Line 3,880: Line 4,096:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
Assessment: Supervisor Review, Dissertation Grade 
+
'''             Assessment Tools''': 360 degree/multisource feedback, OSCE
 +
 
 +
 
  
===== '''SYSTEMS-BASED PRACTICE''' =====
 
Residents must demonstrate an awareness of and responsiveness to the larger context and system of health care, as well as the ability to call effectively on other resources in the system to provide optimal health care. Residents are expected to:
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="14" |'''SBP-1: Work effectively and coordinate patient care in various health care delivery systems'''  
+
| colspan="15" |'''PROF 2: Responsiveness to patient needs that supersedes self-interest'''
  
'''COECSA BP6, ML1'''
+
'''COECSA BP18, BP24, BP30'''
 
|-
 
|-
 
|'''Has not'''
 
|'''Has not'''
Line 3,893: Line 4,109:
 
'''Achieved'''
 
'''Achieved'''
  
'''Level 1'''
+
'''pre-residency'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level  1'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Level  1'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level  3'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level  3'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
 
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
| colspan="2" |'''Level  5'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level  5'''
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |1.  Describes basic levels of systems of care (self-management to societal)
+
| colspan="2" |1.  Recognizes and never participates in:
| colspan="3" |1.   Describes systems of care within residency training program
+
 
 +
refusal to perform assigned tasks, answer pages or calls;  avoidance of scheduled call duty
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Almost always completes patient care tasks promptly and completely;  punctual; appropriately groomed
 +
 
 +
2.  Manages  fatigue, sleep deprivation and personal health issues.
 +
 
 +
3Identifies impact of personal beliefs and values on practice of medicine
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Consistently completes  patient care tasks promptly  and completely; punctual; appropriately groomed
  
2.  Lists potential impediments to safe and efficient handovers of care  within and between systems
 
| colspan="3" |1.  Identifies impediments  to safe and efficient referrals within and between systems
 
  
2.  Manages routine handovers safely
+
2.  Manages  personal beliefs and values to avoid negative impact on patient care
| colspan="3" |1.  Proposes solutions to impediments to safe and efficient transitions of care within and between  systems
+
| colspan="3" |1.   Monitors fatigue, sleep deprivation and personal health in junior members of health care team
  
2.  Manages complex  handovers of care within and between systems
 
| colspan="2" |1.  Leads systems change  at micro and macro level
 
  
 +
2.  Mentors junior members of the healthcare team to manage barriers to  effective patient care 
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Role models behavior demonstrating  compassion and respect for others
  
  
 +
2.  Develops  organizational policies and education to support the application of these  principles
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
Line 3,925: Line 4,147:
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
 +
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="14" |Comments:             
+
| colspan="15" |Comments:             
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 3,944: Line 4,168:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
'''Assessment Tools''': faculty evaluation, 360 degree/msf 
+
'''Assessment Tools''' 360 degree/multisource feedback
 +
 
 +
 
  
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="15" |'''SBP-2Incorporate cost-effectiveness, risk/benefit analysis, and IT to promote safe  and effective patient care'''
+
| colspan="14" |'''PROF-3: Respect for patient privacy and autonomy'''
  
'''COECSA ML11'''
+
'''COECSA BP14, BP18, BP21'''
 
|-
 
|-
 
|'''Has not'''
 
|'''Has not'''
Line 3,955: Line 4,181:
 
'''Achieved'''
 
'''Achieved'''
  
'''Level 1'''
+
'''pre-residency'''
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
+
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 5'''
+
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |1.  Describes scenarios in which physician may  affect cost-effectiveness in patient care
+
| colspan="2" |1.   Conforms to national patient rights regulations
  
 +
2.  Recognizes and never participates in:
  
2.  Explains the role of the Electronic Health  Record (EHR) in prevention of medical errors
+
unauthorized examination of patient records
| colspan="3" |1.  Describes cost-effectiveness in patient care
 
  
2.  Aware of cost options for most frequently ordered tests and medications
+
disclosure of protected health information to unauthorized  personnel
 +
| colspan="3" |1.   Almost always: recognizes and implements required procedures for  patient involvement in human research; inform patients of rights; involve  patients in medical decision-making
 +
| colspan="3" |
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Consistently recognizes and implements required procedures for patient involvement in human research; informs patients of rights; involves patients  in medical decision-making
  
3.  Utilizes where available the Electronic Health Record (EHR) to order tests and medications, document notes; 3Demonstrate medication reconciliation for patients
+
2.   Mentors junior members of the healthcare team regarding protection of patient privacy
 +
| colspan="2" |1Role models behavior regarding protection of patient privacy
  
4.  Uses information systems for patient care
+
2Mentors residents  involved in administration of research projects involving humans
| colspan="3" |1Almost always practices cost-effective care
 
  
 
+
3.  Develops organizational policies and education to support the application of these principles
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
| colspan="3" |1Consistently practices cost-effective care
 
 
 
 
 
2.  Applies risk-benefit analyses in ophthalmic care
 
 
 
 
 
3.  Contributes to reduction of risks of  automation and computerized systems by reporting system problems
 
| colspan="3" |1.  Advocates for  cost-effective care and use of risk-benefit analyses within health care  system
 
 
 
 
 
2.  Recommends systems re-design for faulty computerized processes
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
Line 4,003: Line 4,216:
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |
|
 
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="15" |Comments:             
+
| colspan="14" |Comments:             
 
|-
 
|-
|
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 4,024: Line 4,235:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
'''Assessment Tools''': faculty evaluation
+
'''            Assessment Tools''': 360 degree/multisource
 +
 
 +
 
  
  
  
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="14" |'''SBP-3: Work in inter-professional  teams to enhance patient safety, identify system errors and implement  solutions'''  
+
| colspan="14" |'''PROF-4: Accountability to patients, society and the profession'''
  
'''COECSA ML2, ML4,'''  
+
'''COECSA BP4, BP8, BP9, BP17, BP18,  BP19, BP20, BP22, BP23'''  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|'''Has not'''
 
|'''Has not'''
Line 4,037: Line 4,250:
 
'''Achieved'''
 
'''Achieved'''
  
'''Level 1'''
+
'''pre-residency'''
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
+
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
+
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |1.  Describes epidemiology  of medical errors and differences between medical errors, near misses, and  sentinel events
+
| colspan="2" |1.   Recognizes and never participates in:
 +
 
 +
deception regarding level of training and experience, medical errors; demeaning other practitioners
  
2.  Describes role of  teamwork and communication failure in healthcare as a leading cause of  preventable patient harm
 
| colspan="3" |1.  Reports problematic  processes including errors and near misses to supervisor
 
  
2.  Describes use of checklists  and briefings to prevent adverse events in healthcare
+
2.   Recognizes and never participates in:
| colspan="3" |1.  Analyses causes of  adverse events through root cause analysis (RCA)
 
  
2.  Applies checklist-guided briefings in healthcare activities
+
plagiarism, falsification of records, misrepresentation of training, unexplained absences
  
3. Can function as the leader of the team when called upon.
 
| colspan="3" |1.  Develops content for  and facilitate patient safety M&M presentation or conference focusing on  systems-based errors in patient care
 
  
2.  Analyses shared team experience (e.g. procedure) with debriefing to solve problems
+
3. Adheres to national legal requirements for medical practice
  
3. Can function as the leader of the team when called upon.
 
| colspan="2" |1.  Designs checklists for  use in healthcare
 
  
2.  Creates curriculum to teach teamwork and communication skills to healthcare professionals
+
4. Aware of local guidelines and legislature impacting eye care (e.g. use of human tissue, child care protection)
|-
+
| colspan="3" |1.  Usually recognizes simple conflict of interest scenarios
|
+
 
|
+
 
| colspan="2" |
+
2.  Almost always completes medical record-keeping, reporting and critical  incident tasks promptly and completely
|
+
 
| colspan="2" |
+
 
|
+
3. Maintains up-to-date  portfolio/training log-book
| colspan="2" |
+
 
|
+
 
| colspan="2" |
+
4.  Always identifies self to patients as resident
|
+
 
|-
+
 
| colspan="14" |Comments:           
+
 
|-
+
 
|
+
 
|
+
| colspan="3" |1.  Almost always  recognizes and takes appropriate steps to manage simple conflict of interest  scenarios
|
+
 
|
+
 
|
+
2.  Consistently completes medical record-keeping, reporting and critical  incident tasks promptly and completely
|
+
 
|
+
 
|
+
3. Maintains up-to-date  portfolio/training log-book
|
+
 
|
+
 
|
+
4.  Almost always  recognizes limitations and request help or refer patients when appropriate
|
+
 
|
+
 
|
+
5. Knows specific ophthalmic  conditions requiring use of human tissue
|}
+
| colspan="3" |1.  Consistently recognizes and takes appropriate steps to manage more  complex conflict of interest scenarios
'''Assessment Tools''': faculty evaluation
+
 
 +
 
 +
2.  Consistently acts within limitations and seek help when appropriate
 +
 
 +
 
 +
3. Maintains up-to-date  portfolio/training log-book
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
| colspan="2" |1.  Assumes leadership and  mentoring role in management of more complex conflict of interest scenarios
 +
 
 +
 
 +
2.  Develops  organizational policies and education to support the application of these principles
 +
 
  
==== '''''WORKPLACE BASED ASSESSMENTS''''' ====
 
  
===== Clinical Rating Scale =====
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|'''CRS'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Learning Outcome'''
 
|'''Target Year (TYA)<sup>#</sup>'''
 
|'''Assessor*'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
|CRS1
+
|
|CA1
+
|
|Consultation
+
| colspan="2" |
|1 annual review
+
|
|Cons
+
| colspan="2" |
 +
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 +
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 +
|
 
|-
 
|-
|CRS2
+
| colspan="14" |Comments:           
|CA2
 
|Vision
 
|1
 
|Cons/AHP
 
 
|-
 
|-
|CRS3
+
|
|CA3
+
|
|Fields
+
|
|1
+
|
|Cons
+
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|}
 +
'''Assessment Tools''': 360 degree/multisource, oral/written exam, portfolio
 +
 
 +
 
 +
===== '''INTERPERSONAL AND COMMUNICATION SKILLS''' =====
 +
Residents must demonstrate interpersonal and communication skills that result in the effective exchange of information and collaboration with patients, their families, and health professionals. Residents are expected to:  
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="13" |'''ICS-1: Communicate effectively with  patients and families with diverse socioeconomic and cultural  backgrounds. '''
 +
 
 +
'''1.  Rapport development      3.  Counsel and educate'''
 +
 
 +
'''2.  Interview skills                    4.  Conflict management'''
 +
 
 +
'''COECSA COM1,  COM3, COM4, COM7, COM10, COM11, COM12, BP 10, BP11, BP12, BP13'''
 
|-
 
|-
|CRS4
+
|'''Has not'''
|CA4
+
 
|External eye
+
'''Achieved Level 1'''
|1
+
| colspan="2" |'''Level  1'''
|Cons
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Level  3'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Level  5'''
 
|-
 
|-
|CRS5
+
|
|CA5
+
| colspan="2" |1.  Develops positive  relationship with patients in uncomplicated situations based on mutual trust;  demonstrate empathy
|Pupil
+
 
|1
+
2.  Describes factors that  affect communication (e.g. modality, language, use of interpreters, other  family in the room, hearing, vision, and cognitive impairments, body  language)
|Cons
+
 
|-
+
3.  Engages in active  listening, teach-back and other strategies to ensure patient understanding.
|CRS6
+
 
|CA6
+
4.  Recognizes ethical and  relational communication conflicts
|Ocular motility
+
| colspan="3" |1.  Develops positive relationships with  families and team members
|2
+
 
|Cons
+
2.  Identifies special  communication needs of vulnerable populations
|-
 
|CRS7
 
|CA7
 
|IOP
 
|1
 
|Cons/AHP
 
|-
 
|CRS8
 
|CA8
 
|Slit lamp
 
|1
 
|Cons
 
|-
 
|CRS9a, CRS9b
 
  
CRS9c,  CRS9d
+
3.  Counsels patients  compassionately at appropriate level for comprehension regarding disease: causes & mechanisms; risk factors; prognosis; management options; risks  & benefits
|CA9
 
|Fundus
 
|2
 
|Cons
 
|-
 
|CRSret
 
|PS2
 
|Retinoscopy (Paed)
 
|3
 
|Cons/Optometrist
 
|}
 
<nowiki>*</nowiki> Assessors:
 
  
* Cons: consultant ophthalmologist
+
4.  Engages patient in  shared decision-making, based on the patient’s understanding and ability to  carry out the proposed plan
* AHP: appropriately trained allied health professional (nurse, orthoptist,    optometrist)
 
  
===== Clinical Rating Scale CRS1 (Outcome CA1: CLINICAL HISTORY) =====
+
5.  Negotiates and manages simple  patient/family-related conflicts
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
+
| colspan="2" |1.  Develops working  relationships in complex situations across specialties and systems of care
  
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRS1      (Outcome CA1-Clinical History)'''
+
2.  Effectively  communicates with vulnerable populations, both patients at risk and their  families, orally and in writing
  
All trainees must be able to take a clinical history from a patient, which is appropriate for the clinical problem and the individual patient’s needs.
+
3.  Actively seeks  information from multiple sources, including consultations.
  
 +
4.  Organizes  family/patient/team member conferences and facilitate/lead them.
  
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                                       Date (dd/mm/yyyy)            
+
5.  Counsels patients  regarding emotionally difficult information such as blindness; use  appropriate technique for "breaking bad news"
  
YEAR 1                                       YEAR 2                           YEAR 3                    YEAR 4          Other (specify)
+
6.  Negotiates and manages  conflict in complex 
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Sustains working  relationships during complex and challenging situations including transitions  of care and breaking bad news.
  
Assessor's name                                                                                          Type of assessment:  Formative        Summative                                                                
+
2.  Coordinates care for  vulnerable populations across health care and social/governmental systems  using both oral and written communication
  
 +
3.  Demonstrates effective  integration of all available sources of information when gathering  patient-related data
  
Assessor's status           Consultant                       Senior Trainee              Other (Specify)
+
4.   Counsels patients  regarding potential short and long term impact of complex, higher risk  disease and intervention; address special needs; direct to resources
 +
 
 +
5.  Documents results of  communications, patient preferences, conflict resolution, advance directives
 +
| colspan="2" |1.  Sustains relationships  across systems of care and with patients during long-term follow-up
 +
 
 +
 
 +
2.  Advocates for vulnerable populations to improve care provided through  healthcare, social/community and governmental systems
 +
 
 +
 
 +
3.  Counsels patients regarding unusual or experimental therapies,  including clinical trial participation when indicated
 +
 
 +
 
 +
4.  Mentors junior members of the health care team  to improve communication skills
  
Brief description of case                                       
 
  
'''Please grade the following areas using the scale below''' (use tick or cross)
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Attitude and manner'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' introduce themselves and establish the name  of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer). Their  demeanour throughout the interview shows that they are actively listening to  the patient by gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact.  They establish a good rapport with the patient which is respectful of any  ethnic, religious or social preferences that they express. They are empathic  and sensitive to the patient’s concerns.
 
  
'''Poor trainees''' neither introduce themselves nor identify the patient.  They hurry the patient and ignore what the  patient is saying.  They look away or  appear impatient during the history taking.  There are unable to establish rapport with the patient and show  little respect.
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Introduction and start of interview
 
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 +
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Rapport with patient and development of trust
+
| colspan="13" |Comments:           
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
|Listening skills, appropriate eye contact and non-verbal  communication
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 4,225: Line 4,439:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|-
 
|Empathy and sensitivity
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Respect for patient
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 4,240: Line 4,448:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
 +
'''Assessment Tools''': 360 degree/msf, OCEX, OSCE, chart review
 +
 +
 +
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="6" |'''Information gathering'''
+
| colspan="14" |'''ICS-2: Communicate effectively with  physicians, other health professionals, and health related agencies'''
 +
 
 +
'''1.  Comprehensive, timely, and legible medical records'''
 +
 
 +
'''2.  Consultation requests'''
 +
 
 +
'''3.  Care transition (Patient hand-over)'''
 +
 
 +
'''4.  Conflict management (workplace)'''
 +
 
 +
'''COECSA PM8, CEH3'''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' capture all of the appropriate information  required for the ophthalmic examination and diagnosis, the planning of  investigations and subsequent management. Their questions are structured and  guided by the differential diagnosis suggested by the presenting complaint.
+
|'''Has not'''
 +
 
 +
'''Achieved'''
  
'''Poor trainees''' ask questions by rote.  They omit important areas.  They do not pursue an appropriate line of questioning informed by a differential diagnosis.
+
'''Level 1'''
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Level  5'''
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
|'''Poor'''
+
| colspan="2" |1. Produces comprehensive, timely, and  legible non-ophthalmic medical records
|'''Fair'''
+
 
|'''Good'''
+
 
|'''V Good'''
+
2.  Describes effects of computer use on accuracy of information gathering  and recording, and potential disruption of the physician patient relationship
|'''n/a'''
+
 
|-
+
 
|History of presenting complaint
+
3.  Describes effect of poor communication on the risk of medical error.
|
+
 
|
+
 
|
+
4.  Describes importance and procedure for request of consultation.
|
+
 
|
+
 
|-
+
5.  Lists steps for  appropriate care transition
|Past ophthalmic history
+
 
|
+
 
|
+
6.  Manages one-on-one  conflicts
|
+
| colspan="3" |1. Produces comprehensive, timely, and legible ophthalmic medical records
|
+
 
|
+
 
|-
+
2.  Ensures that the  written record (e.g. EMR, PHR/patient portal, hand-offs, discharge summaries)  are accurate and complete, with attention to preventing confusion and error.
|Family history
+
 
|
+
 
|
+
3.  Recognizes need for consultation; requests appropriate consultant with  assistance
|
+
 
|
+
 
|
+
4. Performs appropriate basic  ophthalmology care transition
|-
+
 
|Past medical history/general health
+
 
|
+
5. Manages conflicts within peer group
|
+
| colspan="3" |1.  Maintains face-to-face  patient communication while using EMR
|
+
 
|
+
 
|
+
2.  Recognizes need,  identifies and requests appropriate consultant
 +
 
 +
 
 +
3. Performs more complex subspecialty care transitions; ensures  accurate documentation and face-to-face communication where needed
 +
 
 +
 
 +
4.  Manages conflicts  within department
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Effectively and  ethically uses all forms of communication including face-to-face, telephone,  electronic, and social media.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
2. Coordinates multiple consultants
 +
 
 +
 
 +
3. Manages complex multisystem care transitions
 +
 
 +
 
 +
4. Manages conflicts with superiors and payers
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
| colspan="2" |1.  Develops  models/approaches to managing difficult communications
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 
|-
 
|-
|Systems enquiry
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 +
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Drug history and allergies
+
| colspan="14" |Comments:           
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
|Social history
 
|
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|-
 
|Other relevant enquiries pertinent to case
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 4,309: Line 4,569:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|-
 
|Assessment of mental state
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 4,317: Line 4,575:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
 +
'''Assessment Tools''': 360 degree/msf, OCEX, OSCE, chart review
 +
 +
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="6" |'''Awareness'''
+
| colspan="14" |'''ICS-3:  Work effectively as a member or leader of a healthcare team or other professional  group'''
|-
+
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' are attentive the patient’s anxiety and  main concernsThey are sensitive to  the social impact of the patient’s problems.  They adapt the interview appropriately as determined by the patient’s  age, mental state and any communication problems such as poor hearing or language barriers.
+
'''1Clinical team (outpatient clinic, inpatient consult service)'''
  
'''Poor trainees''' disregard the patient’s main concerns or anxieties and any impact their problem may have on their social circumstances. They are insensitive to the potential barriers to good communication raised by extremes of age, mental state, hearing impairment or language.
+
'''2.  Operating room team'''
|-
+
 
 +
'''3.  Professional workgroup, e.g. QI committee'''
 +
 
 +
'''COECSA ML7'''
 +
|-
 +
|'''Has not'''
 +
 
 +
'''Achieved'''
 +
 
 +
'''Level 1'''
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 +
|-
 
|
 
|
|'''Poor'''
+
| colspan="2" |1.  Defines team purpose
|'''Fair'''
+
| colspan="3" |1.  Describes  role and responsibility of each team member
|'''Good'''
+
 
|'''V Good'''
+
 
|'''n/a'''
+
2. Prepares for team role and fulfil  assignments
 +
 
 +
 
 +
3.  Follows institutional policies
 +
 
 +
 
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Implements team activities as directed by team leader
 +
 
 +
 
 +
2.  Identifies individual vs. group collaborative roles
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Selects, evaluates, provides feedback, and remediates team members
 +
 
 +
 
 +
   2. Identifies team  goals
 +
 
 +
 
 +
3. Provides  team assignments to achieve team goals
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
     4. Designs and implements plan for team improvement
 +
| colspan="2" |1.  Develops institutional and organizational  strategies to improve team functions, trains physicians and educators
 
|-
 
|-
|Sensitive and responsive to patient anxieties and concerns
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 +
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Aware of the social impact of problems for patient
+
| colspan="14" |Comments:            
 +
|-
 +
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 4,344: Line 4,651:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|-
 
|Interview sensitive and responsive to age of patient, mental  state and any communication problems
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 4,351: Line 4,656:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|}
+
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|}
 +
'''Assessment Tools''': 360 degree/msf, portfolio
 +
 
 +
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="6" |'''Management of interview'''
+
| colspan="14" |'''ICS-4: Effectively present didactic  and case-based educational material to physicians and other healthcare  professionals'''
 +
 
 +
'''COECSA ML6'''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' are skilled in questioning with an  appropriate mixture of open and closed questions.  They clarify what they have understood and  check this with the patient by appropriate summaries. They use the time  efficiently and guide the patient with sensitivity. They explain terms  appropriately and finish the interview effectively, making future plans  clear.
+
|'''Has not'''
 +
 
 +
'''Achieved'''
  
'''Poor trainees''' ask closed questions which do not encourage the patient to tell her/his story. They do not clarify points or attempt to summarise.  They waste time through repetition or inappropriate questioning. They do not guide the patient appropriately.  Information if provided at all unclear or too technical.  They do not make it  clear when the interview has come to an end or what the next step is.
+
'''Level 1'''
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
|'''Poor'''
+
| colspan="2" |1.  Organizes clear and  accurate non-ophthalmic case presentation with level-appropriate diagnostic  and management recommendations
|'''Fair'''
+
| colspan="3" |1.  Organizes case presentation for basic ophthalmic conditions, with  diagnostic and management recommendations
|'''Good'''
+
 
|'''V Good'''
+
 
|'''n/a'''
+
2.  Presents focused literature review
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Organizes case presentation for more complex ophthalmic conditions,  with diagnostic and management recommendations
 +
 
 +
 
 +
2.  Presents comprehensive  literature review
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Schedules, organizes,  and implements case-based and didactic conference program
 +
 
 +
 
 +
2.  Mentors presentations
 +
 
 +
 
 +
| colspan="2" |1.  Provides leadership  for conference implementation
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 
|-
 
|-
|Mode of enquiry: appropriate use of closed, open, directed and  probing questions.  Clarification and  summarising.
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 +
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Appropriate control and direction
+
| colspan="14" |Comments:           
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
|Efficient use of time
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 4,386: Line 4,719:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|-
 
|Delivery of information
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|
 
|-
 
|Termination of interview
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 4,401: Line 4,729:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
{| class="wikitable"
+
'''Assessment Tools''': 360 degree/msf, portfolio, faculty evaluation  
|'''Overall performance in this  assessment'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V  Good'''
 
|-
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
'''Summative Outcome ('''Delete as appropriate if tool used for summative assessments)'''                             Pass/Fail'''
 
''Pass/Fail = Meets expectation /Does not meet expectation for stage of training''
 
  ''' '''
 
  
''(Note: "Pass" requires an overall assessment grade of "Good" and '''NO''' individual "Poor" grades''
+
===== '''PRACTICE-BASED LEARNING AND IMPROVEMENT''' =====
 
+
Residents must demonstrate the ability to investigate and evaluate their care of patients, to appraise and assimilate scientific evidence, and to continuously improve patient care based on constant self-evaluation and life-long learning. Residents are expected to develop skills and habits to be able to meet the following goals:
 
 
'''Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.'''
 
 
 
              
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
|
+
| colspan="14" |'''PBLI-1:  Self-Directed Learning'''
  
 +
'''1.  Identify  strengths, deficiencies, and limits in one’s knowledge and expertise.'''
  
Anything especially good?
+
'''2.  Set learning and  improvement goals.'''
 
 
  
 +
'''3.  Identify and  perform appropriate learning activities.'''
  
 +
'''4.  Use information  technology to optimize learning.'''
  
 +
'''COECSA BP1, BP2, BP3, BP5, BP15, BP15, BP25, BP26, BP28'''
 +
|-
 +
|'''Has not'''
  
 +
'''Achieved'''
  
 +
'''Level 1'''
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level  2'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level  4'''
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 +
|-
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |1.  Identifies gaps in personal knowledge and  expertise
  
 +
2.  Demonstrates computer literacy and basic  computer skills in clinical practice
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Assesses performance by self-reflection and  review of   feedback and evaluations
  
Suggestions for development:
+
2.  Develops a learning plan, based on feedback, with supervision
  
 +
3.  Utilizes review articles or practice  guidelines to answer specific questions in clinical practice
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Develops learning plan independently with supervision, with accurate  assessment of competence and areas for continued improvement
  
 +
2.  Utilizes appropriate evidence-based information tool to answer  specific questions while providing care
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Utilizes self-directed learning with little  external guidance
  
 +
2.  Consistently uses  evidence-based information tools to answer specific questions
  
|-
+
3.  Utilizes system or  process for keeping up with relevant changes in medicine
| colspan="2" |
+
| colspan="2" |1.  Maintains knowledge and regular review of  best evidence supporting common practices and acknowledges strengths and  deficiencies
  
 +
2.  Participates in CPD requirements
  
Agreed action:
+
48 months
 
+
|-
 
+
|
 
+
|
 
+
| colspan="2" |
 
+
|
|}
+
| colspan="2" |
              
+
|
 
+
| colspan="2" |
 
+
|
'''Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee:'''
+
| colspan="2" |
 
+
|
===== Clinical Rating Scale CRS2 (Outcome CA2: ASSESS Vision) =====
 
 
 
 
 
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 
 
 
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRS2 (Outcome CA2: Assess Vision)'''
 
 
 
All trainees must be able to assess visual acuity for near and distance using an appropriate method and interpret the results. They must be aware of and be able to interpret and apply newer methods of assessing visual acuity when they are introduced into clinical practice. They must be able to test colour vision using an appropriate method and interpret the results. They should also know the principles of the assessment of contrast sensitivity. They must be able to assess vision in children and in adults who have language and other barriers to communication. They must be able to assess vision in circumstances outside the OPD environment.
 
 
 
 
 
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                                Date (dd/mm/yyyy)                     
 
 
 
YEAR 1                                YEAR 2                   YEAR 3            YEAR 4             Other (specify)
 
 
 
Assessor's name                                                                                             Type of assessment:  Formative           Summative                                                                
 
 
 
Assessor's status           Consultant                       Senior Trainee                    Other (Specify)
 
 
 
Brief description of case                                       
 
 
 
 
 
'''Please grade the following areas using the scale below''' (use tick or cross)
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Attitude and manner'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' introduce themselves and establish the name of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer). Their  demeanour throughout shows that they are attentive to the patient by  gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They explain  the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out.
+
| colspan="14" |Comments:           
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' neither introduce themselves nor identify  the patient.  They hurry the patient  and ignore what the patient is saying.  They do not explain the test in an appropriate manner.
 
|-
 
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
|Introduction and explanation of test
 
|
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|-
 
|Rapport with patient, empathy and  sensitivity to age and context
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 4,508: Line 4,802:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|-
 
|Respect for patient
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 4,516: Line 4,808:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
{| class="wikitable"
+
'''Assessment Tools''': portfolio, faculty evaluation
| colspan="6" |'''Visual acuity Method*: Snellen/LogMar/Sheridan-Gardner/other,  specify'''
 
  
(* Please circle method as appropriate or specify  “other”…………………………………………….)
 
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''Very good trainees''' occlude each eye in turn to perform  the test.  They use an appropriate form  of visual acuity assessment determined by the patient’s age and level of  understanding.  They can compare  results from different tests.  They use  appropriate refractive correction and instruct the patient on the best use of  a pinhole. They record the visual acuity correctly.
 
  
'''Poor trainees''' do not occlude appropriately.  They do not use an appropriate test method.  They do not understand the equivalence of results from different tests.  They do not use an appropriate method of correcting refractive error. The visual acuity is recorded inaccurately or incorrectly.
+
 
 +
 
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="14" |'''PBLI-2:  Locate, appraise, and assimilate evidence from scientific studies related to  their patients’ health problems.'''
 +
 
 +
'''COECSA BCS9, BCS11, PM1, PM2, BP1, BP2, BP3, ML5, ML8, ML9,  ML10, ML12'''
 +
|-
 +
|'''Has not'''
 +
 
 +
'''Achieved'''
 +
 
 +
'''Level 1'''
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
|'''Poor'''
+
| colspan="2" |1.  Describes basic concepts in clinical  epidemiology, biostatistics, and clinical reasoning
|'''Fair'''
+
 
|'''Good'''
+
 
|'''V Good'''
+
2.  Categorizes study design of a research  study
|'''n/a'''
+
| colspan="3" |1.  Ranks study designs by  validity, generalizability to larger populations, and identifies critical  threats to study validity
 +
 
 +
2.  Distinguishes relevant  research outcomes from other types of evidence
 +
 
 +
3.  Formulates a  searchable question from a clinical question and use IT to investigate it
 +
 
 +
4. Participate in clinical audit
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Applies a set of critical appraisal  criteria to different types of research, including synopses of original  research findings, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and clinical practice  guidelines
 +
 
 +
2.  Critically evaluates information from  others: colleagues, experts, pharmaceutical representatives, and  patient-delivered information
 +
 
 +
3.  Conduct & interpret clinical audit
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Demonstrates a  clinical practice that incorporates principles and basic practices of  evidence-based practice and information mastery
 +
 
 +
2. Conduct, interpret and manage junior  residents in clinical audit
 +
| colspan="2" |1.  Independently teaches and assesses  evidence-based medicine and information mastery techniques
 +
 
 +
2.  Cites evidence supporting several commonly  used techniques in own practice
 
|-
 
|-
|Appropriate occlusion
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 +
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Technique of assessment appropriate for age and context
+
| colspan="14" |Comments:            
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
|Appropriate use of refractive correction
 
|
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|-
 
|Appropriate use of pinhole
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 4,559: Line 4,875:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|-
 
|Accurate recording of distance acuity
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 4,566: Line 4,880:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 +
|}
 +
'''Assessment Tools''': faculty evaluation, portfolio 
 +
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="14" |'''PBLI-3 Research Projects/  Dissertation*'''
 +
 +
·          '''The COECSA Curriculum does not  require a dissertation or research project. This milestone only applies to  programs that require a dissertation or publication of research'''
 +
|-
 +
|'''Has not'''
 +
 +
'''Achieved'''
 +
 +
'''Level 1'''
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Level  1'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level  3'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Level  5'''
 
|-
 
|-
|Accurate recording of near acuity
 
 
|
 
|
|
+
| colspan="2" |1 Be aware that a dissertation or research project is required
|
+
| colspan="3" |1.  Learn about research  methods
|
+
 
|
+
2. Identify dissertation/ research topic
|}
+
| colspan="3" |1.  Dissertation/Research  proposal  completed & approved by deadline set by program
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
+
 
 +
2. Data collection has started
 +
| colspan="3" |1. Completed Data collection
  
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRS2 (Outcome CA2: Assess Vision)'''
+
2. Completed & submitted dissertation/ research paper
  
All trainees must be able to assess visual acuity for near and distance using an appropriate method and interpret the results. They must be aware of and be able to interpret and apply newer methods of assessing visual acuity when they are introduced into clinical practice. They must be able to test colour vision using an appropriate method and interpret the results. They should also know the principles of the assessment of contrast sensitivity. They must be able to assess vision in children and in adults who have language and other barriers to communication. They must be able to assess vision in circumstances outside the OPD environment.
+
3. Published at least 1 article
  
{| class="wikitable"
+
4. Presented research in a conference
| colspan="6" |'''Colour vision (Method: Ishihara/other  pseudoisochromatic/other)'''
+
| colspan="2" |1Continue publishing
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' occlude each eye in turn to perform the  testThey use an appropriate form of  colour vision assessment determined by the patient’s age and level of  understanding.  They can compare  results from different tests. They record the results of the colour vision  test correctly and know how to interpret them.
 
  
'''Poor trainees''' do not occlude appropriately.  They do not choose an appropriate test  method.  They do not understand the equivalence of results from different tests.  The colour vision is recorded inaccurately  or incorrectly.  They do not understand  the implications of the result.
+
4. Presented research in an international  conference
 
|-
 
|-
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Appropriate occlusion
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 +
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Technique of assessment appropriate for age and context
+
| colspan="14" |Comments:           
|
+
|-
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|-
 
|Appropriate use of colour vision test
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 4,614: Line 4,940:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|-
 
|Accurate recording of colour vision
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 4,622: Line 4,946:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
 +
Assessment: Supervisor Review, Dissertation Grade 
 +
 +
===== '''SYSTEMS-BASED PRACTICE''' =====
 +
Residents must demonstrate an awareness of and responsiveness to the larger context and system of health care, as well as the ability to call effectively on other resources in the system to provide optimal health care. Residents are expected to:
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
|'''Overall performance in this  assessment'''
+
| colspan="14" |'''SBP-1: Work effectively and  coordinate patient care in various health care delivery systems'''  
|'''Poor'''
+
 
|'''Fair'''
+
'''COECSA BP6, ML1'''
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V  Good'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|'''Has not'''
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
'''Summative Outcome ('''Delete as appropriate if tool used for summative assessments)'''                             Pass/Fail '''
 
  
''(Note: "Pass" requires an overall assessment grade of "Good" and '''NO''' individual "Poor" grades.)''''' '''
+
'''Achieved'''
  
 
+
'''Level 1'''
'''Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.'''
+
| colspan="2" |'''Level  1'''
{| class="wikitable"
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level  3'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Level  5'''
 +
|-
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |1.  Describes basic levels  of systems of care (self-management to societal)
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Describes systems of care within residency training program
  
 +
2.  Lists potential impediments to safe and efficient handovers of care  within and between systems
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Identifies impediments  to safe and efficient referrals within and between systems
  
Anything especially good?
+
2.  Manages routine  handovers safely
|
+
| colspan="3" |1.  Proposes solutions to  impediments to safe and efficient transitions of care within and between  systems
  
 
+
2.  Manages complex  handovers of care within and between systems
Suggestions for development:
+
| colspan="2" |1.  Leads systems change  at micro and macro level
  
  
  
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |Agreed action:
+
|
 
+
|
 
+
| colspan="2" |
|}
+
|
              
+
| colspan="2" |
 
+
|
'''Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee:'''
+
| colspan="2" |
 
+
|
===== Clinical Rating Scale CRS3 (Outcome CA3: EXTERNAL EYE EXAMINATION) =====
+
| colspan="2" |
 
+
|
 
 
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 
 
 
'''Clinical Rating Scale CR3 (Outcome CA3''': '''External Eye Examination)'''
 
 
 
All trainees must be able to perform an examination of the external eye, ocular adnexae, eyelids and orbits using appropriate equipment and illumination. They must be able to modify the examination and utilise other techniques as indicated by the clinical findings.
 
 
 
 
 
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                 Date (dd/mm/yyyy)       
 
 
 
YEAR 1                                YEAR 2                   YEAR 3            YEAR 4             Other (specify)
 
 
 
Assessor's name                                                                                         Type of assessment: Formative         Summative                                                              
 
 
 
Assessor's status           Consultant                       Senior Trainee                   Other (Specify)
 
 
 
Brief description of case                                       
 
 
 
 
 
'''Please grade the following areas using the scale below''' (use tick or cross)
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Attitude and manner'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' introduce themselves and establish the name  of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer). Their  demeanour throughout shows that they are attentive to the patient by  gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They clearly  explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out.
+
| colspan="14" |Comments:           
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' fail to introduce themselves and do not  identify the patient.  They appear to  hurry or ignore what the patient is saying.  They do not explain the test in an appropriate manner.
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V  Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Introduction and explanation of  examination
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 4,704: Line 5,001:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|-
 
|Rapport with patient, empathy and  sensitivity to age and context
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Respect for patient
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 4,719: Line 5,010:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
 +
'''Assessment Tools''': faculty evaluation, 360 degree/msf 
 +
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="6" |'''External eye examination'''
+
| colspan="15" |'''SBP-2:  Incorporate cost-effectiveness, risk/benefit analysis, and IT to promote safe  and effective patient care'''
 +
 
 +
'''COECSA  ML11'''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' carry out a thorough inspection of the patient and this  efficiently guides the examination.  They examine the patient’s face, lymph nodes and neck and observe,  palpate and auscultate the orbit as indicated.  They examine the lacrimal gland, sac,  canaliculi and puncta. They examine static and dynamic lid position and make  accurate and surgically relevant measurements (e.g. Bells, corneal  sensation).  They identify any  abnormalities of the lashes and meibomian glands. They examine the bulbar,  tarsal and forniceal conjunctiva and the cornea, in particular identifying  abnormalities thereof secondary to lid abnormalities.
+
|'''Has not'''
 +
 
 +
'''Achieved'''
  
'''Poor trainees''' examine the external eye in an ill-structured and inefficient  way and without adequate illumination.  They restrict their examination to the eyelids, even when the clinical  condition suggests an examination of wider facial or ocular structures. They  are unable to assess lid position accurately.  They fail to examine all of the conjunctiva and the lacrimal system,  or the cornea. They do not assess the orbital margin.  They fail to recognise important  abnormalities of the external eye.
+
'''Level 1'''
|-
+
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
|
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level  2'''
|'''Poor'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
|'''Fair'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 4'''
|'''Good'''
+
| colspan="3" |'''Level 5'''
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
|Assessment of face/head
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |1.  Describes scenarios in which physician may  affect cost-effectiveness in patient care
 +
 +
 +
2.  Explains the role of the Electronic Health  Record (EHR) in prevention of medical errors
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Describes cost-effectiveness in patient  care
 +
 +
2.  Aware of cost options for most frequently  ordered tests and medications
 +
 +
3.  Utilizes where available the Electronic  Health Record (EHR) to order tests and medications, document notes; 3.  Demonstrate medication reconciliation for  patients
 +
 +
4.  Uses information systems for patient care
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Almost always practices cost-effective care
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Consistently practices cost-effective care
 +
 +
 +
2.  Applies risk-benefit analyses in ophthalmic  care
 +
 +
 +
3.  Contributes to reduction of risks of  automation and computerized systems by reporting system problems
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Advocates for  cost-effective care and use of risk-benefit analyses within health care  system
 +
 +
 +
2.  Recommends systems re-design for faulty  computerized processes
 
|-
 
|-
|Palpation of orbital margins
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
|-
+
| colspan="2" |
|Examination of lacrimal system
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Assessment of lid position with appropriate measurements
+
| colspan="15" |Comments:           
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Examination of lashes
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
|Examination of meibomian glands
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 4,774: Line 5,079:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|-
 
|Examination of conjunctiva
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 4,781: Line 5,084:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|-
 
|Examination of cornea
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 4,789: Line 5,090:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
 +
'''Assessment Tools''': faculty evaluation
  
  
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 
  
'''Clinical Rating Scale CR3 (Outcome CA3''': '''External Eye Examination)'''
+
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="14" |'''SBP-3: Work in inter-professional  teams to enhance patient safety, identify system errors and implement  solutions'''  
  
All trainees must be able to perform an examination of the external eye, ocular adnexae, eyelids and orbits using appropriate equipment and illumination. They must be able to modify the examination and utilise other techniques as indicated by the clinical findings.
+
'''COECSA ML2, ML4,'''  
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Use of ancillary tests'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' use these techniques skilfully and without prompting.  They recognise the limits of normality and  correctly interpret their findings.
+
|'''Has not'''
 +
 
 +
'''Achieved'''
  
'''Poor trainees''' require prompting to use these techniques.  They have a poor method and fail to recognise normal and abnormal findings.
+
'''Level 1'''
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Level 1'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level 2'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level 3'''
 +
| colspan="3" |'''Level  4'''
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Level 5'''
 
|-
 
|-
|  
+
|
|'''Poor'''
+
| colspan="2" |1.  Describes epidemiology  of medical errors and differences between medical errors, near misses, and  sentinel events
|'''Fair'''
+
 
|'''Good'''
+
2.  Describes role of  teamwork and communication failure in healthcare as a leading cause of  preventable patient harm
|'''V Good'''
+
| colspan="3" |1.  Reports problematic  processes including errors and near misses to supervisor
|'''n/a'''
+
 
 +
2.  Describes use of checklists  and briefings to prevent adverse events in healthcare
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Analyses causes of  adverse events through root cause analysis (RCA)
 +
 
 +
2.  Applies  checklist-guided briefings in healthcare activities
 +
 
 +
3. Can function as the leader of the team when called upon.
 +
| colspan="3" |1.  Develops content for  and facilitate patient safety M&M presentation or conference focusing on  systems-based errors in patient care
 +
 
 +
2.  Analyses shared team experience (e.g. procedure) with debriefing to solve problems
 +
 
 +
3. Can function as the leader of the team when called upon.
 +
| colspan="2" |1.  Designs checklists for  use in healthcare
 +
 
 +
2.  Creates curriculum to  teach teamwork and communication skills to healthcare professionals
 
|-
 
|-
|Lid eversion
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 +
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Exophthalmometer
+
| colspan="14" |Comments:           
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|-
 
|Other (please specify)
 
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|'''Overall performance in this  assessment'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V  Good'''
 
|-
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 4,842: Line 5,159:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
''' '''
+
'''Assessment Tools''': faculty evaluation
  
'''Summative Outcome ('''Delete as appropriate if tool used for summative assessments)'''                             Pass/Fail'''
+
===='''''WORKPLACE BASED ASSESSMENTS'''''====
  
''' '''
+
===== Clinical Rating Scale =====
 
 
''(Note: "Pass" requires an overall assessment grade of "Good" and '''NO''' individual "Poor" grades.)''
 
 
 
 
 
'''Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.'''
 
 
 
              
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
|
+
|'''CRS'''
 
+
| colspan="2" |'''Learning Outcome'''
 
+
|'''Target Year (TYA)<sup>#</sup>'''
Anything especially good?
+
|'''Assessor*'''
|
+
|-
 
+
|CRS1
 
+
|CA1
Suggestions for development:
+
|Consultation
 
+
|1 annual review
 
+
|Cons
 
+
|-
 
+
|CRS2
 +
|CA2
 +
|Vision
 +
|1
 +
|Cons/AHP
 +
|-
 +
|CRS3
 +
|CA3
 +
|Fields
 +
|1
 +
|Cons
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |
+
|CRS4
 
+
|CA4
 
+
|External eye
Agreed action:
+
|1
 
+
|Cons
 
+
|-
 
+
|CRS5
|}
+
|CA5
              
+
|Pupil
 
+
|1
 
+
|Cons
'''Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee:''' 5.2.1.4 Clinical Rating Scale CR4 (Outcome CA4: EXAMINATION OF PUPILS)
+
|-
 
+
|CRS6
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
+
|CA6
 
+
|Ocular motility
'''Clinical Rating Scale CR4 (Outcome CA4''': '''Examination of Pupils)'''
+
|2
 
+
|Cons
All trainees must be able to assess the pupil for abnormalities of shape, size and reactions and interpret their findings.  They must also be able to perform and interpret appropriate pharmacological tests for specific pupil abnormalities.
+
|-
 
+
|CRS7
                                              
+
|CA7
 +
|IOP
 +
|1
 +
|Cons/AHP
 +
|-
 +
|CRS8
 +
|CA8
 +
|Slit lamp
 +
|1
 +
|Cons
 +
|-
 +
|CRS9a, CRS9b
 +
 
 +
CRS9c,  CRS9d
 +
|CA9
 +
|Fundus
 +
|2
 +
|Cons
 +
|-
 +
|CRSret
 +
|PS2
 +
|Retinoscopy (Paed)
 +
|3
 +
|Cons/Optometrist
 +
|}
 +
<nowiki>*</nowiki> Assessors:
 +
 
 +
* Cons: consultant ophthalmologist
 +
* AHP: appropriately trained allied health professional (nurse, orthoptist,    optometrist)
 +
 
 +
====== Clinical Rating Scale CRS1 (Outcome CA1: CLINICAL HISTORY) ======
 +
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 +
 
 +
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRS1      (Outcome CA1-Clinical History)'''  
 +
 
 +
All trainees must be able to take a clinical history from a patient, which is appropriate for the clinical problem and the individual patient’s needs.
 +
 
  
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                          Date (dd/mm/yyyy)                 
+
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                                       Date (dd/mm/yyyy)            
  
YEAR 1                                YEAR 2                   YEAR 3            YEAR 4             Other (specify)
+
YEAR 1                                       YEAR 2                           YEAR 3                    YEAR 4          Other (specify)
  
Assessor's name                                                                                         Type of assessment: Formative          Summative                                                                
+
Assessor's name                                                                                          Type of assessment:  Formative        Summative                                                                
  
Assessor's status           Consultant                       Senior Trainee                    Other (Specify)
 
  
Brief description of case:
+
Assessor's status           Consultant                       Senior Trainee              Other (Specify)
  
 +
Brief description of case                                       
  
 
'''Please grade the following areas using the scale below''' (use tick or cross)
 
'''Please grade the following areas using the scale below''' (use tick or cross)
Line 4,904: Line 5,260:
 
| colspan="6" |'''Attitude and manner'''
 
| colspan="6" |'''Attitude and manner'''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' introduce themselves and establish the name  of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer). Their  demeanour throughout shows that they are attentive to the patient by gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They clearly  explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out.
+
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' introduce themselves and establish the name  of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer). Their  demeanour throughout the interview shows that they are actively listening to the patient by gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They establish a good rapport with the patient which is respectful of any  ethnic, religious or social preferences that they express. They are empathic  and sensitive to the patient’s concerns.
  
'''Poor trainees''' fail to introduce themselves and do not  identify the patient.  They appear to  hurry or ignore what the patient is saying.  They do not explain the test in an appropriate manner.
+
'''Poor trainees''' neither introduce themselves nor identify the patient.  They hurry the patient and ignore what the patient is saying.  They look away or  appear impatient during the history takingThere are unable to establish rapport with the patient and show  little respect.
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
Line 4,912: Line 5,268:
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''Good'''
|'''V Good'''
+
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|-
|Introduction and explanation of  examination
+
|Introduction and start of interview
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|Rapport with patient and development of trust
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|Listening skills, appropriate eye contact and non-verbal communication
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 4,922: Line 5,292:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Rapport with patient, empathy and sensitivity to age and context
+
|Empathy and sensitivity
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 4,937: Line 5,307:
 
|}
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="6" |'''Examination of the pupils'''
+
| colspan="6" |'''Information gathering'''
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' capture all of the appropriate information  required for the ophthalmic examination and diagnosis, the planning of  investigations and subsequent management. Their questions are structured and  guided by the differential diagnosis suggested by the presenting complaint.
  
'''V good trainees''' examine the patient in low ambient light and record the pupil  size, position, shape and symmetry.  They ensure that the subject fixates on a distance target.  They use a bright focussed light to examine  the direct and the consensual reaction in each eye, noting the extent, speed  and recovery of the reaction.  They  then progress to the swinging flashlight test (SFT), dwelling on each eye for  a second or two and moving the  light swiftly across to the other pupil.  They  correctly interpret the results of a SFT even when one pupil is dilated or  obscured.  They test the accommodative  reaction using an appropriate target and instruction.  They ask to view the pupils on the slit  lamp.  They are familiar with  pharmacological tests for abnormal pupil reactions. They suggest an  appropriate cause for any abnormalities observed. 
+
'''Poor trainees''' ask questions by rote.  They omit important areas.  They  do not pursue an appropriate line of questioning informed by a differential diagnosis.
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' examine the pupils in an ill-structured and inefficient way  with inappropriate illumination.  They  fail to ensure that the subject fixates on a distance target and get in the  way of the subject’s direction of gaze.  They allow the test light to spill into the non-tested eye.  They forget to record the size, shape and  position of the pupils.  They perform  the SFT with a slow arc under the nose from one eye to the other.  They are unable to comment on pupil  reactions if one pupil is dilated or obscured.  They elicit the accommodative reaction by  rapidly approaching the eyes with one finger and are unaware of the threat  response.  They exhibit confusion about  the theory and practice of pharmacological tests. They forget to view the  pupils on the slit lamp. They are unable to interpret the results of the test.
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
Line 4,947: Line 5,317:
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''Good'''
|'''V Good'''
+
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|-
|General inspection in ambient light  with measurements
+
|History of presenting complaint
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 4,957: Line 5,327:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Appropriate use of distance target
+
|Past ophthalmic history
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 4,964: Line 5,334:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Direct pupillary reaction and  recovery
+
|Family history
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 4,971: Line 5,341:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Consensual reaction and recovery
+
|Past medical history/general health
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 4,978: Line 5,348:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Swinging flashlight test
+
|Systems enquiry
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 4,985: Line 5,355:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Accommodative reaction and recovery
+
|Drug history and allergies
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 4,992: Line 5,362:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Slit lamp examination
+
|Social history
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 4,999: Line 5,369:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Correct reactions identified
+
|Other relevant enquiries pertinent to case
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,006: Line 5,376:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Suggestion of suitable aetiology
+
|Assessment of mental state
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,012: Line 5,382:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 +
|}
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="6" |'''Awareness'''
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' are attentive the patient’s anxiety and  main concerns.  They are sensitive to  the social impact of the patient’s problems.  They adapt the interview appropriately as determined by the patient’s  age, mental state and any communication problems such as poor hearing or  language barriers.
 +
 +
'''Poor trainees''' disregard the patient’s main concerns or anxieties and any  impact their problem may have on their social circumstances. They are  insensitive to the potential barriers to good communication raised by  extremes of age, mental state, hearing impairment or language.
 
|-
 
|-
|Suggestions for suitable further  tests
 
 
|
 
|
|
+
|'''Poor'''
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 
 
 
'''Clinical Rating Scale CR4 (Outcome CA4''': '''Examination of Pupils)'''
 
 
 
All trainees must be able to assess the pupil for abnormalities of shape, size and reactions and interpret their findings.  They must also be able to perform and interpret appropriate pharmacological tests for specific pupil abnormalities
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|'''Overall performance in this  assessment'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''Good'''
|'''V Good'''
+
|'''V Good'''
 +
|'''n/a'''
 +
|-
 +
|Sensitive and responsive to patient anxieties and concerns
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|Aware of the social impact of problems for patient
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|Interview sensitive and responsive to age of patient, mental  state and any communication problems
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,039: Line 5,418:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
 
 
 
'''Summative Outcome ('''Delete as appropriate if tool used for summative assessments)'''                             Pass/Fail'''
 
 
''' '''
 
 
''(Note: "Pass" requires an overall assessment grade of "Good" and '''NO''' individual "Poor" grades.)''
 
 
''' '''
 
 
 
'''Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.'''
 
 
              
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
|
+
| colspan="6" |'''Management of interview'''
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' are skilled in questioning with an  appropriate mixture of open and closed questions.  They clarify what they have understood and  check this with the patient by appropriate summaries. They use the time  efficiently and guide the patient with sensitivity. They explain terms  appropriately and finish the interview effectively, making future plans  clear.
  
 
+
'''Poor trainees''' ask closed questions which do not encourage the patient to tell  her/his story. They do not clarify points or attempt to summarise.  They waste time through repetition or  inappropriate questioning. They do not guide the patient appropriately.  Information if provided at all unclear or  too technical.  They do not make it  clear when the interview has come to an end or what the next step is.
Anything especially good?
+
|-
 
|
 
|
 
+
|'''Poor'''
 
+
|'''Fair'''
Suggestions for development:
+
|'''Good'''
 
+
|'''V Good'''
 
+
|'''n/a'''
 
 
 
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |
+
|Mode of enquiry: appropriate use of closed, open, directed and probing questionsClarification and summarising.  
 
+
|
 
+
|
Agreed action:
+
|
 
+
|
 
+
|
 
 
|}
 
              
 
 
 
 
 
'''Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee:'''
 
 
 
 
 
           5.2.1.5 Clinical Rating Scale CRS5 (Outcome CA5: OculaR MOTILITY)
 
 
 
                                              
 
 
 
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 
 
 
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRS5 (Outcome CA5''': '''Cover Test and Ocular Motility)'''
 
 
 
All trainees must be able to perform a cover test, assess ocular movements and interpret the findings. They must be able perform a prism cover testThey must also be able to recognise and describe nystagmus if present.
 
 
 
 
 
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                               Date (dd/mm/yyyy)                 
 
 
 
YEAR 1                                YEAR 2                   YEAR 3            YEAR 4             Other (specify)
 
 
 
Assessor's name                                                                                         Type of assessment:  Formative        Summative                                                              
 
 
 
Assessor's status           Consultant                       Senior Trainee                     Other (Specify)
 
 
 
Brief description of case                                       
 
 
 
 
 
'''Please grade the following areas using the scale below''' (use tick or cross)
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Attitude and manner'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' introduce themselves and establish the name  of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer). Their  demeanour throughout shows that they are attentive to the patient by  gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They clearly  explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out.
+
|Appropriate control and direction
 
+
|
'''Poor trainees''' fail to introduce themselves and do not  identify the patient.  They appear to  hurry or ignore what the patient is saying.  They do not explain the test in an appropriate manner.
+
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 
|-
 
|-
|  
+
|Efficient use of time
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V  Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Introduction and explanation of examination
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,126: Line 5,453:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Rapport with patient, empathy and  sensitivity to age and context
+
|Delivery of information
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,133: Line 5,460:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Respect for patient
+
|Termination of interview
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,141: Line 5,468:
 
|}
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="6" |'''Cover test and eye movements'''
+
|'''Overall performance in this assessment'''
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' comment on corneal reflexes and any abnormal head posture, ptosis, pupils etc. They use suitable near and distance fixation targets.  They perform cover-uncover and alternate cover tests purposefully without  excessive repetition and identify abnormalities accurately. Their  instructions to the patient are clear and unambiguous throughout. The  examination flows easily and appropriate versions, ductions, vergences and  saccade checks are performed in response to findings.
 
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' fail to perform a general inspection of the patient. Their  instructions to the patient are ambiguous and confusing so that the patient  is unclear what is expected of them. They perform the tests clumsily, without  an obvious plan and important steps are missed. They miss and/or fail to  interpret important clinical signs.
 
|-
 
|
 
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V  Good'''
 
|'''V  Good'''
|'''n/a'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
|Observation of associated ocular  signs and head position
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,160: Line 5,479:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|-
+
|}
|Use of fixation targets
+
'''Summative Outcome ('''Delete as appropriate if tool used for summative assessments)'''                             Pass/Fail'''
 +
''Pass/Fail = Meets expectation /Does not meet expectation for stage of training''
 +
''' '''
 +
 
 +
''(Note: "Pass" requires an overall assessment grade of "Good" and '''NO''' individual "Poor" grades''
 +
 
 +
 
 +
'''Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.'''
 +
 
 +
              
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 
|
 
|
 +
 +
 +
Anything especially good?
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 
|
 
|
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Performance of cover, cover-uncover  test and alternate cover test.
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Assessment of versions, ductions,  vergences, saccades
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Interpretation of findings
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
  
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 
  
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRS5 (Outcome CA5''': '''Cover Test and Ocular Motility)'''
+
Suggestions for development:
  
All trainees must be able to perform a cover test, assess ocular movements and interpret the findings. They must be able perform a prism cover test.  They must also be able to recognise and describe nystagmus if present.
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Prism cover test'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' give clear instructions to the patient. They perform the test  at near and distance and with/without glasses or head posture if appropriate.  They hold the prism bar at a comfortable and effective distance with prisms  aligned in the correct position for the deviation. They perform an alternate  cover test with increasing prism strength until the deviation is reversed.  They interpret the test accurately.
 
  
'''Poor trainees''' leave the patient unclear what is expected of them. They are unfamiliar with the prism bar. They miss important steps and they fail to  assess the angle with acceptable accuracy.
+
 
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="2" |
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Agreed action:
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
|}
 +
              
 +
 
 +
 
 +
'''Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee:'''
 +
 
 +
====== Clinical Rating Scale CRS2 (Outcome CA2: ASSESS Vision) ======
 +
 
 +
 
 +
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 +
 
 +
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRS2 (Outcome CA2: Assess Vision)'''
 +
 
 +
All trainees must be able to assess visual acuity for near and distance using an appropriate method and interpret the results. They must be aware of and be able to interpret and apply newer methods of assessing visual acuity when they are introduced into clinical practice. They must be able to test colour vision using an appropriate method and interpret the results. They should also know the principles of the assessment of contrast sensitivity. They must be able to assess vision in children and in adults who have language and other barriers to communication. They must be able to assess vision in circumstances outside the OPD environment.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                                Date (dd/mm/yyyy)                     
 +
 
 +
YEAR 1                                YEAR 2                   YEAR 3            YEAR 4             Other (specify)
 +
 
 +
Assessor's name                                                                                             Type of assessment:  Formative           Summative                                                                
 +
 
 +
Assessor's status           Consultant                       Senior Trainee                    Other (Specify)
 +
 
 +
Brief description of case                                       
 +
 
 +
 
 +
'''Please grade the following areas using the scale below''' (use tick or cross)
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="6" |'''Attitude and manner'''
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' introduce themselves and establish the name  of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer). Their  demeanour throughout shows that they are attentive to the patient by  gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They explain  the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out.
 +
 
 +
'''Poor trainees''' neither introduce themselves nor identify the patient.  They hurry the patient  and ignore what the patient is saying.  They do not explain the test in an appropriate manner.
 
|-
 
|-
 
|  
 
|  
Line 5,206: Line 5,558:
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''Good'''
|'''V Good'''
+
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|-
|Explanation of test
+
|Introduction and explanation of test
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,216: Line 5,568:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Appropriate positioning of  prism bar
+
|Rapport with patient, empathy and  sensitivity to age and context
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,223: Line 5,575:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Assessment of angle
+
|Respect for patient
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Interpretation of results
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,238: Line 5,583:
 
|}
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
|'''Overall performance in this assessment'''
+
| colspan="6" |'''Visual acuity Method*: Snellen/LogMar/Sheridan-Gardner/other,  specify'''
 +
 
 +
(* Please circle method as appropriate or specify  “other”…………………………………………….)
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="6" |'''Very good trainees''' occlude each eye in turn to perform  the test.  They use an appropriate form of visual acuity assessment determined by the patient’s age and level of  understanding.  They can compare  results from different tests.  They use  appropriate refractive correction and instruct the patient on the best use of  a pinhole. They record the visual acuity correctly.
 +
 
 +
'''Poor trainees''' do not occlude appropriately.  They do not use an appropriate test  method.  They do not understand the  equivalence of results from different tests.  They do not use an appropriate method of correcting refractive error.  The visual acuity is recorded inaccurately or incorrectly.
 +
|-
 +
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''Good'''
|'''V Good'''
+
|'''V Good'''
 +
|'''n/a'''
 +
|-
 +
|Appropriate occlusion
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|Technique of assessment appropriate for age and context
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|Appropriate use of refractive correction
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|Appropriate use of pinhole
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|Accurate recording of distance acuity
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|Accurate recording of near acuity
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,250: Line 5,640:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
'''Summative Outcome ('''Delete as appropriate if tool used for summative assessments)'''                             Pass/Fail'''
+
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
  
''' '''
+
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRS2 (Outcome CA2: Assess Vision)'''
 
 
''(Note: "Pass" requires an overall assessment grade of "Good" and '''NO''' individual "Poor" grades.)''
 
 
 
''' '''
 
  
 +
All trainees must be able to assess visual acuity for near and distance using an appropriate method and interpret the results. They must be aware of and be able to interpret and apply newer methods of assessing visual acuity when they are introduced into clinical practice. They must be able to test colour vision using an appropriate method and interpret the results. They should also know the principles of the assessment of contrast sensitivity. They must be able to assess vision in children and in adults who have language and other barriers to communication. They must be able to assess vision in circumstances outside the OPD environment.
  
'''Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.'''
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
|              
+
| colspan="6" |'''Colour vision (Method: Ishihara/other  pseudoisochromatic/other)'''
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' occlude each eye in turn to perform the  test.  They use an appropriate form of  colour vision assessment determined by the patient’s age and level of  understanding.  They can compare  results from different tests. They record the results of the colour vision  test correctly and know how to interpret them.
  
Anything especially good?
+
'''Poor trainees''' do not occlude appropriately.  They do not choose an appropriate test  method.  They do not understand the equivalence of results from different testsThe colour vision is recorded inaccurately or incorrectly.  They do not understand  the implications of the result.
|
+
|-
 
+
|  
 
 
Suggestions for development:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
|-
 
| colspan="2" |
 
 
 
 
 
Agreed action:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
|}
 
              
 
 
 
'''Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee:'''  
 
 
 
5.2.1.6 Clinical Rating Scale CRS6 (Outcome CA6: IOP MeASUREMENT)
 
 
 
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 
 
 
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRS6 (CA6''': '''IOP Measurement)'''
 
 
 
All trainees must be able to measure the intraocular pressure accurately using a variety of applanation techniques and understand the limits of each.  They must be able to check the calibration of the tonometer.
 
 
 
 
 
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                                                         Date (dd/mm/yyyy)          
 
 
 
YEAR1                                        YEAR 2                            YEAR 3                                    YEAR 4                                   Other (specify)
 
 
 
Assessor's name:
 
 
 
 
 
Assessor's status:         Consultant                                               AHP                           Other (Specify)
 
 
 
 
 
Brief description of case(s)                                  
 
 
 
'''Please grade the following areas using the scale below''' (use tick or cross)
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Attitude and manner'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' introduce themselves and  establish the identity of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse,  parent, carer). Their demeanour throughout shows that they are attentive to  the patient by gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact.  They clearly explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried outThey ensure that the patient is comfortable and that adequate privacy is maintained.
 
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' fail to introduce  themselves and do not identify the patient.  They appear to hurry or ignore what the patient is saying.  They do not explain the test in an  appropriate manner.  They pay little or  no attention to confirmation of patient comfort or privacy.
 
|-
 
|
 
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Fair'''
Line 5,321: Line 5,660:
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|-
|Introduction and explanation  of examination
+
|Appropriate occlusion
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|Technique of assessment appropriate for age and context
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,328: Line 5,674:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Rapport with patient,  empathy and sensitivity to age and context
+
|Appropriate use of colour vision test
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,335: Line 5,681:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Respect for patient and  their comfort
+
|Accurate recording of colour vision
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,342: Line 5,688:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="6" |'''IOP measurement (Technique: Goldmann/Tonopen/Perkins/other)'''
+
|'''Overall performance in this assessment'''
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' ensure adequate disinfection of the tonometer before and after use.  They insert appropriate amounts of appropriate drops, avoid contact of the  tonometer with lids or lashes and complete the measurement swiftly without  prolonged contact between tonometer and cornea. They achieve a reading  accurate to within 2 mm Hg of the assessor’s reading. They are conversant  with all types of IOP measurement methods and the advantages and  disadvantages of each.
 
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' have to be prompted to ensure disinfection of the tonometer tip  before and after use.  They insert  inappropriate quantities of anaesthetic drops or use inappropriate  drops.  They push roughly on the patient’s  eye and lids and touch the tonometer on the lids.  They have difficulty achieving a reading,  requiring several attempts, and fail to achieve accuracy to within 2 mm  Hg.  They frequently cause trauma to  the corneal epithelium. They are not fully aware of all types of measurement  methods or their advantages and disadvantages.
 
|-
 
|
 
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''Good'''
|'''V Good'''
+
|'''V Good'''
|'''n/a'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
|Consent for test
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,364: Line 5,700:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|-
+
|}
|Application of anaesthesia and fluorescein
+
'''Summative Outcome ('''Delete as appropriate if tool used for summative assessments)'''                             Pass/Fail '''
|
+
 
|
+
''(Note: "Pass" requires an overall assessment grade of "Good" and '''NO''' individual "Poor" grades.)''''' '''
|
+
 
 +
 
 +
'''Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.'''
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 
|
 
|
 +
 +
 +
Anything especially good?
 
|
 
|
 +
 +
 +
Suggestions for development:
 +
 +
 +
 
|-
 
|-
|Stabilisation of lids and eye
+
| colspan="2" |Agreed action:
|
+
 
|
+
 
|
+
|}
|
+
              
|
+
 
|-
+
'''Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee:'''
|Use of tonometer.  Accurate placement on eye
+
 
|
+
====== Clinical Rating Scale CRS3 (Outcome CA3: EXTERNAL EYE EXAMINATION) ======
|
+
 
|
+
 
|
+
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
|
+
 
|-
+
'''Clinical Rating Scale CR3 (Outcome CA3''': '''External Eye Examination)'''
|Accurate IOP recording.  Accurate to within 2mm Hg
+
 
|
+
All trainees must be able to perform an examination of the external eye, ocular adnexae, eyelids and orbits using appropriate equipment and illumination. They must be able to modify the examination and utilise other techniques as indicated by the clinical findings.
|
+
 
|
+
 
|
+
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                 Date (dd/mm/yyyy)       
|
+
 
 +
YEAR 1                                YEAR 2                   YEAR 3            YEAR 4             Other (specify)
 +
 
 +
Assessor's name                                                                                         Type of assessment: Formative         Summative                                                              
 +
 
 +
Assessor's status           Consultant                       Senior Trainee                   Other (Specify)
 +
 
 +
Brief description of case                                       
 +
 
 +
 
 +
'''Please grade the following areas using the scale below''' (use tick or cross)
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="6" |'''Attitude and manner'''
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' introduce themselves and establish the name of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer). Their  demeanour throughout shows that they are attentive to the patient by  gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They clearly  explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out.
 +
 
 +
'''Poor trainees''' fail to introduce themselves and do not  identify the patient.  They appear to  hurry or ignore what the patient is saying.  They do not explain the test in an appropriate manner.
 
|-
 
|-
|Interpretation of result
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
 
|
 
|
 +
|'''Poor'''
 +
|'''Fair'''
 +
|'''Good'''
 +
|'''V  Good'''
 +
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|-
|Corneal appearance after examination
+
|Introduction and explanation of examination
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,407: Line 5,771:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Care of tonometer head
+
|Rapport with patient, empathy and  sensitivity to age and context
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,414: Line 5,778:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Infection control
+
|Respect for patient
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,420: Line 5,784:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|}  
+
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="6" |'''Checking  calibration of tonometer'''
+
| colspan="6" |'''External eye examination'''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' know how to use the calibration arm and what to do if the reading is inaccurate.
+
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' carry out a thorough inspection of the patient and this  efficiently guides the examination.  They examine the patient’s face, lymph nodes and neck and observe,  palpate and auscultate the orbit as indicated.  They examine the lacrimal gland, sac,  canaliculi and puncta. They examine static and dynamic lid position and make  accurate and surgically relevant measurements (e.g. Bells, corneal  sensation).  They identify any  abnormalities of the lashes and meibomian glands. They examine the bulbar,  tarsal and forniceal conjunctiva and the cornea, in particular identifying abnormalities thereof secondary to lid abnormalities.
  
'''Poor trainees''' do not know what to do with the calibration arm and do not know what an inaccurate reading is, or what to do about it.
+
'''Poor trainees''' examine the external eye in an ill-structured and inefficient  way and without adequate illumination.  They restrict their examination to the eyelids, even when the clinical condition suggests an examination of wider facial or ocular structures. They  are unable to assess lid position accurately.  They fail to examine all of the conjunctiva and the lacrimal system, or the cornea. They do not assess the orbital margin.  They fail to recognise important  abnormalities of the external eye.
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|  
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''Good'''
|'''V Good'''
+
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|-
|Knowledge of reasons for calibration
+
|Assessment of face/head
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,442: Line 5,806:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Appropriate use of calibration arm
+
|Palpation of orbital margins
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,449: Line 5,813:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Interpretation of results
+
|Examination of lacrimal system
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,456: Line 5,820:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Appropriate action taken
+
|Assessment of lid position with  appropriate measurements
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,462: Line 5,826:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|'''Overall performance in this assessment'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|Examination of lashes
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,475: Line 5,833:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|}
 
 
 
'''Outcome''' (Delete as appropriate) '''                             Pass/Fail'''
 
 
'''''NB The following boxes MUST be completed:'''''
 
 
              
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|
 
 
 
Please note any aspects which were especially  good:
 
 
|-
 
|-
|Please note any  suggestions for improvement and action points:
+
|Examination of meibomian glands
|}
 
              
 
 
 
 
 
'''Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee:''' 
 
 
 
5.2.1.7 Clinical Rating scale CRS7 (CA7: Use of Slit Lamp)
 
 
 
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 
 
 
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRS7 (CA7: Use of Slit Lamp)'''
 
 
 
All trainees must be able to examine the eye and adjacent structures using the slit lamp and interpret their findings. They must be able to employ all of the functions of the slit lamp and use accessory equipment when indicated. They must know how to care for the equipment properly and prevent cross infection.
 
 
 
                                                                                              
 
 
 
Trainee’s Nam                                                                                                                                                        Date (dd/mm/yyyy)              
 
 
 
YEAR 1                                YEAR 2                   YEAR 3            YEAR 4             Other (specify)
 
 
 
Assessor's name                                                                                          Type of assessment:  Formative          Summative                                                                
 
 
 
Assessor's status           Consultant                       Senior Trainee                    Other (Specify)
 
 
 
Brief description of case                                       
 
 
 
                                              
 
 
 
 
 
'''Please grade the following areas using the scale below''' (use tick or cross)
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Attitude and manner'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' introduce themselves and establish the name  of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer). Their  demeanour throughout shows that they are attentive to the patient by  gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They clearly  explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out.
 
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' fail to introduce themselves and do not  identify the patient.  They appear to  hurry or ignore what the patient is saying.  They do not explain the test in an appropriate manner.
 
|-
 
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Introduction and explanation of  examination
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,541: Line 5,841:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Rapport with patient, empathy and  sensitivity to age and context
+
|Examination of conjunctiva
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,548: Line 5,848:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Respect for patient
+
|Examination of cornea
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,555: Line 5,855:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
{| class="wikitable"
+
 
| colspan="6" |'''Knowledge of slit lamp'''
+
 
 +
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 +
 
 +
'''Clinical Rating Scale CR3 (Outcome CA3''': '''External Eye Examination)'''
 +
 
 +
All trainees must be able to perform an examination of the external eye, ocular adnexae, eyelids and orbits using appropriate equipment and illumination. They must be able to modify the examination and utilise other techniques as indicated by the clinical findings.
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="6" |'''Use of ancillary tests'''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' set up the slit lamp properly in advance of  conducting the examination. They appropriately set the IPD and focus of each  eyepiece, and have a good knowledge of all the slit lamp functions and  techniques of illumination to achieve the optimum view of the part of the eye  being examined. They know what adjustments to make to view different areas of  the anterior and posterior segment. They are aware of appropriate care and  maintenance of the slit lamp.
+
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' use these techniques skilfully and without prompting.  They recognise the limits of normality and  correctly interpret their findings.
  
'''Poor trainees''' fail to set up the slit lamp properly. Their  examination technique is slip shod and halting and they make constant aimless  readjustments. They appear unaware of the best slit lamp settings to optimise the examination of different parts of the anterior and posterior  segments. 
+
'''Poor trainees''' require prompting to use these techniques.  They have a poor method and fail to  recognise normal and abnormal findings.
 
|-
 
|-
 
|  
 
|  
Line 5,566: Line 5,873:
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''Good'''
|'''V Good'''
+
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|-
|Appropriate IPD
+
|Lid eversion
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,576: Line 5,883:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Appropriate eyepiece focus
+
|Exophthalmometer
|
 
|
 
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Appropriate selection of slit beam  size and angle
+
|Other (please specify)
|
 
|
 
 
|
 
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 +
|}
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|'''Overall performance in this  assessment'''
 +
|'''Poor'''
 +
|'''Fair'''
 +
|'''Good'''
 +
|'''V  Good'''
 
|-
 
|-
|Use of full range of available  magnification powers
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,596: Line 5,907:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|-
+
|}
|Use of appropriate filters
+
''' '''
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
  
'''Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee:'''
+
'''Summative Outcome ('''Delete as appropriate if tool used for summative assessments)'''                             Pass/Fail'''
  
 +
''' '''
  
 +
''(Note: "Pass" requires an overall assessment grade of "Good" and '''NO''' individual "Poor" grades.)''
  
5.2.1.8 Clinical Rating scale CRS8 (CA8: Fundus Examination – Direct opthalmoscope)
 
  
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
+
'''Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.'''
  
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRS8 (CA8: Fundus Examination)'''
+
              
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|
  
All trainees must be able to examine the fundus of the eye using appropriate techniques and interpret their findings. They must be able to use the direct and indirect ophthalmoscopes. They must be able to use a variety of lenses for binocular fundus examination with the slit lamp. They must be able to use appropriate indentation techniques.
 
  
                              
+
Anything especially good?
 +
|
  
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                Date (dd/mm/yyyy)                
 
  
YEAR 1                                YEAR 2                   YEAR 3            YEAR 4             Other (specify)
+
Suggestions for development:
  
Assessor's name                                                                                           Type of assessment:  Formative         Summative                                                              
 
  
Assessor's status           Consultant                       Senior Trainee                  Other (Specify)
 
  
Brief description of case                                         
+
 
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="2" |
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Agreed action:
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
|}
 +
              
 +
 
 +
 
 +
'''Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee:'''
 +
 
 +
====== Clinical Rating Scale CR4 (Outcome CA4: EXAMINATION OF PUPILS) ======
 +
 
 +
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 +
 
 +
'''Clinical Rating Scale CR4 (Outcome CA4''': '''Examination of Pupils)'''
 +
 
 +
All trainees must be able to assess the pupil for abnormalities of shape, size and reactions and interpret their findings.  They must also be able to perform and interpret appropriate pharmacological tests for specific pupil abnormalities.
 +
 
 +
                                              
 +
 
 +
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                          Date (dd/mm/yyyy)                 
 +
 
 +
YEAR 1                                YEAR 2                   YEAR 3            YEAR 4             Other (specify)
 +
 
 +
Assessor's name                                                                                         Type of assessment: Formative          Summative                                                              
 +
 
 +
Assessor's status           Consultant                       Senior Trainee                    Other (Specify)
 +
 
 +
Brief description of case:
  
  
Line 5,636: Line 5,974:
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' introduce themselves and establish the name  of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer). Their  demeanour throughout shows that they are attentive to the patient by  gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They clearly  explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out.
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' introduce themselves and establish the name  of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer). Their  demeanour throughout shows that they are attentive to the patient by  gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They clearly  explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out.
  
'''Poor trainees''' fail to introduce themselves and do not identify the patient.  They appear to hurry or ignore what the patient is saying.  They do not explain the test in an appropriate manner.
+
'''Poor trainees''' fail to introduce themselves and do not identify the patient.  They appear to hurry or ignore what the patient is saying.  They do not explain the test in an appropriate manner.
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
Line 5,660: Line 5,998:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Respect for patient
 
|Respect for patient
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Aware of patient’s comfort
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,674: Line 6,005:
 
|}
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="6" |'''Direct ophthalmoscope'''
+
| colspan="6" |'''Examination of the pupils'''
|-
+
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' check the ophthalmoscope before using it. They select the most appropriate colour, shape, size and brightness of light beam at every stage. They always choose the most appropriate correcting lens. They explain the  procedure and show that they understand the discomfort caused by the  brightness of the light. They readily achieve a good view of the central fundus and achieve a view as far peripherally as is feasible. Their technique is efficient and fluent. They will describe their findings accurately.
+
'''V good trainees''' examine the patient in low ambient light and record the pupil size, position, shape and symmetry.   They ensure that the subject fixates on a distance target.  They use a bright focussed light to examine  the direct and the consensual reaction in each eye, noting the extent, speed and recovery of the reaction.  They  then progress to the swinging flashlight test (SFT), dwelling on each eye for a second or two and moving the light swiftly across to the other pupil.  They correctly interpret the results of a SFT even when one pupil is dilated or  obscured.  They test the accommodative reaction using an appropriate target and instruction.  They ask to view the pupils on the slit  lamp.  They are familiar with pharmacological tests for abnormal pupil reactions. They suggest an  appropriate cause for any abnormalities observed. 
  
'''Poor trainees''' launch into the examination without checking the instrument settings. They show no understanding of the uses of the different settingsTheir use of the lenses is haphazard. They are unable to co-ordinate an examination of the peripheral fundus. They fail to understand and empathise with the patient when the patient finds the light uncomfortable. They miss abnormalities altogether and/or fail to describe them.
+
'''Poor trainees''' examine the pupils in an ill-structured and inefficient way with inappropriate illumination.  They fail to ensure that the subject fixates on a distance target and get in the  way of the subject’s direction of gaze.  They allow the test light to spill into the non-tested eye.  They forget to record the size, shape and position of the pupils.  They perform  the SFT with a slow arc under the nose from one eye to the other.  They are unable to comment on pupil  reactions if one pupil is dilated or obscured.  They elicit the accommodative reaction by rapidly approaching the eyes with one finger and are unaware of the threat  response.  They exhibit confusion about the theory and practice of pharmacological tests. They forget to view the pupils on the slit lamp. They are unable to interpret the results of the test.
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
Line 5,687: Line 6,018:
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|-
|Instructions to patient
+
|General inspection in ambient light  with measurements
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,694: Line 6,025:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Familiarity with use of ophthalmoscope
+
|Appropriate use of distance target
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,701: Line 6,032:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Correct use of illumination
+
|Direct pupillary reaction and  recovery
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,708: Line 6,039:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Appropriate use of lenses
+
|Consensual reaction and recovery
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,715: Line 6,046:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Description of findings
+
|Swinging flashlight test
 +
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|
+
|-
|} 
+
|Accommodative reaction and recovery
 
 
5.2.1.9 Clinical Rating scale CRS8 (CA8: Fundus Examination – indirect ophthalmoscope)
 
 
 
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 
 
 
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRS8 (CA8: Fundus Examination)'''
 
 
 
All trainees must be able to examine the fundus of the eye using appropriate techniques and interpret their findings. They must be able to use the direct and indirect ophthalmoscopes. They must be able to use a variety of lenses for binocular fundus examination with the slit lamp. They must be able to use appropriate indentation techniques.
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Indirect ophthalmoscope'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' adjust the equipment appropriately before use, in particular  adjusting the light for optimum viewing. They examine the patient in a  reclined position whenever appropriate and ensure their comfort. They choose  the most appropriate condensing lens and demonstrate an efficient and fluent  technique, holding the lens at the best distance from the eye. When  appropriate they use indentation efficiently and gently. They use the minimum  light necessary for a proper view and empathise with the patient when the  light or the indentation causes discomfort. They describe their findings  accurately.
 
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' struggle to place the ophthalmoscope in position on their head  squarely and securely. They are unable to adjust the light appropriately.  They fail to ensure that the patient is comfortable or appropriately  positioned. They use too much or too little illumination. Their use and  positioning of the lens is haphazard. They are unable to co-ordinate an  examination of the peripheral fundus and are rough with and/or unsuccessful  at indentation. They fail to understand and empathise with the patient when  the patient finds the test uncomfortable. If they manage to achieve a view at  all they miss abnormalities altogether and/or fail to describe them.
 
|-
 
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V  Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Instructions to patient
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,752: Line 6,060:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Familiarity with use of  ophthalmoscope
+
|Slit lamp examination
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,759: Line 6,067:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Correct use of illumination
+
|Correct reactions identified
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,766: Line 6,074:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Appropriate use of lenses
+
|Suggestion of suitable aetiology
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,773: Line 6,081:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Indentation technique
+
|Suggestions for suitable further  tests
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,779: Line 6,087:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 +
|}
 +
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 +
 +
'''Clinical Rating Scale CR4 (Outcome CA4''': '''Examination of Pupils)'''
 +
 +
All trainees must be able to assess the pupil for abnormalities of shape, size and reactions and interpret their findings.  They must also be able to perform and interpret appropriate pharmacological tests for specific pupil abnormalities
 +
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|'''Overall performance in this  assessment'''
 +
|'''Poor'''
 +
|'''Fair'''
 +
|'''Good'''
 +
|'''V  Good'''
 
|-
 
|-
|Description of findings
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,786: Line 6,106:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|}  
+
|}
 +
 
 +
 
 +
'''Summative Outcome ('''Delete as appropriate if tool used for summative assessments)'''                             Pass/Fail'''
 +
 
 +
''' '''
 +
 
 +
''(Note: "Pass" requires an overall assessment grade of "Good" and '''NO''' individual "Poor" grades.)''
 +
 
 +
''' '''
  
5.2.1.10 Clinical Rating scale CRS8 (CA8: Fundus Examination – 78d/90d lens)
 
  
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
+
'''Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.'''
  
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRS8 (CA8: Fundus Examination)'''
+
              
  
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="7" |'''78D/90D lens'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="7" |'''Very good trainees''' set up the slit lamp illumination and eyepieces before commencing the  examination. They help the patient to get into position if necessary. They  warn of the brightness of the light. They select the most appropriate lens  and show expertise in holding it in the correct position and orientation.  They choose the most appropriate colour, size and brightness of light at  every stage and empathise with the patient who has difficulty looking in the  correct direction. Thel have a fluent technique and achieve as good a view of  both central and peripheral retina as is possible. They describe their  findings accurately.
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' rush into the examination without setting the slit lamp properly.  They start with an inappropriately bright light but have to fiddle around to  get it pointing correctly. They show frustration when the patient cannot  place his/her head appropriately or cannot move the eye into the desired  position. They choose an inappropriate lens and/or show difficulty in getting  it positioned correctly. If they manage to achieve a view at all they miss  abnormalities altogether and/or fail to describe them.
 
|-
 
 
|
 
|
|'''Poor'''
+
 
 +
 
 +
Anything especially good?
 +
|
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Suggestions for development:
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="2" |
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Agreed action:
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
|}
 +
              
 +
 
 +
 
 +
'''Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee:'''
 +
 
 +
====== Clinical Rating Scale CRS5 (Outcome CA5: OculaR MOTILITY) ======
 +
                                              
 +
 
 +
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 +
 
 +
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRS5 (Outcome CA5''': '''Cover Test and Ocular Motility)'''
 +
 
 +
All trainees must be able to perform a cover test, assess ocular movements and interpret the findings. They must be able perform a prism cover test.  They must also be able to recognise and describe nystagmus if present.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                               Date (dd/mm/yyyy)                 
 +
 
 +
YEAR 1                                YEAR 2                   YEAR 3            YEAR 4             Other (specify)
 +
 
 +
Assessor's name                                                                                         Type of assessment:  Formative        Summative                                                              
 +
 
 +
Assessor's status           Consultant                       Senior Trainee                     Other (Specify)
 +
 
 +
Brief description of case                                       
 +
 
 +
 
 +
'''Please grade the following areas using the scale below''' (use tick or cross)
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="6" |'''Attitude and manner'''
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' introduce themselves and establish the name  of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer). Their  demeanour throughout shows that they are attentive to the patient by  gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They clearly  explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out.
 +
 
 +
'''Poor trainees''' fail to introduce themselves and do not  identify the patient.  They appear to  hurry or ignore what the patient is saying.  They do not explain the test in an appropriate manner.
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Fair'''
| colspan="2" |'''Good'''
+
|'''Good'''
|'''V Good'''
+
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|-
|Instructions to patient
+
|Introduction and explanation of  examination
 +
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Familiarity with use of lenses
+
|Rapport with patient, empathy and  sensitivity to age and context
 +
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Correct use of slit lamp illumination
+
|Respect for patient
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|}
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="6" |'''Cover test and eye movements'''
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' comment on corneal reflexes and any abnormal head posture,  ptosis, pupils etc. They use suitable near and distance fixation targets.  They perform cover-uncover and alternate cover tests purposefully without  excessive repetition and identify abnormalities accurately. Their  instructions to the patient are clear and unambiguous throughout. The  examination flows easily and appropriate versions, ductions, vergences and  saccade checks are performed in response to findings.
 +
 
 +
'''Poor trainees''' fail to perform a general inspection of the patient. Their  instructions to the patient are ambiguous and confusing so that the patient  is unclear what is expected of them. They perform the tests clumsily, without  an obvious plan and important steps are missed. They miss and/or fail to  interpret important clinical signs.
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
|'''Poor'''
 +
|'''Fair'''
 +
|'''Good'''
 +
|'''V  Good'''
 +
|'''n/a'''
 +
|-
 +
|Observation of associated ocular  signs and head position
 +
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |
 
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Appropriate use of lenses
+
|Use of fixation targets
 +
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |
 
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Description of findings
+
|Performance of cover, cover-uncover  test and alternate cover test.
 +
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |
 
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|Assessment of versions, ductions,  vergences, saccades
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 +
|-
 +
|Interpretation of findings
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,850: Line 6,254:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|}
+
|}  
 
 
 
 
5.2.1.11 Clinical Rating scale CRS8 (CA8: Fundus Examination – Fundus contact lens)
 
  
 
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
  
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRS8 (CA8: Fundus Examination)'''
+
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRS5 (Outcome CA5''': '''Cover Test and Ocular Motility)'''
  
All trainees must be able to examine the fundus of the eye using appropriate techniques and interpret their findings. They must be able to use the direct and indirect ophthalmoscopes. They must be able to use a variety of lenses for binocular fundus examination with the slit lamp. They must be able to use appropriate indentation techniques.
+
All trainees must be able to perform a cover test, assess ocular movements and interpret the findings. They must be able perform a prism cover test.  They must also be able to recognise and describe nystagmus if present.
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="6" |'''Fundus contact lenses'''  
+
| colspan="6" |'''Prism cover test'''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' set up the slit lamp illumination and eyepieces before  commencing the examination. They help the patient to get into position if  necessary. They warn the patient of the brightness of the light. They ensure  that the patient's ocular surface is adequately anaesthetised. They choose the most appropriate lens and ensure that it is disinfected and clean. They choose the most appropriate colour, size and brightness of light at every  stage and empathise with the patient who has difficulty keeping the eye still. Their technique is fluent and they are able to view all structures required. They describe their findings accurately.
+
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' give clear instructions to the patient. They perform the test at near and distance and with/without glasses or head posture if appropriate. They hold the prism bar at a comfortable and effective distance with prisms  aligned in the correct position for the deviation. They perform an alternate cover test with increasing prism strength until the deviation is reversed.  They interpret the test accurately.
  
'''Poor trainees''' rush into the examination without setting the slit lamp  properly. They start with an inappropriately bright light but have to fiddle  around to get it pointing correctly. They show frustration when patients  cannot place their head appropriately, cannot hold their eye still or have  difficulty tolerating the contact lens. They choose an inappropriate lens,  show no regard to disinfection procedures and have difficulty getting the  lens positioned correctly. If they manage to achieve a view at all they miss abnormalities altogether and/or fail to describe them.
+
'''Poor trainees''' leave the patient unclear what is expected of them. They are  unfamiliar with the prism bar. They miss important steps and they fail to  assess the angle with acceptable accuracy.
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|  
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Fair'''
Line 5,874: Line 6,275:
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|-
|Instructions to and preparation of patient
+
|Explanation of test
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,881: Line 6,282:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Familiarity with use of lenses
+
|Appropriate positioning of  prism bar
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,888: Line 6,289:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Correct use of slit lamp  illumination
+
|Assessment of angle
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,895: Line 6,296:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Appropriate use of lenses
+
|Interpretation of results
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,901: Line 6,302:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|-
+
|}
|Description of findings
+
{| class="wikitable"
|
+
|'''Overall performance in this  assessment'''
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}  
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|'''Overall performance in this  assessment'''
 
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Fair'''
Line 5,922: Line 6,316:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
  '''Summative Outcome ('''Delete as appropriate if tool used for summative assessments)'''                             Pass/Fail'''
+
  '''Summative Outcome ('''Delete as appropriate if tool used for summative assessments)'''                             Pass/Fail '''
 +
 
 +
''(Note: "Pass" requires an overall assessment grade of "Good" and '''NO''' individual "Poor" grades.)''''' '''
  
''' '''
 
  
''(Note: "Pass" requires an overall assessment grade of "Good" and '''NO''' individual "Poor" grades.)''
 
 
'''Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.'''
 
'''Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.'''
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
|Anything especially good?
+
|              
|Suggestions for development:
+
 
 +
Anything especially good?
 +
|
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Suggestions for development:
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |Agreed action:
+
| colspan="2" |
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Agreed action:
  
  
Line 5,939: Line 6,345:
 
                
 
                
  
'''Signature of assessor:                                         Signature of trainee:'''
+
'''Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee:'''
  
 +
====== Clinical Rating Scale CRS6 (Outcome CA6: IOP MeASUREMENT) ======
 +
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
  
5.2.1.12 Clinical Rating Scale CRSret (Outcome PS1a: Refraction)
+
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRS6 (CA6''': '''IOP Measurement)'''
  
'''COECSA  Workplace Based Assessments'''
+
All trainees must be able to measure the intraocular pressure accurately using a variety of applanation techniques and understand the limits of each.  They must be able to check the calibration of the tonometer.
  
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRSret (Outcome PS1a: Refraction)'''
 
  
All trainees must be able to perform an accurate refraction objective and subjective refraction, performing appropriate tests (for adults) and provide an appropriate prescription.
+
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                                                         Date (dd/mm/yyyy)          
  
 
+
YEAR1                                        YEAR 2                            YEAR 3                                    YEAR 4                                   Other (specify)
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                                                         Date (dd/mm/yyyy)                  
 
 
 
     YEAR1                                YEAR 2                            YEAR 3                                    YEAR 4                                   Other (specify)  
 
  
 
Assessor's name:
 
Assessor's name:
Line 5,961: Line 6,365:
  
  
Brief description of case                                        
+
Brief description of case(s)                                  
  
 +
'''Please grade the following areas using the scale below''' (use tick or cross)
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Attitude and manner'''
 
| colspan="6" |'''Attitude and manner'''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' introduce themselves and  establish the identity of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse,  parent, carer). Their demeanour throughout the interview shows that they are  actively listening to the patient by gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They establish a good rapport with the patient which  is respectful of any ethnic, religious or social preferences that they  express. They are empathic and sensitive to the patient’s concerns. They ensure that the patient is comfortable and that adequate privacy is maintained. They guide the patient considerately through the clinical  examination.  
+
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' introduce themselves and  establish the identity of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse,  parent, carer). Their demeanour throughout shows that they are attentive to the patient by gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They clearly explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out.  They ensure that the patient is comfortable and that adequate privacy is maintained.  
  
'''Poor trainees''' neither introduce  themselves nor identify the patient.  They hurry the patient and ignore what the patient is saying.  They look away or appear impatient during the history takingThey are unable to  establish rapport with the patient and show little respect. They pay little  or no attention to confirmation of patient comfort or privacy. They proceed  with the examination without adequate explanation and with little  consideration for patient comfort.
+
'''Poor trainees''' fail to introduce  themselves and do not identify the patient.  They appear to hurry or ignore what the patient is saying.  They do not explain the test in an appropriate manner.  They pay little or no attention to confirmation of patient comfort or privacy.
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
Line 5,977: Line 6,382:
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|-
|Introduction and start of interview
+
|Introduction and explanation  of examination
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Rapport with patient and development of trust
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,991: Line 6,389:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Listening skills, appropriate eye contact and non-verbal communication
+
|Rapport with patient, empathy and sensitivity to age and context
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 5,998: Line 6,396:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Empathy and sensitivity
+
|Respect for patient and  their comfort
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Respect for patient
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,012: Line 6,403:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
 +
 +
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="6" |'''Retinoscopy'''
+
| colspan="6" |'''IOP  measurement (Technique: Goldmann/Tonopen/Perkins/other)'''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' carry out an examination in an appropriate environment, and allow adequate time for full cycloplegia if needed.  They carry out an accurate retinoscopy at a suitable working distance. Use of lenses and frames is tidy  and efficient. Their examination is fluent where possible and appropriate  opportunities are maximised when cooperation is suboptimal. Accurate notation of retinoscopy, using power crosses and indication of working distances, is used. An appropriate prescription is then calculated with an understanding of adjustments made in relation to the clinical case. They carry out proper  subjective refraction.
+
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' ensure adequate disinfection of the tonometer before and after use. They insert appropriate amounts of appropriate drops, avoid contact of the  tonometer with lids or lashes and complete the measurement swiftly without prolonged contact between tonometer and cornea. They achieve a reading  accurate to within 2 mm Hg of the assessor’s reading. They are conversant with all types of IOP measurement methods and the advantages and  disadvantages of each.
  
'''Poor trainees''' position the patient or themselves poorly. They do not allow adequate time for cycloplegia. They do not attend to the room environment (patient comfort, lighting etc). Retinoscopy is chaotic with untidy use of lenses and other equipmentNotation of findings is unclear or ambiguous. They do not understand the importance of adjusting the final prescription.
+
'''Poor trainees''' have to be prompted to ensure disinfection of the tonometer tip before and after use.  They insert  inappropriate quantities of anaesthetic drops or use inappropriate  drops.  They push roughly on the patient’s eye and lids and touch the tonometer on the lids.  They have difficulty achieving a readingrequiring several attempts, and fail to achieve accuracy to within 2 mm  Hg.  They frequently cause trauma to the corneal epithelium. They are not fully aware of all types of measurement methods or their advantages and disadvantages.
 
|-
 
|-
|  
+
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Fair'''
Line 6,026: Line 6,419:
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|-
|Patient positioning/room setup
+
|Consent for test
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|Application of anaesthesia and fluorescein
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,033: Line 6,433:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Appropriate cycloplegia
+
|Stabilisation of lids and  eye
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,040: Line 6,440:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Use of trial frame/lenses
+
|Use of tonometer.  Accurate placement on eye
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,047: Line 6,447:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Appropriate refining (Cross cylinder, Duochrome test)
+
|Accurate IOP recording.  Accurate to within 2mm Hg
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,054: Line 6,454:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Time taken/flow of examination
+
|Interpretation of result
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,061: Line 6,461:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Accuracy of retinoscopy
+
|Corneal appearance after  examination
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,068: Line 6,468:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Notation of retinoscopy/working distance
+
|Care of tonometer head
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,075: Line 6,475:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Appropriate prescription  issued
+
|Infection control
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,081: Line 6,481:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|}
+
|}  
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
|'''Overall performance in this assessment'''
+
| colspan="6" |'''Checking  calibration of tonometer'''
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' know how to use the calibration arm and what to do if the reading is  inaccurate.
 +
 
 +
'''Poor trainees''' do not know what to do with the calibration arm and do not know what  an inaccurate reading is, or what to do about it.
 +
|-
 +
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 +
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|Knowledge of reasons for calibration
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,094: Line 6,502:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|}
 
'''Outcome''' (Delete as appropriate) '''           Pass/Fail'''
 
 
'''Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.'''
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|Anything especially good?
 
|Suggestions for development:
 
|-
 
| colspan="2" |Agreed action:
 
 
 
 
|}
 
              
 
 
'''Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee'''
 
 
5.2.1.13 CRSret (Outcome PS1b: Cycloplegic Refraction)
 
 
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 
 
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRSret (Outcome PS1b: Cycloplegic Refraction)'''
 
 
All trainees must be able to perform an accurate cycloplegic refraction (especially on a child) and provide an appropriate prescription.
 
 
 
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                                                         Date (dd/mm/yyyy)                  
 
 
     YEAR1                                YEAR 2                            YEAR 3                                    YEAR 4            Other (specify)
 
 
Assessor's name:
 
 
 
Assessor's status:         Consultant                                               AHP                           Other (Specify)
 
 
 
Brief description of case                                      
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Attitude and manner'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' introduce themselves and  establish the name of the child and any other attendant (e.g. parent, carer).  They explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out. They  interact with the child using language and gestures appropriate for the  child’s age. They are sympathetic to any distress felt by the child or carer  and offer on-going encouragement and praise throughout the examination. They  display good judgement regarding the limitations of the assessment and  pursuit of clinical signs.
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' neither introduce  themselves nor identify the patient.  They are insensitive to distress felt by the  child and their carer. Their demeanour is often inappropriate for the child’s  age and they make little attempt to interact with the child. They offer  little or no encouragement. They needlessly prolong the examination to no  benefit.
 
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|Appropriate use of calibration arm
|'''Poor'''
+
|
|'''Fair'''
+
|
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Introduction and explanation  of examination
 
|
 
|
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Rapport with child/carer,  empathy and sensitivity to age and context
+
|Interpretation of results
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,160: Line 6,517:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Respect for child/carer
+
|Appropriate action taken
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,166: Line 6,523:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|}
+
|}  
 
 
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="6" |'''Retinoscopy'''
+
|'''Overall performance in this assessment'''
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' carry out an examination in  an appropriate environment, and allow adequate time for full  cycloplegia.  They carry out an  accurate retinoscopy at a suitable working distance. Use of lenses and frames  is tidy and efficient. Their examination is fluent where possible and appropriate  opportunities are maximised when cooperation is suboptimal. Accurate notation  of retinoscopy, using power crosses and indication of working distances, is  used. An appropriate prescription is then calculated with an understanding of  adjustments made in relation to the clinical case.
 
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' position the patient or  themselves poorly. They do not allow adequate time for cycloplegia. They do  not attend to the room environment (patient comfort, lighting etc).  Retinoscopy is chaotic with untidy use of lenses and other equipment.  Notation of findings is unclear or ambiguous. They do not understand the  importance of adjusting the final prescription.
 
|-
 
|
 
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
|'''n/a'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
|Patient positioning/room  setup
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,189: Line 6,536:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|-
+
|}
|Appropriate cycloplegia
+
 
|
+
 
|
+
'''Outcome''' (Delete as appropriate) '''                             Pass/Fail'''
|
+
 
|
+
'''''NB The following boxes MUST be completed:'''''
 +
 
 +
              
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 
|
 
|
 +
 +
 +
Please note any aspects which were especially  good:
 +
|-
 +
|Please note any  suggestions for improvement and action points:
 +
|}
 +
              
 +
 +
 +
'''Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee:'''
 +
 +
====== Clinical Rating scale CRS7 (CA7: Use of Slit Lamp) ======
 +
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 +
 +
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRS7 (CA7: Use of Slit Lamp)'''
 +
 +
All trainees must be able to examine the eye and adjacent structures using the slit lamp and interpret their findings. They must be able to employ all of the functions of the slit lamp and use accessory equipment when indicated. They must know how to care for the equipment properly and prevent cross infection.
 +
 +
                                                                                              
 +
 +
Trainee’s Nam                                                                                                                                                        Date (dd/mm/yyyy)              
 +
 +
YEAR 1                                YEAR 2                   YEAR 3            YEAR 4             Other (specify)
 +
 +
Assessor's name                                                                                          Type of assessment:  Formative          Summative                                                                
 +
 +
Assessor's status           Consultant                       Senior Trainee                    Other (Specify)
 +
 +
Brief description of case                                       
 +
 +
                                              
 +
 +
 +
'''Please grade the following areas using the scale below''' (use tick or cross)
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="6" |'''Attitude and manner'''
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' introduce themselves and establish the name  of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer). Their  demeanour throughout shows that they are attentive to the patient by  gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They clearly  explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out.
 +
 +
'''Poor trainees''' fail to introduce themselves and do not  identify the patient.  They appear to  hurry or ignore what the patient is saying.  They do not explain the test in an appropriate manner.
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
|'''Poor'''
 +
|'''Fair'''
 +
|'''Good'''
 +
|'''V Good'''
 +
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|-
|Use of trial frame/lenses
+
|Introduction and explanation of examination
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,204: Line 6,601:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Time taken/flow of examination
+
|Rapport with patient, empathy and sensitivity to age and context
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,211: Line 6,608:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Accuracy of retinoscopy
+
|Respect for patient
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,217: Line 6,614:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|-
+
|}
|Notation of  retinoscopy/working distance
+
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="6" |'''Knowledge of slit lamp'''
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' set up the slit lamp properly in advance of  conducting the examination. They appropriately set the IPD and focus of each  eyepiece, and have a good knowledge of all the slit lamp functions and  techniques of illumination to achieve the optimum view of the part of the eye  being examined. They know what adjustments to make to view different areas of  the anterior and posterior segment. They are aware of appropriate care and  maintenance of the slit lamp.
 +
 
 +
'''Poor trainees''' fail to set up the slit lamp properly. Their examination technique is slip shod and halting and they make constant aimless  readjustments. They appear unaware of the best slit lamp settings to optimise  the examination of different parts of the anterior and posterior  segments. 
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
|'''Poor'''
 +
|'''Fair'''
 +
|'''Good'''
 +
|'''V Good'''
 +
|'''n/a'''
 +
|-
 +
|Appropriate IPD
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|Appropriate eyepiece focus
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|Appropriate selection of slit beam  size and angle
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,225: Line 6,650:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Appropriate prescription issued
+
|Use of full range of available magnification powers
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,231: Line 6,656:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|'''Overall performance in this assessment'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|Use of appropriate filters
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,244: Line 6,663:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|}
+
|}  
  
 +
'''Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee:'''
  
  
'''Outcome''' (Delete as appropriate) '''           Pass/Fail''' 
+
====== Clinical Rating scale CRS8 (CA8: Fundus Examination – Direct opthalmoscope) ======
  
'''Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.'''
+
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
{| class="wikitable"
 
|              
 
  
Anything especially good?
+
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRS8 (CA8: Fundus Examination)'''
|
 
  
 +
All trainees must be able to examine the fundus of the eye using appropriate techniques and interpret their findings. They must be able to use the direct and indirect ophthalmoscopes. They must be able to use a variety of lenses for binocular fundus examination with the slit lamp. They must be able to use appropriate indentation techniques.
  
Suggestions for development:
+
                              
|-
 
| colspan="2" |
 
  
 +
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                Date (dd/mm/yyyy)                
  
Agreed action:
+
YEAR 1                                YEAR 2                   YEAR 3            YEAR 4             Other (specify)
|}
 
                
 
  
'''Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee'''
+
Assessor's name                                                                                           Type of assessment:  Formative         Summative                                                                
  
5.2.1.14 Clinical Rating scale CRS13 (CA13:  Gonioscopy)
+
Assessor's status           Consultant                       Senior Trainee                  Other (Specify)
  
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
+
Brief description of case                                       
  
'''Clinical rating Scale CRS13 (CA13: Gonioscopy)'''
 
 
All trainees must be able to perform gonioscopy using an indirect gonioscopy lens, identify the major angle landmarks, record their findings using a major grading system and clinically apply their findings.
 
 
 
 
 
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Date (dd/mm/yyyy)         
 
 
YEAR1                                                                 YEAR 2                            YEAR 3                                    YEAR 4                                   Other (specify)
 
 
Assessor's name:
 
 
 
Assessor's status:          Consultant                                                 AHP                                                     Other (Specify)
 
 
 
Brief description of case(s)                                                                                     
 
  
 
'''Please grade the following areas using the scale below''' (use tick or cross)
 
'''Please grade the following areas using the scale below''' (use tick or cross)
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="6" |'''Attitude and manner'''
+
| colspan="6" |'''Attitude and manner'''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' introduce themselves and establish the  identity of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer).  Their demeanour throughout shows that they are attentive to the patient by  gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They clearly  explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out.  They ensure that the patient is comfortable  and that adequate privacy is maintained.  
+
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' introduce themselves and establish the name of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer). Their demeanour throughout shows that they are attentive to the patient by  gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They clearly  explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out.
  
'''Poor trainees''' fail to introduce themselves and do not identify the patient.  They appear to hurry or ignore what the patient is saying.  They do not explain the test in an appropriate manner.  They pay little or no attention to  confirmation of patient comfort or privacy.
+
'''Poor trainees''' fail to introduce themselves and do not identify the patient.  They appear to hurry or ignore what the patient is saying.  They do not explain the test in an appropriate manner.
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
Line 6,303: Line 6,701:
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''Good'''
|'''V Good'''
+
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|-
|Introduction and explanation of examination
+
|Introduction and explanation of examination
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|Rapport with patient, empathy and  sensitivity to age and context
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,313: Line 6,718:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Rapport  with patient, empathy and sensitivity to age and context
+
|Respect for patient
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,320: Line 6,725:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Respect  for patient and their comfort
+
|Aware of patient’s comfort
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,326: Line 6,731:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|}  
+
|}
 
 
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="6" |'''Gonioscopy (Technique: indirect, dynamic, corneal light wedge)'''
+
| colspan="6" |'''Direct ophthalmoscope'''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' ensure  adequate disinfection of the gonioscopy lens before and after use. They  anesthetize the eye. They do not cause corneal abrasions.  They record angle findings to within 1 grade of the assessor’s findings. They can identify all major angle landmarks, perform the corneal light wedge technique and dynamic gonioscopy when  indicated.  They are conversant with  the different types of grading systems and understand the advantages and  disadvantages of each.
+
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' check the ophthalmoscope before using it. They select the most appropriate colour, shape, size and brightness of light beam at every stage. They always choose the most appropriate correcting lens. They explain the procedure and show that they understand the discomfort caused by the  brightness of the light. They readily achieve a good view of the central  fundus and achieve a view as far peripherally as is feasible. Their technique is efficient and fluent. They will describe their findings accurately.
  
'''Poor trainees''' have to be prompted to ensure disinfection of gonioscopy lens before and after use.   They insert inappropriate quantities of anaesthetic drops or use  inappropriate drops.  They push roughly  on the patient’s eye with the lens and frequently cause trauma to the corneal  epithelium.  They have difficulty identifying and interpreting the angle.   They do not know when or how to perform the corneal light wedge  technique or dynamic gonioscopy.  They  are not conversant with the major grading systems of the angle nor are they able to explain the advantages and disadvantages of each. 
+
'''Poor trainees''' launch into the examination without checking the instrument settings. They show no understanding of the uses of the different settingsTheir use of the lenses is haphazard. They are unable to co-ordinate an  examination of the peripheral fundus. They fail to understand and empathise with the patient when the patient finds the light uncomfortable. They miss abnormalities altogether and/or fail to describe them.
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
Line 6,340: Line 6,743:
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''Good'''
|'''V Good'''
+
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|-
|Consent  for test
+
|Instructions to patient
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,350: Line 6,753:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Application of anaesthesia
+
|Familiarity with use of ophthalmoscope
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,357: Line 6,760:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Stabilisation  of lids and eye
+
|Correct use of illumination
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,364: Line 6,767:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Use of the gonioscopy lens
+
|Appropriate use of lenses
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,371: Line 6,774:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Accurate  angle recording within 1 grade of assessor
+
|Description of findings
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,377: Line 6,780:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|-
+
|}
|Interpretation of result
+
 
 +
====== Clinical Rating scale CRS8 (CA8: Fundus Examination – indirect ophthalmoscope) ======
 +
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 +
 
 +
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRS8 (CA8: Fundus Examination)'''
 +
 
 +
All trainees must be able to examine the fundus of the eye using appropriate techniques and interpret their findings. They must be able to use the direct and indirect ophthalmoscopes. They must be able to use a variety of lenses for binocular fundus examination with the slit lamp. They must be able to use appropriate indentation techniques.
 +
 
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="6" |'''Indirect ophthalmoscope'''
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' adjust the equipment appropriately before use, in particular  adjusting the light for optimum viewing. They examine the patient in a  reclined position whenever appropriate and ensure their comfort. They choose  the most appropriate condensing lens and demonstrate an efficient and fluent  technique, holding the lens at the best distance from the eye. When  appropriate they use indentation efficiently and gently. They use the minimum  light necessary for a proper view and empathise with the patient when the  light or the indentation causes discomfort. They describe their findings accurately.
 +
 
 +
'''Poor trainees''' struggle to place the ophthalmoscope in position on their head  squarely and securely. They are unable to adjust the light appropriately.  They fail to ensure that the patient is comfortable or appropriately  positioned. They use too much or too little illumination. Their use and  positioning of the lens is haphazard. They are unable to co-ordinate an  examination of the peripheral fundus and are rough with and/or unsuccessful  at indentation. They fail to understand and empathise with the patient when  the patient finds the test uncomfortable. If they manage to achieve a view at  all they miss abnormalities altogether and/or fail to describe them.
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
|'''Poor'''
 +
|'''Fair'''
 +
|'''Good'''
 +
|'''V  Good'''
 +
|'''n/a'''
 +
|-
 +
|Instructions to patient
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|Familiarity with use of  ophthalmoscope
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,385: Line 6,817:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Corneal  appearance after examination
+
|Correct use of illumination
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,392: Line 6,824:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Care of gonioscopy lens
+
|Appropriate use of lenses
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,399: Line 6,831:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Infection  control
+
|Indentation technique
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,405: Line 6,837:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|'''Overall  performance in this assessment'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|Description of findings
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,418: Line 6,844:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|}
+
|}  
  
'''Outcome''' (Delete as appropriate) '''                             Pass/Fail'''  
+
====== Clinical Rating scale CRS8 (CA8: Fundus Examination – 78d/90d lens) ======
 +
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
  
'''''NB The following boxes MUST be completed:'''''
+
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRS8 (CA8: Fundus Examination)'''
  
                               
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
|
+
| colspan="7" |'''78D/90D lens'''
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="7" |'''Very good trainees''' set up the slit lamp illumination and eyepieces before commencing the  examination. They help the patient to get into position if necessary. They  warn of the brightness of the light. They select the most appropriate lens  and show expertise in holding it in the correct position and orientation.  They choose the most appropriate colour, size and brightness of light at  every stage and empathise with the patient who has difficulty looking in the  correct direction. Thel have a fluent technique and achieve as good a view of  both central and peripheral retina as is possible. They describe their  findings accurately.
  
 
+
'''Poor trainees''' rush into the examination without setting the slit lamp properly. They start with an inappropriately bright light but have to fiddle around to  get it pointing correctly. They show frustration when the patient cannot  place his/her head appropriately or cannot move the eye into the desired  position. They choose an inappropriate lens and/or show difficulty in getting  it positioned correctly. If they manage to achieve a view at all they miss  abnormalities altogether and/or fail to describe them.
Please note any aspects which were especially good:
 
 
|-
 
|-
|Please  note any suggestions for improvement and action points:
+
|
|}
+
|'''Poor'''
 
+
|'''Fair'''
 
+
| colspan="2" |'''Good'''
'''Signature of assessor:                                                                                           Signature of trainee:'''
+
|'''V Good'''
 
+
|'''n/a'''
5.2.2 Case-based Discussion (CbD)
+
|-
 +
|Instructions to patient
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|Familiarity with use of lenses
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|Correct use of slit lamp illumination
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|Appropriate use of lenses
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|Description of findings
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| colspan="2" |
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
====== Clinical Rating Scale CRSret (Outcome PS1a: Refraction) ======
 +
'''COECSA  Workplace Based Assessments'''
  
Competence in patient investigation, patient management, and community eye health, and some aspects of best practice domain is assessed using a CbD form. These forms can be completed by trainers in the following circumstances:
+
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRSret (Outcome PS1a: Refraction)'''
  
* During an out-patient clinic. Trainers and trainees may wish to    allocate 5-10 minutes to discuss the management of a patient seen during    an out-patient clinic. Case selection would be determined by either the    trainee or trainer. The trainee should have had some direct clinical role    with the patient e.g. history taking, clinical examination, investigations    ordered or interpreted, management decisions, management of complications,    critical incidents etc.
+
All trainees must be able to perform an accurate refraction objective and subjective refraction, performing appropriate tests (for adults) and provide an appropriate prescription.
* At the end of an out-patient clinic. Trainers and trainees may wish    to allocate some time at the end of clinic to review a small number of    case notes where the trainee has had a significant role in the management    of the patient.
 
* Case presentations during postgraduate teaching. Trainees are often    asked to present cases at local or regional postgraduate teaching    sessions. A nominated trainer should complete a CbD form after the    presentation.
 
* During a designated teaching session. Trainers and trainees may    wish to allocate a period of one-to-one teaching or small group teaching    where cases are discussed and a CbD form completed.
 
  
A list of Clinical Scenarios (approximately 40) that cover most of the COECSA curriculum is provided in the Study Guide  link. Trainees should aim to cover all these scenarios in their case based discussions if possible so that their portfolio reflects a wide range of clinical management situations.
 
  
It is recommended that about half the cases for CbD are chosen by the trainee and half by the trainer.
+
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                                                         Date (dd/mm/yyyy)                  
  
Trainees need to complete 10 CbDs during each year of training and these should be suitably spread throughout the year. By the end of training a trainee's portfolio should contain at least 40 CbD forms. Case based discussion is an important way to show that a trainee is developing her or his patient management skills and that he/she is able to relate his/her knowledge and skills to everyday ophthalmic practice. It is therefore appropriate that the level of competence documented on the CbD forms during Yr1 and Yr2 is at a lower level than during Yr3 and Yr4.
+
     YEAR1                                YEAR 2                            YEAR 3                                    YEAR 4                                   Other (specify)
  
'''Clinical Scenarios'''
+
Assessor's name:
  
As an ophthalmologist you will be expected to manage a range of clinical scenarios. This may involve referrals from other health professionals, patient self-referrals or screening for ophthalmic disease.
 
  
Below is a list of typical problems that may present to an ophthalmologist.
+
Assessor's status:         Consultant                                               AHP                           Other (Specify)
{| class="wikitable"
 
|'''Symptoms'''
 
|'''Signs'''
 
|-
 
|
 
  
'''Decreased Vision'''
 
  
* '''Transient'''
+
Brief description of case                                      
* '''Sudden'''
 
* '''Gradual'''
 
* '''Painful'''
 
  
'''Diplopia'''
+
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="6" |'''Attitude and manner'''
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' introduce themselves and  establish the identity of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse,  parent, carer). Their demeanour throughout the interview shows that they are  actively listening to the patient by gestures, words of encouragement and  appropriate eye contact. They establish a good rapport with the patient which  is respectful of any ethnic, religious or social preferences that they  express. They are empathic and sensitive to the patient’s concerns. They  ensure that the patient is comfortable and that adequate privacy is  maintained. They guide the patient considerately through the clinical  examination.
  
'''Distortion'''
+
'''Poor trainees''' neither introduce  themselves nor identify the patient.  They hurry the patient and ignore what the patient is saying.  They look away or appear impatient during  the history taking.  They are unable to  establish rapport with the patient and show little respect. They pay little  or no attention to confirmation of patient comfort or privacy. They proceed  with the examination without adequate explanation and with little  consideration for patient comfort.
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
|'''Poor'''
 +
|'''Fair'''
 +
|'''Good'''
 +
|'''V Good'''
 +
|'''n/a'''
 +
|-
 +
|Introduction and start of interview
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|Rapport with patient and development of trust
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|Listening skills, appropriate eye contact and  non-verbal communication
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|Empathy and sensitivity
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|Respect for patient
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|}
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="6" |'''Retinoscopy'''
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' carry out an examination in  an appropriate environment, and allow adequate time for full cycloplegia if  needed.  They carry out an accurate  retinoscopy at a suitable working distance. Use of lenses and frames is tidy  and efficient. Their examination is fluent where possible and appropriate  opportunities are maximised when cooperation is suboptimal. Accurate notation  of retinoscopy, using power crosses and indication of working distances, is  used. An appropriate prescription is then calculated with an understanding of  adjustments made in relation to the clinical case. They carry out proper  subjective refraction.
  
'''Dry Eyes'''
+
'''Poor trainees''' position the patient or  themselves poorly. They do not allow adequate time for cycloplegia. They do  not attend to the room environment (patient comfort, lighting etc).  Retinoscopy is chaotic with untidy use of lenses and other equipment.  Notation of findings is unclear or ambiguous. They do not understand the  importance of adjusting the final prescription.
 
 
'''Floaters'''
 
 
 
'''Headache'''
 
 
 
'''Night Blindness'''
 
 
 
'''Pain'''
 
 
 
* '''Ocular'''
 
* '''Periocular'''
 
 
 
'''Red Eye'''
 
 
 
'''Trauma'''
 
 
 
'''Visual Disturbance'''
 
 
 
'''Watery'''
 
|Ametropia
 
 
 
Corneal Opacities
 
 
 
Conjunctival Pigmentation
 
 
 
Dysgenesis/Colobomata
 
 
 
Lens Opacities
 
 
 
Lid Lumps
 
 
 
Lid Malposition
 
 
 
Macular Exudation
 
 
 
Nystagmus
 
 
 
Ocular Tumours
 
 
 
Optic Disc Atrophy/Swelling
 
 
 
Proptosis
 
 
 
Pupil Abnormalities
 
 
 
Raised Intraocular Pressure
 
 
 
Retinal Haemorrhages
 
 
 
Retinal Pigmentation
 
 
 
Strabismus
 
 
 
Visual Field Defects
 
 
 
Visual Handicap in a Child
 
 
 
Vasculature abnormalities
 
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|  
|
+
|'''Poor'''
|}
+
|'''Fair'''
 
 
 
 
During your training you will be expected to discuss the management of patients with seniors in the form of a Case-Based Discussion. You should ensure that during your training all these common clinical presentations have been covered in at least one case-based discussion.
 
 
 
In addition, these clinical scenarios may form a focus for learning. Using these commonly encountered scenarios enhances the value of on-the-job learning, increasing learning efficiency and relevancy.
 
 
 
Whilst learning about a patient with one of the above clinical problems you should consider which learning outcomes may be addressed. By thinking of the patient's problem in terms of the 10 learning outcome domains, you can integrate your knowledge (basic science and clinical), skills and attitudes.
 
 
 
The scenarios may be used in a variety of learning situations e.g. clinics, theatre, small / large group teaching, independent study.
 
 
 
 
 
5.2.2.1 Case-based Discussion (CbD) assessment form
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
 
 
 
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                                                         Date (dd/mm/year)
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
     YEAR1                           YEAR2                                             YEAR 3                            YEAR 4                                   Other (specify)
 
 
 
Assessor's name:
 
 
 
 
 
Assessor's status:         Consultant                                               AHP                           Other (Specify)
 
 
 
 
 
Clinical Scenario (see Study Guide )
 
 
 
 
 
Diagnosis
 
 
 
 
 
Overall difficulty of case                Simple                                                        Intermediate                                                                 Difficult
 
 
 
Subspecialty: Plastics/Lac/Orbits      Cornea/Ext       Cataract/Ref          Glaucoma       Retina/Uvea/Onco       Neuro        Paeds/Strab
 
 
 
(if identifiable)
 
 
 
'''Please grade the trainee’s performance under the curricular domains as listed below.'''
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|'''Topic'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|-
|Medical Record Keeping
+
|Patient positioning/room  setup
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,592: Line 6,999:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Clinical Assessment
+
|Appropriate cycloplegia
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,599: Line 7,006:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Investigation and Referrals
+
|Use of trial frame/lenses
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,606: Line 7,013:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Treatment
+
|Appropriate refining (Cross  cylinder, Duochrome test)
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,613: Line 7,020:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Follow-up and Future Planning
+
|Time taken/flow of examination
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,620: Line 7,027:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Professionalism
+
|Accuracy of retinoscopy
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,627: Line 7,034:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Clinical Judgment
+
|Notation of  retinoscopy/working distance
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,634: Line 7,041:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|Leadership/Manager Issues
+
|Appropriate prescription  issued
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,640: Line 7,047:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|}  
+
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
|'''Overall performance in this assessment'''
+
|'''Overall performance in this assessment'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Fair'''
Line 6,654: Line 7,061:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
 +
'''Outcome''' (Delete as appropriate) '''           Pass/Fail'''
 +
 
'''Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.'''
 
'''Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.'''
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
|
+
|Anything especially good?
 
+
|Suggestions for development:
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="2" |Agreed action:
  
Please note any aspects which were  especially good (assessor):
 
|
 
  
  
Please note any suggestions for improvement  and action points (assessor):
 
 
 
|-
 
| colspan="2" |What have I learnt (Trainee):
 
 
|}
 
|}
Now associate this to the 3 most relevant Learning Outcomes consider choosing one from each Curriculum theme
+
              
  
 +
'''Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee'''
  
'''Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee:'''
+
====== CRSret (Outcome PS1b: Cycloplegic Refraction) ======
 +
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
  
 +
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRSret (Outcome PS1b: Cycloplegic Refraction)'''
  
_______________________                                                          _____________________________
+
All trainees must be able to perform an accurate cycloplegic refraction (especially on a child) and provide an appropriate prescription.
  
  
5.2.3 Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS)
+
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                                                         Date (dd/mm/yyyy)                  
  
Competence in 19 of the 14 practical skills (PS) listed in the COECSA curriculum, and in surgical skills (SS13, SS14 and SS15) is assessed using a modified version of the F2 DOPS rating scale. [PS1 (refraction) is assessed by CRSretPS1a for adults, CRSret, Retinoscopy paediatric and formal COECSA examination.
+
     YEAR1                                YEAR 2                            YEAR 3                                    YEAR 4            Other (specify)  
  
How a practical procedure is taught will be determined by the individual trainer and informed by an appropriate training the trainers course. When trainees have the opportunity to perform the procedure themselves they must do so under appropriate supervision. The supervisor will be able to complete a DOPS at the end of the procedure. If there are aspects of the procedure that are not performed satisfactorily the completed DOPS will act as a guide for training and inform the next attempt. It is expected that for some of the more complex practical procedures e.g. PS2 "Drug administration", a trainee will require assessment on more than one occasion (heir portfolio will reflect  this). Where possible a trainee will arrange to have at least 2 satisfactory DOPS for each of the relevant Learning Outcomes. Where opportunities to perform a procedure are scarce e.g. PS11"Corneal glue", it may be appropriate for the portfolio to contain only one DOPS. The ultimate decision as to how many are appropriate will be the responsibility institution examination committee.
+
Assessor's name:
  
Where appropriate it is useful for initial DOPS to be completed using any simulators that are available e.g. in a clinical skills centre. The DOPS form must make it clear that the assessment has been carried out using a simulator.
 
  
Trainees should also maintain a logbook of procedures performed with reflective comments where appropriate as part of their portfolio.
+
Assessor's status:         Consultant                                               AHP                           Other (Specify)
  
Where a trainee has an opportunity to perform a practical procedure that is not included in the curriculum e.g. as part of sub-specialty training, she/he is encouraged to ask the trainer to complete a DOPS for inclusion in the portfolio.
 
  
The following practical skills Learning Outcomes are assessed by DOPS:
+
Brief description of case                                      
  
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="2" |'''Learning Outcome(Click here for DOPS form)'''
+
| colspan="6" |'''Attitude and manner'''
|'''Target Year (TYA)*'''
 
|'''Comments'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
|'''PS8'''
+
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' introduce themselves and  establish the name of the child and any other attendant (e.g. parent, carer).  They explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out. They  interact with the child using language and gestures appropriate for the  child’s age. They are sympathetic to any distress felt by the child or carer  and offer on-going encouragement and praise throughout the examination. They  display good judgement regarding the limitations of the assessment and  pursuit of clinical signs.
|Ocular surface FB
+
 
|1
+
'''Poor trainees''' neither introduce  themselves nor identify the patient.  They are insensitive to distress felt by the  child and their carer. Their demeanour is often inappropriate for the child’s age and they make little attempt to interact with the child. They offer  little or no encouragement. They needlessly prolong the examination to no  benefit.
|DOPS can be completed by an appropriately trained nurse or senior resident
 
 
|-
 
|-
|'''PS5'''
+
|
|Tear film
+
|'''Poor'''
|2
+
|'''Fair'''
|DOPS can be completed by senior Resident
+
|'''Good'''
 +
|'''V Good'''
 +
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|-
|'''PS6'''
+
|Introduction and explanation  of examination
|Lacrimal drainage
+
|
 +
|
 +
|
 
|
 
|
|DOPS can be completed by senior Resident
 
|-
 
|'''PS7'''
 
|Corneal scrape
 
|2
 
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|'''PS9'''
+
|Rapport with child/carer,  empathy and sensitivity to age and context
|Removal of sutures
+
|
|2
+
|
|DOPS can be completed by an appropriately  trained nurse
+
|
 +
|
 +
|
 
|-
 
|-
|'''PS14'''
+
|Respect for child/carer
|Perform/teach hand hygiene
+
|
|2
+
|
|DOPS can be completed by an appropriately  trained nurse
+
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|}
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="6" |'''Retinoscopy'''
 
|-
 
|-
|'''PS2'''
+
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' carry out an examination in  an appropriate environment, and allow adequate time for full  cycloplegia.  They carry out an  accurate retinoscopy at a suitable working distance. Use of lenses and frames  is tidy and efficient. Their examination is fluent where possible and appropriate  opportunities are maximised when cooperation is suboptimal. Accurate notation  of retinoscopy, using power crosses and indication of working distances, is  used. An appropriate prescription is then calculated with an understanding of  adjustments made in relation to the clinical case.
|Local anaesthesia
+
 
|3
+
'''Poor trainees''' position the patient or  themselves poorly. They do not allow adequate time for cycloplegia. They do  not attend to the room environment (patient comfort, lighting etc).  Retinoscopy is chaotic with untidy use of lenses and other equipment.  Notation of findings is unclear or ambiguous. They do not understand the importance of adjusting the final prescription.
|May require several DOPS for different LA techniques
 
 
|-
 
|-
|'''PS10'''
+
|
|Fit a bandage contact lens
+
|'''Poor'''
|3
+
|'''Fair'''
|DOPS can be completed by an appropriately  trained nurse
+
|'''Good'''
 +
|'''V Good'''
 +
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|-
|'''SS13'''
+
|Patient positioning/room  setup
|Laser to the lens capsule
+
|
|3
+
|
 +
|
 +
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|'''SS14'''
+
|Appropriate cycloplegia
|Laser for raised intraocular pressure
+
|
|3/4 (annual review)
+
|
|May require several DOPS for different laser  therapies
+
|
 +
|
 +
|
 
|-
 
|-
|'''S15'''
+
|Use of trial frame/lenses
|Laser for retinal problems
+
|
|3/4 (annual review)
+
|
|May require several DOPS for different laser  therapies
+
|
 +
|
 +
|
 
|-
 
|-
|'''PS3'''
+
|Time taken/flow of  examination
|Diathermy
+
|
|3
+
|
|May be incorporated with a surgical OSATS
+
|
 +
|
 +
|
 
|-
 
|-
|'''PS2'''
+
|Accuracy of retinoscopy
|Intraocular/periocular drugs
+
|
|¾
+
|
|May require several DOPS for different LA  techniques
+
|
 +
|
 +
|
 
|-
 
|-
|'''PS4'''
+
|Notation of  retinoscopy/working distance
|Cryotherapy
+
|
|¾
+
|
|May be incorporated with a surgical OSATS
+
|
 +
|
 +
|
 
|-
 
|-
|'''PS11'''
+
|Appropriate prescription  issued
|Corneal glue
+
|
|¾
+
|
|.
+
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|}
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|'''Overall performance in this assessment'''
 +
|'''Poor'''
 +
|'''Fair'''
 +
|'''Good'''
 +
|'''V Good'''
 
|-
 
|-
|'''PS13'''
+
|
|Ocular /orbital ultrasound
+
|
|¾
+
|
|.
+
|
|-
+
|
|'''SS16'''
+
|}
|AC/vitreous tap
 
 
|.
 
|-
 
|'''SS10'''
 
|Prepare biopsy
 
 
|.
 
|-
 
|'''PS12'''
 
|Forced duction test
 
 
|.
 
|}
 
<nowiki>*</nowiki> The TYA represents the latest year that a trainee should normally achieve the specified LO. Trainees are encouraged to seek assessment using DOPS when an opportunity arises and not wait until the target year.
 
  
By completion of training a trainee's portfolio may contain around 60 satisfactory DOPS forms
 
  
 +
'''Outcome''' (Delete as appropriate) '''           Pass/Fail''' 
  
5.2.3.1 Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) form
+
'''Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.'''
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|              
 +
 
 +
Anything especially good?
 +
|
  
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessment and Feedback Form'''
 
  
'''Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS)'''
+
Suggestions for development:
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="2" |
  
 
 
  
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                                                         Date (dd/mm/yyyy)                    
+
Agreed action:
 +
|}
 +
              
  
Trainee's year:            Year1                       Year 2                   Year 3            Year4                                Other (specify)
+
'''Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee'''
  
Assessor's name
+
====== Clinical Rating scale CRS13 (CA13:  Gonioscopy) ======
 +
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
  
 
+
'''Clinical rating Scale CRS13 (CA13: Gonioscopy)'''
  
Assessor's status           Consultant                      Senior Trainee                                Other (Specify)                                  
+
All trainees must be able to perform gonioscopy using an indirect gonioscopy lens, identify the major angle landmarks, record their findings using a major grading system and clinically apply their findings.
  
 
 
 
 
  
Learning Outcome     Title                                                                                                                                                                                      Code
+
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Date (dd/mm/yyyy)           
  
                                   
+
YEAR1                                                                 YEAR 2                            YEAR 3                                    YEAR 4                                   Other (specify)
  
Brief description of procedure
+
Assessor's name:
 
 
Overall difficulty of case                                        Simple                                                        Intermediate                                                                 Difficult
 
  
  
Number of times procedure performed before One                                                   Two to four                      Five to nine                                  More than nine            
+
Assessor's status:          Consultant                                                 AHP                                                     Other (Specify)
  
  
Procedure performed on                                      Simulator                           Wet lab                       Volunteer                 Patient
+
Brief description of case(s)                                                                                     
  
 
'''Please grade the following areas using the scale below''' (use tick or cross)
 
'''Please grade the following areas using the scale below''' (use tick or cross)
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="6" |'''Attitude  and manner'''
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="6" |'''V good  trainees''' introduce themselves and establish the  identity of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer).  Their demeanour throughout shows that they are attentive to the patient by  gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They clearly  explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out.  They ensure that the patient is comfortable  and that adequate privacy is maintained.
 +
 +
'''Poor  trainees''' fail to introduce themselves and do not  identify the patient.  They appear to  hurry or ignore what the patient is saying.  They do not explain the test in an appropriate manner.  They pay little or no attention to  confirmation of patient comfort or privacy.
 +
|-
 
|
 
|
 
 
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Fair'''
Line 6,842: Line 7,267:
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|-
|1       Demonstrates understanding of  indications, relevant anatomy,          techniques of procedure
+
|Introduction and explanation of examination
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,849: Line 7,274:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|2       Obtains informed consent
+
|Rapport with patient, empathy and sensitivity to age and context
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,856: Line 7,281:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|3       Demonstrates appropriate preparation pre-procedure
+
|Respect for patient and their comfort
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,862: Line 7,287:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 +
|}
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="6" |'''Gonioscopy (Technique: indirect, dynamic, corneal light wedge)'''
 
|-
 
|-
|4       Appropriate analgesia
+
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' ensure  adequate disinfection of the gonioscopy lens before and after use. They  anesthetize the eye. They do not cause corneal abrasions.  They record angle findings to within 1  grade of the assessor’s findings. They can identify all major angle landmarks,  perform the corneal light wedge technique and dynamic gonioscopy when  indicated.  They are conversant with  the different types of grading systems and understand the advantages and  disadvantages of each.
 +
 
 +
'''Poor  trainees''' have to be prompted to ensure disinfection  of gonioscopy lens before and after use.  They insert inappropriate quantities of anaesthetic drops or use  inappropriate drops.  They push roughly  on the patient’s eye with the lens and frequently cause trauma to the corneal  epithelium.  They have difficulty  identifying and interpreting the angle.  They do not know when or how to perform the corneal light wedge  technique or dynamic gonioscopy.  They  are not conversant with the major grading systems of the angle nor are they  able to explain the advantages and disadvantages of each.   
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
|'''Poor'''
 +
|'''Fair'''
 +
|'''Good'''
 +
|'''V Good'''
 +
|'''n/a'''
 +
|-
 +
|Consent  for test
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|Application of anaesthesia
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,870: Line 7,316:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|5       Technical ability
+
|Stabilisation of lids and eye
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,877: Line 7,323:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|6       Aseptic technique
+
|Use of the gonioscopy lens
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,884: Line 7,330:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|7       Seeks help where appropriate
+
|Accurate angle recording within 1 grade of assessor
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,891: Line 7,337:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|8       Awareness of potential complications and how to avoid them
+
|Interpretation of result
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,898: Line 7,344:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|9       Post procedure management
+
|Corneal appearance after examination
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,905: Line 7,351:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|10     Communication skills
+
|Care of gonioscopy lens
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,912: Line 7,358:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|11     Consideration to patient/professionalism
+
|Infection control
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 6,918: Line 7,364:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|}  
+
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
|'''Overall performance in this assessment'''
+
|'''Overall performance in this assessment'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Fair'''
Line 6,931: Line 7,377:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|}
+
|}
'''Outcome''' (Delete as appropriate) '''           Meets Expectations/Does not meet Expectations    ''' (for stage of training)
+
 
 +
'''Outcome''' (Delete as appropriate) '''                             Pass/Fail'''  
  
'''Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.'''
+
'''''NB The following boxes MUST be completed:'''''
  
 +
                               
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
|Anything especially good? (assessor)
+
|
|Suggestions for development (assessor)
+
 
 +
 
 +
Please  note any aspects which were especially good:
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |What have I learnt? (trainee)
+
|Please  note any suggestions for improvement and action points:
 
|}
 
|}
  
  
'''Signature of assessor:                                                        Signature of trainee:'''
+
'''Signature of assessor:                                                                                           Signature of trainee:'''
  
 +
===== Case-based Discussion (CbD) =====
 +
Competence in patient investigation, patient management, and community eye health, and some aspects of best practice domain is assessed using a CbD form. These forms can be completed by trainers in the following circumstances:
  
5.2.4 Multi-Source Feedback (MSF)
+
* During an out-patient clinic. Trainers and trainees may wish to    allocate 5-10 minutes to discuss the management of a patient seen during    an out-patient clinic. Case selection would be determined by either the    trainee or trainer. The trainee should have had some direct clinical role    with the patient e.g. history taking, clinical examination, investigations    ordered or interpreted, management decisions, management of complications,    critical incidents etc.
 +
* At the end of an out-patient clinic. Trainers and trainees may wish    to allocate some time at the end of clinic to review a small number of    case notes where the trainee has had a significant role in the management    of the patient.
 +
* Case presentations during postgraduate teaching. Trainees are often    asked to present cases at local or regional postgraduate teaching    sessions. A nominated trainer should complete a CbD form after the    presentation.
 +
* During a designated teaching session. Trainers and trainees may    wish to allocate a period of one-to-one teaching or small group teaching    where cases are discussed and a CbD form completed.
  
Whilst several of the other Work-Based Assessments (WBA) will require a trainer to assess the trainee's attitude to the patient, some of the "Best Practice" (BP) and Communication (COM) learning outcomes will be assessed using MSF. (BP17 is actually achieved by taking part in MSF.) The MSF will be performed electronically via the on-line portfolio or by paper format. The process for obtaining MSF, which will be required on at least an '''annual basis,''' will resemble the following:
+
A list of Clinical Scenarios (approximately 40) that cover most of the COECSA curriculum is provided in the Study Guide  link. Trainees should aim to cover all these scenarios in their case based discussions if possible so that their portfolio reflects a wide range of clinical management situations.
  
* The trainee identifies 15 people who can be    approached to give feedback. The list should include consultant    supervisors and trainers, other trainees, Rota organizer, allied health    professionals (nurses, orthoptists, optometrists),    clerical/secretarial/administrative staff.
+
It is recommended that about half the cases for CbD are chosen by the trainee and half by the trainer.
* The trainee enters the details of these     chosen assessors into the on-line or paper format portfolio
+
 
* The list is approved on-line/or paper by    the trainee's educational supervisor
+
Trainees need to complete 10 CbDs during each year of training and these should be suitably spread throughout the year. By the end of training a trainee's portfolio should contain at least 40 CbD forms. Case based discussion is an important way to show that a trainee is developing her or his patient management skills and that he/she is able to relate his/her knowledge and skills to everyday ophthalmic practice. It is therefore appropriate that the level of competence documented on the CbD forms during Yr1 and Yr2 is at a lower level than during Yr3 and Yr4.
* The staff on the trainee's list are    contacted by email by letter and asked to complete an on-line or paper    feedback form that will cover the appropriate areas of the curriculum. The    trainee will not see individual responses.
+
 
* The results of feedback are collated and a     report is produced.
+
'''Clinical Scenarios'''
* The trainee completes a self-assessment
 
* The MSF report is sent to the trainee's    educational supervisor who arranges to meet with the trainee to discuss    the contents and any action required.
 
  
The following LO will be assessed using MSF:
+
As an ophthalmologist you will be expected to manage a range of clinical scenarios. This may involve referrals from other health professionals, patient self-referrals or screening for ophthalmic disease.
  
 +
Below is a list of typical problems that may present to an ophthalmologist.
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="2" |'''Learning Outcome  (LO)'''   
+
|'''Symptoms'''
|'''Typical question'''
+
|'''Signs'''
|'''Feedback likely  from*'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
|'''PS21'''
+
|  
 +
 
 +
'''Decreased Vision'''
 +
 
 +
* '''Transient'''
 +
* '''Sudden'''
 +
* '''Gradual'''
 +
* '''Painful'''
 +
 
 +
'''Diplopia'''
 +
 
 +
'''Distortion'''
 +
 
 +
'''Dry Eyes'''
 +
 
 +
'''Floaters'''
 +
 
 +
'''Headache'''
 +
 
 +
'''Night Blindness'''
  
'''SS3'''
+
'''Pain'''
  
'''CEH3'''
+
* '''Ocular'''
|Hand hygiene
+
* '''Periocular'''
  
Asepsis
+
'''Red Eye'''
  
X-infection
+
'''Trauma'''
|Follows local  guidelines on general cleanliness and avoidance of cross infection
+
 
|MS, AHP
+
'''Visual Disturbance'''
|-
+
 
|'''COM1'''
+
'''Watery'''
|Rapport
+
|Ametropia
|Establishes a  trusting clinical relationship with patients
+
 
|MS, AHP
+
Corneal Opacities
|-
+
 
|'''COM2'''
+
Conjunctival Pigmentation
|Listen
+
 
|Listens effectively  to patients
+
Dysgenesis/Colobomata
|MS, AHP
+
 
|-
+
Lens Opacities
|'''COM3'''
+
 
|Deliver
+
Lid Lumps
|Provides  information to patients in an appropriate and sensitive manner
+
 
|MS, AHP
+
Lid Malposition
|-
+
 
|'''COM5'''
+
Macular Exudation
|Consent
+
 
|Obtains valid  consent in an appropriate manner
+
Nystagmus
|MS, AHP
+
 
|-
+
Ocular Tumours
|'''COM6'''
+
 
|Breaking bad news
+
Optic Disc Atrophy/Swelling
|Communicates  potentially upsetting information in an appropriate and sensitive manner
+
 
|MS, AHP
+
Proptosis
|-
+
 
|'''COM7'''
+
Pupil Abnormalities
|Language
 
|Makes  allowances/provisions for difficulties in communication that may affect the  patient
 
|MS, AHP
 
|-
 
|'''COM8'''
 
|Body language
 
|Uses body language  to good effect in communication
 
|MS, AHP, S&C
 
|-
 
|'''COM10'''
 
|Professionals
 
|Communicates well  with clinical and non-clinical colleagues
 
|MS, AHP, S&C
 
|-
 
|'''COM11'''
 
  
'''COM12'''
+
Raised Intraocular Pressure
|Written notes
 
|The doctor writes  notes and dictates letters clearly
 
|MS, AHP, S&C
 
|-
 
|'''COM14'''
 
|Leave
 
|Complies with local  policies for the approval of leave and makes appropriate arrangements for  cover
 
|MS, AHP, S&C
 
|-
 
|'''BP10'''
 
|Compassion
 
|Has a compassionate  approach to patient care
 
|MS, AHP
 
|-
 
|'''BP11'''
 
|Autonomy
 
|Respects the  patient's wishes when making clinical decisions
 
|MS, AHP
 
|-
 
|'''BP12'''
 
|Considerate
 
|Behaves in a  considerate and sensitive manner towards all patients
 
|MS, AHP, S&C
 
|-
 
|'''BP13'''
 
|Empathy
 
|Shows appropriate  empathy with patients
 
|MS, AHP, S&C
 
|-
 
|'''BP14'''
 
|Confidentiality
 
|Respects the  confidential nature of clinical information obtained from patients
 
|MS, AHP, S&C
 
|-
 
|'''BP15'''
 
|Limits
 
|Works within the  limits of her/his clinical competence
 
|MS, AHP
 
|-
 
|'''BP16'''
 
|Help
 
|Seeks help and  advice from clinical colleagues when appropriate
 
|MS, AHP
 
|-
 
|'''BP18'''
 
|Equality
 
|Treats all patients  equally, avoiding discrimination
 
|MS, AHP, S&C
 
|-
 
|'''BP20'''
 
|Legal
 
|Practices according  to the National medical and dental practitioners council's guidelines for  doctors
 
|MS
 
|-
 
|'''BP24'''
 
|Prioritize
 
|Prioritizes tasks  appropriately, ensuring urgent and important matters are dealt with promptly
 
|MS, AHP, S&C
 
|-
 
|'''BP30'''
 
|Stress
 
|Copes well when  under stress
 
|MS, AHP, S&C
 
|}
 
<nowiki>*</nowiki> Feedback from:
 
  
* MS=medical staff
+
Retinal Haemorrhages
* AHP=allied health professional (nurse,    optometrist, orthoptists)
 
* S&C= secretarial and clerical staff
 
  
 +
Retinal Pigmentation
  
5.2.4.1 Multi-Source Feedback (MSF) form
+
Strabismus
  
                             
+
Visual Field Defects
  
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                         Date (dd/mm/year)                      
+
Visual Handicap in a Child
  
Trainee's year: Year 1          Year 2           Year 3          Year 4                      Other (specify)
+
Vasculature abnormalities
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|}
  
Assessor's name:
 
  
 +
During your training you will be expected to discuss the management of patients with seniors in the form of a Case-Based Discussion. You should ensure that during your training all these common clinical presentations have been covered in at least one case-based discussion.
  
Assessor's status:         Consultant                                               AHP                           Other (Specify)
+
In addition, these clinical scenarios may form a focus for learning. Using these commonly encountered scenarios enhances the value of on-the-job learning, increasing learning efficiency and relevancy.
  
'''Please grade the trainee’s performance against the statements as listed below'''
+
Whilst learning about a patient with one of the above clinical problems you should consider which learning outcomes may be addressed. By thinking of the patient's problem in terms of the 10 learning outcome domains, you can integrate your knowledge (basic science and clinical), skills and attitudes.
  
(Indicate “n/a” if you are unable to comment on any particular statement)
+
The scenarios may be used in a variety of learning situations e.g. clinics, theatre, small / large group teaching, independent study.
  
(*Note: This is an anonymous assessment but comments may inevitably provide a clue to their origin. If you have anxieties about making particular comments in writing please indicate “will discuss” and do so as soon as possible with an appropriate consultant supervisor in your unit.)
+
====== Case-based Discussion (CbD) assessment form ======
 +
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
  
{| class="wikitable"
+
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                                                         Date (dd/mm/year)
|'''Curricular'''
 
  
'''Codes'''
+
   
|
 
  
'''Statement'''
+
     YEAR1                           YEAR2                                             YEAR 3                            YEAR 4                                   Other (specify)
|'''They perform to a high  standard in this area of practice'''
 
  
'''(Tick)'''
+
Assessor's name:
|'''I have no concerns in this  area of practice'''
 
  
'''(Tick)'''
 
|'''I have some'''
 
  
'''Concerns in this area of  practice'''
+
Assessor's status:         Consultant                                               AHP                           Other (Specify)
  
'''(Tick)'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
  
'''(Tick)'''
+
Clinical Scenario (see Study Guide )
|'''Comments*'''
 
  
'''''(Essential if concerns exist)'''''
 
  
'''(Continue overleaf if  necessary)'''
+
Diagnosis
|-
 
|'''PS21/'''
 
  
'''SS3'''
 
|Follows local guidelines on general cleanliness and avoidance of cross  infection
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|'''COM1'''
 
|Establishes a trusting clinical relationship  with patients
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|'''COM2'''
 
|Listens effectively to patients
 
  
 +
Overall difficulty of case                Simple                                                        Intermediate                                                                 Difficult
  
|
+
Subspecialty: Plastics/Lac/Orbits      Cornea/Ext       Cataract/Ref          Glaucoma       Retina/Uvea/Onco       Neuro        Paeds/Strab
|
+
 
|
+
(if identifiable)
|
+
 
|
+
'''Please grade the trainee’s performance under the curricular domains as listed below.'''
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|'''Topic'''
 +
|'''Poor'''
 +
|'''Fair'''
 +
|'''Good'''
 +
|'''V Good'''
 +
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|-
|'''COM3'''
+
|Medical Record Keeping
|Provides information to patients in an appropriate  and sensitive manner
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 7,175: Line 7,548:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|'''COM5'''
+
|Clinical Assessment
|Obtains valid consent in an appropriate manner
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 7,183: Line 7,555:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|'''COM6'''
+
|Investigation and Referrals
|Communicates potentially upsetting information  in an appropriate and sensitive manner
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 7,191: Line 7,562:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|'''COM7'''
+
|Treatment
|Makes allowances/provisions for difficulties  in communication that may affect the patient
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 7,199: Line 7,569:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|'''COM8'''
+
|Follow-up and Future Planning
|Uses body language to good effect in communication
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 7,207: Line 7,576:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|'''COM10'''
+
|Professionalism
|Communicates well with clinical and  non-clinical colleagues
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 7,215: Line 7,583:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|'''COM11'''
+
|Clinical Judgment
 
 
'''COM12'''
 
|The doctor writes notes and dictates letters  clearly
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 7,225: Line 7,590:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|'''COM14'''
+
|Leadership/Manager Issues
|Complies with local policies for the approval  of leave and makes appropriate arrangements for cover
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 7,232: Line 7,596:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 +
|}
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|'''Overall performance in this  assessment'''
 +
|'''Poor'''
 +
|'''Fair'''
 +
|'''Good'''
 +
|'''V Good'''
 
|-
 
|-
|'''BP10'''
 
|Has a compassionate approach to patient care
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 7,240: Line 7,609:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|-
+
|}
|'''BP11'''
+
'''Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.'''
|Respects the patient’s wishes when making  clinical decisions
+
{| class="wikitable"
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|'''BP12'''
 
|Behaves in a considerate and sensitive manner  towards all patients
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|'''BP13'''
 
|Shows appropriate empathy with patients
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
 
|
 
|
 +
 +
 +
Please note any aspects which were  especially good (assessor):
 
|
 
|
  
  
 +
Please note any suggestions for improvement  and action points (assessor):
 +
 +
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="2" |What have I learnt (Trainee):
 +
|}
 +
Now associate this to the 3 most relevant Learning Outcomes consider choosing one from each Curriculum theme
  
  
 +
'''Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee:'''
  
  
|-
+
_______________________                                                          _____________________________
|'''Curricular'''
 
  
'''Codes'''
+
===== Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) =====
|
+
Competence in 19 of the 14 practical skills (PS) listed in the COECSA curriculum, and in surgical skills (SS13, SS14 and SS15) is assessed using a modified version of the F2 DOPS rating scale. [PS1 (refraction) is assessed by CRSretPS1a for adults, CRSret, Retinoscopy paediatric and formal COECSA examination.
  
'''Statement'''
+
How a practical procedure is taught will be determined by the individual trainer and informed by an appropriate training the trainers course. When trainees have the opportunity to perform the procedure themselves they must do so under appropriate supervision. The supervisor will be able to complete a DOPS at the end of the procedure. If there are aspects of the procedure that are not performed satisfactorily the completed DOPS will act as a guide for training and inform the next attempt. It is expected that for some of the more complex practical procedures e.g. PS2 "Drug administration", a trainee will require assessment on more than one occasion (heir portfolio will reflect  this). Where possible a trainee will arrange to have at least 2 satisfactory DOPS for each of the relevant Learning Outcomes. Where opportunities to perform a procedure are scarce e.g. PS11"Corneal glue", it may be appropriate for the portfolio to contain only one DOPS. The ultimate decision as to how many are appropriate will be the responsibility institution examination committee.
|'''They perform to a high standard in this area of practice'''
 
  
'''(tick)'''
+
Where appropriate it is useful for initial DOPS to be completed using any simulators that are available e.g. in a clinical skills centre. The DOPS form must make it clear that the assessment has been carried out using a simulator.
|'''I have no concerns in this area of practice'''
 
  
(Tick)
+
Trainees should also maintain a logbook of procedures performed with reflective comments where appropriate as part of their portfolio.
|'''I have some'''
 
  
'''Concerns in this area of practice'''
+
Where a trainee has an opportunity to perform a practical procedure that is not included in the curriculum e.g. as part of sub-specialty training, she/he is encouraged to ask the trainer to complete a DOPS for inclusion in the portfolio.
  
(Tick)
+
The following practical skills Learning Outcomes are assessed by DOPS:
|'''n/a'''
 
  
(Tick)
+
{| class="wikitable"
|'''Comments*'''
+
| colspan="2" |'''Learning Outcome(Click here for DOPS form)'''
 
+
|'''Target Year (TYA)*'''
'''''(Essential if concerns  exist)'''''
+
|'''Comments'''
 
 
(Continue overleaf if  necessary)
 
 
|-
 
|-
|'''BP14'''
+
|'''PS8'''
|Respects the confidential nature of clinical  information obtained from patients
+
|Ocular surface FB
|
+
|1
|
+
|DOPS can be completed by an appropriately  trained nurse or senior resident
|
 
|
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
|'''BP15'''  
+
|'''PS5'''
|Works within the limits of her/his clinical  competence
+
|Tear film
|
+
|2
|
+
|DOPS can be completed by senior Resident
|
+
|-
 +
|'''PS6'''
 +
|Lacrimal drainage
 
|
 
|
 +
|DOPS can be completed by senior Resident
 +
|-
 +
|'''PS7'''
 +
|Corneal scrape
 +
|2
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|'''BP16'''
+
|'''PS9'''
|Seeks help and advice from clinical colleagues when appropriate
+
|Removal of sutures
|
+
|2
|
+
|DOPS can be completed by an appropriately trained nurse
|
+
|-
|
+
|'''PS14'''
|
+
|Perform/teach hand hygiene
 +
|2
 +
|DOPS can be completed by an appropriately  trained nurse
 
|-
 
|-
|'''BP18'''
+
|'''PS2'''
|Treats all patients equally, avoiding  discrimination
+
|Local anaesthesia
|
+
|3
|
+
|May require several DOPS for different LA  techniques
|
 
|
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
|'''BP20'''
+
|'''PS10'''
|Practises according  to the National medical and dental practitioner’s council's guidelines for  doctors
+
|Fit a bandage contact lens
|
+
|3
|
+
|DOPS can be completed by an appropriately  trained nurse
|
 
|
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
|'''BP24'''
+
|'''SS13'''
|Prioritizes tasks appropriately, ensuring  urgent and important matters are dealt with promptly
+
|Laser to the lens capsule
|
+
|3
|
 
|
 
|
 
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|'''BP30'''
+
|'''SS14'''
|Copes well when under stress
+
|Laser for raised intraocular pressure
 
+
|3/4 (annual review)
 
+
|May require several DOPS for different laser  therapies
|
+
|-
|
+
|'''S15'''
|
+
|Laser for retinal problems
|
+
|3/4 (annual review)
|
+
|May require several DOPS for different laser  therapies
|}
+
|-
{| class="wikitable"
+
|'''PS3'''
|'''Space for   further comments''' (please    indicate Curricular Code to which comments refer, e.g. “BP10” etc.)
+
|Diathermy
 +
|3
 +
|May be incorporated with a surgical OSATS
 +
|-
 +
|'''PS2'''
 +
|Intraocular/periocular drugs
 +
 +
|May require several DOPS for different LA  techniques
 +
|-
 +
|'''PS4'''
 +
|Cryotherapy
 +
 +
|May be incorporated with a surgical OSATS
 +
|-
 +
|'''PS11'''
 +
|Corneal glue
 +
 +
|.
 +
|-
 +
|'''PS13'''
 +
|Ocular /orbital ultrasound
 +
 +
|.
 +
|-
 +
|'''SS16'''
 +
|AC/vitreous tap
 +
 +
|.
 +
|-
 +
|'''SS10'''
 +
|Prepare biopsy
 +
 +
|.
 +
|-
 +
|'''PS12'''
 +
|Forced duction test
 +
 +
|.
 
|}
 
|}
 +
<nowiki>*</nowiki> The TYA represents the latest year that a trainee should normally achieve the specified LO. Trainees are encouraged to seek assessment using DOPS when an opportunity arises and not wait until the target year.
  
 +
By completion of training a trainee's portfolio may contain around 60 satisfactory DOPS forms
  
 +
====== Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) form ======
  
 +
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessment and Feedback Form'''
  
 +
'''Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS)'''
  
 +
 
  
 +
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                                                         Date (dd/mm/yyyy)                  
  
5.2.5 Objectively Structured Assessment Of Technical Skills (OSATS)
+
Trainee's year:            Year1                       Year 2                   Year 3            Year4                                Other (specify)  
  
How a surgical procedure is taught will be determined by the individual trainer and informed by an appropriate training the trainers course (where available). When trainees have the opportunity to perform the procedure themselves they must do so under appropriate supervision. The supervisor will be able to complete an OSATS at the end of the procedure. If there are aspects of the procedure that are not performed satisfactorily the completed OSATS will act as a guide for training and inform the next attempt. Where possible a trainee will arrange to have at '''least 2 satisfactory OSATS''' for each of the Surgical Skills Learning Outcomes.
+
Assessor's name
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Assessor's status           Consultant                      Senior Trainee                                Other (Specify)                                  
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Learning Outcome     Title                                                                                                                                                                                      Code
 +
 
 +
                                 
 +
 
 +
Brief description of procedure
 +
 
 +
Overall difficulty of case                                        Simple                                                        Intermediate                                                                 Difficult
  
It is expected that several OSATS will be completed and kept in the trainee's portfolio, before the first satisfactory OSATS is achieved for an individual Learning Outcome. It is important that a trainee and trainer understand that this is an important part of training and does not represent a problem with a trainee.
 
  
Trainees should also maintain a logbook of surgical and laser procedures performed with reflective comments where appropriate as part of their portfolio.
+
Number of times procedure performed before One                                                   Two to four                      Five to nine                                  More than nine          
  
Where appropriate it is useful for initial OSATS to be completed using any simulators that are available e.g. in a wet lab. The OSATS form must make it clear that the assessment has been carried out using a simulator.
 
  
The following surgical Learning Outcomes are assessed by OSATS:
+
Procedure performed on                                      Simulator                           Wet lab                       Volunteer                 Patient
  
 +
'''Please grade the following areas using the scale below''' (use tick or cross)
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
|'''WpBA'''
+
|
| colspan="2" |'''Learning Outcome  (LO)'''
 
|'''Target Year (TYA)*'''
 
|'''Comments'''
 
|-
 
|'''OSATS2'''
 
|SS2
 
|Operating  microscope
 
|1
 
|This LO can be  assessed by a senior resident (year   3  or 4)
 
|-
 
|'''OSATS3'''
 
|SS3
 
|Aseptic  technique
 
|1
 
|This LO can be  assessed by an appropriately trained theatre nurse
 
|-
 
|'''OSATS1'''
 
|SS1
 
|Microsurgical  skills
 
|2
 
| rowspan="3" |
 
  
  
 
+
|'''Poor'''
OSATS after  initial TYA should reflect an increase in complexity of cases
+
|'''Fair'''
 +
|'''Good'''
 +
|'''V Good'''
 +
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|-
|'''OSATS1'''
+
|1       Demonstrates understanding of  indications, relevant anatomy,          techniques  of procedure
|SS7
+
|
|Lid surgery
+
|
|¾
+
|
 +
|
 +
|
 
|-
 
|-
|'''OSATS1'''
+
|2       Obtains  informed consent
|SS4
+
|
|Cataract surgery
+
|
|¾
+
|
 +
|
 +
|
 
|-
 
|-
|'''OSATS1'''
+
|3       Demonstrates  appropriate preparation pre-procedure
|SS11
+
|
|Temporal artery  biopsy
+
|
|2
+
|
 +
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|'''OSATS1'''
+
|4       Appropriate  analgesia
|SS5
+
|
|Procedures to  lower IOP
+
|
|¾
+
|
 +
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|'''OSATS1'''
+
|5       Technical  ability
|SS6
+
|
|Ocular and  adnexal trauma
+
|
|2
+
|
 +
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|'''OSATS1'''
+
|6       Aseptic  technique
|SS8
+
|
|Ocular surface  protection
+
|
|1
+
|
 +
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|'''OSATS1'''
+
|7       Seeks  help where appropriate
|SS9
+
|
|Lateral  canthotomy/cantholysis
+
|
|2
+
|
 +
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|'''OSATS1'''
+
|8       Awareness  of potential complications and how to avoid them
|SS10
+
|
|Biopsy ocular  and adnexal tissue
+
|
|2
+
|
 
|
 
|
|-
 
|'''OSATS1'''
 
|SS12
 
|Extraocular  muscle surgery
 
 
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|'''OSATS1'''
+
|9       Post  procedure management
|SS13
+
|
|Removal of the  eye
+
|
|2
+
|
|This LO can be  assessed by a senior resident (year   3  or 4)
+
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|10     Communication  skills
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|11     Consideration  to patient/professionalism
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|}
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|'''Overall performance in this assessment'''
 +
|'''Poor'''
 +
|'''Fair'''
 +
|'''Good'''
 +
|'''V Good'''
 
|-
 
|-
|'''OSATS1'''
+
|
|SS17
+
|
|Anterior Vitrectomy
+
|
|¾
+
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
 +
'''Outcome''' (Delete as appropriate) '''           Meets Expectations/Does not meet Expectations    ''' (for stage of training)
  
 
+
'''Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.'''
<nowiki>*</nowiki> The TYA represents the latest year that a trainee must achieve the specified LO. Trainees are encouraged to seek assessment using OSATS when an opportunity arises and not wait until the target year.
 
 
 
5.2.6 The COECSA MSICS-OSCAR
 
 
 
'''The COECSA MSICS-OSCAR'''
 
 
 
This should be completed at the end of the case and immediately discussed with the student to provide timely, structured, specific performance feedback. Circle the appropriate cells and if previous MSICS-OSCARS are available review them in order to develop a plan for improvement
 
  
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="7" |''' ''' '''COECSA Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery -Ophthalmology Surgical  Competency Assessment Rubric: (COECSA MSICS-OSCAR)'''
+
|Anything especially good? (assessor)
 +
|Suggestions for development (assessor)
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |Date  ___________
+
| colspan="2" |What have I learnt? (trainee)
 +
|}
  
  
Resident _______
+
'''Signature of assessor:                                                        Signature of trainee:'''
  
 +
===== Multi-Source Feedback (MSF) =====
 +
Whilst several of the other Work-Based Assessments (WBA) will require a trainer to assess the trainee's attitude to the patient, some of the "Best Practice" (BP) and Communication (COM) learning outcomes will be assessed using MSF. (BP17 is actually achieved by taking part in MSF.) The MSF will be performed electronically via the on-line portfolio or by paper format. The process for obtaining MSF, which will be required on at least an '''annual basis,''' will resemble the following:
  
Evaluator  _______
+
* The trainee identifies 15 people who can be    approached to give feedback. The list should include consultant    supervisors and trainers, other trainees, Rota organizer, allied health    professionals (nurses, orthoptists, optometrists),    clerical/secretarial/administrative staff.
|Novice
+
* The trainee enters the details of these    chosen assessors into the on-line or paper format portfolio
 +
* The list is approved on-line/or paper by    the trainee's educational supervisor
 +
* The staff on the trainee's list are    contacted by email by letter and asked to complete an on-line or paper    feedback form that will cover the appropriate areas of the curriculum. The    trainee will not see individual responses.
 +
* The results of feedback are collated and a    report is produced.
 +
* The trainee completes a self-assessment
 +
* The MSF report is sent to the trainee's    educational supervisor who arranges to meet with the trainee to discuss    the contents and any action required.
  
(score = 2)
+
The following LO will be assessed using MSF:
|Beginner
+
 
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Learning Outcome  (LO)'''   
 +
|'''Typical question'''
 +
|'''Feedback likely  from*'''
 +
|-
 +
|'''PS21'''
 +
 
 +
'''SS3'''
  
(score = 3)
+
'''CEH3'''
|Advanced Beginner
+
|Hand hygiene
  
(score = 4)
+
Asepsis
|Competent
 
  
(score = 5)
+
X-infection
|Not applicable. Done by consultant or senior resident (score= 0)
+
|Follows local guidelines on general cleanliness and avoidance of cross infection
 +
|MS, AHP
 
|-
 
|-
|1  
+
|'''COM1'''
|Draping:
+
|Rapport
|Unable to start draping without help.
+
|Establishes a trusting clinical relationship with patients
|Drapes with minimal verbal instruction. Incomplete lash coverage.
+
|MS, AHP
|Lashes  mostly covered, drape at most minimally obstructing view.
 
|Lashes  completely covered and clear of incision site, drape not obstructing view.
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
|2
+
|'''COM2'''
|Scleral access &  Cauterization
+
|Listen
|Unable to successfully  access sclera. Cauterization insufficient or excessive both in intensity and  localization.
+
|Listens effectively  to patients
|Accesses sclera but with  difficulty and hesitation. Cauterization  insufficient or excessive in location or intensity.
+
|MS, AHP
|Achieves good scleral  access with mild difficulty. Adequate  cauterization.
 
|Precisely and deftly  accesses sclera. Appropriate and precise cauterization.
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
|3
+
|'''COM3'''
|Sclerocorneal Tunnel 
+
|Deliver
|Inappropriate incision depth, location, and size, hesitant dissection. Iris prolapse may occur
+
|Provides information to patients in an appropriate and sensitive manner
|One of the following  correct: incision depth, location or size.  Able to dissect forward but not  able to perceive depth
+
|MS, AHP
|Two of the  following are correct: incision depth, location or size. Understands that  tunnel depth is incorrect but unable to correct.
 
|Good incision depth,  location and size. Tunnel constructed at right plane, if inappropriate plane,  able to rectify.
 
 
 
|-
 
|-
|4
+
|'''COM5'''
|Corneal entry
+
|Consent
|Hesitant keratome entry into AC. Unable to extend the internal valve. Significant  shallowing of anterior chamber. Require wound extension or suturing.
+
|Obtains valid consent in an appropriate manner
|Enters  into AC but difficulty in extension. Follows a different plane. Entry either  anterior or posterior to dissection site. Mild AC shallowing. Require wound  extension or suturing.
+
|MS, AHP
|Entry at  right plane. Able to extend but with repeated use of viscoelastic. Internal  valve irregular. Require wound extension or suturing.
 
|Fluently  enters in right plane. Wound length adequate with no further need for  extension. Retains viscoelastic during extension. Self-sealing, provides good  access for surgical maneuvering.
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
|5
+
|'''COM6'''
|Paracentesis & Viscoelastic  insertion
+
|Breaking bad news
|Chamber collapses on performing paracentesis. Inappropriate width, length and  location. Pierces anterior capsule on entry.
+
|Communicates potentially upsetting information in an appropriate and sensitive manner
 
+
|MS, AHP
Unsure of  when, what type and how much viscoelastic to use. Has difficulty accessing  anterior chamber through paracentesis.
 
|Appropriate  incision width, location or length. Anterior chamber shallows mildly.  Requires minimal instruction. Knows when to use but administers incorrect  amount or type of viscoelastic.
 
|Inappropriate  location, width or length. Anterior chamber almost stable
 
 
 
Requires  no instruction. Administers viscoelastic at appropriate time, amount, type,  and cannula position.
 
|Wound of  adequate length, width, and correct location. Viscoelastics administered in  appropriate amount, at appropriate time, with cannula tip clear of lens  capsule and endothelium.
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
|6
+
|'''COM7'''
|Capsulorrhexis:  Commencement of Flap & follow-through.
+
|Language
|Instruction  required, tentative, chases rather than controls rhexis, cortex disruption may occur.
+
|Makes allowances/provisions for difficulties in communication that may affect the patient
|Minimal instruction, occasional loss of control of rhexis, cortex disruption may  occur.
+
|MS, AHP
|In  control, few awkward or repositioning movements, no cortex disruption.
 
|Delicate  approach and confident control of the rhexis, no cortex disruption.
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
|7
+
|'''COM8'''
|Capsulorrhexis: Formation and  Circular Completion
+
|Body language
|Size and position are inadequate for nucleus density, tear may occur.
+
|Uses body language to good effect in communication
|Size and  position are barely adequate for nucleus density, difficulty achieving  circular rhexis, tear may occur.
+
|MS, AHP, S&C
|Size and  position are almost exact for nucleus density, shows control, and requires  only minimal instruction.
 
|Adequate  size and position for nucleus density, no tears, rapid, unaided control of  radialization, maintains control of the flap and AC depth throughout the  capsulorrhexis.
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
|8
+
|'''COM10'''
|Hydrodissection:  Visible Fluid Wave and Free prolapse of one pole of nucleus
+
|Professionals
|Hydrodissection fluid not injected in quantity or place to achieve nucleus rotation or  prolapse.
+
|Communicates well with clinical and non-clinical colleagues
|Multiple  attempts required, able to prolapse nuclear pole after multiple efforts.  Manually forces nucleus prolapse before adequate hydrodissection; cheese  wiring.
+
|MS, AHP, S&C
|Fluid  injected in appropriate location, able to prolapse one pole of nucleus but  encounters more than minimal resistance.
 
|Ideally  see free fluid wave, adequate for free nuclear hydroprolapse or mechanical  prolapse with minimal resistance. Aware of contraindications to  hydrodissection.
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
|9
+
|'''COM11'''
|Prolapse of nucleus completely  into AC
+
 
|Unable to dial nucleus into AC. Hooks anterior or posterior nuclear surface, nucleus  rotates in the bag, iris and corneal touch, pupillary constriction, may  damage capsule or zonules.
+
'''COM12'''
|Prolapses  nucleus after repeated awkward attempts, needs instruction, churns cortex  causing reduced visibility; iris or corneal touch; no damage to capsule or  zonules.
+
|Written notes
|Prolapses  nucleus into AC with more than minimal resistance. No corneal touch.
+
|The doctor writes notes and dictates letters clearly
|Prolapse with minimal resistance. No damage to pupil and iris.
+
|MS, AHP, S&C
|
+
|-
 +
|'''COM14'''
 +
|Leave
 +
|Complies with local policies for the approval of leave and makes appropriate arrangements for  cover
 +
|MS, AHP, S&C
 
|-
 
|-
|10
+
|'''BP10'''
|Nucleus extraction
+
|Compassion
|Damages endothelium, iris or capsule, unable to hold and extract nucleus, movements  not coordinated.
+
|Has a compassionate approach to patient care
|Movements  coordinated but unable to extract nucleus, iris or corneal damage, unable to  assess wound size in relation to nuclear density.
+
|MS, AHP
|Removes  nucleus after repeated attempts, more than one piece, might need wound extension  prior to extraction.
 
|Extracts  nucleus with one or two attempts; proper wound size in relation to nuclear  density.
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
|11
+
|'''BP11'''
|Irrigation and Aspiration  Technique with Adequate Removal of Cortex
+
|Autonomy
|Great  difficulty introducing the aspiration tip under the capsulorrhexis border,  aspiration hole position not controlled, cannot regulate aspiration flow as  needed, cannot peel cortical material adequately, engages capsule or iris  with aspiration port.
+
|Respects the  patient's wishes when making clinical decisions
|Moderate  difficulty introducing aspiration tip under capsulorrhexis and maintaining  hole up position, attempts to aspirate without occluding tip, shows poor  comprehension of aspiration dynamics, cortical peeling is not well  controlled, jerky and slow, capsule potentially compromised. Prolonged  attempts result in minimal residual cortical material.
+
|MS, AHP
|Minimal  difficulty introducing the aspiration tip under the capsulorrhexis, aspiration hole usually up, cortex will engaged for 360 degrees, cortical  peeling slow, few technical errors, minimal residual cortical material. Some  difficulty in removing sub incisional cortex
 
|Aspiration  tip is introduced under the free border of the capsulorrhexis in irrigation  mode with the aspiration hole up, Aspiration is activated in just enough  flow as to occlude the tip, efficiently removes all cortex. The cortical  material is peeled gently towards the center of the pupil, tangentially in  cases of zonular weakness. No difficulty in removing subincisional cortex
 
|
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
|-
 
|-
|12
+
|'''BP12'''
|Lens Insertion,  Rotation, and Final Position of Intraocular Lens
+
|Considerate
 
+
|Behaves in a considerate and sensitive manner towards all patients
 
+
|MS, AHP, S&C
 
 
 
 
 
 
|Unable to insert IOL.
 
|Difficult insertion,  manipulation of IOL, rough handling, unstable anterior chamber. Repeated  hesitant attempts placing lower haptic in capsule, repeated attempts rotate upper haptic d into place with  excessive force.
 
|Insertion and manipulation  of IOL accomplished with minimal anterior chamber instability, the lower  haptic is placed with some difficulty, upper haptic is rotated with some  stress.
 
|Insertion and  manipulation of IOL is performed in a deep, and stable anterior chamber and  capsular bag, with incision appropriate for implant type.  The lower haptic is  smoothly placed inside the capsular bag; the upper haptic is rotated or  gently bent and inserted into  place without  exerting excessive stress to the capsulorrhexis or the zonule fibers.
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
|13
+
|'''BP13'''
|Wound Closure (Including Suturing,  Hydration, and Checking Security as Required)
+
|Empathy
|If suturing is needed, instruction  is required and stitches are placed in an awkward, slow fashion with much  difficulty, astigmatism, bent needles, incomplete suture rotation and wound  leakage may result, unable to remove viscoelastics thoroughly. unable to make  incision watertight or does not check wound for seal.  Improper final IOP.
+
|Shows appropriate empathy with patients
|If  suturing is needed, stitches are placed with some difficulty, resuturing may  be needed, questionable wound closure with probable astigmatism, instruction  may be needed, questionable whether all viscoelastics are thoroughly removed,  Extra maneuvers are required to make the incision water tight at the end of  the surgery. May have improper IOP.
+
|MS, AHP, S&C
|If  suturing is needed, stitches are placed with minimal difficulty tight  enough to maintain the wound closed, may have slight astigmatism, viscoelastics are adequately removed after this step with some difficulty,  The incision is checked and is water tight or needs minimal adjustment at the  end of the surgery. May have improper IOP.
 
|If  suturing is needed, stitches are placed tight enough to maintain the wound  closed, but not too tight as to induce astigmatism, viscoelastics are  thoroughly removed after this step, the incision is checked and is water  tight at the end of the surgery.  Proper final IOP.
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|'''BP14'''
| colspan="2" |'''Global  Indices'''
+
|Confidentiality
|
+
|Respects the  confidential nature of clinical information obtained from patients
|
+
|MS, AHP, S&C
|
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
|14
+
|'''BP15'''
|Wound Neutrality and Minimizing  Eye Rolling and Corneal Distortion
+
|Limits
|Nearly  constant eye movement and corneal distortion.
+
|Works within the  limits of her/his clinical competence
|Eye often  not in primary position, frequent distortion folds.
+
|MS, AHP
|Eye  usually in primary position, mild corneal distortion folds occur.
 
|The eye is  kept in primary position during the surgery. No distortion folds are produced. The length and location of incisions prevents distortion of the  cornea.
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
|15
+
|'''BP16'''
|Eye Positioned Centrally Within  Microscope View
+
|Help
|Constantly  requires repositioning.
+
|Seeks help and advice from clinical colleagues when appropriate
|Occasional  repositioning required.
+
|MS, AHP
|Mild  fluctuation in pupil position.
 
|The pupil is kept centered during the surgery.
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
|16
+
|'''BP18'''
|Conjunctival and Corneal Tissue  Handling
+
|Equality
|Tissue handling is rough and damage occurs.
+
|Treats all patients equally, avoiding discrimination
|Tissue  handling borderline, minimal damage occurs.
+
|MS, AHP, S&C
|Tissue  handling decent but potential for damage exists.
 
|Tissue is  not damaged nor at risk by handling.
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
|17
+
|'''BP20'''
|Intraocular Spatial Awareness
+
|Legal
|Instruments often in contact with capsule, iris, corneal endothelium; blunt second instrument not kept in appropriate position.
+
|Practices according to the National medical and dental practitioners council's guidelines for doctors
|Occasional  contact  with capsule, iris, corneal endothelium; sometimes has blunt second  instrument in appropriate position.
+
|MS
|Rare contact with  capsule, iris, endothelium. Often has blunt second hand instrument in  appropriate position.
 
|No  accidental contact  with capsule, iris, corneal endothelium. Blunt, second hand instrument, is kept in appropriate position.
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
|18
+
|'''BP24'''
|Iris  Protection
+
|Prioritize
|Iris constantly at risk, handled roughly.
+
|Prioritizes tasks appropriately, ensuring urgent and important matters are dealt with promptly
|Iris  occasionally at risk. Needs help in deciding when and how to use hooks, ring  or other methods of iris protection.
+
|MS, AHP, S&C
|Iris  generally well protected. Slight difficulty with iris hooks, ring or other  methods of iris protection.
 
|Iris is  uninjured. Iris hooks, ring, or other methods are used as needed to  protect the iris.
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
|19
+
|'''BP30'''
|Overall  Speed and Fluidity of Procedure
+
|Stress
|Hesitant,  frequent starts and stops, not at all fluid.
+
|Copes well when under stress
|Occasional  starts and stops, inefficient and unnecessary manipulations common, case  duration about 60 minutes.
+
|MS, AHP, S&C
|Occasional inefficient and/or unnecessary manipulations occur, case duration about 45  minutes.
 
|Inefficient  and/or unnecessary manipulations are avoided, case duration is appropriate  for case difficulty. In general, 30 minutes should be adequate.
 
|
 
 
|}
 
|}
Overall difficulty of procedure (circle):           Simple             Intermediate                Difficult
+
<nowiki>*</nowiki> Feedback from:
  
 +
* MS=medical staff
 +
* AHP=allied health professional (nurse,    optometrist, orthoptists)
 +
* S&C= secretarial and clerical staff
  
Good points: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
+
====== Multi-Source Feedback (MSF) form ======
 +
                             
  
Suggestions for development: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
+
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                         Date (dd/mm/year)                      
  
Agreed action: ­­­­­­
+
Trainee's year: Year 1          Year 2           Year 3          Year 4                      Other (specify)
  
 +
Assessor's name:
  
  
Signature of Assessor: __________________________________        Signature of Trainee: ____________________________________ 
+
Assessor's status:         Consultant                                               AHP                           Other (Specify)
  
 +
'''Please grade the trainee’s performance against the statements as listed below'''
  
 +
(Indicate “n/a” if you are unable to comment on any particular statement)
  
5.2.7 The COECSA TRAB-OSCAR
+
(*Note: This is an anonymous assessment but comments may inevitably provide a clue to their origin. If you have anxieties about making particular comments in writing please indicate “will discuss” and do so as soon as possible with an appropriate consultant supervisor in your unit.)
  
'''The COECSA TRAB-OSCAR'''
+
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|'''Curricular'''
  
This should be completed at the end of the case and immediately discussed with the student to provide timely, structured, specific performance feedback. Circle the appropriate cells and if previous MSICS-OSCARS are available review them in order to develop a plan for improvement
+
'''Codes'''
 +
|
  
 +
'''Statement'''
 +
|'''They perform to a high  standard in this area of practice'''
  
'''COECSA Trabeculectomy-Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubric (COECSATRAB-OSCAR)'''
+
'''(Tick)'''
 +
|'''I have no concerns in this  area of practice'''
  
 +
'''(Tick)'''
 +
|'''I have some'''
  
Resident: __________________  Assessor: ____________________         Year of Training:  __________    Date: ____________
+
'''Concerns in this area of practice'''
  
{| class="wikitable"
+
'''(Tick)'''
| colspan="2" |
+
|'''n/a'''
  
 +
'''(Tick)'''
 +
|'''Comments*'''
  
Surgical Step
+
'''''(Essential if concerns exist)'''''
|
 
  
 +
'''(Continue overleaf if  necessary)'''
 +
|-
 +
|'''PS21/'''
  
Novice
+
'''SS3'''
 
+
|Follows local guidelines on general cleanliness and avoidance of cross  infection
(score = 2)
 
| colspan="2" |
 
 
 
 
 
Beginner
 
 
 
(score = 3)
 
 
|
 
|
 
 
Advanced Beginner
 
 
(score = 4)
 
 
|
 
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|'''COM1'''
 +
|Establishes a trusting clinical relationship  with patients
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|'''COM2'''
 +
|Listens effectively to patients
  
  
Competent
+
|
 
+
|
(score = 5)
+
|
|Not applicable. Done by consultant  or senior resident (score= 0)
+
|
 +
|
 
|-
 
|-
|1
+
|'''COM3'''
|Universal precautions
+
|Provides information to patients in an appropriate and sensitive manner
|Has  not heard of universal precautions.
+
|
| colspan="2" |Aware  of time-out process but not confident to perform. May perform with guidance/  prompting, but misses some information.
+
|
|Able  to perform team time-out but needs prompting to do so.
+
|
|Independently  initiates team time-out at beginning of case, identifies correct patient,  procedure and side. Team members have been introduced. Alerts / allergies  noted.
+
|
| 
+
|
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|'''COM5'''
|Draping and placement of speculum
+
|Obtains valid consent in an appropriate manner
|Unable  to start draping without help.
+
|
| colspan="2" |Drapes  with minimal verbal instruction. Incomplete lash coverage.
+
|
|Lashes  mostly covered, drape at most minimally obstructing view.  Attains proper head position.
+
|
|Lashes  completely covered and clear of incision site, drape not obstructing view.
+
|
| 
+
|
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|'''COM6'''
|Corneal Traction Suture
+
|Communicates potentially upsetting information in an appropriate and sensitive manner
|Unable to describe purpose and method of inserting corneal traction suture.
+
|
| colspan="2" |Difficulty  loading needle, needs instruction for correct needle placement and completion  of suture placement.
+
|
|Able to load and handle needle  appropriately. Some difficulty in finding correct depth of suture, needs  instruction, needle track too deep or too shallow or bite not of ideal size.
+
|
|Is able to  consistently perform the step with the appropriate length of bite, depth of  suture and achieve the desired rotation of the eye for exposure.
+
|
| 
+
|
 
|-
 
|-
|4
+
|'''COM7'''
|Conjunctival incision and dissection
+
|Makes allowances/provisions for difficulties in communication that may affect the patient
|Is able to  describe but not able to perform limbal or fornix conjunctival incision for  trabeculectomy surgery.
+
|
| colspan="2" |Is able to  perform limbal or fornix conjunctival incision but is inefficient and  requires guidance.  Has difficulty with  judging appropriate length of incision, dissection down to sclera of both  conjunctiva and Tenon’s and the necessary force to apply to the tissue.  Has difficulty avoiding damage to the  superior rectus muscle with limbal-based conjunctival flap.
+
|
|Is able to  perform limbal or fornix conjunctival incisions but is inefficient or  tentative and requires guidance with technique and/or position and size of  incision.
+
|
|Performs  conjunctival incision without creating buttonholes and with no disruption of  adjacent tissues. Incision is of correct size (i.e. enough to give proper  exposure for performance of posterior subTenon’s dissection and formation of  scleral flap.
+
|
| 
+
|
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|'''COM8'''
|Hemostasis
+
|Uses body language to good effect in communication
|Is unable to  describe the need for hemostasis, type of cautery required, appropriate  technique. Is unable to perform.
+
|
| colspan="2" |Is able to  describe the need for hemostasis, type of cautery required, appropriate  technique. Has difficulty performing proper technique.
+
|
|Is able to  apply cautery but has difficulty with scleral burns, shrinkage of tissue,  obtaining hemostasis.
+
|
|Is able to  efficiently and precisely apply hemostasis without significant scleral burns,  shrinkage of tissues and obtains hemostasis. Understands advantages and  disadvantages of different types of cautery tips.
+
|
| 
+
|
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|'''COM10'''
 +
|Communicates well with clinical and  non-clinical colleagues
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 
|
 
|
 
 
 
|Application of antimetabolite
 
|Is  unable to accurately describe role of antimetabolites in trabeculectomy,  types of antimetabolites and the relative indication for use of each type,  safety considerations and use of pledget material.
 
| colspan="2" |Is  able to accurately describe role of antimetabolites in trabeculectomy, types  of antimetabolites and the relative indication for use of each type, safety  considerations and use of pledget material. Needs guidance for choice of anti-metabolite and  exposure time. Needs guidance for fashioning of sponges. Inefficient or  inappropriate placement of sponges. Needs to be reminded to keep surgical  count. Does not protect conjunctival edge. Inefficient removal of sponges and  /or irrigation.
 
|Is able to  safely apply antimetabolite onto eye but may have difficulty creating pledget  material to appropriate size and thickness. Appropriately discards materials  into toxic waste and rinses eye of residual antimetabolite material.
 
|Is  able to safely, efficiently and accurately, apply antimetabolite onto eye and has no difficulty  creating pledget material to appropriate size and thickness. Appropriately  discards materials into toxic waste and thoroughly rinses eye of residual  antimetabolite material. Keeps surgical count of pledgets used.
 
 
 
 
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|'''COM11'''
|Creation of scleral flap
 
|Is  unable to describe dissection technique for flap creation.
 
| colspan="2" |Is  able to describe dissection technique for flap creation but requires constant  guidance to perform the basic steps. Needs reminding to grasp sclera outside  flap construction area.
 
|Is able to perform basic flap creation but is inefficient and/or  creates flaps that may be too thin, deep, small, or posterior or at risk of  avulsion.
 
|Is able to efficiently create flap to the appropriate size and  depth without constant guidance.
 
  
Able to describe the complications and management of faulty scleral flap creation including buttonholing and avulsion of the flap.
+
'''COM12'''
| 
+
|The doctor writes notes and dictates letters clearly
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 
|-
 
|-
|8
+
|'''COM14'''
|Paracentesis
+
|Complies with local policies for the approval of leave and makes appropriate arrangements for cover
|Puts anterior lens capsule or iris at risk when entering anterior chamber  Inappropriate incision architecture, location, and size.
+
|
| colspan="2" |Needs  instruction on how to perform. Leakage and/or iris prolapse with local  pressure, provides poor surgical access.
+
|
|Incision  not in correct position or leaks.
+
|
|Incision  parallel to iris, self-sealing, adequate size, provides good access for  surgical maneuvering.
+
|
| 
+
|
 
|-
 
|-
|9 (a)
+
|'''BP10'''
|Sclerostomy (with Kelly  punch)
+
|Has a compassionate approach to patient care
|Has difficulty with entry into anterior chamber, either  ineffective or trauma to ocular tissue. Uncontrolled entry into AC.  Difficulty using Kelly punch.
+
|
| colspan="2" |Is able to create an entry plane into anterior chamber but has  significant difficulty with using Kelly punch. Damages scleral flap. Makes  sclerostomy too large /small or too anterior/posterior for appropriate  filtration.
+
|
|Is  able to use the Kelly punch, but may be prone to creating a shelving wound  with the punch. Makes sclerostomy too large or too  small for appropriate filtration.
+
|
|Is able to create an appropriate entry plane into the anterior  chamber and is able to use Kelly punch with dexterity. Sclerostomy  appropriate size for filtration.
+
|
| 
+
|
 
|-
 
|-
|9 (b)
+
|'''BP11'''
|Sclerostomy (without Kelly punch)
+
|Respects the patient’s wishes when making clinical decisions
|Needs constant direction. Size of sclerostomy inappropriate or  not in correct position
+
|
| colspan="2" |Difficulty outlining and dissecting deep scleral flap. There may  be damage to surrounding tissues.
+
|
|Able to outline deep scleral flap and perform dissection, but  has difficulty performing this smoothly, needs direction, unable to cleanly  remove deeper scleral tissue.
+
|
|Outlines deep scleral flap with ease, dissects flap sclera from  underyling tissue without trauma to other structures, excises deep scleral  flap cleanly. Deep scleral flap/ sclerostomy of appropriate size and  correctly positioned. Avoids damage to the underlying ciliary body.
+
|
| 
+
|
 
|-
 
|-
|10 
+
|'''BP12'''
|Peripheral iridectomy (PI)
+
|Behaves in a considerate and sensitive manner  towards all patients
|Cannot grasp iris tissue, damages surrounding structures.
+
|
| colspan="2" |Needs direction in grasping iris tissue and performing  iridectomy. Unable to control size of PI.
+
|
|Able to grasp iris tissue without damage to intraocular  structures, but PI either too large or too small. May need more than one  attempt
+
|
|Able to grasp iris tissue without damage to surrounding  structures, PI is of correct size.
+
|
| 
+
|
 
|-
 
|-
|11 
+
|'''BP13'''
|Scleral  flap suturing
+
|Shows appropriate empathy with patients
|Instruction  is required and stitches are placed in an awkward, slow fashion with multiple  passes to sclera or tear of flap, bends needles, incomplete suture rotation.
+
|
| colspan="2" |Stitches  are placed with some difficulty, re-suturing may be needed, instruction  needed. Difficulty achieving proper IOP at end of case.
+
|
|Stitches  are placed with minimal difficulty; tight enough to achieve wound  closure and allow for appropriate filtration.
+
|
|Stitches  are placed with correct tension to allow for appropriate filtration. Able to  place both fixed and releasable sutures proficiently. Appropriate final IOP.
+
|
+
|
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 
|-
 
|-
|12 
+
|'''Curricular'''
|Anterior chamber reformation
+
 
|Cannot  cannulate anterior chamber via paracentesis.  Unable to assess whether anterior chamber of appropriate depth. Unable  to assess whether IOP is satisfactory to proceed to next step.
+
'''Codes'''
| colspan="2" |Has  difficulty cannulating anterior chamber via paracentesis to reform anterior  chamber. Needs guidance.
+
|  
|Cannulates anterior chamber with ease to reform anterior  chamber, but has difficulty assessing ideal AC depth/IOP.
+
 
|Cannulates AC with ease and is able to assess correct AC depth/ IOP for eye
+
'''Statement'''
+
|'''They perform to a high standard in this area of practice'''
 +
 
 +
'''(tick)'''
 +
|'''I have no concerns in this area of practice'''
 +
 
 +
(Tick)
 +
|'''I have some'''
 +
 
 +
'''Concerns in this area of practice'''
 +
 
 +
(Tick)
 +
|'''n/a'''
 +
 
 +
(Tick)
 +
|'''Comments*'''
 +
 
 +
'''''(Essential if concerns exist)'''''
 +
 
 +
(Continue overleaf if  necessary)
 
|-
 
|-
|13 
+
|'''BP14'''
|Conjunctival closure
+
|Respects the confidential nature of clinical information obtained from patients
|Is unable to close conjunctiva. Unable to differentiate Tenon’s capsule from conjunctiva.
+
|
| colspan="2" |Is  able to perform basic conjunctival closure technique but is inefficient and  requires significant guidance. Additional sutures are required. Significant  bleb leak at the end of surgery with unstable, shallow anterior chamber. May  have buttonhole of conjunctiva.
+
|
|Is  able to safely close conjunctiva with good tissue approximation but is  inefficient. Requires guidance to ensure closure is effective without a leak.  Placement of additional sutures or replacement of loose sutures required  before closure is complete and Seidel negative.
+
|
|Is able to safely and efficiently close conjunctiva with good  tissue approximation, no bleb leak and stable anterior chamber. Has good  understanding of various suture types, appropriate needles and different  closure techniques.
+
|
| 
+
|
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="8" |'''Global Indices'''
+
|'''BP15'''  
 +
|Works within the limits of her/his clinical  competence
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|'''BP16'''
|Maintaining hemostasis
+
|Seeks help and advice from clinical colleagues  when appropriate
| colspan="2" |Is  unable to describe types of cautery, settings for cautery and/or unable to  describe electrocautery technique.
+
|
|Can  describe techniques for avoiding and controlling bleeding but requires  significant guidance to perform proper cautery to minimize bleeding.
+
|
|Usually  applies proper tissue technique to avoid bleeding and is able to control  bleeding using cautery but requires multiple attempts to cauterize and may  leave burnt carbon marks.
+
|
|Consistently applies proper tissue technique to avoid bleeding  and is able to efficiently control bleeding using cautery.
+
|
| 
+
|
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|'''BP18'''
|Tissue handling
+
|Treats all patients equally, avoiding discrimination
| colspan="2" |Is excessively aggressive or timid  in manipulating tissue. Inadvertent tissue damage occurs to conjunctiva or  sclera. Needs direction to grasp sclera outside margins of intended scleral  flap.
+
|
|Aware of  techniques for avoidance of tissue damage and bleeding but needs supervision  to accomplish proper handling.  Needs  direction to grasp sclera outside margins of intended scleral flap.  Conjunctival buttonholes present.
+
|
|Tissue  handling is safe but sometimes requires multiple attempts to achieve desired  manipulation of tissue.  No direction  required to avoid grasping sclera within margins of intended scleral flap.  Conjunctiva is intact but manipulated aggressively/unsafely e.g. toothed  forceps.
+
|
|Tissue handling is efficient, fluid and almost always achieves  desired tissue manipulation on first attempt. No conjunctival buttonholes  present.
+
|
+
|
|-
 
|3 
 
|Knowledge of  instruments
 
| colspan="2" |Can only identify instruments in simple terms such as “scissors”  and “forceps” but no knowledge of necessary sutures or needle types.
 
|Can identify some but not most of the surgical instruments by  proper names and can identify necessary suture sizes and materials but not  needle types.
 
|Can identify most but not all of the surgical instruments by  proper name and can identify necessary suture sizes/materials but not needle  types.
 
|Can identify all surgical instruments by proper names and can  identify necessary suture sizes/materials and needle types.
 
 
|-
 
|4 
 
|Technique of holding  suture needle in needle holder
 
| colspan="2" |Frequently loads needle incorrectly.
 
|Loads needle in proper direction for a forehand pass but  sometimes loads incorrectly for backhand pass. Loads too close or too far  from the swaged end of the needle.
 
|Loads needle properly for forehand and backhand needle pass but  is inefficient and often requires multiple attempts.
 
|Loads needle properly and efficiently for forehand and backhand  needle passes.
 
 
|-
 
|5 
 
|Technique of surgical  knot tying
 
| colspan="2" |Unable to tie  knots.
 
|Require multiple extra hand maneuvers to make first throw lay  flat and/or loosens first throw while attempting to perform the second throw.
 
|Is able to tie a flat surgeon’s knot first throw but second and  third throws are inefficient. Does not inadvertently loosen the first throw.
 
|Is able to efficiently tie a flat, square surgeon’s knot.
 
 
|-
 
|6  
 
|Communication with surgical team
 
| colspan="2" |Does not know  role of surgical team members. Lacks confidence or has too much. Does not  establish good rapport with team. Unable to request instruments from scrub nurse using proper instrument and suture names  and/or instructions to surgical assistant are vague or nonexistent.
 
|Knows  role of most surgical team members. Lacks confidence. Has difficulty  establishing good rapport with team members. Able  to request most instruments from scrub nurse using proper instrument and  suture names but instructions to surgical assistant are inadequate to perform  procedure safely.
 
|Knows  role of each surgical team member. Is somewhat confident and usually treats  team with respect. Establishes good working relationship. Able to request most instruments from scrub nurse using  proper instrument and suture names in correct order. Instructions to surgical  assistant are adequate for a skilled assistant but inadequate for an  unskilled assistant.
 
|Knows  role of each surgical team member. Is confident and treats team with respect.  Establishes good working relationship. Able to  efficiently request instruments from scrub nurse using proper names in  correct order. Able to consistently give clear instructions to surgical  assistant. Communicates with anesthetist, if present.
 
| 
 
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|'''BP20'''
 +
|Practises according  to the National medical and dental practitioner’s council's guidelines for  doctors
 +
|
 +
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 +
|-
 +
|'''BP24'''
 +
|Prioritizes tasks appropriately, ensuring  urgent and important matters are dealt with promptly
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 7,909: Line 8,293:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|}
+
|-
 
+
|'''BP30'''
 +
|Copes well when under stress
  
Overall difficulty of procedure (circle):           Simple             Intermediate                Difficult
 
  
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|}
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|'''Space for    further comments''' (please    indicate Curricular Code to which comments refer, e.g. “BP10” etc.)
 +
|}
  
Good points: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
+
===== Objectively Structured Assessment Of Technical Skills (OSATS) =====
 +
How a surgical procedure is taught will be determined by the individual trainer and informed by an appropriate training the trainers course (where available). When trainees have the opportunity to perform the procedure themselves they must do so under appropriate supervision. The supervisor will be able to complete an OSATS at the end of the procedure. If there are aspects of the procedure that are not performed satisfactorily the completed OSATS will act as a guide for training and inform the next attempt. Where possible a trainee will arrange to have at '''least 2 satisfactory OSATS''' for each of the Surgical Skills Learning Outcomes.
  
 +
It is expected that several OSATS will be completed and kept in the trainee's portfolio, before the first satisfactory OSATS is achieved for an individual Learning Outcome. It is important that a trainee and trainer understand that this is an important part of training and does not represent a problem with a trainee.
  
Suggestions for development: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________
+
Trainees should also maintain a logbook of surgical and laser procedures performed with reflective comments where appropriate as part of their portfolio.
  
 +
Where appropriate it is useful for initial OSATS to be completed using any simulators that are available e.g. in a wet lab. The OSATS form must make it clear that the assessment has been carried out using a simulator.
  
Agreed action: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
+
The following surgical Learning Outcomes are assessed by OSATS:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Signature of Assessor: ___________________________________        Signature of Trainee: ____________________________________
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.2.8 The COECSA PAEDIATRIC CATARACT-OSCAR
 
 
 
'''The COECSA PAEDIATRIC CATARACT-OSCAR'''
 
 
 
This should be completed at the end of the case and immediately discussed with the student to provide timely, structured, specific performance feedback. Circle the appropriate cells and if previous PAED CAT-OSCARS are available review them in order to develop a plan for improvement
 
  
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="7" |'''COECSA PAEDIATRIC CATARACT SURGERY-Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubric (COECSA PAED CAT-OSCAR)'''  
+
|'''WpBA'''
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Learning Outcome (LO)'''
 +
|'''Target Year (TYA)*'''
 +
|'''Comments'''
 +
|-
 +
|'''OSATS2'''
 +
|SS2
 +
|Operating microscope
 +
|1
 +
|This LO can be  assessed by a senior resident (year   3  or 4)
 +
|-
 +
|'''OSATS3'''
 +
|SS3
 +
|Aseptic  technique
 +
|1
 +
|This LO can be  assessed by an appropriately trained theatre nurse
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |Date ______
+
|'''OSATS1'''
 +
|SS1
 +
|Microsurgical  skills
 +
|2
 +
| rowspan="3" |
  
Resident ___________
 
  
Evaluator __________
 
|Novice 
 
  
(score = 2)
+
OSATS after initial TYA should reflect an increase in complexity of cases
|Beginner 
+
|-
 
+
|'''OSATS1'''
(score  = 3)
+
|SS7
|Advanced  Beginner
+
|Lid surgery
 
+
(score  = 4)
+
|-
|Competent 
+
|'''OSATS1'''
 
+
|SS4
(score = 5)
+
|Cataract surgery
|Not applicable. Done by consultant or senior resident (score= 0)
+
 +
|-
 +
|'''OSATS1'''
 +
|SS11
 +
|Temporal artery biopsy
 +
|2
 +
|
 
|-
 
|-
|1
+
|'''OSATS1'''
|Draping:
+
|SS5
|Unable  to start draping without help.
+
|Procedures to  lower IOP
|Drapes  with minimal verbal instruction. Incomplete lash coverage.
+
|¾
|Lashes mostly covered, drape at most minimally obstructing view.
 
|Lashes  completely covered and clear of incision site, drape not obstructing the  view.
 
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|'''OSATS1'''
 +
|SS6
 +
|Ocular and  adnexal trauma
 
|2
 
|2
|Incision (corneal or corneo-scleral) &Paracentesis: Formation&  Technique
 
|Inappropriate  incision architecture, location, and size.
 
|Leakage  and/or iris prolapse with local pressure, provides poor surgical access to  and visibility of capsule and bag.
 
|Incision  either valvular or of good internal length not both.
 
|Incision  parallel to iris, valvular and of good internal length provides good access  for surgical maneuvering.
 
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|'''OSATS1'''
 +
|SS8
 +
|Ocular surface  protection
 +
|1
 
|
 
|
 +
|-
 +
|'''OSATS1'''
 +
|SS9
 +
|Lateral  canthotomy/cantholysis
 +
|2
 
|
 
|
 
+
|-
 
+
|'''OSATS1'''
Staining of the anterior capsule
+
|SS10
|Unsure  about the technique of injecting 0.1%Trypan Blue dye, the amount to be  injected and the waiting time before washing off the dye to stain the  anterior capsule.
+
|Biopsy ocular and adnexal tissue
|Knows  the technique but requires instruction on injecting, waiting time. Anterior  chamber fluctuates while injecting the dye. Does not use sterile air to  protect the corneal endothelium. Administers incorrect amount or washes off  the dye too quickly.
+
|2
|Requires no instruction. Uses  adequate sterile air bubble to protect the corneal endothelium. Administers adequate amount and waits for adequate time.  Washes off the dye with saline a little too early causing improper and  patchy staining of the capsule. May cause endothelial staining due to excess  trypan or inadequate air bubble.
 
|Administers  adequate amount. . Uses adequate sterile air bubble to protect the corneal  endothelium Waits for one minute and or wait for the dye to stain the  anterior capsule uniformly and then washes away the dye with saline. The  anterior chamber remains stable during the whole process. There is no  staining of the corneal endothelium.
 
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|4
+
|'''OSATS1'''
|Viscoelastic:
+
|SS12
 
+
|Extraocular  muscle surgery
Appropriate Use and Safe Insertion  
+
|Unsure of when, what type and how much  OVDto use. Has difficulty accessing anterior chamber through paracentesis.  
+
|
 +
|-
 +
|'''OSATS1'''
 +
|SS13
 +
|Removal of the  eye
 +
|2
 +
|This LO can be assessed by a senior resident (year   3  or 4)
 +
|-
 +
|'''OSATS1'''
 +
|SS17
 +
|Anterior Vitrectomy
 +
 +
|
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<nowiki>*</nowiki> The TYA represents the latest year that a trainee must achieve the specified LO. Trainees are encouraged to seek assessment using OSATS when an opportunity arises and not wait until the target year.
 +
 
 +
===== The COECSA MSICS-OSCAR =====
 +
 
 +
'''The COECSA MSICS-OSCAR'''
 +
 
 +
This should be completed at the end of the case and immediately discussed with the student to provide timely, structured, specific performance feedback. Circle the appropriate cells and if previous MSICS-OSCARS are available review them in order to develop a plan for improvement
  
.
+
{| class="wikitable"
|Requires minimal instruction. Knows when to  use but administers incorrect amount or type.
+
| colspan="7" |''' ''' '''COECSA Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery -Ophthalmology Surgical  Competency Assessment Rubric: (COECSA MSICS-OSCAR)'''
|Requires no instruction. Uses at  appropriate time. Administers adequate amount and type. Cannula tip in good  position. Unsure of correct OVD if multiple types available.
 
|OVDs are administered in appropriate amount  and at the appropriate time with cannula tip clear of lens capsule and  endothelium. Appropriate OVDs used if multiple types of OVD are available.
 
|   
 
 
|-
 
|-
|5
+
| colspan="2" |Date ___________
|Anterior Capsulorrhexis: Commencement of Flap& follow-through.
+
 
|With Forceps: Instruction required,  tentative, chases rather than controls rhexis, lens matter disruption may  occur.
 
  
With Vitrector: Instruction required for  initiation of capsulorrhexis, unsure of vitrectomy settings, anterior chamber  (AC) fluctuates frequently.
+
Resident _______
|With Forceps: Minimal instruction,  predominantly in control with occasional loss of control of rhexis, lens  matter disruption may occur.
 
  
With Vitrector: Minimal instruction needed,  has knowledge of machine settings for capsulotomy, AC is stable throughout.
 
|With Forceps: In control, few awkward or  repositioning movements, no lens matter disruption.
 
  
With Vitrector:  In control, No lens matter disruption or AC fluctuation, Few awkward movements noticed.
+
Evaluator _______
|With Forceps: Delicate approach and  confident control of the rhexis, no lens matter disruption.
+
|Novice
  
With Vitrector:  Has a sound knowledge of vitrector machine  settings for capsulotomy, well controlled initiation and completion of  rhexis.
+
(score = 2)
| 
+
|Beginner
|-
 
|6
 
|Anterior  Capsulorrhexis:
 
  
Formation and Circular Completion
+
(score = 3)
|With Forceps or vitrector: Size and  position are inadequate for a paediatric cataract.
+
|Advanced Beginner
|With Forceps or vitrector: Size and  position are barely adequate, difficulty achieving circular rhexis, tear may  occur.
 
|With Forceps or vitrector: Size and  position are almost exact, shows control, and requires only minimal  instruction. Nearly all of the optic edge covered by the capsule edge.
 
|With Forceps or vitrector: Adequate size (5-6  mm) and position for paediatric cataract, no tears, rapid, unaided control of  radialization, maintains control of the flap and AC depth throughout the  capsulorrhexis.
 
|
 
  
 +
(score = 4)
 +
|Competent
  
 +
(score = 5)
 +
|Not  applicable. Done by consultant or senior resident (score= 0)
 
|-
 
|-
|7
+
|1  
|Hydrodissection:  
+
|Draping:
|Hydrodissection fluid not injected in  sufficient quantity or place to achieve desired displacement of the soft nucleus. Unaware of contraindications to hydrodissection such as posterior polar  cataract or a suspected pre-existing posterior capsule dehiscence.  
+
|Unable to  start draping without help.
|Multiple attempts required to achieve the desired displacement of the soft nucleus.  
+
|Drapes with minimal verbal instruction. Incomplete lash coverage.
|Fluid injected in appropriate location, has  sound knowledge of contraindications to hydrodissection.  
+
|Lashes  mostly covered, drape at most minimally obstructing view.
|Adequate if free nuclear rotation with minimal resistance is achieved or adequate separation of nucleus and epinucleus  from the cortex is obtained. Aware of contraindications to hydrodissection.
+
|Lashes completely covered and clear of incision site, drape not obstructing view.
| 
+
|
 
|-
 
|-
|8(a)
+
|2
|Aspiration Probe and Second Instrument: Insertion Into Eye
+
|Scleral access &  Cauterization
|Has great difficulty inserting the probe or second instrument, AC collapses, may damage wound, capsule or Descemet’s membrane
+
|Unable to successfully access sclera. Cauterization insufficient or excessive both in intensity and localization.
|Inserts the probe or second  instrument after some failed attempts, may damage wound, capsule or Descemet’s membrane.
+
|Accesses sclera but with  difficulty and hesitation. Cauterization  insufficient or excessive in location or intensity.  
|Inserts probe and second instrument on first attempt with mild difficulty, no damage to wound, capsule or Descemet’s membrane.
+
|Achieves good scleral access with mild difficulty. Adequate cauterization.
|Smoothly inserts instruments into the eye without damaging the wound or Descemet's membrane.
+
|Precisely and deftly accesses sclera. Appropriate and precise cauterization.
| 
+
|
 
|-
 
|-
|8(b)
+
|3
|Aspiration Probe and Second Instrument: Effective Use and  Stability
+
|Sclerocorneal Tunnel 
|Tip frequently not visible, has much difficulty keeping the eye in primary position and uses excessive  force to do so.
+
|Inappropriate incision  depth, location, and size, hesitant dissection. Iris prolapse may occur
|Tip often not visible, often requires manipulation to keep eye in primary position.
+
|One of the following  correct: incision depth, location or size.  Able to dissect forward but not  able to perceive depth
 
+
|Two of the following are correct: incision depth, location or size. Understands that  tunnel depth is incorrect but unable to correct.  
 
+
|Good incision depth, location and size. Tunnel constructed at right plane, if inappropriate planeable to rectify.  
|Maintains visibility of tip at most times, eye is generally kept in primary position with mild  depression or pulling on the globe.
 
|Maintains visibility of instrument tips at all times, keeps the eye in primary position without depressing or pulling up the globe.
 
 
|   
 
|   
 
|-
 
|-
|9
+
|4
 +
|Corneal entry
 +
|Hesitant  keratome entry into AC. Unable to extend the internal valve. Significant  shallowing of anterior chamber. Require wound extension or suturing.
 +
|Enters  into AC but difficulty in extension. Follows a different plane. Entry either  anterior or posterior to dissection site. Mild AC shallowing. Require wound  extension or suturing.
 +
|Entry at  right plane. Able to extend but with repeated use of viscoelastic. Internal  valve irregular. Require wound extension or suturing.
 +
|Fluently  enters in right plane. Wound length adequate with no further need for  extension. Retains viscoelastic during extension. Self-sealing, provides good  access for surgical maneuvering.
 
|
 
|
 +
|-
 +
|5
 +
|Paracentesis & Viscoelastic  insertion
 +
|Chamber  collapses on performing paracentesis. Inappropriate width, length and  location. Pierces anterior capsule on entry.
  
 +
Unsure of  when, what type and how much viscoelastic to use. Has difficulty accessing  anterior chamber through paracentesis.
 +
|Appropriate  incision width, location or length. Anterior chamber shallows mildly.  Requires minimal instruction. Knows when to use but administers incorrect  amount or type of viscoelastic.
 +
|Inappropriate  location, width or length. Anterior chamber almost stable
  
Management of Lens: Aspiration Technique
+
Requires no instruction. Administers viscoelastic at appropriate time, amount, type,  and cannula position.  
|Great difficulty in aspirating the nucleus, introducing the tip under the capsulorrhexis border, position of aspiration hole not controlled, cannot regulate aspiration flow as needed, cannot peel cortical material adequately, and engages capsule or  iris with aspiration port.
+
|Wound of adequate length, width, and correct location. Viscoelastics administered in  appropriate amount, at appropriate time, with cannula tip clear of lens capsule and endothelium.
|Moderate difficulty  introducing aspiration tip under capsulorrhexis and maintaining hole up position, attempts to aspirate without occluding tip, shows poor  comprehension of aspiration dynamics, cortical peeling is not well  controlled, jerky and slow, capsule potentially compromised. Prolonged  attempts result in minimal residual cortical material.
 
|Minimal difficulty introducing  the aspiration tip under the capsulorrhexis, aspiration hole usually up, cortex well engaged for 360 degrees, cortical peeling slow, few technical  errors, minimal residual cortical material.
 
|Aspiration tip is introduced  into the nucleus to aspirate and then under the free border of the  capsulorrhexis in irrigation mode with the aspiration hole up, Aspiration is  activated in just enough flow as to occlude the tip, efficiently removes all  cortex, The cortical material is peeled gently towards the center of the pupil, tangentially in cases of zonular weakness
 
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|10
+
|6
 +
|Capsulorrhexis:  Commencement of Flap & follow-through.
 +
|Instruction  required, tentative, chases rather than controls rhexis, cortex disruption  may occur.
 +
|Minimal  instruction, occasional loss of control of rhexis, cortex disruption may  occur.
 +
|In  control, few awkward or repositioning movements, no cortex disruption.
 +
|Delicate  approach and confident control of the rhexis, no cortex disruption.
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|7
 +
|Capsulorrhexis: Formation and  Circular Completion
 +
|Size and  position are inadequate for nucleus density, tear may occur.
 +
|Size and  position are barely adequate for nucleus density, difficulty achieving  circular rhexis, tear may occur.
 +
|Size and  position are almost exact for nucleus density, shows control, and requires  only minimal instruction.
 +
|Adequate  size and position for nucleus density, no tears, rapid, unaided control of  radialization, maintains control of the flap and AC depth throughout the  capsulorrhexis.
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|8
 +
|Hydrodissection:  Visible Fluid Wave and Free prolapse of one pole of nucleus
 +
|Hydrodissection  fluid not injected in quantity or place to achieve nucleus rotation or  prolapse.
 +
|Multiple  attempts required, able to prolapse nuclear pole after multiple efforts.  Manually forces nucleus prolapse before adequate hydrodissection; cheese  wiring.
 +
|Fluid  injected in appropriate location, able to prolapse one pole of nucleus but  encounters more than minimal resistance.
 +
|Ideally  see free fluid wave, adequate for free nuclear hydroprolapse or mechanical  prolapse with minimal resistance. Aware of contraindications to  hydrodissection.
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|9
 +
|Prolapse of nucleus completely  into AC
 +
|Unable to  dial nucleus into AC. Hooks anterior or posterior nuclear surface, nucleus  rotates in the bag, iris and corneal touch, pupillary constriction, may  damage capsule or zonules.
 +
|Prolapses  nucleus after repeated awkward attempts, needs instruction, churns cortex  causing reduced visibility; iris or corneal touch; no damage to capsule or  zonules.
 +
|Prolapses  nucleus into AC with more than minimal resistance. No corneal touch.
 +
|Prolapse  with minimal resistance. No damage to pupil and iris.
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|10
 +
|Nucleus extraction
 +
|Damages  endothelium, iris or capsule, unable to hold and extract nucleus, movements  not coordinated.
 +
|Movements  coordinated but unable to extract nucleus, iris or corneal damage, unable to  assess wound size in relation to nuclear density.
 +
|Removes  nucleus after repeated attempts, more than one piece, might need wound extension  prior to extraction.
 +
|Extracts  nucleus with one or two attempts; proper wound size in relation to nuclear  density.
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|11
 +
|Irrigation and Aspiration  Technique with Adequate Removal of Cortex
 +
|Great  difficulty introducing the aspiration tip under the capsulorrhexis border,  aspiration hole position not controlled, cannot regulate aspiration flow as  needed, cannot peel cortical material adequately, engages capsule or iris  with aspiration port.
 +
|Moderate  difficulty introducing aspiration tip under capsulorrhexis and maintaining  hole up position, attempts to aspirate without occluding tip, shows poor  comprehension of aspiration dynamics, cortical peeling is not well  controlled, jerky and slow, capsule potentially compromised. Prolonged  attempts result in minimal residual cortical material.
 +
|Minimal  difficulty introducing the aspiration tip under the capsulorrhexis,  aspiration hole usually up, cortex will engaged for 360 degrees, cortical  peeling slow, few technical errors, minimal residual cortical material. Some  difficulty in removing sub incisional cortex
 +
|Aspiration  tip is introduced under the free border of the capsulorrhexis in irrigation  mode with the aspiration hole up, Aspiration is activated in just enough  flow as to occlude the tip, efficiently removes all cortex. The cortical  material is peeled gently towards the center of the pupil, tangentially in  cases of zonular weakness. No difficulty in removing subincisional cortex
 
|
 
|
  
  
Primary Posterior Capsulorrhexis (PPC) initiation
 
|Tentative, needs  instructions, unable to clearly visualize the posterior capsule.
 
  
 +
|-
 +
|12
 +
|Lens Insertion,  Rotation, and Final Position of Intraocular Lens
  
'''With Forceps:''' Not  sure if a nick has been made in the posterior capsule. Unable to grasp the  lifted posterior capsule with forceps.
 
  
  
'''With Vitrector:''' Struggles  while making a sclerotomy site and inserting the irrigating cannula, Anterior  chamber (AC) keeps fluctuating. Wrong site for initiating posterior capsulotomy. 
 
|Requires minimal instructions
 
  
  
'''With Forceps:''' Able to clearly appreciate the posterior capsule and nick made with a cystitome and initiate PPC, moderate vitreous disturbance. Able to grasp the posterior capsule with minimal difficulty.  
+
|Unable to insert IOL.
 
+
|Difficult insertion,  manipulation of IOL, rough handling, unstable anterior chamber. Repeated hesitant attempts placing lower haptic in capsule, repeated attempts rotate upper haptic d  into place with  excessive force.
 
+
|Insertion and manipulation  of IOL accomplished with minimal anterior chamber instability, the lower haptic is placed with some difficulty, upper haptic is rotated with some  stress.  
'''With Vitrector:''' Needs minimal instructions while deciding the site and technique of sclerotomy, AC remains stable. Site of initiating the capsulotomy is correct.   
+
|Insertion and manipulation of IOL is performed in a deep, and stable anterior chamber and capsular bag, with incision appropriate for implant type.  The lower haptic is  smoothly placed inside the capsular bag; the upper haptic is rotated or  gently bent and inserted into  place without  exerting excessive stress to the capsulorrhexis or the zonule fibers.
|'''With Forceps:''' In control, few awkward movements while making the nick and trying to grasp the posterior capsule, no vitreous disruption.
+
|
 
+
|-
 
+
|13
'''With Vitrector:''' Performs proper sclerotomy and inserts infusion cannula with ease, AC does not fluctuate, visualizes the vitrector probe in the centre before starting capsulotomy, requires minimal instructions for initiating capsulotomy.  
+
|Wound Closure (Including Suturing, Hydration, and Checking Security as Required)
|'''With Forceps:''' Able to grasp the posterior capsule with ease and at will. Delicate approach and confident control of the rhexis, no vitreous disruption.  
+
|If suturing is needed, instruction  is required and stitches are placed in an awkward, slow fashion with much difficulty, astigmatism, bent needles, incomplete suture rotation and wound  leakage may result, unable to remove viscoelastics thoroughly. unable to make incision watertight or does not check wound for seal.  Improper final IOP.
 
+
|If  suturing is needed, stitches are placed with some difficulty, resuturing may be needed, questionable wound closure with probable astigmatism, instruction may be needed, questionable whether all viscoelastics are thoroughly removed, Extra maneuvers are required to make the incision water tight at the end of the surgery. May have improper IOP.
'''With Vitrector:''' Understands the difference in surgical anatomy of pars plana for age, makes a proper sclerotomy at the desired distance with an MVR blade, properly places the infusion port to maintain the AC, Starts posterior capsulotomy from the  centre.
+
|If  suturing is needed, stitches are placed with minimal difficulty tight  enough to maintain the wound closed, may have slight astigmatism, viscoelastics are adequately removed after this step with some difficulty,  The incision is checked and is water tight or needs minimal adjustment at the end of the surgery. May have improper IOP.
 +
|If suturing is needed, stitches are placed tight enough to maintain the wound  closed, but not too tight as to induce astigmatism, viscoelastics are thoroughly removed after this step, the incision is checked and is water tight at the end of the surgery.  Proper final IOP.
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
|11
 
 
|
 
|
 
+
| colspan="2" |'''Global Indices'''
 
 
Primary Posterior Capsulorrhexis(PPC) formation and completion
 
|'''With Forceps:''' Poor  control when proceeding with the capsulotomy. Vitreous disturbance occurs.  Inadequate size and position of PPC.
 
 
 
 
 
'''With Vitrector:''' Does  not have knowledge of machine settings while performing capsulotomy and  vitrectomy. Improper technique and inadequate size of capsulotomy. Peripheral  extension of posterior capsular tear may occur.
 
|'''With Forceps:'''  predominantly in control with occasional loss of control of rhexis. Size and  position are barely adequate, difficulty achieving circular rhexis, tear may  occur.
 
 
 
 
 
'''With Vitrector:'''  Moderate difficulty in performing capsulotomy and vitrectomy, unable to  decide if size of capsulotomy is adequate. Knowledge on machine settings not  complete. Difficulty in achieving circular rhexis and may cause peripheral  tears.
 
|'''With Forceps:''' Able to proceed and complete capsulotomy with minimal instructions. Size and position are almost  exact, shows good control. Needs minimal instructions if capsulotomy starts  extending peripherally. Able to use appropriate OVD to help facilitate PPC at  appropriate stage
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
'''With Vitrector:''' Able  to perform adequate capsulotomy with ease. Has a sound knowledge on the  change in settings while performing capsulotomy. Needs minimal instructions  if capsulotomy starts extending peripherally. 
 
|'''With Forceps:''' Adequate size and  position for age, no tears, rapid, unaided control of radialization,  maintains control throughout. Able to manage independently if posterior  capsulotomy starts extending peripherally. Able to use appropriate OVD to help  facilitate PPC at appropriate stage
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
'''With Vitrector:'''  Adequate size (4-5 mm) and position for age, no tears. Has a sound knowledge  on the change in settings while performing capsulotomy. Able to manage  independently if posterior capsulotomy starts extending peripherally.
 
 
|
 
|
|-
 
|12
 
 
|
 
|
 
 
 
Anterior Vitrectomy
 
|Needs Instruction, Difficulty  in appreciating vitreous in anterior chamber or the bag, Technique of holding  the bimanual irrigation cannula and vitrector is wrong, not sure of settings  for vitrectomy. May cut the posterior capsule inadvertently.
 
|Requires minimal  instructions, holds the vitrector properly, minimal fluctuation in the  anterior chamber during vitrectomy, able to appreciate the presence of  vitreous. Unable to perform complete vitrectomy, stays too anterior in  vitreous cavity. May cut the posterior capsule inadvertently.
 
|Performs anterior vitrectomy  with control, able to clear the anterior and posterior chamber free of  vitreous but unable to judge if adequate vitrectomy has been performed, maintains  the anterior chamber during vitrectomy. Maintains the posterior  Capsulorrhexis margins intact. Peaking of posterior capsule due to inadequate  vitrectomy may be noted.
 
|Knows the goals of performing  anterior vitrectomy in paediatric age.  Knows the end point of complete anterior vitrectomy, Anterior and  posterior chamber completely cleared of vitreous, adequate depth of  vitrectomy performed in vitreous cavity all around the posterior  Capsulorrhexis. Maintains the anterior chamber throughout.
 
 
|
 
|
|-
 
|13
 
 
|
 
|
 
 
 
IOL Insertion, Rotation, and Final Position of Intraocular  Lens
 
|Unable to insert IOL, unable to  produce adequate incision for implant '''FOLDABLE:  ''' unable to load IOL into injector or forceps, no control of lens  injection, doesn't control tip  placement, lens is not in the capsular bag or is injected upside down.
 
|Insertion and manipulation of  IOL is difficult, eye handled roughly, anterior chamber not stable, repeated attempts result in borderline incision for implant  type '''FOLDABLE:'''  difficulty loading IOL into  injector or forceps, hesitant, poor control  of lens injection, difficulty  controlling tip placement, excessive manipulation required to get both  haptics into capsular bag.
 
|Insertion and manipulation of  IOL is accomplished with minimal anterior chamber instability, incision just adequate for implant '''FOLDABLE:'''  minimal difficulty  loading IOL into injector of forceps, hesitant but good control of lens  injection, minimal difficulty  controlling tip placement,  both haptics are in the capsular bag.
 
|Insertion and manipulation of IOL is performed in a deep and  stable anterior chamber and capsular bag, with incision appropriate for  implant type. '''FOLDABLE''': Able  to load IOL into injector or forceps, lens is injected in a controlled  fashion, fixation of IOL is symmetric; the optic and both haptics are inside  the capsular bag.
 
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|14
 
|14
|Wound Closure (Including Suturing, Hydration, and Checking Security as Required)
+
|Wound Neutrality and Minimizing Eye Rolling and Corneal Distortion
|When suturing is needed, instruction is required and stitches  are placed in an awkward, slow fashion with much difficulty, astigmatism, bent needles, incomplete suture rotation and wound leakage may result,  unable to remove OVDs thoroughly. Unable to make incision water tight or does not check wound for seal.  Improper  final chamber depth IOP
+
|Nearly constant eye movement and corneal distortion.
|When suturing is needed, stitches are placed with some difficulty, resuturing may be needed, questionable wound closure with probable astigmatism, instruction may be needed, questionable whether all viscoelastics are thoroughly removed, Extra manoeuvres are  required to make the incision water tight at the end of the surgery.  May have improper IOP.
+
|Eye often not in primary position, frequent distortion folds.
|When suturing is needed,  stitches are placed with minimal difficulty tight enough to maintain the  wound closed, may have slight astigmatism, viscoelastics are adequately  removed after this step with some difficulty, The incision is checked and is  water tight or needs minimal adjustment at the end of the surgery.  May have improper IOP.
+
|Eye usually in primary position, mild corneal distortion folds occur.
|When suturing is needed, stitches are  placed tight enough to maintain the wound closed, but not too tight as to  induce astigmatism, OVDs are adequately removed, and the incision is checked and is water tight at the end of the surgery.  Proper final IOP.
+
|The eye is  kept in primary position during the surgery. No distortion folds are produced. The length and location of incisions prevents distortion of the  cornea.
| 
+
|
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="7" |'''Global Indices'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|15
 
|15
|Wound Neutrality and minimizing Eye Rolling and Corneal Distortion
+
|Eye Positioned Centrally Within Microscope View
|Nearly constant eye movement and corneal distortion.  
+
|Constantly requires repositioning.
|Eye often not in primary position, frequent distortion folds.  
+
|Occasional repositioning required.
|Eye usually in primary position, mild  corneal distortion folds occur.  
+
|Mild  fluctuation in pupil position.
|The eye is kept in primary position during the surgery. No distortion folds are produced. The length and location of  incisions prevents distortion of the cornea.  
+
|The pupil  is kept centered during the surgery.
| 
+
|
 
|-
 
|-
 
|16
 
|16
|Use of dilating agents and devices
+
|Conjunctival and Corneal Tissue  Handling
|Does not have knowledge of dilating agents or devices
+
|Tissue handling is rough and damage occurs.
|Has a good knowledge of dilating agents or devices but unsure of dose and technique.
+
|Tissue handling borderline, minimal damage occurs.
|Has adequate knowledge of dilating agents, of dose and devices but needs minimal instructions while usage
+
|Tissue handling decent but potential for damage exists.
|Has adequate knowledge of dilating agents, of dose and devices. Needs no instructions while performing the technique.  
+
|Tissue is not damaged nor at risk by handling.
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
 
|17
 
|17
|Eye Positioned Centrally Within Microscope View
+
|Intraocular Spatial Awareness
|Constantly requires repositioning.  
+
|Instruments often in contact with capsule,  iris, corneal endothelium; blunt second instrument not kept in appropriate position.
|Occasional repositioning required.  
+
|Occasional contact  with capsule, iris, corneal endothelium; sometimes has blunt second  instrument in appropriate position.
|Mild fluctuation in pupil position.  
+
|Rare contact with  capsule, iris, endothelium. Often has blunt second hand instrument in appropriate position.
|The pupil is kept centered during the  surgery.  
+
|No  accidental contact  with capsule, iris, corneal endothelium. Blunt, second hand  instrument, is kept in appropriate position.
| 
+
|
 
|-
 
|-
 
|18
 
|18
|Conjunctival and corneal Tissue Handling
+
|Iris  Protection
|Tissue handling is rough and damage occurs.
+
|Iris  constantly at risk, handled roughly.
|Tissue handling borderline, minimal damage occurs.  
+
|Iris  occasionally at risk. Needs help in deciding when and how to use hooks, ring or other methods of iris protection.
|Tissue handling decent but potential for damage exists.  
+
|Iris  generally well protected. Slight difficulty with iris hooks, ring or other methods of iris protection.
|Tissue is not damaged nor at risk by handling.  
+
|Iris is  uninjured. Iris hooks, ring, or other methods are used as needed to  protect the iris.
| 
+
|
 
|-
 
|-
 
|19
 
|19
|Intraocular  Spatial Awareness
+
|Overall Speed and Fluidity of Procedure
|Instruments often in contact with capsule, iris and corneal endothelium''''','''''
+
|Hesitant, frequent starts and stops, not at all fluid.
|Occasional accidental contact with  capsule, iris and corneal endothelium.
+
|Occasional starts and stops, inefficient and unnecessary manipulations common, case duration about 60 minutes.
|Rare accidental contact with capsule, iris and corneal endothelium
+
|Occasional inefficient and/or unnecessary manipulations occur, case duration about 45 minutes.
|No accidental contact with capsule, iris and corneal  endothelium, when appropriate,
+
|Inefficient and/or unnecessary manipulations are avoided, case duration is appropriate for case difficulty. In general, 30 minutes should be adequate.
+
|
|-
+
|}
|20
 
|Iris Protection
 
|Iris constantly at risk, handled roughly.
 
|Iris occasionally at risk. Needs help in  deciding when and how to use hooks, ring or other methods of iris protection. 
 
|Iris generally well protected. Slight  difficulty with iris hooks, ring, or other methods of iris protection.
 
|Iris is uninjured. Iris hooks, ring,  or other methods are used as needed to protect the iris.
 
 
|-
 
|21
 
|Overall Speed and Fluidity of Procedure
 
|Hesitant, frequent starts and stops, not at all fluid.  
 
|Occasional starts and stops, inefficient and unnecessary manipulations common, case duration about 60 minutes.  
 
|Occasional inefficient and/or unnecessary manipulations occur, case duration about 45 minutes.  
 
|Inefficient and/or unnecessary manipulations are avoided, case duration is appropriate for case difficulty. In general, 30 minutes should be adequate.
 
 
|-
 
|22
 
|Communication with surgical team
 
|Does not know  role of surgical team members. Lacks confidence or has too much. Does not  establish good rapport with team. Unable to request instruments from scrub nurse using proper instrument and suture names  and/or instructions to surgical assistant are vague or nonexistent.
 
|Knows  role of most surgical team members. Lacks confidence. Has difficulty  establishing good rapport with team members. Able to  request most instruments from scrub nurse using proper instrument and suture  names but instructions to surgical assistant are inadequate to perform  procedure safely.
 
|Knows  role of each surgical team member. Is somewhat confident and usually treats  team with respect. Establishes good working relationship. Able to request most instruments from scrub nurse using  proper instrument and suture names in correct order. Instructions to surgical  assistant are adequate for a skilled assistant but inadequate for an  unskilled assistant.
 
|Knows  role of each surgical team member. Is confident and treats team with respect.  Establishes good working relationship. Able to  efficiently request instruments from scrub nurse using proper names in  correct order. Able to consistently give clear instructions to surgical  assistant.
 
|
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
 
Overall difficulty of procedure (circle):           Simple             Intermediate                Difficult
 
Overall difficulty of procedure (circle):           Simple             Intermediate                Difficult
  
Line 8,221: Line 8,621:
 
Good points: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 
Good points: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
  
Suggestions for development: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________
+
Suggestions for development: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
  
Agreed action: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
+
Agreed action: ­­­­­­
  
  
Signature of Assessor: ___________________________________        Signature of Trainee: ____________________________________
 
  
 +
Signature of Assessor: __________________________________        Signature of Trainee: ____________________________________
  
 +
===== '''The COECSA TRAB-OSCAR''' =====
 +
This should be completed at the end of the case and immediately discussed with the student to provide timely, structured, specific performance feedback. Circle the appropriate cells and if previous MSICS-OSCARS are available review them in order to develop a plan for improvement
  
  
 +
'''COECSA Trabeculectomy-Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubric (COECSATRAB-OSCAR)'''
  
5.2.9 The COECSA STRABISMUS-OSCAR
 
  
'''The COECSA STRABISMUS-OSCAR'''
+
Resident: __________________  Assessor: ____________________         Year of Training:  __________    Date: ____________
  
This should be completed at the end of the case and immediately discussed with the student to provide timely, structured, specific performance feedback. Circle the appropriate cells and if previous STARBISMUS-OSCARS are available review them in order to develop a plan for improvement
+
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="2" |
  
'''COECSA Strabismus -Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubric: (COECSA STRABISMUS-OSCAR)'''
 
  
Resident: __________________  Evaluator: ____________________                     Date: ____________
+
Surgical Step
{| class="wikitable"
 
|
 
 
|
 
|
  
  
 +
Novice
  
 +
(score = 2)
 +
| colspan="2" |
  
Surgical Step
 
|Novice
 
  
(score = 2)
+
Beginner
|Beginner
 
  
 
(score = 3)
 
(score = 3)
|Advanced Beginner
+
|
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Advanced Beginner
  
 
(score = 4)
 
(score = 4)
|Competent
+
|
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Competent
  
 
(score = 5)
 
(score = 5)
|Not applicable. Done by consultant or senior resident (score= 0)
+
|Not applicable. Done by consultant or senior resident (score= 0)
 
|-
 
|-
|1  
+
|1  
|Draping
+
|Universal  precautions
|Is unable to prepare or drape the patient using sterile technique without instruction. Unaware of importance of identifying correct eye and muscle prior to draping.
+
|Has not heard of universal precautions.
|Is able to prepare and drape the patient but sterile technique is inconsistent. Difficulty attaining proper head position.
+
| colspan="2" |Aware of time-out process but not confident to perform. May perform with guidance/ prompting, but misses some information.
|Is able to consistently prepare and drape patients using sterile technique however steps  are performed inefficiently. Attains proper head position.
+
|Able  to perform team time-out but needs prompting to do so.
|Is able to consistently and efficiently prepare and drape patients with appropriate head position.
+
|Independently  initiates team time-out at beginning of case, identifies correct patient, procedure and side. Team members have been introduced. Alerts / allergies noted.
|
+
| 
 
|-
 
|-
|2
+
|2
|Forced  duction test
+
|Draping and placement of speculum
|Is unaware of forced duction testing for muscle restriction.
+
|Unable to start draping without help.
|Is familiar with the  test but is unaware of its relevance, timing and is unable to perform it.
+
| colspan="2" |Drapes  with minimal verbal instruction. Incomplete lash coverage.
|Is able to state the purpose of the test and is able to perform the test at the appropriate  time(s) and detect moderate to severe restriction.
+
|Lashes mostly covered, drape at most minimally obstructing view.  Attains proper head position.
|When appropriate, is able to consistently detect and describe all degrees of rectus muscle restriction and comment on relevance to  surgical options.
+
|Lashes  completely covered and clear of incision site, drape not obstructing view.
|
+
| 
 
|-
 
|-
|3
+
|3
|Globe stabilization
+
|Corneal Traction Suture
|Is able to describe one method of globe stabilization  but is unable to perform it.
+
|Unable to describe purpose and method of inserting corneal traction suture.
|Is able to describe one method of globe stabilization but needs assistance to perform it.
+
| colspan="2" |Difficulty loading needle, needs instruction for correct needle placement and completion  of suture placement.
|Is able to perform one method of globe stabilization with minimal verbal supervision.
+
|Able to load and handle needle  appropriately. Some difficulty in finding correct depth of suture, needs instruction, needle track too deep or too shallow or bite not of ideal size.
|Is able to perform one method of globe stabilization without verbal supervision and with ease.
+
|Is able to consistently perform the step with the appropriate length of bite, depth of  suture and achieve the desired rotation of the eye for exposure.
|
+
| 
 
|-
 
|-
|4
+
|4  
|Conjunctival incision & Tenon’s dissection
+
|Conjunctival incision and dissection
|Is unable to describe limbal or fornix conjunctival incision for rectus muscle surgery.
+
|Is able to describe but not able to perform limbal or fornix conjunctival incision for trabeculectomy surgery.
|Is able to describe but not able to perform limbal or fornix conjunctival incision for rectus muscle surgery.
+
| colspan="2" |Is able to perform limbal or fornix conjunctival incision but is inefficient and  requires guidance.  Has difficulty with  judging appropriate length of incision, dissection down to sclera of both  conjunctiva and Tenon’s and the necessary force to apply to the tissue.  Has difficulty avoiding damage to the  superior rectus muscle with limbal-based conjunctival flap.
|Is able to perform limbal or fornix conjunctival incisions but is inefficient and requires guidance.
+
|Is able to perform limbal or fornix conjunctival incisions but is inefficient or  tentative and requires guidance with technique and/or position and size of  incision.
|Is able to efficiently perform either limbal or fornix conjunctival incision.
+
|Performs conjunctival incision without creating buttonholes and with no disruption of  adjacent tissues. Incision is of correct size (i.e. enough to give proper  exposure for performance of posterior subTenon’s dissection and formation of  scleral flap.
|
+
| 
 
|-
 
|-
|5
+
|5  
|Hooking rectus muscle
+
|Hemostasis
|Is unable to describe proper technique of hooking the muscle and is unable to perform technique.
+
|Is unable to describe the need for hemostasis, type of cautery required, appropriate technique. Is unable to perform.
|Is able to describe proper technique but unable to hook  muscle on first attempt.
+
| colspan="2" |Is able to describe the need for hemostasis, type of cautery required, appropriate  technique. Has difficulty performing proper technique.
|Usually hooks the muscle on first attempt but is inefficient.
+
|Is able to apply cautery but has difficulty with scleral burns, shrinkage of tissue,  obtaining hemostasis.
|Is able to  efficiently and precisely hook the muscle on first attempt.
+
|Is able to  efficiently and precisely apply hemostasis without significant scleral burns,  shrinkage of tissues and obtains hemostasis. Understands advantages and  disadvantages of different types of cautery tips.
|
+
| 
 
|-
 
|-
|6
 
|Exposure  of rectus muscle
 
|Is unable to describe proper dissection  technique to expose rectus muscle.
 
|Is able to describe dissection technique  for muscle exposure but requires constant guidance to perform the basic  steps.
 
|Is able  to perform basic exposure but is inefficient and/or occasionally disrupts  multiple tissue planes or branches of the anterior ciliary arteries.
 
|Is able  to efficiently expose muscle using a combination of sharp and blunt  dissection as appropriate and avoids branches of anterior ciliary arteries.
 
 
|
 
|
|-
 
|7
 
|Placement of suture in muscle
 
|Is unable to accurately describe muscle  suture technique.
 
|Is able to describe muscle suture technique. Multiple  attempts required to load or unload the needle-holder. Suture placement  inaccurate. Requires assistance to properly place suture.
 
|Is able to safely secure muscle with suture but is  inefficient. May
 
  
cause bleeding and muscle fiber cuts. Needs supervision  for locking bites at two ends of muscle.
 
|Is able  to safely, efficiently and accurately secure the muscle with minimal tissue  trauma without supervision.
 
|
 
|-
 
|
 
  
 +
 +
|Application of antimetabolite
 +
|Is  unable to accurately describe role of antimetabolites in trabeculectomy,  types of antimetabolites and the relative indication for use of each type,  safety considerations and use of pledget material.
 +
| colspan="2" |Is  able to accurately describe role of antimetabolites in trabeculectomy, types  of antimetabolites and the relative indication for use of each type, safety  considerations and use of pledget material. Needs guidance for choice of anti-metabolite and  exposure time. Needs guidance for fashioning of sponges. Inefficient or  inappropriate placement of sponges. Needs to be reminded to keep surgical  count. Does not protect conjunctival edge. Inefficient removal of sponges and  /or irrigation.
 +
|Is able to  safely apply antimetabolite onto eye but may have difficulty creating pledget  material to appropriate size and thickness. Appropriately discards materials  into toxic waste and rinses eye of residual antimetabolite material.
 +
|Is  able to safely, efficiently and accurately, apply antimetabolite onto eye and has no difficulty  creating pledget material to appropriate size and thickness. Appropriately  discards materials into toxic waste and thoroughly rinses eye of residual  antimetabolite material. Keeps surgical count of pledgets used.
  
8
 
|
 
  
 +
 +
|-
 +
|7 
 +
|Creation of scleral flap
 +
|Is  unable to describe dissection technique for flap creation.
 +
| colspan="2" |Is  able to describe dissection technique for flap creation but requires constant  guidance to perform the basic steps. Needs reminding to grasp sclera outside  flap construction area.
 +
|Is able to perform basic flap creation but is inefficient and/or  creates flaps that may be too thin, deep, small, or posterior or at risk of  avulsion.
 +
|Is able to efficiently create flap to the appropriate size and  depth without constant guidance.
  
Disinsertion of rectus muscle
+
Able to describe the complications and management of faulty scleral flap creation including buttonholing and avulsion of the flap.
|Is unable  to describe technique for rectus muscle disinsertion.
+
| 
|Is able  to describe but attempts to disinsert the muscle results in inadvertently cutting or nearly cutting the muscle suture or sclera.
 
|Is able  to perform disinsertion but occasionally causes inappropriate bleeding or  leaves muscle tissue attached to sclera. Requires some verbal instruction.
 
|Is able  to safely and efficiently disinsert rectus muscle.
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
|9
+
|8
|Use of  caliper/scleral ruler
+
|Paracentesis
|Is unable to mark the sclera with calipers or does not check the caliper setting to confirm planned action or is too aggressive with indenting the sclera with  caliper. Does not understand the potential discrepancy between arc-length and chord-length measurement.
+
|Puts anterior lens capsule or iris at risk when entering anterior chamber Inappropriate incision architecture, location, and size.
|Is able to mark sclera with calipers or scleral ruler but measurement is often not perpendicular to the original rectus insertion.  Checks caliper for correct measurement. Understands arc-length vs. chord  length measurements.
+
| colspan="2" |Needs instruction on how to perform. Leakage and/or iris prolapse with local pressure, provides poor surgical access.
|Is able to accurately mark sclera with calipers and/or scleral ruler but marks fade  because not prepared to make needle pass.
+
|Incision not in correct position or leaks.
|Is able to efficiently and accurately mark sclera with calipers and/or scleral ruler and is prepared to make needle pass immediately after marking sclera.
+
|Incision parallel to iris, self-sealing, adequate size, provides good access for surgical maneuvering.
|
+
| 
 
|-
 
|-
|10
+
|9 (a)
|Reattachment of muscle:  Intrascleral needle pass.
+
|Sclerostomy (with Kelly punch)
|Is unable to describe safe technique for intrascleral pass.
+
|Has difficulty with entry into anterior chamber, either  ineffective or trauma to ocular tissue. Uncontrolled entry into AC. Difficulty using Kelly punch.
|Is able to describe safe technique for intrascleral pass but does not approach the globe with  needle directed tangentially or does not unlock needle holder before starting the intrascleral pass. Unable to accurately obtain correct needle depth or  length.
+
| colspan="2" |Is able to create an entry plane into anterior chamber but has significant difficulty with using Kelly punch. Damages scleral flap. Makes sclerostomy too large /small or too anterior/posterior for appropriate filtration.
|Safely approaches the  globe with needle tip directed tangential to the globe. Visualizes needle tip  after entering the sclera and has no difficulty exiting the sclera but  intrascleral passes are frequently too short or too shallow. Minimal muscle belly sagging.
+
|Is  able to use the Kelly punch, but may be prone to creating a shelving wound with the punch. Makes sclerostomy too large or too  small for appropriate filtration.
|Approaches  the globe with needle directed tangentially and intrascleral passes are consistently of correct length and depth. No muscle belly sagging.
+
|Is able to create an appropriate entry plane into the anterior chamber and is able to use Kelly punch with dexterity. Sclerostomy  appropriate size for filtration.
|
+
| 
 
|-
 
|-
|11
+
|9 (b)
|Conjunctival closure (when appropriate)
+
|Sclerostomy (without  Kelly punch)
|Is unable to close conjunctiva. Unable to differentiate Tenon’s capsule from conjunctiva.
+
|Needs constant direction. Size of sclerostomy inappropriate or not in correct position
|Is able to perform basic conjunctival closure technique but is inefficient and requires significant guidance. Additional sutures are required.
+
| colspan="2" |Difficulty outlining and dissecting deep scleral flap. There may  be damage to surrounding tissues.
|Is able to safely close conjunctiva with good tissue approximation but is inefficient. .
+
|Able to outline deep scleral flap and perform dissection, but  has difficulty performing this smoothly, needs direction, unable to cleanly remove deeper scleral tissue.
|Is able to safely and efficiently close conjunctiva with good tissue approximation.
+
|Outlines deep scleral flap with ease, dissects flap sclera from underyling tissue without trauma to other structures, excises deep scleral  flap cleanly. Deep scleral flap/ sclerostomy of appropriate size and correctly positioned. Avoids damage to the underlying ciliary body.
|
+
| 
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|10 
| colspan="2" |'''Global Indices'''
+
|Peripheral iridectomy (PI)
|
+
|Cannot grasp iris tissue, damages surrounding structures.
|
+
| colspan="2" |Needs direction in grasping iris tissue and performing  iridectomy. Unable to control size of PI.
|
+
|Able to grasp iris tissue without damage to intraocular  structures, but PI either too large or too small. May need more than one  attempt
|
+
|Able to grasp iris tissue without damage to surrounding  structures, PI is of correct size.
 +
| 
 
|-
 
|-
|12
+
|11 
|Maintaining hemostasis
+
|Scleral flap suturing
|Is unable to describe proper rectus muscle dissection, suture placement and disinsertion to avoid  bleeding and/or unable to describe electrocautery technique.
+
|Instruction is required and stitches are placed in an awkward, slow fashion with multiple  passes to sclera or tear of flap, bends needles, incomplete suture rotation.
|Can describe techniques for avoiding and controlling bleeding but requires significant  guidance to perform proper dissection, suture placement, muscle disinsertion and electrocautery to minimize bleeding.
+
| colspan="2" |Stitches are placed with some difficulty, re-suturing may be needed, instruction needed. Difficulty achieving proper IOP at end of case.
|Usually applies proper tissue technique to avoid bleeding and is able to control bleeding using electrocautery but requires multiple attempts to cauterize and may  leave burnt carbon marks.
+
|Stitches are placed with minimal difficulty; tight enough to achieve wound closure and allow for appropriate filtration.
|Consistently applies proper tissue technique to avoid bleeding and is able to efficiently control bleeding using electrocautery.
+
|Stitches are placed with correct tension to allow for appropriate filtration. Able to  place both fixed and releasable sutures proficiently. Appropriate final IOP.
|
+
| 
 
|-
 
|-
|13
+
|12 
|Tissue handling
+
|Anterior chamber reformation
|Is excessively aggressive or timid in manipulating tissue. Inadvertent tissue damage occurs (including significant corneal epithelium disruption).
+
|Cannot cannulate anterior chamber via paracentesis.  Unable to assess whether anterior chamber of appropriate depth. Unable to assess whether IOP is satisfactory to proceed to next step.
|Aware of techniques for avoidance of tissue damage and bleeding but needs supervision to accomplish proper handling. Mild corneal  epithelium disruption may occur.
+
| colspan="2" |Has difficulty cannulating anterior chamber via paracentesis to reform anterior  chamber. Needs guidance.
|Tissue handling is safe but sometimes requires multiple attempts to achieve desired manipulation  of tissue. Minimal corneal epithelium disruption may occur.
+
|Cannulates anterior chamber with ease to reform anterior chamber, but has difficulty assessing ideal AC depth/IOP.
|Tissue handling is efficient, fluid and almost always achieves desired tissue  manipulation on first attempt.
+
|Cannulates AC with ease and is able to assess correct AC depth/ IOP for eye
|
+
| 
 
|-
 
|-
|14
+
|13 
|Knowledge of instruments
+
|Conjunctival closure
|Can only identify instruments in simple terms such as “muscle hook” and “forceps” but  no knowledge of necessary sutures or needle types.
+
|Is  unable to close conjunctiva. Unable to differentiate Tenon’s capsule from  conjunctiva.
|Can identify some but not most of the surgical instruments by proper names and  can identify necessary suture sizes and materials but not needle types.
+
| colspan="2" |Is  able to perform basic conjunctival closure technique but is inefficient and  requires significant guidance. Additional sutures are required. Significant  bleb leak at the end of surgery with unstable, shallow anterior chamber. May  have buttonhole of conjunctiva.
|Can  identify most but not all of the surgical instruments by proper name and can identify necessary suture sizes/materials but not needle types.
+
|Is able to safely close conjunctiva with good tissue approximation but is  inefficient. Requires guidance to ensure closure is effective without a leak. Placement of additional sutures or replacement of loose sutures required  before closure is complete and Seidel negative.
|Can  identify all surgical instruments by proper names and can identify necessary suture sizes/materials and needle types.
+
|Is able to safely and efficiently close conjunctiva with good tissue approximation, no bleb leak and stable anterior chamber. Has good understanding of various suture types, appropriate needles and different  closure techniques.
|
+
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="8" |'''Global Indices'''
 +
|-
 +
|1 
 +
|Maintaining hemostasis
 +
| colspan="2" |Is  unable to describe types of cautery, settings for cautery and/or unable to  describe electrocautery technique.
 +
|Can  describe techniques for avoiding and controlling bleeding but requires  significant guidance to perform proper cautery to minimize bleeding.
 +
|Usually  applies proper tissue technique to avoid bleeding and is able to control bleeding using cautery but requires multiple attempts to cauterize and may  leave burnt carbon marks.
 +
|Consistently applies proper tissue technique to avoid bleeding and is able to efficiently control bleeding using cautery.
 +
| 
 
|-
 
|-
|15
+
|
|Technique of holding suture needle in needle holder
+
|Tissue handling
|Frequently loads needle incorrectly.
+
| colspan="2" |Is excessively aggressive or timid  in manipulating tissue. Inadvertent tissue damage occurs to conjunctiva or sclera. Needs direction to grasp sclera outside margins of intended scleral  flap.
|Loads needle in proper direction for a forehand pass but sometimes loads incorrectly for backhand pass. Loads too close or too far from the swaged end of the needle.
+
|Aware of techniques for avoidance of tissue damage and bleeding but needs supervision to accomplish proper handling.  Needs direction to grasp sclera outside margins of intended scleral flap.  Conjunctival buttonholes present.
|Loads needle properly for forehand and backhand needle pass but is inefficient and  often requires multiple attempts.
+
|Tissue handling is safe but sometimes requires multiple attempts to achieve desired  manipulation of tissue.  No direction  required to avoid grasping sclera within margins of intended scleral flap.  Conjunctiva is intact but manipulated aggressively/unsafely e.g. toothed  forceps.
|Loads needle properly and efficiently for forehand and backhand needle passes.
+
|Tissue handling is efficient, fluid and almost always achieves  desired tissue manipulation on first attempt. No conjunctival buttonholes present.
|
+
| 
 
|-
 
|-
|16
+
|
|Technique of surgical knot tying
+
|Knowledge of instruments
|Unable to tie knots.
+
| colspan="2" |Can only identify instruments in simple terms such as “scissors” and “forceps” but no knowledge of necessary sutures or needle types.
|Require multiple extra hand maneuvers to make first throw lay flat and/or loosens  first throw while attempting to perform the second throw.
+
|Can identify some but not most of the surgical instruments by proper names and can identify necessary suture sizes and materials but not needle types.
|Is able to tie a flat surgeon’s knot first throw but second and third throws are inefficient. Does not inadvertently loosen the first throw.
+
|Can identify most but not all of the surgical instruments by  proper name and can identify necessary suture sizes/materials but not needle  types.
|Is able to efficiently tie a flat, square surgeon’s knot.
+
|Can identify all surgical instruments by proper names and can identify necessary suture sizes/materials and needle types.
|
+
| 
 
|-
 
|-
|17
+
|
|Communication with surgical team
+
|Technique of holding  suture needle in needle holder
|Does not know role of surgical team members. Lacks confidence or has too much. Does not establish good rapport with team. Unable to request instruments from scrub nurse using proper instrument and suture names and/or instructions to surgical assistant are vague or nonexistent.
+
| colspan="2" |Frequently loads needle incorrectly.
|Knows role of most surgical team members. Lacks confidence. Has difficulty establishing good rapport with team members. Able to request most instruments from scrub nurse using proper instrument and suture names but instructions to surgical assistant are inadequate to perform procedure safely.
+
|Loads needle in proper direction for a forehand pass but  sometimes loads incorrectly for backhand pass. Loads too close or too far  from the swaged end of the needle.
|Knows role of each surgical team member. Is somewhat confident and usually treats team with respect. Establishes good working relationship. Able to request most instruments from scrub nurse using proper instrument and suture names in correct order. Instructions to surgical assistant are adequate for a skilled assistant but inadequate for an unskilled assistant.
+
|Loads needle properly for forehand and backhand needle pass but  is inefficient and often requires multiple attempts.
|Knows role of each surgical team member. Is confident and treats team with respect. Establishes good working relationship. Able to efficiently request instruments from scrub nurse using proper names in correct order. Able to consistently give clear instructions to surgical assistant.
+
|Loads needle properly and efficiently for forehand and backhand  needle passes.
|
+
|}
+
|-
Overall difficulty of procedure (circle):           Simple             Intermediate                Difficult
+
|5 
 
+
|Technique of surgical  knot tying
 
+
| colspan="2" |Unable to tie  knots.
Good points: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
+
|Require multiple extra hand maneuvers to make first throw lay  flat and/or loosens first throw while attempting to perform the second throw.
 
+
|Is able to tie a flat surgeon’s knot first throw but second and  third throws are inefficient. Does not inadvertently loosen the first throw.
 
+
|Is able to efficiently tie a flat, square surgeon’s knot.
 
+
Suggestions for development: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
+
|-
 +
|6 
 +
|Communication with surgical team
 +
| colspan="2" |Does not know role of surgical team members. Lacks confidence or has too much. Does not establish good rapport with team. Unable to request instruments from scrub nurse using proper instrument and suture names and/or instructions to surgical assistant are vague or nonexistent.
 +
|Knows role of most surgical team members. Lacks confidence. Has difficulty establishing good rapport with team members. Able to request most instruments from scrub nurse using proper instrument and suture names but instructions to surgical assistant are inadequate to perform procedure safely.
 +
|Knows role of each surgical team member. Is somewhat confident and usually treats team with respect. Establishes good working relationship. Able to request most instruments from scrub nurse using proper instrument and suture names in correct order. Instructions to surgical assistant are adequate for a skilled assistant but inadequate for an unskilled assistant.
 +
|Knows role of each surgical team member. Is confident and treats team with respect. Establishes good working relationship. Able to efficiently request instruments from scrub nurse using proper names in correct order. Able to consistently give clear instructions to surgical assistant. Communicates with anesthetist, if present.
 +
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|}
  
  
Agreed action: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
+
Overall difficulty of procedure (circle):           Simple             Intermediate                Difficult
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Good points: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 +
 
  
 +
Suggestions for development: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________
  
  
Signature of Assessor: ___________________________________        Signature of Trainee: ____________________________________
+
Agreed action: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
  
  
  
5.2.10 The coecsa phaco-OSCAR
+
Signature of Assessor: ___________________________________        Signature of Trainee: ____________________________________The COECSA PAEDIATRIC CATARACT-OSCAR  
  
'''The COECSA PHACO-OSCAR'''
+
===== '''The COECSA PAEDIATRIC CATARACT-OSCAR''' =====
 +
This should be completed at the end of the case and immediately discussed with the student to provide timely, structured, specific performance feedback. Circle the appropriate cells and if previous PAED CAT-OSCARS are available review them in order to develop a plan for improvement
  
The COECSA PHACO-OSCAR is adapted from the ICO-OSCARs available at icoph.org/ico-oscar.  It should be completed at the end of the case and immediately discussed with the student to provide timely, structured, specific performance feedback. Circle the appropriate cells and if previous PHACO-OSCARS are available review them in order to develop a plan for improvement
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="7" |   '''COECSA PHACO-Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubric: Phacoemulsification (COECSA PHACO -OSCAR)'''
+
| colspan="7" |'''COECSA PAEDIATRIC CATARACT SURGERY-Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubric (COECSA PAED CAT-OSCAR)'''  
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan="2" |Date ______
 
| colspan="2" |Date ______
  
 +
Resident ___________
  
Resident _______
+
Evaluator __________
 
 
 
 
Evaluator _______
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
|Novice   
 
|Novice   
  
Line 8,463: Line 8,887:
  
 
(score  = 5)
 
(score  = 5)
|Not applicable. Done by consultant or senior resident
+
|Not applicable. Done by consultant or senior resident (score= 0)
 
 
(score= 0)
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|1
 
|1
|Draping:
+
|Draping:
|Unable to start draping without help.  
+
|Unable to start draping without help.  
|Drapes with minimal verbal instruction. Incomplete lash coverage.  
+
|Drapes with minimal verbal instruction. Incomplete lash coverage.  
|Lashes mostly covered, drape at most minimally obstructing view.  
+
|Lashes mostly covered, drape at most minimally obstructing view.  
|Lashes completely covered and clear of incision site, drape not obstructing view.  
+
|Lashes completely covered and clear of incision site, drape not obstructing the  view.  
| 
+
|
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2
 
|2
|Incision & Paracentesis: Formation  & Technique  
+
|Incision (corneal or corneo-scleral) &Paracentesis: Formation& Technique
|Inappropriate incision architecture, location, and size.
+
|Inappropriate incision architecture, location, and size.
|Leakage and/or iris prolapse with local pressure, provides poor surgical access to and visibility of capsule and bag.
+
|Leakage and/or iris prolapse with local pressure, provides poor surgical access to and visibility of capsule and bag.
|Incision either well-placed or non-leaking but not both.  
+
|Incision either valvular or of good internal length not both.  
|Incision parallel to iris, self  sealing, adequate size, provides good access for surgical maneuvering.  
+
|Incision parallel to iris, valvular and of good internal length provides good access for surgical maneuvering.  
| 
+
|
 
|-
 
|-
|3
+
|
|Viscoelastic:
+
|
  
Appropriate Use and Safe Insertion   
 
|Unsure of when, what type and how much  viscoelastic to use. Has difficulty accessing anterior chamber through  paracentesis.
 
  
.
+
Staining of the anterior capsule
|Requires minimal instruction. Knows when to use but administers incorrect amount or type.  
+
|Unsure  about the technique of injecting 0.1%Trypan Blue dye, the amount to be  injected and the waiting time before washing off the dye to stain the  anterior capsule.
|Requires no instruction. Uses at appropriate time. Administers adequate amount and type. Cannula tip in good position. Unsure of correct viscoelastic if multiple types available.  
+
|Knows  the technique but requires instruction on injecting, waiting time. Anterior chamber fluctuates while injecting the dye. Does not use sterile air to protect the corneal endothelium. Administers incorrect amount or washes off  the dye too quickly.  
|Viscoelastics are administered in appropriate amount and at the appropriate time with cannula tip clear of lens capsule and endothelium. Appropriate viscoelastic is used if multiple types of viscoelastics are available.  
+
|Requires no instruction. Uses  adequate sterile air bubble to protect the corneal endothelium. Administers adequate amount and waits for adequate time.   Washes off the dye with saline a little too early causing improper and patchy staining of the capsule. May cause endothelial staining due to excess  trypan or inadequate air bubble.
| 
+
|Administers adequate amount. . Uses adequate sterile air bubble to protect the corneal  endothelium Waits for one minute and or wait for the dye to stain the  anterior capsule uniformly and then washes away the dye with saline. The  anterior chamber remains stable during the whole process. There is no staining of the corneal endothelium.
 +
|
 
|-
 
|-
 
|4
 
|4
|CapsulorrhexisCommencement of Flap & follow-through.
+
|Viscoelastic:
|Instruction required, tentative, chases rather than controls rhexis, cortex disruption may occur.
+
 
|Minimal instruction, predominantly in control with occasional loss of control of rhexis, cortex  disruption may occur.  
+
Appropriate Use and Safe Insertion  
|In control, few awkward or repositioning movements, no cortex disruption.
+
|Unsure of when, what type and how much  OVDto use. Has difficulty accessing anterior chamber through paracentesis.
|Delicate approach and  confident control of the rhexis, no cortex  disruption.
+
 
 +
.
 +
|Requires minimal instruction. Knows when to use but administers incorrect amount or type.  
 +
|Requires no instruction. Uses at appropriate time. Administers adequate amount and type. Cannula tip in good  position. Unsure of correct OVD if multiple types available.  
 +
|OVDs are administered in appropriate amount and at the appropriate time with cannula tip clear of lens capsule and  endothelium. Appropriate OVDs used if multiple types of OVD are available.
 
|   
 
|   
 
|-
 
|-
 
|5
 
|5
|Capsulorrhexis:   
+
|Anterior Capsulorrhexis: Commencement of Flap& follow-through.
 +
|With Forceps: Instruction required,  tentative, chases rather than controls rhexis, lens matter disruption may  occur.
 +
 
 +
With Vitrector: Instruction required for  initiation of capsulorrhexis, unsure of vitrectomy settings, anterior chamber  (AC) fluctuates frequently.
 +
|With Forceps: Minimal instruction,  predominantly in control with occasional loss of control of rhexis, lens  matter disruption may occur.
 +
 
 +
With Vitrector: Minimal instruction needed,  has knowledge of machine settings for capsulotomy, AC is stable throughout.
 +
|With Forceps: In control, few awkward or  repositioning movements, no lens matter disruption.
  
Formation and Circular  Completion
+
With Vitrector:  In control, No lens matter disruption or AC fluctuation, Few awkward movements noticed.
|Size and position are inadequate for nucleus density & type of implant, tear may occur.  
+
|With Forceps: Delicate approach and  confident control of the rhexis, no lens matter disruption.
|Size and position are barely adequate for nucleus density and implant type, difficulty achieving  circular rhexis, tear may occur.  
+
 
|Size and position are almost exact for nucleus density and implant type, shows control, requires  only minimal instruction.
+
With Vitrector:  Has a sound knowledge of vitrector machine settings for capsulotomy, well controlled initiation and completion of  rhexis.  
|Adequate size and position for nucleus  density & type of implant, no tears, rapid, unaided control of radialization, maintains control of the flap and AC  depth throughout the capsulorrhexis.  
+
|   
|   
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|6
 
|6
|Hydrodissection: Visible Fluid Wave and Free Nuclear Rotation
+
|Anterior  Capsulorrhexis:
|Hydrodissection fluid not injected in  quantity nor place to achieve nucleus rotation.  
+
 
|Multiple attempts required, able to rotate nucleus somewhat but not completely.  Tries to manually force rotation before adequate hydrodissection.
+
Formation and Circular Completion
|Fluid injected in appropriate location, able to rotate nucleus but encounters more than minimal  resistance.  
+
|With Forceps or vitrector: Size and  position are inadequate for a paediatric cataract.
|Ideally see free fluid  wave but adequate if free nuclear rotation with minimal resistance is  achieved. Aware of contraindications to hydrodissection.
+
|With Forceps or vitrector: Size and  position are barely adequate, difficulty achieving circular rhexis, tear may  occur.
 +
|With Forceps or vitrector: Size and  position are almost exact, shows control, and requires only minimal  instruction. Nearly all of the optic edge covered by the capsule edge.
 +
|With Forceps or vitrector: Adequate size (5-6 mm) and position for paediatric cataract, no tears, rapid, unaided control of  radialization, maintains control of the flap and AC depth throughout the capsulorrhexis.
 +
|
 +
 
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
|7
 +
|Hydrodissection:
 +
|Hydrodissection fluid not injected in  sufficient quantity or place to achieve desired displacement of the soft nucleus.  Unaware of contraindications to hydrodissection such as posterior polar  cataract or a suspected pre-existing posterior capsule dehiscence.  
 +
|Multiple attempts required to achieve the  desired displacement of the soft nucleus.  
 +
|Fluid injected in appropriate location, has  sound knowledge of contraindications to hydrodissection.  
 +
|Adequate if free nuclear rotation with minimal resistance is achieved or adequate separation of nucleus and epinucleus from the cortex is obtained. Aware of contraindications to hydrodissection.
 
|   
 
|   
 
|-
 
|-
|7
+
|8(a)
|Phacoemulsification  Probe and Second Instrument: Insertion Into Eye  
+
|Aspiration Probe and Second Instrument: Insertion Into Eye
|Has great difficulty  inserting the probe or second instrument, AC collapses, may damage wound,  capsule or Descemet’s membrane  
+
|Has great difficulty  inserting the probe or second instrument, AC collapses, may damage wound,  capsule or Descemet’s membrane
|Inserts the probe or  second instrument after some failed attempts, may damage wound, capsule or  Descemet’s membrane.  
+
|Inserts the probe or second instrument after some failed attempts, may damage wound, capsule or  Descemet’s membrane.
|Inserts probe and second  instrument on first attempt with mild difficulty, no damage to wound, capsule  or Descemet’s membrane.  
+
|Inserts probe and second  instrument on first attempt with mild difficulty, no damage to wound, capsule  or Descemet’s membrane.
|Smoothly inserts  instruments into the eye without damaging the wound or Descemet's membrane.
+
|Smoothly inserts instruments into the eye without damaging the wound or Descemet's membrane.
 
 
 
 
 
|   
 
|   
 
|-
 
|-
|8
+
|8(b)
|Phacoemulsification  Probe and Second Instrument: Effective Use and Stability  
+
|Aspiration Probe and Second Instrument: Effective Use and Stability  
|Tip frequently not visible, has much difficulty keeping the eye in primary position and uses  excessive force to do so.  
+
|Tip frequently not visible, has much difficulty keeping the eye in primary position and uses excessive force to do so.
|Tip often not visible,  often requires manipulation to keep eye in primary position.
+
|Tip often not visible, often requires manipulation to keep eye in primary position.
  
 
+
   
|Maintains visibility of  tip at most times, eye is generally kept in primary position with mild  depression or pulling on the globe.  
+
|Maintains visibility of tip at most times, eye is generally kept in primary position with mild  depression or pulling on the globe.
|Maintains visibility of  instrument tips at all times, keeps the eye in primary position without  depressing or pulling up the globe.  
+
|Maintains visibility of  instrument tips at all times, keeps the eye in primary position without  depressing or pulling up the globe.
 
|   
 
|   
 
|-
 
|-
 
|9
 
|9
|Nucleus: 
+
|
 +
 
  
Sculpting or Primary  Chop
+
Management of Lens: Aspiration Technique
|Frequently incorrect power used during sculpting, applies power at inappropriate times, excessive phaco probe movement causes constant eye/nucleus movement, unable to engage nucleus (chop method) or the groove is of inadequate depth or width  (divide and conquer), cannot control Phacodynamics. Unable to correctly work foot pedals.
+
|Great difficulty in aspirating the nucleus, introducing the tip under the capsulorrhexis borderposition of aspiration hole not controlled, cannot regulate aspiration flow as needed, cannot peel cortical material adequately, and engages capsule or iris with aspiration port.
|Moderate error in power used while sculpting, tentative, frequent eye/nucleus movement produced by phaco tip, difficult to engage nucleus (chop technique) or groove adequately after many attempts (divide and conquer), poor control of phacodynamics with  frequent anterior chamber depth fluctuations. Has difficulty working foot pedals.
+
|Moderate difficulty  introducing aspiration tip under capsulorrhexis and maintaining hole up position, attempts to aspirate without occluding tip, shows poor comprehension of aspiration dynamics, cortical peeling is not well controlled, jerky and slow, capsule potentially compromised. Prolonged attempts result in minimal residual cortical material.
|Uses correct power with minimal error when sculpting, occasional eye/nucleus movement caused by phaco tip, some difficulty in engaging or holding nucleus (chop method) or groove adequate  with minimal repeat attempts,  fairly good  control of phacodynamics with occasional anterior chamber depth change.  Minimal mistakes using foot pedals.
+
|Minimal difficulty introducing the aspiration tip under the capsulorrhexis, aspiration hole usually upcortex well engaged for 360 degrees, cortical peeling slow, few technical errors, minimal residual cortical material.
|Sculpting is performed using adequate ultrasound power regulated by the pedal, with forward  movements that do not change the eye position or push the nucleus, the  nucleus is safely engaged (with chop method) or the groove is appropriate in  depth and width (divide and conquer technique), phacodynamics are controlled  as evidenced by the internal anterior chamber environment. Adept at foot pedal control.
+
|Aspiration tip is introduced into the nucleus to aspirate and then under the free border of the  capsulorrhexis in irrigation mode with the aspiration hole up, Aspiration is activated in just enough flow as to occlude the tip, efficiently removes all cortex, The cortical material is peeled gently towards the center of the  pupil, tangentially in cases of zonular weakness
| 
+
|
 
|-
 
|-
 
|10
 
|10
|NucleusRotation and Manipulation
+
|
|Unable to rotate nucleus.  
+
 
|Able to rotate nucleus partially and with zonular stress.  
+
 
|Able to rotate nucleus fully but with zonular stress. 
+
Primary Posterior Capsulorrhexis (PPC) initiation
|Nucleus is safely and  efficiently manipulated producing minimal stress on zonules and globe.   
+
|Tentative, needs  instructions, unable to clearly visualize the posterior capsule.
| 
+
 
 +
 
 +
'''With Forceps:''' Not  sure if a nick has been made in the posterior capsule. Unable to grasp the  lifted posterior capsule with forceps.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
'''With Vitrector:''' Struggles while making a sclerotomy site and inserting the irrigating cannula, Anterior  chamber (AC) keeps fluctuating. Wrong site for initiating posterior capsulotomy. 
 +
|Requires minimal instructions
 +
 
 +
 
 +
'''With Forceps:''' Able  to clearly appreciate the posterior capsule and nick made with a cystitome  and initiate PPC, moderate vitreous disturbance. Able to grasp the posterior  capsule with minimal difficulty.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
'''With Vitrector:''' Needs minimal instructions while deciding the site and technique of sclerotomy, AC  remains stable. Site of initiating the capsulotomy is correct. 
 +
|'''With Forceps:''' In  control, few awkward movements while making the nick and trying to grasp the  posterior capsule, no vitreous disruption.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
'''With Vitrector:''' Performs proper sclerotomy and inserts infusion cannula with ease, AC does  not fluctuate, visualizes the vitrector probe in the centre before starting  capsulotomy, requires minimal instructions for initiating capsulotomy.  
 +
|'''With Forceps:''' Able to grasp the posterior capsule with ease and at will. Delicate approach and confident control of the rhexis, no vitreous disruption.  
 +
 
 +
'''With Vitrector:'''  Understands the difference in surgical anatomy of pars plana for age, makes a  proper sclerotomy at the desired distance with an MVR blade, properly places the infusion port to maintain the AC, Starts posterior capsulotomy from the  centre.
 +
|
 
|-
 
|-
 
|11
 
|11
|Nucleus: Cracking or Chopping With Safe Phacoemulsification of Segments
+
|
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Primary Posterior Capsulorrhexis(PPC) formation and completion
 +
|'''With Forceps:''' Poor control when proceeding with the capsulotomy. Vitreous disturbance occurs. Inadequate size and position of PPC.
 +
 
  
 +
'''With Vitrector:''' Does  not have knowledge of machine settings while performing capsulotomy and  vitrectomy. Improper technique and inadequate size of capsulotomy. Peripheral  extension of posterior capsular tear may occur.
 +
|'''With Forceps:'''  predominantly in control with occasional loss of control of rhexis. Size and  position are barely adequate, difficulty achieving circular rhexis, tear may  occur.
  
|'''CRACKING''': Grooves are  not centered or deep enough and go  into epinucleus, nucleus is constantly displaced from central position,  unable to crack nucleus at all, eye constantly moving. 
 
  
'''CHOPPING:''' Always endangers or engages adjacent tissue, unable to accomplish chop of any piece.  
+
'''With Vitrector:'''  Moderate difficulty in performing capsulotomy and vitrectomy, unable to decide if size of capsulotomy is adequate. Knowledge on machine settings not  complete. Difficulty in achieving circular rhexis and may cause peripheral  tears.  
 +
|'''With Forceps:''' Able to proceed and  complete capsulotomy with minimal instructions. Size and position are almost  exact, shows good control. Needs minimal instructions if capsulotomy starts  extending peripherally. Able to use appropriate OVD to help facilitate PPC at  appropriate stage
  
'''SEGMENT PHACOEMULSIFICATION''': produces significant wound burn, great difficulty pursuing  fragments around the anterior chamber and into the bag, poor awareness of  second instrument tip and difficulty keeping the second hand instrument under the phaco tip, 
 
|'''CRACKING''': Some grooves  are centered and deep enough and some go into epinucleus, displaces nucleus  in most grooves, attempts to split nucleus with instruments too shallow in  groove, able to crack portion of nucleus, eye often moving.
 
  
'''CHOPPING:''' endangers  or engages adjacent tissue in most chops''','''  able to accomplish chop of some pieces.
 
  
'''SEGMENT PHACOEMULSIFICATION''': produces light wound burn, pursues most fragments around the  AC and into the bag, the second  hand instrument is sometimes under the phaco tip
 
|'''CRACKING''': Most grooves  are centered and deep enough, rarely goes into epinucleus, rarely displaces  nucleus, sometimes attempts to split in mid-nucleus but succeeds, eye usually  in primary position.
 
  
'''CHOPPING:''' endangers or engages adjacent tissue in some chops''','''  able to accomplish chop of most pieces.   
+
'''With Vitrector:''' Able to perform adequate capsulotomy with ease. Has a sound knowledge on the  change in settings while performing capsulotomy. Needs minimal instructions  if capsulotomy starts extending peripherally. 
 +
|'''With Forceps:''' Adequate size and  position for age, no tears, rapid, unaided control of radialization, maintains control throughout. Able to manage independently if posterior  capsulotomy starts extending peripherally. Able to use appropriate OVD to help facilitate PPC at appropriate stage
  
'''SEGMENT PHACOEMULSIFICATION''': produces minimal wound burn, pursues some fragments around the  AC and into the bag, the second  hand instrument is usually under the phaco tip
 
|'''CRACKING''': Grooves are  centered, deep enough to ensure cracking, length does not reach epinucleus,  nucleus is not displaced from central position, places instruments deep  enough to easily and successfully crack nucleus, eye stays in primary  position.
 
  
'''CHOPPING:''' Nucleus  engaged and vertical or horizontal chop technique undertaken with no  inadvertent engagement of adjacent tissue (especially capsule). Full  thickness nuclear chop of all pieces in a controlled and fluid manner. 
 
  
'''SEGMENT PHACOEMULSIFICATION''': No wound burns, Pieces are "floated" to the tip without "pursuing" the fragments around the anterior chamber and  the bag, The second hand instrument is kept under the phaco tip to prevent posterior capsule contact if surge arises.  
+
'''With Vitrector:'''  Adequate size (4-5 mm) and position for age, no tears. Has a sound knowledge on the change in settings while performing capsulotomy. Able to manage independently if posterior capsulotomy starts extending peripherally.  
| 
+
|
 
|-
 
|-
 
|12
 
|12
|Irrigation and Aspiration Technique
+
|
 +
 
 +
 
  
With Adequate Removal of Cortex
+
Anterior Vitrectomy
|Great difficulty introducing the  aspiration tip under the capsulorrhexis border, aspiration hole position not  controlled, cannot regulate aspiration flow as needed, cannot peel cortical  material adequately, engages capsule or iris with aspiration port.  
+
|Needs Instruction, Difficulty  in appreciating vitreous in anterior chamber or the bag, Technique of holding the bimanual irrigation cannula and vitrector is wrong, not sure of settings for vitrectomy. May cut the posterior capsule inadvertently.
|Moderate difficulty introducing aspiration tip under capsulorrhexis and maintaining hole up positionattempts to aspirate without occluding tip, shows poor comprehension of  aspiration dynamics, cortical peeling  is not well controlled, jerky and slow, capsule potentially compromised. prolonged attempts result in minimal  residual cortical material.
+
|Requires minimal instructions, holds the vitrector properly, minimal fluctuation in the anterior chamber during vitrectomy, able to appreciate the presence of  vitreous. Unable to perform complete vitrectomy, stays too anterior in vitreous cavity. May cut the posterior capsule inadvertently.  
|Minimal difficulty introducing the  aspiration tip under the capsulorrhexis, aspiration hole usually up, cortex will engaged for 360 degrees, cortical peeling slow, few technical errors, minimal residual cortical material.
+
|Performs anterior vitrectomy  with control, able to clear the anterior and posterior chamber free of  vitreous but unable to judge if adequate vitrectomy has been performed, maintains the anterior chamber during vitrectomy. Maintains the posterior Capsulorrhexis margins intact. Peaking of posterior capsule due to inadequate vitrectomy may be noted.  
|Aspiration tip is introduced under the free border of the capsulorrhexis in irrigation mode with the aspiration hole up, Aspiration is activated in just enough flow as to occlude the tipefficiently removes all cortex, The cortical material is peeled gently towards the center of the pupil, tangentially in cases of zonular weakness.  
+
|Knows the goals of performing anterior vitrectomy in paediatric age.  Knows the end point of complete anterior vitrectomy, Anterior and posterior chamber completely cleared of vitreous, adequate depth of vitrectomy performed in vitreous cavity all around the posterior  Capsulorrhexis. Maintains the anterior chamber throughout.
| 
+
|
 
|-
 
|-
 
|13
 
|13
|Lens Insertion,  Rotation, and Final
+
|
 +
 
 +
 
  
Position of Intraocular  Lens  
+
IOL Insertion, Rotation, and Final Position of Intraocular  Lens
|Unable to insert IOL, unable to  produce adequate incision for implant type '''NON-FOLDABLE:''' unable to place the lower haptic in the capsular bag, unable to rotate the upper haptic into place '''FOLDABLE:  ''' unable to load IOL into injector or forcep, no control of lens  injection, doesn't control tip  placement, lens is not in the capsular bag or is injected upside down.
+
|Unable to insert IOL, unable to  produce adequate incision for implant '''FOLDABLE:  ''' unable to load IOL into injector or forceps, no control of lens  injection, doesn't control tip  placement, lens is not in the capsular bag or is injected upside down.
|Insertion and manipulation  of IOL is difficult, eye handled roughly, anterior chamber  not stable, repeated attempts result in borderline incision for implant  type '''NON-FOLDABLE:''' repeated  hesitant attempts result in lower haptic in the capsular bag, upper haptic is rotated into place but with excessive force on  capsulorrhexis and zonules and repeated attempts are necessary '''FOLDABLE:'''  difficulty loading IOL into  injector or forcep,, hesitant, poor control of lens injection, difficulty  controlling tip placement, excessive manipulation required to get both haptics into capsular bag.  
+
|Insertion and manipulation of IOL is difficult, eye handled roughly, anterior chamber not stable, repeated attempts result in borderline incision for implant  type '''FOLDABLE:'''  difficulty loading IOL into  injector or forceps, hesitant, poor control of lens injection, difficulty  controlling tip placement, excessive manipulation required to get both haptics into capsular bag.
|Insertion and manipulation  of IOL is accomplished with minimal anterior chamber instability, incision just adequate for implant type '''NON-FOLDABLE:''' the lower haptic is placed inside the capsular bag with some  difficulty, upper haptic is rotated into place with some stress on the capsulorrhexis and zonule fibers '''FOLDABLE:''' , minimal difficulty loading IOL into injector of forcep, hesitant but good control of lens injection, minimal difficulty controlling tip placement,  both haptics are in the capsular bag.  
+
|Insertion and manipulation of IOL is accomplished with minimal anterior chamber instability, incision just adequate for implant '''FOLDABLE:'''  minimal difficulty  loading IOL into injector of forceps, hesitant but good control of lens injection, minimal difficulty controlling tip placement,  both haptics are in the capsular bag.
|Insertion and manipulation of IOL is performed in a deep and stable anterior chamber and capsular bag, with incision appropriate for implant type.  '''NON-FOLDABLE''': The lower haptic is smoothly placed inside the capsular  bag; the upper haptic is rotated into place without exerting excessive stress to the capsulorrhexis or the zonule fibers.  '''FOLDABLE''':  Able to load IOL into injector or forcep,   lens is injected in a controlled fashion, fixation of IOL is symmetric; the optic and both haptics are inside the capsular bag. 
+
|Insertion and manipulation of IOL is performed in a deep and stable anterior chamber and capsular bag, with incision appropriate for implant type. '''FOLDABLE''': Able to load IOL into injector or forceps, lens is injected in a controlled fashion, fixation of IOL is symmetric; the optic and both haptics are inside the capsular bag.
 
|   
 
|   
 
|-
 
|-
 
|14
 
|14
|Wound Closure (Including Suturing, Hydration, and  Checking Security as Required)  
+
|Wound Closure (Including Suturing, Hydration, and Checking Security as Required)
|If suturing is needed, instruction is required and stitches are placed in an awkward, slow fashion with much difficulty, astigmatism, bent needles, incomplete suture rotation and wound leakage may result, unable to remove viscoelastics thoroughly. unable to make incision water tight or does not check wound for seal.  Improper final IOP.
+
|When suturing is needed, instruction is required and stitches are placed in an awkward, slow fashion with much difficulty, astigmatism, bent needles, incomplete suture rotation and wound leakage may result, unable to remove OVDs thoroughly. Unable to make incision water tight or does not check wound for seal.  Improper final chamber depth IOP
|If suturing is needed,  stitches are placed with some difficulty, resuturing may be needed,  questionable wound closure with probable astigmatism, instruction may be needed, questionable whether all viscoelastics are thoroughly removed, Extra maneuvers are  required to make the incision water tight at the end of the surgery.  May have improper IOP.
+
|When suturing is needed,  stitches are placed with some difficulty, resuturing may be needed,  questionable wound closure with probable astigmatism, instruction may be needed, questionable whether all viscoelastics are thoroughly removed, Extra manoeuvres are  required to make the incision water tight at the end of the surgery.  May have improper IOP.
|If suturing is needed, stitches are placed with minimal difficulty  tight enough to maintain the wound closed, may have slight astigmatism, viscoelastics are adequately removed after this step with some difficulty, The incision is checked and is water tight or needs minimal adjustment at the end of the surgery.  May have improper IOP.
+
|When suturing is needed, stitches are placed with minimal difficulty tight enough to maintain the wound closed, may have slight astigmatism, viscoelastics are adequately removed after this step with some difficulty, The incision is checked and is water tight or needs minimal adjustment at the end of the surgery.  May have improper IOP.
|If suturing is needed, stitches are  placed tight enough to maintain the wound closed, but not too tight as to  induce astigmatism, viscoelastics are thoroughly removed after this step, the incision is checked and is water tight at the end of the surgery.  Proper final IOP.
+
|When suturing is needed, stitches are  placed tight enough to maintain the wound closed, but not too tight as to  induce astigmatism, OVDs are adequately removed, and the incision is checked and is water tight at the end of the surgery.   Proper final IOP.
 
|   
 
|   
|-
+
|}
|
+
{| class="wikitable"
|'''Global Indices'''  
+
| colspan="7" |'''Global Indices'''
|
 
 
 
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|15
 
|15
|Wound Neutrality and Minimizing  Eye Rolling and Corneal Distortion  
+
|Wound Neutrality and minimizing Eye Rolling and Corneal Distortion
|Nearly constant eye movement and  corneal distortion.  
+
|Nearly constant eye movement and corneal distortion.  
|Eye often not in primary position,  frequent distortion folds.  
+
|Eye often not in primary position, frequent distortion folds.  
 
|Eye usually in primary position, mild  corneal distortion folds occur.  
 
|Eye usually in primary position, mild  corneal distortion folds occur.  
|The eye is kept in primary position  during the surgery. No distortion folds are produced. The length and location  of incisions prevents distortion of the cornea.  
+
|The eye is kept in primary position during the surgery. No distortion folds are produced. The length and location of incisions prevents distortion of the cornea.  
 
|   
 
|   
 
|-
 
|-
 
|16
 
|16
|Eye Positioned Centrally Within Microscope View  
+
|Use of dilating agents and devices
|Constantly requires repositioning.  
+
|Does not have knowledge of dilating agents  or devices
 +
|Has a good knowledge of dilating agents or  devices but unsure of dose and technique.
 +
|Has adequate knowledge of dilating agents,  of dose and devices but needs minimal instructions while usage
 +
|Has adequate knowledge of dilating agents,  of dose and devices. Needs no instructions while performing the technique.
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|17
 +
|Eye Positioned Centrally Within Microscope View
 +
|Constantly requires repositioning.  
 
|Occasional repositioning required.  
 
|Occasional repositioning required.  
 
|Mild fluctuation in pupil position.  
 
|Mild fluctuation in pupil position.  
Line 8,639: Line 9,106:
 
|   
 
|   
 
|-
 
|-
|17
+
|18
|Conjunctival and Corneal  Tissue Handling  
+
|Conjunctival and corneal Tissue Handling
|Tissue handling is rough and damage occurs.  
+
|Tissue handling is rough and damage occurs.
|Tissue handling borderline, minimal  damage occurs.  
+
|Tissue handling borderline, minimal damage occurs.  
|Tissue handling decent but potential  for damage exists.  
+
|Tissue handling decent but potential for damage exists.  
|Tissue is not damaged nor at risk by handling.  
+
|Tissue is not damaged nor at risk by handling.  
 
|   
 
|   
 
|-
 
|-
|18
+
|19
|Intraocular Spatial Awareness  
+
|Intraocular Spatial Awareness  
|instruments often in contact with capsule, iris and corneal endothelium’, blunt second hand instrument not kept in  appropriate position.
+
|Instruments often in contact with capsule, iris and corneal endothelium''''','''''
|Occasional accidental contact with  capsule, iris and corneal endothelium, sometimes has blunt second hand  instrument between the posterior capsule and the activated phaco tip.  
+
|Occasional accidental contact with  capsule, iris and corneal endothelium.  
|Rare accidental contact with capsule, iris and corneal endothelium. Often has blunt second hand  instrument between the posterior capsule and the activated phaco tip.
+
|Rare accidental contact with capsule, iris and corneal endothelium
|No accidental contact with capsule, iris and corneal  endothelium, when appropriate, a blunt, second hand instrument, is  always kept between the posterior capsule and the tip of the phaco when the  phaco is activated.
+
|No accidental contact with capsule, iris and corneal  endothelium, when appropriate,  
 
|   
 
|   
 
|-
 
|-
|19
+
|20
|Iris Protection
+
|Iris Protection
|Iris constantly at risk, handled roughly.  
+
|Iris constantly at risk, handled roughly.  
|Iris occasionally at risk. Needs help  in deciding when and how to use hooks, ring or other methods of iris protection.  
+
|Iris occasionally at risk. Needs help in deciding when and how to use hooks, ring or other methods of iris protection.
 
|Iris generally well protected. Slight  difficulty with iris hooks, ring, or other methods of iris protection.  
 
|Iris generally well protected. Slight  difficulty with iris hooks, ring, or other methods of iris protection.  
|Iris is uninjured. Iris hooks, ring, or other methods are used as needed to protect the iris.  
+
|Iris is uninjured. Iris hooks, ring, or other methods are used as needed to protect the iris.  
 
|   
 
|   
 
|-
 
|-
|20
+
|21
|Overall Speed and Fluidity of Procedure  
+
|Overall Speed and Fluidity of Procedure
|Hesitant, frequent starts and stops, not at all fluid.  
+
|Hesitant, frequent starts and stops, not at all fluid.  
|Occasional starts and stops,  inefficient and unnecessary manipulations common, case duration about 60 minutes.  
+
|Occasional starts and stops, inefficient and unnecessary manipulations common, case duration about 60 minutes.  
|Occasional inefficient and/or  unnecessary manipulations occur, case duration about 45 minutes.  
+
|Occasional inefficient and/or unnecessary manipulations occur, case duration about 45 minutes.  
 
|Inefficient and/or unnecessary  manipulations are avoided, case duration is appropriate for case difficulty.  In general, 30 minutes should be adequate.
 
|Inefficient and/or unnecessary  manipulations are avoided, case duration is appropriate for case difficulty.  In general, 30 minutes should be adequate.
 
|   
 
|   
 +
|-
 +
|22
 +
|Communication with surgical team
 +
|Does not know  role of surgical team members. Lacks confidence or has too much. Does not  establish good rapport with team. Unable to request instruments from scrub nurse using proper instrument and suture names  and/or instructions to surgical assistant are vague or nonexistent.
 +
|Knows  role of most surgical team members. Lacks confidence. Has difficulty  establishing good rapport with team members. Able to  request most instruments from scrub nurse using proper instrument and suture  names but instructions to surgical assistant are inadequate to perform  procedure safely.
 +
|Knows  role of each surgical team member. Is somewhat confident and usually treats  team with respect. Establishes good working relationship. Able to request most instruments from scrub nurse using  proper instrument and suture names in correct order. Instructions to surgical  assistant are adequate for a skilled assistant but inadequate for an  unskilled assistant.
 +
|Knows  role of each surgical team member. Is confident and treats team with respect.  Establishes good working relationship. Able to  efficiently request instruments from scrub nurse using proper names in  correct order. Able to consistently give clear instructions to surgical  assistant.
 +
|
 
|}
 
|}
 +
 +
 
Overall difficulty of procedure (circle):           Simple             Intermediate                Difficult
 
Overall difficulty of procedure (circle):           Simple             Intermediate                Difficult
  
Line 8,676: Line 9,153:
 
Good points: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 
Good points: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
  
 
+
Suggestions for development: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________
  
Suggestions for development: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
+
Agreed action: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
  
  
Agreed action: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
+
Signature of Assessor: ___________________________________        Signature of Trainee: ____________________________________
  
  
 +
'''The COECSA STRABISMUS-OSCAR'''
  
Signature of Assessor: ___________________________________        Signature of Trainee: ____________________________________
+
This should be completed at the end of the case and immediately discussed with the student to provide timely, structured, specific performance feedback. Circle the appropriate cells and if previous STARBISMUS-OSCARS are available review them in order to develop a plan for improvement
  
 +
'''COECSA Strabismus -Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubric: (COECSA STRABISMUS-OSCAR)'''
  
 
+
Resident: __________________  Evaluator: ____________________                     Date: ____________
5.2.11 rubric for ocex
 
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|
 
|
| colspan="9" | '''Rubric for    OCEX                                                                                                         OCEX  Scoring Rubric'''
 
|-
 
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |1
 
  
Does not meet
 
| colspan="2" |2
 
  
Meets some expectations
 
|3
 
  
Meets all expectations
 
| colspan="2" |4
 
  
Exceeds Expectations
+
Surgical Step
 +
|Novice
 +
 
 +
(score = 2)
 +
|Beginner
 +
 
 +
(score = 3)
 +
|Advanced Beginner
 +
 
 +
(score = 4)
 +
|Competent
 +
 
 +
(score = 5)
 +
|Not  applicable. Done by consultant or senior resident (score= 0)
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|1  
 +
|Draping
 +
|Is unable to prepare  or drape the patient using sterile technique without instruction. Unaware of  importance of identifying correct eye and muscle prior to draping.
 +
|Is able to prepare  and drape the patient but sterile technique is inconsistent. Difficulty  attaining proper head position.
 +
|Is able to  consistently prepare and drape patients using sterile technique however steps  are performed inefficiently. Attains proper head position.
 +
|Is able to  consistently and efficiently prepare and drape patients with appropriate head  position.
 
|
 
|
| colspan="9" |'''Interview  Skills'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|2
 +
|Forced  duction test
 +
|Is unaware of forced  duction testing for muscle restriction.
 +
|Is familiar with the  test but is unaware of its relevance, timing and is unable to perform it.
 +
|Is able to state the  purpose of the test and is able to perform the test at the appropriate  time(s) and detect moderate to severe restriction.
 +
|When appropriate, is able to consistently detect and  describe all degrees of rectus muscle restriction and comment on relevance to  surgical options.
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |Introduction
 
| colspan="3" |Does not  introduce him/her self
 
|Introduces self as Dr. not as resident
 
|Introduces self as resident physician
 
| colspan="2" |Introduces self to patient & family and shakes hands
 
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|3
 +
|Globe stabilization
 +
|Is able to describe one method of globe stabilization  but is unable to perform it.
 +
|Is able to describe one method of globe stabilization  but needs assistance to perform it.
 +
|Is able to perform one method of globe stabilization  with minimal verbal supervision.
 +
|Is able to perform one method of globe stabilization  without verbal supervision and with ease.
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |Chief Complaint
 
| colspan="3" |Does not elicit a CC
 
|Elicits  CC but lacks relevant details.
 
|Elicits CC & details
 
| colspan="2" |Elicits CC and subtle, relevant details
 
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|4
 +
|Conjunctival incision  & Tenon’s dissection
 +
|Is unable to describe limbal or fornix conjunctival  incision for rectus muscle surgery.
 +
|Is able to describe but not able to perform limbal or  fornix conjunctival incision for rectus muscle surgery.
 +
|Is able to perform limbal or fornix conjunctival  incisions but is inefficient and requires guidance.
 +
|Is able to  efficiently perform either limbal or fornix conjunctival incision.
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |HPI
 
| colspan="3" |Does not elicit HPI
 
|HPI lacks relevant details
 
|HPI includes most important details
 
| colspan="2" |HPI includes all relevant details
 
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|5
 +
|Hooking rectus muscle
 +
|Is unable to describe proper technique of hooking the  muscle and is unable to perform technique.
 +
|Is able to describe proper technique but unable to hook  muscle on first attempt.
 +
|Usually hooks the  muscle on first attempt but is inefficient.
 +
|Is able to  efficiently and precisely hook the muscle on first attempt.
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |Pertinent  Negatives
 
| colspan="3" |Does not  elicit pertinent negatives
 
|Elicits some pertinent negatives
 
|Elicits important pertinent negatives
 
| colspan="2" |Elicits even subtle pertinent negatives
 
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|6
 +
|Exposure  of rectus muscle
 +
|Is unable to describe proper dissection  technique to expose rectus muscle.
 +
|Is able to describe dissection technique  for muscle exposure but requires constant guidance to perform the basic  steps.
 +
|Is able  to perform basic exposure but is inefficient and/or occasionally disrupts  multiple tissue planes or branches of the anterior ciliary arteries.
 +
|Is able  to efficiently expose muscle using a combination of sharp and blunt  dissection as appropriate and avoids branches of anterior ciliary arteries.
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |Pain Inquiry
+
|-
| colspan="3" |Does not elicit.
+
|7
|Pain is elicited, not characterized
+
|Placement of suture in muscle
|Elicits scaled rating of pain (0-10)
+
|Is unable to accurately describe muscle  suture technique.
| colspan="2" |Elicits scaled rating/ relieving/exacerbating
+
|Is able to describe muscle suture technique. Multiple  attempts required to load or unload the needle-holder. Suture placement  inaccurate. Requires assistance to properly place suture.
 +
|Is able to safely secure muscle with suture but is  inefficient. May
  
factors
+
cause bleeding and muscle fiber cuts. Needs supervision  for locking bites at two ends of muscle.
|-
+
|Is able  to safely, efficiently and accurately secure the muscle with minimal tissue  trauma without supervision.
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |Allergies
 
| colspan="3" |Does not elicit.
 
|Elicits  medical allergies without symptom detail
 
|Elicits  medical allergies with symptom detail
 
| colspan="2" |Elicits medical & environmental allergies/symptoms
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |ROS
+
 
| colspan="3" |Does not elicit.
+
 
|Elicits incomplete ROS
+
8
|Elicits most important items in ROS
+
|
| colspan="2" |Leaves no stone unturned
+
 
|-
+
 
 +
Disinsertion of rectus muscle
 +
|Is unable  to describe technique for rectus muscle disinsertion.
 +
|Is able  to describe but attempts to disinsert the muscle results in inadvertently  cutting or nearly cutting the muscle suture or sclera.
 +
|Is able  to perform disinsertion but occasionally causes inappropriate bleeding or  leaves muscle tissue attached to sclera. Requires some verbal instruction.
 +
|Is able  to safely and efficiently disinsert rectus muscle.
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |Medication List
 
| colspan="3" |Does not elicit.
 
|Obtains list, no dosages/frequency
 
|Obtains list with dosages/frequency
 
| colspan="2" |Obtains list of meds/ & herbal remedies
 
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|9
 +
|Use of  caliper/scleral ruler
 +
|Is unable  to mark the sclera with calipers or does not check the caliper setting to  confirm planned action or is too aggressive with indenting the sclera with  caliper. Does not understand the potential discrepancy between arc-length and  chord-length measurement.
 +
|Is able  to mark sclera with calipers or scleral ruler but measurement is often not  perpendicular to the original rectus insertion.  Checks caliper for correct measurement. Understands arc-length vs. chord  length measurements.
 +
|Is able  to accurately mark sclera with calipers and/or scleral ruler but marks fade  because not prepared to make needle pass.
 +
|Is able  to efficiently and accurately mark sclera with calipers and/or scleral ruler  and is prepared to make needle pass immediately after marking sclera.
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |Social History
 
| colspan="3" |Does not elicit.
 
|Omits important details
 
|Obtains important details
 
| colspan="2" |Elicits even subtle relevant details
 
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|10
 +
|Reattachment  of muscle:  Intrascleral needle pass.
 +
|Is unable to describe  safe technique for intrascleral pass.
 +
|Is able to describe  safe technique for intrascleral pass but does not approach the globe with  needle directed tangentially or does not unlock needle holder before starting  the intrascleral pass. Unable to accurately obtain correct needle depth or  length.
 +
|Safely approaches the  globe with needle tip directed tangential to the globe. Visualizes needle tip  after entering the sclera and has no difficulty exiting the sclera but  intrascleral passes are frequently too short or too shallow. Minimal muscle  belly sagging.
 +
|Approaches  the globe with needle directed tangentially and intrascleral passes are  consistently of correct length and depth. No muscle belly sagging.
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |Family History
 
| colspan="3" |Does not elicit.
 
|Omits important details
 
|Obtains important details
 
| colspan="2" |Obtains subtle relevant details of family  tree
 
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|11
 +
|Conjunctival closure (when appropriate)
 +
|Is unable to close  conjunctiva. Unable to differentiate Tenon’s capsule from conjunctiva.
 +
|Is able to perform  basic conjunctival closure technique but is inefficient and requires  significant guidance. Additional sutures are required.
 +
|Is able to safely  close conjunctiva with good tissue approximation but is inefficient. .
 +
|Is able  to safely and efficiently close conjunctiva with good tissue approximation.
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |Hand Washing
 
| colspan="3" |Does not wash hands.
 
|Washes his/her hands, no soap
 
|Washes hands with soap
 
| colspan="2" |Washes hands before and after encounter
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
| colspan="9" |'''Exam'''
+
| colspan="2" |'''Global Indices'''
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|12
 +
|Maintaining  hemostasis
 +
|Is unable to describe  proper rectus muscle dissection, suture placement and disinsertion to avoid  bleeding and/or unable to describe electrocautery technique.
 +
|Can describe  techniques for avoiding and controlling bleeding but requires significant  guidance to perform proper dissection, suture placement, muscle disinsertion  and electrocautery to minimize bleeding.
 +
|Usually applies  proper tissue technique to avoid bleeding and is able to control bleeding  using electrocautery but requires multiple attempts to cauterize and may  leave burnt carbon marks.
 +
|Consistently  applies proper tissue technique to avoid bleeding and is able to efficiently  control bleeding using electrocautery.
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |Visual Acuity
 
| colspan="3" |Does not check
 
|Checks, but not best corrected
 
|Checks best corrected
 
| colspan="2" |Does additional,  appropriate testing relevant
 
 
to patient’s history/exam
 
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|13
 +
|Tissue handling
 +
|Is excessively aggressive  or timid in manipulating tissue. Inadvertent tissue damage occurs (including  significant corneal epithelium disruption).
 +
|Aware of techniques for avoidance of tissue damage and  bleeding but needs supervision to accomplish proper handling. Mild corneal  epithelium disruption may occur.
 +
|Tissue handling is  safe but sometimes requires multiple attempts to achieve desired manipulation  of tissue. Minimal corneal epithelium disruption may occur.
 +
|Tissue  handling is efficient, fluid and almost always achieves desired tissue  manipulation on first attempt.
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|14
 +
|Knowledge of instruments
 +
|Can only  identify instruments in simple terms such as “muscle hook” and “forceps” but  no knowledge of necessary sutures or needle types.
 +
|Can  identify some but not most of the surgical instruments by proper names and  can identify necessary suture sizes and materials but not needle types.
 +
|Can  identify most but not all of the surgical instruments by proper name and can  identify necessary suture sizes/materials but not needle types.
 +
|Can  identify all surgical instruments by proper names and can identify necessary  suture sizes/materials and needle types.
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|15
 +
|Technique of holding suture needle in needle holder
 +
|Frequently  loads needle incorrectly.
 +
|Loads  needle in proper direction for a forehand pass but sometimes loads  incorrectly for backhand pass. Loads too close or too far from the swaged end  of the needle.
 +
|Loads  needle properly for forehand and backhand needle pass but is inefficient and  often requires multiple attempts.
 +
|Loads  needle properly and efficiently for forehand and backhand needle passes.
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |Pupils
 
| colspan="3" |Does not check
 
|Checks light reaction, does not
 
 
swing light
 
|Checks light reaction and for RAPD
 
| colspan="2" |Does additional,  appropriate testing relevant
 
 
to patient’s history/exam
 
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|16
 +
|Technique of surgical knot tying
 +
|Unable to tie knots.
 +
|Require  multiple extra hand maneuvers to make first throw lay flat and/or loosens  first throw while attempting to perform the second throw.
 +
|Is able  to tie a flat surgeon’s knot first throw but second and third throws are  inefficient. Does not inadvertently loosen the first throw.
 +
|Is able  to efficiently tie a flat, square surgeon’s knot.
 
|
 
|
| colspan="2" |Visual Field
+
|-
| colspan="3" |Does not check
+
|17
|Confrontational VF done but
+
|Communication  with surgical team
 +
|Does not know role of surgical team members. Lacks  confidence or has too much. Does not establish good rapport with team. Unable  to request instruments from scrub nurse using  proper instrument and suture names and/or instructions to surgical assistant  are vague or nonexistent.
 +
|Knows role of most  surgical team members. Lacks confidence. Has difficulty establishing good  rapport with team members. Able to request most  instruments from scrub nurse using proper instrument and suture names but  instructions to surgical assistant are inadequate to perform procedure  safely.
 +
|Knows role of each  surgical team member. Is somewhat confident and usually treats team with  respect. Establishes good working relationship. Able  to request most instruments from scrub nurse using proper instrument and  suture names in correct order. Instructions to surgical assistant are  adequate for a skilled assistant but inadequate for an unskilled assistant.
 +
|Knows role of each  surgical team member. Is confident and treats team with respect. Establishes  good working relationship. Able to efficiently  request instruments from scrub nurse using proper names in correct order.  Able to consistently give clear instructions to surgical assistant.
 +
|
 +
|}
 +
Overall difficulty of procedure (circle):           Simple             Intermediate                Difficult
  
incompletely
 
|Confrontational visual  fields done
 
  
correctly
+
Good points: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
| colspan="2" |Does additional,  appropriate testing relevant
 
  
to patient’s history/exam
+
 
|-
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |Motility
 
| colspan="3" |Does not check
 
|Checks ductions or versions
 
|Checks ductions / versions  and alignment
 
  
in primary position
+
Suggestions for development: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
| colspan="2" |Does additional,  appropriate testing relevant
 
  
to patient’s history/exam
 
|-
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |External
 
| colspan="3" |Does not check
 
|Observes without measurements
 
|Checks lid fissures & for proptosis
 
| colspan="2" |Does additional, appropriate  testing relevant
 
  
to patient’s history/exam
+
Agreed action: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
|-
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |SLE
 
| colspan="3" |Does not check
 
|Doesn’t  check all depths of AC and/or checks only 1 eye
 
|Checks  both eyes, entire anterior segment
 
| colspan="2" |Does  additional, appropriate testing relevant to patient’s history/exam
 
|-
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |IOP
 
| colspan="3" |Does not check
 
|Poor applanation technique
 
|Checks IOP correctly OU
 
| colspan="2" |Does additional,  appropriate testing relevant
 
  
to patient’s history/exam
 
|-
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |Fundus
 
| colspan="3" |Does not check
 
|Indirect or slit lamp biomicroscopy
 
|Indirect and slit lamp biomicroscopy
 
| colspan="2" |Does additional  appropriate testing relevant
 
  
to patient’s history/exam
 
|-
 
| colspan="9" |'''Interpersonal  Skills'''
 
|
 
|-
 
| colspan="2" |
 
| colspan="2" |1
 
  
Does not meet
+
Signature of Assessor: ___________________________________        Signature of Trainee: ____________________________________
| colspan="3" |2
 
  
Meets some expectations
+
===== '''The COECSA PHACO-OSCAR''' =====
|3
+
The COECSA PHACO-OSCAR is adapted from the ICO-OSCARs available at icoph.org/ico-oscar.  It should be completed at the end of the case and immediately discussed with the student to provide timely, structured, specific performance feedback. Circle the appropriate cells and if previous PHACO-OSCARS are available review them in order to develop a plan for improvement
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="7" |  '''COECSA PHACO-Ophthalmology Surgical  Competency Assessment Rubric: Phacoemulsification (COECSA PHACO -OSCAR)'''
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="2" |Date ______
  
Meets all expectations
 
|4
 
  
Exceeds all expectations
+
Resident _______
|
 
|-
 
| colspan="2" |
 
  
  
Respectful
+
Evaluator _______
| colspan="2" |
 
  
  
Disrespectful
 
| colspan="3" |Curt,  does not listen to all of patient’s questions/concerns
 
|Listens to patient, responds to  patient questions/concerns
 
|Extremely attentive to patient’s  questions, concerns
 
|
 
|-
 
| colspan="2" |
 
  
 +
 
 +
|Novice 
  
Understandable
+
(score  = 2)
| colspan="2" |Constantly uses medical jargon the
+
|Beginner  
  
patient doesn’t understand
+
(score = 3)
| colspan="3" |
+
|Advanced  Beginner
  
 +
(score  = 4)
 +
|Competent 
  
Occasionally uses medical jargon the patient doesn’t understand
+
(score = 5)
|
+
|Not  applicable. Done by consultant or senior resident
  
 
+
(score=  0)
Avoids or  explains medical terms when used
+
|-
|Avoids or explains medical terms when used and frequently asks whether they are understood
+
|1
|
+
|Draping: 
 +
|Unable to start draping without help.
 +
|Drapes with minimal verbal  instruction. Incomplete lash coverage.
 +
|Lashes mostly covered, drape at most  minimally obstructing view.
 +
|Lashes completely covered and clear of  incision site, drape not obstructing view.
 +
 +
|-
 +
|2
 +
|Incision &  Paracentesis: Formation  & Technique
 +
|Inappropriate incision architecture,  location, and size.
 +
|Leakage and/or iris prolapse with  local pressure, provides poor surgical access to and visibility of capsule and bag.
 +
|Incision either well-placed or  non-leaking but not both.
 +
|Incision parallel to iris, self  sealing, adequate size, provides good access for surgical maneuvering.
 +
| 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |Explained  Findings
+
|3
| colspan="2" |
+
|Viscoelastic:
  
 +
Appropriate Use and Safe Insertion   
 +
|Unsure of when, what type and how much  viscoelastic to use. Has difficulty accessing anterior chamber through  paracentesis.
  
No explanation
+
.
| colspan="3" |
+
|Requires minimal instruction. Knows  when to use but administers incorrect amount or type.
 
+
|Requires no instruction. Uses at  appropriate time. Administers adequate amount and type. Cannula tip in good  position. Unsure of correct viscoelastic if multiple types available.
 
+
|Viscoelastics are administered in  appropriate amount and at the appropriate time with cannula tip clear of lens  capsule and endothelium. Appropriate viscoelastic is used if multiple types  of viscoelastics are available.
Cursory explanation
+
|
+
|-
 
+
|4
 
+
|Capsulorrhexis:  Commencement of Flap & follow-through. 
Thoroughly explained all pertinent findings
+
|Instruction required,  tentative, chases rather than controls rhexis, cortex disruption may occur. 
|Thoroughly explained all findings and used models/photos
+
|Minimal instruction,  predominantly in control with occasional loss of control of rhexis, cortex  disruption may occur.
|
+
|In control, few awkward or repositioning movements, no cortex disruption.
 +
|Delicate approach and confident control of the rhexis, no cortex  disruption.
 +
| 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |Explained Diagnosis
+
|5
| colspan="2" |
+
|Capsulorrhexis:  
  
 +
Formation and Circular  Completion
 +
|Size and position are  inadequate for nucleus density & type of implant, tear may occur.
 +
|Size and position are  barely adequate for nucleus density and implant type, difficulty achieving  circular rhexis, tear may occur.
 +
|Size and position are  almost exact for nucleus density and implant type, shows control, requires  only minimal instruction.
 +
|Adequate size and position for nucleus  density & type of implant, no tears, rapid,  unaided control of radialization, maintains control of the flap and AC  depth throughout the capsulorrhexis.
 +
 +
|-
 +
|6
 +
|Hydrodissection: Visible  Fluid Wave and Free  Nuclear Rotation
 +
|Hydrodissection fluid not injected in  quantity nor place to achieve nucleus rotation.
 +
|Multiple attempts  required, able to rotate nucleus somewhat but not completely.  Tries to manually force rotation before adequate hydrodissection.
 +
|Fluid injected in  appropriate location, able to rotate nucleus but encounters more than minimal  resistance.
 +
|Ideally see free fluid  wave but adequate if free nuclear rotation with minimal resistance is  achieved. Aware of contraindications to  hydrodissection.
 +
 +
|-
 +
|7
 +
|Phacoemulsification  Probe and Second  Instrument: Insertion Into Eye
 +
|Has great difficulty  inserting the probe or second instrument, AC collapses, may damage wound,  capsule or Descemet’s membrane
 +
|Inserts the probe or  second instrument after some failed attempts, may damage wound, capsule or  Descemet’s membrane.
 +
|Inserts probe and second  instrument on first attempt with mild difficulty, no damage to wound, capsule  or Descemet’s membrane.
 +
|Smoothly inserts  instruments into the eye without damaging the wound or Descemet's membrane. 
  
No explanation
 
| colspan="3" |
 
  
 +
 +
|-
 +
|8
 +
|Phacoemulsification  Probe and Second  Instrument: Effective Use and Stability
 +
|Tip frequently not  visible, has much difficulty keeping the eye in primary position and uses  excessive force to do so.
 +
|Tip often not visible,  often requires manipulation to keep eye in primary position.
  
Cursory explanation
+
 
|
+
|Maintains visibility of  tip at most times, eye is generally kept in primary position with mild  depression or pulling on the globe.
 +
|Maintains visibility of  instrument tips at all times, keeps the eye in primary position without  depressing or pulling up the globe.
 +
 +
|-
 +
|9
 +
|Nucleus: 
  
 
+
Sculpting or Primary  Chop
Thoroughly explained diagnosis
+
|Frequently incorrect  power used during sculpting, applies power at inappropriate times, excessive  phaco probe movement causes constant eye/nucleus movement, unable to  engage nucleus (chop method) or the groove is of inadequate depth or width  (divide and conquer), cannot control Phacodynamics.  Unable to correctly work foot pedals.
|Thoroughly explained diagnosis and used models/photos
+
|Moderate error in power  used while sculpting, tentative, frequent eye/nucleus movement produced by  phaco tip, difficult to engage nucleus (chop technique) or groove adequately after many attempts (divide and conquer), poor control of phacodynamics with  frequent anterior chamber depth fluctuations. Has difficulty working foot  pedals.
|
+
|Uses correct power with  minimal error when sculpting, occasional eye/nucleus movement caused by  phaco tip, some difficulty in engaging or holding nucleus (chop method)  or groove adequate  with minimal repeat attempts,  fairly good  control of phacodynamics with occasional anterior chamber depth change.  Minimal mistakes using foot pedals.
 +
|Sculpting is performed  using adequate ultrasound power regulated by the pedal, with forward  movements that do not change the eye position or push the nucleus, the  nucleus is safely engaged (with chop method) or the groove is appropriate in  depth and width (divide and conquer technique), phacodynamics are controlled  as evidenced by the internal anterior chamber environment.  Adept at foot pedal control.
 +
| 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |Explained Plan
+
|10
| colspan="2" |No explanation
+
|Nucleus:  Rotation and Manipulation
| colspan="3" |Cursory explanation
+
|Unable to rotate  nucleus.
|Thoroughly explained plan
+
|Able to rotate nucleus partially  and with zonular stress.
|Thoroughly explained plan and scheduled tests
+
|Able to rotate nucleus  fully but with zonular stress. 
|
+
|Nucleus is safely and efficiently manipulated producing minimal stress on zonules and globe. 
 +
| 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |Asked if Patient Had Questions.
+
|11
| colspan="2" |
+
|Nucleus: Cracking or Chopping With Safe  Phacoemulsification of Segments
  
  
Does not ask
+
|'''CRACKING''': Grooves are not centered or deep enough and go into epinucleus, nucleus is constantly displaced from central position, unable to crack nucleus at all, eye constantly moving.
| colspan="3" |Asked if patient had questions but didn’t answer completely
 
|Asked if patient had questions and answered questions thoroughly
 
|Asked if patient & family had questions. And answered thoroughly. Gave phone # for
 
  
patient to call with  questions
+
'''CHOPPING:''' Always  endangers or engages adjacent tissue, unable to accomplish chop of any piece.
|
 
|-
 
| colspan="9" |'''Case  Presentation'''
 
|
 
|-
 
| colspan="2" |Concise/Clarity
 
| colspan="2" |Unintelligible
 
| colspan="3" |Somewhat Disorganized
 
|Clear, concise, organized
 
|Meticulous, exact, succinct but complete
 
|
 
|-
 
| colspan="2" |
 
  
 +
'''SEGMENT PHACOEMULSIFICATION''': produces significant wound burn, great difficulty pursuing  fragments around the anterior chamber and into the bag, poor awareness of  second instrument tip and difficulty keeping the second hand instrument under the phaco tip, 
 +
|'''CRACKING''': Some grooves  are centered and deep enough and some go into epinucleus, displaces nucleus  in most grooves, attempts to split nucleus with instruments too shallow in  groove, able to crack portion of nucleus, eye often moving.
  
Pertinent Facts
+
'''CHOPPING:''' endangers  or engages adjacent tissue in most chops''','''  able to accomplish chop of some pieces.
| colspan="2" |
 
  
 +
'''SEGMENT PHACOEMULSIFICATION''': produces light wound burn, pursues most fragments around the  AC and into the bag, the second  hand instrument is sometimes under the phaco tip
 +
|'''CRACKING''': Most grooves  are centered and deep enough, rarely goes into epinucleus, rarely displaces  nucleus, sometimes attempts to split in mid-nucleus but succeeds, eye usually  in primary position.
  
Omits pertinent facts
+
'''CHOPPING:''' endangers  or engages adjacent tissue in some chops''','''  able to accomplish chop of most pieces. 
| colspan="3" |
 
  
 +
'''SEGMENT PHACOEMULSIFICATION''': produces minimal wound burn, pursues some fragments around the  AC and into the bag, the second  hand instrument is usually under the phaco tip
 +
|'''CRACKING''': Grooves are  centered, deep enough to ensure cracking, length does not reach epinucleus,  nucleus is not displaced from central position, places instruments deep  enough to easily and successfully crack nucleus, eye stays in primary  position.
  
Omits minor supporting facts
+
'''CHOPPING:''' Nucleus  engaged and vertical or horizontal chop technique undertaken with no  inadvertent engagement of adjacent tissue (especially capsule). Full  thickness nuclear chop of all pieces in a controlled and fluid manner. 
|
 
  
 +
'''SEGMENT PHACOEMULSIFICATION''': No wound burns, Pieces are "floated" to the tip  without "pursuing" the fragments around the anterior chamber and  the bag, The second hand instrument is kept under the phaco tip to prevent  posterior capsule contact if surge arises.
 +
 +
|-
 +
|12
 +
|Irrigation and Aspiration Technique
  
Covers all pertinent facts
+
With Adequate Removal of Cortex
|Covers all pertinent facts and omits all irrelevant data
+
|Great difficulty introducing the  aspiration tip under the capsulorrhexis border, aspiration hole position not  controlled, cannot regulate aspiration flow as needed, cannot peel cortical  material adequately, engages capsule or iris with aspiration port.
|
+
|Moderate difficulty introducing  aspiration tip under capsulorrhexis and maintaining hole up position,  attempts to aspirate without occluding tip, shows poor comprehension of aspiration dynamics, cortical peeling  is not well controlled, jerky and slow, capsule potentially compromised. prolonged attempts result in minimal  residual cortical material.
 +
|Minimal difficulty introducing the  aspiration tip under the capsulorrhexis, aspiration hole usually up, cortex  will engaged for 360 degrees, cortical peeling slow, few technical errors,  minimal residual cortical material.
 +
|Aspiration tip is introduced under the  free border of the capsulorrhexis in irrigation mode with the aspiration hole  up, Aspiration is activated in just enough flow as to occlude the tip,  efficiently removes all cortex, The cortical material is peeled gently  towards the center of the pupil, tangentially in cases of zonular weakness.
 +
| 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |Pertinent Positives & Negatives
+
|13
| colspan="2" |
+
|Lens Insertion,  Rotation, and Final
  
 
+
Position of Intraocular  Lens
Does not mention
+
|Unable to insert IOL, unable to  produce adequate incision for implant type '''NON-FOLDABLE:''' unable to place the lower haptic in the capsular bag, unable to rotate the upper haptic into place '''FOLDABLE:  ''' unable to load IOL into injector or forcep, no control of lens  injection, doesn't control tip  placement, lens is not in the capsular bag or is injected upside down. 
| colspan="3" |
+
|Insertion and manipulation  of IOL is difficult, eye handled roughly, anterior chamber  not stable, repeated attempts result in borderline incision for implant  type '''NON-FOLDABLE:''' repeated  hesitant attempts result in lower haptic in the capsular bag, upper haptic is rotated into place but with excessive force on  capsulorrhexis and zonules and repeated attempts are necessary '''FOLDABLE:'''  difficulty loading IOL  into  injector or forcep,, hesitant,  poor control of lens injection, difficulty  controlling tip placement, excessive  manipulation required to get both haptics into capsular bag.
 
+
|Insertion and manipulation  of IOL is accomplished with minimal anterior chamber instability, incision just adequate for implant type '''NON-FOLDABLE:''' the lower haptic is placed inside the capsular bag with some  difficulty, upper haptic is rotated into  place with some stress on the capsulorrhexis and zonule fibers '''FOLDABLE:''' , minimal difficulty loading IOL into injector of forcep,  hesitant but good control of lens injection, minimal difficulty controlling tip placement,  both  haptics are in the capsular bag.
 
+
|Insertion and manipulation  of IOL is performed in a deep and stable anterior chamber and capsular bag,  with incision appropriate for implant type.  '''NON-FOLDABLE''': The lower haptic is smoothly placed inside the capsular  bag; the upper haptic is rotated into place without exerting excessive stress  to the capsulorrhexis or the zonule fibers.  '''FOLDABLE''':  Able to load IOL into injector or forcep,  lens is injected in a controlled fashion, fixation of IOL is  symmetric; the optic and both haptics are inside the capsular bag. 
Mentions some pertinent  positives & negatives
+
|
+
|-
 
+
|14
 
+
|Wound Closure (Including  Suturing, Hydration, and  Checking Security as Required)
Covers all pertinent positives & negatives
+
|If suturing is needed,  instruction is required and stitches are placed in an awkward, slow fashion  with much difficulty, astigmatism, bent needles, incomplete suture rotation  and wound leakage may result, unable to remove  viscoelastics thoroughly. unable to make incision water tight or does not  check wound for seal.  Improper final  IOP.
|
+
|If suturing is needed,  stitches are placed with some difficulty, resuturing may be needed,  questionable wound closure with probable astigmatism, instruction may be needed, questionable whether all viscoelastics are thoroughly removed, Extra maneuvers are  required to make the incision water tight at the end of the surgery.  May have improper IOP.
 
+
|If suturing is needed, stitches  are placed with minimal difficulty  tight enough to maintain the wound  closed, may have slight astigmatism, viscoelastics are adequately removed  after this step with some difficulty, The incision is checked and is water  tight or needs minimal adjustment at the end of the surgery.  May have improper IOP.
 
+
|If suturing is needed, stitches are  placed tight enough to maintain the wound closed, but not too tight as to induce astigmatism, viscoelastics are thoroughly removed after this step, the  incision is checked and is water tight at the end of the surgery.  Proper final IOP.
Covers all pertinent positives & negatives, and omits irrelevant data
+
| 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |Differential Diagnosis
 
| colspan="2" |
 
 
 
Does not mention
 
| colspan="3" |Provides basic but  incomplete differential Dx
 
 
|
 
|
 
+
|'''Global  Indices'''
 
 
Provides appropriate differential Dx
 
 
|
 
|
  
  
Exhaustive differential Dx and cites literature
 
 
|
 
|
|-
 
| colspan="2" |
 
 
 
Appropriate Plan
 
| colspan="2" |
 
 
 
Does not mention
 
| colspan="3" |
 
 
 
Provides basic but incomplete plan
 
 
|
 
|
 
 
Provides appropriate plan
 
 
|
 
|
 
 
Provides detailed plan and cites literature
 
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="2" |Response to
+
|15
 
+
|Wound Neutrality and Minimizing  Eye Rolling and Corneal Distortion
Attending
+
|Nearly constant eye movement and  corneal distortion.
| colspan="2" |Inappropriate
+
|Eye often not in primary position,  frequent distortion folds.
| colspan="3" |Listens but little response
+
|Eye usually in primary position, mild  corneal distortion folds occur.
|Listens and responds appropriately
+
|The eye is kept in primary position  during the surgery. No distortion folds are produced. The length and location  of incisions prevents distortion of the cornea.
|Responds appropriately and cites relevant
+
| 
 
 
literature
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|16
|
+
|Eye Positioned Centrally  Within Microscope  View
|
+
|Constantly requires repositioning.
|
+
|Occasional repositioning required.
|
+
|Mild fluctuation in pupil position.
|
+
|The pupil is kept centered during the  surgery.
|
+
| 
|
+
|-
|
+
|17
|
+
|Conjunctival and Corneal  Tissue Handling
 +
|Tissue handling is rough and damage  occurs.
 +
|Tissue handling borderline, minimal  damage occurs.
 +
|Tissue handling decent but potential  for damage exists.
 +
|Tissue is not damaged nor at  risk by handling.
 +
 +
|-
 +
|18
 +
|Intraocular Spatial Awareness
 +
|instruments often in contact with capsule, iris and corneal  endothelium’, blunt second hand instrument not kept in  appropriate position.
 +
|Occasional accidental contact with  capsule, iris and corneal endothelium, sometimes has blunt second hand  instrument between the posterior capsule and the activated phaco tip.
 +
|Rare accidental contact with  capsule, iris and corneal endothelium. Often has blunt second hand  instrument between the posterior capsule and the activated phaco tip.
 +
|No accidental contact with capsule, iris and corneal  endothelium, when appropriate, a blunt, second hand instrument, is  always kept between the posterior capsule and the tip of the phaco when the  phaco is activated.
 +
 +
|-
 +
|19
 +
|Iris Protection 
 +
|Iris constantly at risk, handled  roughly.
 +
|Iris occasionally at risk. Needs help  in deciding when and how to use hooks, ring or other methods of iris  protection.
 +
|Iris generally well protected. Slight  difficulty with iris hooks, ring, or other methods of iris protection.
 +
|Iris is uninjured. Iris hooks,  ring, or other methods are used as needed to protect the iris.
 +
 +
|-
 +
|20
 +
|Overall Speed and  Fluidity of Procedure
 +
|Hesitant, frequent starts and stops,  not at all fluid.
 +
|Occasional starts and stops,  inefficient and unnecessary manipulations common, case duration about 60  minutes.
 +
|Occasional inefficient and/or  unnecessary manipulations occur, case duration about 45 minutes.
 +
|Inefficient and/or unnecessary  manipulations are avoided, case duration is appropriate for case difficulty.  In general, 30 minutes should be adequate.
 +
 
|}
 
|}
5.2.12 coecsa-ocex
+
Overall difficulty of procedure (circle):           Simple             Intermediate                Difficult
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Good points: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Suggestions for development: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
  
'''COECSA Ophthalmic Clinical Evaluation Exercise (COECSA-OCEX)'''
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|
 
  
 +
Agreed action: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
  
The OCEX is an observed encounter between a    resident and a new patient. The evaluator should be present in the exam    room for the entire interaction. The intent is to rate the resident in all    the categories listed below compared to a graduating resident and    then provide immediate performance feedback. The rating system is:
 
  
    1    -  Does Not Meet Expectations     2 – Meets Some Expectations       3 - Meets All Expectations
 
  
                     4 – Exceeds Expectations                   na -  Not Applicable
+
Signature of Assessor: ___________________________________        Signature of Trainee: ____________________________________
|}
+
 
<span lang="FR">PC-2 Patient
+
 
Examination </span>
+
===== Rubric for ocex =====
<span lang="FR">PC-2 Patient
+
{| class="wikitable"
Examination </span>
+
|
{| class="wikitable"
+
| colspan="9" | '''Rubric for    OCEX                                                                                                         OCEX Scoring Rubric'''
| colspan="13" |'''Interview Skills'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
|'''1. Introduced self'''
+
|
|'''1'''
+
| colspan="2" |
|'''2'''
+
| colspan="2" |1
|'''3'''
+
 
|'''4'''
+
Does not meet
|'''na'''
+
| colspan="2" |2
| rowspan="6" |
+
 
|'''7. Review of systems'''
+
Meets some expectations
|'''1'''
+
|3
|'''2'''
+
 
|'''3'''
+
Meets all expectations
|'''4'''
+
| colspan="2" |4
|'''na'''
+
 
 +
Exceeds Expectations
 
|-
 
|-
|'''2.  Obtained chief complaint'''
+
|
|'''1'''
+
| colspan="9" |'''Interview  Skills'''
|'''2'''
 
|'''3'''
 
|'''4'''
 
|'''na'''
 
|'''8. Med list'''
 
|'''1'''
 
|'''2'''
 
|'''3'''
 
|'''4'''
 
|'''na'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
|'''3.  History of present illness'''
+
|
|'''1'''
+
| colspan="2" |Introduction
|'''2'''
+
| colspan="3" |Does not  introduce him/her self
|'''3'''
+
|Introduces self as Dr. not as resident
|'''4'''
+
|Introduces self as resident physician
|'''na'''
+
| colspan="2" |Introduces self to patient & family and shakes hands
|'''9. Past medical history'''
 
|'''1'''
 
|'''2'''
 
|'''3'''
 
|'''4'''
 
|'''na'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
|'''4.  Pertinent negatives'''
+
|
|'''1'''
+
| colspan="2" |Chief Complaint
|'''2'''
+
| colspan="3" |Does not elicit a CC
|'''3'''
+
|Elicits  CC but lacks relevant details.
|'''4'''
+
|Elicits CC & details
|'''na'''
+
| colspan="2" |Elicits CC and subtle, relevant details
|'''10. Social history'''
 
|'''1'''
 
|'''2'''
 
|'''3'''
 
|'''4'''
 
|'''na'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
|'''5. Pain inquiry'''
+
|
|'''1'''
+
| colspan="2" |HPI
|'''2'''
+
| colspan="3" |Does not elicit HPI
|'''3'''
+
|HPI lacks relevant details
|'''4'''
+
|HPI includes most important details
|'''na'''
+
| colspan="2" |HPI includes all relevant details
|'''11. Family history'''
 
|'''1'''
 
|'''2'''
 
|'''3'''
 
|'''4'''
 
|'''Na'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
|'''6.  Allergies'''
+
|
|'''1'''
+
| colspan="2" |Pertinent  Negatives
|'''2'''
+
| colspan="3" |Does not  elicit pertinent negatives
|'''3'''
+
|Elicits some pertinent negatives
|'''4'''
+
|Elicits important pertinent negatives
|'''na'''
+
| colspan="2" |Elicits even subtle pertinent negatives
|'''12. Washed hands'''
 
|'''1'''
 
|'''2'''
 
|'''3'''
 
|'''4'''
 
|'''Na'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="13" |'''Examination'''
+
|
 +
| colspan="2" |Pain Inquiry
 +
| colspan="3" |Does not elicit.
 +
|Pain is elicited, not characterized
 +
|Elicits scaled rating of pain (0-10)
 +
| colspan="2" |Elicits scaled rating/ relieving/exacerbating
 +
 
 +
factors
 
|-
 
|-
|'''1. Best  corrected Va'''
+
|
|'''1'''
+
| colspan="2" |Allergies
|'''2'''
+
| colspan="3" |Does not elicit.
|'''3'''
+
|Elicits  medical allergies without symptom detail
|'''4'''
+
|Elicits  medical allergies with symptom detail
|'''na'''
+
| colspan="2" |Elicits medical & environmental allergies/symptoms
| rowspan="4" |
 
|'''5. External'''
 
|'''1'''
 
|'''2'''
 
|'''3'''
 
|'''4'''
 
|'''na'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
|'''2.  Pupils / RAPD'''
+
|
|'''1'''
+
| colspan="2" |ROS
|'''2'''
+
| colspan="3" |Does not elicit.
|'''3'''
+
|Elicits incomplete ROS
|'''4'''
+
|Elicits most important items in ROS
|'''na'''
+
| colspan="2" |Leaves no stone unturned
|'''6. SLE'''
 
|'''1'''
 
|'''2'''
 
|'''3'''
 
|'''4'''
 
|'''na'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
|'''3.  Visual Fields'''
+
|
|'''1'''
+
| colspan="2" |Medication List
|'''2'''
+
| colspan="3" |Does not elicit.
|'''3'''
+
|Obtains list, no dosages/frequency
|'''4'''
+
|Obtains list with dosages/frequency
|'''na'''
+
| colspan="2" |Obtains list of meds/ & herbal remedies
|'''7. IOP (+/- gonioscopy)'''
 
|'''1'''
 
|'''2'''
 
|'''3'''
 
|'''4'''
 
|'''na'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
|'''4.  Motility'''
+
|
|'''1'''
+
| colspan="2" |Social History
|'''2'''
+
| colspan="3" |Does not elicit.
|'''3'''
+
|Omits important details
|'''4'''
+
|Obtains important details
|'''na'''
+
| colspan="2" |Elicits even subtle relevant details
|'''8. Funduscopy'''
 
|'''1'''
 
|'''2'''
 
|'''3'''
 
|'''4'''
 
|'''na'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="13" |'''Interpersonal Skills / Professionalism'''
+
|
 +
| colspan="2" |Family History
 +
| colspan="3" |Does not elicit.
 +
|Omits important details
 +
|Obtains important details
 +
| colspan="2" |Obtains subtle relevant details of family  tree
 
|-
 
|-
|'''1.  Empathetic'''
+
|
|'''1'''
+
| colspan="2" |Hand Washing
|'''2'''
+
| colspan="3" |Does not wash hands.
|'''3'''
+
|Washes his/her hands, no soap
|'''4'''
+
|Washes hands with soap
|'''na'''
+
| colspan="2" |Washes hands before and after encounter
| rowspan="3" |
 
|'''5. Explained diagnosis'''
 
|'''1'''
 
|'''2'''
 
|'''3'''
 
|'''4'''
 
|'''na'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
|'''2. Respectful & courteous'''
+
|
|'''1'''
+
| colspan="9" |'''Exam'''
|'''2'''
 
|'''3'''
 
|'''4'''
 
|'''na'''
 
|'''6. Explained plan/options'''
 
|'''1'''
 
|'''2'''
 
|'''3'''
 
|'''4'''
 
|'''na'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
|'''3. Used language the pt'''
+
|
 +
| colspan="2" |Visual Acuity
 +
| colspan="3" |Does not check
 +
|Checks, but not best corrected
 +
|Checks best corrected
 +
| colspan="2" |Does additional,  appropriate testing relevant
  
'''Understands'''
+
to patient’s history/exam
|'''1'''
+
|-
|'''2'''
+
|
|'''3'''
+
| colspan="2" |Pupils
|'''4'''
+
| colspan="3" |Does not check
|'''na'''
+
|Checks light reaction, does not
|'''7. Asked if patient had'''
+
 
 +
swing light
 +
|Checks light reaction and for RAPD
 +
| colspan="2" |Does additional,  appropriate testing relevant
  
'''questions'''
+
to patient’s history/exam
|'''1'''
 
|'''2'''
 
|'''3'''
 
|'''4'''
 
|'''na'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
|'''4. Explained findings'''
+
|
|'''1'''
+
| colspan="2" |Visual Field
|'''2'''
+
| colspan="3" |Does not check
|'''3'''
+
|Confrontational VF done but
|'''4'''
+
 
|'''na'''
+
incompletely
| colspan="7" |
+
|Confrontational visual  fields done
 +
 
 +
correctly
 +
| colspan="2" |Does additional,  appropriate testing relevant
 +
 
 +
to patient’s history/exam
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="13" |'''Case Presentation'''
+
|
 +
| colspan="2" |Motility
 +
| colspan="3" |Does not check
 +
|Checks ductions or versions
 +
|Checks ductions / versions  and alignment
 +
 
 +
in primary position
 +
| colspan="2" |Does additional,  appropriate testing relevant
 +
 
 +
to patient’s history/exam
 
|-
 
|-
|'''1.  Concise & clear'''
+
|
|'''1'''
+
| colspan="2" |External
|'''2'''
+
| colspan="3" |Does not check
|'''3'''
+
|Observes without measurements
|'''4'''
+
|Checks lid fissures & for proptosis
|'''na'''
+
| colspan="2" |Does additional, appropriate  testing relevant
| rowspan="3" |
+
 
|'''4. Appropriate differential Dx'''
+
to patient’s history/exam
|'''1'''
 
|'''2'''
 
|'''3'''
 
|'''4'''
 
|'''na'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
|'''2. Pertinent facts'''
+
|
|'''1'''
+
| colspan="2" |SLE
|'''2'''
+
| colspan="3" |Does not check
|'''3'''
+
|Doesn’t  check all depths of AC and/or checks only 1 eye
|'''4'''
+
|Checks  both eyes, entire anterior segment
|'''na'''
+
| colspan="2" |Does  additional, appropriate testing relevant to patient’s history/exam
|'''5. Appropriate plan'''
 
|'''1'''
 
|'''2'''
 
|'''3'''
 
|'''4'''
 
|'''na'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
|'''3. Pertinent pos & negs'''
+
|
|'''1'''
+
| colspan="2" |IOP
|'''2'''
+
| colspan="3" |Does not check
|'''3'''
+
|Poor applanation technique
|'''4'''
+
|Checks IOP correctly OU
|'''na'''
+
| colspan="2" |Does additional,  appropriate testing relevant
|'''6. Response to attending’s'''
 
  
'''questions/suggestions'''
+
to patient’s history/exam
|'''1'''
+
|-
|'''2'''
+
|
|'''3'''
+
| colspan="2" |Fundus
|'''4'''
+
| colspan="3" |Does not check
|'''na'''
+
|Indirect or slit lamp biomicroscopy
|}
+
|Indirect and slit lamp biomicroscopy
Comments:                                                                                                                                                                    
+
| colspan="2" |Does additional  appropriate testing relevant
  
                                                                                                                                                                                       
+
to patient’s history/exam
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="9" |'''Interpersonal  Skills'''
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="2" |
 +
| colspan="2" |1
  
                                                                                                                                                                                       
+
Does not meet
 +
| colspan="3" |2
  
 +
Meets some expectations
 +
|3
  
We have reviewed this OCEX together.                 Resident initials:                        Date:          
+
Meets all expectations
 +
|4
  
 +
Exceeds all expectations
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="2" |
  
Evaluator initials:             
 
  
 +
Respectful
 +
| colspan="2" |
  
  
 +
Disrespectful
 +
| colspan="3" |Curt,  does not listen to all of patient’s questions/concerns
 +
|Listens to patient, responds to  patient questions/concerns
 +
|Extremely attentive to patient’s  questions, concerns
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="2" |
  
  
 +
Understandable
 +
| colspan="2" |Constantly  uses medical jargon the
  
 +
patient  doesn’t understand
 +
| colspan="3" |
  
  
 +
Occasionally  uses medical jargon the patient doesn’t understand
 +
|
  
  
 +
Avoids or  explains medical terms when used
 +
|Avoids or explains medical terms  when used and frequently asks whether they are understood
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="2" |Explained  Findings
 +
| colspan="2" |
  
  
 +
No explanation
 +
| colspan="3" |
  
  
'''''5.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE TOOLS'''''
+
Cursory explanation
 +
|
  
5.3.1 coecsa ophthalmology trainees personal details form
 
  
 +
Thoroughly explained all pertinent findings
 +
|Thoroughly explained all findings  and used models/photos
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="2" |Explained  Diagnosis
 +
| colspan="2" |
  
'''COECSA OPHTHALMOLOGY TRAINEES PERSONAL DETAILS FORM'''
 
  
 +
No explanation
 +
| colspan="3" |
  
{| class="wikitable"
 
|Photo
 
|}
 
  
 +
Cursory explanation
 +
|
  
  
 +
Thoroughly explained diagnosis
 +
|Thoroughly explained diagnosis  and used models/photos
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="2" |Explained Plan
 +
| colspan="2" |No explanation
 +
| colspan="3" |Cursory explanation
 +
|Thoroughly explained plan
 +
|Thoroughly  explained plan and scheduled tests
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="2" |Asked if  Patient Had Questions.
 +
| colspan="2" |
  
  
 +
Does not ask
 +
| colspan="3" |Asked if  patient had questions but didn’t answer completely
 +
|Asked if  patient had questions and answered questions thoroughly
 +
|Asked if patient & family had  questions. And answered thoroughly. Gave phone # for
  
 +
patient to call with  questions
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="9" |'''Case  Presentation'''
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="2" |Concise/Clarity
 +
| colspan="2" |Unintelligible
 +
| colspan="3" |Somewhat Disorganized
 +
|Clear, concise, organized
 +
|Meticulous, exact, succinct but complete
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="2" |
  
  
Family Name (Surname): _________________________   Forenames: _______________________
+
Pertinent Facts
 
+
| colspan="2" |
 
 
Sex: _________________      Date of Birth:  _______________________
 
 
 
 
 
Residency Program Site: ___________________________________________________________________
 
 
 
 
 
  
Residency Start date: ­­­­­­­­­­______________________________________________________________________
 
  
 +
Omits pertinent facts
 +
| colspan="3" |
  
Summative Exams Passed and date: (e.g. UoN Part 1 and part 2):
 
  
___________________________________________________________________________________
+
Omits minor supporting facts
 +
|
  
___________________________________________________________________________________
 
  
 +
Covers all pertinent facts
 +
|Covers  all pertinent facts and omits all irrelevant data
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="2" |Pertinent Positives & Negatives
 +
| colspan="2" |
  
  
 +
Does not mention
 +
| colspan="3" |
  
Contact Details:
 
  
Email 1: _________________________________________________________________________________
+
Mentions some pertinent  positives & negatives
 +
|
  
Email 2: _________________________________________________________________________________
 
  
Telephone 1: ____________________________________________________________________________
+
Covers all pertinent positives & negatives
 +
|
  
Telephone 2: ____________________________________________________________________________
 
  
I certify that all information presented for the annual review is correct and a true reflection of my training experience
+
Covers all pertinent positives &  negatives, and omits irrelevant data
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="2" |Differential Diagnosis
 +
| colspan="2" |
  
Signed__________________________________________________________ Date____________________
 
'''''5.2 COECSA WORKPLACE BASED ASSESSMENTS'''''
 
  
5.2.1 Clinical Rating Scale
+
Does not mention
 +
| colspan="3" |Provides basic but  incomplete differential Dx
 +
|
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Provides appropriate differential Dx
 +
|
 +
 
  
{| class="wikitable"
+
Exhaustive differential Dx and cites literature
|'''CRS'''
+
|
| colspan="2" |'''Learning Outcome'''
 
|'''Target Year (TYA)<sup>#</sup>'''
 
|'''Assessor*'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
|CRS1
+
| colspan="2" |
|CA1
+
 
|Consultation
+
 
|1 annual review
+
Appropriate Plan
|Cons
+
| colspan="2" |
|-
+
 
|CRS2
+
 
|CA2
+
Does not mention
|Vision
+
| colspan="3" |
|1
 
|Cons/AHP
 
|-
 
|CRS3
 
|CA3
 
|Fields
 
|1
 
|Cons
 
|-
 
|CRS4
 
|CA4
 
|External eye
 
|1
 
|Cons
 
|-
 
|CRS5
 
|CA5
 
|Pupil
 
|1
 
|Cons
 
|-
 
|CRS6
 
|CA6
 
|Ocular motility
 
|2
 
|Cons
 
|-
 
|CRS7
 
|CA7
 
|IOP
 
|1
 
|Cons/AHP
 
|-
 
|CRS8
 
|CA8
 
|Slit lamp
 
|1
 
|Cons
 
|-
 
|CRS9a, CRS9b
 
  
CRS9c,  CRS9d
 
|CA9
 
|Fundus
 
|2
 
|Cons
 
|-
 
|CRSret
 
|PS2
 
|Retinoscopy (Paed)
 
|3
 
|Cons/Optometrist
 
|}
 
<nowiki>*</nowiki> Assessors:
 
  
* Cons: consultant ophthalmologist
+
Provides basic but incomplete plan
* AHP: appropriately trained allied health professional (nurse, orthoptist,    optometrist)
+
|
  
  
5.2.1.1 Clinical Rating Scale CRS1 (Outcome CA1: CLINICAL HISTORY)
+
Provides appropriate plan
 +
|
  
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 
  
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRS1      (Outcome CA1-Clinical History)'''
+
Provides detailed plan and cites literature
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
| colspan="2" |Response to
  
All trainees must be able to take a clinical history from a patient, which is appropriate for the clinical problem and the individual patient’s needs.
+
Attending
 +
| colspan="2" |Inappropriate
 +
| colspan="3" |Listens but little response
 +
|Listens and responds appropriately
 +
|Responds appropriately and cites relevant
  
 
+
literature
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                                       Date (dd/mm/yyyy)          
 
 
 
YEAR 1                                       YEAR 2                           YEAR 3                    YEAR 4          Other (specify)
 
 
 
Assessor's name                                                                                          Type of assessment:  Formative        Summative                                                              
 
 
 
 
 
Assessor's status           Consultant                       Senior Trainee              Other (Specify)
 
 
 
Brief description of case                                       
 
 
 
'''Please grade the following areas using the scale below''' (use tick or cross)
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Attitude and manner'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' introduce themselves and establish the name  of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer). Their  demeanour throughout the interview shows that they are actively listening to  the patient by gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact.  They establish a good rapport with the patient which is respectful of any  ethnic, religious or social preferences that they express. They are empathic  and sensitive to the patient’s concerns.
 
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' neither introduce themselves nor identify the patient.  They hurry the patient and ignore what the  patient is saying.  They look away or  appear impatient during the history taking.  There are unable to establish rapport with the patient and show  little respect.
 
|-
 
 
|
 
|
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
 
|-
 
|-
|Introduction and start of interview
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 9,531: Line 9,995:
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
|-
 
|Rapport with patient and development of trust
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Listening skills, appropriate eye contact and non-verbal  communication
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Empathy and sensitivity
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Respect for patient
 
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 9,560: Line 10,001:
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
|}
 +
 +
===== Coecsa-ocex =====
 +
'''COECSA Ophthalmic Clinical Evaluation Exercise (COECSA-OCEX)'''
 +
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="6" |'''Information gathering'''
+
|
|-
+
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' capture all of the appropriate information  required for the ophthalmic examination and diagnosis, the planning of  investigations and subsequent management. Their questions are structured and  guided by the differential diagnosis suggested by the presenting complaint.
 
  
'''Poor trainees''' ask questions by rote.  They omit important areas.  They  do not pursue an appropriate line of questioning informed by a differential  diagnosis.
+
The OCEX is an observed encounter between a    resident and a new patient. The evaluator should be present in the exam    room for the entire interaction. The intent is to rate the resident in all    the categories listed below compared to a graduating resident and    then provide immediate performance feedback. The rating system is:
 +
 
 +
    1    -  Does Not Meet Expectations     2 – Meets Some Expectations       3 - Meets All Expectations
 +
 
 +
                     4 – Exceeds Expectations                   na -  Not Applicable
 +
|}
 +
<span lang="FR">Elicits medical & environmental allergies/symptoms</span>
 +
<span lang="FR">Elicits medical & environmental allergies/symptoms</span>
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="13" |'''Interview  Skills'''
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|'''1. Introduced self'''
|'''Poor'''
+
|'''1'''
|'''Fair'''
+
|'''2'''
|'''Good'''
+
|'''3'''
|'''V Good'''
+
|'''4'''
|'''n/a'''
+
|'''na'''
 +
| rowspan="6" |
 +
|'''7. Review of systems'''
 +
|'''1'''
 +
|'''2'''
 +
|'''3'''
 +
|'''4'''
 +
|'''na'''
 
|-
 
|-
|History of presenting complaint
+
|'''2.  Obtained chief complaint'''
|
+
|'''1'''
|
+
|'''2'''
|
+
|'''3'''
|
+
|'''4'''
|
+
|'''na'''
 +
|'''8. Med list'''
 +
|'''1'''
 +
|'''2'''
 +
|'''3'''
 +
|'''4'''
 +
|'''na'''
 
|-
 
|-
|Past ophthalmic history
+
|'''3.  History of present illness'''
|
+
|'''1'''
|
+
|'''2'''
|
+
|'''3'''
|
+
|'''4'''
|
+
|'''na'''
 +
|'''9. Past medical history'''
 +
|'''1'''
 +
|'''2'''
 +
|'''3'''
 +
|'''4'''
 +
|'''na'''
 
|-
 
|-
|Family history
+
|'''4.  Pertinent negatives'''
|
+
|'''1'''
|
+
|'''2'''
|
+
|'''3'''
|
+
|'''4'''
|
+
|'''na'''
 +
|'''10. Social history'''
 +
|'''1'''
 +
|'''2'''
 +
|'''3'''
 +
|'''4'''
 +
|'''na'''
 
|-
 
|-
|Past medical history/general health
+
|'''5. Pain inquiry'''
|
+
|'''1'''
|
+
|'''2'''
|
+
|'''3'''
|
+
|'''4'''
|
+
|'''na'''
 +
|'''11. Family history'''
 +
|'''1'''
 +
|'''2'''
 +
|'''3'''
 +
|'''4'''
 +
|'''Na'''
 
|-
 
|-
|Systems enquiry
+
|'''6.  Allergies'''
|
+
|'''1'''
|
+
|'''2'''
|
+
|'''3'''
|
+
|'''4'''
|
+
|'''na'''
 +
|'''12. Washed hands'''
 +
|'''1'''
 +
|'''2'''
 +
|'''3'''
 +
|'''4'''
 +
|'''Na'''
 
|-
 
|-
|Drug history and allergies
+
| colspan="13" |'''Examination'''
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
|Social history
+
|'''1. Best  corrected Va'''
|
+
|'''1'''
|
+
|'''2'''
|
+
|'''3'''
|
+
|'''4'''
|
+
|'''na'''
 +
| rowspan="4" |
 +
|'''5. External'''
 +
|'''1'''
 +
|'''2'''
 +
|'''3'''
 +
|'''4'''
 +
|'''na'''
 
|-
 
|-
|Other relevant enquiries pertinent to case
+
|'''2.  Pupils / RAPD'''
|
+
|'''1'''
|
+
|'''2'''
|
+
|'''3'''
|
+
|'''4'''
|
+
|'''na'''
 +
|'''6. SLE'''
 +
|'''1'''
 +
|'''2'''
 +
|'''3'''
 +
|'''4'''
 +
|'''na'''
 
|-
 
|-
|Assessment of mental state
+
|'''3.  Visual Fields'''
|
+
|'''1'''
|
+
|'''2'''
|
+
|'''3'''
|
+
|'''4'''
|
+
|'''na'''
|}
+
|'''7. IOP (+/- gonioscopy)'''
{| class="wikitable"
+
|'''1'''
| colspan="6" |'''Awareness'''
+
|'''2'''
 +
|'''3'''
 +
|'''4'''
 +
|'''na'''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' are attentive the patient’s anxiety and  main concerns.  They are sensitive to  the social impact of the patient’s problems.  They adapt the interview appropriately as determined by the patient’s  age, mental state and any communication problems such as poor hearing or  language barriers.
+
|'''4.  Motility'''
 
+
|'''1'''
'''Poor trainees''' disregard the patient’s main concerns or anxieties and any  impact their problem may have on their social circumstances. They are  insensitive to the potential barriers to good communication raised by  extremes of age, mental state, hearing impairment or language.
+
|'''2'''
|-
+
|'''3'''
|
+
|'''4'''
|'''Poor'''
+
|'''na'''
|'''Fair'''
+
|'''8. Funduscopy'''
|'''Good'''
+
|'''1'''
|'''V Good'''
+
|'''2'''
|'''n/a'''
+
|'''3'''
 +
|'''4'''
 +
|'''na'''
 
|-
 
|-
|Sensitive and responsive to patient anxieties and concerns
+
| colspan="13" |'''Interpersonal Skills / Professionalism'''
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
|Aware of the social impact of problems for patient
+
|'''1.  Empathetic'''
|
+
|'''1'''
|
+
|'''2'''
|
+
|'''3'''
|
+
|'''4'''
|
+
|'''na'''
 +
| rowspan="3" |
 +
|'''5. Explained diagnosis'''
 +
|'''1'''
 +
|'''2'''
 +
|'''3'''
 +
|'''4'''
 +
|'''na'''
 
|-
 
|-
|Interview sensitive and responsive to age of patient, mental  state and any communication problems
+
|'''2. Respectful & courteous'''
|
+
|'''1'''
|
+
|'''2'''
|
+
|'''3'''
|
+
|'''4'''
|
+
|'''na'''
|}
+
|'''6. Explained plan/options'''
 
+
|'''1'''
 
+
|'''2'''
{| class="wikitable"
+
|'''3'''
| colspan="6" |'''Management of interview'''
+
|'''4'''
 +
|'''na'''
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' are skilled in questioning with an  appropriate mixture of open and closed questions.  They clarify what they have understood and  check this with the patient by appropriate summaries. They use the time  efficiently and guide the patient with sensitivity. They explain terms  appropriately and finish the interview effectively, making future plans  clear.
+
|'''3. Used language the pt'''
  
'''Poor trainees''' ask closed questions which do not encourage the patient to tell  her/his story. They do not clarify points or attempt to summarise.  They waste time through repetition or  inappropriate questioning. They do not guide the patient appropriately.  Information if provided at all unclear or  too technical.  They do not make it  clear when the interview has come to an end or what the next step is.
+
'''Understands'''
 +
|'''1'''
 +
|'''2'''
 +
|'''3'''
 +
|'''4'''
 +
|'''na'''
 +
|'''7. Asked if patient had'''
 +
 
 +
'''questions'''
 +
|'''1'''
 +
|'''2'''
 +
|'''3'''
 +
|'''4'''
 +
|'''na'''
 
|-
 
|-
|
+
|'''4. Explained findings'''
|'''Poor'''
+
|'''1'''
|'''Fair'''
+
|'''2'''
|'''Good'''
+
|'''3'''
|'''V Good'''
+
|'''4'''
|'''n/a'''
+
|'''na'''
 +
| colspan="7" |
 
|-
 
|-
|Mode of enquiry: appropriate use of closed, open, directed and  probing questions.  Clarification and  summarising.
+
| colspan="13" |'''Case Presentation'''
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
|Appropriate control and direction
+
|'''1.  Concise & clear'''
|
+
|'''1'''
|
+
|'''2'''
|
+
|'''3'''
|
+
|'''4'''
|
+
|'''na'''
 +
| rowspan="3" |
 +
|'''4. Appropriate differential Dx'''
 +
|'''1'''
 +
|'''2'''
 +
|'''3'''
 +
|'''4'''
 +
|'''na'''
 
|-
 
|-
|Efficient use of time
+
|'''2. Pertinent facts'''
|
+
|'''1'''
|
+
|'''2'''
|
+
|'''3'''
|
+
|'''4'''
|
+
|'''na'''
|-
+
|'''5. Appropriate plan'''
|Delivery of information
+
|'''1'''
|
+
|'''2'''
|
+
|'''3'''
|
+
|'''4'''
|
+
|'''na'''
|
 
 
|-
 
|-
|Termination of interview
+
|'''3. Pertinent pos & negs'''
|
+
|'''1'''
|
+
|'''2'''
|
+
|'''3'''
|
+
|'''4'''
|
+
|'''na'''
 +
|'''6. Response to attending’s'''
 +
 
 +
'''questions/suggestions'''
 +
|'''1'''
 +
|'''2'''
 +
|'''3'''
 +
|'''4'''
 +
|'''na'''
 
|}
 
|}
{| class="wikitable"
+
Comments:                                                                                                                                                                      
|'''Overall performance in this  assessment'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V  Good'''
 
|-
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
'''Summative Outcome ('''Delete as appropriate if tool used for summative assessments)'''                             Pass/Fail'''
 
''Pass/Fail = Meets expectation /Does not meet expectation for stage of training''
 
''' '''
 
  
''(Note: "Pass" requires an overall assessment grade of "Good" and '''NO''' individual "Poor" grades.)''
+
                                                                                                                                                                                       
 
 
''' '''
 
  
 +
                                                                                                                                                                               
  
'''Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.'''
 
  
              
+
We have reviewed this OCEX together.                 Resident initials:                        Date:            
{| class="wikitable"
 
|
 
 
 
 
 
Anything especially good?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
|
 
 
 
 
 
Suggestions for development:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
|-
 
| colspan="2" |
 
 
 
 
 
Agreed action:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
|}
 
              
 
 
 
 
 
'''Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee:'''
 
 
 
 
 
5.2.1.2 Clinical Rating Scale CRS2 (Outcome CA2: ASSESS Vision)
 
 
 
 
 
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 
 
 
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRS2 (Outcome CA2: Assess Vision)'''
 
 
 
All trainees must be able to assess visual acuity for near and distance using an appropriate method and interpret the results. They must be aware of and be able to interpret and apply newer methods of assessing visual acuity when they are introduced into clinical practice. They must be able to test colour vision using an appropriate method and interpret the results. They should also know the principles of the assessment of contrast sensitivity. They must be able to assess vision in children and in adults who have language and other barriers to communication. They must be able to assess vision in circumstances outside the OPD environment.
 
 
 
 
 
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                                Date (dd/mm/yyyy)                     
 
 
 
YEAR 1                                YEAR 2                   YEAR 3            YEAR 4             Other (specify)
 
 
 
Assessor's name                                                                                             Type of assessment:  Formative           Summative                                                                
 
 
 
Assessor's status           Consultant                       Senior Trainee                    Other (Specify)
 
 
 
Brief description of case                                       
 
 
 
 
 
'''Please grade the following areas using the scale below''' (use tick or cross)
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Attitude and manner'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' introduce themselves and establish the name  of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer). Their  demeanour throughout shows that they are attentive to the patient by  gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They explain  the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out.
 
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' neither introduce themselves nor identify  the patient.  They hurry the patient  and ignore what the patient is saying.  They do not explain the test in an appropriate manner.
 
|-
 
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Introduction and explanation of test
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Rapport with patient, empathy and  sensitivity to age and context
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Respect for patient
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Visual acuity Method*: Snellen/LogMar/Sheridan-Gardner/other,  specify'''
 
 
 
(* Please circle method as appropriate or specify  “other”…………………………………………….)
 
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''Very good trainees''' occlude each eye in turn to perform  the test.  They use an appropriate form  of visual acuity assessment determined by the patient’s age and level of  understanding.  They can compare  results from different tests.  They use  appropriate refractive correction and instruct the patient on the best use of  a pinhole. They record the visual acuity correctly.
 
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' do not occlude appropriately.  They do not use an appropriate test  method.  They do not understand the  equivalence of results from different tests.  They do not use an appropriate method of correcting refractive error.  The visual acuity is recorded inaccurately or incorrectly.
 
|-
 
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Appropriate occlusion
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Technique of assessment appropriate for age and context
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Appropriate use of refractive correction
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Appropriate use of pinhole
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Accurate recording of distance acuity
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Accurate recording of near acuity
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 
 
 
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRS2 (Outcome CA2: Assess Vision)'''
 
 
 
All trainees must be able to assess visual acuity for near and distance using an appropriate method and interpret the results. They must be aware of and be able to interpret and apply newer methods of assessing visual acuity when they are introduced into clinical practice. They must be able to test colour vision using an appropriate method and interpret the results. They should also know the principles of the assessment of contrast sensitivity. They must be able to assess vision in children and in adults who have language and other barriers to communication. They must be able to assess vision in circumstances outside the OPD environment.
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Colour vision (Method: Ishihara/other  pseudoisochromatic/other)'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' occlude each eye in turn to perform the  test.  They use an appropriate form of  colour vision assessment determined by the patient’s age and level of  understanding.  They can compare  results from different tests. They record the results of the colour vision  test correctly and know how to interpret them.
 
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' do not occlude appropriately.  They do not choose an appropriate test  method.  They do not understand the equivalence of results from different tests.  The colour vision is recorded inaccurately  or incorrectly.  They do not understand  the implications of the result.
 
|-
 
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Appropriate occlusion
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Technique of assessment appropriate for age and context
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Appropriate use of colour vision test
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Accurate recording of colour vision
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|'''Overall performance in this assessment'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V  Good'''
 
|-
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
'''Summative Outcome ('''Delete as appropriate if tool used for summative assessments)'''                             Pass/Fail'''
 
 
 
''' '''
 
 
 
''(Note: "Pass" requires an overall assessment grade of "Good" and '''NO''' individual "Poor" grades.)''
 
 
 
''' '''
 
 
 
 
 
'''Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.'''
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|
 
 
 
 
 
Anything especially good?
 
|
 
 
 
 
 
Suggestions for development:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
|-
 
| colspan="2" |Agreed action:
 
 
 
 
 
|}
 
              
 
 
 
'''Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee:'''
 
 
 
 
 
5.2.1.3 Clinical Rating Scale CRS3 (Outcome CA3: EXTERNAL EYE EXAMINATION)
 
 
 
 
 
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 
 
 
'''Clinical Rating Scale CR3 (Outcome CA3''': '''External Eye Examination)'''
 
 
 
All trainees must be able to perform an examination of the external eye, ocular adnexae, eyelids and orbits using appropriate equipment and illumination. They must be able to modify the examination and utilise other techniques as indicated by the clinical findings.
 
 
 
 
 
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                 Date (dd/mm/yyyy)       
 
 
 
YEAR 1                                YEAR 2                   YEAR 3            YEAR 4             Other (specify)
 
 
 
Assessor's name                                                                                         Type of assessment: Formative         Summative                                                              
 
 
 
Assessor's status           Consultant                       Senior Trainee                   Other (Specify)
 
 
 
Brief description of case                                       
 
 
 
 
 
'''Please grade the following areas using the scale below''' (use tick or cross)
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Attitude and manner'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' introduce themselves and establish the name  of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer). Their  demeanour throughout shows that they are attentive to the patient by  gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They clearly  explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out.
 
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' fail to introduce themselves and do not  identify the patient.  They appear to  hurry or ignore what the patient is saying.  They do not explain the test in an appropriate manner.
 
|-
 
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V  Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Introduction and explanation of  examination
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Rapport with patient, empathy and  sensitivity to age and context
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Respect for patient
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''External eye examination'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' carry out a thorough inspection of the patient and this  efficiently guides the examination.  They examine the patient’s face, lymph nodes and neck and observe,  palpate and auscultate the orbit as indicated.  They examine the lacrimal gland, sac,  canaliculi and puncta. They examine static and dynamic lid position and make  accurate and surgically relevant measurements (e.g. Bells, corneal  sensation).  They identify any  abnormalities of the lashes and meibomian glands. They examine the bulbar,  tarsal and forniceal conjunctiva and the cornea, in particular identifying  abnormalities thereof secondary to lid abnormalities.
 
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' examine the external eye in an ill-structured and inefficient  way and without adequate illumination.  They restrict their examination to the eyelids, even when the clinical  condition suggests an examination of wider facial or ocular structures. They  are unable to assess lid position accurately.  They fail to examine all of the conjunctiva and the lacrimal system,  or the cornea. They do not assess the orbital margin.  They fail to recognise important  abnormalities of the external eye.
 
|-
 
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V  Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Assessment of face/head
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Palpation of orbital margins
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Examination of lacrimal system
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Assessment of lid position with  appropriate measurements
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Examination of lashes
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Examination of meibomian glands
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Examination of conjunctiva
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Examination of cornea
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 
 
 
'''Clinical Rating Scale CR3 (Outcome CA3''': '''External Eye Examination)'''
 
 
 
All trainees must be able to perform an examination of the external eye, ocular adnexae, eyelids and orbits using appropriate equipment and illumination. They must be able to modify the examination and utilise other techniques as indicated by the clinical findings.
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Use of ancillary tests'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' use these techniques skilfully and without prompting.  They recognise the limits of normality and  correctly interpret their findings.
 
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' require prompting to use these techniques.  They have a poor method and fail to  recognise normal and abnormal findings.
 
|-
 
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V  Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Lid eversion
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Exophthalmometer
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Other (please specify)
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|'''Overall performance in this  assessment'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V  Good'''
 
|-
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
''' '''
 
 
 
'''Summative Outcome ('''Delete as appropriate if tool used for summative assessments)'''                             Pass/Fail'''
 
 
 
''' '''
 
 
 
''(Note: "Pass" requires an overall assessment grade of "Good" and '''NO''' individual "Poor" grades.)''
 
 
 
 
 
'''Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.'''
 
 
 
              
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|
 
 
 
 
 
Anything especially good?
 
|
 
 
 
 
 
Suggestions for development:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
|-
 
| colspan="2" |
 
 
 
 
 
Agreed action:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
|}
 
              
 
 
 
 
 
'''Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee:''' 5.2.1.4 Clinical Rating Scale CR4 (Outcome CA4: EXAMINATION OF PUPILS) 
 
 
 
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 
 
 
'''Clinical Rating Scale CR4 (Outcome CA4''': '''Examination of Pupils)'''
 
 
 
All trainees must be able to assess the pupil for abnormalities of shape, size and reactions and interpret their findings.  They must also be able to perform and interpret appropriate pharmacological tests for specific pupil abnormalities.
 
 
 
                                              
 
 
 
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                          Date (dd/mm/yyyy)                 
 
 
 
YEAR 1                                YEAR 2                   YEAR 3            YEAR 4             Other (specify)
 
 
 
Assessor's name                                                                                         Type of assessment: Formative          Summative                                                              
 
 
 
Assessor's status           Consultant                       Senior Trainee                    Other (Specify)
 
 
 
Brief description of case:
 
 
 
 
 
'''Please grade the following areas using the scale below''' (use tick or cross)
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Attitude and manner'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' introduce themselves and establish the name  of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer). Their  demeanour throughout shows that they are attentive to the patient by  gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They clearly  explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out.
 
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' fail to introduce themselves and do not  identify the patient.  They appear to  hurry or ignore what the patient is saying.  They do not explain the test in an appropriate manner.
 
|-
 
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V  Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Introduction and explanation of  examination
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Rapport with patient, empathy and  sensitivity to age and context
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Respect for patient
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Examination of the pupils'''
 
 
 
'''V good trainees''' examine the patient in low ambient light and record the pupil  size, position, shape and symmetry.  They ensure that the subject fixates on a distance target.  They use a bright focussed light to examine  the direct and the consensual reaction in each eye, noting the extent, speed  and recovery of the reaction.  They  then progress to the swinging flashlight test (SFT), dwelling on each eye for  a second or two and moving the  light swiftly across to the other pupil.  They  correctly interpret the results of a SFT even when one pupil is dilated or  obscured.  They test the accommodative  reaction using an appropriate target and instruction.  They ask to view the pupils on the slit  lamp.  They are familiar with  pharmacological tests for abnormal pupil reactions. They suggest an  appropriate cause for any abnormalities observed. 
 
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' examine the pupils in an ill-structured and inefficient way  with inappropriate illumination.  They  fail to ensure that the subject fixates on a distance target and get in the  way of the subject’s direction of gaze.  They allow the test light to spill into the non-tested eye.  They forget to record the size, shape and  position of the pupils.  They perform  the SFT with a slow arc under the nose from one eye to the other.  They are unable to comment on pupil  reactions if one pupil is dilated or obscured.  They elicit the accommodative reaction by  rapidly approaching the eyes with one finger and are unaware of the threat  response.  They exhibit confusion about  the theory and practice of pharmacological tests. They forget to view the  pupils on the slit lamp. They are unable to interpret the results of the  test.
 
|-
 
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V  Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|General inspection in ambient light  with measurements
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Appropriate use of distance target
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Direct pupillary reaction and  recovery
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Consensual reaction and recovery
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Swinging flashlight test
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Accommodative reaction and recovery
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Slit lamp examination
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Correct reactions identified
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Suggestion of suitable aetiology
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Suggestions for suitable further  tests
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 
 
 
'''Clinical Rating Scale CR4 (Outcome CA4''': '''Examination of Pupils)'''
 
 
 
All trainees must be able to assess the pupil for abnormalities of shape, size and reactions and interpret their findings.  They must also be able to perform and interpret appropriate pharmacological tests for specific pupil abnormalities
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|'''Overall performance in this  assessment'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V  Good'''
 
|-
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
'''Summative Outcome ('''Delete as appropriate if tool used for summative assessments)'''                             Pass/Fail'''
 
 
 
''' '''
 
 
 
''(Note: "Pass" requires an overall assessment grade of "Good" and '''NO''' individual "Poor" grades.)''
 
 
 
''' '''
 
 
 
 
 
'''Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.'''
 
 
 
              
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|
 
 
 
 
 
Anything especially good?
 
|
 
 
 
 
 
Suggestions for development:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
|-
 
| colspan="2" |
 
 
 
 
 
Agreed action:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
|}
 
              
 
 
 
 
 
'''Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee:'''
 
 
 
 
 
           5.2.1.5 Clinical Rating Scale CRS5 (Outcome CA5: OculaR MOTILITY)
 
 
 
                                              
 
 
 
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 
 
 
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRS5 (Outcome CA5''': '''Cover Test and Ocular Motility)'''
 
 
 
All trainees must be able to perform a cover test, assess ocular movements and interpret the findings. They must be able perform a prism cover test.  They must also be able to recognise and describe nystagmus if present.
 
 
 
 
 
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                               Date (dd/mm/yyyy)                 
 
 
 
YEAR 1                                YEAR 2                   YEAR 3            YEAR 4             Other (specify)
 
 
 
Assessor's name                                                                                         Type of assessment:  Formative        Summative                                                              
 
 
 
Assessor's status           Consultant                       Senior Trainee                     Other (Specify)
 
 
 
Brief description of case                                       
 
 
 
 
 
'''Please grade the following areas using the scale below''' (use tick or cross)
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Attitude and manner'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' introduce themselves and establish the name  of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer). Their  demeanour throughout shows that they are attentive to the patient by  gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They clearly  explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out.
 
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' fail to introduce themselves and do not  identify the patient.  They appear to  hurry or ignore what the patient is saying.  They do not explain the test in an appropriate manner.
 
|-
 
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V  Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Introduction and explanation of  examination
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Rapport with patient, empathy and  sensitivity to age and context
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Respect for patient
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Cover test and eye movements'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' comment on corneal reflexes and any abnormal head posture,  ptosis, pupils etc. They use suitable near and distance fixation targets.  They perform cover-uncover and alternate cover tests purposefully without  excessive repetition and identify abnormalities accurately. Their  instructions to the patient are clear and unambiguous throughout. The  examination flows easily and appropriate versions, ductions, vergences and  saccade checks are performed in response to findings.
 
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' fail to perform a general inspection of the patient. Their  instructions to the patient are ambiguous and confusing so that the patient  is unclear what is expected of them. They perform the tests clumsily, without  an obvious plan and important steps are missed. They miss and/or fail to  interpret important clinical signs.
 
|-
 
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V  Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Observation of associated ocular  signs and head position
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Use of fixation targets
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Performance of cover, cover-uncover  test and alternate cover test.
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Assessment of versions, ductions,  vergences, saccades
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Interpretation of findings
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
 
 
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 
 
 
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRS5 (Outcome CA5''': '''Cover Test and Ocular Motility)'''
 
 
 
All trainees must be able to perform a cover test, assess ocular movements and interpret the findings. They must be able perform a prism cover test.  They must also be able to recognise and describe nystagmus if present.
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Prism cover test'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' give clear instructions to the patient. They perform the test  at near and distance and with/without glasses or head posture if appropriate.  They hold the prism bar at a comfortable and effective distance with prisms  aligned in the correct position for the deviation. They perform an alternate  cover test with increasing prism strength until the deviation is reversed.  They interpret the test accurately.
 
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' leave the patient unclear what is expected of them. They are  unfamiliar with the prism bar. They miss important steps and they fail to  assess the angle with acceptable accuracy.
 
|-
 
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V  Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Explanation of test
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Appropriate positioning of  prism bar
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Assessment of angle
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Interpretation of results
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|'''Overall performance in this  assessment'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V  Good'''
 
|-
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
'''Summative Outcome ('''Delete as appropriate if tool used for summative assessments)'''                             Pass/Fail'''
 
 
 
''' '''
 
 
 
''(Note: "Pass" requires an overall assessment grade of "Good" and '''NO''' individual "Poor" grades.)''
 
 
 
''' '''
 
 
 
 
 
'''Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.'''
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|              
 
 
 
Anything especially good?
 
|
 
 
 
 
 
Suggestions for development:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
|-
 
| colspan="2" |
 
 
 
 
 
Agreed action:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
|}
 
              
 
 
 
'''Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee:''' 
 
 
 
5.2.1.6 Clinical Rating Scale CRS6 (Outcome CA6: IOP MeASUREMENT)
 
 
 
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 
 
 
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRS6 (CA6''': '''IOP Measurement)'''
 
 
 
All trainees must be able to measure the intraocular pressure accurately using a variety of applanation techniques and understand the limits of each.  They must be able to check the calibration of the tonometer.
 
 
 
 
 
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                                                         Date (dd/mm/yyyy)          
 
 
 
YEAR1                                        YEAR 2                            YEAR 3                                    YEAR 4                                   Other (specify)
 
 
 
Assessor's name:
 
 
 
 
 
Assessor's status:         Consultant                                               AHP                           Other (Specify)
 
 
 
 
 
Brief description of case(s)                                  
 
 
 
'''Please grade the following areas using the scale below''' (use tick or cross)
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Attitude and manner'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' introduce themselves and  establish the identity of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse,  parent, carer). Their demeanour throughout shows that they are attentive to  the patient by gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact.  They clearly explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out.  They ensure that the patient is comfortable  and that adequate privacy is maintained.
 
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' fail to introduce  themselves and do not identify the patient.  They appear to hurry or ignore what the patient is saying.  They do not explain the test in an  appropriate manner.  They pay little or  no attention to confirmation of patient comfort or privacy.
 
|-
 
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Introduction and explanation  of examination
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Rapport with patient,  empathy and sensitivity to age and context
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Respect for patient and  their comfort
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''IOP  measurement (Technique: Goldmann/Tonopen/Perkins/other)'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' ensure adequate disinfection of the tonometer before and after use.  They insert appropriate amounts of appropriate drops, avoid contact of the  tonometer with lids or lashes and complete the measurement swiftly without  prolonged contact between tonometer and cornea. They achieve a reading  accurate to within 2 mm Hg of the assessor’s reading. They are conversant  with all types of IOP measurement methods and the advantages and  disadvantages of each.
 
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' have to be prompted to ensure disinfection of the tonometer tip  before and after use.  They insert  inappropriate quantities of anaesthetic drops or use inappropriate  drops.  They push roughly on the patient’s  eye and lids and touch the tonometer on the lids.  They have difficulty achieving a reading,  requiring several attempts, and fail to achieve accuracy to within 2 mm  Hg.  They frequently cause trauma to  the corneal epithelium. They are not fully aware of all types of measurement  methods or their advantages and disadvantages.
 
|-
 
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Consent for test
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Application of  anaesthesia and fluorescein
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Stabilisation of lids and  eye
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Use of tonometer.  Accurate placement on eye
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Accurate IOP  recording.  Accurate to within 2mm Hg
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Interpretation of result
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Corneal appearance after  examination
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Care of tonometer head
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Infection control
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Checking  calibration of tonometer'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' know how to use the calibration arm and what to do if the reading is  inaccurate.
 
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' do not know what to do with the calibration arm and do not know what  an inaccurate reading is, or what to do about it.
 
|-
 
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Knowledge of reasons for calibration
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Appropriate use of calibration arm
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Interpretation of results
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Appropriate action taken
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|'''Overall performance in this assessment'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
|-
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
'''Outcome''' (Delete as appropriate) '''                             Pass/Fail'''
 
 
 
'''''NB The following boxes MUST be completed:'''''
 
 
 
              
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|
 
 
 
 
 
Please note any aspects which were especially  good:
 
|-
 
|Please note any  suggestions for improvement and action points:
 
|}
 
              
 
 
 
 
 
'''Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee:''' 
 
 
 
5.2.1.7 Clinical Rating scale CRS7 (CA7: Use of Slit Lamp)
 
 
 
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 
 
 
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRS7 (CA7: Use of Slit Lamp)'''
 
 
 
All trainees must be able to examine the eye and adjacent structures using the slit lamp and interpret their findings. They must be able to employ all of the functions of the slit lamp and use accessory equipment when indicated. They must know how to care for the equipment properly and prevent cross infection.
 
 
 
                                                                                              
 
 
 
Trainee’s Nam                                                                                                                                                        Date (dd/mm/yyyy)              
 
 
 
YEAR 1                                YEAR 2                   YEAR 3            YEAR 4             Other (specify)
 
 
 
Assessor's name                                                                                          Type of assessment:  Formative          Summative                                                                
 
 
 
Assessor's status           Consultant                       Senior Trainee                    Other (Specify)
 
 
 
Brief description of case                                       
 
 
 
                                              
 
 
 
 
 
'''Please grade the following areas using the scale below''' (use tick or cross)
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Attitude and manner'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' introduce themselves and establish the name  of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer). Their  demeanour throughout shows that they are attentive to the patient by  gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They clearly  explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out.
 
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' fail to introduce themselves and do not  identify the patient.  They appear to  hurry or ignore what the patient is saying.  They do not explain the test in an appropriate manner.
 
|-
 
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Introduction and explanation of  examination
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Rapport with patient, empathy and  sensitivity to age and context
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Respect for patient
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Knowledge of slit lamp'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' set up the slit lamp properly in advance of  conducting the examination. They appropriately set the IPD and focus of each  eyepiece, and have a good knowledge of all the slit lamp functions and  techniques of illumination to achieve the optimum view of the part of the eye  being examined. They know what adjustments to make to view different areas of  the anterior and posterior segment. They are aware of appropriate care and  maintenance of the slit lamp.
 
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' fail to set up the slit lamp properly. Their  examination technique is slip shod and halting and they make constant aimless  readjustments. They appear unaware of the best slit lamp settings to optimise  the examination of different parts of the anterior and posterior  segments. 
 
|-
 
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Appropriate IPD
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Appropriate eyepiece focus
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Appropriate selection of slit beam  size and angle
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Use of full range of available  magnification powers
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Use of appropriate filters
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
 
 
'''Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee:'''
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.2.1.8 Clinical Rating scale CRS8 (CA8: Fundus Examination – Direct opthalmoscope)
 
 
 
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 
 
 
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRS8 (CA8: Fundus Examination)'''
 
 
 
All trainees must be able to examine the fundus of the eye using appropriate techniques and interpret their findings. They must be able to use the direct and indirect ophthalmoscopes. They must be able to use a variety of lenses for binocular fundus examination with the slit lamp. They must be able to use appropriate indentation techniques.
 
 
 
                              
 
 
 
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                Date (dd/mm/yyyy)                
 
 
 
YEAR 1                                YEAR 2                   YEAR 3            YEAR 4             Other (specify)
 
 
 
Assessor's name                                                                                           Type of assessment:  Formative         Summative                                                              
 
 
 
Assessor's status           Consultant                       Senior Trainee                  Other (Specify)
 
 
 
Brief description of case                                       
 
 
 
 
 
'''Please grade the following areas using the scale below''' (use tick or cross)
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Attitude and manner'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' introduce themselves and establish the name  of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer). Their  demeanour throughout shows that they are attentive to the patient by  gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They clearly  explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out.
 
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' fail to introduce themselves and do not identify the  patient.  They appear to hurry or  ignore what the patient is saying.  They do not explain the test in an appropriate manner.
 
|-
 
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V  Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Introduction and explanation of  examination
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Rapport with patient, empathy and  sensitivity to age and context
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Respect for patient
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Aware of patient’s comfort
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Direct ophthalmoscope'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' check the ophthalmoscope before using it. They select the most  appropriate colour, shape, size and brightness of light beam at every stage.  They always choose the most appropriate correcting lens. They explain the  procedure and show that they understand the discomfort caused by the  brightness of the light. They readily achieve a good view of the central  fundus and achieve a view as far peripherally as is feasible. Their technique  is efficient and fluent. They will describe their findings accurately.
 
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' launch into the examination without checking the instrument  settings. They show no understanding of the uses of the different settings.  Their use of the lenses is haphazard. They are unable to co-ordinate an  examination of the peripheral fundus. They fail to understand and empathise  with the patient when the patient finds the light uncomfortable. They miss  abnormalities altogether and/or fail to describe them.
 
|-
 
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V  Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Instructions to patient
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Familiarity with use of  ophthalmoscope
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Correct use of illumination
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Appropriate use of lenses
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Description of findings
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|} 
 
 
 
5.2.1.9 Clinical Rating scale CRS8 (CA8: Fundus Examination – indirect ophthalmoscope)
 
 
 
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 
 
 
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRS8 (CA8: Fundus Examination)'''
 
 
 
All trainees must be able to examine the fundus of the eye using appropriate techniques and interpret their findings. They must be able to use the direct and indirect ophthalmoscopes. They must be able to use a variety of lenses for binocular fundus examination with the slit lamp. They must be able to use appropriate indentation techniques.
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Indirect ophthalmoscope'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' adjust the equipment appropriately before use, in particular  adjusting the light for optimum viewing. They examine the patient in a  reclined position whenever appropriate and ensure their comfort. They choose  the most appropriate condensing lens and demonstrate an efficient and fluent  technique, holding the lens at the best distance from the eye. When  appropriate they use indentation efficiently and gently. They use the minimum  light necessary for a proper view and empathise with the patient when the  light or the indentation causes discomfort. They describe their findings  accurately.
 
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' struggle to place the ophthalmoscope in position on their head  squarely and securely. They are unable to adjust the light appropriately.  They fail to ensure that the patient is comfortable or appropriately  positioned. They use too much or too little illumination. Their use and  positioning of the lens is haphazard. They are unable to co-ordinate an  examination of the peripheral fundus and are rough with and/or unsuccessful  at indentation. They fail to understand and empathise with the patient when  the patient finds the test uncomfortable. If they manage to achieve a view at  all they miss abnormalities altogether and/or fail to describe them.
 
|-
 
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V  Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Instructions to patient
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Familiarity with use of  ophthalmoscope
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Correct use of illumination
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Appropriate use of lenses
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Indentation technique
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Description of findings
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|} 
 
 
 
5.2.1.10 Clinical Rating scale CRS8 (CA8: Fundus Examination – 78d/90d lens)
 
 
 
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 
 
 
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRS8 (CA8: Fundus Examination)'''
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="7" |'''78D/90D lens'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="7" |'''Very good trainees''' set up the slit lamp illumination and eyepieces before commencing the  examination. They help the patient to get into position if necessary. They  warn of the brightness of the light. They select the most appropriate lens  and show expertise in holding it in the correct position and orientation.  They choose the most appropriate colour, size and brightness of light at  every stage and empathise with the patient who has difficulty looking in the  correct direction. Thel have a fluent technique and achieve as good a view of  both central and peripheral retina as is possible. They describe their  findings accurately.
 
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' rush into the examination without setting the slit lamp properly.  They start with an inappropriately bright light but have to fiddle around to  get it pointing correctly. They show frustration when the patient cannot  place his/her head appropriately or cannot move the eye into the desired  position. They choose an inappropriate lens and/or show difficulty in getting  it positioned correctly. If they manage to achieve a view at all they miss  abnormalities altogether and/or fail to describe them.
 
|-
 
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
| colspan="2" |'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Instructions to patient
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Familiarity with use of lenses
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Correct use of slit lamp illumination
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|-
 
|Appropriate use of lenses
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|-
 
|Description of findings
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
| colspan="2" |
 
|
 
|-
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
5.2.1.11 Clinical Rating scale CRS8 (CA8: Fundus Examination – Fundus contact lens)
 
 
 
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 
 
 
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRS8 (CA8: Fundus Examination)'''
 
 
 
All trainees must be able to examine the fundus of the eye using appropriate techniques and interpret their findings. They must be able to use the direct and indirect ophthalmoscopes. They must be able to use a variety of lenses for binocular fundus examination with the slit lamp. They must be able to use appropriate indentation techniques.
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Fundus contact lenses'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' set up the slit lamp illumination and eyepieces before  commencing the examination. They help the patient to get into position if  necessary. They warn the patient of the brightness of the light. They ensure  that the patient's ocular surface is adequately anaesthetised. They choose  the most appropriate lens and ensure that it is disinfected and clean. They  choose the most appropriate colour, size and brightness of light at every  stage and empathise with the patient who has difficulty keeping the eye  still. Their technique is fluent and they are able to view all structures  required. They describe their findings accurately.
 
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' rush into the examination without setting the slit lamp  properly. They start with an inappropriately bright light but have to fiddle  around to get it pointing correctly. They show frustration when patients  cannot place their head appropriately, cannot hold their eye still or have  difficulty tolerating the contact lens. They choose an inappropriate lens,  show no regard to disinfection procedures and have difficulty getting the  lens positioned correctly. If they manage to achieve a view at all they miss  abnormalities altogether and/or fail to describe them.
 
|-
 
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V  Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Instructions to and preparation of  patient
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Familiarity with use of lenses
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Correct use of slit lamp  illumination
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Appropriate use of lenses
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Description of findings
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|'''Overall performance in this  assessment'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V  Good'''
 
|-
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
'''Summative Outcome ('''Delete as appropriate if tool used for summative assessments)'''                             Pass/Fail'''
 
 
 
''' '''
 
 
 
''(Note: "Pass" requires an overall assessment grade of "Good" and '''NO''' individual "Poor" grades.)''
 
'''Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.'''
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|Anything especially good?
 
|Suggestions for development:
 
|-
 
| colspan="2" |Agreed action:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
|}
 
              
 
 
 
'''Signature of assessor:                                         Signature of trainee:'''
 
 
 
 
 
5.2.1.12 Clinical Rating Scale CRSret (Outcome PS1a: Refraction)
 
 
 
'''COECSA  Workplace Based Assessments'''
 
 
 
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRSret (Outcome PS1a: Refraction)'''
 
 
 
All trainees must be able to perform an accurate refraction objective and subjective refraction, performing appropriate tests (for adults) and provide an appropriate prescription.
 
 
 
 
 
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                                                         Date (dd/mm/yyyy)                  
 
 
 
     YEAR1                                YEAR 2                            YEAR 3                                    YEAR 4                                   Other (specify)
 
 
 
Assessor's name:
 
 
 
 
 
Assessor's status:         Consultant                                               AHP                           Other (Specify)
 
 
 
 
 
Brief description of case                                      
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Attitude and manner'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' introduce themselves and  establish the identity of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse,  parent, carer). Their demeanour throughout the interview shows that they are  actively listening to the patient by gestures, words of encouragement and  appropriate eye contact. They establish a good rapport with the patient which  is respectful of any ethnic, religious or social preferences that they  express. They are empathic and sensitive to the patient’s concerns. They  ensure that the patient is comfortable and that adequate privacy is  maintained. They guide the patient considerately through the clinical  examination.
 
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' neither introduce  themselves nor identify the patient.  They hurry the patient and ignore what the patient is saying.  They look away or appear impatient during  the history taking.  They are unable to  establish rapport with the patient and show little respect. They pay little  or no attention to confirmation of patient comfort or privacy. They proceed  with the examination without adequate explanation and with little  consideration for patient comfort.
 
|-
 
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Introduction and start of interview
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Rapport with patient and development of trust
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Listening skills, appropriate eye contact and  non-verbal communication
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Empathy and sensitivity
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Respect for patient
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Retinoscopy'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' carry out an examination in  an appropriate environment, and allow adequate time for full cycloplegia if  needed.  They carry out an accurate  retinoscopy at a suitable working distance. Use of lenses and frames is tidy  and efficient. Their examination is fluent where possible and appropriate  opportunities are maximised when cooperation is suboptimal. Accurate notation  of retinoscopy, using power crosses and indication of working distances, is  used. An appropriate prescription is then calculated with an understanding of  adjustments made in relation to the clinical case. They carry out proper  subjective refraction.
 
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' position the patient or  themselves poorly. They do not allow adequate time for cycloplegia. They do  not attend to the room environment (patient comfort, lighting etc).  Retinoscopy is chaotic with untidy use of lenses and other equipment.  Notation of findings is unclear or ambiguous. They do not understand the  importance of adjusting the final prescription.
 
|-
 
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Patient positioning/room  setup
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Appropriate cycloplegia
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Use of trial frame/lenses
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Appropriate refining (Cross  cylinder, Duochrome test)
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Time taken/flow of  examination
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Accuracy of retinoscopy
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Notation of  retinoscopy/working distance
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Appropriate prescription  issued
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|'''Overall performance in this assessment'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
|-
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
'''Outcome''' (Delete as appropriate) '''           Pass/Fail'''
 
 
 
'''Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.'''
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|Anything especially good?
 
|Suggestions for development:
 
|-
 
| colspan="2" |Agreed action:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
|}
 
              
 
 
 
'''Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee'''
 
 
 
5.2.1.13 CRSret (Outcome PS1b: Cycloplegic Refraction)
 
 
 
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 
 
 
'''Clinical Rating Scale CRSret (Outcome PS1b: Cycloplegic Refraction)'''
 
 
 
All trainees must be able to perform an accurate cycloplegic refraction (especially on a child) and provide an appropriate prescription.
 
 
 
 
 
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                                                         Date (dd/mm/yyyy)                  
 
 
 
     YEAR1                                YEAR 2                            YEAR 3                                    YEAR 4            Other (specify)
 
 
 
Assessor's name:
 
 
 
 
 
Assessor's status:         Consultant                                               AHP                           Other (Specify)
 
 
 
 
 
Brief description of case                                      
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Attitude and manner'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' introduce themselves and  establish the name of the child and any other attendant (e.g. parent, carer).  They explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out. They  interact with the child using language and gestures appropriate for the  child’s age. They are sympathetic to any distress felt by the child or carer  and offer on-going encouragement and praise throughout the examination. They  display good judgement regarding the limitations of the assessment and  pursuit of clinical signs.
 
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' neither introduce  themselves nor identify the patient.  They are insensitive to distress felt by the  child and their carer. Their demeanour is often inappropriate for the child’s  age and they make little attempt to interact with the child. They offer  little or no encouragement. They needlessly prolong the examination to no  benefit.
 
|-
 
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Introduction and explanation  of examination
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Rapport with child/carer,  empathy and sensitivity to age and context
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Respect for child/carer
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Retinoscopy'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' carry out an examination in  an appropriate environment, and allow adequate time for full  cycloplegia.  They carry out an  accurate retinoscopy at a suitable working distance. Use of lenses and frames  is tidy and efficient. Their examination is fluent where possible and appropriate  opportunities are maximised when cooperation is suboptimal. Accurate notation  of retinoscopy, using power crosses and indication of working distances, is  used. An appropriate prescription is then calculated with an understanding of  adjustments made in relation to the clinical case.
 
 
 
'''Poor trainees''' position the patient or  themselves poorly. They do not allow adequate time for cycloplegia. They do  not attend to the room environment (patient comfort, lighting etc).  Retinoscopy is chaotic with untidy use of lenses and other equipment.  Notation of findings is unclear or ambiguous. They do not understand the  importance of adjusting the final prescription.
 
|-
 
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Patient positioning/room  setup
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Appropriate cycloplegia
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Use of trial frame/lenses
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Time taken/flow of  examination
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Accuracy of retinoscopy
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Notation of  retinoscopy/working distance
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Appropriate prescription  issued
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|'''Overall performance in this assessment'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
|-
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
'''Outcome''' (Delete as appropriate) '''           Pass/Fail''' 
 
 
 
'''Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.'''
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|              
 
 
 
Anything especially good?
 
|
 
 
 
 
 
Suggestions for development:
 
|-
 
| colspan="2" |
 
 
 
 
 
Agreed action:
 
|}
 
              
 
 
 
'''Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee'''
 
 
 
5.2.1.14 Clinical Rating scale CRS13 (CA13:  Gonioscopy)
 
 
 
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessments'''
 
 
 
'''Clinical rating Scale CRS13 (CA13: Gonioscopy)'''
 
 
 
All trainees must be able to perform gonioscopy using an indirect gonioscopy lens, identify the major angle landmarks, record their findings using a major grading system and clinically apply their findings.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Date (dd/mm/yyyy)         
 
 
 
YEAR1                                                                 YEAR 2                            YEAR 3                                    YEAR 4                                   Other (specify)
 
 
 
Assessor's name:
 
 
 
 
 
Assessor's status:          Consultant                                                 AHP                                                     Other (Specify)
 
 
 
 
 
Brief description of case(s)                                                                                     
 
 
 
'''Please grade the following areas using the scale below''' (use tick or cross)
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Attitude  and manner'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good  trainees''' introduce themselves and establish the  identity of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer).  Their demeanour throughout shows that they are attentive to the patient by  gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They clearly  explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out.  They ensure that the patient is comfortable  and that adequate privacy is maintained.
 
 
 
'''Poor  trainees''' fail to introduce themselves and do not  identify the patient.  They appear to  hurry or ignore what the patient is saying.  They do not explain the test in an appropriate manner.  They pay little or no attention to  confirmation of patient comfort or privacy.
 
|-
 
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Introduction  and explanation of examination
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Rapport  with patient, empathy and sensitivity to age and context
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Respect  for patient and their comfort
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="6" |'''Gonioscopy (Technique: indirect, dynamic, corneal light wedge)'''
 
|-
 
| colspan="6" |'''V good trainees''' ensure  adequate disinfection of the gonioscopy lens before and after use. They  anesthetize the eye. They do not cause corneal abrasions.  They record angle findings to within 1  grade of the assessor’s findings. They can identify all major angle landmarks,  perform the corneal light wedge technique and dynamic gonioscopy when  indicated.  They are conversant with  the different types of grading systems and understand the advantages and  disadvantages of each.
 
 
 
'''Poor  trainees''' have to be prompted to ensure disinfection  of gonioscopy lens before and after use.  They insert inappropriate quantities of anaesthetic drops or use  inappropriate drops.  They push roughly  on the patient’s eye with the lens and frequently cause trauma to the corneal  epithelium.  They have difficulty  identifying and interpreting the angle.  They do not know when or how to perform the corneal light wedge  technique or dynamic gonioscopy.  They  are not conversant with the major grading systems of the angle nor are they  able to explain the advantages and disadvantages of each. 
 
|-
 
|
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Consent  for test
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Application  of anaesthesia
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Stabilisation  of lids and eye
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Use of  the gonioscopy lens
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Accurate  angle recording within 1 grade of assessor
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Interpretation  of result
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Corneal  appearance after examination
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Care of  gonioscopy lens
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Infection  control
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|'''Overall  performance in this assessment'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
|-
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|} 
 
 
 
'''Outcome''' (Delete as appropriate) '''                             Pass/Fail'''
 
 
 
'''''NB The following boxes MUST be completed:'''''
 
 
 
                               
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|
 
 
 
 
 
Please  note any aspects which were especially good:
 
|-
 
|Please  note any suggestions for improvement and action points:
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
'''Signature of assessor:                                                                                           Signature of trainee:''' 
 
 
 
5.2.2 Case-based Discussion (CbD)
 
 
 
Competence in patient investigation, patient management, and community eye health, and some aspects of best practice domain is assessed using a CbD form. These forms can be completed by trainers in the following circumstances:
 
 
 
* During an out-patient clinic. Trainers and trainees may wish to    allocate 5-10 minutes to discuss the management of a patient seen during    an out-patient clinic. Case selection would be determined by either the    trainee or trainer. The trainee should have had some direct clinical role    with the patient e.g. history taking, clinical examination, investigations    ordered or interpreted, management decisions, management of complications,    critical incidents etc.
 
* At the end of an out-patient clinic. Trainers and trainees may wish    to allocate some time at the end of clinic to review a small number of    case notes where the trainee has had a significant role in the management    of the patient.
 
* Case presentations during postgraduate teaching. Trainees are often    asked to present cases at local or regional postgraduate teaching    sessions. A nominated trainer should complete a CbD form after the    presentation.
 
* During a designated teaching session. Trainers and trainees may    wish to allocate a period of one-to-one teaching or small group teaching    where cases are discussed and a CbD form completed.
 
 
 
A list of Clinical Scenarios (approximately 40) that cover most of the COECSA curriculum is provided in the Study Guide  link. Trainees should aim to cover all these scenarios in their case based discussions if possible so that their portfolio reflects a wide range of clinical management situations.
 
 
 
It is recommended that about half the cases for CbD are chosen by the trainee and half by the trainer.
 
 
 
Trainees need to complete 10 CbDs during each year of training and these should be suitably spread throughout the year. By the end of training a trainee's portfolio should contain at least 40 CbD forms. Case based discussion is an important way to show that a trainee is developing her or his patient management skills and that he/she is able to relate his/her knowledge and skills to everyday ophthalmic practice. It is therefore appropriate that the level of competence documented on the CbD forms during Yr1 and Yr2 is at a lower level than during Yr3 and Yr4.
 
 
 
'''Clinical Scenarios'''
 
 
 
As an ophthalmologist you will be expected to manage a range of clinical scenarios. This may involve referrals from other health professionals, patient self-referrals or screening for ophthalmic disease.
 
 
 
Below is a list of typical problems that may present to an ophthalmologist.
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|'''Symptoms'''
 
|'''Signs'''
 
|-
 
|
 
 
 
'''Decreased Vision'''
 
 
 
* '''Transient'''
 
* '''Sudden'''
 
* '''Gradual'''
 
* '''Painful'''
 
 
 
'''Diplopia'''
 
 
 
'''Distortion'''
 
 
 
'''Dry Eyes'''
 
 
 
'''Floaters'''
 
 
 
'''Headache'''
 
 
 
'''Night Blindness'''
 
 
 
'''Pain'''
 
 
 
* '''Ocular'''
 
* '''Periocular'''
 
 
 
'''Red Eye'''
 
 
 
'''Trauma'''
 
 
 
'''Visual Disturbance'''
 
 
 
'''Watery'''
 
|Ametropia
 
 
 
Corneal Opacities
 
 
 
Conjunctival Pigmentation
 
 
 
Dysgenesis/Colobomata
 
 
 
Lens Opacities
 
 
 
Lid Lumps
 
 
 
Lid Malposition
 
 
 
Macular Exudation
 
 
 
Nystagmus
 
 
 
Ocular Tumours
 
 
 
Optic Disc Atrophy/Swelling
 
 
 
Proptosis
 
 
 
Pupil Abnormalities
 
 
 
Raised Intraocular Pressure
 
 
 
Retinal Haemorrhages
 
 
 
Retinal Pigmentation
 
 
 
Strabismus
 
 
 
Visual Field Defects
 
 
 
Visual Handicap in a Child
 
 
 
Vasculature abnormalities
 
|-
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
During your training you will be expected to discuss the management of patients with seniors in the form of a Case-Based Discussion. You should ensure that during your training all these common clinical presentations have been covered in at least one case-based discussion.
 
 
 
In addition, these clinical scenarios may form a focus for learning. Using these commonly encountered scenarios enhances the value of on-the-job learning, increasing learning efficiency and relevancy.
 
 
 
Whilst learning about a patient with one of the above clinical problems you should consider which learning outcomes may be addressed. By thinking of the patient's problem in terms of the 10 learning outcome domains, you can integrate your knowledge (basic science and clinical), skills and attitudes.
 
 
 
The scenarios may be used in a variety of learning situations e.g. clinics, theatre, small / large group teaching, independent study.
 
 
 
 
 
5.2.2.1 Case-based Discussion (CbD) assessment form
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
 
 
 
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                                                         Date (dd/mm/year)
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
     YEAR1                           YEAR2                                             YEAR 3                            YEAR 4                                   Other (specify)
 
 
 
Assessor's name:
 
 
 
 
 
Assessor's status:         Consultant                                               AHP                           Other (Specify)
 
 
 
 
 
Clinical Scenario (see Study Guide )
 
 
 
 
 
Diagnosis
 
 
 
 
 
Overall difficulty of case                Simple                                                        Intermediate                                                                 Difficult
 
 
 
Subspecialty: Plastics/Lac/Orbits      Cornea/Ext       Cataract/Ref          Glaucoma       Retina/Uvea/Onco       Neuro        Paeds/Strab
 
 
 
(if identifiable)
 
 
 
'''Please grade the trainee’s performance under the curricular domains as listed below.'''
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|'''Topic'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|Medical Record Keeping
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Clinical Assessment
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Investigation and Referrals
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Treatment
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Follow-up and Future  Planning
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Professionalism
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Clinical Judgment
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|Leadership/Manager Issues
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|'''Overall performance in this  assessment'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
|-
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
'''Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.'''
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|
 
 
 
 
 
Please note any aspects which were  especially good (assessor):
 
|
 
 
 
 
 
Please note any suggestions for improvement  and action points (assessor):
 
 
 
 
 
|-
 
| colspan="2" |What have I learnt (Trainee):
 
|}
 
Now associate this to the 3 most relevant Learning Outcomes consider choosing one from each Curriculum theme
 
 
 
 
 
'''Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee:'''
 
 
 
 
 
_______________________                                                          _____________________________
 
 
 
 
 
5.2.3 Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS)
 
 
 
Competence in 19 of the 14 practical skills (PS) listed in the COECSA curriculum, and in surgical skills (SS13, SS14 and SS15) is assessed using a modified version of the F2 DOPS rating scale. [PS1 (refraction) is assessed by CRSretPS1a for adults, CRSret, Retinoscopy paediatric and formal COECSA examination.
 
 
 
How a practical procedure is taught will be determined by the individual trainer and informed by an appropriate training the trainers course. When trainees have the opportunity to perform the procedure themselves they must do so under appropriate supervision. The supervisor will be able to complete a DOPS at the end of the procedure. If there are aspects of the procedure that are not performed satisfactorily the completed DOPS will act as a guide for training and inform the next attempt. It is expected that for some of the more complex practical procedures e.g. PS2 "Drug administration", a trainee will require assessment on more than one occasion (heir portfolio will reflect  this). Where possible a trainee will arrange to have at least 2 satisfactory DOPS for each of the relevant Learning Outcomes. Where opportunities to perform a procedure are scarce e.g. PS11"Corneal glue", it may be appropriate for the portfolio to contain only one DOPS. The ultimate decision as to how many are appropriate will be the responsibility institution examination committee.
 
 
 
Where appropriate it is useful for initial DOPS to be completed using any simulators that are available e.g. in a clinical skills centre. The DOPS form must make it clear that the assessment has been carried out using a simulator.
 
 
 
Trainees should also maintain a logbook of procedures performed with reflective comments where appropriate as part of their portfolio.
 
 
 
Where a trainee has an opportunity to perform a practical procedure that is not included in the curriculum e.g. as part of sub-specialty training, she/he is encouraged to ask the trainer to complete a DOPS for inclusion in the portfolio.
 
 
 
The following practical skills Learning Outcomes are assessed by DOPS:
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
| colspan="2" |'''Learning Outcome(Click here for DOPS form)'''
 
|'''Target Year (TYA)*'''
 
|'''Comments'''
 
|-
 
|'''PS8'''
 
|Ocular surface FB
 
|1
 
|DOPS can be completed by an appropriately  trained nurse or senior resident
 
|-
 
|'''PS5'''
 
|Tear film
 
|2
 
|DOPS can be completed by senior Resident
 
|-
 
|'''PS6'''
 
|Lacrimal drainage
 
|
 
|DOPS can be completed by senior Resident
 
|-
 
|'''PS7'''
 
|Corneal scrape
 
|2
 
|
 
|-
 
|'''PS9'''
 
|Removal of sutures
 
|2
 
|DOPS can be completed by an appropriately  trained nurse
 
|-
 
|'''PS14'''
 
|Perform/teach hand hygiene
 
|2
 
|DOPS can be completed by an appropriately  trained nurse
 
|-
 
|'''PS2'''
 
|Local anaesthesia
 
|3
 
|May require several DOPS for different LA  techniques
 
|-
 
|'''PS10'''
 
|Fit a bandage contact lens
 
|3
 
|DOPS can be completed by an appropriately  trained nurse
 
|-
 
|'''SS13'''
 
|Laser to the lens capsule
 
|3
 
|
 
|-
 
|'''SS14'''
 
|Laser for raised intraocular pressure
 
|3/4 (annual review)
 
|May require several DOPS for different laser  therapies
 
|-
 
|'''S15'''
 
|Laser for retinal problems
 
|3/4 (annual review)
 
|May require several DOPS for different laser  therapies
 
|-
 
|'''PS3'''
 
|Diathermy
 
|3
 
|May be incorporated with a surgical OSATS
 
|-
 
|'''PS2'''
 
|Intraocular/periocular drugs
 
 
|May require several DOPS for different LA  techniques
 
|-
 
|'''PS4'''
 
|Cryotherapy
 
 
|May be incorporated with a surgical OSATS
 
|-
 
|'''PS11'''
 
|Corneal glue
 
 
|.
 
|-
 
|'''PS13'''
 
|Ocular /orbital ultrasound
 
 
|.
 
|-
 
|'''SS16'''
 
|AC/vitreous tap
 
 
|.
 
|-
 
|'''SS10'''
 
|Prepare biopsy
 
 
|.
 
|-
 
|'''PS12'''
 
|Forced duction test
 
 
|.
 
|}
 
<nowiki>*</nowiki> The TYA represents the latest year that a trainee should normally achieve the specified LO. Trainees are encouraged to seek assessment using DOPS when an opportunity arises and not wait until the target year.
 
 
 
By completion of training a trainee's portfolio may contain around 60 satisfactory DOPS forms
 
 
 
 
 
5.2.3.1 Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) form
 
 
 
'''COECSA Workplace Based Assessment and Feedback Form'''
 
 
 
'''Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS)'''
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                                                         Date (dd/mm/yyyy)                  
 
 
 
Trainee's year:            Year1                       Year 2                   Year 3            Year4                                Other (specify)
 
 
 
Assessor's name
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assessor's status           Consultant                      Senior Trainee                                Other (Specify)                                  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Learning Outcome     Title                                                                                                                                                                                      Code
 
 
 
                                 
 
 
 
Brief description of procedure
 
 
 
Overall difficulty of case                                        Simple                                                        Intermediate                                                                 Difficult
 
 
 
 
 
Number of times procedure performed before One                                                   Two to four                      Five to nine                                  More than nine          
 
 
 
 
 
Procedure performed on                                      Simulator                           Wet lab                       Volunteer                 Patient
 
 
 
'''Please grade the following areas using the scale below''' (use tick or cross)
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|
 
 
 
 
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
|'''n/a'''
 
|-
 
|1       Demonstrates understanding of  indications, relevant anatomy,          techniques  of procedure
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|2       Obtains  informed consent
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|3       Demonstrates  appropriate preparation pre-procedure
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|4       Appropriate  analgesia
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|5       Technical  ability
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|6       Aseptic  technique
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|7       Seeks  help where appropriate
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|8       Awareness  of potential complications and how to avoid them
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|9       Post  procedure management
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|10     Communication  skills
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|11     Consideration  to patient/professionalism
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|'''Overall performance in this assessment'''
 
|'''Poor'''
 
|'''Fair'''
 
|'''Good'''
 
|'''V Good'''
 
|-
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|}
 
'''Outcome''' (Delete as appropriate) '''           Meets Expectations/Does not meet Expectations    ''' (for stage of training)
 
 
 
'''Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.'''
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|Anything especially good? (assessor)
 
|Suggestions for development (assessor)
 
|-
 
| colspan="2" |What have I learnt? (trainee)
 
|}
 
 
 
 
 
'''Signature of assessor:                                                        Signature of trainee:'''
 
  
  
          
+
Evaluator initials:             

Latest revision as of 07:32, 15 December 2020

PREAMBLE

INTRODUCTION

The College of Ophthalmology of Eastern, Central and Southern Africa (COECSA) is a specialized virtual college. The college was registered in 2012 after a successful merger between the Eastern Africa College of Ophthalmologists (EACO) and the Ophthalmological Society of Eastern Africa (OSEA). The aim of this college is to address the chronic shortage of ophthalmologists in Eastern, Central and Southern Africa (ECSA) as well as improve the quality of eye care services in the region. The institution is anchored within the Vision 2020 framework developed under the aegis of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Agency for Prevention of Blindness (IAPB). Its establishment was informed by similar initiatives including the Medical Colleges in South Africa and the United Kingdom. However, COECSA aims to address the unique needs ECSA region based on evidence and priorities identified in the region. COECSA’s geographic focus is the ECSA region comprising Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Rwanda, Burundi, Malawi, Ethiopia, Zambia, South Sudan, Zimbabwe, Somalia and Mozambique. COECSA works closely with other players in  eye health and allied sectors in making interventions in the region.

Vision

Eye health for all in Eastern, Central and Southern Africa.

Mission

To improve the quality of eye care through training, research and advocacy; provide leadership in eye care; and create a forum for exchange of ophthalmic skills, knowledge and resources in Eastern, Central and Southern Africa.

Scope of COECSA’s work

COECSA’s work is derived from its mission. The College acts as the voice of the profession in the region, tasked to set the curriculum and examinations for trainee ophthalmologists, provide training in ophthalmology, set and maintain standards in the practice of ophthalmology and promote research and advance science in the specialty. COECSA is not a regulatory body and does not have a role in disciplinary actions relating to ophthalmologists. COECSA does not offer advice to patients on their individual condition or treatment options.

COECSA’s Mandate

COECSA operates within the wider environment of health in the region. However, eye health remains an obscure footnote in the health agenda. More often than not, focus on eye health is not given sufficient attention and support. COECSA and its partners wish to make better known the issues of eye health in the region. The mandate of COECSA is to:

  • Contribute to the  human resources  for  health through  quality  training in ophthalmology
  • Set standards for  professional  ophthalmic  practice
  • Facilitate continuing professional development
  • Contribute to health policy development 
  • Promote research which advances ophthalmology in the region
  • Create a forum for exchange of skills and knowledge
COECSA CURRICULUM

The COECSA curriculum offers regional consensus on what competences are required and what should be taught to residents. This curriculum is meant to be a guide for ophthalmology departments in designing training programs in their respective institutions. The curriculum will also act as a guide to trainees by providing a reference against which they can assess their progress. All institutions accredited to offer residency training programs shall be required to comply fully with the provisions of the College Council accreditation norms and standards.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The COECSA Residency Curriculum – 2020 Version has been developed following a review of the 2017 version of the curriculum based on recommendations from an independent consultancy which was commissioned by the College. The consultancy was a review of curriculum documents, an assessment on how they can be utilised and development of additional resources that will enhance and be supplementary to the existing curriculum. The curriculum review will now be conducted every after 5 years.

The key highlights of the 2020 Version aside from the general correction of formatting errors include:

  • A break of the different learning domains into detailed sub domains/competences
  • Defined learning milestones for each of the sub-domain
  • Assessment forms for each competence
  • Description of the Exams to be administered under the curriculum and an additional learning outcome on Gonioscopy


COECSA leadership wishes to acknowledge the immediate past President Dr. Ibrahim Matende under whose leadership the COECSA curriculum work was initiated. We further acknowledge the Education and Accreditation Committee for providing leadership in the development and review of the residency curriculum.  The College acknowledges in particular the able leadership of Dr. Anna Sanyiwa (Muhimbili University of Health &Allied Sciences), Chair of the Curriculum Subcommittee (2016-2019) under which this work was made a success.

We further acknowledge the following for the immense contributions towards development of the first version of this curricula.

  • Dr. Anne Ampaire Musika (from Makerere University, Uganda)
  • Dr. Seneadza Asiwome
  • Dr. Millicent Kariuki, Prof. Dunera Ilako and Dr. Kahaki Kimani (all of University of Nairobi, Kenya)
  • Dr. John Nkurikiye and Prof. Wanjiku Mathenge (both of Rwanda International Institute of Ophthalmology)
  • Dr. Levi Kandeke (Burundi)
  • Dr. Gerald Msukwa and Dr. Petros Kayange (University of Malawi),
  • Dr. Yeshigeta Gelaw (Jimma University, Ethiopia),
  • Dr. Grace Chipalo - Mutati (University Teaching Hospital, Zambia),
  • Dr. Geoffrey Wabulembo and Dr. Grace Ssali (Makerere University, Uganda),
  • Dr. William Makupa (Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre),  
  • Prof. Amos Twinamasiko and Dr John Onyango (both of Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Uganda)
  • Dr.  Elias Hailu (Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia)

We also extend our gratitude to the team that reviewed and compiled the 2020 Version of the curriculum, for their commitment and hard work. These are:

1.      Prof. Ciku Mathenge, (Rwanda International Institute of Ophthalmology, Rwanda)

2.      Dr. John Cropsey (Kibuye Hope Hospital, Burundi)

3.      Mr. Robert Ntitima (COECSA – Education and Training)

4.      Dr. Zipporah Phiri (University Teaching Hospital, Zambia)


Special thanks also go to the Royal College of Ophthalmologists (RCOphth, UK) curriculum team comprising Dr. David Cottrell, Dr. Mike Nelson, Dr. Fiona Spencer, Prof. Carrie MacEwen, Ms. Kathy Evans, Mrs. Emily Beet, Ms. Beth Barnes, Ms. Denise Mabey and Ms. Susannah Grant for the technical input and support throughout the development process.

We further appreciate Softcall Communications for developing the online curriculum management system and for offering technical and training support.


The College extends special gratitude to Tropical Health Education Trust (THET) for providing funding through the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) and the International Centre for Eye Health (ICEH) that made this process possible. We are particularly grateful to Mr. Nick Astbury and Ms. Marcia Zondervan of the LSHTM for their unrelenting support.


Last but not least, we would like to acknowledge the secretarial and logistical support of the COECSA Secretariat throughout this process.


Dr. John Nkurikiye

COECSA President

THE CURRICULUM AT A GLANCE

Rationale

As a virtual college, COECSA works closely with accredited residency training institutions in the region to deliver ophthalmology training. This curriculum is meant to be a guide for ophthalmology departments in designing training programs in their respective institutions. Departments will be expected to structure their programs according to the system in their universities.  At present, some universities still operate on term system while others have adapted the semester system.  Also program duration varies from one institution to the other. In most residency training institutions in the region, the ophthalmology residency program (Master of Medicine in Ophthalmology) runs for three years, while in some institutions it runs for four years.  Departments will therefore be required to organize the recommended content to fit within their own time structure. The curriculum will also act as a guide to trainees by providing a reference against which they can assess their progress.

All institutions accredited to offer residency training programs shall be required to comply fully with the provisions of the College accreditation norms and standards.

PROGRAM DELIVERY

Recommended length of COECSA Residency Program

To deliver all the learning outcomes in the COECSA curriculum, it is recommended that a residency training program should be structured to be completed in a minimum period of 4 years.

ASSESSMENT TOOLS

The resident will be assessed using the assessment and feedback tools recommended in the curriculum and by the COECSA examination. The assessment and feedback tools allow each workplace based assessment to be recorded and the minimum recommended numbers are included for the relevant learning outcomes.

COECSA residency curriculum adoption by existing training programs

The institutions that are just about to commence training are recommended to use the COECSA Competency Based Curriculum as the foundation of their training course. It is suggested that:

  • A presentation be made to have the COECSA Competency Based Curriculum accepted at the National Accrediting Authorities.
  • Existing institutions integrate the curriculum at the earliest opportunity during the curriculum review process.
  • A staff meeting / workshop be conducted to introduce the COECSA Competency Based Curriculum.
  • An introductory lecture at ophthalmology meetings locally or nationally could be used to introduce the COECSA Competency Based Curriculum to a wider audience.
  • All the parties involved should be encouraged to familiarize themselves with the learning outcomes and assessment / feedback tools. A workshop for making the assessment and feedback tools effective is important (see Training the Trainers).
  • Issuance of a Digital Version of the COECSA Competency Based Curriculum be made to each resident so they have access to it where web access is limited.
Achievement of learning outcomes

This curriculum has 139 learning outcomes (see 2.0: learning outcomes summary table). For the different learning outcomes to be achieved, reference should be made to the 10 domains of the COECSA curriculum to establish the specified target years of achievement.

The domains describe the outcomes which the ophthalmology trainee should strive to achieve and ophthalmologists should refer to these domains throughout the process of maintaining competence. The 10 domains include Basic & Clinical Sciences, Clinical Assessment, Patient Investigation, Patient Management and Practical Skills. Others are Surgical Skills, Community Eye Health, Communication, Best Practice and Management and Leadership.

It should be noted that the various domains have some crosscutting learning outcomes; thus, there is need to pay attention to the related learning outcomes while addressing a particular learning outcome.

Learning Methods/Delivery

A combination of several methods of delivery will be used to achieve face to face apprenticeship. The methods include Lectures, Clinical Work, Clinical Teachings, Tutorials, Seminars, Conferences and Demonstrations.

It will further be implemented through teaching in Surgical Skills Laboratory and Wet Lab, Log Books, Dissertations, Self-Directed Learning, Clinical Clerkship including normal working hours and calls as well as conducting Ward Rounds. Other methods include Supervising and Teaching the Junior Medical Staff who include undergraduate Medical Students and Paramedical Trainees, carrying out Call Duties as per the Hospital Schedule as well as external Clinical Rotations with the goal to have 2 external Clinical Rotations of 8 weeks each during the 2nd and 3rd Year of the Course.

THE SUMMARY TABLE

DOMAINS 1) Basic & Clinical Sciences 2) Clinical Assessment 3) Patient Investigation 4) Patient Management 5) Practical Skills 6) Surgical   Skills 7) Community Eye Health 8) Communication 9) Best Practice 10) Management and Leadership
                               LEARNING  OUTCOMES Anatomy And Embryology Clinical History Orthoptic Assessment Management Plan Refraction Simulation And Wet Lab Screening Establishing Rapport Learning Health Service Organization
Physiology Assess Vision Corneal Assessment Triage/Prioritization Periocular And Intraocular Drug Administration Operating Microscope Injury Prevention Active Listening Records Clinical Governance
Biochemistry & Cell Biology External Eye Examination Ultrasonography Therapeutics/Local And Systemic Therapies Diathermy/Cautery Aseptic Technique Disease Risk Reduction Delivering Information Guidelines Cooperation With Other Services
Pathology Pupil Examination Angiography Patient Selection For Surgery Cryotherapy Cataract Surgery Immunization And Supplementation Directing Patients To Information Portfolio Role As A Leader
Optics Ocular Motility Retinal And Optic Nerve Imaging Recognize And Manage Complications Assess Tear Film Surgery For Raised IOP Determining the magnitude and burden of blindness Obtaining Consent IT Role As A Community/Clinical Researcher
Clinical Ophthalmology IOP Measurement Radiology/ Other Imaging Emergencies/ First Aid/Resuscitation Assess Lacrimal Drainage Repair Trauma Develop Health Promotion Action Plan Breaking Bad News Manage Referrals Role As A Teacher
Clinical Pharmacology Slit Lamp Electrophysiology Rehabilitation And Low Vision Corneal Scrape Common Lid Surgery Barriers To Communication Waiting List Management Role As A Manager
General Medicine For Ophthalmology Fundus Examination Laboratory Investigations Refer Appropriately Ocular Surface Foreign Body Surgery For Surface Protection Body Language Use Of Databases Apply Clinical Reasoning Using An Evidence Based Approach
1) Basic & Clinical Sciences 2) Clinical Assessment 3) Patient Investigation 4) Patient Management 5) Practical Skills 6) Surgical   Skills 7) Community Eye Health 8) Communication 9) Best Practice 10) Management and Leadership
Research Methodology, Epidemiology And Evidence Based Medicine General Medical Examination Biometry Systemic Implications Removal Of Sutures Lateral Canthotomy/Lysis Respond To Complaints Critical Incident Management Departmental Audit
Instruments Paediatric/ Developmental Examination Visual Fields Spectacle Lenses Bandage Contact Lens Biopsy Eyelid And Ocular Tissue Communicate With Other Professionals Compassionate Personal Audit
Statistics Neuro Examination Contact lens and diagnostic equipment care Contact Lenses Corneal Glue Strabismus Surgery Keeping Clinical Records Patient Autonomy Health Economics/Managing Resources
Clinical Genetics Differential Diagnosis Forced Duction Test Removal Of Eye Write And Dictate Clearly Consideration Prepare Monitoring And Evaluation Tools Of Projects
Gonioscopy
Biometry Laser - Lens Capsule Preparing An Operating List Patient Empathy
Hand Hygiene Laser - Raised IOP Organizing Leave Patient Confidentiality
Laser - Retina Insight Into Limitations
AC/Vitreous Tap Seeking Help
Anterior Vitrectomy Appraisal And 360 Degree Feedback
Equality And Ethics
Probity
Practice According To National Legal Requirements
Data Protection
Human Tissue
Child Protection/ Safeguarding
Time Management
Reflective Practice
Self-Learning
Uncertainty
CPD
Career Development
Personal Health

COECSA DOMAINS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE SUMMARY

COECSA has defined 10 domains for clinical ophthalmology practice. These domains describe a framework of competencies applicable to all ophthalmologists across the continuum of professional development from formal medical education and training through to maintenance of professional competence. They describe the outcomes which the ophthalmology trainee should strive to achieve and ophthalmologists should refer to these domains throughout the process of maintaining competence.

The 10 domains include:

  1. Basic & Clinical Sciences          
  2. Clinical Assessment    
  3. Patient Investigation  
  4. Patient Management  
  5. Practical Skills              
  6. Surgical Skills
  7. Community Eye Health
  8. Communication            
  9. Best Practice
  10. Management and Leadership


The table below summarizes the competences for the learning outcomes in their respective domains.

PLEASE NOTE that in the various domains there are some crosscutting learning outcomes, hence the need to pay attention to the related learning outcomes while addressing a particular learning outcome.  

BASIC CLINICAL SCIENCES (BCS)[edit | edit source]

Anatomy and Embryology[edit | edit source]

                                               

BASIC CLINICAL SCIENCES (BCS)
Learning Outcome Anatomy and Embryology
Code BCS1
Description Trainees must understand and apply knowledge of the anatomy and embryology of the eye, adnexae, visual pathways and associated aspects of head, neck and neuro anatomy. It extends to applied anatomy relevant to clinical methods of assessment and investigation relevant to ophthalmic practice. They must be able to use this knowledge when interpreting clinical investigations and in the practice of ophthalmic surgery.
Assessment Portfolio/Log Book: And End Of Part 1 – Exams/ COECSA Exams
Target Year of Achievement Target Year 1- 2
Related Learning Outcomes BCS1-BC12
Other Links Study Guide  3.1.13, BSC1
Physiology[edit | edit source]
BASIC CLINICAL SCIENCES (BCS)
Learning Outcome Physiology
Code BCS2
Description Trainees must understand and apply knowledge of the physiology of the eye, adnexae and nervous system, including related general physiology. This includes the applied physiology relevant to clinical methods of assessment in ophthalmic practice. They must be able to use this knowledge when interpreting clinical symptoms, signs and investigations and in the practice of ophthalmic medicine and surgery.
Assessment Portfolio/Log Book: And End Of Part 1 – Exams/ COECSA Exams
Target Year of Achievement Target Year 1- 2
Related Learning Outcomes BCS1-BC12
Other Links Study Guide  3.1.13, BSC2
Biochemistry Molecular and Cell Biology[edit | edit source]
BASIC CLINICAL SCIENCES (BCS)
Learning Outcome Biochemistry Molecular and Cell Biology
Code BCS3
Description Trainees must understand and apply knowledge of the basic biochemistry and cell biology. This includes in particular those aspects relevant to common eye diseases. They must be able to use this knowledge when interpreting clinical symptoms, signs and laboratory investigations and in the practice of ophthalmic medicine and surgery.
Assessment Portfolio/log book: and end of Year /COECSA exams
Target Year of Achievement Target Year 1- 2
Related Learning Outcomes BCS1-BC12
Other Links Study Guide 3.1.13, BSC3
Pathology[edit | edit source]
BASIC CLINICAL SCIENCES (BCS)
Learning Outcome Pathology
Code BCS4
Description Trainees must understand and apply knowledge of pathology of the eye, adnexae and visual system. This includes histopathology, microbiology and immunology and other branches of pathology. They must be able to use this knowledge when interpreting clinical symptoms, signs and investigations and in the practice of ophthalmic medicine and surgery.
Assessment Portfolio/log book: and end of Year /COECSA exams
Target Year of Achievement Target Year 1-2
Related Learning Outcomes BCS1-BC12
Other Links Study Guide 3.1.13, BSC4
Optics[edit | edit source]
BASIC CLINICAL SCIENCES (BCS)
Learning Outcome Optics
Code BCS5
Description Trainees must understand and apply knowledge of optics, ultrasound and electromagnetic wavelengths relevant to ophthalmic practice. They must be able to use this knowledge when interpreting clinical symptoms, signs and investigations and in the practice of ophthalmic medicine and surgery.
Assessment Portfolio/log book: and end of Year /COECSA exams
Target Year of Achievement Target Year 1-2
Related Learning Outcomes BCS1-BC12
Other Links Study Guide 3.1.13, BSC5
Clinical ophthalmology[edit | edit source]
BASIC CLINICAL SCIENCES (BCS)
Learning Outcome Clinical ophthalmology
Code BCS6
Description Trainees must be able to evaluate a patient’s ocular, medical and surgical problems in order to formulate a differential diagnosis to serve as a basis for making laboratory and clinical investigations.
Assessment portfolio/log book and end Year 2-3/4 – Exams /COECSA exams
Target Year of Achievement Year 1,2,3 and 4
Related Learning Outcomes BCS1-BC12
Other Links Study Guide 3.1.13, BSC6
Clinical Pharmacology[edit | edit source]
BASIC CLINICAL SCIENCES (BCS)
Learning Outcome Clinical Pharmacology
Code BCS7
Description Trainees must understand and apply knowledge of clinical pharmacology relevant to ophthalmic practice. They must be able to use this knowledge when prescribing for a patient. They must understand the medications used in general medicine and surgery to a basic standard. They must be aware of the possible ocular effects of systemic and topical medications and systemic effects of ocular and systemic medications.
Assessment portfolio/log book and end Year 2-3/4 – Exams /COECSA exams
Target Year of Achievement Year 1.2, ¾
Related Learning Outcomes BCS1-BC12
Other Links Study Guide 3.1.13, BSC7
General Medicine for Ophthalmology[edit | edit source]
BASIC CLINICAL SCIENCES (BCS)
Learning Outcome General Medicine for Ophthalmology
Code BCS8
Description Trainees must understand and apply knowledge of general medicine and surgery relevant to ophthalmic practice. They must be able to recognise when a patient is seriously ill and make appropriate arrangements for the patient's care
Assessment portfolio/log book: and end Year /COECSA exams
Target Year of Achievement Year 1 ,2,3,4
Related Learning Outcomes BCS1-BC12
Other Links Study Guide  3.1.13, BSC8
Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence Based Medicine[edit | edit source]
BASIC CLINICAL SCIENCES (BCS)
Learning Outcome Clinical Epidemiology, Statistics and Evidence Based Medicine
Code BCS9
Description Trainees must understand and apply knowledge of clinical epidemiology, statistics and evidence based medicine relevant to ophthalmic practice. They must be able to use this knowledge during clinical assessment, interpreting investigations and planning clinical management for a patient. Their knowledge must include the influence of economic and political considerations (on a local and global scale) on individual and community health and how these may be influenced.
Assessment Cbd, journal club and Research Project and end of year/COECSA exams
Target Year of Achievement Year 1, 2,3,4
Related Learning Outcomes BCS1-BC12
Other Links Study Guide 3.1.13, BSC9
Instruments TECHNOLOGY[edit | edit source]
BASIC CLINICAL SCIENCES (BCS)
Learning Outcome Instruments
Code BCS10
Description All trainees must understand and apply knowledge of instrument technology relevant to ophthalmic practice.

They must be aware of the limitations of technology and the risks involved in their use.They must be able to maintain an understanding of new developments in relevant technologies.

Assessment Portfolio, logbooks and end of year/ COECSA exams
Target Year of Achievement Year 2 and Year ¾
Related Learning Outcomes BCS1-BC12
Other Links Study Guide 3.1.13, BSC10
BIOStatistics[edit | edit source]
BASIC CLINICAL SCIENCES (BCS)
Learning Outcome Biostatistics
Code BCS11
Description All trainees must understand and apply knowledge of statistics relevant to ophthalmic practice.

They must be able to use this knowledge in the interpretation and publication of research.

Assessment Presentations and Research Project, end of year/COECSA exams
Target Year of Achievement Year 1, 2
Related Learning Outcomes BCS1-BC12
Other Links Study Guide 3.1.13, BSC11
Clinical Genetics[edit | edit source]
BASIC CLINICAL SCIENCES (BCS)
Learning Outcome Clinical Genetics
Code BCS12
Description Trainees must understand and apply knowledge of clinical genetics relevant to ophthalmic practice. They must be able to use this knowledge when advising patients about patterns of inheritance. They must recognise when it is appropriate to refer a patient for genetic counselling. They must recognise when it is important to offer a consultation with family members.
Assessment Cbd, portfolio/log book and end of Year /COECSA Exams
Target Year of Achievement Year 1-2
Related Learning Outcomes BCS1-BC12
Other Links Study Guide 3.1.13, BSC12

                           

Basic Clinical Sciences Study Guides[edit | edit source]
ABBREV OUTCOME HOW CAN I ACHIEVE THIS OUTCOME HOW WILL THIS OUTCOME BE ASSESSED HOW CAN I HELP A TRAINEE ACHIEVE THIS OUTCOME
Resources Methods/ experience Indirect Direct
BCS1 Anatomy Text books, Web sites part 1 Reading Tutorials E learning Discussion forum Clinical and surgical anatomy knowledge in work based assessments COECSA Year  1 Written/clinical exam Explain clinical and surgical anatomy in clinical teaching sessions Encourage/facilitate tutorials Facilitate use of local medical school anatomy museum
BCS2 Physiology Text books, Web sites part 1 Reading Tutorials E learning Discussion forum Applied physiology knowledge in work based assessments Part 1

Written/clinical exam

Explain applied physiology in clinical teaching sessions Encourage/facilitate tutorials
BCS3 Biochemisty and Cell Biology Text books, Web sites part 1 Reading Tutorials E learning Discussion forum Applied science in work based assessments Part 1

Written/clinical exam

Explain applied biochemistry & cell biology in clinical teaching sessions Encourage/facilitate tutorials
BCS4 Pathology Text books, Web sites part1 Reading Tutorials E learning Discussion forum Clinical-pathologic al conferences Clinical discussions in work based assessments Part 1

Written/clinical exam -

Arrange clinical-pathology meetings Explain pathology, microbiology, immunology in clinical teaching sessions Encourage/facilitate tutorials Encourage learning with pathologists and microbiologists Facilitate use of local medical school pathology museum
BCS5 Optics Text books, Web sites Part1 syllabus Reading Tutorials E learning Discussion forum professionals Attend LVA sessions Attend optometric practice

Demonstrate use of Optic equipment

Clinical discussions in work based assessments Part 1

Written/clinical exam

Explain applied optics and medical physics in clinical teaching sessions Encourage/facilitate tutorials Encourage learning with optometrists
BCS6 Clinical Ophthalmology Text books, Web sites Part 1/2 syllabus

Skills/Wet Lab par 1,2,3

Reading Tutorials E learning Discussion forum Clinical discussions Part 2 preparation courses Clinical discussions in work based assessments Part 2

Case based discussions Case presentations

Arrange case discussions Encourage trainees to do case presentations Provide feedback Mock OSCEs Encourage learning with neurologists, rheumatologists etc.
BCS7 Clinical pharmacology Text books, Web sites Part 1 syllabus Reading Tutorials E learning Discussion forum Clinical-pharmacological conferences Applied science in work based assessments Part 1

Written/clinical exam

Explain clinical pharmacology in clinical teaching sessions Encourage/facilitate tutorials
BCS8 General medicine for ophthalmology Text books, Web sites Part 1 syllabus Part 2 syllabus Reading Tutorials E learning Discussion forum Clinical discussions Hospital grand rounds Clinical discussions in work based assessments Multi source feedback Part 1/Part 2

Case based discussions Case presentations

Arrange clinical updates from non-ophthalmic colleagues Encourage trainees to do case presentations Provide feedback Mock OSCEs Encourage learning with physicians/surgeons
BCS9 Clinical epidemiology and EBM Text books, Web sites Part 1/2 syllabus Reading Tutorials E learning Discussion forum Clinical discussions Journal club research Case presentations

Publishing research

Part 2

Written exam/Dissertation

Run journal clubs .Teach critical appraisal skills
BCS10 Instrument technology Text books, Web sites Part 1 syllabus Part 2 syllabus Reading Tutorials E learning Discussion forum Clinical discussions Case presentations Clinical discussions in work based assessments Rating scales Part 1/Part 2

Case based discussions Case presentations Trust based competence assessments

Arrange teaching on instruments. Provide feedback
BCS11 Biostatistics Text books, Web sites Part 1 syllabus Part 2 syllabus/Journals/Research Reading Tutorials E learning Discussion forum Journal club Research Statistics exercises/ Workshops Case presentations Publishing research Part 1/Part 2

Dissertation/Publications and research output

Encourage and provide research opportunities Provide feedback
BCS12 Clinical Genetics Text books, Web sites Part 1 Reading Tutorials E learning Discussion forum Clinical discussions Part 2 preparation courses Genetics clinics Clinical discussions in work based assessments Multi source feedback Part 1/Part 2

Case based discussions Case presentations

Arrange case discussions Encourage trainees to do case presentations Provide feedback Encourage learning with clinical geneticists

CLINICAL ASSESSMENT­ (CA)

Patient’s history[edit | edit source]
Learning outcome OVERVIEW[edit | edit source]
CLINICAL ASSESSMENT­
Learning Outcome Patient’s history
Code CA1
Description Trainees must be able to gather focussed information from patients or patient caretaker in an organised way and document the clinical situation based on the individual patient’s needs.
Assessment CRS1,portfolio/logbook and end of year review/ COECSA exams
Target Year of Achievement Year 1  and 2
Related Learning Outcomes CA1-CA12
Other Links Study Guide - 3.2.1.2 below
Patient’s history Study Guide[edit | edit source]

Think:

·        Many of your communication skills will have been acquired in your foundation training. How do these skills apply to an ophthalmic patient?

·        How should I proceed when there is conflict between the history from the patient and that from relatives and careers?

·        In what situations may it be helpful to revisit the history with the patient?

·        What aids to history-taking can be used? (e.g. Questionnaires etc.?)

·        How can I be sure that I have accurately identified the patient's concerns?

Activity:

·        Observe senior colleagues and ask them to observe you

·        With the patient's consent, video-record your consultation and discuss your performance with your trainer

Resources:

·        Fred Wilson. Practical Ophthalmology; A Manual for Beginning Residents. 5th Edition. San Francisco.  American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2005

Self Assessment:

·        Clinical Rating Form. Ask a colleague to observe your technique, complete a clinical rating form and give you feedback

Vision assessment[edit | edit source]
Learning outcome OVERVIEW[edit | edit source]
CLINICAL ASSESSMENT­
Learning Outcome Vision assessment
Code CA2
Description Trainees must be able: To assess visual acuity for both distance and near; to assess and interpret colour vision; to know the principles of contrast sensitivity assessment; to assess visual acuity in children and adults with barriers to communication; to assess vision outside the OPD environment and to perform and interpret confrontation visual fields.
Assessment CRS2, portfolio/logbook and end of year review/ COECSA exams
Target Year of Achievement Year 1 – 2
Related Learning Outcomes CA1-CA12
Other Links Study Guide  3.2.2.2 below
Vision assessment STUDY GUIDE[edit | edit source]

Think:

·        What is meant by 'visual acuity'?

·        What are the various related tests done in assessment of vision?

·        How do you assess vision in children or people with learning or communication difficulties?

·        How do you assess vision away from the eye clinic?

·        How can colour vision be assessed?

·        When is it appropriate to test colour vision?

·        Which test is best used for the different causes of impaired colour vision?

Knowledge:

·        Understanding the underlying principles, benefits and pitfalls of visual acuity assessment methods including Snellen, logMAR Sheridan-Gardner etc.

Activity:

•        Ask your orthoptist if you can participate in an orthoptist clinic assessing children’s vision

Resources:

•        Fred Wilson. Practical Ophthalmology; A Manual for Beginning Residents. 5th Edition. San Francisco.  American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2005

External eye examination[edit | edit source]
Learning outcome OVERVIEW[edit | edit source]
CLINICAL ASSESSMENT­
Learning Outcome External eye examination
Code CA3
Description Trainees must be able to perform an examination of the external eye – (sclera & cornea), ocular adnexae, eyelids, and orbits and face using appropriate equipment/instruments. They must be able to carry out further examination utilizing other techniques as indicated.
Assessment CRS3, portfolio/logbook and end of year review/ COECSA exams
Target Year of Achievement Year 1 – 2
Related Learning Outcomes CA1-CA12
External eye examination STUDY GUIDE[edit | edit source]

Resources:

·Fred Wilson. Practical Ophthalmology; A Manual for Beginning Residents. 5th Edition. San Francisco. American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2005

Self Assessment:

·Clinical Rating Form. Ask a colleague to observe your technique, complete a clinical rating form and give you feedback.

PUPIL EXAMINATION[edit | edit source]
­ LEARNING outcome OVERVIEW[edit | edit source]
CLINICAL ASSESSMENT­
Learning Outcome Examine the pupil and perform appropriate diagnostic pharmacological tests
Code CA4
Description Trainees must be able to assess the pupil for abnormalities of shape, size and reactions and interpret their findings. They must know how to perform and interpret appropriate pharmacological tests for specific pupil abnormalities.
Assessment CRS4, portfolio/logbook and end of year review/ COECSA exams
Target Year of Achievement Year 1 – 2
Related Learning Outcomes CA1-CA12
Other Links Study Guide -3.2.4.2 below
Examination of the pupils and perform diagnostic pharmacological tests STUDY GUIDE[edit | edit source]

Think:

  • ·What are the pupillary pathways?
  • ·What does a normal pupil look like?
  • ·What are the causes of an abnormal pupil?

Resources:

  • ·Kline LB, Bajandas FJ. The Pupil. Neuro-ophthalmology Review Manual. 5th ed. 2004
  • ·American Academy of Ophthalmology. Pupil. Neuro-ophthalmology. 1997.
  • ·Fred Wilson. Practical Ophthalmology; A Manual for Beginning Residents. 5th Edition. San Francisco. American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2005.

Self Assessment:

·Clinical Rating Form. Ask a colleague to observe your technique, complete a clinical rating form and give you feedback

Ocular Motility[edit | edit source]
Learning outcome OVERVIEW[edit | edit source]
CLINICAL ASSESSMENT­
Learning Outcome Ocular Motility
Code CA5
Description Trainees must be able: to perform and interpret cover tests; to assess and interpret ocular movements; to perform prism cover tests and to describe nystagmus if present.
Assessment CRS5, portfolio/logbook and end of year review/ COECSA exams
Target Year of Achievement Year 1 – 2
Related Learning Outcomes CA1-CA12
Other Links Study Guide -3.2.5.2 below
Perform a cover test and assess ocular motility STUDY GUIDE[edit | edit source]

Think:

·What are the actions of the extraocular muscles?

·This is an examination technique that requires a lot of practice

·What are the implications of the different types of nystagmus?

Activity:

·Spend time with your orthoptist and ask to participate in their clinics or the strabismus clinics.

Resources:

·Rowe F. Clinical Orthoptics. Blackwell; 2004.

·MacEwen CJ, Gregson RMC. Manual of Strabismus Surgery. 1st ed. Butterworth Heinemann; 2001.

·http://www.mrcophth.com/videosonclinicalexamination

·Fred Wilson. Practical Ophthalmology; A Manual for Beginning Residents. 5th Edition. San Francisco. American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2005

Self Assessment:

·Clinical Rating Form. Ask a colleague to observe your technique, complete a clinical rating form and give you feedback.

IOP measurement using various tonometers[edit | edit source]
Learning outcome OVERVIEW[edit | edit source]
CLINICAL ASSESSMENT­
Learning Outcome IOP measurement using various Tonometers
Code CA6
Description Trainees must be able to measure IOP accurately using a variety of tonometers and understand the limitations of each. They must be able to check the calibration of the tonometer.
Assessment CRS6, portfolio/logbook and end of year review/ COECSA exams
Target Year of Achievement Year 1 – 2
Related Learning Outcomes CA1-CA12
Measure intraocular pressure using applanation tonometry STUDY GUIDE[edit | edit source]

Think:

·How would I feel if I were the patient having applanation done for the first time, and how can I help them to relax appropriately?

·What can make the measurement of IOP less accurate? - How can I ensure the most accurate result possible?

·What factors should influence my interpretation of the result?

·In what situations should I be wary of performing applanation?

·What damage could applanation cause to the patient?

Activity:

·Watch senior colleagues and discuss the nuances of their technique

Resources:

·http://www.opt.indiana.edu/riley/HomePage/new_Goldmann_tonometry/2Goldmann_Tonometry.html

·Fred Wilson. Practical Ophthalmology; A Manual for Beginning Residents. 5th Edition. San Francisco. American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2005

Slit lamp examination[edit | edit source]
Learning outcome OVERVIEW[edit | edit source]
CLINICAL ASSESSMENT­
Learning Outcome Slit Lamp Examination
Code CA7
Description Trainees must be able to examine the eye and adnexae using the slit lamp and interpret their findings. They must know the indications for and uses of different kinds of illumination and filters. They must know the proper care and economical use of the instrument.
Assessment CRS7, portfolio/logbook and end of year review/ COECSA exams
Target Year of Achievement Year 1 – 2
Related Learning Outcomes CA1-CA12
Other Links Study Guide -3.2.7.2 below
Slit lamp biomicroscopy EXAMINATION STUDY GUIDE[edit | edit source]

Think:

·It is important to know exactly how the slit lamp and its accessories work

Activity:

·Make sure that you can use the  hand held and the table-mounted slit lamp microscope

·Ask a senior to observe and confirm your gonioscopic technique and findings

·Get a senior colleague to show you and the instruction manuals are a useful resource!

Resources:

·Fred Wilson. Practical Ophthalmology; A Manual for Beginning Residents. 5th Edition. San Francisco. American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2005

Fundoscopy[edit | edit source]
Learning outcome[edit | edit source]
CLINICAL ASSESSMENT­
Learning Outcome Fundoscopy
Code CA8
Description Trainees must be able to examine the fundus using a direct and indirect ophthalmoscope, and slit lamp biomicroscopy (with contact and non-contact lenses).  They must understand the optics of the techniques and the resulting images.  They must be able to examine the peripheral retina with indentation
Assessment CRS8a CRS8b CRS8c CRS8d   end of year exams, COECSA Exams
Target Year of Achievement Year 1 – 2 yr program/ Year 3/4 yr program
Related Learning Outcomes CA1-CA12
Other Links Study Guide -3.2.8.2 below
FUNDOSCOPY STUDY GUIDE[edit | edit source]

Think:

·Is pupil dilation necessary to achieve adequate examination?

·Scleral indentation is a skill that takes a lot of practice

·When is it appropriate to use the different types of lenses that are available for fundus examination? How do all the techniques differ in magnification, orientation of the retinal image and field of view?

Activity:

·Take as many opportunities as you can to practice

·Watch senior colleagues and discuss the nuances of their technique, then practice again

Resources:

·Rosenthal ML. The Technique of Binocular Indirect Ophthalmoscopy. In: Hilton GF, McLean EB, Chuang EL, editors. Retinal Detachment. 5th ed. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 1989: 160-203.

·Fred Wilson. Practical Ophthalmology; A Manual for Beginning Residents. 5th Edition. San Francisco. American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2005

Self Assessment:

·Clinical Rating Form. Ask a colleague to observe your technique, complete a clinical rating form and give you feedback.

General Medical examination[edit | edit source]
Learning outcome OVERVIEW[edit | edit source]
CLINICAL ASSESSMENT­
Learning Outcome General Medical examination
Code CA9
Description Trainees must be able to perform a basic medical examination relevant to ophthalmic disease and understand the importance of their findings so as to be able to know when a patient requires appropriate referral.
Assessment Portfolio/logbook and end of year review/exams
Target Year of Achievement Year 1 – 2 yr program/ Year 3/4 yr program
Related Learning Outcomes CA1-CA12
Other Links Study Guide -3.2.9.2 below
General medical examination STUDY GUIDE[edit | edit source]

Think:

·Many of your general medical examination skills will have been developed during your foundation years. Which ophthalmological problems would prompt you to use these skills as an ophthalmologist?

·When should I request a chaperone?

Activity:

·Offer to help a medical trainee with eye examination skills for postgraduate examinations if they will help you with your general medical examination skills (record this in your portfolio)

Resources:

·MacLeod's Clinical Examination 11th Edition. ISBN 0443074046. April 2005. Editors: Douglas,G. Nicol,F. Robertson,C.

Paediatric developmental examination[edit | edit source]
Learning outcome Overview[edit | edit source]
CLINICAL ASSESSMENT­
Learning Outcome Paediatric developmental exam
Code CA10
Description The trainee should be able to perform an appropriate assessment of a child’s developmental milestones, understand the associations between systemic and ophthalmic diseases and recognise when it is appropriate to seek a paediatric opinion.
Assessment Portfolio/logbook and end of year review/exams
Target Year of Achievement Year 1 – 2 / Year 3-4
Related Learning Outcomes CA1-CA12
Other Links Study Guide -3.2.10.2 below
Paediatric and developmental examination STUDY GUIDE[edit | edit source]

Think:

  • ·What developmental milestones would you expect a two year old have?
  • ·What key areas should be examined in a child concerning their development?
  • ·when should a paediatric specialist’s opinion be sought

Activity:

·Offer to help a paediatric trainee with eye examination skills for postgraduate examinations if they will help you with your paediatric examination skills (record this in your portfolio)

Resources:

·MacLeod's Clinical Examination 11th Edition. ISBN 0443074046. April 2005. Editors: Douglas,G. Nicol,F. Robertson,C.

Neurological examination[edit | edit source]
Learning outcome Overview[edit | edit source]
CLINICAL ASSESSMENT­
Learning Outcome Perform a focused neurological examination taking into account the associations between systemic and ophthalmic diseases
Code CA11
Description Trainees must be able to perform a basic neurological assessment with particular emphasis on the cranial nerves and conditions relevant to ophthalmic disease. They must be able to recognise when serious neurological problems are present that require the opinion of a neurologist. They must be able to recognise neurological emergencies.
Assessment Portfolio/logbook and end of year review/exams
Target Year of Achievement Year 1 – 2 yr program/ Year 3/4 yr program
Related Learning Outcomes CA1-CA12
Other Links Study Guide -3.2.11.2 below
Perform a focused neurological examination STUDY GUIDE  [edit | edit source]

Think:

·Many neurological problems present to the ophthalmologist and a competent neurological assessment of patients is required

Activity:

  • ·Arrange sessions with your local neurology/neurosurgical department in their clinics or ward rounds to develop your examination skills
  • ·Offer to help a medical trainee with eye examination skills for postgraduate examinations if they will help you with your neurological examination skills (record this in your portfolio)

Resources:

·MacLeod's Clinical Examination 11th Edition. ISBN 0443074046. April 2005. Editors: Douglas,G. Nicol,F. Robertson,C.

Differential diagnosis[edit | edit source]
Learning outcome Overview[edit | edit source]
CLINICAL ASSESSMENT­
Learning Outcome Formulate a differential diagnosis
Code CA12
Description Trainees must be able to formulate and justify an appropriate differential diagnosis for a patient as part of the management plan.  They must be able to identify the most likely diagnosis and initiate management.  They must consider the common conditions as well as the rare but important ones in the differential diagnosis.
Assessment CbD, Portfolio/logbook and end of year review/exams
Target Year of Achievement Year 1 – 2 yr program/ Year 3/4 yr program
Related Learning Outcomes CA1-CA12
Other Links Study Guide -3.2.12.2 below
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS STUDY GUIDE[edit | edit source]

Activity:

  • ·Make it routine at the end of a consultation to document a differential diagnosis.
  • ·Make sure that you discuss your differential diagnosis during CbD

Resources:

  • The Wills Eye Manual: Office and Emergency Room Diagnosis and treatment of Eye Disease. Kunimoto et al. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins (2004)
  • Oxford Textbook of Ophthalmology. Easty and Sparrow. Oxford Medical Publications (1999)

Assessments:

  • ·Case based discussions
  • ·Part 1 COECSA
  • ·Part 2 COECSA. OSCE
Gonioscopy[edit | edit source]
Learning outcome OVERVIEW[edit | edit source]
CLINICAL ASSESSMENT
Learning Outcome Gonioscopy
Code CA13
Description Trainees must be able to perform gonioscopy with an indirect gonioscopy lens, identify anterior chamber angle anatomy and interpret the clinical significance of their findings.  They should be able to use the major angle grading systems clinically.
Assessment CRS13, portfolio/logbook and end of year review/ COECSA exams
Target Year of Achievement Year 1 – 2
Related Learning Outcomes CA1 - CA12
Other Links Study Guide -3.2.13.2 below
Gonioscopy Study Guide  [edit | edit source]

Think:

  • ·Why is gonioscopy physically required to see the angle and why is it needed clinically?
  • ·How would I feel if I were the patient having gonioscopy done for the first time, and how can I help them to relax appropriately?
  • ·What are the major classes of gonioscopy lenses and how do their uses differ?
  • ·What are the anatomic landmarks of the angle?
  • ·What landmark can be identified using the corneal light wedge technique?
  • ·How can one distinguish an open angle from a closed angle?
  • ·What is dynamic gonioscopy and when does it help you assess the angle?
  • ·What are the major grading systems used in evaluating/reporting the angle?
  • ·In what situations should I be wary of performing gonioscopy?
  • ·What damage could gonioscopy cause to the patient?

Activity:

  • ·Watch senior colleagues and discuss the nuances of their technique.
  • ·Perform gonioscopy on all glaucoma patients.
  • ·Perform the corneal light wedge technique to identify Schwalbe’s line.
  • ·Perform dynamic gonioscopy with an indirect Posner, Sussman or Zeiss style lens.

Resources:

  • ·Alward, W. L. M. (2007) Atlas of Gonioscopy. gonioscopy.org
  • ·eyewiki.aao.org/Gonioscopy
  • ·American Academy of Ophthalmology, Glaucoma, Section 10. Basic and Clinical Science Course. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2014:38-42.

ASSESSMENTS

Assessments Overview

Broadly speaking the learning outcomes for each domain of clinical practice are assessed as follows:

Domain of Practice Assessment
BCS Basic and clinical sciences Part 1 COECSA, Part 2 COECSA exams
CA Clinical assessment WpBA*rating scales, Part 2 COECSA exams
PI Patient investigation WpBA*rating scales, Part 2 COECSA exams
PM Patient management WpBA*rating scales ,Part 2 COECSA exams
PS Practical skills WpBA*rating scales ,Part 2 COECSA exams
SS Surgical skills WpBA*rating scales, Part 2 COECSA exams
CEH Community eye health WpBA*rating scales ,Part 2 COECSA exams
Com Communication WpBA*rating scales ,Part 2 COECSA exams
BP Best practice WpBA*rating scales
ML Management and leadership WpBA*rating scales

EXAMINATIONS

A.     Summative assessment in Ophthalmology residency

To qualify as an ophthalmologist under COECSA, a candidate must pass:

  • ¨  Basic sciences exam ( Part1)
  • ¨  Refraction and Optics (intermediate)
  • ¨  Ophthalmic medicine and Ophthalmic surgery exam( Part 2)
  • ¨  Clinical final exam
  • ¨  (Dissertation/Publication)


B.      Exams: Part 1 (Visual/Basic Sciences & Refraction and Optics)

  • ¨  COECSA Part 1: ideally done during the first year of training. In the interim period, COECSA has opted to use ICO part one for convenience. The standards of ICO exams are universally accepted and a good number of residents are already sitting it in the region.
  • ¨  ICO Part 1 will be adopted as COECSA part 1 till April 2021.
  • ¨  The University MMed part 1 will be accepted as equivalent till end of 2019
  • ¨  In 2020, COECSA senate shall assess the value of ICO exams for COECSA, and decide whether to continue or set own?
  • ¨   From March 2022, COECSA will have its own part 1 exam if a decision to go that route is taken.
  • ¨  Further, COECSA Optics and refraction exam will also be the ICO exam from April 2019 until April 2022.
  • ¨   COECSA will have its own exam intermediate exam (Optics) from March 2023
  • ¨  MMed Optics and Refraction (if any), will be accepted as equivalent till End of December 2020


C.       Exams: Part 2 (Opth medicine and surgery)

  • ¨  COECSA Ophthalmic Medicine and surgery part 2 exam will be the ICO exam from April 2021 till March 2024.
  • ¨  MMed part 2 exam will be accepted as equivalent till end of 2021.
  • ¨  From April 2025, COECSA will have its own part 2 exam subject to College Senate decision

D.      Clinical Final Exam

  • ¨  The current COECSA Fellowship Exam will remain as the final exit Clinical Exam

Target Year of Achievement (TYA)

These are summarized as follows:

TYA Explanation Example
Year 1 This LO must normally be achieved during the first year of training and by the end of year 1 at the latest. CA1 (Clinical history)
Year 2 This LO must normally be achieved during the first or second year of training and by the end of year 2 at the latest. Failure to achieve a significant number of these LO before the end of year 2 without mitigating circumstances may lead to a trainee being removed from the training programme. BCS (Basic & Clinical Sciences)
Year 3 This LO must normally be achieved during the first three years of training and by the end of year 3 at the latest. Failure to achieve a significant number of these LO before year 3 may require year 3 to be repeated. SS4 (Cataract)

PS1 (Refraction)

Year 1,2,3/4 annual review This LO must be achieved before the end of year 2 and will be assessed annually thereafter. BP10-30

COM1-14

Year 3/4 This LO must be achieved in order to complete the core curriculum. It is unlikely to be achieved in the first two years of training but may be achieved anytime during years 3/4 SS5 (surgery to lower IOP)

WorkPLACE BaseD Assessments

The following WpBA assessment tools are available for Training:

Tool Code Number of tools Main Learning Outcome Domains Assessed
Clinical Rating Scale (modified CEX) CRS 8 Clinical Assessment; Practical Refraction
Case based Discussion CbD 1 Patient Investigation; Communication; Patient Management; Best Practice; Community Eye Health; Management and Leadership; Basic and Clinical Sciences
Direct Observation of Procedural Skills DOPS 1 Practical Skills; Communication; Patient Investigation
Objective Assessment of Surgical and Technical Skills


Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubric

OSATS


OSCAR

4 Surgical Skills; Communication
Multi-source feedback (modified PAT) MSF 1 Communication; Best Practice

The WpBA tools are available through the website to download for completion, validation by the trainer and can be stored in a paper-based portfolio/e-portfolio (when available). Guidance is available at your institution about who should be the assessor as not all assessments need to be performed by a consultant ophthalmologist. The target year of achievement (TYA) guidance indicates when each WpBA should be achieved.

If a trainee does not complete an assessment successfully, the assessment tool will act as a useful source of feedback and allow preparation for a subsequent assessment. It therefore allows for both formative (developmental) and summative (competence) assessment. Trainees should be encouraged to undergo formative assessment regularly as part of their training and not see 'failure' at an assessment as a problem. Trainees should keep all assessment forms in their portfolio to show that they are obtaining appropriate feedback and making progress. A portfolio that only contains 'passed' assessments should be discouraged - there should be a "culture of deferred success". A variety of assessors should be used, and especially where two satisfactory assessments are required in any year these should be completed by different assessors where possible.


MILESTONES

Milestones are knowledge, skills, attitudes, and other attributes organized in a developmental framework from less to more advanced.  They are descriptors and targets for resident performance as the resident moves from entry into residency through graduation.  These milestones were adapted from the ACGME Milestones used for residency training in the USA facilitated by the International Council of Ophthalmology and Orbis International. Each of the COECSA sub-domains of performance have been mapped to the milestones. The original ACGME milestone language has been modified when necessary to reflect practice in the COECSA region and correspond to the COECSA Curriculum. 

Every six months, the level of milestones that best describes each resident’s current performance level should be selected based on appropriate assessment methods. The suggested methods are listed after each milestone.  Thus, a variety of assessment tools must be completed every 6 months. These include oral and/or written tests, multisource feedback (360 degree assessment), observed clinical evaluations (CRS, OCEX) and assessments of procedural and surgical skill (DOPS, OSATS, OSCAR). This reporting form should be reviewed with each resident individually to give feedback regarding their progress. Completion of the milestone document will show if there are specific weaknesses in individual residents and allow early detection and hopefully successful remediation.

Milestones are arranged into expectations based on progression through training and not necessary according to the year of residency.  Level 3 corresponds to the halfway point of training which will depend on the number of years of training the program has. Selection of a level implies that the resident substantially demonstrates the milestones in that level as well as those in earlier level.  (See Reporting Form diagram below.)   

Level 1: The resident demonstrates milestones expected of someone at the beginning ophthalmology residency.  

Level 2: The resident is advancing and demonstrating year 1 milestones.  

Level 3: The resident continues to advance and is demonstrating additional milestones; the resident consistently demonstrates the majority of milestones targeted for mid residency. 

Level 4: The resident has advanced so that he or she now substantially demonstrates the milestones targeted for residency.  This level is designed as the graduation target. Successfully graduating residents should be achieving this level in all areas.

Level 5: The resident has advanced beyond performance targets set for residency and is demonstrating “aspirational” goals which might describe the performance of someone who has been in practice for several years.  It is expected that only a few exceptional residents will reach this level.  

PORTFOLIO

The trainee's portfolio serves 2 important purposes for WBA:

  • It contains all of the documents produced through the WBA tools described above
  • It contains evidence that the trainee collects to show that they have met the remaining LO in the curriculum

The trainee should regularly maintain the portfolio and use it for the following:

  • To store and organize WBA documents as they occur
  • To record clinical experience (log book)
  • To reflect upon clinical experience and plan learning (reflective diary)
  • To record meetings with educational supervisor (appraisal documents)
  • To prepare for the annual assessment (revalidation)
  • To record formal and informal learning episodes (CPD document)
  • To store audit/research/teaching activities
  • To record any critical incidents, complaints, guidelines (clinical governance)
  • Any other information that supports the trainee's Good Medical Practice e.g. letters from patients, feedback

Specific Learning Outcomes that are assessed at the annual assessment by reviewing the portfolio are:

Learning Outcome (LO) Target Year (TYA)* Example of possible evidence
  PS1 Refraction 2 DOPS
PS13 Biometry 2 DOPS
PS14 Hand Hygiene 1 MSF
BP17 Appraisal and 360 degree feedback 2 Record of discussion, MSF,
BP19 Probity 1 Statement
BP20 Practice according to National Legal requirements 2 Record of discussion,  MSF
BP21 Data Protection 1 Record of discussion
BP22 Human Tissue 2 Record of discussion
BP23 Child Protection and safeguarding 2 Record of discussion
BP30 Personal Health 1 Statement
  PS8 Ocular surface foreign body 1 DOPS forms
  PS7 corneal scrape 1 DOPS forms
  SS2 Operating Microscope 1 OSATS forms

QUALITY ASSURANCE

In order to ensure that trainees have undergone the same training, quality assurance (QA) tools will be demanded at the end of the training programme as part of the assessment.


APPENDIX

ThE COECSA MILESTONES

Milestone Reporting

This section presents milestones designed for programs to use in semi-annual review of resident performance. Milestones are knowledge, skills, attitudes, and other attributes organized in a developmental framework from less to more advanced.  They are descriptors and targets for resident performance as the resident moves from entry into residency through graduation.  These milestones were adapted from the ACGME Milestones used for residency training in the USA facilitated by the International Council of Ophthalmology and Orbis International. Each of the COECSA sub-domains of performance have been mapped to the milestones. The original ACGME milestone language has been modified when necessary to reflect practice in the COECSA region and correspond to the COECSA Curriculum.  


Every six months, the level of milestones that best describes each resident’s current performance level should be selected based on appropriate assessment methods. The suggested methods are listed after each milestone.  Thus, a variety of assessment tools must be completed every 6 months. These include oral and/or written tests, multisource feedback (360 degree assessment), observed clinical evaluations (CRS, OCEX) and assessments of procedural and surgical skill (DOPS, OSATS, OSCAR). This reporting form should be reviewed with each resident individually to give feedback regarding their progress. Completion of the milestone document will show if there are specific weaknesses in individual residents and allow early detection and hopefully successful remediation.


Milestones are arranged into expectations based on progression through training and not necessary according to the year of residency.  Level 3 corresponds to the halfway point of training which will depend on the number of years of training the program has. Selection of a level implies that the resident substantially demonstrates the milestones in that level as well as those in earlier level.  (See Reporting Form diagram below.)

   

Level 1: The resident demonstrates milestones expected of someone at the beginning ophthalmology residency.  

Level 2: The resident is advancing and demonstrating year 1 milestones.  

Level 3: The resident continues to advance and is demonstrating additional milestones; the resident consistently demonstrates the majority of milestones targeted for mid residency. 

Level 4: The resident has advanced so that he or she now substantially demonstrates the milestones targeted for residency.  This level is designed as the graduation target. Successfully graduating residents should be achieving this level in all areas.

Level 5: The resident has advanced beyond performance targets set for residency and is demonstrating “aspirational” goals which might describe the performance of someone who has been in practice for several years.  It is expected that only a few exceptional residents will reach this level.  

COECSA Milestones Template Description

The diagram below presents an example set of milestones for one sub-competency in the same format as the milestone report worksheet.  For each reporting period, a resident’s performance on the milestones for each sub-competency will be indicated by:


·        selecting the level of milestones that best describes the resident’s performance in relation to the milestones

Or

·        selecting the “Has not Achieved pre-residency level” option

Each COECSA curriculum Sub-domain is mapped to the appropriate milestone here    
PC-1 Patient Interview

COECSA CA1, CA10

Has not achieved Level 1 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
NA for PC-1


Filling this box at the first assessment means the trainee has made no progress since enrolment

COECSA Milestones Template Description

1.  Obtains and documents basic history for ophthalmic complaint 1. Acquires accurate and relevant problem-focused history for common ocular complaints


2. Obtains and integrates outside medical records


1. Obtains relevant historical subtleties including paediatric milestones in children that inform and prioritize both differential diagnoses and diagnostic plans, including sensitive, complicated, and detailed information that may not often be volunteered by the patient 1.  Demonstrates role model interview techniques to obtain subtle and reliable information from the patient for junior members of the healthcare team, particularly for sensitive aspects of ocular conditions 1. Incorporates new information from literature to tailor interview questions



Selecting a response box on the line in between levels indicates that milestones in lower levels have been substantially demonstrated as well as some milestones in the higher levels.

Comments:           

Selecting a response box in the middle of a level implies that milestones in that year and in lower levels have been substantially demonstrated.    

Assessment method indicated here

COMPLETE LIST OF COECSA MILESTONES

PATIENT CARE AND PROCEDURAL SKILLS

Residents must be able to provide patient care that is compassionate, appropriate, and effective for the treatment of health problems and the promotion of health. Residents must demonstrate competency in:

PC-1 Patient Interview

COECSA CA1, CA10

Has not

Achieved

Level 1

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1.  Obtains and documents basic history for ophthalmic complaint 1. Acquires accurate and relevant problem-focused history for common ocular complaints


2. Obtains and integrates outside medical records


1. Obtains relevant historical subtleties including paediatric milestones in children that inform and prioritize both differential diagnoses and diagnostic plans, including sensitive, complicated, and detailed information that may not often be volunteered by the patient 1.  Demonstrates role model interview techniques to obtain subtle and reliable information from the patient for junior members of the healthcare team, particularly for sensitive aspects of ocular conditions 1. Incorporates new information from literature to tailor interview questions



Comments:           

         Assessment Tools: Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)

PC-2 Patient Examination

COECSA CA2-11

Has not

Achieved

Level 1

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1.  Describes components of complete ophthalmic examination


2. Performs the basic parts of a screening or bedside eye examination without special equipment

1. Performs and documents a complete ophthalmic examination targeted to a patient’s ocular complaints and medical condition


2. Distinguishes between normal and abnormal findings

1.  Performs problem-focused exam and document pertinent positive and negative findings


2. Consistently identifies common abnormalities; may identify subtle findings

1.  Identifies subtle or uncommon findings of common entities and typical or common findings of rarer entities 1. Incorporates into clinical practice new literature about exam techniques
Comments:           

Assessment Tools:  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)

PC-2A Vision Testing & Low Vision

COECSA CA2, PM7, PM10, PM11, PS1

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1. Check visual acuity (VA) in each eye with a near card and perform confrontation visual field testing 1. Accurately measure and document VA, routine refractive errors, and color and field deficits, including Amsler grid

2. Recognize when low vision services are needed

1. Perform more difficult refractions; use retinoscopy to refine technique and diagnose

2. Ability to prescribe glasses and contact lenses appropriately

2. Describe types of low vision devices.

1. Perform complicated refractions, including post-operative; apply specialized visual tests (e.g., vertical prism test for non-organic visual loss) 1. Develop advanced techniques for measuring vision in unusual circumstances
                                                                                                              
Comments:           

Assessment Tools:  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)

PC-2B External

COECSA CA3

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 4 Level 5
1. Describe components of external exam 1. Detect obvious abnormalities (e.g., ptosis, exophthalmos); assess 5th and 7th cranial nerve function 1. Identify less obvious abnormalities (e.g., mild ptosis, lid retraction, globe dystopia) 1. Detect or verify most subtle abnormalities; confirm presence or absence of pertinent disease-specific findings (e.g., floppy lid, subtle retropulsion resistance) 1. Develop advanced techniques for assessing external exam findings in unusual circumstances
                                                                                                                  
Comments:           

Assessment Tools:  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)

PC-2C Ocular Motility/Orthoptic Evaluation

COECSA CA5, PI1, PS12

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1. Describe components of ocular motility exam; test versions and ductions 1. Accurately test and record ductions, versions, saccadic and pursuit movements; detect obvious ocular misalignment; identify nystagmus 1. Accurately measure alignment with prisms; detect less obvious misalignment; distinguish phoria and tropia, perform forced ductions 1. Detect or verify subtle motility abnormalities; classify common nystagmus patterns 1. Recognize and classify complex eye movement abnormalities at subspecialty level
                                                                                                            
Comments:           

Assessment Tools:  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)

PC-2D Pupils

COECSA CA4

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1. Describe components of pupil testing, including test for relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) 1. Accurately grade pupil size and reactivity; detect obvious asymmetry and RAPD 1. Detect less obvious abnormalities (e.g., mild RAPD, efferent defect, sympathetic denervation); perform and interpret pharmacologic testing 1. Detect or verify subtle abnormalities (e.g., light-near dissociation); search for associated neurologic findings; (e.g., lid or motility abnormalities) 1. Recognize and classify pupillary abnormalities at subspecialty level
                                                                                                                                                          
Comments:           

Assessment Tools:  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)

PC-2E Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy

COECSA CA7

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1. Describe components of slit lamp exam; identify corneal abrasion 1. Identify anterior segment structures; recognize common corneal and conjunctival abnormalities, iritis 1. Recognize less obvious abnormalities (e.g., corneal edema, endothelial loss, dysplasia) 1. Detect or verify subtle abnormalities (e.g., corneal thinning); search for associated findings (e.g., orbital signs) 1. Recognize and classify anterior segment abnormalities at subspecialty level
                                                                                                                    
Comments:           

Assessment Tools:  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)

PC-2F Gonioscopy
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1. Describe purpose of gonioscopy 1.  Describe principles and indications, and properly perform basic techniques of gonioscopy


2.  Recognize normal angle structure; identify angle closure

1. Grade more questionable angles using compression and lens tilting; identify more subtle features (e.g., neovascularization, recession, synechiae) 1. Perform in technically difficult examinations; detect or verify subtle abnormalities (e.g., pigmentation, plateau iris) 1. Recognize and classify gonioscopic abnormalities at subspecialty level
                                                                                                              
Comments:           

Assessment Tools:  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)

PC-2G Tonometry

COECSA CA6

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1. Describe applanation technique of measuring intraocular pressure 1. Accurately measure intraocular pressure in routine patients using applanation 1. Combine or modify techniques in patients with abnormal corneas or limited cooperation (e.g., Tono-Pen, average Goldmann readings 90 degrees apart) 1. Develop advanced techniques for measuring intraocular pressure in unusual circumstances
                                                                                                              
Comments:           

Assessment Tools:  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)

PC-2H Ophthalmoscopy (Direct and Indirect)

COECSA CA8

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1.  Identify optic nerve using direct ophthalmoscopy


2.  Estimate optic nerve cup-disc ratio

1.  Perform slit lamp indirect ophthalmoscopy


2.  Recognize normal optic nerve and retinal appearance; detect obvious abnormalities (e.g., optic atrophy, papilledema, retinal detachment)

1.  Perform slit lamp ophthalmoscopy with the Hruby, +78, +90 lenses, 3- mirror contact lens, and trans-equator (pan- funduscopic) contact lens

2.  Detect less obvious abnormalities (e.g., early glaucomatous excavation, macular degeneration, large retinal tear)

3.  Perform indirect ophthalmoscopy and peripheral retinal examination

1. Detect or verify subtle abnormalities and unusual presentations (e.g., mild maculopathy, shallow detachment, subtle tear); perform scleral depression 1. Recognize and classify complex optic disc and retino-vitreous abnormalities at subspecialty level
                                                                                                                  
Comments:          

Assessment Tools:  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)

PC-3 Diagnostic Procedures & Instruments

COECSA BCS10, PI7

Has not

Achieved

Level 1

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1. Describes role of office   diagnostic procedures in diagnosis of ophthalmic disease


1. Selects and/or performs appropriate routine diagnostic tests and imaging procedures based on patient’s ocular complaints and medical condition 1. Interprets routine findings.  Recognize indications for advanced diagnostic tests and imaging procedures 1.  Interprets unusual findings, identify artifacts. Employ routine and advanced diagnostic tests and imaging procedures according to evidence based medicine 1.  Selects diagnostic procedures in a cost-effective manner


Comments:           

Assessment Tools:  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)

PC-3A Perimetry

COECSA PI10

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1. Describe role of perimetric tests to quantify and categorize visual loss in damage of the visual pathway 1. Describe fundamentals of perimetry, including kinetic and static techniques; interpret perimetry in routine optic nerve and central nervous system (CNS) disorders 1. Interpret perimetry in more complex optic nerve disorders, including glaucoma, and CNS disorders, including homonymous and bitemporal defects 1. Interpret complex perimetric results, including change over time, using statistical algorithms; identify artifacts 1. Recognize and classify complex perimetric abnormalities at subspecialty level
             
Comments:           

Assessment Tools:  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)

PC-3B Corneal Pachymetry and Topography

COECSA PI2

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1. Describe purpose of corneal pachymetry and topography 1. Describe indications for pachymetry and tomography; interpret basic abnormalities (e.g., irregular astigmatism, corneal thinning) 1. Perform and interpret corneal topographic and pachymetric measurements, and apply these to refraction, contact lens fitting, glaucoma management 1. Perform and interpret advanced corneal topographic and pachymetric measurements, and apply these to refractive surgery 1. Recognize and classify complex pachymetry and topography abnormalities at subspecialty level
Comments:           

Assessment Tools:  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)

PC-3C Ultrasonography & Biometry

COECSA PI3, PI9, PS13

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1. Describe role of ultrasonography for diagnosis when ocular media not clear 1. Describe principles of, indications for, and techniques of ocular A- and B-scan ultrasonography 1. Perform A- and B-scan and interpret basic findings (e.g., retinal and choroidal detachment, axial length) 1. Utilize A-scan data to calculate intraocular lens (IOL) power; interpret complex A- and B-scan ultrasonography (e.g., choroidal melanoma) 1. Recognize and classify complex ultrasonographic abnormalities at subspecialty level
Comments:           

Assessment Tools:  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)

PC-3D Optic Coherence Tomography (OCT)/Confocal Laser Tomography (CLT)

COECSA PI5

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1. Describe purpose of OCT and CLT 1. Describe principles of, indications for, and techniques of OCT and CLT in analyzing retina and optic disc 1. Interpret basic OCT and CLT findings (e.g., nerve fiber layer thinning, macular edema, optic disc excavation) 1. Interpret complex findings (e.g., epiretinal membranes); identify artifacts 1. Recognize and classify complex OCT and CLT abnormalities at subspecialty level
Comments:           

Assessment Tools:  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)

PC-3E Fluorescein Angiography

COECSA PI4

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1. Describe role of fluorescein angiography in diagnosis of retinal and optic nerve disease 1. Describe principles of, indications for, and techniques of fluorescein angiography in analyzing the retina and optic disc (e.g., phases of the angiogram)

2. Interpret basic fluorescein angiography in common retinal disorders (e.g., diabetic retinopathy, cystoid macular edema)

1. Interpret fluorescein angiography in less common retinal diseases 1. Interpret fluorescein angiography in complex retinal vascular and other diseases (e.g., occult and recurrent choroidal neovascular membranes) 1. Recognize and classify complex fluorescein angiographic abnormalities at subspecialty level
Comments:           

Assessment Tools:  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)

PC-3F Neuroimaging (CT and MRI)

COECSA PI6

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1. Describe basic principles of CT and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging 1. Describe indications for neuroimaging in ophthalmology; identify major MR sequences (e.g., T1, T2, FLAIR, fat suppression) 1. Recognize normal anatomy of orbits and parasellar regions 1. Identify major abnormalities (e.g., orbital and parasellar tumor, stroke, multiple sclerosis [MS] lesions) 1. Recognize and classify complex CT & MRI abnormalities at subspecialty level
Comments:          

Assessment Tools:  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD), oral/written exams, DOPS

PC-3G Ocular Lubrication Testing

COECSA PS5

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1. Describe role of office testing to identify dry eyes 1. Describe indications for and perform tests to identify dry eye syndrome and exposure keratopathy (e.g., assessment of tear film breakup time, corneal stain with fluorescein and rose bengal dyes, Schirmer test) 1. Perform diagnostic temporary punctal occlusion 1. Develop advanced techniques for quantifying ocular lubrication in unusual circumstances
Comments:           

Assessment Tools:  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD), oral/written exams, DOPS

PC-4 Disease Diagnosis

COECSA BCS6, CA12, PM9, PM10

Has not

Achieved

pre-residency

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1. Describes basic clinical features of common ophthalmologic disorders, e.g. red eye, glaucoma, cataract, diabetic retinopathy 1.  Recalls and presents clinical facts of the history and basic eye exam without higher level of synthesis and generates at least one item of the differential diagnosis for common ophthalmologic disorders




1.  Abstracts and reorganizes elicited clinical findings


2. Prioritizes potential causes of patient complaint; compares and contrasts diagnoses under consideration, considers manifestations of systemic diseases


3. Generates more focused differential diagnosis and organized final assessment

1. Organizes clinical facts in a hierarchical level of importance.   Identify discriminating features between similar patients

Incorporates most current literature findings in formulation of differential diagnosis

2. Generates focused differential and evaluation strategy to finalize diagnosis

3. Verifies diagnostic assessments of junior members of healthcare team

1 Continues to incorporate most current literature findings in formulation of differential diagnosis






Comments:           

Assessment Tools:  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD), oral/written examination

PC-5 Nonsurgical Therapy

COECSA BCS7, PM1, PM2, PM3, PM6, PS10

Has not

Achieved

pre-residency

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1.  Describes basic concepts of ophthalmic pharmacotherapy, e.g. most common topical diagnostic and therapeutic agents


2. Ability to manage medical emergencies (e.g. allergic reaction, cardio-respiratory failure, LOC),

1.  Describes categories of medications (e.g. lubricant, antibiotic, anti-inflammatory, anesthetic); describes basic pharmacology of drug therapy and broad indications/contraindications for medical therapy of common ophthalmic conditions; describes routes of drug administration (e.g. topical, oral, periocular, and intravenous) and dosing regimens




1.  Initiates therapy with medication for common ophthalmic diseases; monitor for adverse drug reactions and interactions


2.  Describes indications for oral and intravenous therapy; recognize possible racial, gender, and genomic differences in outcomes of medical therapy


3.  Demonstrates ability to use electronic prescribing (where available); demonstrate competence in periocular injections


4. Ability to use bandage contact lenses appropriately.

1.  Manages and individualizes medical therapy for more complex ophthalmic conditions


2.  Recognizes indications for alternative therapies, including surgical intervention; integrate environmental/behavioral factors


3.  Manages complications


4.  Considers non-medical factors such as cost, convenience, ability to receive medication


5.  Demonstrates competence in intravitreal injections

1. Adopts new therapies based on CME and literature review. Identifies gaps in care and process for improvement









Comments:           

           Assessment Tools:  Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD), oral/written examination/DOPS


PC-6 Minor Surgery

COECSA PM1, PM2, PM4, PM5

Has not

Achieved

pre-residency

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1.  Describes essential components of care related to non-OR surgery, e.g., informed consent, indications and contraindications for surgery, pertinent anatomy, anaesthetic and operative technique, potential intra- and postoperative complications For each procedure:

1.  Lists indications and describe relevant anatomy and pathophysiology of disorder

2.  Identifies findings that are indicators for the procedure and potential postop complications

3.  Describes anaesthetic & surgical technique, mechanism of effect, and specific instruments required

4.  Performs directed pre-op assessment; administers anesthesia and performs procedure with direct supervision; provides appropriate post-op care

1. Administers anaesthesia and perform procedure with indirect supervision

 

2.  Recognizes intra- and postoperative complications







1.  Administers anaesthesia and performs procedure with oversight supervision


2. Manages intra- and postoperative complications


3. Ability to interpret and act on results




1.  Attains individual outcome & process measures within 2 standard deviations of benchmark means








Comments:           

Assessment Tools: DOPS, OSAT


PC-6A Laser Procedures

COECSA SS13, SS14, SS15

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1. Describe uses of laser in ophthalmology 1.  Identify mode of tissue interaction, therapeutic effect, side effects, complications, safety issues

2.  Describe appropriate laser settings

3.  Use equipment effectively with correct contact lens, including peripheral retina, lens capsule

1. Perform glaucoma (e.g., iridotomy, trabeculoplasty) and retina (e.g., panretinal photocoagulation, laser retinopexy for isolated retinal breaks) procedures, Yag capsulotomy 1. Perform more complicated retinal procedures (e.g., diabetic focal/grid macula, repeat panretinal photocoagulation laser retinopexy of large or multiple breaks) 1. Perform laser procedures at subspecialty level
Comments:           

Assessment Tools: DOPS, OSAT

PC-6B Nasolacrimal Probing and Irrigation

COECSA PS6

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1. Describe purpose of nasolacrimal probing and irrigation 1. Perform basic lacrimal assessment (e.g., dye testing, punctal dilation, canalicular probing) 1. Perform basic lacrimal procedures (e.g., lacrimal drainage testing, irrigation, dye disappearance test) and lacrimal intubation 1. Perform advanced lacrimal assessment (e.g., intra- and post-operative testing, canalicular probing in trauma) 1. Perform nasolacrimal probing and irrigation in unusual circumstances at subspecialty level
Comments:           

Assessment Tools: DOPS, OSAT

PC-6C

Chalazion Excision, Excision/Biopsy Lid/Conjunctiva Lesion Tarsal plate rotation

Corneal scrape

COECSA SS10

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1. Demonstrates PC-6 Level 1 milestones for the procedures above with direct supervision 1. Demonstrates PC-6 Level 2 milestones for the procedures above with direct supervision 1. Demonstrates PC-6 Level 3 milestones for the procedures above with indirect supervision 1. Demonstrates PC-6 Level 4 milestones for the procedures above with oversight supervision 1. Demonstrates PC-6 Level 5 milestones for the procedures above with oversight supervision
Comments:           

Assessment Tools: DOPS, OSAT

PC-7 OT Surgery

COECSA PM4, PM5, PS3, PS4, SS1, SS2, SS3, COM5, COM6, COM13

Has not

Achieved

pre-residency

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1. Describes essential components of care related to OR surgery, e.g., informed consent, indications and contraindications for surgery, pertinent anatomy, anesthetic and operative technique, potential intra- and postoperative complications For each procedure:

1. Lists indications for, procedure selection, describe relevant anatomy, instrumentation for procedures, including calibration and operation of the microscope, and necessary postoperative care


2. Identifies common intra-operative and post-operative complications and perform postoperative care managing common complications


3. Prepares and drapes for extraocular & intraocular procedures (good aseptic technique)


4. Describes methods for regional and general anesthesia


5. Performs portions of selected procedures

6. Wet lab participation

1.  Obtains informed consent and perform selected procedures


2. Identifies and manages less common intraoperative and postoperative complications


3. completion of surgical wet lab curriculum, simulation if available, and assisting rotation


4. Prepares theater list considering patient needs (oversees all pre-operative planning)



1. Obtains informed consent and perform selected procedures


2. Identifies and manages uncommon intraoperative and postoperative complications








1. Attains individual outcome & process measures within 2 standard deviations of benchmark means


2. Uses results of MOC to develop individual PI plan








Comments:           

Assessment Tools: DOPS, OSATS, OSCARs, video review with rubric,

PC-7A Cataract Surgery

COECSA SS4

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1. Describe indications and technique of cataract surgery 1. Perform selected portions of cataract surgery, including wound construction and microsurgical suturing


1. Perform informed consent for cataract surgery

2. Describe MSICS/ phacoemulsification instruments and  settings and how they facilitate the procedure

3. Describe categories of IOLs, advantages, and disadvantages

4. Perform cataract surgery

5. Perform post-operative care of cataract surgery patients, identify post-operative complications

1. Perform cataract surgery proficiently, including complex technical aspects


2. Describe indications and insertion techniques for premium IOLs to correct astigmatism and provide near correction

Manage post-operative complications  

1. Perform cataract surgery at subspecialty level
Comments:     


Assessment Tools: DOPS, OSATS, OSCARs, video review with rubric,

PC-7B Strabismus Surgery

COECSA SS11

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1. Describe indications for and technique of strabismus surgery 1. Perform selected portions of strabismus surgery, including extraocular muscle suturing


2. Perform post-operative care of strabismus surgery patients

1. Obtains informed consent for strabismus surgery

2. Perform horizontal strabismus surgery recession and resection

3. Manage intra- and post- operative complications of strabismus surgery

1. Perform vertical and oblique muscle strabismus surgery


2. Describe surgical considerations for re- operations in strabismus surgery

1. Perform strabismus surgery at subspecialty level
Comments:           


Assessment Tools: DOPS, OSATS, OSCARs, video review with rubric,

PC-7C Cornea

COECSA PS7, PS8, PS9, PS11

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1. Describe indications for and technique of cornea surgery 1. Describe concepts of corneal astigmatism/ refractive error, stromal scarring, and endothelial function, and their surgical management


2. Perform corneal foreign body removal at slit lamp

1. Obtains informed consent for common corneal surgeries

2. Perform suture removal and corneal scrape at slit lamp

3. Describe techniques of corneal patch grafting, gluing, chelation of band keratopathy, conjunctival flaps, and amniotic membrane grafting

4. Perform suturing of corneal wounds (traumatic or surgical)

5. Perform pterygium surgery

1. Perform limbal relaxing incisions or arcuate keratotomy as part of cataract surgery


2. Perform post-operative care for common keratorefractive surgeries

3. Recognize and initiate management of common post-operative complications (e.g., graft rejection)

1. Perform cornea surgery at subspecialty level
Comments:           

Assessment Tools: DOPS, OSATS, OSCARs, video review with rubric


PC-7D Glaucoma

COECSA SS5

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1. Describe indications for and technique of glaucoma surgery 1.  Describe indications for glaucoma surgery


2.  Describe basic steps and goals of glaucoma surgery


3.  Identify common post- operative findings

1.  Obtains informed consent for common glaucoma surgeries (e.g., trabeculectomy, tube shunt, ciliary body ablation)


2.  Assist on and perform selected portions of selected procedures


3.  Perform post-operative evaluation, and identify post-operative complications

1.  Perform common glaucoma surgeries (e.g., trabeculectomy, tube shunt, ciliary body ablation)


2.  Perform post-operative care for uncomplicated glaucoma surgery patients


3.  Manage post-operative complications for common glaucoma surgeries

1. Perform glaucoma surgery at subspecialty level
Comments:           

Assessment Tools: DOPS, OSATS, OSCARs, video review with rubric


PC-7E Oculoplastic/Orbit

COECSA SS6, SS7, SS8, SS9, SS12

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1. Describe indications for and technique of oculoplastic/orbit surgery 1.  Demonstrate basic lid and skin suturing techniques


2.  Close simple wounds not involving the eyelid margin


3.  Provide appropriate post- operative care for selected procedures

1.  Use functional symptoms and exam findings to generate a treatment plan for oculoplastic care

2.  Assess facial and eyelid trauma (including imaging studies) to develop a treatment plan

3.  Obtains informed consent for oculoplastic procedures

4.  Close complex wounds, including those involving the eyelid margin and evisceration

1.  Demonstrate and incorporate knowledge of facial anatomy into treatment plan

2.  Weigh alternative treatment options and describe risks and benefits of each

3.  Perform basic oculoplastics procedures (e.g., tarsal strip, blepharoplasty, ptosis repair, closure of complex wounds, canthotomy, cantholysis, enucleation)

4.  Perform simple flaps and grafts

1. Perform oculoplastic/orbit surgery at subspecialty level including exenteration
Comments:           


Assessment Tools: DOPS, OSATS, OSCARs, video review with rubric,

PC-7F Retino-vitreous

COECSA SS16

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1. Describe indications for and technique of retinovitreous surgery 1. Describe indications for and associated risks of intra- vitreal injections 1.  Perform intra-vitreal injections & taps

2.  Describe indications for, and techniques and complications of pars plana vitrectomy and sclera buckling surgery; assist on retinal surgery

3.  Describe indications for, and techniques and complications of radiation therapy for ocular tumors (e.g., radioactive plaque localization, external beam radiation, radiation retinopathy)

1.  Obtains informed consent for vitreoretinal surgery


2.  Perform parts of a scleral buckling surgery and/or pars plana vitrectomy for retinal detachments

1. Perform retinovitreous surgery at subspecialty level
Comments:           


Assessment Tools: DOPS, OSATS, OSCARs, video review with rubric,


PC-7G Globe Trauma

COECSA SS6

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1. Describe indications for and technique of globe trauma surgery 1.  Describe common setting for globe trauma and injury prevention

2.  Describe use of protective eye shield in potential globe rupture

3.  Perform examination under anesthesia for suspected globe rupture

4.  Prepare patient with suspected rupture for surgery

4.  Describe surgical steps to identify globe rupture

5.  Describe techniques and sutures for repair of ruptured globe

1.  Obtains informed consent for ruptured globe repair


2.  Perform closure of corneal or scleral wounds


3.  Manage ruptured globes post-operatively, including complications

1. Perform repair of complicated corneal and scleral wounds 1. Perform globe trauma surgery at subspecialty level
Comments:           

Assessment Tools: DOPS, OSATS, OSCARs, video review with rubric,

PC-8 Consultation

COECSA BP6, BP7, BP16, BP27, ML3

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 1
1.  Describes the role of ophthalmology consultation in systemic disease 1.  Provides specific, responsive ophthalmologic consultation to other medical specialties


2.  Recognizes urgent versus non-urgent ophthalmic consultation and seeks help when needed.


3. Examines inpatient at bedside, including visual acuity and field, portable slit lamp exam (+  fluorescein stain), IOP measurement, ophthalmoscopy


4.  Communicates findings (written and oral) to consulting service

1.  Recognizes ophthalmic emergencies and immediate, necessary interventions


2.  Provides appropriate differential diagnosis and initiate nonsurgical treatment plan


3.  Orders ancillary testing; request ophthalmic subspecialty involvement when indicated


4.  Maintains continuing communication with other  involved medical specialists

1.  Identifies consultations requiring surgical intervention, including procedural options and timing


2.  Interprets ancillary tests, formulate and initiate treatment plan independently


3. Coordinates treatment plan with multiple specialties



1.  Provides ophthalmic subspecialty consultation when indicated






Comments:           

Assessment Tools: Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD), oral/written exams

PC-9 Community Eye Health: Screening, Eye Injuries, Immunizations, Health Promotion

COECSA CEH1, CEH2, CEH5, CEH6

Has not

Achieved

pre-residency

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1 understand general principles of screening and immunization 1. understand basic principles of the public health aspect of eye care. 


2. describe local eye-care screening and management programs


3. understand global initiatives that effect eye care (e.g. Vision 2020).

1. participate in community screening and refer when appropriate


2 educate community about relevant diseases including eye injuries, immunizations and vitamin deficiencies


 

1. Apply basic principles of the public health aspect of eye care. 


2. Understand how to assess burden of eye disease and define context specific strategies for control

1. organize/conduct new screening programs and surveys


2. advocate for occupational eye safety plans


3 develop eye-care health promotion action plan

Comments:           

Assessment tools: written or oral tests, faculty evaluation

MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE

Residents must demonstrate knowledge of established and evolving basic science, clinical, epidemiological and social-behavioral sciences, as well as the application of this knowledge to patient care. Residents must demonstrate level-appropriate knowledge in the following core domains: anatomy, physiology, biochemistry, molecular and cell biology, genetics, General Medicine; Fundamentals & Principles of Ophthalmology; Optics & Refraction; Ophthalmic Pathology & Intraocular Tumors; Neuro-Ophthalmology; Paediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus; Orbit, Eyelids, & Lacrimal System; Cornea, External Disease, & Anterior Segment Trauma; Lens & Cataract; Refractive Management & Intervention; Intraocular Inflammation & Uveitis; Glaucoma; Retina/Vitreous

MK-1 Demonstrate level-appropriate knowledge

COECSA BCS 1-5

Has not

Achieved

pre-residency

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1.  Has successfully completed internship after basic medical degree graduation 1. successfully passes exams of medical knowledge as required to progress through program 1. successfully passes exams of medical knowledge as required to progress through program 1. successfully passes exams of medical knowledge as required to progress through program   1. Achieves COECSA Fellowship certification.
Comments:           

Assessment Tools:  Viva, written exams (semester/annual), ICO Exams, COECSA Fellowship exam


MK-2 Demonstrate level-appropriate knowledge applied to patient management

COECSA BCS8, BCS12

Has not

Achieved

pre-residency

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1. Demonstrates level-appropriate knowledge for patient management on ophthalmology rotation 1.   Demonstrates level-appropriate knowledge for patient management for level 1.   Demonstrates level-appropriate knowledge for patient management for level 1.  Demonstrates level-appropriate knowledge for patient management on for level 1. Participates in CPD according to country requirements
Comments:           

Assessment Tools:  Observed patient encounter (OCEX CCRS), Viva preferred over written, Case-Based Discussion evaluation 


MK-3 Equipment Maintenance

COECSA CEH4

Has not

Achieved

pre-residency

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5


Appreciate cost and delicate nature of ophthalmic equipment

1 Able to describe parts and function of diagnostic equipment/lenses and their basic maintenance


2.Use appropriately for their level


Level appropriate use and maintenance of diagnostic equipment/lenses


1 Able to describe and teach proper diagnostic equipment use and maintenance  

Works within the system to obtain most cost-efficient equipment


Comments:           

Assessment tools: faculty evaluation, written/oral test

PROFESSIONALISM

Residents must demonstrate a commitment to carrying out professional responsibilities and an adherence to ethical principles.  Residents are expected to demonstrate:

PROF-1: Compassion, integrity, and respect for others; sensitivity and responsiveness to diverse patient populations

COECSA BP18

Has not

Achieved

pre-residency

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1.  Recognizes and never participates in:

verbal or physical abuse to patients, peers, staff, or supervisors; sexual harassment


2.  Recognizes and never participates in:

discrimination based on gender, age, culture, race, religion, disability, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status

1.  Consistently demonstrates behaviour that conveys caring, honesty, and genuine interest in patients and families

2. Demonstrates compassion, integrity, respect, sensitivity, and responsiveness

3.  Exhibits these attitudes consistently in common and uncomplicated situations

4.  Usually recognizes cultural and socioeconomic issues in patient care 

1. Exhibits these attitudes in complex and complicated situations


2.  Almost always recognizes cultural and socioeconomic issues in patient care


3. Adheres to ethical principles


1. Exhibits these attitudes consistently in all relationships and situations


2.  Consistently recognizes cultural and socioeconomic issues in patient care


1. Role models behavior demonstrating compassion and respect for others, cultural and socioeconomic issues in patient care


2. Mentors junior members of health care teams


3. Develops organizational policies and education to support the application of these principles

Comments:           

             Assessment Tools: 360 degree/multisource feedback, OSCE


PROF 2: Responsiveness to patient needs that supersedes self-interest

COECSA BP18, BP24, BP30

Has not

Achieved

pre-residency

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1. Recognizes and never participates in:

refusal to perform assigned tasks, answer pages or calls; avoidance of scheduled call duty

1. Almost always completes patient care tasks promptly and completely; punctual; appropriately groomed

2.  Manages fatigue, sleep deprivation and personal health issues.

3.  Identifies impact of personal beliefs and values on practice of medicine

1.  Consistently completes patient care tasks promptly and completely; punctual; appropriately groomed


2.  Manages personal beliefs and values to avoid negative impact on patient care

1. Monitors fatigue, sleep deprivation and personal health in junior members of health care team


2. Mentors junior members of the healthcare team to manage barriers to effective patient care 

1.  Role models behavior demonstrating compassion and respect for others


2.  Develops organizational policies and education to support the application of these principles

Comments:           

Assessment Tools 360 degree/multisource feedback


PROF-3: Respect for patient privacy and autonomy

COECSA BP14, BP18, BP21

Has not

Achieved

pre-residency

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1. Conforms to national patient rights regulations

2. Recognizes and never participates in:

unauthorized examination of patient records

disclosure of protected health information to unauthorized personnel

1. Almost always: recognizes and implements required procedures for patient involvement in human research; inform patients of rights; involve patients in medical decision-making 1. Consistently recognizes and implements required procedures for patient involvement in human research; informs patients of rights; involves patients in medical decision-making

2. Mentors junior members of the healthcare team regarding protection of patient privacy

1.  Role models behavior regarding protection of patient privacy

2.  Mentors residents involved in administration of research projects involving humans

3.  Develops organizational policies and education to support the application of these principles

Comments:           

            Assessment Tools: 360 degree/multisource

 


PROF-4: Accountability to patients, society and the profession

COECSA BP4, BP8, BP9, BP17, BP18, BP19, BP20, BP22, BP23

Has not

Achieved

pre-residency

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1. Recognizes and never participates in:

deception regarding level of training and experience, medical errors; demeaning other practitioners


2. Recognizes and never participates in:

plagiarism, falsification of records, misrepresentation of training, unexplained absences


3. Adheres to national legal requirements for medical practice


4. Aware of local guidelines and legislature impacting eye care (e.g. use of human tissue, child care protection)

1. Usually recognizes simple conflict of interest scenarios


2. Almost always completes medical record-keeping, reporting and critical incident tasks promptly and completely


3. Maintains up-to-date portfolio/training log-book


4. Always identifies self to patients as resident



1.  Almost always recognizes and takes appropriate steps to manage simple conflict of interest scenarios


2. Consistently completes medical record-keeping, reporting and critical incident tasks promptly and completely


3. Maintains up-to-date portfolio/training log-book


4.  Almost always recognizes limitations and request help or refer patients when appropriate


5. Knows specific ophthalmic conditions requiring use of human tissue

1. Consistently recognizes and takes appropriate steps to manage more complex conflict of interest scenarios


2. Consistently acts within limitations and seek help when appropriate


3. Maintains up-to-date portfolio/training log-book



1.  Assumes leadership and mentoring role in management of more complex conflict of interest scenarios


2.  Develops organizational policies and education to support the application of these principles


Comments:           

Assessment Tools: 360 degree/multisource, oral/written exam, portfolio


INTERPERSONAL AND COMMUNICATION SKILLS

Residents must demonstrate interpersonal and communication skills that result in the effective exchange of information and collaboration with patients, their families, and health professionals. Residents are expected to:  

ICS-1: Communicate effectively with patients and families with diverse socioeconomic and cultural backgrounds. 

1. Rapport development      3.  Counsel and educate

2. Interview skills                   4.  Conflict management

COECSA COM1, COM3, COM4, COM7, COM10, COM11, COM12, BP 10, BP11, BP12, BP13

Has not

Achieved Level 1

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1.  Develops positive relationship with patients in uncomplicated situations based on mutual trust; demonstrate empathy

2.  Describes factors that affect communication (e.g. modality, language, use of interpreters, other family in the room, hearing, vision, and cognitive impairments, body language)

3.  Engages in active listening, teach-back and other strategies to ensure patient understanding.

4.  Recognizes ethical and relational communication conflicts

1. Develops positive relationships with families and team members

2.  Identifies special communication needs of vulnerable populations

3.  Counsels patients compassionately at appropriate level for comprehension regarding disease: causes & mechanisms; risk factors; prognosis; management options; risks & benefits

4.  Engages patient in shared decision-making, based on the patient’s understanding and ability to carry out the proposed plan

5.  Negotiates and manages simple patient/family-related conflicts

1.  Develops working relationships in complex situations across specialties and systems of care

2.  Effectively communicates with vulnerable populations, both patients at risk and their families, orally and in writing

3.  Actively seeks information from multiple sources, including consultations.

4.  Organizes family/patient/team member conferences and facilitate/lead them.

5.  Counsels patients regarding emotionally difficult information such as blindness; use appropriate technique for "breaking bad news"

6.  Negotiates and manages conflict in complex 

1.  Sustains working relationships during complex and challenging situations including transitions of care and breaking bad news.

2.  Coordinates care for vulnerable populations across health care and social/governmental systems using both oral and written communication

3.  Demonstrates effective integration of all available sources of information when gathering patient-related data

4.   Counsels patients regarding potential short and long term impact of complex, higher risk disease and intervention; address special needs; direct to resources

5.  Documents results of communications, patient preferences, conflict resolution, advance directives

1.  Sustains relationships across systems of care and with patients during long-term follow-up


2. Advocates for vulnerable populations to improve care provided through healthcare, social/community and governmental systems


3. Counsels patients regarding unusual or experimental therapies, including clinical trial participation when indicated


4. Mentors junior members of the health care team  to improve communication skills


Comments:           

Assessment Tools: 360 degree/msf, OCEX, OSCE, chart review


ICS-2: Communicate effectively with physicians, other health professionals, and health related agencies

1. Comprehensive, timely, and legible medical records

2. Consultation requests

3. Care transition (Patient hand-over)

4. Conflict management (workplace)

COECSA PM8, CEH3

Has not

Achieved

Level 1

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1. Produces comprehensive, timely, and legible non-ophthalmic medical records


2. Describes effects of computer use on accuracy of information gathering and recording, and potential disruption of the physician patient relationship


3. Describes effect of poor communication on the risk of medical error.


4. Describes importance and procedure for request of consultation.


5.  Lists steps for appropriate care transition


6.  Manages one-on-one conflicts

1. Produces comprehensive, timely, and legible ophthalmic medical records


2.  Ensures that the written record (e.g. EMR, PHR/patient portal, hand-offs, discharge summaries) are accurate and complete, with attention to preventing confusion and error.


3. Recognizes need for consultation; requests appropriate consultant with assistance


4. Performs appropriate basic ophthalmology care transition


5. Manages conflicts within peer group

1.  Maintains face-to-face patient communication while using EMR


2.  Recognizes need, identifies and requests appropriate consultant


3. Performs more complex subspecialty care transitions; ensures accurate documentation and face-to-face communication where needed


4.  Manages conflicts within department


1.  Effectively and ethically uses all forms of communication including face-to-face, telephone, electronic, and social media.


2. Coordinates multiple consultants


3. Manages complex multisystem care transitions


4. Manages conflicts with superiors and payers


1.  Develops models/approaches to managing difficult communications







Comments:           

Assessment Tools: 360 degree/msf, OCEX, OSCE, chart review


ICS-3: Work effectively as a member or leader of a healthcare team or other professional group

1.  Clinical team (outpatient clinic, inpatient consult service)

2.  Operating room team

3.  Professional workgroup, e.g. QI committee

COECSA ML7

Has not

Achieved

Level 1

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1. Defines team purpose 1.  Describes role and responsibility of each team member


2. Prepares for team role and fulfil assignments


3. Follows institutional policies


1. Implements team activities as directed by team leader


2. Identifies individual vs. group collaborative roles



1. Selects, evaluates, provides feedback, and remediates team members


   2. Identifies team goals


3. Provides team assignments to achieve team goals


    4. Designs and implements plan for team improvement

1.  Develops institutional and organizational strategies to improve team functions, trains physicians and educators
Comments:           

Assessment Tools: 360 degree/msf, portfolio


ICS-4: Effectively present didactic and case-based educational material to physicians and other healthcare professionals

COECSA ML6

Has not

Achieved

Level 1

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1.  Organizes clear and accurate non-ophthalmic case presentation with level-appropriate diagnostic and management recommendations 1. Organizes case presentation for basic ophthalmic conditions, with diagnostic and management recommendations


2. Presents focused literature review

1. Organizes case presentation for more complex ophthalmic conditions, with diagnostic and management recommendations


2.  Presents comprehensive literature review

1.  Schedules, organizes, and implements case-based and didactic conference program


2.  Mentors presentations


1.  Provides leadership for conference implementation



Comments:           

Assessment Tools: 360 degree/msf, portfolio, faculty evaluation

PRACTICE-BASED LEARNING AND IMPROVEMENT

Residents must demonstrate the ability to investigate and evaluate their care of patients, to appraise and assimilate scientific evidence, and to continuously improve patient care based on constant self-evaluation and life-long learning. Residents are expected to develop skills and habits to be able to meet the following goals:

PBLI-1: Self-Directed Learning

1.  Identify strengths, deficiencies, and limits in one’s knowledge and expertise.

2.  Set learning and improvement goals.

3.  Identify and perform appropriate learning activities.

4.  Use information technology to optimize learning.

COECSA BP1, BP2, BP3, BP5, BP15, BP15, BP25, BP26, BP28

Has not

Achieved

Level 1

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1.  Identifies gaps in personal knowledge and expertise

2.  Demonstrates computer literacy and basic computer skills in clinical practice

1.  Assesses performance by self-reflection and review of   feedback and evaluations

2. Develops a learning plan, based on feedback, with supervision

3.  Utilizes review articles or practice guidelines to answer specific questions in clinical practice

1. Develops learning plan independently with supervision, with accurate assessment of competence and areas for continued improvement

2. Utilizes appropriate evidence-based information tool to answer specific questions while providing care

1.  Utilizes self-directed learning with little external guidance

2.  Consistently uses evidence-based information tools to answer specific questions

3.  Utilizes system or process for keeping up with relevant changes in medicine

1.  Maintains knowledge and regular review of best evidence supporting common practices and acknowledges strengths and deficiencies

2.  Participates in CPD requirements

48 months

Comments:           

Assessment Tools: portfolio, faculty evaluation



PBLI-2: Locate, appraise, and assimilate evidence from scientific studies related to their patients’ health problems.

COECSA BCS9, BCS11, PM1, PM2, BP1, BP2, BP3, ML5, ML8, ML9,  ML10, ML12

Has not

Achieved

Level 1

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1.  Describes basic concepts in clinical epidemiology, biostatistics, and clinical reasoning


2.  Categorizes study design of a research study

1.  Ranks study designs by validity, generalizability to larger populations, and identifies critical threats to study validity

2.  Distinguishes relevant research outcomes from other types of evidence

3.  Formulates a searchable question from a clinical question and use IT to investigate it

4. Participate in clinical audit

1.  Applies a set of critical appraisal criteria to different types of research, including synopses of original research findings, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and clinical practice guidelines

2.  Critically evaluates information from others: colleagues, experts, pharmaceutical representatives, and patient-delivered information

3. Conduct & interpret clinical audit

1.  Demonstrates a clinical practice that incorporates principles and basic practices of evidence-based practice and information mastery

2. Conduct, interpret and manage junior residents in clinical audit

1.  Independently teaches and assesses evidence-based medicine and information mastery techniques

2.  Cites evidence supporting several commonly used techniques in own practice

Comments:           

Assessment Tools: faculty evaluation, portfolio

PBLI-3 Research Projects/ Dissertation*

·         The COECSA Curriculum does not require a dissertation or research project. This milestone only applies to programs that require a dissertation or publication of research

Has not

Achieved

Level 1

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1 Be aware that a dissertation or research project is required 1.  Learn about research methods

2. Identify dissertation/ research topic

1. Dissertation/Research  proposal completed & approved by deadline set by program

2. Data collection has started

1. Completed Data collection

2. Completed & submitted dissertation/ research paper

3. Published at least 1 article

4. Presented research in a conference

1.  Continue publishing

4. Presented research in an international  conference

Comments:           

Assessment: Supervisor Review, Dissertation Grade

SYSTEMS-BASED PRACTICE

Residents must demonstrate an awareness of and responsiveness to the larger context and system of health care, as well as the ability to call effectively on other resources in the system to provide optimal health care. Residents are expected to:

SBP-1: Work effectively and coordinate patient care in various health care delivery systems

COECSA BP6, ML1

Has not

Achieved

Level 1

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1.  Describes basic levels of systems of care (self-management to societal) 1. Describes systems of care within residency training program

2. Lists potential impediments to safe and efficient handovers of care within and between systems

1.  Identifies impediments to safe and efficient referrals within and between systems

2.  Manages routine handovers safely

1.  Proposes solutions to impediments to safe and efficient transitions of care within and between systems

2.  Manages complex handovers of care within and between systems

1.  Leads systems change at micro and macro level


Comments:           

Assessment Tools: faculty evaluation, 360 degree/msf 

SBP-2: Incorporate cost-effectiveness, risk/benefit analysis, and IT to promote safe and effective patient care

COECSA ML11

Has not

Achieved

Level 1

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1.  Describes scenarios in which physician may affect cost-effectiveness in patient care


2.  Explains the role of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) in prevention of medical errors

1.  Describes cost-effectiveness in patient care

2.  Aware of cost options for most frequently ordered tests and medications

3.  Utilizes where available the Electronic Health Record (EHR) to order tests and medications, document notes; 3.  Demonstrate medication reconciliation for patients

4. Uses information systems for patient care

1.  Almost always practices cost-effective care




1.  Consistently practices cost-effective care


2.  Applies risk-benefit analyses in ophthalmic care


3.  Contributes to reduction of risks of automation and computerized systems by reporting system problems

1.  Advocates for cost-effective care and use of risk-benefit analyses within health care system


2.  Recommends systems re-design for faulty computerized processes

Comments:           

Assessment Tools: faculty evaluation


SBP-3: Work in inter-professional teams to enhance patient safety, identify system errors and implement solutions

COECSA ML2, ML4,

Has not

Achieved

Level 1

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1.  Describes epidemiology of medical errors and differences between medical errors, near misses, and sentinel events

2.  Describes role of teamwork and communication failure in healthcare as a leading cause of preventable patient harm

1.  Reports problematic processes including errors and near misses to supervisor

2.  Describes use of checklists and briefings to prevent adverse events in healthcare

1.  Analyses causes of adverse events through root cause analysis (RCA)

2.  Applies checklist-guided briefings in healthcare activities

3. Can function as the leader of the team when called upon.

1.  Develops content for and facilitate patient safety M&M presentation or conference focusing on systems-based errors in patient care

2.  Analyses shared team experience (e.g. procedure) with debriefing to solve problems

3. Can function as the leader of the team when called upon.

1.  Designs checklists for use in healthcare

2.  Creates curriculum to teach teamwork and communication skills to healthcare professionals

Comments:           

Assessment Tools: faculty evaluation

WORKPLACE BASED ASSESSMENTS

Clinical Rating Scale
CRS Learning Outcome Target Year (TYA)# Assessor*
CRS1 CA1 Consultation 1 annual review Cons
CRS2 CA2 Vision 1 Cons/AHP
CRS3 CA3 Fields 1 Cons
CRS4 CA4 External eye 1 Cons
CRS5 CA5 Pupil 1 Cons
CRS6 CA6 Ocular motility 2 Cons
CRS7 CA7 IOP 1 Cons/AHP
CRS8 CA8 Slit lamp 1 Cons
CRS9a, CRS9b

CRS9c,  CRS9d

CA9 Fundus 2 Cons
CRSret PS2 Retinoscopy (Paed) 3 Cons/Optometrist

* Assessors:

  • Cons: consultant ophthalmologist
  • AHP: appropriately trained allied health professional (nurse, orthoptist, optometrist)
Clinical Rating Scale CRS1 (Outcome CA1: CLINICAL HISTORY)

COECSA Workplace Based Assessments

Clinical Rating Scale CRS1      (Outcome CA1-Clinical History)

All trainees must be able to take a clinical history from a patient, which is appropriate for the clinical problem and the individual patient’s needs.


Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                                       Date (dd/mm/yyyy)          

YEAR 1                                       YEAR 2                           YEAR 3                    YEAR 4          Other (specify)

Assessor's name                                                                                          Type of assessment:  Formative        Summative                                                              


Assessor's status           Consultant                       Senior Trainee              Other (Specify)

Brief description of case                                       

Please grade the following areas using the scale below (use tick or cross)

Attitude and manner
V good trainees introduce themselves and establish the name of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer). Their demeanour throughout the interview shows that they are actively listening to the patient by gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They establish a good rapport with the patient which is respectful of any ethnic, religious or social preferences that they express. They are empathic and sensitive to the patient’s concerns.

Poor trainees neither introduce themselves nor identify the patient.  They hurry the patient and ignore what the patient is saying.  They look away or appear impatient during the history taking. There are unable to establish rapport with the patient and show  little respect.

Poor Fair Good V Good n/a
Introduction and start of interview
Rapport with patient and development of trust
Listening skills, appropriate eye contact and non-verbal communication
Empathy and sensitivity
Respect for patient
Information gathering
V good trainees capture all of the appropriate information required for the ophthalmic examination and diagnosis, the planning of investigations and subsequent management. Their questions are structured and guided by the differential diagnosis suggested by the presenting complaint.

Poor trainees ask questions by rote. They omit important areas.  They do not pursue an appropriate line of questioning informed by a differential diagnosis.

Poor Fair Good V Good n/a
History of presenting complaint
Past ophthalmic history
Family history
Past medical history/general health
Systems enquiry
Drug history and allergies
Social history
Other relevant enquiries pertinent to case
Assessment of mental state
Awareness
V good trainees are attentive the patient’s anxiety and main concerns.  They are sensitive to the social impact of the patient’s problems. They adapt the interview appropriately as determined by the patient’s age, mental state and any communication problems such as poor hearing or language barriers.

Poor trainees disregard the patient’s main concerns or anxieties and any impact their problem may have on their social circumstances. They are insensitive to the potential barriers to good communication raised by extremes of age, mental state, hearing impairment or language.

Poor Fair Good V Good n/a
Sensitive and responsive to patient anxieties and concerns
Aware of the social impact of problems for patient
Interview sensitive and responsive to age of patient, mental state and any communication problems
Management of interview
V good trainees are skilled in questioning with an appropriate mixture of open and closed questions.  They clarify what they have understood and check this with the patient by appropriate summaries. They use the time efficiently and guide the patient with sensitivity. They explain terms appropriately and finish the interview effectively, making future plans clear.

Poor trainees ask closed questions which do not encourage the patient to tell her/his story. They do not clarify points or attempt to summarise.  They waste time through repetition or inappropriate questioning. They do not guide the patient appropriately.  Information if provided at all unclear or too technical.  They do not make it clear when the interview has come to an end or what the next step is.

Poor Fair Good V Good n/a
Mode of enquiry: appropriate use of closed, open, directed and probing questions.  Clarification and summarising.
Appropriate control and direction
Efficient use of time
Delivery of information
Termination of interview
Overall performance in this assessment Poor Fair Good V Good
Summative Outcome (Delete as appropriate if tool used for summative assessments)                             Pass/Fail

Pass/Fail = Meets expectation /Does not meet expectation for stage of training

 
(Note: "Pass" requires an overall assessment grade of "Good" and NO individual "Poor" grades


Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.

              


Anything especially good?





Suggestions for development:




Agreed action:



              


Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee:

Clinical Rating Scale CRS2 (Outcome CA2: ASSESS Vision)

COECSA Workplace Based Assessments

Clinical Rating Scale CRS2 (Outcome CA2: Assess Vision)

All trainees must be able to assess visual acuity for near and distance using an appropriate method and interpret the results. They must be aware of and be able to interpret and apply newer methods of assessing visual acuity when they are introduced into clinical practice. They must be able to test colour vision using an appropriate method and interpret the results. They should also know the principles of the assessment of contrast sensitivity. They must be able to assess vision in children and in adults who have language and other barriers to communication. They must be able to assess vision in circumstances outside the OPD environment.


Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                                Date (dd/mm/yyyy)                     

YEAR 1                                YEAR 2                   YEAR 3            YEAR 4             Other (specify)

Assessor's name                                                                                             Type of assessment:  Formative           Summative                                                                

Assessor's status           Consultant                       Senior Trainee                    Other (Specify)

Brief description of case                                       


Please grade the following areas using the scale below (use tick or cross)

Attitude and manner
V good trainees introduce themselves and establish the name of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer). Their demeanour throughout shows that they are attentive to the patient by gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out.

Poor trainees neither introduce themselves nor identify the patient.  They hurry the patient and ignore what the patient is saying. They do not explain the test in an appropriate manner.

Poor Fair Good V Good n/a
Introduction and explanation of test
Rapport with patient, empathy and sensitivity to age and context
Respect for patient
Visual acuity Method*: Snellen/LogMar/Sheridan-Gardner/other, specify

(* Please circle method as appropriate or specify “other”…………………………………………….)

Very good trainees occlude each eye in turn to perform the test.  They use an appropriate form of visual acuity assessment determined by the patient’s age and level of understanding.  They can compare results from different tests.  They use appropriate refractive correction and instruct the patient on the best use of a pinhole. They record the visual acuity correctly.

Poor trainees do not occlude appropriately.  They do not use an appropriate test method.  They do not understand the equivalence of results from different tests. They do not use an appropriate method of correcting refractive error. The visual acuity is recorded inaccurately or incorrectly.

Poor Fair Good V Good n/a
Appropriate occlusion
Technique of assessment appropriate for age and context
Appropriate use of refractive correction
Appropriate use of pinhole
Accurate recording of distance acuity
Accurate recording of near acuity

COECSA Workplace Based Assessments

Clinical Rating Scale CRS2 (Outcome CA2: Assess Vision)

All trainees must be able to assess visual acuity for near and distance using an appropriate method and interpret the results. They must be aware of and be able to interpret and apply newer methods of assessing visual acuity when they are introduced into clinical practice. They must be able to test colour vision using an appropriate method and interpret the results. They should also know the principles of the assessment of contrast sensitivity. They must be able to assess vision in children and in adults who have language and other barriers to communication. They must be able to assess vision in circumstances outside the OPD environment.

Colour vision (Method: Ishihara/other pseudoisochromatic/other)
V good trainees occlude each eye in turn to perform the test.  They use an appropriate form of colour vision assessment determined by the patient’s age and level of understanding.  They can compare results from different tests. They record the results of the colour vision test correctly and know how to interpret them.

Poor trainees do not occlude appropriately.  They do not choose an appropriate test method.  They do not understand the equivalence of results from different tests.  The colour vision is recorded inaccurately or incorrectly.  They do not understand the implications of the result.

Poor Fair Good V Good n/a
Appropriate occlusion
Technique of assessment appropriate for age and context
Appropriate use of colour vision test
Accurate recording of colour vision
Overall performance in this assessment Poor Fair Good V Good
Summative Outcome (Delete as appropriate if tool used for summative assessments)                             Pass/Fail 
(Note: "Pass" requires an overall assessment grade of "Good" and NO individual "Poor" grades.) 


Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.


Anything especially good?


Suggestions for development:


Agreed action:


              

Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee:

Clinical Rating Scale CRS3 (Outcome CA3: EXTERNAL EYE EXAMINATION)

COECSA Workplace Based Assessments

Clinical Rating Scale CR3 (Outcome CA3: External Eye Examination)

All trainees must be able to perform an examination of the external eye, ocular adnexae, eyelids and orbits using appropriate equipment and illumination. They must be able to modify the examination and utilise other techniques as indicated by the clinical findings.


Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                 Date (dd/mm/yyyy)       

YEAR 1                                YEAR 2                   YEAR 3            YEAR 4             Other (specify)

Assessor's name                                                                                         Type of assessment: Formative         Summative                                                              

Assessor's status           Consultant                       Senior Trainee                   Other (Specify)

Brief description of case                                       


Please grade the following areas using the scale below (use tick or cross)

Attitude and manner
V good trainees introduce themselves and establish the name of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer). Their demeanour throughout shows that they are attentive to the patient by gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They clearly explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out.

Poor trainees fail to introduce themselves and do not identify the patient.  They appear to hurry or ignore what the patient is saying. They do not explain the test in an appropriate manner.

Poor Fair Good V Good n/a
Introduction and explanation of examination
Rapport with patient, empathy and sensitivity to age and context
Respect for patient
External eye examination
V good trainees carry out a thorough inspection of the patient and this efficiently guides the examination. They examine the patient’s face, lymph nodes and neck and observe, palpate and auscultate the orbit as indicated.  They examine the lacrimal gland, sac, canaliculi and puncta. They examine static and dynamic lid position and make accurate and surgically relevant measurements (e.g. Bells, corneal sensation).  They identify any abnormalities of the lashes and meibomian glands. They examine the bulbar, tarsal and forniceal conjunctiva and the cornea, in particular identifying abnormalities thereof secondary to lid abnormalities.

Poor trainees examine the external eye in an ill-structured and inefficient way and without adequate illumination. They restrict their examination to the eyelids, even when the clinical condition suggests an examination of wider facial or ocular structures. They are unable to assess lid position accurately. They fail to examine all of the conjunctiva and the lacrimal system, or the cornea. They do not assess the orbital margin.  They fail to recognise important abnormalities of the external eye.

Poor Fair Good V Good n/a
Assessment of face/head
Palpation of orbital margins
Examination of lacrimal system
Assessment of lid position with appropriate measurements
Examination of lashes
Examination of meibomian glands
Examination of conjunctiva
Examination of cornea


COECSA Workplace Based Assessments

Clinical Rating Scale CR3 (Outcome CA3: External Eye Examination)

All trainees must be able to perform an examination of the external eye, ocular adnexae, eyelids and orbits using appropriate equipment and illumination. They must be able to modify the examination and utilise other techniques as indicated by the clinical findings.

Use of ancillary tests
V good trainees use these techniques skilfully and without prompting.  They recognise the limits of normality and correctly interpret their findings.

Poor trainees require prompting to use these techniques.  They have a poor method and fail to recognise normal and abnormal findings.

Poor Fair Good V Good n/a
Lid eversion
Exophthalmometer
Other (please specify)
Overall performance in this assessment Poor Fair Good V Good
 
Summative Outcome (Delete as appropriate if tool used for summative assessments)                             Pass/Fail
 
(Note: "Pass" requires an overall assessment grade of "Good" and NO individual "Poor" grades.)


Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.

              


Anything especially good?


Suggestions for development:




Agreed action:


              


Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee:

Clinical Rating Scale CR4 (Outcome CA4: EXAMINATION OF PUPILS)

COECSA Workplace Based Assessments

Clinical Rating Scale CR4 (Outcome CA4: Examination of Pupils)

All trainees must be able to assess the pupil for abnormalities of shape, size and reactions and interpret their findings.  They must also be able to perform and interpret appropriate pharmacological tests for specific pupil abnormalities.

                                              

Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                          Date (dd/mm/yyyy)                 

YEAR 1                                YEAR 2                   YEAR 3            YEAR 4             Other (specify)

Assessor's name                                                                                         Type of assessment: Formative          Summative                                                              

Assessor's status           Consultant                       Senior Trainee                    Other (Specify)

Brief description of case:


Please grade the following areas using the scale below (use tick or cross)

Attitude and manner
V good trainees introduce themselves and establish the name of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer). Their demeanour throughout shows that they are attentive to the patient by gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They clearly explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out.

Poor trainees fail to introduce themselves and do not identify the patient.  They appear to hurry or ignore what the patient is saying. They do not explain the test in an appropriate manner.

Poor Fair Good V Good n/a
Introduction and explanation of examination
Rapport with patient, empathy and sensitivity to age and context
Respect for patient
Examination of the pupils

V good trainees examine the patient in low ambient light and record the pupil size, position, shape and symmetry. They ensure that the subject fixates on a distance target.  They use a bright focussed light to examine the direct and the consensual reaction in each eye, noting the extent, speed and recovery of the reaction.  They then progress to the swinging flashlight test (SFT), dwelling on each eye for a second or two and moving the light swiftly across to the other pupil.  They correctly interpret the results of a SFT even when one pupil is dilated or obscured.  They test the accommodative reaction using an appropriate target and instruction.  They ask to view the pupils on the slit lamp.  They are familiar with pharmacological tests for abnormal pupil reactions. They suggest an appropriate cause for any abnormalities observed. 

Poor trainees examine the pupils in an ill-structured and inefficient way with inappropriate illumination.  They fail to ensure that the subject fixates on a distance target and get in the way of the subject’s direction of gaze. They allow the test light to spill into the non-tested eye.  They forget to record the size, shape and position of the pupils.  They perform the SFT with a slow arc under the nose from one eye to the other.  They are unable to comment on pupil reactions if one pupil is dilated or obscured.  They elicit the accommodative reaction by rapidly approaching the eyes with one finger and are unaware of the threat response.  They exhibit confusion about the theory and practice of pharmacological tests. They forget to view the pupils on the slit lamp. They are unable to interpret the results of the test.

Poor Fair Good V Good n/a
General inspection in ambient light with measurements
Appropriate use of distance target
Direct pupillary reaction and recovery
Consensual reaction and recovery
Swinging flashlight test
Accommodative reaction and recovery
Slit lamp examination
Correct reactions identified
Suggestion of suitable aetiology
Suggestions for suitable further tests

COECSA Workplace Based Assessments

Clinical Rating Scale CR4 (Outcome CA4: Examination of Pupils)

All trainees must be able to assess the pupil for abnormalities of shape, size and reactions and interpret their findings.  They must also be able to perform and interpret appropriate pharmacological tests for specific pupil abnormalities

Overall performance in this assessment Poor Fair Good V Good
 
Summative Outcome (Delete as appropriate if tool used for summative assessments)                             Pass/Fail
 
(Note: "Pass" requires an overall assessment grade of "Good" and NO individual "Poor" grades.)
 


Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.

              


Anything especially good?


Suggestions for development:




Agreed action:


              


Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee:

Clinical Rating Scale CRS5 (Outcome CA5: OculaR MOTILITY)

                                              

COECSA Workplace Based Assessments

Clinical Rating Scale CRS5 (Outcome CA5: Cover Test and Ocular Motility)

All trainees must be able to perform a cover test, assess ocular movements and interpret the findings. They must be able perform a prism cover test.  They must also be able to recognise and describe nystagmus if present.


Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                               Date (dd/mm/yyyy)                 

YEAR 1                                YEAR 2                   YEAR 3            YEAR 4             Other (specify)

Assessor's name                                                                                         Type of assessment:  Formative        Summative                                                              

Assessor's status           Consultant                       Senior Trainee                     Other (Specify)

Brief description of case                                       


Please grade the following areas using the scale below (use tick or cross)

Attitude and manner
V good trainees introduce themselves and establish the name of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer). Their demeanour throughout shows that they are attentive to the patient by gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They clearly explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out.

Poor trainees fail to introduce themselves and do not identify the patient.  They appear to hurry or ignore what the patient is saying. They do not explain the test in an appropriate manner.

Poor Fair Good V Good n/a
Introduction and explanation of examination
Rapport with patient, empathy and sensitivity to age and context
Respect for patient
Cover test and eye movements
V good trainees comment on corneal reflexes and any abnormal head posture, ptosis, pupils etc. They use suitable near and distance fixation targets. They perform cover-uncover and alternate cover tests purposefully without excessive repetition and identify abnormalities accurately. Their instructions to the patient are clear and unambiguous throughout. The examination flows easily and appropriate versions, ductions, vergences and saccade checks are performed in response to findings.

Poor trainees fail to perform a general inspection of the patient. Their instructions to the patient are ambiguous and confusing so that the patient is unclear what is expected of them. They perform the tests clumsily, without an obvious plan and important steps are missed. They miss and/or fail to interpret important clinical signs.

Poor Fair Good V Good n/a
Observation of associated ocular signs and head position
Use of fixation targets
Performance of cover, cover-uncover test and alternate cover test.
Assessment of versions, ductions, vergences, saccades
Interpretation of findings

COECSA Workplace Based Assessments

Clinical Rating Scale CRS5 (Outcome CA5: Cover Test and Ocular Motility)

All trainees must be able to perform a cover test, assess ocular movements and interpret the findings. They must be able perform a prism cover test.  They must also be able to recognise and describe nystagmus if present.

Prism cover test
V good trainees give clear instructions to the patient. They perform the test at near and distance and with/without glasses or head posture if appropriate. They hold the prism bar at a comfortable and effective distance with prisms aligned in the correct position for the deviation. They perform an alternate cover test with increasing prism strength until the deviation is reversed. They interpret the test accurately.

Poor trainees leave the patient unclear what is expected of them. They are unfamiliar with the prism bar. They miss important steps and they fail to assess the angle with acceptable accuracy.

Poor Fair Good V Good n/a
Explanation of test
Appropriate positioning of  prism bar
Assessment of angle
Interpretation of results
Overall performance in this assessment Poor Fair Good V Good
Summative Outcome (Delete as appropriate if tool used for summative assessments)                             Pass/Fail 
(Note: "Pass" requires an overall assessment grade of "Good" and NO individual "Poor" grades.) 


Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.

              

Anything especially good?


Suggestions for development:




Agreed action:


              

Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee:

Clinical Rating Scale CRS6 (Outcome CA6: IOP MeASUREMENT)

COECSA Workplace Based Assessments

Clinical Rating Scale CRS6 (CA6: IOP Measurement)

All trainees must be able to measure the intraocular pressure accurately using a variety of applanation techniques and understand the limits of each.  They must be able to check the calibration of the tonometer.


Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                                                         Date (dd/mm/yyyy)          

YEAR1                                        YEAR 2                            YEAR 3                                    YEAR 4                                   Other (specify)

Assessor's name:


Assessor's status:         Consultant                                               AHP                           Other (Specify)


Brief description of case(s)                                  

Please grade the following areas using the scale below (use tick or cross)

Attitude and manner
V good trainees introduce themselves and establish the identity of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer). Their demeanour throughout shows that they are attentive to the patient by gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They clearly explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out.  They ensure that the patient is comfortable and that adequate privacy is maintained.

Poor trainees fail to introduce themselves and do not identify the patient. They appear to hurry or ignore what the patient is saying.  They do not explain the test in an appropriate manner.  They pay little or no attention to confirmation of patient comfort or privacy.

Poor Fair Good V Good n/a
Introduction and explanation of examination
Rapport with patient, empathy and sensitivity to age and context
Respect for patient and their comfort


IOP measurement (Technique: Goldmann/Tonopen/Perkins/other)
V good trainees ensure adequate disinfection of the tonometer before and after use. They insert appropriate amounts of appropriate drops, avoid contact of the tonometer with lids or lashes and complete the measurement swiftly without prolonged contact between tonometer and cornea. They achieve a reading accurate to within 2 mm Hg of the assessor’s reading. They are conversant with all types of IOP measurement methods and the advantages and disadvantages of each.

Poor trainees have to be prompted to ensure disinfection of the tonometer tip before and after use.  They insert inappropriate quantities of anaesthetic drops or use inappropriate drops.  They push roughly on the patient’s eye and lids and touch the tonometer on the lids.  They have difficulty achieving a reading, requiring several attempts, and fail to achieve accuracy to within 2 mm Hg.  They frequently cause trauma to the corneal epithelium. They are not fully aware of all types of measurement methods or their advantages and disadvantages.

Poor Fair Good V Good n/a
Consent for test
Application of anaesthesia and fluorescein
Stabilisation of lids and eye
Use of tonometer.  Accurate placement on eye
Accurate IOP recording.  Accurate to within 2mm Hg
Interpretation of result
Corneal appearance after examination
Care of tonometer head
Infection control
Checking calibration of tonometer
V good trainees know how to use the calibration arm and what to do if the reading is inaccurate.

Poor trainees do not know what to do with the calibration arm and do not know what an inaccurate reading is, or what to do about it.

Poor Fair Good V Good n/a
Knowledge of reasons for calibration
Appropriate use of calibration arm
Interpretation of results
Appropriate action taken
Overall performance in this assessment Poor Fair Good V Good


Outcome (Delete as appropriate)                              Pass/Fail

NB The following boxes MUST be completed:

              


Please note any aspects which were especially good:

Please note any suggestions for improvement and action points:

              


Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee:

Clinical Rating scale CRS7 (CA7: Use of Slit Lamp)

COECSA Workplace Based Assessments

Clinical Rating Scale CRS7 (CA7: Use of Slit Lamp)

All trainees must be able to examine the eye and adjacent structures using the slit lamp and interpret their findings. They must be able to employ all of the functions of the slit lamp and use accessory equipment when indicated. They must know how to care for the equipment properly and prevent cross infection.

                                                                                              

Trainee’s Nam                                                                                                                                                        Date (dd/mm/yyyy)              

YEAR 1                                YEAR 2                   YEAR 3            YEAR 4             Other (specify)

Assessor's name                                                                                          Type of assessment:  Formative          Summative                                                                

Assessor's status           Consultant                       Senior Trainee                    Other (Specify)

Brief description of case                                       

                                              


Please grade the following areas using the scale below (use tick or cross)

Attitude and manner
V good trainees introduce themselves and establish the name of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer). Their demeanour throughout shows that they are attentive to the patient by gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They clearly explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out.

Poor trainees fail to introduce themselves and do not identify the patient.  They appear to hurry or ignore what the patient is saying. They do not explain the test in an appropriate manner.

Poor Fair Good V Good n/a
Introduction and explanation of examination
Rapport with patient, empathy and sensitivity to age and context
Respect for patient
Knowledge of slit lamp
V good trainees set up the slit lamp properly in advance of conducting the examination. They appropriately set the IPD and focus of each eyepiece, and have a good knowledge of all the slit lamp functions and techniques of illumination to achieve the optimum view of the part of the eye being examined. They know what adjustments to make to view different areas of the anterior and posterior segment. They are aware of appropriate care and maintenance of the slit lamp.

Poor trainees fail to set up the slit lamp properly. Their examination technique is slip shod and halting and they make constant aimless readjustments. They appear unaware of the best slit lamp settings to optimise the examination of different parts of the anterior and posterior segments. 

Poor Fair Good V Good n/a
Appropriate IPD
Appropriate eyepiece focus
Appropriate selection of slit beam size and angle
Use of full range of available magnification powers
Use of appropriate filters

Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee:


Clinical Rating scale CRS8 (CA8: Fundus Examination – Direct opthalmoscope)

COECSA Workplace Based Assessments

Clinical Rating Scale CRS8 (CA8: Fundus Examination)

All trainees must be able to examine the fundus of the eye using appropriate techniques and interpret their findings. They must be able to use the direct and indirect ophthalmoscopes. They must be able to use a variety of lenses for binocular fundus examination with the slit lamp. They must be able to use appropriate indentation techniques.

                              

Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                Date (dd/mm/yyyy)                

YEAR 1                                YEAR 2                   YEAR 3            YEAR 4             Other (specify)

Assessor's name                                                                                           Type of assessment:  Formative         Summative                                                              

Assessor's status           Consultant                       Senior Trainee                  Other (Specify)

Brief description of case                                       


Please grade the following areas using the scale below (use tick or cross)

Attitude and manner
V good trainees introduce themselves and establish the name of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer). Their demeanour throughout shows that they are attentive to the patient by gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They clearly explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out.

Poor trainees fail to introduce themselves and do not identify the patient.  They appear to hurry or ignore what the patient is saying. They do not explain the test in an appropriate manner.

Poor Fair Good V Good n/a
Introduction and explanation of examination
Rapport with patient, empathy and sensitivity to age and context
Respect for patient
Aware of patient’s comfort
Direct ophthalmoscope
V good trainees check the ophthalmoscope before using it. They select the most appropriate colour, shape, size and brightness of light beam at every stage. They always choose the most appropriate correcting lens. They explain the procedure and show that they understand the discomfort caused by the brightness of the light. They readily achieve a good view of the central fundus and achieve a view as far peripherally as is feasible. Their technique is efficient and fluent. They will describe their findings accurately.

Poor trainees launch into the examination without checking the instrument settings. They show no understanding of the uses of the different settings. Their use of the lenses is haphazard. They are unable to co-ordinate an examination of the peripheral fundus. They fail to understand and empathise with the patient when the patient finds the light uncomfortable. They miss abnormalities altogether and/or fail to describe them.

Poor Fair Good V Good n/a
Instructions to patient
Familiarity with use of ophthalmoscope
Correct use of illumination
Appropriate use of lenses
Description of findings
Clinical Rating scale CRS8 (CA8: Fundus Examination – indirect ophthalmoscope)

COECSA Workplace Based Assessments

Clinical Rating Scale CRS8 (CA8: Fundus Examination)

All trainees must be able to examine the fundus of the eye using appropriate techniques and interpret their findings. They must be able to use the direct and indirect ophthalmoscopes. They must be able to use a variety of lenses for binocular fundus examination with the slit lamp. They must be able to use appropriate indentation techniques.

Indirect ophthalmoscope
V good trainees adjust the equipment appropriately before use, in particular adjusting the light for optimum viewing. They examine the patient in a reclined position whenever appropriate and ensure their comfort. They choose the most appropriate condensing lens and demonstrate an efficient and fluent technique, holding the lens at the best distance from the eye. When appropriate they use indentation efficiently and gently. They use the minimum light necessary for a proper view and empathise with the patient when the light or the indentation causes discomfort. They describe their findings accurately.

Poor trainees struggle to place the ophthalmoscope in position on their head squarely and securely. They are unable to adjust the light appropriately. They fail to ensure that the patient is comfortable or appropriately positioned. They use too much or too little illumination. Their use and positioning of the lens is haphazard. They are unable to co-ordinate an examination of the peripheral fundus and are rough with and/or unsuccessful at indentation. They fail to understand and empathise with the patient when the patient finds the test uncomfortable. If they manage to achieve a view at all they miss abnormalities altogether and/or fail to describe them.

Poor Fair Good V Good n/a
Instructions to patient
Familiarity with use of ophthalmoscope
Correct use of illumination
Appropriate use of lenses
Indentation technique
Description of findings
Clinical Rating scale CRS8 (CA8: Fundus Examination – 78d/90d lens)

COECSA Workplace Based Assessments

Clinical Rating Scale CRS8 (CA8: Fundus Examination)

78D/90D lens
Very good trainees set up the slit lamp illumination and eyepieces before commencing the examination. They help the patient to get into position if necessary. They warn of the brightness of the light. They select the most appropriate lens and show expertise in holding it in the correct position and orientation. They choose the most appropriate colour, size and brightness of light at every stage and empathise with the patient who has difficulty looking in the correct direction. Thel have a fluent technique and achieve as good a view of both central and peripheral retina as is possible. They describe their findings accurately.

Poor trainees rush into the examination without setting the slit lamp properly. They start with an inappropriately bright light but have to fiddle around to get it pointing correctly. They show frustration when the patient cannot place his/her head appropriately or cannot move the eye into the desired position. They choose an inappropriate lens and/or show difficulty in getting it positioned correctly. If they manage to achieve a view at all they miss abnormalities altogether and/or fail to describe them.

Poor Fair Good V Good n/a
Instructions to patient
Familiarity with use of lenses
Correct use of slit lamp illumination
Appropriate use of lenses
Description of findings
Clinical Rating Scale CRSret (Outcome PS1a: Refraction)

COECSA  Workplace Based Assessments

Clinical Rating Scale CRSret (Outcome PS1a: Refraction)

All trainees must be able to perform an accurate refraction objective and subjective refraction, performing appropriate tests (for adults) and provide an appropriate prescription.


Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                                                         Date (dd/mm/yyyy)                  

     YEAR1                                YEAR 2                            YEAR 3                                    YEAR 4                                   Other (specify)

Assessor's name:


Assessor's status:         Consultant                                               AHP                           Other (Specify)


Brief description of case                                      

Attitude and manner
V good trainees introduce themselves and establish the identity of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer). Their demeanour throughout the interview shows that they are actively listening to the patient by gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They establish a good rapport with the patient which is respectful of any ethnic, religious or social preferences that they express. They are empathic and sensitive to the patient’s concerns. They ensure that the patient is comfortable and that adequate privacy is maintained. They guide the patient considerately through the clinical examination.

Poor trainees neither introduce themselves nor identify the patient. They hurry the patient and ignore what the patient is saying.  They look away or appear impatient during the history taking.  They are unable to establish rapport with the patient and show little respect. They pay little or no attention to confirmation of patient comfort or privacy. They proceed with the examination without adequate explanation and with little consideration for patient comfort.

Poor Fair Good V Good n/a
Introduction and start of interview
Rapport with patient and development of trust
Listening skills, appropriate eye contact and non-verbal communication
Empathy and sensitivity
Respect for patient
Retinoscopy
V good trainees carry out an examination in an appropriate environment, and allow adequate time for full cycloplegia if needed.  They carry out an accurate retinoscopy at a suitable working distance. Use of lenses and frames is tidy and efficient. Their examination is fluent where possible and appropriate opportunities are maximised when cooperation is suboptimal. Accurate notation of retinoscopy, using power crosses and indication of working distances, is used. An appropriate prescription is then calculated with an understanding of adjustments made in relation to the clinical case. They carry out proper subjective refraction.

Poor trainees position the patient or themselves poorly. They do not allow adequate time for cycloplegia. They do not attend to the room environment (patient comfort, lighting etc). Retinoscopy is chaotic with untidy use of lenses and other equipment. Notation of findings is unclear or ambiguous. They do not understand the importance of adjusting the final prescription.

Poor Fair Good V Good n/a
Patient positioning/room setup
Appropriate cycloplegia
Use of trial frame/lenses
Appropriate refining (Cross cylinder, Duochrome test)
Time taken/flow of examination
Accuracy of retinoscopy
Notation of retinoscopy/working distance
Appropriate prescription issued
Overall performance in this assessment Poor Fair Good V Good

Outcome (Delete as appropriate)            Pass/Fail

Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.

Anything especially good? Suggestions for development:
Agreed action:


              

Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee

CRSret (Outcome PS1b: Cycloplegic Refraction)

COECSA Workplace Based Assessments

Clinical Rating Scale CRSret (Outcome PS1b: Cycloplegic Refraction)

All trainees must be able to perform an accurate cycloplegic refraction (especially on a child) and provide an appropriate prescription.


Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                                                         Date (dd/mm/yyyy)                  

     YEAR1                                YEAR 2                            YEAR 3                                    YEAR 4            Other (specify)

Assessor's name:


Assessor's status:         Consultant                                               AHP                           Other (Specify)


Brief description of case                                      

Attitude and manner
V good trainees introduce themselves and establish the name of the child and any other attendant (e.g. parent, carer). They explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out. They interact with the child using language and gestures appropriate for the child’s age. They are sympathetic to any distress felt by the child or carer and offer on-going encouragement and praise throughout the examination. They display good judgement regarding the limitations of the assessment and pursuit of clinical signs.

Poor trainees neither introduce themselves nor identify the patient.  They are insensitive to distress felt by the child and their carer. Their demeanour is often inappropriate for the child’s age and they make little attempt to interact with the child. They offer little or no encouragement. They needlessly prolong the examination to no benefit.

Poor Fair Good V Good n/a
Introduction and explanation of examination
Rapport with child/carer, empathy and sensitivity to age and context
Respect for child/carer
Retinoscopy
V good trainees carry out an examination in an appropriate environment, and allow adequate time for full cycloplegia.  They carry out an accurate retinoscopy at a suitable working distance. Use of lenses and frames is tidy and efficient. Their examination is fluent where possible and appropriate opportunities are maximised when cooperation is suboptimal. Accurate notation of retinoscopy, using power crosses and indication of working distances, is used. An appropriate prescription is then calculated with an understanding of adjustments made in relation to the clinical case.

Poor trainees position the patient or themselves poorly. They do not allow adequate time for cycloplegia. They do not attend to the room environment (patient comfort, lighting etc). Retinoscopy is chaotic with untidy use of lenses and other equipment. Notation of findings is unclear or ambiguous. They do not understand the importance of adjusting the final prescription.

Poor Fair Good V Good n/a
Patient positioning/room setup
Appropriate cycloplegia
Use of trial frame/lenses
Time taken/flow of examination
Accuracy of retinoscopy
Notation of retinoscopy/working distance
Appropriate prescription issued
Overall performance in this assessment Poor Fair Good V Good


Outcome (Delete as appropriate)            Pass/Fail

Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.

              

Anything especially good?


Suggestions for development:


Agreed action:

              

Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee

Clinical Rating scale CRS13 (CA13:  Gonioscopy)

COECSA Workplace Based Assessments

Clinical rating Scale CRS13 (CA13: Gonioscopy)

All trainees must be able to perform gonioscopy using an indirect gonioscopy lens, identify the major angle landmarks, record their findings using a major grading system and clinically apply their findings.

 

Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Date (dd/mm/yyyy)         

YEAR1                                                                 YEAR 2                            YEAR 3                                    YEAR 4                                   Other (specify)

Assessor's name:


Assessor's status:          Consultant                                                 AHP                                                     Other (Specify)


Brief description of case(s)                                                                                     

Please grade the following areas using the scale below (use tick or cross)

Attitude and manner
V good trainees introduce themselves and establish the identity of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer). Their demeanour throughout shows that they are attentive to the patient by gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They clearly explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out.  They ensure that the patient is comfortable and that adequate privacy is maintained.

Poor trainees fail to introduce themselves and do not identify the patient.  They appear to hurry or ignore what the patient is saying. They do not explain the test in an appropriate manner.  They pay little or no attention to confirmation of patient comfort or privacy.

Poor Fair Good V Good n/a
Introduction and explanation of examination
Rapport with patient, empathy and sensitivity to age and context
Respect for patient and their comfort
Gonioscopy (Technique: indirect, dynamic, corneal light wedge)
V good trainees ensure adequate disinfection of the gonioscopy lens before and after use. They anesthetize the eye. They do not cause corneal abrasions.  They record angle findings to within 1 grade of the assessor’s findings. They can identify all major angle landmarks, perform the corneal light wedge technique and dynamic gonioscopy when indicated.  They are conversant with the different types of grading systems and understand the advantages and disadvantages of each.

Poor trainees have to be prompted to ensure disinfection of gonioscopy lens before and after use. They insert inappropriate quantities of anaesthetic drops or use inappropriate drops.  They push roughly on the patient’s eye with the lens and frequently cause trauma to the corneal epithelium.  They have difficulty identifying and interpreting the angle. They do not know when or how to perform the corneal light wedge technique or dynamic gonioscopy.  They are not conversant with the major grading systems of the angle nor are they able to explain the advantages and disadvantages of each. 

Poor Fair Good V Good n/a
Consent for test
Application of anaesthesia
Stabilisation of lids and eye
Use of the gonioscopy lens
Accurate angle recording within 1 grade of assessor
Interpretation of result
Corneal appearance after examination
Care of gonioscopy lens
Infection control
Overall performance in this assessment Poor Fair Good V Good

Outcome (Delete as appropriate)                              Pass/Fail

NB The following boxes MUST be completed:

                               


Please note any aspects which were especially good:

Please note any suggestions for improvement and action points:


Signature of assessor:                                                                                           Signature of trainee:

Case-based Discussion (CbD)

Competence in patient investigation, patient management, and community eye health, and some aspects of best practice domain is assessed using a CbD form. These forms can be completed by trainers in the following circumstances:

  • During an out-patient clinic. Trainers and trainees may wish to allocate 5-10 minutes to discuss the management of a patient seen during an out-patient clinic. Case selection would be determined by either the trainee or trainer. The trainee should have had some direct clinical role with the patient e.g. history taking, clinical examination, investigations ordered or interpreted, management decisions, management of complications, critical incidents etc.
  • At the end of an out-patient clinic. Trainers and trainees may wish to allocate some time at the end of clinic to review a small number of case notes where the trainee has had a significant role in the management of the patient.
  • Case presentations during postgraduate teaching. Trainees are often asked to present cases at local or regional postgraduate teaching sessions. A nominated trainer should complete a CbD form after the presentation.
  • During a designated teaching session. Trainers and trainees may wish to allocate a period of one-to-one teaching or small group teaching where cases are discussed and a CbD form completed.

A list of Clinical Scenarios (approximately 40) that cover most of the COECSA curriculum is provided in the Study Guide  link. Trainees should aim to cover all these scenarios in their case based discussions if possible so that their portfolio reflects a wide range of clinical management situations.

It is recommended that about half the cases for CbD are chosen by the trainee and half by the trainer.

Trainees need to complete 10 CbDs during each year of training and these should be suitably spread throughout the year. By the end of training a trainee's portfolio should contain at least 40 CbD forms. Case based discussion is an important way to show that a trainee is developing her or his patient management skills and that he/she is able to relate his/her knowledge and skills to everyday ophthalmic practice. It is therefore appropriate that the level of competence documented on the CbD forms during Yr1 and Yr2 is at a lower level than during Yr3 and Yr4.

Clinical Scenarios

As an ophthalmologist you will be expected to manage a range of clinical scenarios. This may involve referrals from other health professionals, patient self-referrals or screening for ophthalmic disease.

Below is a list of typical problems that may present to an ophthalmologist.

Symptoms Signs

Decreased Vision

  • Transient
  • Sudden
  • Gradual
  • Painful

Diplopia

Distortion

Dry Eyes

Floaters

Headache

Night Blindness

Pain

  • Ocular
  • Periocular

Red Eye

Trauma

Visual Disturbance

Watery

Ametropia

Corneal Opacities

Conjunctival Pigmentation

Dysgenesis/Colobomata

Lens Opacities

Lid Lumps

Lid Malposition

Macular Exudation

Nystagmus

Ocular Tumours

Optic Disc Atrophy/Swelling

Proptosis

Pupil Abnormalities

Raised Intraocular Pressure

Retinal Haemorrhages

Retinal Pigmentation

Strabismus

Visual Field Defects

Visual Handicap in a Child

Vasculature abnormalities


During your training you will be expected to discuss the management of patients with seniors in the form of a Case-Based Discussion. You should ensure that during your training all these common clinical presentations have been covered in at least one case-based discussion.

In addition, these clinical scenarios may form a focus for learning. Using these commonly encountered scenarios enhances the value of on-the-job learning, increasing learning efficiency and relevancy.

Whilst learning about a patient with one of the above clinical problems you should consider which learning outcomes may be addressed. By thinking of the patient's problem in terms of the 10 learning outcome domains, you can integrate your knowledge (basic science and clinical), skills and attitudes.

The scenarios may be used in a variety of learning situations e.g. clinics, theatre, small / large group teaching, independent study.

Case-based Discussion (CbD) assessment form

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     

Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                                                         Date (dd/mm/year)

   

     YEAR1                           YEAR2                                             YEAR 3                            YEAR 4                                   Other (specify)

Assessor's name:


Assessor's status:         Consultant                                               AHP                           Other (Specify)


Clinical Scenario (see Study Guide )


Diagnosis


Overall difficulty of case                Simple                                                        Intermediate                                                                 Difficult

Subspecialty: Plastics/Lac/Orbits      Cornea/Ext       Cataract/Ref          Glaucoma       Retina/Uvea/Onco       Neuro        Paeds/Strab

(if identifiable)

Please grade the trainee’s performance under the curricular domains as listed below.

Topic Poor Fair Good V Good n/a
Medical Record Keeping
Clinical Assessment
Investigation and Referrals
Treatment
Follow-up and Future Planning
Professionalism
Clinical Judgment
Leadership/Manager Issues
Overall performance in this assessment Poor Fair Good V Good

Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.


Please note any aspects which were especially good (assessor):


Please note any suggestions for improvement and action points (assessor):


What have I learnt (Trainee):

Now associate this to the 3 most relevant Learning Outcomes consider choosing one from each Curriculum theme


Signature of assessor:                                                         Signature of trainee:


_______________________                                                          _____________________________

Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS)

Competence in 19 of the 14 practical skills (PS) listed in the COECSA curriculum, and in surgical skills (SS13, SS14 and SS15) is assessed using a modified version of the F2 DOPS rating scale. [PS1 (refraction) is assessed by CRSretPS1a for adults, CRSret, Retinoscopy paediatric and formal COECSA examination.

How a practical procedure is taught will be determined by the individual trainer and informed by an appropriate training the trainers course. When trainees have the opportunity to perform the procedure themselves they must do so under appropriate supervision. The supervisor will be able to complete a DOPS at the end of the procedure. If there are aspects of the procedure that are not performed satisfactorily the completed DOPS will act as a guide for training and inform the next attempt. It is expected that for some of the more complex practical procedures e.g. PS2 "Drug administration", a trainee will require assessment on more than one occasion (heir portfolio will reflect  this). Where possible a trainee will arrange to have at least 2 satisfactory DOPS for each of the relevant Learning Outcomes. Where opportunities to perform a procedure are scarce e.g. PS11"Corneal glue", it may be appropriate for the portfolio to contain only one DOPS. The ultimate decision as to how many are appropriate will be the responsibility institution examination committee.

Where appropriate it is useful for initial DOPS to be completed using any simulators that are available e.g. in a clinical skills centre. The DOPS form must make it clear that the assessment has been carried out using a simulator.

Trainees should also maintain a logbook of procedures performed with reflective comments where appropriate as part of their portfolio.

Where a trainee has an opportunity to perform a practical procedure that is not included in the curriculum e.g. as part of sub-specialty training, she/he is encouraged to ask the trainer to complete a DOPS for inclusion in the portfolio.

The following practical skills Learning Outcomes are assessed by DOPS:

Learning Outcome(Click here for DOPS form) Target Year (TYA)* Comments
PS8 Ocular surface FB 1 DOPS can be completed by an appropriately trained nurse or senior resident
PS5 Tear film 2 DOPS can be completed by senior Resident
PS6 Lacrimal drainage DOPS can be completed by senior Resident
PS7 Corneal scrape 2
PS9 Removal of sutures 2 DOPS can be completed by an appropriately trained nurse
PS14 Perform/teach hand hygiene 2 DOPS can be completed by an appropriately trained nurse
PS2 Local anaesthesia 3 May require several DOPS for different LA techniques
PS10 Fit a bandage contact lens 3 DOPS can be completed by an appropriately trained nurse
SS13 Laser to the lens capsule 3
SS14 Laser for raised intraocular pressure 3/4 (annual review) May require several DOPS for different laser therapies
S15 Laser for retinal problems 3/4 (annual review) May require several DOPS for different laser therapies
PS3 Diathermy 3 May be incorporated with a surgical OSATS
PS2 Intraocular/periocular drugs ¾ May require several DOPS for different LA techniques
PS4 Cryotherapy ¾ May be incorporated with a surgical OSATS
PS11 Corneal glue ¾ .
PS13 Ocular /orbital ultrasound ¾ .
SS16 AC/vitreous tap ¾ .
SS10 Prepare biopsy ¾ .
PS12 Forced duction test ¾ .

* The TYA represents the latest year that a trainee should normally achieve the specified LO. Trainees are encouraged to seek assessment using DOPS when an opportunity arises and not wait until the target year.

By completion of training a trainee's portfolio may contain around 60 satisfactory DOPS forms

Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) form

COECSA Workplace Based Assessment and Feedback Form

Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS)

 

Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                                                                                         Date (dd/mm/yyyy)                  

Trainee's year:            Year1                       Year 2                   Year 3            Year4                                Other (specify)

Assessor's name

 

Assessor's status           Consultant                      Senior Trainee                                Other (Specify)                                  

 

Learning Outcome     Title                                                                                                                                                                                      Code

                                 

Brief description of procedure

Overall difficulty of case                                        Simple                                                        Intermediate                                                                 Difficult


Number of times procedure performed before One                                                   Two to four                      Five to nine                                  More than nine          


Procedure performed on                                      Simulator                           Wet lab                       Volunteer                 Patient

Please grade the following areas using the scale below (use tick or cross)


Poor Fair Good V Good n/a
1       Demonstrates understanding of indications, relevant anatomy,          techniques of procedure
2       Obtains informed consent
3       Demonstrates appropriate preparation pre-procedure
4       Appropriate analgesia
5       Technical ability
6       Aseptic technique
7       Seeks help where appropriate
8       Awareness of potential complications and how to avoid them
9       Post procedure management
10     Communication skills
11     Consideration to patient/professionalism
Overall performance in this assessment Poor Fair Good V Good

Outcome (Delete as appropriate)            Meets Expectations/Does not meet Expectations     (for stage of training)

Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.

Anything especially good? (assessor) Suggestions for development (assessor)
What have I learnt? (trainee)


Signature of assessor:                                                        Signature of trainee:

Multi-Source Feedback (MSF)

Whilst several of the other Work-Based Assessments (WBA) will require a trainer to assess the trainee's attitude to the patient, some of the "Best Practice" (BP) and Communication (COM) learning outcomes will be assessed using MSF. (BP17 is actually achieved by taking part in MSF.) The MSF will be performed electronically via the on-line portfolio or by paper format. The process for obtaining MSF, which will be required on at least an annual basis, will resemble the following:

  • The trainee identifies 15 people who can be approached to give feedback. The list should include consultant supervisors and trainers, other trainees, Rota organizer, allied health professionals (nurses, orthoptists, optometrists), clerical/secretarial/administrative staff.
  • The trainee enters the details of these chosen assessors into the on-line or paper format portfolio
  • The list is approved on-line/or paper by the trainee's educational supervisor
  • The staff on the trainee's list are contacted by email by letter and asked to complete an on-line or paper feedback form that will cover the appropriate areas of the curriculum. The trainee will not see individual responses.
  • The results of feedback are collated and a report is produced.
  • The trainee completes a self-assessment
  • The MSF report is sent to the trainee's educational supervisor who arranges to meet with the trainee to discuss the contents and any action required.

The following LO will be assessed using MSF:

Learning Outcome (LO) Typical question Feedback likely from*
PS21

SS3

CEH3

Hand hygiene

Asepsis

X-infection

Follows local guidelines on general cleanliness and avoidance of cross infection MS, AHP
COM1 Rapport Establishes a trusting clinical relationship with patients MS, AHP
COM2 Listen Listens effectively to patients MS, AHP
COM3 Deliver Provides information to patients in an appropriate and sensitive manner MS, AHP
COM5 Consent Obtains valid consent in an appropriate manner MS, AHP
COM6 Breaking bad news Communicates potentially upsetting information in an appropriate and sensitive manner MS, AHP
COM7 Language Makes allowances/provisions for difficulties in communication that may affect the patient MS, AHP
COM8 Body language Uses body language to good effect in communication MS, AHP, S&C
COM10 Professionals Communicates well with clinical and non-clinical colleagues MS, AHP, S&C
COM11

COM12

Written notes The doctor writes notes and dictates letters clearly MS, AHP, S&C
COM14 Leave Complies with local policies for the approval of leave and makes appropriate arrangements for cover MS, AHP, S&C
BP10 Compassion Has a compassionate approach to patient care MS, AHP
BP11 Autonomy Respects the patient's wishes when making clinical decisions MS, AHP
BP12 Considerate Behaves in a considerate and sensitive manner towards all patients MS, AHP, S&C
BP13 Empathy Shows appropriate empathy with patients MS, AHP, S&C
BP14 Confidentiality Respects the confidential nature of clinical information obtained from patients MS, AHP, S&C
BP15 Limits Works within the limits of her/his clinical competence MS, AHP
BP16 Help Seeks help and advice from clinical colleagues when appropriate MS, AHP
BP18 Equality Treats all patients equally, avoiding discrimination MS, AHP, S&C
BP20 Legal Practices according to the National medical and dental practitioners council's guidelines for doctors MS
BP24 Prioritize Prioritizes tasks appropriately, ensuring urgent and important matters are dealt with promptly MS, AHP, S&C
BP30 Stress Copes well when under stress MS, AHP, S&C

* Feedback from:

  • MS=medical staff
  • AHP=allied health professional (nurse, optometrist, orthoptists)
  • S&C= secretarial and clerical staff
Multi-Source Feedback (MSF) form

                             

Trainee’s Name                                                                                                                         Date (dd/mm/year)                      

Trainee's year: Year 1          Year 2           Year 3          Year 4                      Other (specify)

Assessor's name:


Assessor's status:         Consultant                                               AHP                           Other (Specify)

Please grade the trainee’s performance against the statements as listed below

(Indicate “n/a” if you are unable to comment on any particular statement)

(*Note: This is an anonymous assessment but comments may inevitably provide a clue to their origin. If you have anxieties about making particular comments in writing please indicate “will discuss” and do so as soon as possible with an appropriate consultant supervisor in your unit.)

Curricular

Codes

Statement

They perform to a high standard in this area of practice

(Tick)

I have no concerns in this area of practice

(Tick)

I have some

Concerns in this area of practice

(Tick)

n/a

(Tick)

Comments*

(Essential if concerns exist)

(Continue overleaf if necessary)

PS21/

SS3

Follows local guidelines on general cleanliness and avoidance of cross infection
COM1 Establishes a trusting clinical relationship with patients
COM2 Listens effectively to patients


COM3 Provides information to patients in an appropriate and sensitive manner
COM5 Obtains valid consent in an appropriate manner
COM6 Communicates potentially upsetting information in an appropriate and sensitive manner
COM7 Makes allowances/provisions for difficulties in communication that may affect the patient
COM8 Uses body language to good effect in communication
COM10 Communicates well with clinical and non-clinical colleagues
COM11

COM12

The doctor writes notes and dictates letters clearly
COM14 Complies with local policies for the approval of leave and makes appropriate arrangements for cover
BP10 Has a compassionate approach to patient care
BP11 Respects the patient’s wishes when making clinical decisions
BP12 Behaves in a considerate and sensitive manner towards all patients
BP13 Shows appropriate empathy with patients




Curricular

Codes

Statement

They perform to a high standard in this area of practice

(tick)

I have no concerns in this area of practice

(Tick)

I have some

Concerns in this area of practice

(Tick)

n/a

(Tick)

Comments*

(Essential if concerns exist)

(Continue overleaf if necessary)

BP14 Respects the confidential nature of clinical information obtained from patients
BP15 Works within the limits of her/his clinical competence
BP16 Seeks help and advice from clinical colleagues when appropriate
BP18 Treats all patients equally, avoiding discrimination
BP20 Practises according to the National medical and dental practitioner’s council's guidelines for doctors
BP24 Prioritizes tasks appropriately, ensuring urgent and important matters are dealt with promptly
BP30 Copes well when under stress


Space for further comments (please indicate Curricular Code to which comments refer, e.g. “BP10” etc.)
Objectively Structured Assessment Of Technical Skills (OSATS)

How a surgical procedure is taught will be determined by the individual trainer and informed by an appropriate training the trainers course (where available). When trainees have the opportunity to perform the procedure themselves they must do so under appropriate supervision. The supervisor will be able to complete an OSATS at the end of the procedure. If there are aspects of the procedure that are not performed satisfactorily the completed OSATS will act as a guide for training and inform the next attempt. Where possible a trainee will arrange to have at least 2 satisfactory OSATS for each of the Surgical Skills Learning Outcomes.

It is expected that several OSATS will be completed and kept in the trainee's portfolio, before the first satisfactory OSATS is achieved for an individual Learning Outcome. It is important that a trainee and trainer understand that this is an important part of training and does not represent a problem with a trainee.

Trainees should also maintain a logbook of surgical and laser procedures performed with reflective comments where appropriate as part of their portfolio.

Where appropriate it is useful for initial OSATS to be completed using any simulators that are available e.g. in a wet lab. The OSATS form must make it clear that the assessment has been carried out using a simulator.

The following surgical Learning Outcomes are assessed by OSATS:

WpBA Learning Outcome (LO) Target Year (TYA)* Comments
OSATS2 SS2 Operating microscope 1 This LO can be assessed by a senior resident (year   3 or 4)
OSATS3 SS3 Aseptic technique 1 This LO can be assessed by an appropriately trained theatre nurse
OSATS1 SS1 Microsurgical skills 2


OSATS after initial TYA should reflect an increase in complexity of cases

OSATS1 SS7 Lid surgery ¾
OSATS1 SS4 Cataract surgery ¾
OSATS1 SS11 Temporal artery biopsy 2
OSATS1 SS5 Procedures to lower IOP ¾
OSATS1 SS6 Ocular and adnexal trauma 2
OSATS1 SS8 Ocular surface protection 1
OSATS1 SS9 Lateral canthotomy/cantholysis 2
OSATS1 SS10 Biopsy ocular and adnexal tissue 2
OSATS1 SS12 Extraocular muscle surgery ¾
OSATS1 SS13 Removal of the eye 2 This LO can be assessed by a senior resident (year   3 or 4)
OSATS1 SS17 Anterior Vitrectomy ¾


* The TYA represents the latest year that a trainee must achieve the specified LO. Trainees are encouraged to seek assessment using OSATS when an opportunity arises and not wait until the target year.

The COECSA MSICS-OSCAR

The COECSA MSICS-OSCAR

This should be completed at the end of the case and immediately discussed with the student to provide timely, structured, specific performance feedback. Circle the appropriate cells and if previous MSICS-OSCARS are available review them in order to develop a plan for improvement

  COECSA Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery -Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubric: (COECSA MSICS-OSCAR)
Date ___________


Resident _______


Evaluator _______

Novice

(score = 2)

Beginner

(score = 3)

Advanced Beginner

(score = 4)

Competent

(score = 5)

Not applicable. Done by consultant or senior resident (score= 0)
1   Draping: Unable to start draping without help. Drapes with minimal verbal instruction. Incomplete lash coverage. Lashes mostly covered, drape at most minimally obstructing view. Lashes completely covered and clear of incision site, drape not obstructing view.
2 Scleral access & Cauterization Unable to successfully access sclera. Cauterization insufficient or excessive both in intensity and localization. Accesses sclera but with difficulty and hesitation. Cauterization insufficient or excessive in location or intensity. Achieves good scleral access with mild difficulty. Adequate cauterization. Precisely and deftly accesses sclera. Appropriate and precise cauterization.
3 Sclerocorneal Tunnel  Inappropriate incision depth, location, and size, hesitant dissection. Iris prolapse may occur One of the following correct: incision depth, location or size.  Able to dissect forward but not able to perceive depth Two of the following are correct: incision depth, location or size. Understands that tunnel depth is incorrect but unable to correct. Good incision depth, location and size. Tunnel constructed at right plane, if inappropriate plane, able to rectify.  
4 Corneal entry Hesitant keratome entry into AC. Unable to extend the internal valve. Significant shallowing of anterior chamber. Require wound extension or suturing. Enters into AC but difficulty in extension. Follows a different plane. Entry either anterior or posterior to dissection site. Mild AC shallowing. Require wound extension or suturing. Entry at right plane. Able to extend but with repeated use of viscoelastic. Internal valve irregular. Require wound extension or suturing. Fluently enters in right plane. Wound length adequate with no further need for extension. Retains viscoelastic during extension. Self-sealing, provides good access for surgical maneuvering.
5 Paracentesis & Viscoelastic insertion Chamber collapses on performing paracentesis. Inappropriate width, length and location. Pierces anterior capsule on entry.

Unsure of when, what type and how much viscoelastic to use. Has difficulty accessing anterior chamber through paracentesis.

Appropriate incision width, location or length. Anterior chamber shallows mildly. Requires minimal instruction. Knows when to use but administers incorrect amount or type of viscoelastic. Inappropriate location, width or length. Anterior chamber almost stable

Requires no instruction. Administers viscoelastic at appropriate time, amount, type, and cannula position.

Wound of adequate length, width, and correct location. Viscoelastics administered in appropriate amount, at appropriate time, with cannula tip clear of lens capsule and endothelium.
6 Capsulorrhexis: Commencement of Flap & follow-through. Instruction required, tentative, chases rather than controls rhexis, cortex disruption may occur. Minimal instruction, occasional loss of control of rhexis, cortex disruption may occur. In control, few awkward or repositioning movements, no cortex disruption. Delicate approach and confident control of the rhexis, no cortex disruption.
7 Capsulorrhexis: Formation and Circular Completion Size and position are inadequate for nucleus density, tear may occur. Size and position are barely adequate for nucleus density, difficulty achieving circular rhexis, tear may occur. Size and position are almost exact for nucleus density, shows control, and requires only minimal instruction. Adequate size and position for nucleus density, no tears, rapid, unaided control of radialization, maintains control of the flap and AC depth throughout the capsulorrhexis.
8 Hydrodissection: Visible Fluid Wave and Free prolapse of one pole of nucleus Hydrodissection fluid not injected in quantity or place to achieve nucleus rotation or prolapse. Multiple attempts required, able to prolapse nuclear pole after multiple efforts. Manually forces nucleus prolapse before adequate hydrodissection; cheese wiring. Fluid injected in appropriate location, able to prolapse one pole of nucleus but encounters more than minimal resistance. Ideally see free fluid wave, adequate for free nuclear hydroprolapse or mechanical prolapse with minimal resistance. Aware of contraindications to hydrodissection.
9 Prolapse of nucleus completely into AC Unable to dial nucleus into AC. Hooks anterior or posterior nuclear surface, nucleus rotates in the bag, iris and corneal touch, pupillary constriction, may damage capsule or zonules. Prolapses nucleus after repeated awkward attempts, needs instruction, churns cortex causing reduced visibility; iris or corneal touch; no damage to capsule or zonules. Prolapses nucleus into AC with more than minimal resistance. No corneal touch. Prolapse with minimal resistance. No damage to pupil and iris.
10 Nucleus extraction Damages endothelium, iris or capsule, unable to hold and extract nucleus, movements not coordinated. Movements coordinated but unable to extract nucleus, iris or corneal damage, unable to assess wound size in relation to nuclear density. Removes nucleus after repeated attempts, more than one piece, might need wound extension prior to extraction. Extracts nucleus with one or two attempts; proper wound size in relation to nuclear density.
11 Irrigation and Aspiration Technique with Adequate Removal of Cortex Great difficulty introducing the aspiration tip under the capsulorrhexis border, aspiration hole position not controlled, cannot regulate aspiration flow as needed, cannot peel cortical material adequately, engages capsule or iris with aspiration port. Moderate difficulty introducing aspiration tip under capsulorrhexis and maintaining hole up position, attempts to aspirate without occluding tip, shows poor comprehension of aspiration dynamics, cortical peeling is not well controlled, jerky and slow, capsule potentially compromised. Prolonged attempts result in minimal residual cortical material. Minimal difficulty introducing the aspiration tip under the capsulorrhexis, aspiration hole usually up, cortex will engaged for 360 degrees, cortical peeling slow, few technical errors, minimal residual cortical material. Some difficulty in removing sub incisional cortex Aspiration tip is introduced under the free border of the capsulorrhexis in irrigation mode with the aspiration hole up, Aspiration is activated in just enough flow as to occlude the tip, efficiently removes all cortex. The cortical material is peeled gently towards the center of the pupil, tangentially in cases of zonular weakness. No difficulty in removing subincisional cortex


12 Lens Insertion, Rotation, and Final Position of Intraocular Lens



Unable to insert IOL. Difficult insertion, manipulation of IOL, rough handling, unstable anterior chamber. Repeated hesitant attempts placing lower haptic in capsule, repeated attempts rotate upper haptic d into place with excessive force. Insertion and manipulation of IOL accomplished with minimal anterior chamber instability, the lower haptic is placed with some difficulty, upper haptic is rotated with some stress. Insertion and manipulation of IOL is performed in a deep, and stable anterior chamber and capsular bag, with incision appropriate for implant type.  The lower haptic is smoothly placed inside the capsular bag; the upper haptic is rotated or gently bent and inserted into place without exerting excessive stress to the capsulorrhexis or the zonule fibers.
13 Wound Closure (Including Suturing, Hydration, and Checking Security as Required) If suturing is needed, instruction is required and stitches are placed in an awkward, slow fashion with much difficulty, astigmatism, bent needles, incomplete suture rotation and wound leakage may result, unable to remove viscoelastics thoroughly. unable to make incision watertight or does not check wound for seal.  Improper final IOP. If suturing is needed, stitches are placed with some difficulty, resuturing may be needed, questionable wound closure with probable astigmatism, instruction may be needed, questionable whether all viscoelastics are thoroughly removed, Extra maneuvers are required to make the incision water tight at the end of the surgery. May have improper IOP. If suturing is needed, stitches are placed with minimal difficulty tight enough to maintain the wound closed, may have slight astigmatism, viscoelastics are adequately removed after this step with some difficulty, The incision is checked and is water tight or needs minimal adjustment at the end of the surgery. May have improper IOP. If suturing is needed, stitches are placed tight enough to maintain the wound closed, but not too tight as to induce astigmatism, viscoelastics are thoroughly removed after this step, the incision is checked and is water tight at the end of the surgery. Proper final IOP.
Global Indices
14 Wound Neutrality and Minimizing Eye Rolling and Corneal Distortion Nearly constant eye movement and corneal distortion. Eye often not in primary position, frequent distortion folds. Eye usually in primary position, mild corneal distortion folds occur. The eye is kept in primary position during the surgery. No distortion folds are produced. The length and location of incisions prevents distortion of the cornea.
15 Eye Positioned Centrally Within Microscope View Constantly requires repositioning. Occasional repositioning required. Mild fluctuation in pupil position. The pupil is kept centered during the surgery.
16 Conjunctival and Corneal Tissue Handling Tissue handling is rough and damage occurs. Tissue handling borderline, minimal damage occurs. Tissue handling decent but potential for damage exists. Tissue is not damaged nor at risk by handling.
17 Intraocular Spatial Awareness Instruments often in contact with capsule, iris, corneal endothelium; blunt second instrument not kept in appropriate position. Occasional contact with capsule, iris, corneal endothelium; sometimes has blunt second instrument in appropriate position. Rare contact with capsule, iris, endothelium. Often has blunt second hand instrument in appropriate position. No accidental contact with capsule, iris, corneal endothelium. Blunt, second hand instrument, is kept in appropriate position.
18 Iris Protection Iris constantly at risk, handled roughly. Iris occasionally at risk. Needs help in deciding when and how to use hooks, ring or other methods of iris protection. Iris generally well protected. Slight difficulty with iris hooks, ring or other methods of iris protection. Iris is uninjured. Iris hooks, ring, or other methods are used as needed to protect the iris.
19 Overall Speed and Fluidity of Procedure Hesitant, frequent starts and stops, not at all fluid. Occasional starts and stops, inefficient and unnecessary manipulations common, case duration about 60 minutes. Occasional inefficient and/or unnecessary manipulations occur, case duration about 45 minutes. Inefficient and/or unnecessary manipulations are avoided, case duration is appropriate for case difficulty. In general, 30 minutes should be adequate.

Overall difficulty of procedure (circle):           Simple             Intermediate                Difficult


Good points: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Suggestions for development: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Agreed action: ­­­­­­


Signature of Assessor: __________________________________        Signature of Trainee: ____________________________________

The COECSA TRAB-OSCAR

This should be completed at the end of the case and immediately discussed with the student to provide timely, structured, specific performance feedback. Circle the appropriate cells and if previous MSICS-OSCARS are available review them in order to develop a plan for improvement


COECSA Trabeculectomy-Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubric (COECSATRAB-OSCAR)


Resident: __________________  Assessor: ____________________         Year of Training:  __________    Date: ____________


Surgical Step


Novice

(score = 2)


Beginner

(score = 3)


Advanced Beginner

(score = 4)


Competent

(score = 5)

Not applicable. Done by consultant or senior resident (score= 0)
1 Universal precautions Has not heard of universal precautions. Aware of time-out process but not confident to perform. May perform with guidance/ prompting, but misses some information. Able to perform team time-out but needs prompting to do so. Independently initiates team time-out at beginning of case, identifies correct patient, procedure and side. Team members have been introduced. Alerts / allergies noted.  
2 Draping and placement of speculum Unable to start draping without help. Drapes with minimal verbal instruction. Incomplete lash coverage. Lashes mostly covered, drape at most minimally obstructing view.  Attains proper head position. Lashes completely covered and clear of incision site, drape not obstructing view.  
3 Corneal Traction Suture Unable to describe purpose and method of inserting corneal traction suture. Difficulty loading needle, needs instruction for correct needle placement and completion of suture placement. Able to load and handle needle appropriately. Some difficulty in finding correct depth of suture, needs instruction, needle track too deep or too shallow or bite not of ideal size. Is able to consistently perform the step with the appropriate length of bite, depth of suture and achieve the desired rotation of the eye for exposure.  
4 Conjunctival incision and dissection Is able to describe but not able to perform limbal or fornix conjunctival incision for trabeculectomy surgery. Is able to perform limbal or fornix conjunctival incision but is inefficient and requires guidance.  Has difficulty with judging appropriate length of incision, dissection down to sclera of both conjunctiva and Tenon’s and the necessary force to apply to the tissue.  Has difficulty avoiding damage to the superior rectus muscle with limbal-based conjunctival flap. Is able to perform limbal or fornix conjunctival incisions but is inefficient or tentative and requires guidance with technique and/or position and size of incision. Performs conjunctival incision without creating buttonholes and with no disruption of adjacent tissues. Incision is of correct size (i.e. enough to give proper exposure for performance of posterior subTenon’s dissection and formation of scleral flap.  
5 Hemostasis Is unable to describe the need for hemostasis, type of cautery required, appropriate technique. Is unable to perform. Is able to describe the need for hemostasis, type of cautery required, appropriate technique. Has difficulty performing proper technique. Is able to apply cautery but has difficulty with scleral burns, shrinkage of tissue, obtaining hemostasis. Is able to efficiently and precisely apply hemostasis without significant scleral burns, shrinkage of tissues and obtains hemostasis. Understands advantages and disadvantages of different types of cautery tips.  


6

Application of antimetabolite Is unable to accurately describe role of antimetabolites in trabeculectomy, types of antimetabolites and the relative indication for use of each type, safety considerations and use of pledget material. Is able to accurately describe role of antimetabolites in trabeculectomy, types of antimetabolites and the relative indication for use of each type, safety considerations and use of pledget material. Needs guidance for choice of anti-metabolite and exposure time. Needs guidance for fashioning of sponges. Inefficient or inappropriate placement of sponges. Needs to be reminded to keep surgical count. Does not protect conjunctival edge. Inefficient removal of sponges and /or irrigation. Is able to safely apply antimetabolite onto eye but may have difficulty creating pledget material to appropriate size and thickness. Appropriately discards materials into toxic waste and rinses eye of residual antimetabolite material. Is able to safely, efficiently and accurately, apply antimetabolite onto eye and has no difficulty creating pledget material to appropriate size and thickness. Appropriately discards materials into toxic waste and thoroughly rinses eye of residual antimetabolite material. Keeps surgical count of pledgets used.


 
7 Creation of scleral flap Is unable to describe dissection technique for flap creation. Is able to describe dissection technique for flap creation but requires constant guidance to perform the basic steps. Needs reminding to grasp sclera outside flap construction area. Is able to perform basic flap creation but is inefficient and/or creates flaps that may be too thin, deep, small, or posterior or at risk of avulsion. Is able to efficiently create flap to the appropriate size and depth without constant guidance.

Able to describe the complications and management of faulty scleral flap creation including buttonholing and avulsion of the flap.

 
8 Paracentesis Puts anterior lens capsule or iris at risk when entering anterior chamber Inappropriate incision architecture, location, and size. Needs instruction on how to perform. Leakage and/or iris prolapse with local pressure, provides poor surgical access. Incision not in correct position or leaks. Incision parallel to iris, self-sealing, adequate size, provides good access for surgical maneuvering.  
9 (a) Sclerostomy (with Kelly punch) Has difficulty with entry into anterior chamber, either ineffective or trauma to ocular tissue. Uncontrolled entry into AC. Difficulty using Kelly punch. Is able to create an entry plane into anterior chamber but has significant difficulty with using Kelly punch. Damages scleral flap. Makes sclerostomy too large /small or too anterior/posterior for appropriate filtration. Is able to use the Kelly punch, but may be prone to creating a shelving wound with the punch. Makes sclerostomy too large or too small for appropriate filtration. Is able to create an appropriate entry plane into the anterior chamber and is able to use Kelly punch with dexterity. Sclerostomy appropriate size for filtration.  
9 (b) Sclerostomy (without Kelly punch) Needs constant direction. Size of sclerostomy inappropriate or not in correct position Difficulty outlining and dissecting deep scleral flap. There may be damage to surrounding tissues. Able to outline deep scleral flap and perform dissection, but has difficulty performing this smoothly, needs direction, unable to cleanly remove deeper scleral tissue. Outlines deep scleral flap with ease, dissects flap sclera from underyling tissue without trauma to other structures, excises deep scleral flap cleanly. Deep scleral flap/ sclerostomy of appropriate size and correctly positioned. Avoids damage to the underlying ciliary body.  
10 Peripheral iridectomy (PI) Cannot grasp iris tissue, damages surrounding structures. Needs direction in grasping iris tissue and performing iridectomy. Unable to control size of PI. Able to grasp iris tissue without damage to intraocular structures, but PI either too large or too small. May need more than one attempt Able to grasp iris tissue without damage to surrounding structures, PI is of correct size.  
11 Scleral flap suturing Instruction is required and stitches are placed in an awkward, slow fashion with multiple passes to sclera or tear of flap, bends needles, incomplete suture rotation. Stitches are placed with some difficulty, re-suturing may be needed, instruction needed. Difficulty achieving proper IOP at end of case. Stitches are placed with minimal difficulty; tight enough to achieve wound closure and allow for appropriate filtration. Stitches are placed with correct tension to allow for appropriate filtration. Able to place both fixed and releasable sutures proficiently. Appropriate final IOP.  
12 Anterior chamber reformation Cannot cannulate anterior chamber via paracentesis. Unable to assess whether anterior chamber of appropriate depth. Unable to assess whether IOP is satisfactory to proceed to next step. Has difficulty cannulating anterior chamber via paracentesis to reform anterior chamber. Needs guidance. Cannulates anterior chamber with ease to reform anterior chamber, but has difficulty assessing ideal AC depth/IOP. Cannulates AC with ease and is able to assess correct AC depth/ IOP for eye  
13 Conjunctival closure Is unable to close conjunctiva. Unable to differentiate Tenon’s capsule from conjunctiva. Is able to perform basic conjunctival closure technique but is inefficient and requires significant guidance. Additional sutures are required. Significant bleb leak at the end of surgery with unstable, shallow anterior chamber. May have buttonhole of conjunctiva. Is able to safely close conjunctiva with good tissue approximation but is inefficient. Requires guidance to ensure closure is effective without a leak. Placement of additional sutures or replacement of loose sutures required before closure is complete and Seidel negative. Is able to safely and efficiently close conjunctiva with good tissue approximation, no bleb leak and stable anterior chamber. Has good understanding of various suture types, appropriate needles and different closure techniques.  
Global Indices
1 Maintaining hemostasis Is unable to describe types of cautery, settings for cautery and/or unable to describe electrocautery technique. Can describe techniques for avoiding and controlling bleeding but requires significant guidance to perform proper cautery to minimize bleeding. Usually applies proper tissue technique to avoid bleeding and is able to control bleeding using cautery but requires multiple attempts to cauterize and may leave burnt carbon marks. Consistently applies proper tissue technique to avoid bleeding and is able to efficiently control bleeding using cautery.  
2 Tissue handling Is excessively aggressive or timid in manipulating tissue. Inadvertent tissue damage occurs to conjunctiva or sclera. Needs direction to grasp sclera outside margins of intended scleral flap. Aware of techniques for avoidance of tissue damage and bleeding but needs supervision to accomplish proper handling.  Needs direction to grasp sclera outside margins of intended scleral flap. Conjunctival buttonholes present. Tissue handling is safe but sometimes requires multiple attempts to achieve desired manipulation of tissue.  No direction required to avoid grasping sclera within margins of intended scleral flap. Conjunctiva is intact but manipulated aggressively/unsafely e.g. toothed forceps. Tissue handling is efficient, fluid and almost always achieves desired tissue manipulation on first attempt. No conjunctival buttonholes present.  
3 Knowledge of instruments Can only identify instruments in simple terms such as “scissors” and “forceps” but no knowledge of necessary sutures or needle types. Can identify some but not most of the surgical instruments by proper names and can identify necessary suture sizes and materials but not needle types. Can identify most but not all of the surgical instruments by proper name and can identify necessary suture sizes/materials but not needle types. Can identify all surgical instruments by proper names and can identify necessary suture sizes/materials and needle types.  
4 Technique of holding suture needle in needle holder Frequently loads needle incorrectly. Loads needle in proper direction for a forehand pass but sometimes loads incorrectly for backhand pass. Loads too close or too far from the swaged end of the needle. Loads needle properly for forehand and backhand needle pass but is inefficient and often requires multiple attempts. Loads needle properly and efficiently for forehand and backhand needle passes.  
5 Technique of surgical knot tying Unable to tie knots. Require multiple extra hand maneuvers to make first throw lay flat and/or loosens first throw while attempting to perform the second throw. Is able to tie a flat surgeon’s knot first throw but second and third throws are inefficient. Does not inadvertently loosen the first throw. Is able to efficiently tie a flat, square surgeon’s knot.  
6 Communication with surgical team Does not know role of surgical team members. Lacks confidence or has too much. Does not establish good rapport with team. Unable to request instruments from scrub nurse using proper instrument and suture names and/or instructions to surgical assistant are vague or nonexistent. Knows role of most surgical team members. Lacks confidence. Has difficulty establishing good rapport with team members. Able to request most instruments from scrub nurse using proper instrument and suture names but instructions to surgical assistant are inadequate to perform procedure safely. Knows role of each surgical team member. Is somewhat confident and usually treats team with respect. Establishes good working relationship. Able to request most instruments from scrub nurse using proper instrument and suture names in correct order. Instructions to surgical assistant are adequate for a skilled assistant but inadequate for an unskilled assistant. Knows role of each surgical team member. Is confident and treats team with respect. Establishes good working relationship. Able to efficiently request instruments from scrub nurse using proper names in correct order. Able to consistently give clear instructions to surgical assistant. Communicates with anesthetist, if present.  


Overall difficulty of procedure (circle):           Simple             Intermediate                Difficult


Good points: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Suggestions for development: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Agreed action: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Signature of Assessor: ___________________________________        Signature of Trainee: ____________________________________The COECSA PAEDIATRIC CATARACT-OSCAR

The COECSA PAEDIATRIC CATARACT-OSCAR

This should be completed at the end of the case and immediately discussed with the student to provide timely, structured, specific performance feedback. Circle the appropriate cells and if previous PAED CAT-OSCARS are available review them in order to develop a plan for improvement

COECSA PAEDIATRIC CATARACT SURGERY-Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubric (COECSA PAED CAT-OSCAR)
Date ______

Resident ___________

Evaluator __________

Novice

(score = 2)

Beginner

(score = 3)

Advanced Beginner

(score = 4)

Competent

(score = 5)

Not applicable. Done by consultant or senior resident (score= 0)
1 Draping: Unable to start draping without help. Drapes with minimal verbal instruction. Incomplete lash coverage. Lashes mostly covered, drape at most minimally obstructing view. Lashes completely covered and clear of incision site, drape not obstructing the view.
2 Incision (corneal or corneo-scleral) &Paracentesis: Formation& Technique Inappropriate incision architecture, location, and size. Leakage and/or iris prolapse with local pressure, provides poor surgical access to and visibility of capsule and bag. Incision either valvular or of good internal length not both. Incision parallel to iris, valvular and of good internal length provides good access for surgical maneuvering.


Staining of the anterior capsule

Unsure about the technique of injecting 0.1%Trypan Blue dye, the amount to be injected and the waiting time before washing off the dye to stain the anterior capsule. Knows the technique but requires instruction on injecting, waiting time. Anterior chamber fluctuates while injecting the dye. Does not use sterile air to protect the corneal endothelium. Administers incorrect amount or washes off the dye too quickly. Requires no instruction. Uses adequate sterile air bubble to protect the corneal endothelium. Administers adequate amount and waits for adequate time. Washes off the dye with saline a little too early causing improper and patchy staining of the capsule. May cause endothelial staining due to excess trypan or inadequate air bubble. Administers adequate amount. . Uses adequate sterile air bubble to protect the corneal endothelium Waits for one minute and or wait for the dye to stain the anterior capsule uniformly and then washes away the dye with saline. The anterior chamber remains stable during the whole process. There is no staining of the corneal endothelium.
4 Viscoelastic:

Appropriate Use and Safe Insertion  

Unsure of when, what type and how much OVDto use. Has difficulty accessing anterior chamber through paracentesis.

.

Requires minimal instruction. Knows when to use but administers incorrect amount or type. Requires no instruction. Uses at appropriate time. Administers adequate amount and type. Cannula tip in good position. Unsure of correct OVD if multiple types available. OVDs are administered in appropriate amount and at the appropriate time with cannula tip clear of lens capsule and endothelium. Appropriate OVDs used if multiple types of OVD are available.  
5 Anterior Capsulorrhexis: Commencement of Flap& follow-through. With Forceps: Instruction required, tentative, chases rather than controls rhexis, lens matter disruption may occur.

With Vitrector: Instruction required for initiation of capsulorrhexis, unsure of vitrectomy settings, anterior chamber (AC) fluctuates frequently.

With Forceps: Minimal instruction, predominantly in control with occasional loss of control of rhexis, lens matter disruption may occur.

With Vitrector: Minimal instruction needed, has knowledge of machine settings for capsulotomy, AC is stable throughout.

With Forceps: In control, few awkward or repositioning movements, no lens matter disruption.

With Vitrector:  In control, No lens matter disruption or AC fluctuation, Few awkward movements noticed.

With Forceps: Delicate approach and confident control of the rhexis, no lens matter disruption.

With Vitrector:  Has a sound knowledge of vitrector machine settings for capsulotomy, well controlled initiation and completion of rhexis.

 
6 Anterior Capsulorrhexis:

Formation and Circular Completion

With Forceps or vitrector: Size and position are inadequate for a paediatric cataract. With Forceps or vitrector: Size and position are barely adequate, difficulty achieving circular rhexis, tear may occur. With Forceps or vitrector: Size and position are almost exact, shows control, and requires only minimal instruction. Nearly all of the optic edge covered by the capsule edge. With Forceps or vitrector: Adequate size (5-6 mm) and position for paediatric cataract, no tears, rapid, unaided control of radialization, maintains control of the flap and AC depth throughout the capsulorrhexis.


7 Hydrodissection: Hydrodissection fluid not injected in sufficient quantity or place to achieve desired displacement of the soft nucleus. Unaware of contraindications to hydrodissection such as posterior polar cataract or a suspected pre-existing posterior capsule dehiscence. Multiple attempts required to achieve the desired displacement of the soft nucleus. Fluid injected in appropriate location, has sound knowledge of contraindications to hydrodissection. Adequate if free nuclear rotation with minimal resistance is achieved or adequate separation of nucleus and epinucleus from the cortex is obtained. Aware of contraindications to hydrodissection.  
8(a) Aspiration Probe and Second Instrument: Insertion Into Eye Has great difficulty inserting the probe or second instrument, AC collapses, may damage wound, capsule or Descemet’s membrane Inserts the probe or second instrument after some failed attempts, may damage wound, capsule or Descemet’s membrane. Inserts probe and second instrument on first attempt with mild difficulty, no damage to wound, capsule or Descemet’s membrane. Smoothly inserts instruments into the eye without damaging the wound or Descemet's membrane.  
8(b) Aspiration Probe and Second Instrument: Effective Use and Stability Tip frequently not visible, has much difficulty keeping the eye in primary position and uses excessive force to do so. Tip often not visible, often requires manipulation to keep eye in primary position.

 

Maintains visibility of tip at most times, eye is generally kept in primary position with mild depression or pulling on the globe. Maintains visibility of instrument tips at all times, keeps the eye in primary position without depressing or pulling up the globe.  
9


Management of Lens: Aspiration Technique

Great difficulty in aspirating the nucleus, introducing the tip under the capsulorrhexis border, position of aspiration hole not controlled, cannot regulate aspiration flow as needed, cannot peel cortical material adequately, and engages capsule or iris with aspiration port. Moderate difficulty introducing aspiration tip under capsulorrhexis and maintaining hole up position, attempts to aspirate without occluding tip, shows poor comprehension of aspiration dynamics, cortical peeling is not well controlled, jerky and slow, capsule potentially compromised. Prolonged attempts result in minimal residual cortical material. Minimal difficulty introducing the aspiration tip under the capsulorrhexis, aspiration hole usually up, cortex well engaged for 360 degrees, cortical peeling slow, few technical errors, minimal residual cortical material. Aspiration tip is introduced into the nucleus to aspirate and then under the free border of the capsulorrhexis in irrigation mode with the aspiration hole up, Aspiration is activated in just enough flow as to occlude the tip, efficiently removes all cortex, The cortical material is peeled gently towards the center of the pupil, tangentially in cases of zonular weakness
10


Primary Posterior Capsulorrhexis (PPC) initiation

Tentative, needs instructions, unable to clearly visualize the posterior capsule.


With Forceps: Not sure if a nick has been made in the posterior capsule. Unable to grasp the lifted posterior capsule with forceps.


With Vitrector: Struggles while making a sclerotomy site and inserting the irrigating cannula, Anterior chamber (AC) keeps fluctuating. Wrong site for initiating posterior capsulotomy.

Requires minimal instructions


With Forceps: Able to clearly appreciate the posterior capsule and nick made with a cystitome and initiate PPC, moderate vitreous disturbance. Able to grasp the posterior capsule with minimal difficulty.


With Vitrector: Needs minimal instructions while deciding the site and technique of sclerotomy, AC remains stable. Site of initiating the capsulotomy is correct.

With Forceps: In control, few awkward movements while making the nick and trying to grasp the posterior capsule, no vitreous disruption.


With Vitrector: Performs proper sclerotomy and inserts infusion cannula with ease, AC does not fluctuate, visualizes the vitrector probe in the centre before starting capsulotomy, requires minimal instructions for initiating capsulotomy.

With Forceps: Able to grasp the posterior capsule with ease and at will. Delicate approach and confident control of the rhexis, no vitreous disruption.

With Vitrector: Understands the difference in surgical anatomy of pars plana for age, makes a proper sclerotomy at the desired distance with an MVR blade, properly places the infusion port to maintain the AC, Starts posterior capsulotomy from the centre.

11


Primary Posterior Capsulorrhexis(PPC) formation and completion

With Forceps: Poor control when proceeding with the capsulotomy. Vitreous disturbance occurs. Inadequate size and position of PPC.


With Vitrector: Does not have knowledge of machine settings while performing capsulotomy and vitrectomy. Improper technique and inadequate size of capsulotomy. Peripheral extension of posterior capsular tear may occur.

With Forceps: predominantly in control with occasional loss of control of rhexis. Size and position are barely adequate, difficulty achieving circular rhexis, tear may occur.


With Vitrector: Moderate difficulty in performing capsulotomy and vitrectomy, unable to decide if size of capsulotomy is adequate. Knowledge on machine settings not complete. Difficulty in achieving circular rhexis and may cause peripheral tears.

With Forceps: Able to proceed and complete capsulotomy with minimal instructions. Size and position are almost exact, shows good control. Needs minimal instructions if capsulotomy starts extending peripherally. Able to use appropriate OVD to help facilitate PPC at appropriate stage



With Vitrector: Able to perform adequate capsulotomy with ease. Has a sound knowledge on the change in settings while performing capsulotomy. Needs minimal instructions if capsulotomy starts extending peripherally.

With Forceps: Adequate size and position for age, no tears, rapid, unaided control of radialization, maintains control throughout. Able to manage independently if posterior capsulotomy starts extending peripherally. Able to use appropriate OVD to help facilitate PPC at appropriate stage


With Vitrector: Adequate size (4-5 mm) and position for age, no tears. Has a sound knowledge on the change in settings while performing capsulotomy. Able to manage independently if posterior capsulotomy starts extending peripherally.

12


Anterior Vitrectomy

Needs Instruction, Difficulty in appreciating vitreous in anterior chamber or the bag, Technique of holding the bimanual irrigation cannula and vitrector is wrong, not sure of settings for vitrectomy. May cut the posterior capsule inadvertently. Requires minimal instructions, holds the vitrector properly, minimal fluctuation in the anterior chamber during vitrectomy, able to appreciate the presence of vitreous. Unable to perform complete vitrectomy, stays too anterior in vitreous cavity. May cut the posterior capsule inadvertently. Performs anterior vitrectomy with control, able to clear the anterior and posterior chamber free of vitreous but unable to judge if adequate vitrectomy has been performed, maintains the anterior chamber during vitrectomy. Maintains the posterior Capsulorrhexis margins intact. Peaking of posterior capsule due to inadequate vitrectomy may be noted. Knows the goals of performing anterior vitrectomy in paediatric age. Knows the end point of complete anterior vitrectomy, Anterior and posterior chamber completely cleared of vitreous, adequate depth of vitrectomy performed in vitreous cavity all around the posterior Capsulorrhexis. Maintains the anterior chamber throughout.
13


IOL Insertion, Rotation, and Final Position of Intraocular Lens

Unable to insert IOL, unable to produce adequate incision for implant FOLDABLE:   unable to load IOL into injector or forceps, no control of lens injection, doesn't control tip placement, lens is not in the capsular bag or is injected upside down. Insertion and manipulation of IOL is difficult, eye handled roughly, anterior chamber not stable, repeated attempts result in borderline incision for implant type FOLDABLE:  difficulty loading IOL into  injector or forceps, hesitant, poor control of lens injection, difficulty controlling tip placement, excessive manipulation required to get both haptics into capsular bag. Insertion and manipulation of IOL is accomplished with minimal anterior chamber instability, incision just adequate for implant FOLDABLE:  minimal difficulty loading IOL into injector of forceps, hesitant but good control of lens injection, minimal difficulty controlling tip placement,  both haptics are in the capsular bag. Insertion and manipulation of IOL is performed in a deep and stable anterior chamber and capsular bag, with incision appropriate for implant type. FOLDABLE: Able to load IOL into injector or forceps, lens is injected in a controlled fashion, fixation of IOL is symmetric; the optic and both haptics are inside the capsular bag.  
14 Wound Closure (Including Suturing, Hydration, and Checking Security as Required) When suturing is needed, instruction is required and stitches are placed in an awkward, slow fashion with much difficulty, astigmatism, bent needles, incomplete suture rotation and wound leakage may result, unable to remove OVDs thoroughly. Unable to make incision water tight or does not check wound for seal.  Improper final chamber depth IOP When suturing is needed, stitches are placed with some difficulty, resuturing may be needed, questionable wound closure with probable astigmatism, instruction may be needed, questionable whether all viscoelastics are thoroughly removed, Extra manoeuvres are required to make the incision water tight at the end of the surgery. May have improper IOP. When suturing is needed, stitches are placed with minimal difficulty tight enough to maintain the wound closed, may have slight astigmatism, viscoelastics are adequately removed after this step with some difficulty, The incision is checked and is water tight or needs minimal adjustment at the end of the surgery. May have improper IOP. When suturing is needed, stitches are placed tight enough to maintain the wound closed, but not too tight as to induce astigmatism, OVDs are adequately removed, and the incision is checked and is water tight at the end of the surgery. Proper final IOP.  
Global Indices
15 Wound Neutrality and minimizing Eye Rolling and Corneal Distortion Nearly constant eye movement and corneal distortion. Eye often not in primary position, frequent distortion folds. Eye usually in primary position, mild corneal distortion folds occur. The eye is kept in primary position during the surgery. No distortion folds are produced. The length and location of incisions prevents distortion of the cornea.  
16 Use of dilating agents and devices Does not have knowledge of dilating agents or devices Has a good knowledge of dilating agents or devices but unsure of dose and technique. Has adequate knowledge of dilating agents, of dose and devices but needs minimal instructions while usage Has adequate knowledge of dilating agents, of dose and devices. Needs no instructions while performing the technique.
17 Eye Positioned Centrally Within Microscope View Constantly requires repositioning. Occasional repositioning required. Mild fluctuation in pupil position. The pupil is kept centered during the surgery.  
18 Conjunctival and corneal Tissue Handling Tissue handling is rough and damage occurs. Tissue handling borderline, minimal damage occurs. Tissue handling decent but potential for damage exists. Tissue is not damaged nor at risk by handling.  
19 Intraocular Spatial Awareness Instruments often in contact with capsule, iris and corneal endothelium, Occasional accidental contact with capsule, iris and corneal endothelium. Rare accidental contact with capsule, iris and corneal endothelium No accidental contact with capsule, iris and corneal endothelium, when appropriate,  
20 Iris Protection Iris constantly at risk, handled roughly. Iris occasionally at risk. Needs help in deciding when and how to use hooks, ring or other methods of iris protection. Iris generally well protected. Slight difficulty with iris hooks, ring, or other methods of iris protection. Iris is uninjured. Iris hooks, ring, or other methods are used as needed to protect the iris.  
21 Overall Speed and Fluidity of Procedure Hesitant, frequent starts and stops, not at all fluid. Occasional starts and stops, inefficient and unnecessary manipulations common, case duration about 60 minutes. Occasional inefficient and/or unnecessary manipulations occur, case duration about 45 minutes. Inefficient and/or unnecessary manipulations are avoided, case duration is appropriate for case difficulty. In general, 30 minutes should be adequate.  
22 Communication with surgical team Does not know role of surgical team members. Lacks confidence or has too much. Does not establish good rapport with team. Unable to request instruments from scrub nurse using proper instrument and suture names and/or instructions to surgical assistant are vague or nonexistent. Knows role of most surgical team members. Lacks confidence. Has difficulty establishing good rapport with team members. Able to request most instruments from scrub nurse using proper instrument and suture names but instructions to surgical assistant are inadequate to perform procedure safely. Knows role of each surgical team member. Is somewhat confident and usually treats team with respect. Establishes good working relationship. Able to request most instruments from scrub nurse using proper instrument and suture names in correct order. Instructions to surgical assistant are adequate for a skilled assistant but inadequate for an unskilled assistant. Knows role of each surgical team member. Is confident and treats team with respect. Establishes good working relationship. Able to efficiently request instruments from scrub nurse using proper names in correct order. Able to consistently give clear instructions to surgical assistant.


Overall difficulty of procedure (circle):           Simple             Intermediate                Difficult


Good points: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Suggestions for development: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Agreed action: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Signature of Assessor: ___________________________________        Signature of Trainee: ____________________________________


The COECSA STRABISMUS-OSCAR

This should be completed at the end of the case and immediately discussed with the student to provide timely, structured, specific performance feedback. Circle the appropriate cells and if previous STARBISMUS-OSCARS are available review them in order to develop a plan for improvement

COECSA Strabismus -Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubric: (COECSA STRABISMUS-OSCAR)

Resident: __________________  Evaluator: ____________________                     Date: ____________



Surgical Step

Novice

(score = 2)

Beginner

(score = 3)

Advanced Beginner

(score = 4)

Competent

(score = 5)

Not applicable. Done by consultant or senior resident (score= 0)
1   Draping Is unable to prepare or drape the patient using sterile technique without instruction. Unaware of importance of identifying correct eye and muscle prior to draping. Is able to prepare and drape the patient but sterile technique is inconsistent. Difficulty attaining proper head position. Is able to consistently prepare and drape patients using sterile technique however steps are performed inefficiently. Attains proper head position. Is able to consistently and efficiently prepare and drape patients with appropriate head position.
2 Forced duction test Is unaware of forced duction testing for muscle restriction. Is familiar with the test but is unaware of its relevance, timing and is unable to perform it. Is able to state the purpose of the test and is able to perform the test at the appropriate time(s) and detect moderate to severe restriction. When appropriate, is able to consistently detect and describe all degrees of rectus muscle restriction and comment on relevance to surgical options.
3 Globe stabilization Is able to describe one method of globe stabilization but is unable to perform it. Is able to describe one method of globe stabilization but needs assistance to perform it. Is able to perform one method of globe stabilization with minimal verbal supervision. Is able to perform one method of globe stabilization without verbal supervision and with ease.
4 Conjunctival incision & Tenon’s dissection Is unable to describe limbal or fornix conjunctival incision for rectus muscle surgery. Is able to describe but not able to perform limbal or fornix conjunctival incision for rectus muscle surgery. Is able to perform limbal or fornix conjunctival incisions but is inefficient and requires guidance. Is able to efficiently perform either limbal or fornix conjunctival incision.
5 Hooking rectus muscle Is unable to describe proper technique of hooking the muscle and is unable to perform technique. Is able to describe proper technique but unable to hook muscle on first attempt. Usually hooks the muscle on first attempt but is inefficient. Is able to efficiently and precisely hook the muscle on first attempt.
6 Exposure of rectus muscle Is unable to describe proper dissection technique to expose rectus muscle. Is able to describe dissection technique for muscle exposure but requires constant guidance to perform the basic steps. Is able to perform basic exposure but is inefficient and/or occasionally disrupts multiple tissue planes or branches of the anterior ciliary arteries. Is able to efficiently expose muscle using a combination of sharp and blunt dissection as appropriate and avoids branches of anterior ciliary arteries.
7 Placement of suture in muscle Is unable to accurately describe muscle suture technique. Is able to describe muscle suture technique. Multiple attempts required to load or unload the needle-holder. Suture placement inaccurate. Requires assistance to properly place suture. Is able to safely secure muscle with suture but is inefficient. May

cause bleeding and muscle fiber cuts. Needs supervision for locking bites at two ends of muscle.

Is able to safely, efficiently and accurately secure the muscle with minimal tissue trauma without supervision.


8


Disinsertion of rectus muscle

Is unable to describe technique for rectus muscle disinsertion. Is able to describe but attempts to disinsert the muscle results in inadvertently cutting or nearly cutting the muscle suture or sclera. Is able to perform disinsertion but occasionally causes inappropriate bleeding or leaves muscle tissue attached to sclera. Requires some verbal instruction. Is able to safely and efficiently disinsert rectus muscle.
9 Use of caliper/scleral ruler Is unable to mark the sclera with calipers or does not check the caliper setting to confirm planned action or is too aggressive with indenting the sclera with caliper. Does not understand the potential discrepancy between arc-length and chord-length measurement. Is able to mark sclera with calipers or scleral ruler but measurement is often not perpendicular to the original rectus insertion. Checks caliper for correct measurement. Understands arc-length vs. chord length measurements. Is able to accurately mark sclera with calipers and/or scleral ruler but marks fade because not prepared to make needle pass. Is able to efficiently and accurately mark sclera with calipers and/or scleral ruler and is prepared to make needle pass immediately after marking sclera.
10 Reattachment of muscle:  Intrascleral needle pass. Is unable to describe safe technique for intrascleral pass. Is able to describe safe technique for intrascleral pass but does not approach the globe with needle directed tangentially or does not unlock needle holder before starting the intrascleral pass. Unable to accurately obtain correct needle depth or length. Safely approaches the globe with needle tip directed tangential to the globe. Visualizes needle tip after entering the sclera and has no difficulty exiting the sclera but intrascleral passes are frequently too short or too shallow. Minimal muscle belly sagging. Approaches the globe with needle directed tangentially and intrascleral passes are consistently of correct length and depth. No muscle belly sagging.
11 Conjunctival closure (when appropriate) Is unable to close conjunctiva. Unable to differentiate Tenon’s capsule from conjunctiva. Is able to perform basic conjunctival closure technique but is inefficient and requires significant guidance. Additional sutures are required. Is able to safely close conjunctiva with good tissue approximation but is inefficient. . Is able to safely and efficiently close conjunctiva with good tissue approximation.
Global Indices
12 Maintaining hemostasis Is unable to describe proper rectus muscle dissection, suture placement and disinsertion to avoid bleeding and/or unable to describe electrocautery technique. Can describe techniques for avoiding and controlling bleeding but requires significant guidance to perform proper dissection, suture placement, muscle disinsertion and electrocautery to minimize bleeding. Usually applies proper tissue technique to avoid bleeding and is able to control bleeding using electrocautery but requires multiple attempts to cauterize and may leave burnt carbon marks. Consistently applies proper tissue technique to avoid bleeding and is able to efficiently control bleeding using electrocautery.
13 Tissue handling Is excessively aggressive or timid in manipulating tissue. Inadvertent tissue damage occurs (including significant corneal epithelium disruption). Aware of techniques for avoidance of tissue damage and bleeding but needs supervision to accomplish proper handling. Mild corneal epithelium disruption may occur. Tissue handling is safe but sometimes requires multiple attempts to achieve desired manipulation of tissue. Minimal corneal epithelium disruption may occur. Tissue handling is efficient, fluid and almost always achieves desired tissue manipulation on first attempt.
14 Knowledge of instruments Can only identify instruments in simple terms such as “muscle hook” and “forceps” but no knowledge of necessary sutures or needle types. Can identify some but not most of the surgical instruments by proper names and can identify necessary suture sizes and materials but not needle types. Can identify most but not all of the surgical instruments by proper name and can identify necessary suture sizes/materials but not needle types. Can identify all surgical instruments by proper names and can identify necessary suture sizes/materials and needle types.
15 Technique of holding suture needle in needle holder Frequently loads needle incorrectly. Loads needle in proper direction for a forehand pass but sometimes loads incorrectly for backhand pass. Loads too close or too far from the swaged end of the needle. Loads needle properly for forehand and backhand needle pass but is inefficient and often requires multiple attempts. Loads needle properly and efficiently for forehand and backhand needle passes.
16 Technique of surgical knot tying Unable to tie knots. Require multiple extra hand maneuvers to make first throw lay flat and/or loosens first throw while attempting to perform the second throw. Is able to tie a flat surgeon’s knot first throw but second and third throws are inefficient. Does not inadvertently loosen the first throw. Is able to efficiently tie a flat, square surgeon’s knot.
17 Communication with surgical team Does not know role of surgical team members. Lacks confidence or has too much. Does not establish good rapport with team. Unable to request instruments from scrub nurse using proper instrument and suture names and/or instructions to surgical assistant are vague or nonexistent. Knows role of most surgical team members. Lacks confidence. Has difficulty establishing good rapport with team members. Able to request most instruments from scrub nurse using proper instrument and suture names but instructions to surgical assistant are inadequate to perform procedure safely. Knows role of each surgical team member. Is somewhat confident and usually treats team with respect. Establishes good working relationship. Able to request most instruments from scrub nurse using proper instrument and suture names in correct order. Instructions to surgical assistant are adequate for a skilled assistant but inadequate for an unskilled assistant. Knows role of each surgical team member. Is confident and treats team with respect. Establishes good working relationship. Able to efficiently request instruments from scrub nurse using proper names in correct order. Able to consistently give clear instructions to surgical assistant.

Overall difficulty of procedure (circle):           Simple             Intermediate                Difficult


Good points: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Suggestions for development: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Agreed action: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Signature of Assessor: ___________________________________        Signature of Trainee: ____________________________________

The COECSA PHACO-OSCAR

The COECSA PHACO-OSCAR is adapted from the ICO-OSCARs available at icoph.org/ico-oscar.  It should be completed at the end of the case and immediately discussed with the student to provide timely, structured, specific performance feedback. Circle the appropriate cells and if previous PHACO-OSCARS are available review them in order to develop a plan for improvement

COECSA PHACO-Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubric: Phacoemulsification (COECSA PHACO -OSCAR)
Date ______


Resident _______


Evaluator _______


 

Novice

(score = 2)

Beginner

(score = 3)

Advanced Beginner

(score = 4)

Competent

(score = 5)

Not applicable. Done by consultant or senior resident

(score= 0)

1 Draping: Unable to start draping without help. Drapes with minimal verbal instruction. Incomplete lash coverage. Lashes mostly covered, drape at most minimally obstructing view. Lashes completely covered and clear of incision site, drape not obstructing view.  
2 Incision & Paracentesis: Formation & Technique Inappropriate incision architecture, location, and size. Leakage and/or iris prolapse with local pressure, provides poor surgical access to and visibility of capsule and bag. Incision either well-placed or non-leaking but not both. Incision parallel to iris, self sealing, adequate size, provides good access for surgical maneuvering.  
3 Viscoelastic:

Appropriate Use and Safe Insertion  

Unsure of when, what type and how much viscoelastic to use. Has difficulty accessing anterior chamber through paracentesis.

.

Requires minimal instruction. Knows when to use but administers incorrect amount or type. Requires no instruction. Uses at appropriate time. Administers adequate amount and type. Cannula tip in good position. Unsure of correct viscoelastic if multiple types available. Viscoelastics are administered in appropriate amount and at the appropriate time with cannula tip clear of lens capsule and endothelium. Appropriate viscoelastic is used if multiple types of viscoelastics are available.  
4 Capsulorrhexis: Commencement of Flap & follow-through. Instruction required, tentative, chases rather than controls rhexis, cortex disruption may occur. Minimal instruction, predominantly in control with occasional loss of control of rhexis, cortex disruption may occur. In control, few awkward or repositioning movements, no cortex disruption. Delicate approach and confident control of the rhexis, no cortex disruption.  
5 Capsulorrhexis:

Formation and Circular Completion

Size and position are inadequate for nucleus density & type of implant, tear may occur. Size and position are barely adequate for nucleus density and implant type, difficulty achieving circular rhexis, tear may occur. Size and position are almost exact for nucleus density and implant type, shows control, requires only minimal instruction. Adequate size and position for nucleus density & type of implant, no tears, rapid, unaided control of radialization, maintains control of the flap and AC depth throughout the capsulorrhexis.  
6 Hydrodissection: Visible Fluid Wave and Free Nuclear Rotation Hydrodissection fluid not injected in quantity nor place to achieve nucleus rotation. Multiple attempts required, able to rotate nucleus somewhat but not completely. Tries to manually force rotation before adequate hydrodissection. Fluid injected in appropriate location, able to rotate nucleus but encounters more than minimal resistance. Ideally see free fluid wave but adequate if free nuclear rotation with minimal resistance is achieved. Aware of contraindications to hydrodissection.  
7 Phacoemulsification Probe and Second Instrument: Insertion Into Eye Has great difficulty inserting the probe or second instrument, AC collapses, may damage wound, capsule or Descemet’s membrane Inserts the probe or second instrument after some failed attempts, may damage wound, capsule or Descemet’s membrane. Inserts probe and second instrument on first attempt with mild difficulty, no damage to wound, capsule or Descemet’s membrane. Smoothly inserts instruments into the eye without damaging the wound or Descemet's membrane.


 
8 Phacoemulsification Probe and Second Instrument: Effective Use and Stability Tip frequently not visible, has much difficulty keeping the eye in primary position and uses excessive force to do so. Tip often not visible, often requires manipulation to keep eye in primary position.

 

Maintains visibility of tip at most times, eye is generally kept in primary position with mild depression or pulling on the globe. Maintains visibility of instrument tips at all times, keeps the eye in primary position without depressing or pulling up the globe.  
9 Nucleus:

Sculpting or Primary Chop

Frequently incorrect power used during sculpting, applies power at inappropriate times, excessive phaco probe movement causes constant eye/nucleus movement, unable to engage nucleus (chop method) or the groove is of inadequate depth or width (divide and conquer), cannot control Phacodynamics. Unable to correctly work foot pedals. Moderate error in power used while sculpting, tentative, frequent eye/nucleus movement produced by phaco tip, difficult to engage nucleus (chop technique) or groove adequately after many attempts (divide and conquer), poor control of phacodynamics with frequent anterior chamber depth fluctuations. Has difficulty working foot pedals. Uses correct power with minimal error when sculpting, occasional eye/nucleus movement caused by phaco tip, some difficulty in engaging or holding nucleus (chop method) or groove adequate  with minimal repeat attempts,  fairly good control of phacodynamics with occasional anterior chamber depth change. Minimal mistakes using foot pedals. Sculpting is performed using adequate ultrasound power regulated by the pedal, with forward movements that do not change the eye position or push the nucleus, the nucleus is safely engaged (with chop method) or the groove is appropriate in depth and width (divide and conquer technique), phacodynamics are controlled as evidenced by the internal anterior chamber environment. Adept at foot pedal control.  
10 Nucleus: Rotation and Manipulation Unable to rotate nucleus. Able to rotate nucleus partially and with zonular stress. Able to rotate nucleus fully but with zonular stress.  Nucleus is safely and efficiently manipulated producing minimal stress on zonules and globe.  
11 Nucleus: Cracking or Chopping With Safe Phacoemulsification of Segments


CRACKING: Grooves are not centered or deep enough and go into epinucleus, nucleus is constantly displaced from central position, unable to crack nucleus at all, eye constantly moving.

CHOPPING: Always endangers or engages adjacent tissue, unable to accomplish chop of any piece.

SEGMENT PHACOEMULSIFICATION: produces significant wound burn, great difficulty pursuing fragments around the anterior chamber and into the bag, poor awareness of second instrument tip and difficulty keeping the second hand instrument under the phaco tip,

CRACKING: Some grooves are centered and deep enough and some go into epinucleus, displaces nucleus in most grooves, attempts to split nucleus with instruments too shallow in groove, able to crack portion of nucleus, eye often moving.

CHOPPING: endangers or engages adjacent tissue in most chops, able to accomplish chop of some pieces.

SEGMENT PHACOEMULSIFICATION: produces light wound burn, pursues most fragments around the AC and into the bag, the second hand instrument is sometimes under the phaco tip

CRACKING: Most grooves are centered and deep enough, rarely goes into epinucleus, rarely displaces nucleus, sometimes attempts to split in mid-nucleus but succeeds, eye usually in primary position.

CHOPPING: endangers or engages adjacent tissue in some chops, able to accomplish chop of most pieces.

SEGMENT PHACOEMULSIFICATION: produces minimal wound burn, pursues some fragments around the AC and into the bag, the second hand instrument is usually under the phaco tip

CRACKING: Grooves are centered, deep enough to ensure cracking, length does not reach epinucleus, nucleus is not displaced from central position, places instruments deep enough to easily and successfully crack nucleus, eye stays in primary position.

CHOPPING: Nucleus engaged and vertical or horizontal chop technique undertaken with no inadvertent engagement of adjacent tissue (especially capsule). Full thickness nuclear chop of all pieces in a controlled and fluid manner.

SEGMENT PHACOEMULSIFICATION: No wound burns, Pieces are "floated" to the tip without "pursuing" the fragments around the anterior chamber and the bag, The second hand instrument is kept under the phaco tip to prevent posterior capsule contact if surge arises.

 
12 Irrigation and Aspiration Technique

With Adequate Removal of Cortex

Great difficulty introducing the aspiration tip under the capsulorrhexis border, aspiration hole position not controlled, cannot regulate aspiration flow as needed, cannot peel cortical material adequately, engages capsule or iris with aspiration port. Moderate difficulty introducing aspiration tip under capsulorrhexis and maintaining hole up position, attempts to aspirate without occluding tip, shows poor comprehension of aspiration dynamics, cortical peeling  is not well controlled, jerky and slow, capsule potentially compromised. prolonged attempts result in minimal residual cortical material. Minimal difficulty introducing the aspiration tip under the capsulorrhexis, aspiration hole usually up, cortex will engaged for 360 degrees, cortical peeling slow, few technical errors, minimal residual cortical material. Aspiration tip is introduced under the free border of the capsulorrhexis in irrigation mode with the aspiration hole up, Aspiration is activated in just enough flow as to occlude the tip, efficiently removes all cortex, The cortical material is peeled gently towards the center of the pupil, tangentially in cases of zonular weakness.  
13 Lens Insertion, Rotation, and Final

Position of Intraocular Lens

Unable to insert IOL, unable to produce adequate incision for implant type NON-FOLDABLE: unable to place the lower haptic in the capsular bag, unable to rotate the upper haptic into place FOLDABLE:   unable to load IOL into injector or forcep, no control of lens injection, doesn't control tip placement, lens is not in the capsular bag or is injected upside down. Insertion and manipulation of IOL is difficult, eye handled roughly, anterior chamber  not stable, repeated attempts result in borderline incision for implant type NON-FOLDABLE: repeated hesitant attempts result in lower haptic in the capsular bag, upper haptic is rotated into place but with excessive force on capsulorrhexis and zonules and repeated attempts are necessary FOLDABLE:  difficulty loading IOL into  injector or forcep,, hesitant, poor control of lens injection, difficulty controlling tip placement, excessive manipulation required to get both haptics into capsular bag. Insertion and manipulation of IOL is accomplished with minimal anterior chamber instability, incision just adequate for implant type NON-FOLDABLE: the lower haptic is placed inside the capsular bag with some difficulty, upper haptic is rotated into place with some stress on the capsulorrhexis and zonule fibers FOLDABLE: , minimal difficulty loading IOL into injector of forcep, hesitant but good control of lens injection, minimal difficulty controlling tip placement,  both haptics are in the capsular bag. Insertion and manipulation of IOL is performed in a deep and stable anterior chamber and capsular bag, with incision appropriate for implant type.  NON-FOLDABLE: The lower haptic is smoothly placed inside the capsular bag; the upper haptic is rotated into place without exerting excessive stress to the capsulorrhexis or the zonule fibers.  FOLDABLE: Able to load IOL into injector or forcep, lens is injected in a controlled fashion, fixation of IOL is symmetric; the optic and both haptics are inside the capsular bag.   
14 Wound Closure (Including Suturing, Hydration, and Checking Security as Required) If suturing is needed, instruction is required and stitches are placed in an awkward, slow fashion with much difficulty, astigmatism, bent needles, incomplete suture rotation and wound leakage may result, unable to remove viscoelastics thoroughly. unable to make incision water tight or does not check wound for seal.  Improper final IOP. If suturing is needed, stitches are placed with some difficulty, resuturing may be needed, questionable wound closure with probable astigmatism, instruction may be needed, questionable whether all viscoelastics are thoroughly removed, Extra maneuvers are required to make the incision water tight at the end of the surgery. May have improper IOP. If suturing is needed, stitches are placed with minimal difficulty  tight enough to maintain the wound closed, may have slight astigmatism, viscoelastics are adequately removed after this step with some difficulty, The incision is checked and is water tight or needs minimal adjustment at the end of the surgery. May have improper IOP. If suturing is needed, stitches are placed tight enough to maintain the wound closed, but not too tight as to induce astigmatism, viscoelastics are thoroughly removed after this step, the incision is checked and is water tight at the end of the surgery.  Proper final IOP.  
Global Indices


15 Wound Neutrality and Minimizing Eye Rolling and Corneal Distortion Nearly constant eye movement and corneal distortion. Eye often not in primary position, frequent distortion folds. Eye usually in primary position, mild corneal distortion folds occur. The eye is kept in primary position during the surgery. No distortion folds are produced. The length and location of incisions prevents distortion of the cornea.  
16 Eye Positioned Centrally Within Microscope View Constantly requires repositioning. Occasional repositioning required. Mild fluctuation in pupil position. The pupil is kept centered during the surgery.  
17 Conjunctival and Corneal Tissue Handling Tissue handling is rough and damage occurs. Tissue handling borderline, minimal damage occurs. Tissue handling decent but potential for damage exists. Tissue is not damaged nor at risk by handling.  
18 Intraocular Spatial Awareness instruments often in contact with capsule, iris and corneal endothelium’, blunt second hand instrument not kept in appropriate position. Occasional accidental contact with capsule, iris and corneal endothelium, sometimes has blunt second hand instrument between the posterior capsule and the activated phaco tip. Rare accidental contact with capsule, iris and corneal endothelium. Often has blunt second hand instrument between the posterior capsule and the activated phaco tip. No accidental contact with capsule, iris and corneal endothelium, when appropriate, a blunt, second hand instrument, is always kept between the posterior capsule and the tip of the phaco when the phaco is activated.  
19 Iris Protection Iris constantly at risk, handled roughly. Iris occasionally at risk. Needs help in deciding when and how to use hooks, ring or other methods of iris protection. Iris generally well protected. Slight difficulty with iris hooks, ring, or other methods of iris protection. Iris is uninjured. Iris hooks, ring, or other methods are used as needed to protect the iris.  
20 Overall Speed and Fluidity of Procedure Hesitant, frequent starts and stops, not at all fluid. Occasional starts and stops, inefficient and unnecessary manipulations common, case duration about 60 minutes. Occasional inefficient and/or unnecessary manipulations occur, case duration about 45 minutes. Inefficient and/or unnecessary manipulations are avoided, case duration is appropriate for case difficulty. In general, 30 minutes should be adequate.  

Overall difficulty of procedure (circle):           Simple             Intermediate                Difficult


Good points: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Suggestions for development: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Agreed action: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Signature of Assessor: ___________________________________        Signature of Trainee: ____________________________________


Rubric for ocex
Rubric for   OCEX                                                                                                        OCEX Scoring Rubric
1

Does not meet

2

Meets some expectations

3

Meets all expectations

4

Exceeds Expectations

Interview Skills
Introduction Does not introduce him/her self Introduces self as Dr. not as resident Introduces self as resident physician Introduces self to patient & family and shakes hands
Chief Complaint Does not elicit a CC Elicits CC but lacks relevant details. Elicits CC & details Elicits CC and subtle, relevant details
HPI Does not elicit HPI HPI lacks relevant details HPI includes most important details HPI includes all relevant details
Pertinent Negatives Does not elicit pertinent negatives Elicits some pertinent negatives Elicits important pertinent negatives Elicits even subtle pertinent negatives
Pain Inquiry Does not elicit. Pain is elicited, not characterized Elicits scaled rating of pain (0-10) Elicits scaled rating/ relieving/exacerbating

factors

Allergies Does not elicit. Elicits medical allergies without symptom detail Elicits medical allergies with symptom detail Elicits medical & environmental allergies/symptoms
ROS Does not elicit. Elicits incomplete ROS Elicits most important items in ROS Leaves no stone unturned
Medication List Does not elicit. Obtains list, no dosages/frequency Obtains list with dosages/frequency Obtains list of meds/ & herbal remedies
Social History Does not elicit. Omits important details Obtains important details Elicits even subtle relevant details
Family History Does not elicit. Omits important details Obtains important details Obtains subtle relevant details of family tree
Hand Washing Does not wash hands. Washes his/her hands, no soap Washes hands with soap Washes hands before and after encounter
Exam
Visual Acuity Does not check Checks, but not best corrected Checks best corrected Does additional, appropriate testing relevant

to patient’s history/exam

Pupils Does not check Checks light reaction, does not

swing light

Checks light reaction and for RAPD Does additional, appropriate testing relevant

to patient’s history/exam

Visual Field Does not check Confrontational VF done but

incompletely

Confrontational visual fields done

correctly

Does additional, appropriate testing relevant

to patient’s history/exam

Motility Does not check Checks ductions or versions Checks ductions / versions and alignment

in primary position

Does additional, appropriate testing relevant

to patient’s history/exam

External Does not check Observes without measurements Checks lid fissures & for proptosis Does additional, appropriate testing relevant

to patient’s history/exam

SLE Does not check Doesn’t check all depths of AC and/or checks only 1 eye Checks both eyes, entire anterior segment Does additional, appropriate testing relevant to patient’s history/exam
IOP Does not check Poor applanation technique Checks IOP correctly OU Does additional, appropriate testing relevant

to patient’s history/exam

Fundus Does not check Indirect or slit lamp biomicroscopy Indirect and slit lamp biomicroscopy Does additional appropriate testing relevant

to patient’s history/exam

Interpersonal Skills
1

Does not meet

2

Meets some expectations

3

Meets all expectations

4

Exceeds all expectations


Respectful


Disrespectful

Curt, does not listen to all of patient’s questions/concerns Listens to patient, responds to patient questions/concerns Extremely attentive to patient’s questions, concerns


Understandable

Constantly uses medical jargon the

patient doesn’t understand


Occasionally uses medical jargon the patient doesn’t understand


Avoids or explains medical terms when used

Avoids or explains medical terms when used and frequently asks whether they are understood
Explained Findings


No explanation


Cursory explanation


Thoroughly explained all pertinent findings

Thoroughly explained all findings and used models/photos
Explained Diagnosis


No explanation


Cursory explanation


Thoroughly explained diagnosis

Thoroughly explained diagnosis and used models/photos
Explained Plan No explanation Cursory explanation Thoroughly explained plan Thoroughly explained plan and scheduled tests
Asked if Patient Had Questions.


Does not ask

Asked if patient had questions but didn’t answer completely Asked if patient had questions and answered questions thoroughly Asked if patient & family had questions. And answered thoroughly. Gave phone # for

patient to call with questions

Case Presentation
Concise/Clarity Unintelligible Somewhat Disorganized Clear, concise, organized Meticulous, exact, succinct but complete


Pertinent Facts


Omits pertinent facts


Omits minor supporting facts


Covers all pertinent facts

Covers all pertinent facts and omits all irrelevant data
Pertinent Positives & Negatives


Does not mention


Mentions some pertinent positives & negatives


Covers all pertinent positives & negatives


Covers all pertinent positives & negatives, and omits irrelevant data

Differential Diagnosis


Does not mention

Provides basic but incomplete differential Dx


Provides appropriate differential Dx


Exhaustive differential Dx and cites literature


Appropriate Plan


Does not mention


Provides basic but incomplete plan


Provides appropriate plan


Provides detailed plan and cites literature

Response to

Attending

Inappropriate Listens but little response Listens and responds appropriately Responds appropriately and cites relevant

literature

Coecsa-ocex

COECSA Ophthalmic Clinical Evaluation Exercise (COECSA-OCEX)


The OCEX is an observed encounter between a resident and a new patient. The evaluator should be present in the exam room for the entire interaction. The intent is to rate the resident in all the categories listed below compared to a graduating resident and then provide immediate performance feedback. The rating system is:

    1 -  Does Not Meet Expectations     2 – Meets Some Expectations       3 - Meets All Expectations

                     4 – Exceeds Expectations                   na -  Not Applicable

Elicits medical & environmental allergies/symptoms Elicits medical & environmental allergies/symptoms

Interview Skills
1. Introduced self 1 2 3 4 na 7. Review of systems 1 2 3 4 na
2. Obtained chief complaint 1 2 3 4 na 8. Med list 1 2 3 4 na
3. History of present illness 1 2 3 4 na 9. Past medical history 1 2 3 4 na
4. Pertinent negatives 1 2 3 4 na 10. Social history 1 2 3 4 na
5. Pain inquiry 1 2 3 4 na 11. Family history 1 2 3 4 Na
6. Allergies 1 2 3 4 na 12. Washed hands 1 2 3 4 Na
Examination
1. Best corrected Va 1 2 3 4 na 5. External 1 2 3 4 na
2. Pupils / RAPD 1 2 3 4 na 6. SLE 1 2 3 4 na
3. Visual Fields 1 2 3 4 na 7. IOP (+/- gonioscopy) 1 2 3 4 na
4. Motility 1 2 3 4 na 8. Funduscopy 1 2 3 4 na
Interpersonal Skills / Professionalism
1. Empathetic 1 2 3 4 na 5. Explained diagnosis 1 2 3 4 na
2. Respectful & courteous 1 2 3 4 na 6. Explained plan/options 1 2 3 4 na
3. Used language the pt

Understands

1 2 3 4 na 7. Asked if patient had

questions

1 2 3 4 na
4. Explained findings 1 2 3 4 na
Case Presentation
1. Concise & clear 1 2 3 4 na 4. Appropriate differential Dx 1 2 3 4 na
2. Pertinent facts 1 2 3 4 na 5. Appropriate plan 1 2 3 4 na
3. Pertinent pos & negs 1 2 3 4 na 6. Response to attending’s

questions/suggestions

1 2 3 4 na

Comments:                                                                                                                                                                    

                                                                                                                                                                                       

                                                                                                                                                                               


We have reviewed this OCEX together.                 Resident initials:                        Date:          


Evaluator initials: