Difference between revisions of "COECSA RESIDENCY CURRICULUM"
| Line 4,459: | Line 4,459: | ||
'''Signature of assessor: Signature of trainee:''' | '''Signature of assessor: Signature of trainee:''' | ||
| − | ===== Clinical Rating Scale CRS2 (Outcome CA2: ASSESS Vision) ===== | + | ====== Clinical Rating Scale CRS2 (Outcome CA2: ASSESS Vision) ====== |
Revision as of 14:19, 14 December 2020
PREAMBLE
INTRODUCTION
The College of Ophthalmology of Eastern, Central and Southern Africa (COECSA) is a specialized virtual college. The college was registered in 2012 after a successful merger between the Eastern Africa College of Ophthalmologists (EACO) and the Ophthalmological Society of Eastern Africa (OSEA). The aim of this college is to address the chronic shortage of ophthalmologists in Eastern, Central and Southern Africa (ECSA) as well as improve the quality of eye care services in the region. The institution is anchored within the Vision 2020 framework developed under the aegis of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Agency for Prevention of Blindness (IAPB). Its establishment was informed by similar initiatives including the Medical Colleges in South Africa and the United Kingdom. However, COECSA aims to address the unique needs ECSA region based on evidence and priorities identified in the region. COECSA’s geographic focus is the ECSA region comprising Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Rwanda, Burundi, Malawi, Ethiopia, Zambia, South Sudan, Zimbabwe, Somalia and Mozambique. COECSA works closely with other players in eye health and allied sectors in making interventions in the region.
Vision
Eye health for all in Eastern, Central and Southern Africa.
Mission
To improve the quality of eye care through training, research and advocacy; provide leadership in eye care; and create a forum for exchange of ophthalmic skills, knowledge and resources in Eastern, Central and Southern Africa.
Scope of COECSA’s work
COECSA’s work is derived from its mission. The College acts as the voice of the profession in the region, tasked to set the curriculum and examinations for trainee ophthalmologists, provide training in ophthalmology, set and maintain standards in the practice of ophthalmology and promote research and advance science in the specialty. COECSA is not a regulatory body and does not have a role in disciplinary actions relating to ophthalmologists. COECSA does not offer advice to patients on their individual condition or treatment options.
COECSA’s Mandate
COECSA operates within the wider environment of health in the region. However, eye health remains an obscure footnote in the health agenda. More often than not, focus on eye health is not given sufficient attention and support. COECSA and its partners wish to make better known the issues of eye health in the region. The mandate of COECSA is to:
- Contribute to the human resources for health through quality training in ophthalmology
- Set standards for professional ophthalmic practice
- Facilitate continuing professional development
- Contribute to health policy development
- Promote research which advances ophthalmology in the region
- Create a forum for exchange of skills and knowledge
COECSA CURRICULUM
The COECSA curriculum offers regional consensus on what competences are required and what should be taught to residents. This curriculum is meant to be a guide for ophthalmology departments in designing training programs in their respective institutions. The curriculum will also act as a guide to trainees by providing a reference against which they can assess their progress. All institutions accredited to offer residency training programs shall be required to comply fully with the provisions of the College Council accreditation norms and standards.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The COECSA Residency Curriculum – 2020 Version has been developed following a review of the 2017 version of the curriculum based on recommendations from an independent consultancy which was commissioned by the College. The consultancy was a review of curriculum documents, an assessment on how they can be utilised and development of additional resources that will enhance and be supplementary to the existing curriculum. The curriculum review will now be conducted every after 5 years.
The key highlights of the 2020 Version aside from the general correction of formatting errors include:
- A break of the different learning domains into detailed sub domains/competences
- Defined learning milestones for each of the sub-domain
- Assessment forms for each competence
- Description of the Exams to be administered under the curriculum and an additional learning outcome on Gonioscopy
COECSA leadership wishes to acknowledge the immediate past President Dr. Ibrahim Matende under whose leadership the COECSA curriculum work was initiated. We further acknowledge the Education and Accreditation Committee for providing leadership in the development and review of the residency curriculum. The College acknowledges in particular the able leadership of Dr. Anna Sanyiwa (Muhimbili University of Health &Allied Sciences), Chair of the Curriculum Subcommittee (2016-2019) under which this work was made a success.
We further acknowledge the following for the immense contributions towards development of the first version of this curricula.
- Dr. Anne Ampaire Musika (from Makerere University, Uganda)
- Dr. Seneadza Asiwome
- Dr. Millicent Kariuki, Prof. Dunera Ilako and Dr. Kahaki Kimani (all of University of Nairobi, Kenya)
- Dr. John Nkurikiye and Prof. Wanjiku Mathenge (both of Rwanda International Institute of Ophthalmology)
- Dr. Levi Kandeke (Burundi)
- Dr. Gerald Msukwa and Dr. Petros Kayange (University of Malawi),
- Dr. Yeshigeta Gelaw (Jimma University, Ethiopia),
- Dr. Grace Chipalo - Mutati (University Teaching Hospital, Zambia),
- Dr. Geoffrey Wabulembo and Dr. Grace Ssali (Makerere University, Uganda),
- Dr. William Makupa (Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre),
- Prof. Amos Twinamasiko and Dr John Onyango (both of Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Uganda)
- Dr. Elias Hailu (Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia)
We also extend our gratitude to the team that reviewed and compiled the 2020 Version of the curriculum, for their commitment and hard work. These are:
1. Prof. Ciku Mathenge, (Rwanda International Institute of Ophthalmology, Rwanda)
2. Dr. John Cropsey (Kibuye Hope Hospital, Burundi)
3. Mr. Robert Ntitima (COECSA – Education and Training)
4. Dr. Zipporah Phiri (University Teaching Hospital, Zambia)
Special thanks also go to the Royal College of Ophthalmologists (RCOphth, UK) curriculum team comprising Dr. David Cottrell, Dr. Mike Nelson, Dr. Fiona Spencer, Prof. Carrie MacEwen, Ms. Kathy Evans, Mrs. Emily Beet, Ms. Beth Barnes, Ms. Denise Mabey and Ms. Susannah Grant for the technical input and support throughout the development process.
We further appreciate Softcall Communications for developing the online curriculum management system and for offering technical and training support.
The College extends special gratitude to Tropical Health Education Trust (THET) for providing funding through the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) and the International Centre for Eye Health (ICEH) that made this process possible. We are particularly grateful to Mr. Nick Astbury and Ms. Marcia Zondervan of the LSHTM for their unrelenting support.
Last but not least, we would like to acknowledge the secretarial and logistical support of the COECSA Secretariat throughout this process.
Dr. John Nkurikiye
COECSA President
THE CURRICULUM AT A GLANCE
Rationale
As a virtual college, COECSA works closely with accredited residency training institutions in the region to deliver ophthalmology training. This curriculum is meant to be a guide for ophthalmology departments in designing training programs in their respective institutions. Departments will be expected to structure their programs according to the system in their universities. At present, some universities still operate on term system while others have adapted the semester system. Also program duration varies from one institution to the other. In most residency training institutions in the region, the ophthalmology residency program (Master of Medicine in Ophthalmology) runs for three years, while in some institutions it runs for four years. Departments will therefore be required to organize the recommended content to fit within their own time structure. The curriculum will also act as a guide to trainees by providing a reference against which they can assess their progress.
All institutions accredited to offer residency training programs shall be required to comply fully with the provisions of the College accreditation norms and standards.
PROGRAM DELIVERY
Recommended length of COECSA Residency Program
To deliver all the learning outcomes in the COECSA curriculum, it is recommended that a residency training program should be structured to be completed in a minimum period of 4 years.
ASSESSMENT TOOLS
The resident will be assessed using the assessment and feedback tools recommended in the curriculum and by the COECSA examination. The assessment and feedback tools allow each workplace based assessment to be recorded and the minimum recommended numbers are included for the relevant learning outcomes.
COECSA residency curriculum adoption by existing training programs
The institutions that are just about to commence training are recommended to use the COECSA Competency Based Curriculum as the foundation of their training course. It is suggested that:
- A presentation be made to have the COECSA Competency Based Curriculum accepted at the National Accrediting Authorities.
- Existing institutions integrate the curriculum at the earliest opportunity during the curriculum review process.
- A staff meeting / workshop be conducted to introduce the COECSA Competency Based Curriculum.
- An introductory lecture at ophthalmology meetings locally or nationally could be used to introduce the COECSA Competency Based Curriculum to a wider audience.
- All the parties involved should be encouraged to familiarize themselves with the learning outcomes and assessment / feedback tools. A workshop for making the assessment and feedback tools effective is important (see Training the Trainers).
- Issuance of a Digital Version of the COECSA Competency Based Curriculum be made to each resident so they have access to it where web access is limited.
Achievement of learning outcomes
This curriculum has 139 learning outcomes (see 2.0: learning outcomes summary table). For the different learning outcomes to be achieved, reference should be made to the 10 domains of the COECSA curriculum to establish the specified target years of achievement.
The domains describe the outcomes which the ophthalmology trainee should strive to achieve and ophthalmologists should refer to these domains throughout the process of maintaining competence. The 10 domains include Basic & Clinical Sciences, Clinical Assessment, Patient Investigation, Patient Management and Practical Skills. Others are Surgical Skills, Community Eye Health, Communication, Best Practice and Management and Leadership.
It should be noted that the various domains have some crosscutting learning outcomes; thus, there is need to pay attention to the related learning outcomes while addressing a particular learning outcome.
Learning Methods/Delivery
A combination of several methods of delivery will be used to achieve face to face apprenticeship. The methods include Lectures, Clinical Work, Clinical Teachings, Tutorials, Seminars, Conferences and Demonstrations.
It will further be implemented through teaching in Surgical Skills Laboratory and Wet Lab, Log Books, Dissertations, Self-Directed Learning, Clinical Clerkship including normal working hours and calls as well as conducting Ward Rounds. Other methods include Supervising and Teaching the Junior Medical Staff who include undergraduate Medical Students and Paramedical Trainees, carrying out Call Duties as per the Hospital Schedule as well as external Clinical Rotations with the goal to have 2 external Clinical Rotations of 8 weeks each during the 2nd and 3rd Year of the Course.
THE SUMMARY TABLE
| DOMAINS | 1) Basic & Clinical Sciences | 2) Clinical Assessment | 3) Patient Investigation | 4) Patient Management | 5) Practical Skills | 6) Surgical Skills | 7) Community Eye Health | 8) Communication | 9) Best Practice | 10) Management and Leadership |
| LEARNING OUTCOMES | Anatomy And Embryology | Clinical History | Orthoptic Assessment | Management Plan | Refraction | Simulation And Wet Lab | Screening | Establishing Rapport | Learning | Health Service Organization |
| Physiology | Assess Vision | Corneal Assessment | Triage/Prioritization | Periocular And Intraocular Drug Administration | Operating Microscope | Injury Prevention | Active Listening | Records | Clinical Governance | |
| Biochemistry & Cell Biology | External Eye Examination | Ultrasonography | Therapeutics/Local And Systemic Therapies | Diathermy/Cautery | Aseptic Technique | Disease Risk Reduction | Delivering Information | Guidelines | Cooperation With Other Services | |
| Pathology | Pupil Examination | Angiography | Patient Selection For Surgery | Cryotherapy | Cataract Surgery | Immunization And Supplementation | Directing Patients To Information | Portfolio | Role As A Leader | |
| Optics | Ocular Motility | Retinal And Optic Nerve Imaging | Recognize And Manage Complications | Assess Tear Film | Surgery For Raised IOP | Determining the magnitude and burden of blindness | Obtaining Consent | IT | Role As A Community/Clinical Researcher | |
| Clinical Ophthalmology | IOP Measurement | Radiology/ Other Imaging | Emergencies/ First Aid/Resuscitation | Assess Lacrimal Drainage | Repair Trauma | Develop Health Promotion Action Plan | Breaking Bad News | Manage Referrals | Role As A Teacher | |
| Clinical Pharmacology | Slit Lamp | Electrophysiology | Rehabilitation And Low Vision | Corneal Scrape | Common Lid Surgery | Barriers To Communication | Waiting List Management | Role As A Manager | ||
| General Medicine For Ophthalmology | Fundus Examination | Laboratory Investigations | Refer Appropriately | Ocular Surface Foreign Body | Surgery For Surface Protection | Body Language | Use Of Databases | Apply Clinical Reasoning Using An Evidence Based Approach | ||
| 1) Basic & Clinical Sciences | 2) Clinical Assessment | 3) Patient Investigation | 4) Patient Management | 5) Practical Skills | 6) Surgical Skills | 7) Community Eye Health | 8) Communication | 9) Best Practice | 10) Management and Leadership | |
| Research Methodology, Epidemiology And Evidence Based Medicine | General Medical Examination | Biometry | Systemic Implications | Removal Of Sutures | Lateral Canthotomy/Lysis | Respond To Complaints | Critical Incident Management | Departmental Audit | ||
| Instruments | Paediatric/ Developmental Examination | Visual Fields | Spectacle Lenses | Bandage Contact Lens | Biopsy Eyelid And Ocular Tissue | Communicate With Other Professionals | Compassionate | Personal Audit | ||
| Statistics | Neuro Examination | Contact lens and diagnostic equipment care | Contact Lenses | Corneal Glue | Strabismus Surgery | Keeping Clinical Records | Patient Autonomy | Health Economics/Managing Resources | ||
| Clinical Genetics | Differential Diagnosis | Forced Duction Test | Removal Of Eye | Write And Dictate Clearly | Consideration | Prepare Monitoring And Evaluation Tools Of Projects | ||||
| Gonioscopy | ||||||||||
| Biometry | Laser - Lens Capsule | Preparing An Operating List | Patient Empathy | |||||||
| Hand Hygiene | Laser - Raised IOP | Organizing Leave | Patient Confidentiality | |||||||
| Laser - Retina | Insight Into Limitations | |||||||||
| AC/Vitreous Tap | Seeking Help | |||||||||
| Anterior Vitrectomy | Appraisal And 360 Degree Feedback | |||||||||
| Equality And Ethics | ||||||||||
| Probity | ||||||||||
| Practice According To National Legal Requirements | ||||||||||
| Data Protection | ||||||||||
| Human Tissue | ||||||||||
| Child Protection/ Safeguarding | ||||||||||
| Time Management | ||||||||||
| Reflective Practice | ||||||||||
| Self-Learning | ||||||||||
| Uncertainty | ||||||||||
| CPD | ||||||||||
| Career Development | ||||||||||
| Personal Health |
COECSA DOMAINS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE SUMMARY
COECSA has defined 10 domains for clinical ophthalmology practice. These domains describe a framework of competencies applicable to all ophthalmologists across the continuum of professional development from formal medical education and training through to maintenance of professional competence. They describe the outcomes which the ophthalmology trainee should strive to achieve and ophthalmologists should refer to these domains throughout the process of maintaining competence.
The 10 domains include:
- Basic & Clinical Sciences
- Clinical Assessment
- Patient Investigation
- Patient Management
- Practical Skills
- Surgical Skills
- Community Eye Health
- Communication
- Best Practice
- Management and Leadership
The table below summarizes the competences for the learning outcomes in their respective domains.
PLEASE NOTE that in the various domains there are some crosscutting learning outcomes, hence the need to pay attention to the related learning outcomes while addressing a particular learning outcome.
ASSESSMENTS
Assessments Overview
Broadly speaking the learning outcomes for each domain of clinical practice are assessed as follows:
| Domain of Practice | Assessment | |
| BCS | Basic and clinical sciences | Part 1 COECSA, Part 2 COECSA exams |
| CA | Clinical assessment | WpBA*rating scales, Part 2 COECSA exams |
| PI | Patient investigation | WpBA*rating scales, Part 2 COECSA exams |
| PM | Patient management | WpBA*rating scales ,Part 2 COECSA exams |
| PS | Practical skills | WpBA*rating scales ,Part 2 COECSA exams |
| SS | Surgical skills | WpBA*rating scales, Part 2 COECSA exams |
| CEH | Community eye health | WpBA*rating scales ,Part 2 COECSA exams |
| Com | Communication | WpBA*rating scales ,Part 2 COECSA exams |
| BP | Best practice | WpBA*rating scales |
| ML | Management and leadership | WpBA*rating scales |
EXAMINATIONS
A. Summative assessment in Ophthalmology residency
To qualify as an ophthalmologist under COECSA, a candidate must pass:
- ¨ Basic sciences exam ( Part1)
- ¨ Refraction and Optics (intermediate)
- ¨ Ophthalmic medicine and Ophthalmic surgery exam( Part 2)
- ¨ Clinical final exam
- ¨ (Dissertation/Publication)
B. Exams: Part 1 (Visual/Basic Sciences & Refraction and Optics)
- ¨ COECSA Part 1: ideally done during the first year of training. In the interim period, COECSA has opted to use ICO part one for convenience. The standards of ICO exams are universally accepted and a good number of residents are already sitting it in the region.
- ¨ ICO Part 1 will be adopted as COECSA part 1 till April 2021.
- ¨ The University MMed part 1 will be accepted as equivalent till end of 2019
- ¨ In 2020, COECSA senate shall assess the value of ICO exams for COECSA, and decide whether to continue or set own?
- ¨ From March 2022, COECSA will have its own part 1 exam if a decision to go that route is taken.
- ¨ Further, COECSA Optics and refraction exam will also be the ICO exam from April 2019 until April 2022.
- ¨ COECSA will have its own exam intermediate exam (Optics) from March 2023
- ¨ MMed Optics and Refraction (if any), will be accepted as equivalent till End of December 2020
C. Exams: Part 2 (Opth medicine and surgery)
- ¨ COECSA Ophthalmic Medicine and surgery part 2 exam will be the ICO exam from April 2021 till March 2024.
- ¨ MMed part 2 exam will be accepted as equivalent till end of 2021.
- ¨ From April 2025, COECSA will have its own part 2 exam subject to College Senate decision
D. Clinical Final Exam
- ¨ The current COECSA Fellowship Exam will remain as the final exit Clinical Exam
Target Year of Achievement (TYA)
These are summarized as follows:
| TYA | Explanation | Example |
| Year 1 | This LO must normally be achieved during the first year of training and by the end of year 1 at the latest. | CA1 (Clinical history) |
| Year 2 | This LO must normally be achieved during the first or second year of training and by the end of year 2 at the latest. Failure to achieve a significant number of these LO before the end of year 2 without mitigating circumstances may lead to a trainee being removed from the training programme. | BCS (Basic & Clinical Sciences) |
| Year 3 | This LO must normally be achieved during the first three years of training and by the end of year 3 at the latest. Failure to achieve a significant number of these LO before year 3 may require year 3 to be repeated. | SS4 (Cataract)
PS1 (Refraction) |
| Year 1,2,3/4 annual review | This LO must be achieved before the end of year 2 and will be assessed annually thereafter. | BP10-30
COM1-14 |
| Year 3/4 | This LO must be achieved in order to complete the core curriculum. It is unlikely to be achieved in the first two years of training but may be achieved anytime during years 3/4 | SS5 (surgery to lower IOP) |
WorkPLACE BaseD Assessments
The following WpBA assessment tools are available for Training:
| Tool | Code | Number of tools | Main Learning Outcome Domains Assessed |
| Clinical Rating Scale (modified CEX) | CRS | 8 | Clinical Assessment; Practical Refraction |
| Case based Discussion | CbD | 1 | Patient Investigation; Communication; Patient Management; Best Practice; Community Eye Health; Management and Leadership; Basic and Clinical Sciences |
| Direct Observation of Procedural Skills | DOPS | 1 | Practical Skills; Communication; Patient Investigation |
| Objective Assessment of Surgical and Technical Skills
|
OSATS
OSCAR |
4 | Surgical Skills; Communication |
| Multi-source feedback (modified PAT) | MSF | 1 | Communication; Best Practice |
The WpBA tools are available through the website to download for completion, validation by the trainer and can be stored in a paper-based portfolio/e-portfolio (when available). Guidance is available at your institution about who should be the assessor as not all assessments need to be performed by a consultant ophthalmologist. The target year of achievement (TYA) guidance indicates when each WpBA should be achieved.
If a trainee does not complete an assessment successfully, the assessment tool will act as a useful source of feedback and allow preparation for a subsequent assessment. It therefore allows for both formative (developmental) and summative (competence) assessment. Trainees should be encouraged to undergo formative assessment regularly as part of their training and not see 'failure' at an assessment as a problem. Trainees should keep all assessment forms in their portfolio to show that they are obtaining appropriate feedback and making progress. A portfolio that only contains 'passed' assessments should be discouraged - there should be a "culture of deferred success". A variety of assessors should be used, and especially where two satisfactory assessments are required in any year these should be completed by different assessors where possible.
MILESTONES
Milestones are knowledge, skills, attitudes, and other attributes organized in a developmental framework from less to more advanced. They are descriptors and targets for resident performance as the resident moves from entry into residency through graduation. These milestones were adapted from the ACGME Milestones used for residency training in the USA facilitated by the International Council of Ophthalmology and Orbis International. Each of the COECSA sub-domains of performance have been mapped to the milestones. The original ACGME milestone language has been modified when necessary to reflect practice in the COECSA region and correspond to the COECSA Curriculum.
Every six months, the level of milestones that best describes each resident’s current performance level should be selected based on appropriate assessment methods. The suggested methods are listed after each milestone. Thus, a variety of assessment tools must be completed every 6 months. These include oral and/or written tests, multisource feedback (360 degree assessment), observed clinical evaluations (CRS, OCEX) and assessments of procedural and surgical skill (DOPS, OSATS, OSCAR). This reporting form should be reviewed with each resident individually to give feedback regarding their progress. Completion of the milestone document will show if there are specific weaknesses in individual residents and allow early detection and hopefully successful remediation.
Milestones are arranged into expectations based on progression through training and not necessary according to the year of residency. Level 3 corresponds to the halfway point of training which will depend on the number of years of training the program has. Selection of a level implies that the resident substantially demonstrates the milestones in that level as well as those in earlier level. (See Reporting Form diagram below.)
Level 1: The resident demonstrates milestones expected of someone at the beginning ophthalmology residency.
Level 2: The resident is advancing and demonstrating year 1 milestones.
Level 3: The resident continues to advance and is demonstrating additional milestones; the resident consistently demonstrates the majority of milestones targeted for mid residency.
Level 4: The resident has advanced so that he or she now substantially demonstrates the milestones targeted for residency. This level is designed as the graduation target. Successfully graduating residents should be achieving this level in all areas.
Level 5: The resident has advanced beyond performance targets set for residency and is demonstrating “aspirational” goals which might describe the performance of someone who has been in practice for several years. It is expected that only a few exceptional residents will reach this level.
PORTFOLIO
The trainee's portfolio serves 2 important purposes for WBA:
- It contains all of the documents produced through the WBA tools described above
- It contains evidence that the trainee collects to show that they have met the remaining LO in the curriculum
The trainee should regularly maintain the portfolio and use it for the following:
- To store and organize WBA documents as they occur
- To record clinical experience (log book)
- To reflect upon clinical experience and plan learning (reflective diary)
- To record meetings with educational supervisor (appraisal documents)
- To prepare for the annual assessment (revalidation)
- To record formal and informal learning episodes (CPD document)
- To store audit/research/teaching activities
- To record any critical incidents, complaints, guidelines (clinical governance)
- Any other information that supports the trainee's Good Medical Practice e.g. letters from patients, feedback
Specific Learning Outcomes that are assessed at the annual assessment by reviewing the portfolio are:
| Learning Outcome (LO) | Target Year (TYA)* | Example of possible evidence | |
| PS1 | Refraction | 2 | DOPS |
| PS13 | Biometry | 2 | DOPS |
| PS14 | Hand Hygiene | 1 | MSF |
| BP17 | Appraisal and 360 degree feedback | 2 | Record of discussion, MSF, |
| BP19 | Probity | 1 | Statement |
| BP20 | Practice according to National Legal requirements | 2 | Record of discussion, MSF |
| BP21 | Data Protection | 1 | Record of discussion |
| BP22 | Human Tissue | 2 | Record of discussion |
| BP23 | Child Protection and safeguarding | 2 | Record of discussion |
| BP30 | Personal Health | 1 | Statement |
| PS8 | Ocular surface foreign body | 1 | DOPS forms |
| PS7 | corneal scrape | 1 | DOPS forms |
| SS2 | Operating Microscope | 1 | OSATS forms |
QUALITY ASSURANCE
In order to ensure that trainees have undergone the same training, quality assurance (QA) tools will be demanded at the end of the training programme as part of the assessment.
APPENDIX
ThE COECSA MILESTONES
Milestone Reporting
This section presents milestones designed for programs to use in semi-annual review of resident performance. Milestones are knowledge, skills, attitudes, and other attributes organized in a developmental framework from less to more advanced. They are descriptors and targets for resident performance as the resident moves from entry into residency through graduation. These milestones were adapted from the ACGME Milestones used for residency training in the USA facilitated by the International Council of Ophthalmology and Orbis International. Each of the COECSA sub-domains of performance have been mapped to the milestones. The original ACGME milestone language has been modified when necessary to reflect practice in the COECSA region and correspond to the COECSA Curriculum.
Every six months, the level of milestones that best describes each resident’s current performance level should be selected based on appropriate assessment methods. The suggested methods are listed after each milestone. Thus, a variety of assessment tools must be completed every 6 months. These include oral and/or written tests, multisource feedback (360 degree assessment), observed clinical evaluations (CRS, OCEX) and assessments of procedural and surgical skill (DOPS, OSATS, OSCAR). This reporting form should be reviewed with each resident individually to give feedback regarding their progress. Completion of the milestone document will show if there are specific weaknesses in individual residents and allow early detection and hopefully successful remediation.
Milestones are arranged into expectations based on progression through training and not necessary according to the year of residency. Level 3 corresponds to the halfway point of training which will depend on the number of years of training the program has. Selection of a level implies that the resident substantially demonstrates the milestones in that level as well as those in earlier level. (See Reporting Form diagram below.)
Level 1: The resident demonstrates milestones expected of someone at the beginning ophthalmology residency.
Level 2: The resident is advancing and demonstrating year 1 milestones.
Level 3: The resident continues to advance and is demonstrating additional milestones; the resident consistently demonstrates the majority of milestones targeted for mid residency.
Level 4: The resident has advanced so that he or she now substantially demonstrates the milestones targeted for residency. This level is designed as the graduation target. Successfully graduating residents should be achieving this level in all areas.
Level 5: The resident has advanced beyond performance targets set for residency and is demonstrating “aspirational” goals which might describe the performance of someone who has been in practice for several years. It is expected that only a few exceptional residents will reach this level.
COECSA Milestones Template Description
The diagram below presents an example set of milestones for one sub-competency in the same format as the milestone report worksheet. For each reporting period, a resident’s performance on the milestones for each sub-competency will be indicated by:
· selecting the level of milestones that best describes the resident’s performance in relation to the milestones
Or
· selecting the “Has not Achieved pre-residency level” option
| Each COECSA curriculum Sub-domain is mapped to the appropriate milestone here |
| PC-1 Patient Interview
COECSA CA1, CA10 | ||||||||||||||
| Has not achieved Level 1 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | |||||||||
| NA for PC-1
COECSA Milestones Template Description |
1. Obtains and documents basic history for ophthalmic complaint | 1. Acquires accurate and relevant problem-focused history for common ocular complaints
|
1. Obtains relevant historical subtleties including paediatric milestones in children that inform and prioritize both differential diagnoses and diagnostic plans, including sensitive, complicated, and detailed information that may not often be volunteered by the patient | 1. Demonstrates role model interview techniques to obtain subtle and reliable information from the patient for junior members of the healthcare team, particularly for sensitive aspects of ocular conditions | 1. Incorporates new information from literature to tailor interview questions
| |||||||||
Comments: | ||||||||||||||
| Selecting a response box in the middle of a level implies that milestones in that year and in lower levels have been substantially demonstrated. |
Assessment method indicated here
COMPLETE LIST OF COECSA MILESTONES
PATIENT CARE AND PROCEDURAL SKILLS
Residents must be able to provide patient care that is compassionate, appropriate, and effective for the treatment of health problems and the promotion of health. Residents must demonstrate competency in:
| PC-1 Patient Interview
COECSA CA1, CA10 | |||||||||||||
| Has not
Achieved Level 1 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | ||||||||
| 1. Obtains and documents basic history for ophthalmic complaint | 1. Acquires accurate and relevant problem-focused history for common ocular complaints
|
1. Obtains relevant historical subtleties including paediatric milestones in children that inform and prioritize both differential diagnoses and diagnostic plans, including sensitive, complicated, and detailed information that may not often be volunteered by the patient | 1. Demonstrates role model interview techniques to obtain subtle and reliable information from the patient for junior members of the healthcare team, particularly for sensitive aspects of ocular conditions | 1. Incorporates new information from literature to tailor interview questions
| |||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
| PC-2 Patient Examination
COECSA CA2-11 | ||||||||||||||
| Has not
Achieved Level 1 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | |||||||||
| 1. Describes components of complete ophthalmic examination
|
1. Performs and documents a complete ophthalmic examination targeted to a patient’s ocular complaints and medical condition
|
1. Performs problem-focused exam and document pertinent positive and negative findings
|
1. Identifies subtle or uncommon findings of common entities and typical or common findings of rarer entities | 1. Incorporates into clinical practice new literature about exam techniques | ||||||||||
| Comments: | ||||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
| PC-2A Vision Testing & Low Vision
COECSA CA2, PM7, PM10, PM11, PS1 | ||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 |
| 1. Check visual acuity (VA) in each eye with a near card and perform confrontation visual field testing | 1. Accurately measure and document VA, routine refractive errors, and color and field deficits, including Amsler grid
2. Recognize when low vision services are needed |
1. Perform more difficult refractions; use retinoscopy to refine technique and diagnose
2. Ability to prescribe glasses and contact lenses appropriately 2. Describe types of low vision devices. |
1. Perform complicated refractions, including post-operative; apply specialized visual tests (e.g., vertical prism test for non-organic visual loss) | 1. Develop advanced techniques for measuring vision in unusual circumstances |
| Comments: | ||||
Assessment Tools: Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
| PC-2B External
COECSA CA3 | ||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 4 | Level 5 | |
| 1. Describe components of external exam | 1. Detect obvious abnormalities (e.g., ptosis, exophthalmos); assess 5th and 7th cranial nerve function | 1. Identify less obvious abnormalities (e.g., mild ptosis, lid retraction, globe dystopia) | 1. Detect or verify most subtle abnormalities; confirm presence or absence of pertinent disease-specific findings (e.g., floppy lid, subtle retropulsion resistance) | 1. Develop advanced techniques for assessing external exam findings in unusual circumstances | ||
| Comments: | ||||||
Assessment Tools: Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
| PC-2C Ocular Motility/Orthoptic Evaluation
COECSA CA5, PI1, PS12 | ||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 |
| 1. Describe components of ocular motility exam; test versions and ductions | 1. Accurately test and record ductions, versions, saccadic and pursuit movements; detect obvious ocular misalignment; identify nystagmus | 1. Accurately measure alignment with prisms; detect less obvious misalignment; distinguish phoria and tropia, perform forced ductions | 1. Detect or verify subtle motility abnormalities; classify common nystagmus patterns | 1. Recognize and classify complex eye movement abnormalities at subspecialty level |
| Comments: | ||||
Assessment Tools: Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
| PC-2D Pupils
COECSA CA4 | ||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 |
| 1. Describe components of pupil testing, including test for relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) | 1. Accurately grade pupil size and reactivity; detect obvious asymmetry and RAPD | 1. Detect less obvious abnormalities (e.g., mild RAPD, efferent defect, sympathetic denervation); perform and interpret pharmacologic testing | 1. Detect or verify subtle abnormalities (e.g., light-near dissociation); search for associated neurologic findings; (e.g., lid or motility abnormalities) | 1. Recognize and classify pupillary abnormalities at subspecialty level |
| Comments: | ||||
Assessment Tools: Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
| PC-2E Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy
COECSA CA7 | ||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 |
| 1. Describe components of slit lamp exam; identify corneal abrasion | 1. Identify anterior segment structures; recognize common corneal and conjunctival abnormalities, iritis | 1. Recognize less obvious abnormalities (e.g., corneal edema, endothelial loss, dysplasia) | 1. Detect or verify subtle abnormalities (e.g., corneal thinning); search for associated findings (e.g., orbital signs) | 1. Recognize and classify anterior segment abnormalities at subspecialty level |
| Comments: | ||||
Assessment Tools: Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
| PC-2F Gonioscopy | ||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 |
| 1. Describe purpose of gonioscopy | 1. Describe principles and indications, and properly perform basic techniques of gonioscopy
|
1. Grade more questionable angles using compression and lens tilting; identify more subtle features (e.g., neovascularization, recession, synechiae) | 1. Perform in technically difficult examinations; detect or verify subtle abnormalities (e.g., pigmentation, plateau iris) | 1. Recognize and classify gonioscopic abnormalities at subspecialty level |
| Comments: | ||||
Assessment Tools: Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
| PC-2G Tonometry
COECSA CA6 | ||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 |
| 1. Describe applanation technique of measuring intraocular pressure | 1. Accurately measure intraocular pressure in routine patients using applanation | 1. Combine or modify techniques in patients with abnormal corneas or limited cooperation (e.g., Tono-Pen, average Goldmann readings 90 degrees apart) | 1. Develop advanced techniques for measuring intraocular pressure in unusual circumstances | |
| Comments: | ||||
Assessment Tools: Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
| PC-2H Ophthalmoscopy (Direct and Indirect)
COECSA CA8 | ||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 |
| 1. Identify optic nerve using direct ophthalmoscopy
|
1. Perform slit lamp indirect ophthalmoscopy
|
1. Perform slit lamp ophthalmoscopy with the Hruby, +78, +90 lenses, 3- mirror contact lens, and trans-equator (pan- funduscopic) contact lens
2. Detect less obvious abnormalities (e.g., early glaucomatous excavation, macular degeneration, large retinal tear) 3. Perform indirect ophthalmoscopy and peripheral retinal examination |
1. Detect or verify subtle abnormalities and unusual presentations (e.g., mild maculopathy, shallow detachment, subtle tear); perform scleral depression | 1. Recognize and classify complex optic disc and retino-vitreous abnormalities at subspecialty level |
| Comments: | ||||
Assessment Tools: Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
| PC-3 Diagnostic Procedures & Instruments
COECSA BCS10, PI7 | |||||||||||||
| Has not
Achieved Level 1 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | ||||||||
| 1. Describes role of office diagnostic procedures in diagnosis of ophthalmic disease
|
1. Selects and/or performs appropriate routine diagnostic tests and imaging procedures based on patient’s ocular complaints and medical condition | 1. Interprets routine findings. Recognize indications for advanced diagnostic tests and imaging procedures | 1. Interprets unusual findings, identify artifacts. Employ routine and advanced diagnostic tests and imaging procedures according to evidence based medicine | 1. Selects diagnostic procedures in a cost-effective manner
| |||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
| PC-3A Perimetry
COECSA PI10 | ||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | ||||||||
| 1. Describe role of perimetric tests to quantify and categorize visual loss in damage of the visual pathway | 1. Describe fundamentals of perimetry, including kinetic and static techniques; interpret perimetry in routine optic nerve and central nervous system (CNS) disorders | 1. Interpret perimetry in more complex optic nerve disorders, including glaucoma, and CNS disorders, including homonymous and bitemporal defects | 1. Interpret complex perimetric results, including change over time, using statistical algorithms; identify artifacts | 1. Recognize and classify complex perimetric abnormalities at subspecialty level | ||||||||
| Comments: | ||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
| PC-3B Corneal Pachymetry and Topography
COECSA PI2 | |||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | |||||||||
| 1. Describe purpose of corneal pachymetry and topography | 1. Describe indications for pachymetry and tomography; interpret basic abnormalities (e.g., irregular astigmatism, corneal thinning) | 1. Perform and interpret corneal topographic and pachymetric measurements, and apply these to refraction, contact lens fitting, glaucoma management | 1. Perform and interpret advanced corneal topographic and pachymetric measurements, and apply these to refractive surgery | 1. Recognize and classify complex pachymetry and topography abnormalities at subspecialty level | |||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
| PC-3C Ultrasonography & Biometry
COECSA PI3, PI9, PS13 | |||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | |||||||||
| 1. Describe role of ultrasonography for diagnosis when ocular media not clear | 1. Describe principles of, indications for, and techniques of ocular A- and B-scan ultrasonography | 1. Perform A- and B-scan and interpret basic findings (e.g., retinal and choroidal detachment, axial length) | 1. Utilize A-scan data to calculate intraocular lens (IOL) power; interpret complex A- and B-scan ultrasonography (e.g., choroidal melanoma) | 1. Recognize and classify complex ultrasonographic abnormalities at subspecialty level | |||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
| PC-3D Optic Coherence Tomography (OCT)/Confocal Laser Tomography (CLT)
COECSA PI5 | |||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | |||||||||
| 1. Describe purpose of OCT and CLT | 1. Describe principles of, indications for, and techniques of OCT and CLT in analyzing retina and optic disc | 1. Interpret basic OCT and CLT findings (e.g., nerve fiber layer thinning, macular edema, optic disc excavation) | 1. Interpret complex findings (e.g., epiretinal membranes); identify artifacts | 1. Recognize and classify complex OCT and CLT abnormalities at subspecialty level | |||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
| PC-3E Fluorescein Angiography
COECSA PI4 | |||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | |||||||||
| 1. Describe role of fluorescein angiography in diagnosis of retinal and optic nerve disease | 1. Describe principles of, indications for, and techniques of fluorescein angiography in analyzing the retina and optic disc (e.g., phases of the angiogram)
2. Interpret basic fluorescein angiography in common retinal disorders (e.g., diabetic retinopathy, cystoid macular edema) |
1. Interpret fluorescein angiography in less common retinal diseases | 1. Interpret fluorescein angiography in complex retinal vascular and other diseases (e.g., occult and recurrent choroidal neovascular membranes) | 1. Recognize and classify complex fluorescein angiographic abnormalities at subspecialty level | |||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD)
| PC-3F Neuroimaging (CT and MRI)
COECSA PI6 | |||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | |||||||||
| 1. Describe basic principles of CT and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging | 1. Describe indications for neuroimaging in ophthalmology; identify major MR sequences (e.g., T1, T2, FLAIR, fat suppression) | 1. Recognize normal anatomy of orbits and parasellar regions | 1. Identify major abnormalities (e.g., orbital and parasellar tumor, stroke, multiple sclerosis [MS] lesions) | 1. Recognize and classify complex CT & MRI abnormalities at subspecialty level | |||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD), oral/written exams, DOPS
| PC-3G Ocular Lubrication Testing
COECSA PS5 | |||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | |||||||||
| 1. Describe role of office testing to identify dry eyes | 1. Describe indications for and perform tests to identify dry eye syndrome and exposure keratopathy (e.g., assessment of tear film breakup time, corneal stain with fluorescein and rose bengal dyes, Schirmer test) | 1. Perform diagnostic temporary punctal occlusion | 1. Develop advanced techniques for quantifying ocular lubrication in unusual circumstances | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD), oral/written exams, DOPS
| PC-4 Disease Diagnosis
COECSA BCS6, CA12, PM9, PM10 | |||||||||||||
| Has not
Achieved pre-residency |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | ||||||||
| 1. Describes basic clinical features of common ophthalmologic disorders, e.g. red eye, glaucoma, cataract, diabetic retinopathy | 1. Recalls and presents clinical facts of the history and basic eye exam without higher level of synthesis and generates at least one item of the differential diagnosis for common ophthalmologic disorders
|
1. Abstracts and reorganizes elicited clinical findings
|
1. Organizes clinical facts in a hierarchical level of importance. Identify discriminating features between similar patients
Incorporates most current literature findings in formulation of differential diagnosis 2. Generates focused differential and evaluation strategy to finalize diagnosis 3. Verifies diagnostic assessments of junior members of healthcare team |
1 Continues to incorporate most current literature findings in formulation of differential diagnosis
| |||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD), oral/written examination
| PC-5 Nonsurgical Therapy
COECSA BCS7, PM1, PM2, PM3, PM6, PS10 | |||||||||||||
| Has not
Achieved pre-residency |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | ||||||||
| 1. Describes basic concepts of ophthalmic pharmacotherapy, e.g. most common topical diagnostic and therapeutic agents
|
1. Describes categories of medications (e.g. lubricant, antibiotic, anti-inflammatory, anesthetic); describes basic pharmacology of drug therapy and broad indications/contraindications for medical therapy of common ophthalmic conditions; describes routes of drug administration (e.g. topical, oral, periocular, and intravenous) and dosing regimens
|
1. Initiates therapy with medication for common ophthalmic diseases; monitor for adverse drug reactions and interactions
|
1. Manages and individualizes medical therapy for more complex ophthalmic conditions
|
1. Adopts new therapies based on CME and literature review. Identifies gaps in care and process for improvement
| |||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD), oral/written examination/DOPS
| PC-6 Minor Surgery
COECSA PM1, PM2, PM4, PM5 | |||||||||||||
| Has not
Achieved pre-residency |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | ||||||||
| 1. Describes essential components of care related to non-OR surgery, e.g., informed consent, indications and contraindications for surgery, pertinent anatomy, anaesthetic and operative technique, potential intra- and postoperative complications | For each procedure:
1. Lists indications and describe relevant anatomy and pathophysiology of disorder 2. Identifies findings that are indicators for the procedure and potential postop complications 3. Describes anaesthetic & surgical technique, mechanism of effect, and specific instruments required 4. Performs directed pre-op assessment; administers anesthesia and performs procedure with direct supervision; provides appropriate post-op care |
1. Administers anaesthesia and perform procedure with indirect supervision
2. Recognizes intra- and postoperative complications
|
1. Administers anaesthesia and performs procedure with oversight supervision
|
1. Attains individual outcome & process measures within 2 standard deviations of benchmark means
| |||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: DOPS, OSAT
| PC-6A Laser Procedures
COECSA SS13, SS14, SS15 | |||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | |||||||||
| 1. Describe uses of laser in ophthalmology | 1. Identify mode of tissue interaction, therapeutic effect, side effects, complications, safety issues
2. Describe appropriate laser settings 3. Use equipment effectively with correct contact lens, including peripheral retina, lens capsule |
1. Perform glaucoma (e.g., iridotomy, trabeculoplasty) and retina (e.g., panretinal photocoagulation, laser retinopexy for isolated retinal breaks) procedures, Yag capsulotomy | 1. Perform more complicated retinal procedures (e.g., diabetic focal/grid macula, repeat panretinal photocoagulation laser retinopexy of large or multiple breaks) | 1. Perform laser procedures at subspecialty level | |||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: DOPS, OSAT
| PC-6B Nasolacrimal Probing and Irrigation
COECSA PS6 | |||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | |||||||||
| 1. Describe purpose of nasolacrimal probing and irrigation | 1. Perform basic lacrimal assessment (e.g., dye testing, punctal dilation, canalicular probing) | 1. Perform basic lacrimal procedures (e.g., lacrimal drainage testing, irrigation, dye disappearance test) and lacrimal intubation | 1. Perform advanced lacrimal assessment (e.g., intra- and post-operative testing, canalicular probing in trauma) | 1. Perform nasolacrimal probing and irrigation in unusual circumstances at subspecialty level | |||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: DOPS, OSAT
| PC-6C
Chalazion Excision, Excision/Biopsy Lid/Conjunctiva Lesion Tarsal plate rotation Corneal scrape COECSA SS10 | ||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | ||||||||
| 1. Demonstrates PC-6 Level 1 milestones for the procedures above with direct supervision | 1. Demonstrates PC-6 Level 2 milestones for the procedures above with direct supervision | 1. Demonstrates PC-6 Level 3 milestones for the procedures above with indirect supervision | 1. Demonstrates PC-6 Level 4 milestones for the procedures above with oversight supervision | 1. Demonstrates PC-6 Level 5 milestones for the procedures above with oversight supervision | ||||||||
| Comments: | ||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: DOPS, OSAT
| PC-7 OT Surgery
COECSA PM4, PM5, PS3, PS4, SS1, SS2, SS3, COM5, COM6, COM13 | |||||||||||||
| Has not
Achieved pre-residency |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | ||||||||
| 1. Describes essential components of care related to OR surgery, e.g., informed consent, indications and contraindications for surgery, pertinent anatomy, anesthetic and operative technique, potential intra- and postoperative complications | For each procedure:
1. Lists indications for, procedure selection, describe relevant anatomy, instrumentation for procedures, including calibration and operation of the microscope, and necessary postoperative care
6. Wet lab participation |
1. Obtains informed consent and perform selected procedures
|
1. Obtains informed consent and perform selected procedures
|
1. Attains individual outcome & process measures within 2 standard deviations of benchmark means
| |||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: DOPS, OSATS, OSCARs, video review with rubric,
| PC-7A Cataract Surgery
COECSA SS4 | |||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | |||||||||
| 1. Describe indications and technique of cataract surgery | 1. Perform selected portions of cataract surgery, including wound construction and microsurgical suturing
|
1. Perform informed consent for cataract surgery
2. Describe MSICS/ phacoemulsification instruments and settings and how they facilitate the procedure 3. Describe categories of IOLs, advantages, and disadvantages 4. Perform cataract surgery 5. Perform post-operative care of cataract surgery patients, identify post-operative complications |
1. Perform cataract surgery proficiently, including complex technical aspects
Manage post-operative complications |
1. Perform cataract surgery at subspecialty level | |||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: DOPS, OSATS, OSCARs, video review with rubric,
| PC-7B Strabismus Surgery
COECSA SS11 | |||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | |||||||||
| 1. Describe indications for and technique of strabismus surgery | 1. Perform selected portions of strabismus surgery, including extraocular muscle suturing
|
1. Obtains informed consent for strabismus surgery
2. Perform horizontal strabismus surgery recession and resection 3. Manage intra- and post- operative complications of strabismus surgery |
1. Perform vertical and oblique muscle strabismus surgery
|
1. Perform strabismus surgery at subspecialty level | |||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: DOPS, OSATS, OSCARs, video review with rubric,
| PC-7C Cornea
COECSA PS7, PS8, PS9, PS11 | |||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | |||||||||
| 1. Describe indications for and technique of cornea surgery | 1. Describe concepts of corneal astigmatism/ refractive error, stromal scarring, and endothelial function, and their surgical management
|
1. Obtains informed consent for common corneal surgeries
2. Perform suture removal and corneal scrape at slit lamp 3. Describe techniques of corneal patch grafting, gluing, chelation of band keratopathy, conjunctival flaps, and amniotic membrane grafting 4. Perform suturing of corneal wounds (traumatic or surgical) 5. Perform pterygium surgery |
1. Perform limbal relaxing incisions or arcuate keratotomy as part of cataract surgery
3. Recognize and initiate management of common post-operative complications (e.g., graft rejection) |
1. Perform cornea surgery at subspecialty level | |||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: DOPS, OSATS, OSCARs, video review with rubric
| PC-7D Glaucoma
COECSA SS5 | ||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 |
| 1. Describe indications for and technique of glaucoma surgery | 1. Describe indications for glaucoma surgery
|
1. Obtains informed consent for common glaucoma surgeries (e.g., trabeculectomy, tube shunt, ciliary body ablation)
|
1. Perform common glaucoma surgeries (e.g., trabeculectomy, tube shunt, ciliary body ablation)
|
1. Perform glaucoma surgery at subspecialty level |
| Comments: | |||||||||
Assessment Tools: DOPS, OSATS, OSCARs, video review with rubric
| PC-7E Oculoplastic/Orbit
COECSA SS6, SS7, SS8, SS9, SS12 | |||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | |||||||||
| 1. Describe indications for and technique of oculoplastic/orbit surgery | 1. Demonstrate basic lid and skin suturing techniques
|
1. Use functional symptoms and exam findings to generate a treatment plan for oculoplastic care
2. Assess facial and eyelid trauma (including imaging studies) to develop a treatment plan 3. Obtains informed consent for oculoplastic procedures 4. Close complex wounds, including those involving the eyelid margin and evisceration |
1. Demonstrate and incorporate knowledge of facial anatomy into treatment plan
2. Weigh alternative treatment options and describe risks and benefits of each 3. Perform basic oculoplastics procedures (e.g., tarsal strip, blepharoplasty, ptosis repair, closure of complex wounds, canthotomy, cantholysis, enucleation) 4. Perform simple flaps and grafts |
1. Perform oculoplastic/orbit surgery at subspecialty level including exenteration | |||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: DOPS, OSATS, OSCARs, video review with rubric,
| PC-7F Retino-vitreous
COECSA SS16 | ||||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | ||||||||||
| 1. Describe indications for and technique of retinovitreous surgery | 1. Describe indications for and associated risks of intra- vitreal injections | 1. Perform intra-vitreal injections & taps
2. Describe indications for, and techniques and complications of pars plana vitrectomy and sclera buckling surgery; assist on retinal surgery 3. Describe indications for, and techniques and complications of radiation therapy for ocular tumors (e.g., radioactive plaque localization, external beam radiation, radiation retinopathy) |
1. Obtains informed consent for vitreoretinal surgery
|
1. Perform retinovitreous surgery at subspecialty level | ||||||||||
| Comments: | ||||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: DOPS, OSATS, OSCARs, video review with rubric,
| PC-7G Globe Trauma
COECSA SS6 | |||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | |||||||||
| 1. Describe indications for and technique of globe trauma surgery | 1. Describe common setting for globe trauma and injury prevention
2. Describe use of protective eye shield in potential globe rupture 3. Perform examination under anesthesia for suspected globe rupture 4. Prepare patient with suspected rupture for surgery 4. Describe surgical steps to identify globe rupture 5. Describe techniques and sutures for repair of ruptured globe |
1. Obtains informed consent for ruptured globe repair
|
1. Perform repair of complicated corneal and scleral wounds | 1. Perform globe trauma surgery at subspecialty level | |||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: DOPS, OSATS, OSCARs, video review with rubric,
| PC-8 Consultation
COECSA BP6, BP7, BP16, BP27, ML3 | |||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | Level 1 | ||||||||
| 1. Describes the role of ophthalmology consultation in systemic disease | 1. Provides specific, responsive ophthalmologic consultation to other medical specialties
|
1. Recognizes ophthalmic emergencies and immediate, necessary interventions
|
1. Identifies consultations requiring surgical intervention, including procedural options and timing
|
1. Provides ophthalmic subspecialty consultation when indicated
| |||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: Clinical Rating Scale – consultation skills, OCEX, Case Based Discussion (CbD), oral/written exams
| PC-9 Community Eye Health: Screening, Eye Injuries, Immunizations, Health Promotion
COECSA CEH1, CEH2, CEH5, CEH6 | |||||||||||||
| Has not
Achieved pre-residency |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | ||||||||
| 1 understand general principles of screening and immunization | 1. understand basic principles of the public health aspect of eye care.
|
1. participate in community screening and refer when appropriate
|
1. Apply basic principles of the public health aspect of eye care.
|
1. organize/conduct new screening programs and surveys
| |||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment tools: written or oral tests, faculty evaluation
MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE
Residents must demonstrate knowledge of established and evolving basic science, clinical, epidemiological and social-behavioral sciences, as well as the application of this knowledge to patient care. Residents must demonstrate level-appropriate knowledge in the following core domains: anatomy, physiology, biochemistry, molecular and cell biology, genetics, General Medicine; Fundamentals & Principles of Ophthalmology; Optics & Refraction; Ophthalmic Pathology & Intraocular Tumors; Neuro-Ophthalmology; Paediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus; Orbit, Eyelids, & Lacrimal System; Cornea, External Disease, & Anterior Segment Trauma; Lens & Cataract; Refractive Management & Intervention; Intraocular Inflammation & Uveitis; Glaucoma; Retina/Vitreous
| MK-1 Demonstrate level-appropriate knowledge
COECSA BCS 1-5 | |||||||||||||
| Has not
Achieved pre-residency |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | ||||||||
| 1. Has successfully completed internship after basic medical degree graduation | 1. successfully passes exams of medical knowledge as required to progress through program | 1. successfully passes exams of medical knowledge as required to progress through program | 1. successfully passes exams of medical knowledge as required to progress through program | 1. Achieves COECSA Fellowship certification. | |||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: Viva, written exams (semester/annual), ICO Exams, COECSA Fellowship exam
| MK-2 Demonstrate level-appropriate knowledge applied to patient management
COECSA BCS8, BCS12 | |||||||||||||
| Has not
Achieved pre-residency |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | ||||||||
| 1. Demonstrates level-appropriate knowledge for patient management on ophthalmology rotation | 1. Demonstrates level-appropriate knowledge for patient management for level | 1. Demonstrates level-appropriate knowledge for patient management for level | 1. Demonstrates level-appropriate knowledge for patient management on for level | 1. Participates in CPD according to country requirements | |||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: Observed patient encounter (OCEX CCRS), Viva preferred over written, Case-Based Discussion evaluation
| MK-3 Equipment Maintenance
COECSA CEH4 | |||||||||||||
| Has not
Achieved pre-residency |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | ||||||||
|
|
1 Able to describe parts and function of diagnostic equipment/lenses and their basic maintenance
|
|
1 Able to describe and teach proper diagnostic equipment use and maintenance |
Works within the system to obtain most cost-efficient equipment
| |||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment tools: faculty evaluation, written/oral test
PROFESSIONALISM
Residents must demonstrate a commitment to carrying out professional responsibilities and an adherence to ethical principles. Residents are expected to demonstrate:
| PROF-1: Compassion, integrity, and respect for others; sensitivity and responsiveness to diverse patient populations
COECSA BP18 | |||||||||||||
| Has not
Achieved pre-residency |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | ||||||||
| 1. Recognizes and never participates in:
verbal or physical abuse to patients, peers, staff, or supervisors; sexual harassment
discrimination based on gender, age, culture, race, religion, disability, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status |
1. Consistently demonstrates behaviour that conveys caring, honesty, and genuine interest in patients and families
2. Demonstrates compassion, integrity, respect, sensitivity, and responsiveness 3. Exhibits these attitudes consistently in common and uncomplicated situations 4. Usually recognizes cultural and socioeconomic issues in patient care |
1. Exhibits these attitudes in complex and complicated situations
|
1. Exhibits these attitudes consistently in all relationships and situations
|
1. Role models behavior demonstrating compassion and respect for others, cultural and socioeconomic issues in patient care
| |||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: 360 degree/multisource feedback, OSCE
| PROF 2: Responsiveness to patient needs that supersedes self-interest
COECSA BP18, BP24, BP30 | ||||||||||||||
| Has not
Achieved pre-residency |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | |||||||||
| 1. Recognizes and never participates in:
refusal to perform assigned tasks, answer pages or calls; avoidance of scheduled call duty |
1. Almost always completes patient care tasks promptly and completely; punctual; appropriately groomed
2. Manages fatigue, sleep deprivation and personal health issues. 3. Identifies impact of personal beliefs and values on practice of medicine |
1. Consistently completes patient care tasks promptly and completely; punctual; appropriately groomed
|
1. Monitors fatigue, sleep deprivation and personal health in junior members of health care team
|
1. Role models behavior demonstrating compassion and respect for others
| ||||||||||
| Comments: | ||||||||||||||
Assessment Tools 360 degree/multisource feedback
| PROF-3: Respect for patient privacy and autonomy
COECSA BP14, BP18, BP21 | |||||||||||||
| Has not
Achieved pre-residency |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | ||||||||
| 1. Conforms to national patient rights regulations
2. Recognizes and never participates in: unauthorized examination of patient records disclosure of protected health information to unauthorized personnel |
1. Almost always: recognizes and implements required procedures for patient involvement in human research; inform patients of rights; involve patients in medical decision-making | 1. Consistently recognizes and implements required procedures for patient involvement in human research; informs patients of rights; involves patients in medical decision-making
2. Mentors junior members of the healthcare team regarding protection of patient privacy |
1. Role models behavior regarding protection of patient privacy
2. Mentors residents involved in administration of research projects involving humans 3. Develops organizational policies and education to support the application of these principles | ||||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: 360 degree/multisource
| PROF-4: Accountability to patients, society and the profession
COECSA BP4, BP8, BP9, BP17, BP18, BP19, BP20, BP22, BP23 | |||||||||||||
| Has not
Achieved pre-residency |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | ||||||||
| 1. Recognizes and never participates in:
deception regarding level of training and experience, medical errors; demeaning other practitioners
plagiarism, falsification of records, misrepresentation of training, unexplained absences
|
1. Usually recognizes simple conflict of interest scenarios
|
1. Almost always recognizes and takes appropriate steps to manage simple conflict of interest scenarios
|
1. Consistently recognizes and takes appropriate steps to manage more complex conflict of interest scenarios
|
1. Assumes leadership and mentoring role in management of more complex conflict of interest scenarios
| |||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: 360 degree/multisource, oral/written exam, portfolio
INTERPERSONAL AND COMMUNICATION SKILLS
Residents must demonstrate interpersonal and communication skills that result in the effective exchange of information and collaboration with patients, their families, and health professionals. Residents are expected to:
| ICS-1: Communicate effectively with patients and families with diverse socioeconomic and cultural backgrounds.
1. Rapport development 3. Counsel and educate 2. Interview skills 4. Conflict management COECSA COM1, COM3, COM4, COM7, COM10, COM11, COM12, BP 10, BP11, BP12, BP13 | ||||||||||||
| Has not
Achieved Level 1 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | |||||||
| 1. Develops positive relationship with patients in uncomplicated situations based on mutual trust; demonstrate empathy
2. Describes factors that affect communication (e.g. modality, language, use of interpreters, other family in the room, hearing, vision, and cognitive impairments, body language) 3. Engages in active listening, teach-back and other strategies to ensure patient understanding. 4. Recognizes ethical and relational communication conflicts |
1. Develops positive relationships with families and team members
2. Identifies special communication needs of vulnerable populations 3. Counsels patients compassionately at appropriate level for comprehension regarding disease: causes & mechanisms; risk factors; prognosis; management options; risks & benefits 4. Engages patient in shared decision-making, based on the patient’s understanding and ability to carry out the proposed plan 5. Negotiates and manages simple patient/family-related conflicts |
1. Develops working relationships in complex situations across specialties and systems of care
2. Effectively communicates with vulnerable populations, both patients at risk and their families, orally and in writing 3. Actively seeks information from multiple sources, including consultations. 4. Organizes family/patient/team member conferences and facilitate/lead them. 5. Counsels patients regarding emotionally difficult information such as blindness; use appropriate technique for "breaking bad news" 6. Negotiates and manages conflict in complex |
1. Sustains working relationships during complex and challenging situations including transitions of care and breaking bad news.
2. Coordinates care for vulnerable populations across health care and social/governmental systems using both oral and written communication 3. Demonstrates effective integration of all available sources of information when gathering patient-related data 4. Counsels patients regarding potential short and long term impact of complex, higher risk disease and intervention; address special needs; direct to resources 5. Documents results of communications, patient preferences, conflict resolution, advance directives |
1. Sustains relationships across systems of care and with patients during long-term follow-up
| ||||||||
| Comments: | ||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: 360 degree/msf, OCEX, OSCE, chart review
| ICS-2: Communicate effectively with physicians, other health professionals, and health related agencies
1. Comprehensive, timely, and legible medical records 2. Consultation requests 3. Care transition (Patient hand-over) 4. Conflict management (workplace) COECSA PM8, CEH3 | |||||||||||||
| Has not
Achieved Level 1 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | ||||||||
| 1. Produces comprehensive, timely, and legible non-ophthalmic medical records
|
1. Produces comprehensive, timely, and legible ophthalmic medical records
|
1. Maintains face-to-face patient communication while using EMR
|
1. Effectively and ethically uses all forms of communication including face-to-face, telephone, electronic, and social media.
|
1. Develops models/approaches to managing difficult communications
| |||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: 360 degree/msf, OCEX, OSCE, chart review
| ICS-3: Work effectively as a member or leader of a healthcare team or other professional group
1. Clinical team (outpatient clinic, inpatient consult service) 2. Operating room team 3. Professional workgroup, e.g. QI committee COECSA ML7 | |||||||||||||
| Has not
Achieved Level 1 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | ||||||||
| 1. Defines team purpose | 1. Describes role and responsibility of each team member
|
1. Implements team activities as directed by team leader
|
1. Selects, evaluates, provides feedback, and remediates team members
4. Designs and implements plan for team improvement |
1. Develops institutional and organizational strategies to improve team functions, trains physicians and educators | |||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: 360 degree/msf, portfolio
| ICS-4: Effectively present didactic and case-based educational material to physicians and other healthcare professionals
COECSA ML6 | |||||||||||||
| Has not
Achieved Level 1 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | ||||||||
| 1. Organizes clear and accurate non-ophthalmic case presentation with level-appropriate diagnostic and management recommendations | 1. Organizes case presentation for basic ophthalmic conditions, with diagnostic and management recommendations
|
1. Organizes case presentation for more complex ophthalmic conditions, with diagnostic and management recommendations
|
1. Schedules, organizes, and implements case-based and didactic conference program
|
1. Provides leadership for conference implementation
| |||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: 360 degree/msf, portfolio, faculty evaluation
PRACTICE-BASED LEARNING AND IMPROVEMENT
Residents must demonstrate the ability to investigate and evaluate their care of patients, to appraise and assimilate scientific evidence, and to continuously improve patient care based on constant self-evaluation and life-long learning. Residents are expected to develop skills and habits to be able to meet the following goals:
| PBLI-1: Self-Directed Learning
1. Identify strengths, deficiencies, and limits in one’s knowledge and expertise. 2. Set learning and improvement goals. 3. Identify and perform appropriate learning activities. 4. Use information technology to optimize learning. COECSA BP1, BP2, BP3, BP5, BP15, BP15, BP25, BP26, BP28 | |||||||||||||
| Has not
Achieved Level 1 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | ||||||||
| 1. Identifies gaps in personal knowledge and expertise
2. Demonstrates computer literacy and basic computer skills in clinical practice |
1. Assesses performance by self-reflection and review of feedback and evaluations
2. Develops a learning plan, based on feedback, with supervision 3. Utilizes review articles or practice guidelines to answer specific questions in clinical practice |
1. Develops learning plan independently with supervision, with accurate assessment of competence and areas for continued improvement
2. Utilizes appropriate evidence-based information tool to answer specific questions while providing care |
1. Utilizes self-directed learning with little external guidance
2. Consistently uses evidence-based information tools to answer specific questions 3. Utilizes system or process for keeping up with relevant changes in medicine |
1. Maintains knowledge and regular review of best evidence supporting common practices and acknowledges strengths and deficiencies
2. Participates in CPD requirements 48 months | |||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: portfolio, faculty evaluation
| PBLI-2: Locate, appraise, and assimilate evidence from scientific studies related to their patients’ health problems.
COECSA BCS9, BCS11, PM1, PM2, BP1, BP2, BP3, ML5, ML8, ML9, ML10, ML12 | |||||||||||||
| Has not
Achieved Level 1 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | ||||||||
| 1. Describes basic concepts in clinical epidemiology, biostatistics, and clinical reasoning
|
1. Ranks study designs by validity, generalizability to larger populations, and identifies critical threats to study validity
2. Distinguishes relevant research outcomes from other types of evidence 3. Formulates a searchable question from a clinical question and use IT to investigate it 4. Participate in clinical audit |
1. Applies a set of critical appraisal criteria to different types of research, including synopses of original research findings, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and clinical practice guidelines
2. Critically evaluates information from others: colleagues, experts, pharmaceutical representatives, and patient-delivered information 3. Conduct & interpret clinical audit |
1. Demonstrates a clinical practice that incorporates principles and basic practices of evidence-based practice and information mastery
2. Conduct, interpret and manage junior residents in clinical audit |
1. Independently teaches and assesses evidence-based medicine and information mastery techniques
2. Cites evidence supporting several commonly used techniques in own practice | |||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: faculty evaluation, portfolio
| PBLI-3 Research Projects/ Dissertation*
· The COECSA Curriculum does not require a dissertation or research project. This milestone only applies to programs that require a dissertation or publication of research | |||||||||||||
| Has not
Achieved Level 1 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | ||||||||
| 1 Be aware that a dissertation or research project is required | 1. Learn about research methods
2. Identify dissertation/ research topic |
1. Dissertation/Research proposal completed & approved by deadline set by program
2. Data collection has started |
1. Completed Data collection
2. Completed & submitted dissertation/ research paper 3. Published at least 1 article 4. Presented research in a conference |
1. Continue publishing
4. Presented research in an international conference | |||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment: Supervisor Review, Dissertation Grade
SYSTEMS-BASED PRACTICE
Residents must demonstrate an awareness of and responsiveness to the larger context and system of health care, as well as the ability to call effectively on other resources in the system to provide optimal health care. Residents are expected to:
| SBP-1: Work effectively and coordinate patient care in various health care delivery systems
COECSA BP6, ML1 | |||||||||||||
| Has not
Achieved Level 1 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | ||||||||
| 1. Describes basic levels of systems of care (self-management to societal) | 1. Describes systems of care within residency training program
2. Lists potential impediments to safe and efficient handovers of care within and between systems |
1. Identifies impediments to safe and efficient referrals within and between systems
2. Manages routine handovers safely |
1. Proposes solutions to impediments to safe and efficient transitions of care within and between systems
2. Manages complex handovers of care within and between systems |
1. Leads systems change at micro and macro level
| |||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: faculty evaluation, 360 degree/msf
| SBP-2: Incorporate cost-effectiveness, risk/benefit analysis, and IT to promote safe and effective patient care
COECSA ML11 | ||||||||||||||
| Has not
Achieved Level 1 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | |||||||||
| 1. Describes scenarios in which physician may affect cost-effectiveness in patient care
|
1. Describes cost-effectiveness in patient care
2. Aware of cost options for most frequently ordered tests and medications 3. Utilizes where available the Electronic Health Record (EHR) to order tests and medications, document notes; 3. Demonstrate medication reconciliation for patients 4. Uses information systems for patient care |
1. Almost always practices cost-effective care
|
1. Consistently practices cost-effective care
|
1. Advocates for cost-effective care and use of risk-benefit analyses within health care system
| ||||||||||
| Comments: | ||||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: faculty evaluation
| SBP-3: Work in inter-professional teams to enhance patient safety, identify system errors and implement solutions
COECSA ML2, ML4, | |||||||||||||
| Has not
Achieved Level 1 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | ||||||||
| 1. Describes epidemiology of medical errors and differences between medical errors, near misses, and sentinel events
2. Describes role of teamwork and communication failure in healthcare as a leading cause of preventable patient harm |
1. Reports problematic processes including errors and near misses to supervisor
2. Describes use of checklists and briefings to prevent adverse events in healthcare |
1. Analyses causes of adverse events through root cause analysis (RCA)
2. Applies checklist-guided briefings in healthcare activities 3. Can function as the leader of the team when called upon. |
1. Develops content for and facilitate patient safety M&M presentation or conference focusing on systems-based errors in patient care
2. Analyses shared team experience (e.g. procedure) with debriefing to solve problems 3. Can function as the leader of the team when called upon. |
1. Designs checklists for use in healthcare
2. Creates curriculum to teach teamwork and communication skills to healthcare professionals | |||||||||
| Comments: | |||||||||||||
Assessment Tools: faculty evaluation
WORKPLACE BASED ASSESSMENTS
Clinical Rating Scale
| CRS | Learning Outcome | Target Year (TYA)# | Assessor* | |
| CRS1 | CA1 | Consultation | 1 annual review | Cons |
| CRS2 | CA2 | Vision | 1 | Cons/AHP |
| CRS3 | CA3 | Fields | 1 | Cons |
| CRS4 | CA4 | External eye | 1 | Cons |
| CRS5 | CA5 | Pupil | 1 | Cons |
| CRS6 | CA6 | Ocular motility | 2 | Cons |
| CRS7 | CA7 | IOP | 1 | Cons/AHP |
| CRS8 | CA8 | Slit lamp | 1 | Cons |
| CRS9a, CRS9b
CRS9c, CRS9d |
CA9 | Fundus | 2 | Cons |
| CRSret | PS2 | Retinoscopy (Paed) | 3 | Cons/Optometrist |
* Assessors:
- Cons: consultant ophthalmologist
- AHP: appropriately trained allied health professional (nurse, orthoptist, optometrist)
Clinical Rating Scale CRS1 (Outcome CA1: CLINICAL HISTORY)
COECSA Workplace Based Assessments
Clinical Rating Scale CRS1 (Outcome CA1-Clinical History)
All trainees must be able to take a clinical history from a patient, which is appropriate for the clinical problem and the individual patient’s needs.
Trainee’s Name Date (dd/mm/yyyy)
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 Other (specify)
Assessor's name Type of assessment: Formative Summative
Assessor's status Consultant Senior Trainee Other (Specify)
Brief description of case
Please grade the following areas using the scale below (use tick or cross)
| Attitude and manner | |||||
| V good trainees introduce themselves and establish the name of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer). Their demeanour throughout the interview shows that they are actively listening to the patient by gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They establish a good rapport with the patient which is respectful of any ethnic, religious or social preferences that they express. They are empathic and sensitive to the patient’s concerns.
Poor trainees neither introduce themselves nor identify the patient. They hurry the patient and ignore what the patient is saying. They look away or appear impatient during the history taking. There are unable to establish rapport with the patient and show little respect. | |||||
| Poor | Fair | Good | V Good | n/a | |
| Introduction and start of interview | |||||
| Rapport with patient and development of trust | |||||
| Listening skills, appropriate eye contact and non-verbal communication | |||||
| Empathy and sensitivity | |||||
| Respect for patient | |||||
| Information gathering | |||||
| V good trainees capture all of the appropriate information required for the ophthalmic examination and diagnosis, the planning of investigations and subsequent management. Their questions are structured and guided by the differential diagnosis suggested by the presenting complaint.
Poor trainees ask questions by rote. They omit important areas. They do not pursue an appropriate line of questioning informed by a differential diagnosis. | |||||
| Poor | Fair | Good | V Good | n/a | |
| History of presenting complaint | |||||
| Past ophthalmic history | |||||
| Family history | |||||
| Past medical history/general health | |||||
| Systems enquiry | |||||
| Drug history and allergies | |||||
| Social history | |||||
| Other relevant enquiries pertinent to case | |||||
| Assessment of mental state | |||||
| Awareness | |||||
| V good trainees are attentive the patient’s anxiety and main concerns. They are sensitive to the social impact of the patient’s problems. They adapt the interview appropriately as determined by the patient’s age, mental state and any communication problems such as poor hearing or language barriers.
Poor trainees disregard the patient’s main concerns or anxieties and any impact their problem may have on their social circumstances. They are insensitive to the potential barriers to good communication raised by extremes of age, mental state, hearing impairment or language. | |||||
| Poor | Fair | Good | V Good | n/a | |
| Sensitive and responsive to patient anxieties and concerns | |||||
| Aware of the social impact of problems for patient | |||||
| Interview sensitive and responsive to age of patient, mental state and any communication problems | |||||
| Management of interview | |||||
| V good trainees are skilled in questioning with an appropriate mixture of open and closed questions. They clarify what they have understood and check this with the patient by appropriate summaries. They use the time efficiently and guide the patient with sensitivity. They explain terms appropriately and finish the interview effectively, making future plans clear.
Poor trainees ask closed questions which do not encourage the patient to tell her/his story. They do not clarify points or attempt to summarise. They waste time through repetition or inappropriate questioning. They do not guide the patient appropriately. Information if provided at all unclear or too technical. They do not make it clear when the interview has come to an end or what the next step is. | |||||
| Poor | Fair | Good | V Good | n/a | |
| Mode of enquiry: appropriate use of closed, open, directed and probing questions. Clarification and summarising. | |||||
| Appropriate control and direction | |||||
| Efficient use of time | |||||
| Delivery of information | |||||
| Termination of interview | |||||
| Overall performance in this assessment | Poor | Fair | Good | V Good |
Summative Outcome (Delete as appropriate if tool used for summative assessments) Pass/Fail
Pass/Fail = Meets expectation /Does not meet expectation for stage of training
(Note: "Pass" requires an overall assessment grade of "Good" and NO individual "Poor" grades
Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.
|
|
|
|
| |
Signature of assessor: Signature of trainee:
Clinical Rating Scale CRS2 (Outcome CA2: ASSESS Vision)
COECSA Workplace Based Assessments
Clinical Rating Scale CRS2 (Outcome CA2: Assess Vision)
All trainees must be able to assess visual acuity for near and distance using an appropriate method and interpret the results. They must be aware of and be able to interpret and apply newer methods of assessing visual acuity when they are introduced into clinical practice. They must be able to test colour vision using an appropriate method and interpret the results. They should also know the principles of the assessment of contrast sensitivity. They must be able to assess vision in children and in adults who have language and other barriers to communication. They must be able to assess vision in circumstances outside the OPD environment.
Trainee’s Name Date (dd/mm/yyyy)
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 Other (specify)
Assessor's name Type of assessment: Formative Summative
Assessor's status Consultant Senior Trainee Other (Specify)
Brief description of case
Please grade the following areas using the scale below (use tick or cross)
| Attitude and manner | |||||
| V good trainees introduce themselves and establish the name of the patient and any other attendant (e.g. spouse, parent, carer). Their demeanour throughout shows that they are attentive to the patient by gestures, words of encouragement and appropriate eye contact. They explain the purpose of the test and how it will be carried out.
Poor trainees neither introduce themselves nor identify the patient. They hurry the patient and ignore what the patient is saying. They do not explain the test in an appropriate manner. | |||||
| Poor | Fair | Good | V Good | n/a | |
| Introduction and explanation of test | |||||
| Rapport with patient, empathy and sensitivity to age and context | |||||
| Respect for patient | |||||
| Visual acuity Method*: Snellen/LogMar/Sheridan-Gardner/other, specify
(* Please circle method as appropriate or specify “other”…………………………………………….) | |||||
| Very good trainees occlude each eye in turn to perform the test. They use an appropriate form of visual acuity assessment determined by the patient’s age and level of understanding. They can compare results from different tests. They use appropriate refractive correction and instruct the patient on the best use of a pinhole. They record the visual acuity correctly.
Poor trainees do not occlude appropriately. They do not use an appropriate test method. They do not understand the equivalence of results from different tests. They do not use an appropriate method of correcting refractive error. The visual acuity is recorded inaccurately or incorrectly. | |||||
| Poor | Fair | Good | V Good | n/a | |
| Appropriate occlusion | |||||
| Technique of assessment appropriate for age and context | |||||
| Appropriate use of refractive correction | |||||
| Appropriate use of pinhole | |||||
| Accurate recording of distance acuity | |||||
| Accurate recording of near acuity | |||||
COECSA Workplace Based Assessments
Clinical Rating Scale CRS2 (Outcome CA2: Assess Vision)
All trainees must be able to assess visual acuity for near and distance using an appropriate method and interpret the results. They must be aware of and be able to interpret and apply newer methods of assessing visual acuity when they are introduced into clinical practice. They must be able to test colour vision using an appropriate method and interpret the results. They should also know the principles of the assessment of contrast sensitivity. They must be able to assess vision in children and in adults who have language and other barriers to communication. They must be able to assess vision in circumstances outside the OPD environment.
| Colour vision (Method: Ishihara/other pseudoisochromatic/other) | |||||
| V good trainees occlude each eye in turn to perform the test. They use an appropriate form of colour vision assessment determined by the patient’s age and level of understanding. They can compare results from different tests. They record the results of the colour vision test correctly and know how to interpret them.
Poor trainees do not occlude appropriately. They do not choose an appropriate test method. They do not understand the equivalence of results from different tests. The colour vision is recorded inaccurately or incorrectly. They do not understand the implications of the result. | |||||
| Poor | Fair | Good | V Good | n/a | |
| Appropriate occlusion | |||||
| Technique of assessment appropriate for age and context | |||||
| Appropriate use of colour vision test | |||||
| Accurate recording of colour vision | |||||
| Overall performance in this assessment | Poor | Fair | Good | V Good |
Summative Outcome (Delete as appropriate if tool used for summative assessments) Pass/Fail
(Note: "Pass" requires an overall assessment grade of "Good" and NO individual "Poor" grades.)
Please use the boxes below/overleaf for free-text comments and recommendations for further training.
|
|
|
| Agreed action:
| |
Signature of assessor: Signature of trainee: