Difference between revisions of "COECSA RESIDENCY CURRICULUM"

From College of Ophthalmology of Eastern Central and Southern Africa
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 499: Line 499:
  
 
The table below summarizes the competences for the learning outcomes in their respective domains.<blockquote>'''PLEASE NOTE''' that in the various domains there are some crosscutting learning outcomes, hence the need to pay attention to the related learning outcomes while addressing a particular learning outcome.  </blockquote>
 
The table below summarizes the competences for the learning outcomes in their respective domains.<blockquote>'''PLEASE NOTE''' that in the various domains there are some crosscutting learning outcomes, hence the need to pay attention to the related learning outcomes while addressing a particular learning outcome.  </blockquote>
 +
 +
== '''ASSESSMENTS''' ==
 +
 +
==== '''''Assessments Overview''''' ====
 +
''Broadly speaking'' the learning outcomes for each domain of clinical practice are assessed as follows:
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|
 +
|Domain of  Practice
 +
|Assessment
 +
|-
 +
|'''BCS'''
 +
|Basic and  clinical sciences
 +
|Part 1  COECSA, Part 2 COECSA exams
 +
|-
 +
|'''CA'''
 +
|Clinical  assessment
 +
|WpBA*rating  scales, Part 2 COECSA exams
 +
|-
 +
|'''PI'''
 +
|Patient investigation
 +
|WpBA*rating  scales, Part 2 COECSA exams
 +
|-
 +
|'''PM'''
 +
|Patient  management
 +
|WpBA*rating  scales ,Part 2 COECSA exams
 +
|-
 +
|'''PS'''
 +
|Practical  skills
 +
|WpBA*rating  scales ,Part 2 COECSA exams
 +
|-
 +
|'''SS'''
 +
|Surgical  skills
 +
|WpBA*rating  scales, Part 2 COECSA exams
 +
|-
 +
|'''CEH'''
 +
|Community eye  health
 +
|WpBA*rating  scales ,Part 2 COECSA exams
 +
|-
 +
|'''Com'''
 +
|Communication
 +
|WpBA*rating  scales ,Part 2 COECSA exams
 +
|-
 +
|'''BP'''
 +
|Best  practice
 +
|WpBA*rating  scales
 +
|-
 +
|'''ML'''
 +
|Management  and leadership
 +
|WpBA*rating  scales
 +
|}
 +
 +
==== '''''EXAMINATIONS''''' ====
 +
 +
'''A.     Summative assessment in Ophthalmology residency'''
 +
 +
To qualify as an ophthalmologist under COECSA, a candidate must pass:
 +
 +
* ¨  Basic sciences exam ( Part1)
 +
* ¨  Refraction and Optics (intermediate)
 +
* ¨  Ophthalmic medicine and Ophthalmic surgery exam( Part 2)
 +
* ¨  Clinical final exam
 +
* ¨  (Dissertation/Publication)
 +
 +
 +
'''B.      Exams: Part 1 (Visual/Basic Sciences & Refraction and Optics)'''
 +
 +
* ¨  COECSA Part 1: ideally done during the first year of training. In the interim period, COECSA has opted to use ICO part one for convenience. The standards of ICO exams are universally accepted and a good number of residents are already sitting it in the region.
 +
* ¨  ICO Part 1 will be adopted as COECSA part 1 till April 2021.
 +
* ¨  The University MMed part 1 will be accepted as equivalent till end of 2019
 +
* ¨  In 2020, COECSA senate shall assess the value of ICO exams for COECSA, and decide whether to continue or set own?
 +
* ¨   From March 2022, COECSA will have its own part 1 exam if a decision to go that route is taken.
 +
* ¨  Further, COECSA Optics and refraction exam will also be the ICO exam from April 2019 until April 2022.
 +
* ¨   COECSA will have its own exam intermediate exam (Optics) from March 2023
 +
* ¨  MMed Optics and Refraction (if any), will be accepted as equivalent till End of December 2020
 +
 +
 +
'''C.       Exams: Part 2 (Opth medicine and surgery)'''
 +
 +
* ¨  COECSA Ophthalmic Medicine and surgery part 2 exam will be the ICO exam from April 2021 till March 2024.
 +
* ¨  MMed part 2 exam will be accepted as equivalent till end of 2021.
 +
* ¨  From April 2025, COECSA will have its own part 2 exam subject to College Senate decision
 +
 +
 +
'''D.      Clinical Final Exam'''
 +
 +
* ¨  The current COECSA Fellowship Exam will remain as the final exit Clinical Exam
 +
 +
==== '''''Target Year of Achievement (TYA)''''' ====
 +
'''These are summarized as follows:'''
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|'''TYA'''
 +
|'''Explanation'''
 +
|'''Example'''
 +
|-
 +
|Year 1
 +
|This LO must normally be achieved '''during  the first year''' of training and by the '''end of year 1 at the  latest'''.
 +
|CA1 (Clinical  history)
 +
|-
 +
|Year 2
 +
|This LO must normally be achieved '''during  the first or second year''' of training and by the '''end of year  2 at the latest'''. Failure to achieve a significant number of these LO  before the end of year 2 without mitigating circumstances may lead to a  trainee being removed from the training programme.
 +
|BCS (Basic &  Clinical Sciences)
 +
|-
 +
|Year 3
 +
|This LO must normally be achieved '''during  the first three years''' of training and by the '''end of year 3  at the latest'''. Failure to achieve a significant number of these LO before  year 3 may require year 3 to be repeated.
 +
|SS4 (Cataract)
 +
 +
PS1 (Refraction)
 +
|-
 +
|Year 1,2,3/4 annual review
 +
|This LO must be achieved before the end of  year 2 '''and''' will be assessed annually thereafter.
 +
|BP10-30
 +
 +
COM1-14
 +
|-
 +
|Year 3/4
 +
|This LO must be achieved in order to complete  the core curriculum. It is unlikely to be achieved in the first two years of  training but may be achieved anytime during years 3/4
 +
|SS5 (surgery to lower  IOP)
 +
|} 
 +
 +
==== '''''WorkPLACE BaseD Assessments''''' ====
 +
'''The following WpBA assessment tools are available for Training:'''
 +
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|'''Tool'''
 +
|'''Code'''
 +
|'''Number of tools'''
 +
|'''Main Learning Outcome Domains Assessed'''
 +
|-
 +
|Clinical Rating Scale (modified CEX)
 +
|CRS
 +
|8
 +
|Clinical Assessment; Practical Refraction
 +
|-
 +
|Case based Discussion
 +
|CbD
 +
|1
 +
|Patient Investigation; Communication; Patient Management; Best  Practice; Community Eye Health; Management and Leadership; Basic and Clinical  Sciences
 +
|-
 +
|Direct Observation of Procedural Skills
 +
|DOPS
 +
|1
 +
|Practical Skills; Communication; Patient Investigation
 +
|-
 +
|Objective Assessment of Surgical and Technical Skills
 +
 +
 +
Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubric
 +
|OSATS
 +
 +
 +
 +
OSCAR
 +
|4
 +
|Surgical Skills; Communication
 +
|-
 +
|Multi-source feedback (modified PAT)
 +
|MSF
 +
|1
 +
|Communication; Best Practice
 +
|}
 +
The WpBA tools are available through the website to download for completion, validation by the trainer and can be stored in a paper-based portfolio/e-portfolio (when available). Guidance is available at your institution about who should be the assessor as not all assessments need to be performed by a consultant ophthalmologist. The target year of achievement (TYA) guidance indicates when each WpBA should be achieved.
 +
 +
If a trainee does not complete an assessment successfully, the assessment tool will act as a useful source of feedback and allow preparation for a subsequent assessment. It therefore allows for both formative (developmental) and summative (competence) assessment. Trainees should be encouraged to undergo formative assessment regularly as part of their training and not see 'failure' at an assessment as a problem. Trainees should keep all assessment forms in their portfolio to show that they are obtaining appropriate feedback and making progress. A portfolio that only contains 'passed' assessments should be discouraged - there should be a "culture of deferred success". A variety of assessors should be used, and especially where two satisfactory assessments are required in any year these should be completed by different assessors where possible.
 +
 +
 +
'''''MILESTONES'''''
 +
 +
Milestones are knowledge, skills, attitudes, and other attributes organized in a developmental framework from less to more advanced.  They are descriptors and targets for resident performance as the resident moves from entry into residency through graduation.  These milestones were adapted from the ACGME Milestones used for residency training in the USA facilitated by the International Council of Ophthalmology and Orbis International. Each of the COECSA sub-domains of performance have been mapped to the milestones. The original ACGME milestone language has been modified when necessary to reflect practice in the COECSA region and correspond to the COECSA Curriculum. 
 +
 +
Every six months, the level of milestones that best describes each resident’s current performance level should be selected based on appropriate assessment methods. The suggested methods are listed after each milestone.  Thus, a variety of assessment tools must be completed every 6 months. These include oral and/or written tests, multisource feedback (360 degree assessment), observed clinical evaluations (CRS, OCEX) and assessments of procedural and surgical skill (DOPS, OSATS, OSCAR). This reporting form should be reviewed with each resident individually to give feedback regarding their progress. Completion of the milestone document will show if there are specific weaknesses in individual residents and allow early detection and hopefully successful remediation.
 +
 +
Milestones are arranged into expectations based on progression through training and not necessary according to the year of residency.  Level 3 corresponds to the halfway point of training which will depend on the number of years of training the program has. Selection of a level implies that the resident substantially demonstrates the milestones in that level as well as those in earlier level.  (See Reporting Form diagram below.)   
 +
 +
'''Level 1:''' The resident demonstrates milestones expected of someone at the beginning ophthalmology residency.  
 +
 +
'''Level 2:''' The resident is advancing and demonstrating year 1 milestones.  
 +
 +
'''Level 3:''' The resident continues to advance and is demonstrating additional milestones; the resident consistently demonstrates the majority of milestones targeted for mid residency. 
 +
 +
'''Level 4:''' The resident has advanced so that he or she now substantially demonstrates the milestones targeted for residency.  This level is designed as the graduation target. Successfully graduating residents should be achieving this level in all areas.
 +
 +
'''Level 5:''' The resident has advanced beyond performance targets set for residency and is demonstrating “aspirational” goals which might describe the performance of someone who has been in practice for several years.  It is expected that only a few exceptional residents will reach this level.  
 +
 +
==== '''''PORTFOLIO''''' ====
 +
The trainee's portfolio serves 2 important purposes for WBA:
 +
 +
* It contains all of the documents produced    through the WBA tools described above
 +
* It contains evidence that the trainee    collects to show that they have met the remaining LO in the curriculum
 +
 +
The trainee should regularly maintain the portfolio and use it for the following:
 +
 +
* To store and organize WBA documents    as they occur
 +
* To record clinical experience (log book)
 +
* To reflect upon clinical experience and plan    learning (reflective diary)
 +
* To record meetings with educational    supervisor (appraisal documents)
 +
* To prepare for the annual assessment    (revalidation)
 +
* To record formal and informal learning    episodes (CPD document)
 +
* To store audit/research/teaching activities
 +
* To record any critical incidents,    complaints, guidelines (clinical governance)
 +
* Any other information that supports the    trainee's ''Good Medical Practice'' e.g. letters from    patients, feedback
 +
 +
Specific Learning Outcomes that are assessed at the annual assessment by reviewing the portfolio are:
 +
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
| colspan="2" |'''Learning Outcome (LO)'''
 +
|'''Target Year (TYA)*'''
 +
|'''Example of possible evidence'''
 +
|-
 +
|  PS1
 +
|Refraction
 +
|2
 +
|DOPS
 +
|-
 +
|PS13
 +
|Biometry
 +
|2
 +
|DOPS
 +
|-
 +
|PS14
 +
|Hand Hygiene
 +
|1
 +
|MSF
 +
|-
 +
|BP17
 +
|Appraisal and 360 degree feedback
 +
|2
 +
|Record of discussion, MSF,
 +
|-
 +
|BP19
 +
|Probity
 +
|1
 +
|Statement
 +
|-
 +
|BP20
 +
|Practice according to National Legal  requirements
 +
|2
 +
|Record of discussion,  MSF
 +
|-
 +
|BP21
 +
|Data Protection
 +
|1
 +
|Record of discussion
 +
|-
 +
|BP22
 +
|Human Tissue
 +
|2
 +
|Record of discussion
 +
|-
 +
|BP23
 +
|Child Protection and safeguarding
 +
|2
 +
|Record of discussion
 +
|-
 +
|BP30
 +
|Personal Health
 +
|1
 +
|Statement
 +
|-
 +
|  PS8
 +
|Ocular surface foreign body
 +
|1
 +
|DOPS forms
 +
|-
 +
|  PS7
 +
|corneal  scrape
 +
|1
 +
|DOPS forms
 +
|-
 +
|  SS2
 +
|Operating Microscope
 +
|1
 +
|OSATS forms
 +
|}
 +
 +
==== '''''QUALITY ASSURANCE''''' ====
 +
In order to ensure that trainees have undergone the same training, quality assurance (QA) tools will be demanded at the end of the training programme as part of the assessment.
 +
 +
 +
== '''APPENDIX''' ==
 +
 +
==== '''''ThE COECSA MILESTONES''''' ====
 +
 +
'''Milestone Reporting'''
 +
 +
This section presents milestones designed for programs to use in semi-annual review of resident performance. Milestones are knowledge, skills, attitudes, and other attributes organized in a developmental framework from less to more advanced.  They are descriptors and targets for resident performance as the resident moves from entry into residency through graduation.  These milestones were adapted from the ACGME Milestones used for residency training in the USA facilitated by the International Council of Ophthalmology and Orbis International. Each of the COECSA sub-domains of performance have been mapped to the milestones. The original ACGME milestone language has been modified when necessary to reflect practice in the COECSA region and correspond to the COECSA Curriculum.  
 +
 +
 +
Every six months, the level of milestones that best describes each resident’s current performance level should be selected based on appropriate assessment methods. The suggested methods are listed after each milestone.  Thus, a variety of assessment tools must be completed every 6 months. These include oral and/or written tests, multisource feedback (360 degree assessment), observed clinical evaluations (CRS, OCEX) and assessments of procedural and surgical skill (DOPS, OSATS, OSCAR). This reporting form should be reviewed with each resident individually to give feedback regarding their progress. Completion of the milestone document will show if there are specific weaknesses in individual residents and allow early detection and hopefully successful remediation.
 +
 +
 +
Milestones are arranged into expectations based on progression through training and not necessary according to the year of residency.  Level 3 corresponds to the halfway point of training which will depend on the number of years of training the program has. Selection of a level implies that the resident substantially demonstrates the milestones in that level as well as those in earlier level.  (See Reporting Form diagram below.)
 +
 +
   
 +
 +
'''Level 1:''' The resident demonstrates milestones expected of someone at the beginning ophthalmology residency.  
 +
 +
'''Level 2:''' The resident is advancing and demonstrating year 1 milestones.  
 +
 +
'''Level 3:''' The resident continues to advance and is demonstrating additional milestones; the resident consistently demonstrates the majority of milestones targeted for mid residency. 
 +
 +
'''Level 4:''' The resident has advanced so that he or she now substantially demonstrates the milestones targeted for residency.  This level is designed as the graduation target. Successfully graduating residents should be achieving this level in all areas.
 +
 +
'''Level 5:''' The resident has advanced beyond performance targets set for residency and is demonstrating “aspirational” goals which might describe the performance of someone who has been in practice for several years.  It is expected that only a few exceptional residents will reach this level.  

Revision as of 15:09, 8 December 2020

PREAMBLE

INTRODUCTION

The College of Ophthalmology of Eastern, Central and Southern Africa (COECSA) is a specialized virtual college. The college was registered in 2012 after a successful merger between the Eastern Africa College of Ophthalmologists (EACO) and the Ophthalmological Society of Eastern Africa (OSEA). The aim of this college is to address the chronic shortage of ophthalmologists in Eastern, Central and Southern Africa (ECSA) as well as improve the quality of eye care services in the region. The institution is anchored within the Vision 2020 framework developed under the aegis of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Agency for Prevention of Blindness (IAPB). Its establishment was informed by similar initiatives including the Medical Colleges in South Africa and the United Kingdom. However, COECSA aims to address the unique needs ECSA region based on evidence and priorities identified in the region. COECSA’s geographic focus is the ECSA region comprising Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Rwanda, Burundi, Malawi, Ethiopia, Zambia, South Sudan, Zimbabwe, Somalia and Mozambique. COECSA works closely with other players in  eye health and allied sectors in making interventions in the region.

Vision

Eye health for all in Eastern, Central and Southern Africa.

Mission

To improve the quality of eye care through training, research and advocacy; provide leadership in eye care; and create a forum for exchange of ophthalmic skills, knowledge and resources in Eastern, Central and Southern Africa.

Scope of COECSA’s work

COECSA’s work is derived from its mission. The College acts as the voice of the profession in the region, tasked to set the curriculum and examinations for trainee ophthalmologists, provide training in ophthalmology, set and maintain standards in the practice of ophthalmology and promote research and advance science in the specialty. COECSA is not a regulatory body and does not have a role in disciplinary actions relating to ophthalmologists. COECSA does not offer advice to patients on their individual condition or treatment options.

COECSA’s Mandate

COECSA operates within the wider environment of health in the region. However, eye health remains an obscure footnote in the health agenda. More often than not, focus on eye health is not given sufficient attention and support. COECSA and its partners wish to make better known the issues of eye health in the region. The mandate of COECSA is to:

  • Contribute to the  human resources  for  health through  quality  training in ophthalmology
  • Set standards for  professional  ophthalmic  practice
  • Facilitate continuing professional development
  • Contribute to health policy development 
  • Promote research which advances ophthalmology in the region
  • Create a forum for exchange of skills and knowledge
COECSA CURRICULUM

The COECSA curriculum offers regional consensus on what competences are required and what should be taught to residents. This curriculum is meant to be a guide for ophthalmology departments in designing training programs in their respective institutions. The curriculum will also act as a guide to trainees by providing a reference against which they can assess their progress. All institutions accredited to offer residency training programs shall be required to comply fully with the provisions of the College Council accreditation norms and standards.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The COECSA Residency Curriculum – 2020 Version has been developed following a review of the 2017 version of the curriculum based on recommendations from an independent consultancy which was commissioned by the College. The consultancy was a review of curriculum documents, an assessment on how they can be utilised and development of additional resources that will enhance and be supplementary to the existing curriculum. The curriculum review will now be conducted every after 5 years.

The key highlights of the 2020 Version aside from the general correction of formatting errors include:

  • A break of the different learning domains into detailed sub domains/competences
  • Defined learning milestones for each of the sub-domain
  • Assessment forms for each competence
  • Description of the Exams to be administered under the curriculum and an additional learning outcome on Gonioscopy


COECSA leadership wishes to acknowledge the immediate past President Dr. Ibrahim Matende under whose leadership the COECSA curriculum work was initiated. We further acknowledge the Education and Accreditation Committee for providing leadership in the development and review of the residency curriculum.  The College acknowledges in particular the able leadership of Dr. Anna Sanyiwa (Muhimbili University of Health &Allied Sciences), Chair of the Curriculum Subcommittee (2016-2019) under which this work was made a success.

We further acknowledge the following for the immense contributions towards development of the first version of this curricula.

  • Dr. Anne Ampaire Musika (from Makerere University, Uganda)
  • Dr. Seneadza Asiwome
  • Dr. Millicent Kariuki, Prof. Dunera Ilako and Dr. Kahaki Kimani (all of University of Nairobi, Kenya)
  • Dr. John Nkurikiye and Prof. Wanjiku Mathenge (both of Rwanda International Institute of Ophthalmology)
  • Dr. Levi Kandeke (Burundi)
  • Dr. Gerald Msukwa and Dr. Petros Kayange (University of Malawi),
  • Dr. Yeshigeta Gelaw (Jimma University, Ethiopia),
  • Dr. Grace Chipalo - Mutati (University Teaching Hospital, Zambia),
  • Dr. Geoffrey Wabulembo and Dr. Grace Ssali (Makerere University, Uganda),
  • Dr. William Makupa (Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre),  
  • Prof. Amos Twinamasiko and Dr John Onyango (both of Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Uganda)
  • Dr.  Elias Hailu (Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia)

We also extend our gratitude to the team that reviewed and compiled the 2020 Version of the curriculum, for their commitment and hard work. These are:

1.      Prof. Ciku Mathenge, (Rwanda International Institute of Ophthalmology, Rwanda)

2.      Dr. John Cropsey (Kibuye Hope Hospital, Burundi)

3.      Mr. Robert Ntitima (COECSA – Education and Training)

4.      Dr. Zipporah Phiri (University Teaching Hospital, Zambia)


Special thanks also go to the Royal College of Ophthalmologists (RCOphth, UK) curriculum team comprising Dr. David Cottrell, Dr. Mike Nelson, Dr. Fiona Spencer, Prof. Carrie MacEwen, Ms. Kathy Evans, Mrs. Emily Beet, Ms. Beth Barnes, Ms. Denise Mabey and Ms. Susannah Grant for the technical input and support throughout the development process.

We further appreciate Softcall Communications for developing the online curriculum management system and for offering technical and training support.


The College extends special gratitude to Tropical Health Education Trust (THET) for providing funding through the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) and the International Centre for Eye Health (ICEH) that made this process possible. We are particularly grateful to Mr. Nick Astbury and Ms. Marcia Zondervan of the LSHTM for their unrelenting support.


Last but not least, we would like to acknowledge the secretarial and logistical support of the COECSA Secretariat throughout this process.


Dr. John Nkurikiye

COECSA President

THE CURRICULUM AT A GLANCE

Rationale

As a virtual college, COECSA works closely with accredited residency training institutions in the region to deliver ophthalmology training. This curriculum is meant to be a guide for ophthalmology departments in designing training programs in their respective institutions. Departments will be expected to structure their programs according to the system in their universities.  At present, some universities still operate on term system while others have adapted the semester system.  Also program duration varies from one institution to the other. In most residency training institutions in the region, the ophthalmology residency program (Master of Medicine in Ophthalmology) runs for three years, while in some institutions it runs for four years.  Departments will therefore be required to organize the recommended content to fit within their own time structure. The curriculum will also act as a guide to trainees by providing a reference against which they can assess their progress.

All institutions accredited to offer residency training programs shall be required to comply fully with the provisions of the College accreditation norms and standards.

PROGRAM DELIVERY

Recommended length of COECSA Residency Program

To deliver all the learning outcomes in the COECSA curriculum, it is recommended that a residency training program should be structured to be completed in a minimum period of 4 years.

ASSESSMENT TOOLS

The resident will be assessed using the assessment and feedback tools recommended in the curriculum and by the COECSA examination. The assessment and feedback tools allow each workplace based assessment to be recorded and the minimum recommended numbers are included for the relevant learning outcomes.

COECSA residency curriculum adoption by existing training programs

The institutions that are just about to commence training are recommended to use the COECSA Competency Based Curriculum as the foundation of their training course. It is suggested that:

  • A presentation be made to have the COECSA Competency Based Curriculum accepted at the National Accrediting Authorities.
  • Existing institutions integrate the curriculum at the earliest opportunity during the curriculum review process.
  • A staff meeting / workshop be conducted to introduce the COECSA Competency Based Curriculum.
  • An introductory lecture at ophthalmology meetings locally or nationally could be used to introduce the COECSA Competency Based Curriculum to a wider audience.
  • All the parties involved should be encouraged to familiarize themselves with the learning outcomes and assessment / feedback tools. A workshop for making the assessment and feedback tools effective is important (see Training the Trainers).
  • Issuance of a Digital Version of the COECSA Competency Based Curriculum be made to each resident so they have access to it where web access is limited.
Achievement of learning outcomes

This curriculum has 139 learning outcomes (see 2.0: learning outcomes summary table). For the different learning outcomes to be achieved, reference should be made to the 10 domains of the COECSA curriculum to establish the specified target years of achievement.

The domains describe the outcomes which the ophthalmology trainee should strive to achieve and ophthalmologists should refer to these domains throughout the process of maintaining competence. The 10 domains include Basic & Clinical Sciences, Clinical Assessment, Patient Investigation, Patient Management and Practical Skills. Others are Surgical Skills, Community Eye Health, Communication, Best Practice and Management and Leadership.

It should be noted that the various domains have some crosscutting learning outcomes; thus, there is need to pay attention to the related learning outcomes while addressing a particular learning outcome.

Learning Methods/Delivery

A combination of several methods of delivery will be used to achieve face to face apprenticeship. The methods include Lectures, Clinical Work, Clinical Teachings, Tutorials, Seminars, Conferences and Demonstrations.

It will further be implemented through teaching in Surgical Skills Laboratory and Wet Lab, Log Books, Dissertations, Self-Directed Learning, Clinical Clerkship including normal working hours and calls as well as conducting Ward Rounds. Other methods include Supervising and Teaching the Junior Medical Staff who include undergraduate Medical Students and Paramedical Trainees, carrying out Call Duties as per the Hospital Schedule as well as external Clinical Rotations with the goal to have 2 external Clinical Rotations of 8 weeks each during the 2nd and 3rd Year of the Course.

THE SUMMARY TABLE

DOMAINS 1) Basic & Clinical Sciences 2) Clinical Assessment 3) Patient Investigation 4) Patient Management 5) Practical Skills 6) Surgical   Skills 7) Community Eye Health 8) Communication 9) Best Practice 10) Management and Leadership
                               LEARNING  OUTCOMES Anatomy And Embryology Clinical History Orthoptic Assessment Management Plan Refraction Simulation And Wet Lab Screening Establishing Rapport Learning Health Service Organization
Physiology Assess Vision Corneal Assessment Triage/Prioritization Periocular And Intraocular Drug Administration Operating Microscope Injury Prevention Active Listening Records Clinical Governance
Biochemistry & Cell Biology External Eye Examination Ultrasonography Therapeutics/Local And Systemic Therapies Diathermy/Cautery Aseptic Technique Disease Risk Reduction Delivering Information Guidelines Cooperation With Other Services
Pathology Pupil Examination Angiography Patient Selection For Surgery Cryotherapy Cataract Surgery Immunization And Supplementation Directing Patients To Information Portfolio Role As A Leader
Optics Ocular Motility Retinal And Optic Nerve Imaging Recognize And Manage Complications Assess Tear Film Surgery For Raised IOP Determining the magnitude and burden of blindness Obtaining Consent IT Role As A Community/Clinical Researcher
Clinical Ophthalmology IOP Measurement Radiology/ Other Imaging Emergencies/ First Aid/Resuscitation Assess Lacrimal Drainage Repair Trauma Develop Health Promotion Action Plan Breaking Bad News Manage Referrals Role As A Teacher
Clinical Pharmacology Slit Lamp Electrophysiology Rehabilitation And Low Vision Corneal Scrape Common Lid Surgery Barriers To Communication Waiting List Management Role As A Manager
General Medicine For Ophthalmology Fundus Examination Laboratory Investigations Refer Appropriately Ocular Surface Foreign Body Surgery For Surface Protection Body Language Use Of Databases Apply Clinical Reasoning Using An Evidence Based Approach
1) Basic & Clinical Sciences 2) Clinical Assessment 3) Patient Investigation 4) Patient Management 5) Practical Skills 6) Surgical   Skills 7) Community Eye Health 8) Communication 9) Best Practice 10) Management and Leadership
Research Methodology, Epidemiology And Evidence Based Medicine General Medical Examination Biometry Systemic Implications Removal Of Sutures Lateral Canthotomy/Lysis Respond To Complaints Critical Incident Management Departmental Audit
Instruments Paediatric/ Developmental Examination Visual Fields Spectacle Lenses Bandage Contact Lens Biopsy Eyelid And Ocular Tissue Communicate With Other Professionals Compassionate Personal Audit
Statistics Neuro Examination Contact lens and diagnostic equipment care Contact Lenses Corneal Glue Strabismus Surgery Keeping Clinical Records Patient Autonomy Health Economics/Managing Resources
Clinical Genetics Differential Diagnosis Forced Duction Test Removal Of Eye Write And Dictate Clearly Consideration Prepare Monitoring And Evaluation Tools Of Projects
Gonioscopy
Biometry Laser - Lens Capsule Preparing An Operating List Patient Empathy
Hand Hygiene Laser - Raised IOP Organizing Leave Patient Confidentiality
Laser - Retina Insight Into Limitations
AC/Vitreous Tap Seeking Help
Anterior Vitrectomy Appraisal And 360 Degree Feedback
Equality And Ethics
Probity
Practice According To National Legal Requirements
Data Protection
Human Tissue
Child Protection/ Safeguarding
Time Management
Reflective Practice
Self-Learning
Uncertainty
CPD
Career Development
Personal Health

COECSA DOMAINS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE SUMMARY

COECSA has defined 10 domains for clinical ophthalmology practice. These domains describe a framework of competencies applicable to all ophthalmologists across the continuum of professional development from formal medical education and training through to maintenance of professional competence. They describe the outcomes which the ophthalmology trainee should strive to achieve and ophthalmologists should refer to these domains throughout the process of maintaining competence.

The 10 domains include:

  1. Basic & Clinical Sciences          
  2. Clinical Assessment    
  3. Patient Investigation  
  4. Patient Management  
  5. Practical Skills              
  6. Surgical Skills
  7. Community Eye Health
  8. Communication            
  9. Best Practice
  10. Management and Leadership

The table below summarizes the competences for the learning outcomes in their respective domains.

PLEASE NOTE that in the various domains there are some crosscutting learning outcomes, hence the need to pay attention to the related learning outcomes while addressing a particular learning outcome.  

ASSESSMENTS

Assessments Overview

Broadly speaking the learning outcomes for each domain of clinical practice are assessed as follows:

Domain of Practice Assessment
BCS Basic and clinical sciences Part 1 COECSA, Part 2 COECSA exams
CA Clinical assessment WpBA*rating scales, Part 2 COECSA exams
PI Patient investigation WpBA*rating scales, Part 2 COECSA exams
PM Patient management WpBA*rating scales ,Part 2 COECSA exams
PS Practical skills WpBA*rating scales ,Part 2 COECSA exams
SS Surgical skills WpBA*rating scales, Part 2 COECSA exams
CEH Community eye health WpBA*rating scales ,Part 2 COECSA exams
Com Communication WpBA*rating scales ,Part 2 COECSA exams
BP Best practice WpBA*rating scales
ML Management and leadership WpBA*rating scales

EXAMINATIONS

A.     Summative assessment in Ophthalmology residency

To qualify as an ophthalmologist under COECSA, a candidate must pass:

  • ¨  Basic sciences exam ( Part1)
  • ¨  Refraction and Optics (intermediate)
  • ¨  Ophthalmic medicine and Ophthalmic surgery exam( Part 2)
  • ¨  Clinical final exam
  • ¨  (Dissertation/Publication)


B.      Exams: Part 1 (Visual/Basic Sciences & Refraction and Optics)

  • ¨  COECSA Part 1: ideally done during the first year of training. In the interim period, COECSA has opted to use ICO part one for convenience. The standards of ICO exams are universally accepted and a good number of residents are already sitting it in the region.
  • ¨  ICO Part 1 will be adopted as COECSA part 1 till April 2021.
  • ¨  The University MMed part 1 will be accepted as equivalent till end of 2019
  • ¨  In 2020, COECSA senate shall assess the value of ICO exams for COECSA, and decide whether to continue or set own?
  • ¨   From March 2022, COECSA will have its own part 1 exam if a decision to go that route is taken.
  • ¨  Further, COECSA Optics and refraction exam will also be the ICO exam from April 2019 until April 2022.
  • ¨   COECSA will have its own exam intermediate exam (Optics) from March 2023
  • ¨  MMed Optics and Refraction (if any), will be accepted as equivalent till End of December 2020


C.       Exams: Part 2 (Opth medicine and surgery)

  • ¨  COECSA Ophthalmic Medicine and surgery part 2 exam will be the ICO exam from April 2021 till March 2024.
  • ¨  MMed part 2 exam will be accepted as equivalent till end of 2021.
  • ¨  From April 2025, COECSA will have its own part 2 exam subject to College Senate decision


D.      Clinical Final Exam

  • ¨  The current COECSA Fellowship Exam will remain as the final exit Clinical Exam

Target Year of Achievement (TYA)

These are summarized as follows:

TYA Explanation Example
Year 1 This LO must normally be achieved during the first year of training and by the end of year 1 at the latest. CA1 (Clinical history)
Year 2 This LO must normally be achieved during the first or second year of training and by the end of year 2 at the latest. Failure to achieve a significant number of these LO before the end of year 2 without mitigating circumstances may lead to a trainee being removed from the training programme. BCS (Basic & Clinical Sciences)
Year 3 This LO must normally be achieved during the first three years of training and by the end of year 3 at the latest. Failure to achieve a significant number of these LO before year 3 may require year 3 to be repeated. SS4 (Cataract)

PS1 (Refraction)

Year 1,2,3/4 annual review This LO must be achieved before the end of year 2 and will be assessed annually thereafter. BP10-30

COM1-14

Year 3/4 This LO must be achieved in order to complete the core curriculum. It is unlikely to be achieved in the first two years of training but may be achieved anytime during years 3/4 SS5 (surgery to lower IOP)

WorkPLACE BaseD Assessments

The following WpBA assessment tools are available for Training:

Tool Code Number of tools Main Learning Outcome Domains Assessed
Clinical Rating Scale (modified CEX) CRS 8 Clinical Assessment; Practical Refraction
Case based Discussion CbD 1 Patient Investigation; Communication; Patient Management; Best Practice; Community Eye Health; Management and Leadership; Basic and Clinical Sciences
Direct Observation of Procedural Skills DOPS 1 Practical Skills; Communication; Patient Investigation
Objective Assessment of Surgical and Technical Skills


Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubric

OSATS


OSCAR

4 Surgical Skills; Communication
Multi-source feedback (modified PAT) MSF 1 Communication; Best Practice

The WpBA tools are available through the website to download for completion, validation by the trainer and can be stored in a paper-based portfolio/e-portfolio (when available). Guidance is available at your institution about who should be the assessor as not all assessments need to be performed by a consultant ophthalmologist. The target year of achievement (TYA) guidance indicates when each WpBA should be achieved.

If a trainee does not complete an assessment successfully, the assessment tool will act as a useful source of feedback and allow preparation for a subsequent assessment. It therefore allows for both formative (developmental) and summative (competence) assessment. Trainees should be encouraged to undergo formative assessment regularly as part of their training and not see 'failure' at an assessment as a problem. Trainees should keep all assessment forms in their portfolio to show that they are obtaining appropriate feedback and making progress. A portfolio that only contains 'passed' assessments should be discouraged - there should be a "culture of deferred success". A variety of assessors should be used, and especially where two satisfactory assessments are required in any year these should be completed by different assessors where possible.


MILESTONES

Milestones are knowledge, skills, attitudes, and other attributes organized in a developmental framework from less to more advanced.  They are descriptors and targets for resident performance as the resident moves from entry into residency through graduation.  These milestones were adapted from the ACGME Milestones used for residency training in the USA facilitated by the International Council of Ophthalmology and Orbis International. Each of the COECSA sub-domains of performance have been mapped to the milestones. The original ACGME milestone language has been modified when necessary to reflect practice in the COECSA region and correspond to the COECSA Curriculum. 

Every six months, the level of milestones that best describes each resident’s current performance level should be selected based on appropriate assessment methods. The suggested methods are listed after each milestone.  Thus, a variety of assessment tools must be completed every 6 months. These include oral and/or written tests, multisource feedback (360 degree assessment), observed clinical evaluations (CRS, OCEX) and assessments of procedural and surgical skill (DOPS, OSATS, OSCAR). This reporting form should be reviewed with each resident individually to give feedback regarding their progress. Completion of the milestone document will show if there are specific weaknesses in individual residents and allow early detection and hopefully successful remediation.

Milestones are arranged into expectations based on progression through training and not necessary according to the year of residency.  Level 3 corresponds to the halfway point of training which will depend on the number of years of training the program has. Selection of a level implies that the resident substantially demonstrates the milestones in that level as well as those in earlier level.  (See Reporting Form diagram below.)   

Level 1: The resident demonstrates milestones expected of someone at the beginning ophthalmology residency.  

Level 2: The resident is advancing and demonstrating year 1 milestones.  

Level 3: The resident continues to advance and is demonstrating additional milestones; the resident consistently demonstrates the majority of milestones targeted for mid residency. 

Level 4: The resident has advanced so that he or she now substantially demonstrates the milestones targeted for residency.  This level is designed as the graduation target. Successfully graduating residents should be achieving this level in all areas.

Level 5: The resident has advanced beyond performance targets set for residency and is demonstrating “aspirational” goals which might describe the performance of someone who has been in practice for several years.  It is expected that only a few exceptional residents will reach this level.  

PORTFOLIO

The trainee's portfolio serves 2 important purposes for WBA:

  • It contains all of the documents produced through the WBA tools described above
  • It contains evidence that the trainee collects to show that they have met the remaining LO in the curriculum

The trainee should regularly maintain the portfolio and use it for the following:

  • To store and organize WBA documents as they occur
  • To record clinical experience (log book)
  • To reflect upon clinical experience and plan learning (reflective diary)
  • To record meetings with educational supervisor (appraisal documents)
  • To prepare for the annual assessment (revalidation)
  • To record formal and informal learning episodes (CPD document)
  • To store audit/research/teaching activities
  • To record any critical incidents, complaints, guidelines (clinical governance)
  • Any other information that supports the trainee's Good Medical Practice e.g. letters from patients, feedback

Specific Learning Outcomes that are assessed at the annual assessment by reviewing the portfolio are:

Learning Outcome (LO) Target Year (TYA)* Example of possible evidence
  PS1 Refraction 2 DOPS
PS13 Biometry 2 DOPS
PS14 Hand Hygiene 1 MSF
BP17 Appraisal and 360 degree feedback 2 Record of discussion, MSF,
BP19 Probity 1 Statement
BP20 Practice according to National Legal requirements 2 Record of discussion,  MSF
BP21 Data Protection 1 Record of discussion
BP22 Human Tissue 2 Record of discussion
BP23 Child Protection and safeguarding 2 Record of discussion
BP30 Personal Health 1 Statement
  PS8 Ocular surface foreign body 1 DOPS forms
  PS7 corneal scrape 1 DOPS forms
  SS2 Operating Microscope 1 OSATS forms

QUALITY ASSURANCE

In order to ensure that trainees have undergone the same training, quality assurance (QA) tools will be demanded at the end of the training programme as part of the assessment.


APPENDIX

ThE COECSA MILESTONES

Milestone Reporting

This section presents milestones designed for programs to use in semi-annual review of resident performance. Milestones are knowledge, skills, attitudes, and other attributes organized in a developmental framework from less to more advanced.  They are descriptors and targets for resident performance as the resident moves from entry into residency through graduation.  These milestones were adapted from the ACGME Milestones used for residency training in the USA facilitated by the International Council of Ophthalmology and Orbis International. Each of the COECSA sub-domains of performance have been mapped to the milestones. The original ACGME milestone language has been modified when necessary to reflect practice in the COECSA region and correspond to the COECSA Curriculum.  


Every six months, the level of milestones that best describes each resident’s current performance level should be selected based on appropriate assessment methods. The suggested methods are listed after each milestone.  Thus, a variety of assessment tools must be completed every 6 months. These include oral and/or written tests, multisource feedback (360 degree assessment), observed clinical evaluations (CRS, OCEX) and assessments of procedural and surgical skill (DOPS, OSATS, OSCAR). This reporting form should be reviewed with each resident individually to give feedback regarding their progress. Completion of the milestone document will show if there are specific weaknesses in individual residents and allow early detection and hopefully successful remediation.


Milestones are arranged into expectations based on progression through training and not necessary according to the year of residency.  Level 3 corresponds to the halfway point of training which will depend on the number of years of training the program has. Selection of a level implies that the resident substantially demonstrates the milestones in that level as well as those in earlier level.  (See Reporting Form diagram below.)

   

Level 1: The resident demonstrates milestones expected of someone at the beginning ophthalmology residency.  

Level 2: The resident is advancing and demonstrating year 1 milestones.  

Level 3: The resident continues to advance and is demonstrating additional milestones; the resident consistently demonstrates the majority of milestones targeted for mid residency. 

Level 4: The resident has advanced so that he or she now substantially demonstrates the milestones targeted for residency.  This level is designed as the graduation target. Successfully graduating residents should be achieving this level in all areas.

Level 5: The resident has advanced beyond performance targets set for residency and is demonstrating “aspirational” goals which might describe the performance of someone who has been in practice for several years.  It is expected that only a few exceptional residents will reach this level.